Re: [jQuery] Re: Why mootools animations is more smooth than jquery?

That's certainly possible. Again, for me the animations provided by
jQuery have been great. I'd give you the same feedback in that if there
are issues, I'd urge you to see if you can pinpoint them and provide a
patch. That would be a great help to the project.

Rey...

Jonathan Vanherpe (T & T NV) wrote:
> I'm not trolling (at least today I'm not ;-)), but mootools' effects are
> smoother in at least some cases. I've switched to mootools for some
> websites just because of that, even though I really prefer working with
> jQuery.
>
> Try using scrollTo() diagonally in both frameworks to see one example
> (ofcourse, this might just be the scrollto plugin's fault).
>
> I refrained from replying because the OP seemed trollish, but he has a
> point, IMHO.
>
> Jonathan
>
> Rey Bango wrote:
>> LOL. :D
>>
>> Thanks Scott.
>>
>> Rey...
>>
>> Scott Sauyet wrote:
>>> On Dec 3, 11:02 am, Rey Bango <r...@reybango.com> wrote:
>>>> I think you should consider looking into this yourself. The animations
>>>> provided by jQuery, while basic, are quite smooth and perform well. If
>>>> you feel that the ones provided by MooTools perform better, then I
>>>> would
>>>> urge you to take the time to investigate it and consider offering
>>>> patches should you find a good solution.
>>>
>>> How does Rey do that?
>>>
>>> Twice I stopped my fingers over the "send" key on a "troll" message.
>>> I decided that ignoring it was my best bet.
>>>
>>> I never even considered trying to turn it into a positive suggestion.
>>>
>>> Sure, Rey, show us all up by being nicer! :-)
>>>
>>> -- Scott
>>>
>>
>
>