comp.lang.c++
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c++?hl=en
comp.lang.c++@googlegroups.com
Today's topics:
* STL::MAP: Printing values only once .. - 3 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c++/t/671080d0fc07abda?hl=en
* Boost - 6 messages, 5 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c++/t/81738d66827a11c8?hl=en
* The Beauties of Islam - 15 messages, 7 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c++/t/b79532a504d8f51e?hl=en
* Link object files from VC++ and GCC? - 2 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c++/t/d605f2ea0db15eb9?hl=en
==============================================================================
TOPIC: STL::MAP: Printing values only once ..
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c++/t/671080d0fc07abda?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 20 2014 1:02 pm
From: Jorgen Grahn
On Mon, 2014-01-20, Martijn Lievaart wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 17:01:36 +0000, Jorgen Grahn wrote:
...
>>> which is more or less guarenteed to be simpler than any C++ program
>>> doing the same task. :-)
>>
>> Yes. And next best is a C++ program using the same approach.
>> I got the impression that the original sucked up the whole input file
>> before extracting the information it wanted; that's slower and IME more
>> troublesome (harder to report syntax errors and so on).
>
> AFAIK splitting a string is still not in the standard library, so any C++
> solution is not as simple as a language that has a split/explode. (Please
> correct me if I'm wrong!)
I expect <regex> to have such things, but haven't checked. I keep my
own string splitter and some of the other Perl things I use the most,
e.g. 'while(<>)'.
Anyway, my comment above was not really about split; more about the
idiom of line-by-line text filters, versus pulling it all into some
data structure and /then/ processing it.
/Jorgen
--
// Jorgen Grahn <grahn@ Oo o. . .
\X/ snipabacken.se> O o .
== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 20 2014 2:01 pm
From: woodbrian77@gmail.com
On Friday, January 17, 2014 9:24:27 PM UTC-6, Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
>
>
> Using Boost is generally a good idea when you have it available,
I wouldn't go that far, but I do think parts of
Boost are great.
Brian
Ebenezer Enterprises -
http://webEbenezer.net
== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 20 2014 9:30 pm
From: Seungbeom Kim
On 2014-01-20 11:22, Martijn Lievaart wrote:
> The Perl equivalent:
>
> perl -p -F'|' -e 'print "$F[0] $F[6]"; exit if $.>2;'
OT, but let me correct some obvious errors:
perl -nl -aF'\|' -e 'print "$F[0] $F[6]"; exit if $.>2;'
--
Seungbeom Kim
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Boost
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c++/t/81738d66827a11c8?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 6 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 20 2014 1:37 pm
From: "J. Clarke"
In article <lbk1c9$8sl$1@speranza.aioe.org>, bobhaa@djea.org says...
>
> J. Clarke wrote:
>
> > You seem to be stuck in the 32-bit era when addressing anything beyond 4
> > GB meant using smoke and mirrors. While NUMA is a worthwhile
> > performance booster in some cases, it is certainly not _necessary_ in
> > order to to gain improved compilation times vs using smaller amounts of
> > RAM.
>
> Is about code granulation able to make use of the multicores.
If you would actually write sentences that contained subjects and verbs
you might actually learn how to communicate with others. You may be
trying to communicate something meaningful here but you have failed to
do so.
> You looks
> like an idiot not knowing his ass what he is talking about.
I will be plonking you after I finish commenting on your puerile post.
> Then "out there" means you go out down town and buy something like that,
> not crap on Amazon and such. I bet I did run code on super computers at a
> time you were not even born.
I see. So if it's not in stock in some "down town" store it does not
exist?
As for your "betting you did run code on super computers at time when I
was not even born", since one cannnot now and has never been able to "go
out down town and buy" a supercomputer, by your logic they are not "out
there" and thus you by your own logic could not possibly have used one.
> Please leave this thread, you do not contribute in any way.
<plonk>
== 2 of 6 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 20 2014 1:39 pm
From: "J. Clarke"
In article <lbk1ld$8sl$2@speranza.aioe.org>, bobhaa@djea.org says...
>
> J. Clarke wrote:
>
> > What it's good for is avoiding reinventing the wheel. If you have a
> > tested library already available that provides the function that you
> > need with acceptable performance, why rewrite it?
>
> I don't know, but going through reverse engineering other peoples craps is
> more time demanding than going through own crap. Don't you know it, where
> have you been?
Why would you want to reverse engineer a stock library? Are you trying
to pirate it or something?
> You seems to be a new beginner in computing, having a big mouth.
Yep, <plonk> was the right decision.
== 3 of 6 ==
Date: Tues, Jan 21 2014 1:26 am
From: Juha Nieminen
Herman Viracocha <hermv@idioqm.org> wrote:
> Juha Nieminen wrote:
>
>> Nick Baumbach <nich@iwqoc.org> wrote:
>>> I mean, it has to make things easier, but it does not looks like, since
>>> it takes hours to compile.
>>
>> It does not make things easier because it takes hours to compile?
>
> No? Definitely is not easier. Are you sure you clearly understand "hours
> to compile"?
I'm sure that something like g++ takes quite a long time to compile.
However, that doesn't make it less useful.
--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---
== 4 of 6 ==
Date: Tues, Jan 21 2014 2:52 am
From: Öö Tiib
On Monday, 20 January 2014 23:37:32 UTC+2, J. Clarke wrote:
>
> In article <lbk1c9$8sl$1@speranza.aioe.org>, bobhaa@djea.org says...
No. Such person does not exist so he can say nothing. So far it is just
Random Male Name <random letters@random letters.org>
See examples like Herman Viracocha, Bob Hammermann or Nick Baumbach.
> <plonk>
Good luck filling your killfile with random troll-generated names and addresses
and announcing it every time.
== 5 of 6 ==
Date: Tues, Jan 21 2014 5:39 am
From: Martijn Lievaart
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 20:41:17 +0000, Bob Hammerman wrote:
> J. Clarke wrote:
>
>> What it's good for is avoiding reinventing the wheel. If you have a
>> tested library already available that provides the function that you
>> need with acceptable performance, why rewrite it?
>
> I don't know, but going through reverse engineering other peoples craps
> is more time demanding than going through own crap. Don't you know it,
> where have you been?
Having just debugged a professional well respected open source library, I
can say:
- It's crap
- Debugging it took 1 day, writing this functionality would probably have
taken months, if not a year.
So your statement is not true.
M4
== 6 of 6 ==
Date: Tues, Jan 21 2014 6:59 am
From: Robert Wessel
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 17:08:48 GMT, scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal)
wrote:
>Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> writes:
>>On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 15:26:52 GMT, scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal)
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Nick Baumbach <nich@iwqoc.org> writes:
>>>>Ian Collins oratorically vehemently insists
>>>>
>>>>> On a more up to date machine with gcc:
>>>>>
>>>>> time ./b2 -j 32
>>>>>
>>>>> <stuff>
>>>>>
>>>>> The Boost C++ Libraries were successfully built!
>>>>>
>>>>> real 1m2.319s user 27m57.961s sys 1m49.214s
>>>>
>>>>Wow, -j 32 !! Say no more. Where did you find that 32 since at most I only
>>>>can find 16, as 2 threads per core. Actually thread core, not real core.
>>>>An i7 is still a 4 core, not sure how that threaded core is embedded into
>>>>the hardware.
>>>>
>>>>Please elaborate
>>>
>>>Many larger systems are available. Not too many years ago, I was running
>>>-j384 compiles regularly on a 192-core shared memory system.
>>
>>
>>Although arraigning to build over a cluster would almost certainly be
>>far cheaper. OTOH, I've never looked at the internals of the Boost
>>build system, so I have no idea how hard it would be to get it to do
>>that.
>
>The aforementioned 192-core shared ccNUMA memory system (1TB DRAM) was selling
>for about USD100,000 in 2009. About the same as a simliarly sized cluster
>(16 nodes).
>
>The followon system, which was in design, had 1024 xeon cores instead
>of 192 opteron cores; but the economy stepped in and aborted that plan.
Although a cluster of smaller machines with the same number of cores
would almost certatinly have been a fair bit cheaper. Assuming we're
talking something like PCs where the prices of the low end systems are
substantially less per-MIPS than the big SMPs.
Still, there's no reason not use use all 192 cores for a build if you
have enough RAM and I/O, assuming you have the box already. But if
your application is big builds, a cluster is almost certainly going to
be considerably cheaper since (big) builds are mostly EP.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: The Beauties of Islam
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c++/t/b79532a504d8f51e?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 15 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 20 2014 2:56 pm
From: woodbrian77@gmail.com
The C++ Middleware Writer is based on Judeo/Christian roots.
I'm not aware of C++ work based on Islamic roots.
Brian
Ebenezer Enterprises - In G-d we trust.
http://webEbenezer.net
== 2 of 15 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 20 2014 4:48 pm
From: Mr Flibble
On 20/01/2014 22:56, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote:
>
> The C++ Middleware Writer is based on Judeo/Christian roots.
> I'm not aware of C++ work based on Islamic roots.
>
> Brian
> Ebenezer Enterprises - In G-d we trust.
What a load of bollocks mate.
/Flibble
== 3 of 15 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 20 2014 4:49 pm
From: Mr Flibble
On 21/01/2014 00:48, Mr Flibble wrote:
> On 20/01/2014 22:56, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> The C++ Middleware Writer is based on Judeo/Christian roots.
>> I'm not aware of C++ work based on Islamic roots.
>>
>> Brian
>> Ebenezer Enterprises - In G-d we trust.
>
> What a load of bollocks mate.
Specifically Judaism is no less fucktarded than any other religion.
/Flibble
== 4 of 15 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 20 2014 5:37 pm
From: woodbrian77@gmail.com
On Monday, January 20, 2014 6:49:58 PM UTC-6, Mr Flibble wrote:
Please don't swear here.
Brian
Ebenezer Enterprises - The fool has said in his heart,
"There is no G-d." Psalms 14:1
== 5 of 15 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 20 2014 5:55 pm
From: woodbrian77@gmail.com
On Monday, January 20, 2014 7:37:50 PM UTC-6, woodb...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, January 20, 2014 6:49:58 PM UTC-6, Mr Flibble wrote:
>
> Please don't swear here.
>
http://www.desiringGod.org/interviews/can-christians-cuss-to-prove-a-point#full-audio
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mFaRD3OPHE
== 6 of 15 ==
Date: Tues, Jan 21 2014 1:27 am
From: Juha Nieminen
woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote:
> The C++ Middleware Writer is based on Judeo/Christian roots.
> I'm not aware of C++ work based on Islamic roots.
I think there's something wrong in your brain. Maybe you should have
it checked.
--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---
== 7 of 15 ==
Date: Tues, Jan 21 2014 2:23 am
From: "Qu0ll"
wrote in message
news:c2f415a8-d26c-412e-b137-fdacfa93951c@googlegroups.com...
> The C++ Middleware Writer is based on Judeo/Christian roots.
> I'm not aware of C++ work based on Islamic roots.
Brian, we both may identify ourselves as Christians but my response to that
is definitely a big WTF???
--
And loving it,
-Qu0ll (Rare, not extinct)
_________________________________________________
Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com
[Replace the "SixFour" with numbers to email me]
== 8 of 15 ==
Date: Tues, Jan 21 2014 4:37 am
From: Victor Bazarov
On 1/21/2014 4:27 AM, Juha Nieminen wrote:
> woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote:
>> The C++ Middleware Writer is based on Judeo/Christian roots.
>> I'm not aware of C++ work based on Islamic roots.
>
> I think there's something wrong in your brain. Maybe you should have
> it checked.
Please don't feed trolls.
== 9 of 15 ==
Date: Tues, Jan 21 2014 11:13 am
From: Bo Persson
Qu0ll skrev 2014-01-21 11:23:
> wrote in message
> news:c2f415a8-d26c-412e-b137-fdacfa93951c@googlegroups.com...
>
>> The C++ Middleware Writer is based on Judeo/Christian roots.
>> I'm not aware of C++ work based on Islamic roots.
>
> Brian, we both may identify ourselves as Christians but my response to
> that is definitely a big WTF???
>
So Brian admits to being ignorant on islamic software, whatever that is.
Who cares?
== 10 of 15 ==
Date: Tues, Jan 21 2014 2:51 pm
From: woodbrian77@gmail.com
On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 3:27:43 AM UTC-6, Juha Nieminen wrote:
> woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > The C++ Middleware Writer is based on Judeo/Christian roots.
> > I'm not aware of C++ work based on Islamic roots.
>
> I think there's something wrong in your brain.
>
Consider these verses from Psalms 121:
"I will lift up my eyes to the mountains;
From where shall my help come?
My help comes from the L-rd,
Who made heaven and earth.
He will not allow your foot to slip;
He who keeps you will not slumber.
Behold, He who keeps Israel
Will neither slumber nor sleep."
G-d is the original server. He's 100% ready.
I turn to G-d and the Bible for inspiration
and understanding when it comes to providing
quality services. I also ask around here for
ideas. G-d has people all over the world.
Maybe we can agree that C++ is an excellent language
for writing services.
Brian
Ebenezer Enterprises - Ask, and it will be given
to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will
be opened to you.
http://webEbenezer.net
== 11 of 15 ==
Date: Tues, Jan 21 2014 3:20 pm
From: woodbrian77@gmail.com
On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 4:51:00 PM UTC-6, woodb...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Consider these verses from Psalms 121:
>
> "I will lift up my eyes to the mountains;
> From where shall my help come?
> My help comes from the L-rd,
> Who made heaven and earth.
> He will not allow your foot to slip;
>
This is another answer to when Leigh asked me about
the possibility of me being hit by a bus. I replied
with the story about Elijah and Elisha, but here we
have supernatural protection so my foot doesn't slip.
And remember how Elijah was treated. He wasn't hit
by a bus, but was whisked away in a flaming chariot.
== 12 of 15 ==
Date: Wed, Jan 22 2014 3:53 am
From: David Brown
On 22/01/14 00:20, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 4:51:00 PM UTC-6, woodb...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Consider these verses from Psalms 121:
>>
>> "I will lift up my eyes to the mountains;
>> From where shall my help come?
>> My help comes from the L-rd,
>> Who made heaven and earth.
>> He will not allow your foot to slip;
>>
>
> This is another answer to when Leigh asked me about
> the possibility of me being hit by a bus. I replied
> with the story about Elijah and Elisha, but here we
> have supernatural protection so my foot doesn't slip.
>
> And remember how Elijah was treated. He wasn't hit
> by a bus, but was whisked away in a flaming chariot.
>
Are you really claiming that people should trust your code because it is
"inspired by God", and we can trust your company because you have
supernatural powers and will not die, but be "whisked away", and
presumably continue to provide customer service and support from heaven?
I don't really care what you believe in or not - faith is a personal
matter (except when it affects how you treat other people, of course).
If your faith inspires you to work hard and have confidence in the job
you do, then that's great. But the sort of twaddle you posted here has
no place in a business or profession. A piece of software has no faith,
and a company has no religion - you really have to learn to separate
these from yourself. If you can't do that, switch professions - you'll
make far more money as a TV evangelist.
== 13 of 15 ==
Date: Wed, Jan 22 2014 9:32 am
From: woodbrian77@gmail.com
On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 5:53:24 AM UTC-6, David Brown wrote:
> Are you really claiming that people should trust your code because it is
No. The generated code is available to be read by anyone.
The same is true of a lot of the hand written code.
> "inspired by God", and we can trust your company because you have
> supernatural powers and will not die, but be "whisked away", and
I didn't claim that I won't die. Elijah trained Elisha
to do his job and then Elijah was carried away.
>
>
>
> I don't really care what you believe in or not - faith is a personal
Remember "In G-d we trust".
> and a company has no religion
Ebenezer Enterprises does. Would you agree that the US
has Judeo/Christian roots? I'm thinking of the pilgrims
who sailed across the Atlantic and also thinking of modern
day pilgrims like Sean Hannity
http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/sean-hannity-andrew-cuomo-i-cant-wait-leave-new-york
== 14 of 15 ==
Date: Wed, Jan 22 2014 11:24 am
From: David Brown
On 22/01/14 18:32, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 5:53:24 AM UTC-6, David Brown wrote:
>
>> Are you really claiming that people should trust your code because it is
>
> No. The generated code is available to be read by anyone.
> The same is true of a lot of the hand written code.
>
Making all your source code available to others is good for trust, of
course.
>> "inspired by God", and we can trust your company because you have
>> supernatural powers and will not die, but be "whisked away", and
>
> I didn't claim that I won't die. Elijah trained Elisha
> to do his job and then Elijah was carried away.
>
So you - on the basis of your beliefs in the OT - you are confident of
training a replacement before getting "whisked away" ?
If you are a one-man company, that's fair enough - as long as you are
clear about this to customers, and have appropriate measures in place
(available documentation, source code, license details, etc.) so that
they know how they can continue with their own work if you get hit by a
bus. But when you tell customers that they don't need to worry because
you've got God on your side, and you are the next Elijah, then any sane
customer will laugh at you.
>>
>>
>>
>> I don't really care what you believe in or not - faith is a personal
>
> Remember "In G-d we trust".
If /you/ want to trust in God, that's fair enough - just don't expect
any customers to trust in /your/ trust.
>
>
>> and a company has no religion
>
> Ebenezer Enterprises does.
A company has no religion. It is not a person, it does not have
beliefs. Your problem is that you fail to understand what a company
/is/, and mix it up with yourself.
A company has a /profile/, and that profile can have ethical or moral
standards (as long as they are legal and non-discriminatory) - but that
is not the same as claiming it has a religion.
> Would you agree that the US
> has Judeo/Christian roots?
A lot of the /people/ who formed the modern USA have Christian roots -
though many do not. The "founding fathers" attempted to make a country
where people could be free to follow whatever religion they wanted,
which was a noble aim and certainly /not/ a Christian idea. If
anything, their inspiration was the Roman Empire with its tradition of
tolerance for many peoples and religions.
> I'm thinking of the pilgrims
> who sailed across the Atlantic and also thinking of modern
> day pilgrims like Sean Hannity
>
> http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/sean-hannity-andrew-cuomo-i-cant-wait-leave-new-york
>
It is well-known that the pilgrim fathers left England because of
"religious persecution" - what is less well-known is that it was the
sect left England because /they/ were not allowed to persecute others.
There was far too much religious freedom (i.e., several different
variants of Christianity were allowed) in England for their tastes, and
they wanted to go somewhere where everyone could be forced to follow
/their/ ideas.
== 15 of 15 ==
Date: Wed, Jan 22 2014 3:14 pm
From: woodbrian77@gmail.com
On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 1:24:41 PM UTC-6, David Brown wrote:
>
> So you - on the basis of your beliefs in the OT - you are confident of
> training a replacement before getting "whisked away" ?
>
I'm not saying I'll be whisked away. Just that Elijah
was whisked away.
> If you are a one-man company, that's fair enough - as long as you are
> clear about this to customers, and have appropriate measures in place
> (available documentation,
It would be nice to have some documentation discussions
here. I acknowledge there's room for improvement on
the documentation and welcome specific ideas on how to
improve it. I've been focusing a lot on the software,
and the docs need work.
> source code, license details, etc.) so that
> they know how they can continue with their own work if you get hit by a
> bus. But when you tell customers that they don't need to worry because
> you've got God on your side, and you are the next Elijah, then any sane
> customer will laugh at you.
>
Ample evidence of the quality is available in terms
of both the generated code and hand written code.
There's also this page
http://webEbenezer.net/comparison.html
.
I'm not the next Elijah. I'm learning from his example.
Habakkuk 2:4
"Behold the proud, his soul is not upright in him; but the
just shall live by his faith."
I can give some help to people to make a decision about
using the C++ Middleware Writer, but as with any other
decision there's some risk involved. For those who are
living by faith in G-d it might be an easier decision
to make than for those aren't.
It doesn't hurt that the company has been here since 1999.
Maybe some will admit that making it to 2014 in better
shape than ever is evidence that G-d has helped us.
>
> > Remember "In G-d we trust".
>
> If /you/ want to trust in God, that's fair enough - just don't expect
> any customers to trust in /your/ trust.
In G-d we trust is the national motto of the United States.
We're upfront about our faith in G-d. We let other people
know the source of our strength.
>
>
> A company has no religion. It is not a person, it does not have
> beliefs. Your problem is that you fail to understand what a company
> /is/, and mix it up with yourself.
>
You fail to acknowledge our rights are from G-d.
Remember our name is Ebenezer - that means "So far G-d
has helped us."
Would you expect anything but the best of work
(interesting, rewarding, etc.) for those who follow G-d?
>
> It is well-known that the pilgrim fathers left England because of
> "religious persecution" - what is less well-known is that it was the
> sect left England because /they/ were not allowed to persecute others.
Your understanding is incorrect. They left in order
to follow G-d according to their conscience. I had
to do the same thing when I started a company. I left
behind those companies with immoral policies. If I
were an employee of IBM, Microsoft, Apple, etc. today,
some of the money I helped them make would be going to
support immoral lifestyles. I said, "Thanks, but no
thanks" to that. If you want to lead a G-dly life, it
will cost you some in terms of income. Unfortunately
what is considered "good" by some is evil from G-d's
perspective.
"Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil;
Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness;
Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!"
Isaiah 5:20
I see this as a King David against Goliath struggle.
G-d blessed David with the victory over the foul-mouthed
Goliath.
Brian
Ebenezer Enterprises
http://webEbenezer.net
http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/sean-hannity-andrew-cuomo-i-cant-wait-leave-new-york
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Link object files from VC++ and GCC?
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c++/t/d605f2ea0db15eb9?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 23 2014 9:39 am
From: "Rick C. Hodgin"
Is there a way to link object files between Visual C++ and GCC?
I have some data that I need to encode like this:
char* list[] = {
"one",
"two",
"three",
};
Unfortunately, by default, the list[0], list[1], and list[2] pointers point
to data that's in read-only memory. Any attempt to do something like
memcpy(list[0], "eno", 3) fails with "Access Violation" on Windows.
So, I discovered this syntax in GCC which creates the elements in read-write
memory, allowing memcpy(list[0], "eno", 3) to work properly:
char* list[] = {
(char []) { "one" },
(char []) { "two" },
(char []) { "three" },
};
I need the data pointed to by those list elements to be read-write in my
application. I can use this compound literal syntax in GCC to create
them in read-write memory, and it works in GCC. However, Visual C++
does not support this compound literal syntax and generates about 5
errors per line when I attempt it. :-)
I was wondering if there's a way to link in that one file, which will
contain nothing more than a list like this sample, but with about 100
separate elements in it representing a source code file I need to
modify somewhat at use (replacing placeholders like "[9999]" with the
actual runtime observed values, such as "[ 1]" and so on), to my
Visual C++ generated code in Visual Studio 2008?
I'm looking for something like this:
gcc -c my_list.c
cl /c my_prog.cpp
link my_list.o my_prog.obj my_prog.exe
Thank you in advance.
Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin
== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 23 2014 9:40 am
From: "Rick C. Hodgin"
In the alternative, does anyone know of a version of a Windows-based C/C++
compiler that will honor the compound literal syntax, which will link in
with the correct object format?
Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin
==============================================================================
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "comp.lang.c++"
group.
To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c++?hl=en
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c++/subscribe?hl=en
To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com
==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment