- "Will Carbon Replace C++?" by Manuel Rubio - 1 Update
- Is this safe? - 2 Updates
| Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com>: Mar 01 04:53PM -0600 On 3/1/2023 3:30 PM, Scott Lurndal wrote: > I'd suggest that the existance of gcc and clang haven't relegated > C and C++ to "hobbyist languages". They have relegated a whole bunch > of commercial toolchains to niche or oblivion. Dude, have you commercially worked with any computer software in the last ten years ? Commercially means that you got paid by somebody for your work. Lynn |
| "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>: Mar 01 02:29PM -0800 On 2/28/2023 5:42 AM, Malcolm McLean wrote: > For example my code is ultimately released as a drawing package for artists. > It's not acceptable to log an error, because that would generate calls to > customer support which we wouldn't be able to handle effectively. What type of error? A bad file name, or a seg fault? |
| Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>: Mar 01 02:40PM -0800 Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> writes: [...] > But C "functions" can perform actions. Specifying correct actions is a whole > different ball game to specifying functions, which are just mappings from > one set to another. No, this is where *you* get trapped by not accepting that terms can have different meanings in different fields. C++ functions are not mathematical functions. They're subroutines that may or may not return values, that may or may not have side effects, and so on. And the concept is defined clearly and unambiguously by the standard. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com Working, but not speaking, for XCOM Labs void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */ |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment