Tuesday, February 22, 2022

Digest for comp.programming.threads@googlegroups.com - 8 updates in 8 topics

Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 21 03:15PM -0800

Hello,
 
 
More of my philosophy about fibers and about Apples and more..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
 
11 of 163 g apples cost around 6 canadian dollars.
 
A 163 g apple contains around 4.4 g of fiber, so if you take
4 of them per day it will give 17.6 g of fiber, so that's good.
 
And nutrition specialists recommend consuming 25 to 30 g of fiber per day.
 
And to know more about apples, read the following:
 
What to know about apples
 
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/267290
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 21 03:04PM -0800

Hello,
 
 
More of my philosophy about will we produce enough food for the world population and more..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
 
And read my following interesting writing since it is proving that we will produce enough food for the world population that could peak at nearly 11 billion around 2100:
 
AI, robots and "vertical farms" integrate agriculture to produce 400
times more yield, using 95% less water and 99% less space
 
Read more here:
 
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fintelligence-artificielle.developpez.com%2Factu%2F311485%2FL-IA-les-robots-et-les-fermes-verticales-integrent-l-agriculture-pour-produire-400-fois-plus-de-rendement-en-utilisant-95-pourcent-moins-d-eau-et-99-pourcent-moins-d-espace%2F
 
2-Acre Vertical Farm Run By AI And Robots Out-Produces 720-Acre Flat Farm
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.intelligentliving.co/vertical-farm-out-produces-flat-farm/
 
 
Researchers create new form of cultivated meat
 
Read more here:
 
https://phys.org/news/2021-01-cultivated-meat.html?fbclid=IwAR0ldDm8cDeEEjwLol-TmAAouk0-YVg01wad96MMwoD2dYAf4inPCM6wDqk
 
 
More about immigration and the social protection system..
 
I have just read the following article from United Nations:
 
Growing at a slower pace, world population is expected to reach 9.7
billion in 2050 and could peak at nearly 11 billion around 2100
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/world-population-prospects-2019.html
 
So notice that it says the following:
 
"Falling proportion of working-age population is putting pressure on
social protection systems
 
The potential support ratio, which compares numbers of persons at
working ages to those over age 65, is falling around the world. In Japan
this ratio is 1.8, the lowest in the world. An additional 29 countries,
mostly in Europe and the Caribbean, already have potential support
ratios below three. By 2050, 48 countries, mostly in Europe, Northern
America, and Eastern and South-Eastern Asia, are expected to have
potential support ratios below two. These low values underscore the
potential impact of population ageing on the labour market and economic
performance, as well as the fiscal pressures that many countries will
face in the coming decades as they seek to build and maintain public
systems of health care, pensions and social protection for older persons."
 
So this is why you have to read the following to understand more:
 
And I have just looked at this video of the french politician called
Jean-Marie Le Pen and he is saying in the video that with those flows of
immigrants in Europe that: "La 3ème Guerre mondiale est commencée", look
at the following video to notice it:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ene0hp7EAus
 
But i think that Jean-Marie Le Pen is "not" thinking correctly, because
if Western Europe wants to keep its social benefits, the countries of
the E.U. are going to need more workers. No place in the world has an
older population that's not into baby making than Europe, read more here
on Forbes to notice it:
 
Here's Why Europe Really Needs More Immigrants
 
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2017/08/15/heres-why-europe-really-needs-more-immigrants/#7319e2e24917
 
I have just read the following interesting article,
i invite you to read it carefully:
 
Does Our Survival Depend on Relentless Exponential Growth?
 
https://singularityhub.com/2017/10/11/do-we-need-relentless-exponential-growth-to-survive/
 
As you also notice that the article above says the following:
 
"There have concurrently been developments in agriculture and medicine
and, in the 20th century, the Green Revolution, in which Norman Borlaug
ensured that countries adopted high-yield varieties of crops—the first
precursors to modern ideas of genetically engineering food to produce
better crops and more growth. The world was able to produce an
astonishing amount of food—enough, in the modern era, for ten billion
people."
 
So i think that the world will be able to produce enough food for world
population in year 2100, since around 2100, the world population will
peak at nearly 11 billions, read the following article to notice it:
 
Growing at a slower pace, world population is expected to reach 9.7
billion in 2050 and could peak at nearly 11 billion around 2100
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/world-population-prospects-2019.html
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 21 03:02PM -0800

Hello,
 
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
 
Antiaging Gene Therapies Extend Lifespan of Mice by 41%
 
"If humans experienced the same antiaging effect as the mice then humans would live to a median age of 100 with these treatments."
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2021/07/antiaging-gene-therapies-extend-lifespan-of-mice-by-41.html#more-171929
 
And read carefully my following thoughts about Nanotechnology and about Exponential Progress:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 21 02:59PM -0800

Hello,
 
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
 
The future looks bright for infinitely recyclable plastic
 
Read more here:
 
https://phys.org/news/2021-04-future-bright-infinitely-recyclable-plastic.html?fbclid=IwAR1BfGLCGVbvgnzz75mM1SUvEuJ_54IdsG6EaVblEKRNmc5LBEPXe4TWoSE
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 21 02:58PM -0800

Hello,
 
 
More of my philosophy about obesity and about depression and more..
 
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
 
More of my philosophy about Potential strategies for fighting obesity and cancer and depression and more..
 
Here is another news that talks about a new kind of Potential strategy for fighting obesity:
 
Potential strategy for fighting obesity
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/11/211102125506.htm
 
More of my philosophy about Obesity that is a grave public health threat in USA..
 
Please read below my just new news about Scientists that discover the switch that makes human brown fat burn energy that can solve the problem of obesity crisis in USA:
 
Obesity is a grave public health threat in USA, more serious even than the opioid epidemic.
 
And you can read about it here:
 
Rising Obesity in the United States Is a Public Health Crisis
 
https://www.commonwealthfund.org/blog/2018/rising-obesity-united-states-public-health-crisis
 
 
So i think that it can be solved by the following:
 
 
Scientists discover the switch that makes human brown fat burn energy
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/08/200805102023.htm
 
 
And it can also be solved by the following:
 
 
And Sweat Away Fat to Fix Obesity
 
"The University of Pennsylvania looking for a diabetes treatment have accidentally developed an innovative, even revolutionary treatment for weight loss. Treating obese mice with the cytokine known as TSLP led to significant abdominal fat and weight loss compared to controls.."
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2021/09/sweat-away-fat-to-fix-obesity.html#more-173134
 
And it can also be solved by the following:
 
"Researchers found that daily supplementation of vitamin C (500 mg/day, time-released) reduced ET-1-related vessel constriction as much as walking for exercise did. Vitamin C supplementation represents an effective lifestyle strategy for reducing ET-1-mediated vessel constriction in overweight and obese adults, the researchers wrote."
 
Read more here:
 
Vitamin C: The exercise replacement?
 
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/09/150904144604.htm#:~:text=09%2F150904144604.htm-,Exercise%20improves%20health%20in%20overweight%20and%20obese%20adults%20but%20can,regular%20exercise%20in%20these%20adults.
 
More of my philosophy about Metformin and more..
 
I invite you to read carefully all my following thoughts and news:
 
Is metformin a wonder drug?
 
Metformin's benefits may extend far beyond diabetes, since it prevents cardiovascular disease and it lowers the risk of cancer(read the proof here: https://cancerci.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12935-021-01921-z), and it slows aging, prevent age-related disease, and increase lifespan.
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/is-metformin-a-wonder-drug-202109222605
 
And more precision about I3C (Indole-3-carbinol) and cancer..
 
I have just read the following article, i invite you to read it:
 
Broccoli and Brussels sprouts: Cancer foes
 
https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2019/05/beth-israel-researchers-uncover-anti-cancer-drug-mechanism-in-broccoli/
 
But i think that the above article is not speaking about the following
research that says the following about I3C (Indole-3-carbinol):
 
"In vivo studies showed that I3C inhibits the development of different
cancers in several animals when given before or in parallel to a
carcinogen. However, when I3C was given to the animals after the
carcinogen, I3C promoted carcinogenesis. This concern regarding the
long-term effects of I3C treatment on cancer risk in humans resulted in
some caution in the use of I3C as a dietary supplement in cancer
management protocols"
 
Read more here to notice it:
 
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989150/
 
So i don't advice to take I3C(Indole-3-carbinol) as a dietary
supplement, because I3C(Indole-3-carbinol) can reduce the risk of cancer
, but still you can have cancer even if you take I3C(Indole-3-carbinol)
, so it is dangerous to take I3C(Indole-3-carbinol) because taking
I3C(Indole-3-carbinol) after the carcinogen promotes carcinogenesis(read
my writing above to notice it).
 
Antiaging Gene Therapies Extend Lifespan of Mice by 41%
 
"If humans experienced the same antiaging effect as the mice then humans would live to a median age of 100 with these treatments."
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2021/07/antiaging-gene-therapies-extend-lifespan-of-mice-by-41.html#more-171929
 
And read carefully the following interesting article from ScienceDaily:
 
Scientists claim that overeating is not the primary cause of obesity
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/09/210913135729.htm
 
And reducing sugar in packaged foods can prevent disease in millions
 
Cutting 20 percent of sugar from packaged foods and 40 percent from beverages could prevent 2.48 million cardiovascular disease events (such as strokes, heart attacks, cardiac arrests), 490,000 cardiovascular deaths, and 750,000 diabetes cases in the U.S. over the lifetime of the adult population, according to a new study.
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/08/210827082431.htm
 
Experimental depression treatment is nearly 80% effective in controlled study
 
Read more here:
 
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2021-11-experimental-depression-treatment-effective.html?fbclid=IwAR2ZDDJyGyJhxYgjBUnhGBIlHSl88FPpBfclIORf3ulFnCZzmNsRJbzJzXU
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 21 02:56PM -0800

Hello,
 
 
More of my philosophy about nuclear fusion and more..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
 
Google's DeepMind AI can now control superheated plasma in a nuclear fusion reactor
 
Read more here:
 
https://interestingengineering.com/google-ai-controls-plasma
 
And Breakthrough at the ITER Fusion Reactor Paves Way for Energy Source That May Alter the Course of Civilization
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.newsweek.com/breakthrough-iter-fusion-reactor-paves-way-energy-source-that-may-alter-course-civilization-1507324
 
Japan's nuclear fusion startup is building a 'carbon-neutral society'
 
Read more here:
 
https://interestingengineering.com/japan-just-took-one-step-closer-to-viable-nuclear-fusion-power
 
And Fusion Scientists Make 'Burning Plasma' Breakthrough With 129-Laser Experiment, in what is a crucial step towards net fusion energy.
 
Read more here:
 
https://interestingengineering.com/fusion-scientists-make-burning-plasma-breakthrough-with-129-laser-experiment
 
And read the following:
 
And General Fusion Raised US$130 Million for Demo Nuclear Fusion Plant Around 2025
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2021/12/demonuclearfusion2025.html
 
Compact Nuclear Fusion Reactor Is 'Very Likely to Work,' Studies Suggest
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/29/climate/nuclear-fusion-reactor.html
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 21 02:55PM -0800

Hello,
 
 
More of my philosophy about hydrogen-powered electric car and about hydrogen and more..
 
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
 
A new method quickly extracts 90% of hydrogen from aluminum
 
Read more here:
 
https://interestingengineering.com/method-hydrogen-from-aluminum
 
New Nanoscale Material Harvests Hydrogen Fuel From the Sea
 
Read more here:
 
https://interestingengineering.com/new-nanoscale-material-can-harvest-hydrogen-fuel-from-the-sea
 
This hydrogen paste has a similar range to that of gasoline and could revolutionize the transport industry
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.businessinsider.com/car-bike-tesla-amazon-gates-bezos-climate-change-fuel-drone-2021-2?r=US&IR=T&fbclid=IwAR3zZ_fb7ko5OwIdLoiiKXxbPfjeHyMJwWMVG8MbLs15Pf2VcLwqVErqkJI
 
More of my philosophy about hydrogen-powered electric car and more..
 
I think that Renewable energy sources account for about 12% of total U.S. energy consumption and about 20% of electricity generation, and an Australian solar company has just developed the world's most efficient commercial-sized solar cell with 25.54 percent efficiency, accomplishing a significant jump from the previous record of 25.26 percent, read about it here:
 
Australia Created the Most Efficient Solar Cell Ever. With No Silver
 
Read more here:
 
https://interestingengineering.com/australia-created-the-most-efficient-solar-cell-ever-with-no-silver
 
And with the hydrogen-powered electric car, the losses are significantly greater: 45 percent of the energy is already lost during the production of hydrogen through electrolysis. Of this remaining 55 percent of the original energy, another 55 percent is lost when hydrogen is converted into electricity in the vehicle. This means that the hydrogen-powered electric car only achieves an efficiency of between 25 to 35 percent, depending on the model. For the sake of completeness: when alternative fuels are burned, the efficiency is even worse: only 10 to 20 percent overall efficiency, read more here so that to notice it:
 
https://www.volkswagenag.com/en/news/stories/2019/08/hydrogen-or-battery--that-is-the-question.html
 
But i think that the efficiency producing hydrogen is getting much better with the following invention of a New Electrocatalyst that Massively Improves the Commercial Viability of Green Hydrogen:
 
A New Electrocatalyst Massively Improves the Commercial Viability of Green Hydrogen
 
Read more here:
 
https://interestingengineering.com/a-new-electrocatalyst-massively-improves-the-commercial-viability-of-green-hydrogen
 
Toyota and Yamaha join forces to develop hydrogen-fueled V8 engine
Could this be the hydrogen breakthrough we have been waiting for?
 
Read more here:
 
https://interestingengineering.com/toyota-yamaha-hydrogen-engine
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 21 02:32PM -0800

Hello,
 
 
More of my philosophy about timesharing and about coroutines and more..
 
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
 
I think i am smart, i invite you to read my thoughts about timesharing
and coroutines in my following thoughts:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/tN_O-AgkGjY
 
And you can read more about my education and my way of doing here:
 
Here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable
algorithms and algorithms:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k
 
And you can take a look at my photo that i have just put
here in my website(I am 53 years old):
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/jackson-network-problem
 
And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence and evolutionary
algorithms in artificial intelligence so that you understand more:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0
 
And read my following thoughts of my philosophy about what is smartness:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Wzf6AOl41xs
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Monday, February 21, 2022

Digest for comp.programming.threads@googlegroups.com - 3 updates in 3 topics

Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 20 03:37PM -0800

Hello,
 
 
More of my philosophy about towards a common Artificial Intelligence strategy for Arab States and more..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
 
I think i am smart, and i say that Arab world of arab countries is
being smart, since it is adapting quickly to artificial intelligence as the utilization of Artificial Intelligence in the different sectors such as agriculture, water, environment, healthcare and infrastructure is significantly growing in Arab world of arab countries, so there remains that Arab world of arab countries has to invest much more in Digital and AI(artificial intelligence) literacy and of course the Arab world of arab countries is wanting to bring AI researchers in the Arab Region together with a new hub, and it is wanting to encourage learning and sharing knowledge between countries and building a robust infrastructure with skilled people to support the use and development of AI, so as you notice that the Arab world of arab countries is wanting to make itself a kind of self-sufficiency in AI experts, and then it is wanting to double the annual economic growth rates with artificial intelligence,
since as i just said that Accenture research on the impact of AI in 12 developed economies reveals that AI could double annual economic growth rates in 2030 by changing the nature of work and creating a new relationship between man and machine. The impact of AI technologies on business is projected to increase labor productivity by up to 40 percent and enable people to make more efficient use of their time, so i invite you to read the following article about the Arab world of arab countries and about artificial intelligence and read carefully in the following article what is saying Dr. Golestan Radwan, Advisor to the Minister for Artificial Intelligence (AI) at the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology in Egypt and what i saying Rehab Alarfaj, Strategic Advisor at the Saudi Authority for Data and Artificial Intelligence in Saudi Arabia:
 
https://en.unesco.org/news/towards-common-artificial-intelligence-strategy-arab-states-digital-inclusion-week-2021
 
More of my philosophy about artificial intelligence and about the Digital and AI literacy and more..
 
I think i am smart, so i have to make it much more clear, so i think that the global cloud services market was valued at $325,689 million in 2019, and is projected to reach $1,620,597 million by 2030, and i think that the global Software as a Service (SaaS) market is expected to grow from $192.1 billion in 2019 to $253 billion in 2023, but i think that the best of the best is AI (artificial intelligence) that could double annual economic growth rates in 2030 by changing the nature of work and creating a new relationship between man and machine. And the impact of AI technologies on business is projected to increase labor productivity by up to 40 percent and enable people to make more efficient use of their time, so i think that the best way to keep the talented AI experts and to make artificial intelligence double annual economic growth rates is to efficiently invest in Digital and AI literacy, so read my following thoughts about Canada so that to understand:
 
More of my philosophy about Digital and AI literacy and more..
 
I think Canada still has a problem, since it has to invest much
more in Digital and AI literacy, so read the following article so that
to understand the great importance of Digital and AI literacy:
 
"Digital and AI literacy is of utmost importance to help Canadian businesses scale and compete internationally. Investing in widespread digital and AI literacy for the entire population will increase domestic demand for technology and technology jobs. A technologically literate population will create more data, which fuels AI and thus the data-driven economy as a whole. It is also necessary for workers to be able to upskill and re-skill in order to remain productive and competitive in an automated workforce. Canadian businesses that adopt AI technology will save from lower production costs, have increased output, and be able to invest more. Increased revenue from this domestic demand, as well as Canada's global reputation for responsible AI, will help Canadian businesses scale globally and compete on the international level. Canada has a promising future in the data-driven economy, and strategic choices by policymakers are necessary to ensure that Canadians can benefit from an ethical and thriving AI ecosystem."
 
Read more here:
 
Canada's Economic Future with Artificial Intelligence
 
https://www.kroegerpolicyreview.com/post/canada-s-economic-future-with-artificial-intelligence
 
And here is my following thoughts about artificial intelligence and evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0
 
More of my philosophy about artificial intelligence and about economic growth and more..
 
I think i am smart, and i am noticing that the following thoughts
of the following webpage below about artificial intelligence says the following:
 
"Compelling data reveal a discouraging truth about growth today. There has been a marked decline in the ability of traditional levers of production capital investment and labor to propel economic growth."
 
And it it says the following:
 
"Accenture research on the impact of AI in 12 developed economies reveals that AI could double annual economic growth rates in 2035 by changing the nature of work and creating a new relationship between man and machine. The impact of AI technologies on business is projected to increase labor productivity by up to 40 percent and enable people to make more efficient use of their time."
 
Read more here so that to notice it:
 
https://www.accenture.com/ca-en/insight-artificial-intelligence-future-growth-canada
 
So it is in accordance with my previous thoughts below that
say the following:
 
More of my philosophy about budget spending and about the deficit and about debt-to-GDP ratio and more..
 
I think i am smart, and i am still inventing my thoughts about budget spending and about the deficit and about debt-to-GDP ratio, so i think
that the budget spending in its current form in USA is not able
to higher much more economic growth in an appreciable way, so i think that the best way is to wait for artificial intelligence that will enhance much more the situation, read what says McKinsey about it below, so i think with artificial intelligence and with some form of smart budget cuts etc., USA will be able to mitigate much more the problem of deficit and debt-to-GDP ratio, so i think that we have not to be pessimistic about USA, and i think that we have to be optimistic about Canada too, and here is more proof about what i am saying:
 
McKinsey estimates that AI(Artificial intelligence) may deliver an additional economic output of around US$13 trillion by 2030, increasing global GDP by about 1.2 % annually. This will mainly come from substitution of labour by automation and increased innovation in products and services.
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2019/637967/EPRS_BRI(2019)637967_EN.pdf
 
More of my philosophy about the deficit and about debt-to-GDP ratio and more..
 
I think i am smart, and i say that looking only at the debt-to-GDP ratio
is not sufficient so that to say that there is problem, since if you look at Quebec and Canada , even with the Covis-19 crisis , Canada and Quebec are keeping there deficits under control with smaller deficits,
so we can then say that as soon as this crisis of Covid-19 will end , so Canada and Quebec will keep the deficits under control, so i think that
the future of Canada and Quebec will be good if there deficit will be
successfully kept under control, and i think that they are smart and they will keep the deficit successfully under control , so we have to be optimistic about Canada and Quebec.
 
You can read the following about Quebec so that to notice it:
 
https://thoughtleadership.rbc.com/quebec-to-spend-more-cuts-its-deficit-as-economy-rebounds/
 
And you can read this about Canada so that to notice it:
 
Canada sees smaller budget deficit, pushes promised spending to budget
 
https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/canada-outline-new-forecasts-fiscal-situation-inflation-surges-2021-12-14/
 
 
So in my following previous thoughts, USA is not keeping the deficit under control and will not keep the deficit under control as Canada is doing, so then USA has a problem, read my following previous thoughts so that to notice:
 
And read my previous thoughts:
 
Canada's debt-to-GDP ratio is alarming
 
Read more here:
 
Canada's debt-to-GDP ratio is alarming. What happened the last time we were in this situation?
 
https://www.thestar.com/business/opinion/2021/02/01/canadas-debt-to-gdp-ratio-is-alarming-what-happened-the-last-time-we-were-in-this-situation.html
 
 
More of my philosophy about the debt-to-GDP ratio of USA and more..
 
In USA, with a current debt-to-GDP ratio of 127%, which is expected to rise to 277% by 2029, future economic growth of USA will not be as robust as it has been in the past.
 
Read more here so that to notice it:
 
U.S. National Debt Expected To Approach $89 Trillion By 2029
 
https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikepatton/2021/05/03/us-national-debt-expected-to-approach-89-trillion-by-2029/?sh=1ca3b0555f13
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 20 12:13PM -0800

Hello,
 
 
More of my philosophy about the WeAreDevelopers World Congress..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
 
"After two long years the global developer community meets once again in Berlin to connect with peers and get recent insights on software development, best practices and future tech trends.

Once again we will bring together the world's greatest minds in tech to show all the possibilities and opportunities that modern software development offers. WeAreDevelopers World Congress is the place where we share our experiences to become better professionals and level up our skills in order to create incredible things as developers and tech experts.
 
We are building the most exciting speaker line-up a developer conference has ever had (stay tuned). Expect two days full of knowledge, insights, fun and most importantly - an awesome community of developers and IT professionals."
 
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.wearedevelopers.com/world-congress?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fba&utm_campaign=fba&hsa_acc=249687502199872&hsa_cam=23848711341480407&hsa_grp=23849249387450407&hsa_ad=23849249387440407&hsa_src=fb&hsa_net=facebook&hsa_ver=3&fbclid=IwAR0sTfXWALbuOWHpBFCaKF-3zIhZQTl53ZlSpOUN33LJPKNAPXGWPieufhM#/
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 20 12:00PM -0800

Hello,
 
 
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
 
What Is GPT-3 And Why Is It Revolutionizing Artificial Intelligence?
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2020/10/05/what-is-gpt-3-and-why-is-it-revolutionizing-artificial-intelligence/?sh=25eeccc9481a
 
 
And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence and evolutionary
algorithms in artificial intelligence so that you understand more:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0
 
And read my following thoughts of my philosophy about what is smartness:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Wzf6AOl41xs
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Sunday, February 20, 2022

Fwd: 夜來香



Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

From: Sharon Kahn <sharon62kahn@gmail.com>
Date: February 19, 2022 at 12:52:42 PM CST
Subject: Fwd: 夜來香





Subject: Fwd: 夜來香

Saturday, February 19, 2022

Digest for comp.programming.threads@googlegroups.com - 9 updates in 6 topics

Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 18 05:21PM -0800

Hello,
 
 
More of my precision about high cost of private colleges and universities in USA and more..
 
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
 
So i think i am smart and i say that the problem of high cost of private colleges and universities in USA is due to the law of supply and demand in economics, so it is the capitalistic way of doing, and it is also due to the high cost of services offered by private colleges or universities and it is also due to the fact that colleges in USA are offering too much and a lot of services to students so that to "attract" students, so it is the "capitalistic" way of doing, so a part of the students pay for this or that service, but all the students have to pay for the workers and the maintenance and such of those services even if they are not paying and benefiting from those services, so i think it is also making the college tuition in USA more expensive, and we have not to forget that inflation too can make the tuition more expensive, and this is why i have also just said the following:
 
I think i am smart and i think that the main problem of why
private colleges and universities of USA are so expensive is
that it is a product of the capitalism way of doing, so it is
the product of supply and demand, since as more people seek a private colleges or universities degree, schools can charge more for tuition, and when enrollment drops, private colleges or universities may raise tuition to make up for financial shortfalls. Since there is a law of economics that says the following:
 
"The law of supply and demand is an economic theory that explains how supply and demand are related to each other and how that relationship affects the price of goods and services. It's a fundamental economic principle that when supply exceeds demand for a good or service, prices fall. When demand exceeds supply, prices tend to rise."
 
And notice that even MIT(Massachusetts Institute of Technology) is now an independent, coeducational, "privately" endowed university organized into five schools (architecture and planning; engineering; humanities, arts, and social sciences; management; science).
 
More of my philosophy about the tuition of full price to attend MIT and more..
 
I think i am smart, and i i invite you to read the following
about MIT(Massachusetts Institute of Technology):
 
"The full price to attend MIT for the 2019–2020 academic year is $73,160. ⁠ This total costs includes $53,450 for tuition, $10,430 for housing, $5,960 for food costs, $2,160 for personal expenses, $820 for books and supplies and $340 to cover the school's student life fee."
 
So i have just discovered another pattern with my fluid intelligence,
and it is that since MIT is so expensive, i think that MIT is for the highly smart people of 125 IQ or above, since i think if you are only of 115 IQ or 120 IQ you will have some difficulties or problems to pay the student loans that permit you to pay for the so expensive MIT. So i think that the other US universities that looks like MIT, like Harvard and Stanford, have the same requirement.
 
More of my philosophy about another IQ test for the highly smart..
 
Here is another problem in form of an IQ test for the highly smart,
so look at the following video about the student loans in USA:
 
Student Loans: The Most Evil Business in the World
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9QT5sj1lAk
 
And read the following of why is college tuition in the US so expensive?
 
https://www.gobankingrates.com/saving-money/education/why-is-college-tuition-in-us-so-expensive/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CIn%20general%2C%20rising%20costs%20of,resource%20platform%20called%20Access%20Scholarships.
 
More of my philosophy about an IQ test for the highly smart and more..
 
I think i am really smart and here is a smart IQ test for the highly smart:
 
So notice what is saying in the following video the known Garry Tan that is an asian from USA about the how to become rich and notice that he attended Stanford University from 1999 to 2003, and graduated with a bachelor's degree in Computer Systems Engineering:
 
So I invite you to look at his following video that speaks
about how to become rich:
 
STOP Chasing Money -- Chase WEALTH. | How To get RICH | Garry Tan's Office
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t
 
The person that is speaking on the above video is called Garry Tan,
and here he is:
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garry_Tan
 
And I think i am smart and i invite you to look at the following
"defect" or "bug" of the above video, look here at what he is saying:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t=425s
 
So notice that he is saying that so that to become rich you have to be the following:
 
"So what is most useful, is actually acquiring skills that nobody else
has, especially in combination that are rare. If you can rebound the
ball and nobody does it quite the way you can, you can be a Hall of Fame
basketball player. And that applies to all the things in your career and
in life."
 
But it is like an IQ test for the highly smart, since i am quickly discovering a pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is that he is trying to abstract the way of becoming rich by also saying:
 
"If you can rebound the ball and nobody does it quite the way you can, you can be a Hall of Fame basketball player. And that applies to all the things in your career and in life."
 
But the pattern that i am quickly discovering with my fluid intelligence is that even if you can rebound the ball and nobody does it quite the way you can, the becoming rich is also not only dependent on the supply but also on the "demand", so if the demand doesn't want to give you enough money so that to become rich , you will still not become rich,
so if you are smart you will also notice that it is also about usefulness, since the demand can find the giving enough money to make
you rich not useful for his pocket, so Garry Tan in the above saying of the video is not so smart, since he is not taking into account the factor that we call usefulness to consumers. So the person on the above video has forgot the very basis of what is it of something has to be useful for the consumers or customers, so read my following smart "redefinition" of Utilitarianism so that to understand:
 
More of my philosophy about why the definition of Utilitarianism is like
an IQ test..
 
Notice that i think i am smart, since when i just looked rapidly at the
definition below of Utilitarianism, i have rapidly discovered a pattern
with my fluid intelligence and it is that even if the definition
of Utilitarianism is: That Utilitarianism prescribes actions that
maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
i can easily see a pattern with my fluid intelligence since i am
smart, since the pattern is that Utilitarianism maximises happiness and
well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future, i mean that responability
is inherent to the definition since the well balancing forces us
to be responsability in the present or today so that to maximize
correctly happiness and well being tomorrow or in the future.
 
I think i am really smart, and what i am trying to explain is that
you have first to know that a language is also an abstraction of the reality, since even a concept is an abstraction of the reality and also
a language is full of concepts, and not only that but a very important
thing in the process of thinking is that you have to know how to
make a difference between what we call in french: "La pensée duale" et
"La pensée multimodale", and it means in english: that there is a thinking that is like a boolean logical of thinking and there is a more efficient thinking that comes with precision in form of nuances etc.
and it is the weakness of the above abstraction of the known Garry Tan,
since his abstraction of how to become rich doesn't come with the right precision and the right nuances, since notice that the becoming rich depends not only on the supply but also on the demand and the demand can be influenced by other factors such as Covid-19 or the like that prevent
from making rich an individual or individuals in the supply, so
it is why i say that the known Garry Tan above is not so smart.
 
 
I can give you another IQ test that i have rapidly invented and
here it is:
 
So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid
intelligence that permits to understand, here it is:
 
So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country
called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ?
 
It is like my IQ test..
 
So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go
fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need
the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be
"reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has
too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take
into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so
you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan.
 
More precision of my philosophy about Utilitarianism..
 
I invite you to read the following definition of what is Utilitarianism:
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism
 
So as you are noticing, it says that Utilitarianism prescribes actions
that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
but i think that Utilitarianism is not idiotic since it maximises
happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future.
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 18 04:53PM -0800

Hello,
 
 
 
 
More of my philosophy about the high cost of private colleges and universities in USA and more..
 
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
 
I think i am smart and i think that the main problem of why
private colleges and universities of USA are so expensive is
that it is a product of the capitalism way of doing, so it is
the product of supply and demand, since as more people seek a private colleges or universities degree, schools can charge more for tuition, and when enrollment drops, private colleges or universities may raise tuition to make up for financial shortfalls. Since there is a law of economics that says the following:
 
"The law of supply and demand is an economic theory that explains how supply and demand are related to each other and how that relationship affects the price of goods and services. It's a fundamental economic principle that when supply exceeds demand for a good or service, prices fall. When demand exceeds supply, prices tend to rise."
 
And notice that even MIT(Massachusetts Institute of Technology) is now an independent, coeducational, "privately" endowed university organized into five schools (architecture and planning; engineering; humanities, arts, and social sciences; management; science).
 
More of my philosophy about the tuition of full price to attend MIT and more..
 
I think i am smart, and i i invite you to read the following
about MIT(Massachusetts Institute of Technology):
 
"The full price to attend MIT for the 2019–2020 academic year is $73,160. ⁠ This total costs includes $53,450 for tuition, $10,430 for housing, $5,960 for food costs, $2,160 for personal expenses, $820 for books and supplies and $340 to cover the school's student life fee."
 
So i have just discovered another pattern with my fluid intelligence,
and it is that since MIT is so expensive, i think that MIT is for the highly smart people of 125 IQ or above, since i think if you are only of 115 IQ or 120 IQ you will have some difficulties or problems to pay the student loans that permit you to pay for the so expensive MIT. So i think that the other US universities that looks like MIT, like Harvard and Stanford, have the same requirement.
 
More of my philosophy about another IQ test for the highly smart..
 
Here is another problem in form of an IQ test for the highly smart,
so look at the following video about the student loans in USA:
 
Student Loans: The Most Evil Business in the World
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9QT5sj1lAk
 
And read the following of why is college tuition in the US so expensive?
 
https://www.gobankingrates.com/saving-money/education/why-is-college-tuition-in-us-so-expensive/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CIn%20general%2C%20rising%20costs%20of,resource%20platform%20called%20Access%20Scholarships.
 
 
So i think that the problem above is like an IQ test for the highly smart, since i think that the pattern that i am discovering with my fluid intelligence is that colleges in USA are offering too much and a lot of services to students so that to "attract" students, so it is the "capitalistic" way of doing, so a part of the students pay for those services, but all the students have to pay for the workers and the maintenance and such of those services even if they are not paying and benefiting from those services, so i think it is making the college tuition in USA too much expensive, so i think it is the main problem of why college tuition in the US so expensive, and it has created the student Loans problem in USA.
 
More of my philosophy about an IQ test for the highly smart and more..
 
I think i am really smart and here is a smart IQ test for the highly smart:
 
So notice what is saying in the following video the known Garry Tan that is an asian from USA about the how to become rich and notice that he attended Stanford University from 1999 to 2003, and graduated with a bachelor's degree in Computer Systems Engineering:
 
So I invite you to look at his following video that speaks
about how to become rich:
 
STOP Chasing Money -- Chase WEALTH. | How To get RICH | Garry Tan's Office
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t
 
The person that is speaking on the above video is called Garry Tan,
and here he is:
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garry_Tan
 
And I think i am smart and i invite you to look at the following
"defect" or "bug" of the above video, look here at what he is saying:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t=425s
 
So notice that he is saying that so that to become rich you have to be the following:
 
"So what is most useful, is actually acquiring skills that nobody else
has, especially in combination that are rare. If you can rebound the
ball and nobody does it quite the way you can, you can be a Hall of Fame
basketball player. And that applies to all the things in your career and
in life."
 
But it is like an IQ test for the highly smart, since i am quickly discovering a pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is that he is trying to abstract the way of becoming rich by also saying:
 
"If you can rebound the ball and nobody does it quite the way you can, you can be a Hall of Fame basketball player. And that applies to all the things in your career and in life."
 
But the pattern that i am quickly discovering with my fluid intelligence is that even if you can rebound the ball and nobody does it quite the way you can, the becoming rich is also not only dependent on the supply but also on the "demand", so if the demand doesn't want to give you enough money so that to become rich , you will still not become rich,
so if you are smart you will also notice that it is also about usefulness, since the demand can find the giving enough money to make
you rich not useful for his pocket, so Garry Tan in the above saying of the video is not so smart, since he is not taking into account the factor that we call usefulness to consumers. So the person on the above video has forgot the very basis of what is it of something has to be useful for the consumers or customers, so read my following smart "redefinition" of Utilitarianism so that to understand:
 
More of my philosophy about why the definition of Utilitarianism is like
an IQ test..
 
Notice that i think i am smart, since when i just looked rapidly at the
definition below of Utilitarianism, i have rapidly discovered a pattern
with my fluid intelligence and it is that even if the definition
of Utilitarianism is: That Utilitarianism prescribes actions that
maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
i can easily see a pattern with my fluid intelligence since i am
smart, since the pattern is that Utilitarianism maximises happiness and
well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future, i mean that responability
is inherent to the definition since the well balancing forces us
to be responsability in the present or today so that to maximize
correctly happiness and well being tomorrow or in the future.
 
I think i am really smart, and what i am trying to explain is that
you have first to know that a language is also an abstraction of the reality, since even a concept is an abstraction of the reality and also
a language is full of concepts, and not only that but a very important
thing in the process of thinking is that you have to know how to
make a difference between what we call in french: "La pensée duale" et
"La pensée multimodale", and it means in english: that there is a thinking that is like a boolean logical of thinking and there is a more efficient thinking that comes with precision in form of nuances etc.
and it is the weakness of the above abstraction of the known Garry Tan,
since his abstraction of how to become rich doesn't come with the right precision and the right nuances, since notice that the becoming rich depends not only on the supply but also on the demand and the demand can be influenced by other factors such as Covid-19 or the like that prevent
from making rich an individual or individuals in the supply, so
it is why i say that the known Garry Tan above is not so smart.
 
 
I can give you another IQ test that i have rapidly invented and
here it is:
 
So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid
intelligence that permits to understand, here it is:
 
So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country
called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ?
 
It is like my IQ test..
 
So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go
fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need
the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be
"reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has
too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take
into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so
you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan.
 
More precision of my philosophy about Utilitarianism..
 
I invite you to read the following definition of what is Utilitarianism:
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism
 
So as you are noticing, it says that Utilitarianism prescribes actions
that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
but i think that Utilitarianism is not idiotic since it maximises
happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future.
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 18 02:38PM -0800

Hello,
 
 
More of my philosophy about another IQ test for the highly smart..
 
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
 
Here is another problem in form of an IQ test for the highly smart,
so look at the following video about the student loans in USA:
 
Student Loans: The Most Evil Business in the World
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9QT5sj1lAk
 
And read the following of why is college tuition in the US so expensive?
 
https://www.gobankingrates.com/saving-money/education/why-is-college-tuition-in-us-so-expensive/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CIn%20general%2C%20rising%20costs%20of,resource%20platform%20called%20Access%20Scholarships.
 
 
So i think that the problem above is like an IQ test for the highly smart, since i think that the pattern that i am discovering with my fluid intelligence is that colleges in USA are offering too much and a lot of services to students so that to "attract" students, so it is the "capitalistic" way of doing, so a part of the students pay for those services, but all the students have to pay for the workers and the maintenance and such of those services even if they are not paying and benefiting from those services, so i think it is making the college tuition in USA too much expensive, so i think it is the main problem of why college tuition in the US so expensive, and it has created the student Loans problem in USA.
 
More of my philosophy about an IQ test for the highly smart and more..
 
I think i am really smart and here is a smart IQ test for the highly smart:
 
So notice what is saying in the following video the known Garry Tan that is an asian from USA about the how to become rich and notice that he attended Stanford University from 1999 to 2003, and graduated with a bachelor's degree in Computer Systems Engineering:
 
So I invite you to look at his following video that speaks
about how to become rich:
 
STOP Chasing Money -- Chase WEALTH. | How To get RICH | Garry Tan's Office
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t
 
The person that is speaking on the above video is called Garry Tan,
and here he is:
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garry_Tan
 
And I think i am smart and i invite you to look at the following
"defect" or "bug" of the above video, look here at what he is saying:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t=425s
 
So notice that he is saying that so that to become rich you have to be the following:
 
"So what is most useful, is actually acquiring skills that nobody else
has, especially in combination that are rare. If you can rebound the
ball and nobody does it quite the way you can, you can be a Hall of Fame
basketball player. And that applies to all the things in your career and
in life."
 
But it is like an IQ test for the highly smart, since i am quickly discovering a pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is that he is trying to abstract the way of becoming rich by also saying:
 
"If you can rebound the ball and nobody does it quite the way you can, you can be a Hall of Fame basketball player. And that applies to all the things in your career and in life."
 
But the pattern that i am quickly discovering with my fluid intelligence is that even if you can rebound the ball and nobody does it quite the way you can, the becoming rich is also not only dependent on the supply but also on the "demand", so if the demand doesn't want to give you enough money so that to become rich , you will still not become rich,
so if you are smart you will also notice that it is also about usefulness, since the demand can find the giving enough money to make
you rich not useful for his pocket, so Garry Tan in the above saying of the video is not so smart, since he is not taking into account the factor that we call usefulness to consumers. So the person on the above video has forgot the very basis of what is it of something has to be useful for the consumers or customers, so read my following smart "redefinition" of Utilitarianism so that to understand:
 
More of my philosophy about why the definition of Utilitarianism is like
an IQ test..
 
Notice that i think i am smart, since when i just looked rapidly at the
definition below of Utilitarianism, i have rapidly discovered a pattern
with my fluid intelligence and it is that even if the definition
of Utilitarianism is: That Utilitarianism prescribes actions that
maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
i can easily see a pattern with my fluid intelligence since i am
smart, since the pattern is that Utilitarianism maximises happiness and
well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future, i mean that responability
is inherent to the definition since the well balancing forces us
to be responsability in the present or today so that to maximize
correctly happiness and well being tomorrow or in the future.
 
I think i am really smart, and what i am trying to explain is that
you have first to know that a language is also an abstraction of the reality, since even a concept is an abstraction of the reality and also
a language is full of concepts, and not only that but a very important
thing in the process of thinking is that you have to know how to
make a difference between what we call in french: "La pensée duale" et
"La pensée multimodale", and it means in english: that there is a thinking that is like a boolean logical of thinking and there is a more efficient thinking that comes with precision in form of nuances etc.
and it is the weakness of the above abstraction of the known Garry Tan,
since his abstraction of how to become rich doesn't come with the right precision and the right nuances, since notice that the becoming rich depends not only on the supply but also on the demand and the demand can be influenced by other factors such as Covid-19 or the like that prevent
from making rich an individual or individuals in the supply, so
it is why i say that the known Garry Tan above is not so smart.
 
 
I can give you another IQ test that i have rapidly invented and
here it is:
 
So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid
intelligence that permits to understand, here it is:
 
So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country
called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ?
 
It is like my IQ test..
 
So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go
fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need
the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be
"reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has
too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take
into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so
you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan.
 
More precision of my philosophy about Utilitarianism..
 
I invite you to read the following definition of what is Utilitarianism:
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism
 
So as you are noticing, it says that Utilitarianism prescribes actions
that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
but i think that Utilitarianism is not idiotic since it maximises
happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future.
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 18 01:13PM -0800

Hello,
 
More of my philosophy about the free market and the invisible hand and more..
 
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
 
The economists say the following:
 
"Free markets are theoretically optimal, with supply and demand guided by an invisible hand to allocate goods efficiently."
 
And about the invisible hand we have the following:
 
"Invisible hand, metaphor, introduced by the 18th-century Scottish philosopher and economist Adam Smith, that characterizes the mechanisms through which beneficial social and economic outcomes may arise from the accumulated self-interested actions of individuals, none of whom intends to bring about such outcomes."
 
I think i am really a smart guy, and i am noticing that the free market economy has some deficiencies, since i say that the self-interested actions of individuals in the invisible hand are not guarantied to be "competitive" or efficiently "competitive", so then i say that competitiveness is a problem in the free market, since i say that eventhough the Market equilibrium that is to attain a well balance between the supply and demand is realized, i think that the transitioning or time to a transitioning to a competitive economy remains the main problem, so it is why we are noticing that countries are still using some kind of economic protectionism. And you can easily notice it by looking at the following video of south Africa that also shows that south Africa is still using some kind of economic protectionism since it has not yet transitioned to a competitive economy, so here is the video:
 
It's time to move the needle on economic reform! - Dean Macpherson
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddO9clKJ5is
 
Also here is my new architectural idea of my philosophy:
 
An idea can be incomplete, and free incomplete ideas on internet are not a closed systems, since we are interacting with them, so you can complete an incomplete free idea on internet with another incomplete free idea on internet to make the interesting or the good creativity, and this process also humanize more the society by bringing much more compassion towards humans, since the interesting or good creativity also comes from free ideas on internet and i say that it is the weakness of the economist Adam Smith philosophy, since in economic Liberalism of Adam Smith, self-interest is most of the time regulated by competition to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, and self-interest and competition is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations, and Adam Smith described the opposing, but complementary forces of self-interest and competition as the invisible hand, it means that while producers and consumers are not acting with the intent of serving the needs of others or society, they do, since when you work, your goal is to earn money, but in the process you provide a valuable good or service that benefits others and society, so it is the basis of the following saying of Adam Smith: "Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations", but Adam Smith has not seen the how to become the much more "optimal" properity and happiness of nations using for example the free incomplete ideas on internet that makes the good creativity that also come from "solidarity"(and it is not egoism) of the free incomplete ideas on internet like i am explaining above with my architectural idea of my philosophy. So here is my example of my "creativity" of how i have completed efficiently some free software ideas on internet with my ideas , so it is my following opensource software project called StringTree, it was one of my first opensource software projects, so read about it carefully and download it so that you notice how i have done it smartly:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/stringtree
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 18 12:55PM -0800

Hello,
 
More of my philosophy about an IQ test for the highly smart and more..
 
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
 
I think i am really smart and here is a smart IQ test for the highly smart:
 
So notice what is saying in the following video the known Garry Tan that is an asian from USA about the how to become rich and notice that he attended Stanford University from 1999 to 2003, and graduated with a bachelor's degree in Computer Systems Engineering:
 
So I invite you to look at his following video that speaks
about how to become rich:
 
STOP Chasing Money -- Chase WEALTH. | How To get RICH | Garry Tan's Office
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t
 
The person that is speaking on the above video is called Garry Tan,
and here he is:
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garry_Tan
 
And I think i am smart and i invite you to look at the following
"defect" or "bug" of the above video, look here at what he is saying:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t=425s
 
So notice that he is saying that so that to become rich you have to be the following:
 
"So what is most useful, is actually acquiring skills that nobody else
has, especially in combination that are rare. If you can rebound the
ball and nobody does it quite the way you can, you can be a Hall of Fame
basketball player. And that applies to all the things in your career and
in life."
 
But it is like an IQ test for the highly smart, since i am quickly discovering a pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is that he is trying to abstract the way of becoming rich by also saying:
 
"If you can rebound the ball and nobody does it quite the way you can, you can be a Hall of Fame basketball player. And that applies to all the things in your career and in life."
 
But the pattern that i am quickly discovering with my fluid intelligence is that even if you can rebound the ball and nobody does it quite the way you can, the becoming rich is also not only dependent on the supply but also on the "demand", so if the demand doesn't want to give you enough money so that to become rich , you will still not become rich,
so if you are smart you will also notice that it is also about usefulness, since the demand can find the giving enough money to make
you rich not useful for his pocket, so Garry Tan in the above saying of the video is not so smart, since he is not taking into account the factor that we call usefulness to consumers. So the person on the above video has forgot the very basis of what is it of something has to be useful for the consumers or customers, so read my following smart "redefinition" of Utilitarianism so that to understand:
 
More of my philosophy about why the definition of Utilitarianism is like
an IQ test..
 
Notice that i think i am smart, since when i just looked rapidly at the
definition below of Utilitarianism, i have rapidly discovered a pattern
with my fluid intelligence and it is that even if the definition
of Utilitarianism is: That Utilitarianism prescribes actions that
maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
i can easily see a pattern with my fluid intelligence since i am
smart, since the pattern is that Utilitarianism maximises happiness and
well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future, i mean that responability
is inherent to the definition since the well balancing forces us
to be responsability in the present or today so that to maximize
correctly happiness and well being tomorrow or in the future.
 
I think i am really smart, and what i am trying to explain is that
you have first to know that a language is also an abstraction of the reality, since even a concept is an abstraction of the reality and also
a language is full of concepts, and not only that but a very important
thing in the process of thinking is that you have to know how to
make a difference between what we call in french: "La pensée duale" et
"La pensée multimodale", and it means in english: that there is a thinking that is like a boolean logical of thinking and there is a more efficient thinking that comes with precision in form of nuances etc.
and it is the weakness of the above abstraction of the known Garry Tan,
since his abstraction of how to become rich doesn't come with the right precision and the right nuances, since notice that the becoming rich depends not only on the supply but also on the demand and the demand can be influenced by other factors such as Covid-19 or the like that prevent
from making rich an individual or individuals in the supply, so
it is why i say that the known Garry Tan above is not so smart.
 
 
I can give you another IQ test that i have rapidly invented and
here it is:
 
So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid
intelligence that permits to understand, here it is:
 
So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country
called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ?
 
It is like my IQ test..
 
So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go
fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need
the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be
"reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has
too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take
into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so
you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan.
 
More precision of my philosophy about Utilitarianism..
 
I invite you to read the following definition of what is Utilitarianism:
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism
 
So as you are noticing, it says that Utilitarianism prescribes actions
that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
but i think that Utilitarianism is not idiotic since it maximises
happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future.
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 18 07:58AM -0800

On Friday, February 18, 2022 at 1:31:31 AM UTC-5, Bonita Montero wrote:
 
> > You have to understand Bonita that lockfree has advantages and disadvantages, so since lock-free queue works best when the queue nearly always has entries, ...
 
> This can't be guaranteed since the producer can be scheduled away.
> No one uses lock-free queues, they're simply silly.
 
 
I think you are not understanding, since you are trying to generalize more
and you are saying that it is not working, but it is not the right way ,
since you have to know how to fix the number of consumers and producers
so that it works. So when you are using lock-free queues you have to like
calculate more precisely like in realtime systems so that it be efficient.
 
And you have to know that when you fix correctly the number of consumers
and producers so that to be efficient, this "efficient" is not just about the throughput
of the lock-free queues, since i mean the even if you fix the number of consumers
and producers and it gives less throughput than the blocking queues , it can be that you
are wanting to benefit from some or all the characteristics of the being lock-free.
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>: Feb 18 05:41PM +0100

Am 18.02.2022 um 16:58 schrieb Amine Moulay Ramdane:
> and you are saying that it is not working, but it is not the right way ,
> since you have to know how to fix the number of consumers and producers
> so that it works. ..
 
The number of consumers and producers doesn't matter. If a producer
can be scheduled away a consumer would poll for a vers long time.
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 18 08:56AM -0800

On Friday, February 18, 2022 at 11:42:04 AM UTC-5, Bonita Montero wrote:
> > so that it works. ..
 
> The number of consumers and producers doesn't matter. If a producer
> can be scheduled away a consumer would poll for a vers long time.
 
I don't agree with you, since a non-blocking algorithm
is lock-free if there is guaranteed system-wide progress,
so if you fix correctly the number of consumers and producers,
and you have many more producers than one producer, so if
a producer is scheduled away , another producer will do the job rapidly,
since system-wide progress is guaranteed by the lock-free algorithm,
so i advice you to read more about what is lock-free algorithms.
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 18 12:50PM -0800

On Friday, February 18, 2022 at 11:42:04 AM UTC-5, Bonita Montero wrote:
> > so that it works. ..
 
> The number of consumers and producers doesn't matter. If a producer
> can be scheduled away a consumer would poll for a vers long time.
 
I think you are idiotic, since you are saying that you have
to use like an hybrid way of using blocking and lock-free, but it is an idiotic
way of doing since you will lose some important advantages of lock-free ,
so it is why i am not idiotically throwing away lock-free queues as you are
doing it, since i still want to take advantage of the characteristics of the
being lock-free, so you have to read my following other extended answer
so that you notice that operating systems schedulers such as Windows
and Linux are giving a big enough time slice that allows the next producer
to successfully put the item in the lock-free queue. So read my following
extended thoughts about it:
 
I say that eventhough the producer is scheduled away ,
you have to think about the big enough time slice that allows
the next producer to successfully put the item in the lock-free queue,
and as we know that each software thread gets a short turn,
called a time slice, to run on a hardware thread. When the time slice
runs out, the scheduler suspends the thread and allows the next
thread waiting its turn to run on the hardware thread. And time slicing
ensures that all software threads make some progress. And as we know
that there is the overhead of saving the register state of a thread when
suspending it, and restoring the state when resuming it.
You might be surprised how much state there is on modern processors.
However, schedulers typically allocate big enough time slices so that
the save/restore overheads are insignificant, so this obvious overhead
is in fact not much of a concern.
 
So you are like idiotic Bonita Montero, since it is as you are comparing
the locks that use CPU-intensive spinning and mutexes that don't use it,
so we can use CPU-intensive spinning if the critical section is small,
so it is by logical analogy the same as lock-free algorithms, since
lock-free algorithms need from you to control correctly the situation or
the context, i mean that you have to know how to tune the number of
threads of the system including the consumers and producers of the
lock-free queues so that to be able to benefit from advantages of the
being lock-free.
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.