Sunday, December 29, 2019

Digest for comp.programming.threads@googlegroups.com - 3 updates in 2 topics

downey123jacksan@gmail.com: Dec 28 08:48PM -0800

aminer68@gmail.com: Dec 28 08:45AM -0800

On Saturday, December 28, 2019 at 6:49:29 AM UTC-5, Bonita Montero wrote:
> > I think TSO is better, it is just around 3% ~ 6% less performance
 
> It's impossible to estimate that since you can't build a ARM-CPU
> with TSO for comparison.
 
 
 
Read again, it says:
 
"ARM's weak memory model could provide good performance.
But TSO could provide simpler programming model with 3% ~ 6% performance penalties."
 
Read more here to notice it:
 
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/201695/files/CS471_proj_slides_Tao_Marc_2011_1222_1.pdf
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>: Dec 28 07:14PM +0100

> Read again, it says:
> "ARM's weak memory model could provide good performance.
> But TSO could provide simpler programming model with 3% ~ 6% performance penalties."
 
It's impossible to prove that.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

No comments: