- About software quality and programming - 1 Update
- Is the group dead? - 2 Updates
| Ramine <ramine@1.1>: Feb 23 03:45PM -0800 Hello, I was thinking more, and i have noticed that you haven't agreed with me that my parallel varfiler can be called an invention... and that other of my programming projects are inventions too, but anyway my inventions have to be judged on the critera of "quality" i think, and speaking about software "quality", i have to define what's the "criterions" that allow us to judge software quality, we have the following criterons that permit us to judge software quality: - Reliability - Efficiency - Security - Maintainability - Identifying critical programming errors - and portability - expressivness But i have to be frank with you, what i have found difficult is when only one individual must fulfill the goal alone of attaining a high level degree of software quality , i mean when you are implementing a programming project alone , you have to take into account all the above criteria alone, and to fullfil the most important goal of programming that is a high degree of "quality" alone... but when you are working in a team , the manager of the team has to divide the work efficiently between members of the team so that each one have not to take into account all the above criteria alone, but has to fullfil this goal only for some of the above criterions, so that programming becomes much easier and efficient, this is what i have tried to achieve alone by implementing my parallel varfiler, so the question is then: does my parallel varfiler fulfill this goal of a high degree of software quality ? i think that my parallel varfiler is good, cause on the criterion of reliability it is good, cause it is stable and it is even fault tolerant to power failures, and to "disk full" errors etc. and on the criterion of efficiency it is good also, because it is fast and efficient, and on the criterion of maintainability, it is good also, because it is easy to maintain, and on the criteria of expressivness it is good also, cause my parallel varfiler is a parallel hashtable that works from the memory and it can also work from memory and from the hardisk, and you can easily save manually the parallel hashtable to a hardisk's file, or you can configure parallel varfiler to save "automaticly" your keys and corresponding datas to a hardisk's file at realtime, i mean when you call update() or delete() or add()... it can do it at realtime on memory and on the hardisk's file, and my parallel varfiler is a parallel hashtable that uses lock striping so it is good... and on the portability criterion my parallel varfiler is portable to other operating systems such us windows, linux and MacOSX on x86 systems. This is why i have told you that you will not find this concept that i have designed and called parallel varfiler on C++ and C# or Java, if you are not convinced , can you show me were my parallel varfiler has been implemented on C++ or C# or Java ? so this is why i have told you that my parallel varfiler is a good candidate to be called an invention, and i think that my other projects such us my parallel conjugate gradient linear system solver library that is cache-aware and scalable on NUMA architecture, and my other projects and inventions too , are good also... You can download my projects from here: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/ Thank you for your time. Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| WuEm <w.maleska@gmail.com>: Feb 23 10:34AM -0800 Somehow, I can't see any new threads except for Ramine's rants. Is it just me? |
| Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com>: Feb 23 08:40PM +0100 On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 10:34:32 -0800 (PST) > Somehow, I can't see any new threads except for Ramine's rants. > Is it just me? Group is dead... |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment