- xchg based thing... - 2 Updates
- The ultimate thread pool - 6 Updates
| "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>: Feb 01 01:16PM -0800 On 11/26/2023 10:14 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > mind yet. > I will port my Relacy test units over to standard C++. It's not all that > hard. In fact, it's rather straightforward. [...] Humm... Might be able to use it to quickly generate very complex models. Reduce the loading screen time... This one is fairly complex and I can get 60fps... https://i.ibb.co/CBJqT8h/image.png |
| "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>: Feb 01 01:17PM -0800 On 2/1/2024 1:16 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > Reduce the loading screen time... This one is fairly complex and I can > get 60fps... > https://i.ibb.co/CBJqT8h/image.png https://i.ibb.co/02MskNt/image.png |
| "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>: Jan 31 06:35PM -0800 On 1/31/2024 12:32 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>> https://clang.llvm.org/docs/MSVCCompatibility.html >> Nothing of what I said. > I think it is relevant. Also, what's up with all of those pragmas anyway? Humm: https://youtu.be/hAMQIvEtcJM |
| "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>: Jan 31 07:10PM -0800 On 1/31/2024 6:35 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >> I think it is relevant. Also, what's up with all of those pragmas anyway? > Humm: > https://youtu.be/hAMQIvEtcJM Your pragmas also make me think of: https://youtu.be/i_6zPIWQaUI |
| Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>: Feb 01 11:18AM +0100 Am 31.01.2024 um 21:32 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson: > I think it is relevant. Also, what's up with all of those pragmas anyway? They suppress warnings and the type of warning is in the commment. |
| "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>: Feb 01 12:05PM -0800 On 2/1/2024 2:18 AM, Bonita Montero wrote: > Am 31.01.2024 um 21:32 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson: >> I think it is relevant. Also, what's up with all of those pragmas anyway? > They suppress warnings and the type of warning is in the commment. Oh, I know all about that. But why in the world would anybody want to suppress warnings that deal with: _________________ #pragma warning(disable: 26110) // Caller failing to hold lock 'lock' before calling function 'func'. #pragma warning(disable: 26111) // Caller failing to release lock 'lock' before calling function 'func'. #pragma warning(disable: 26115) // Failing to release lock 'lock' in function 'func'. #pragma warning(disable: 26117) // Releasing unheld lock 'lock' in function 'func'. #pragma warning(disable: 26800) // Use of a moved from object: 'object'. _________________ Wow! ;^o |
| red floyd <no.spam.here@its.invalid>: Feb 01 12:23PM -0800 On 2/1/2024 12:05 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > 'object'. > _________________ > Wow! ;^o [SARCASM] Because Bonita's code is perfect and you're a doofus, duh! [/SARCASM] |
| "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>: Feb 01 12:30PM -0800 On 2/1/2024 12:23 PM, red floyd wrote: > [SARCASM] > Because Bonita's code is perfect and you're a doofus, duh! > [/SARCASM] YIKES! lol. Thanks for the laugh! :^D These warnings are, ummm, well, _very_ important. I still don't know why the Bonita suppresses them. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment