Thursday, May 19, 2016

Digest for comp.lang.c++@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 8 topics

Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid>: May 19 10:13AM

>> it's just not physically feasible.
 
> What about the ships the Pilgrims used to escape from
> Europe?
 
Not even nearly the same size.
 
Try to google up the largest wooden ship ever made. There just is a
physical limit to how large a wooden ship can be.
 
>> treatment because of your own religion and your own biases, and
>> you are incapable of seeing it in a more level-headed context.
 
> I'm following in the footsteps of people like William Bragg
 
No. You believe the myth because you want to believe the myth.
You are highly biased and refuse to even accept the idea that the
myth is just that, a story. A fable. Mythology. Made up.
 
The world is stock full of similar myths, both ancient and modern.
There are, in fact, many myths that are significantly more belivable
and physically possible than the ark one. Yet you don't accept any
of them, and see them for what they are. Except for this one.
 
--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---
Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>: May 19 09:31AM -0400

On 5/19/2016 6:13 AM, Juha Nieminen wrote:
> and physically possible than the ark one. Yet you don't accept any
> of them, and see them for what they are. Except for this one.
 
> --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---
 
OTOH, you think it's a myth because you don't want to believe the story
can be real. And yes, there are many stories floating around, both
ancient and modern. And some of them have even been discovered to be
based on truth.
 
Your mind is just as closed as his is.
 
 
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: May 19 05:46PM +0100

On 19/05/2016 14:31, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
 
> Your mind is just as closed as his is.
 
Don't be a twit. Noah's Ark is in the Book Of Genesis and we know
Genesis is fictional because we know, among other things, that evolution
is a fact. If anyone has a closed mind it is you mate. Try opening
YOUR mind to SCIENTIFIC TRUTH.
 
/Flibble
woodbrian77@gmail.com: May 19 11:55AM -0700

On Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 8:31:17 AM UTC-5, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> can be real. And yes, there are many stories floating around, both
> ancient and modern. And some of them have even been discovered to be
> based on truth.
 
I wouldn't use the word "discovered" there. The following
quotes are from this page:
 
http://truemyths.org/2015/02/12/tolkien-c-s-lewis-and-true-myths/
 
" A young C.S. Lewis was no different. In fact, he once told Tolkien that myths were lies, though "lies breathed through silver." Tolkien took issue with this, so much so that he wrote a poetic response to Lewis' assertion and started a long dialogue with him that resulted in Lewis' eventual conversion."
 
"Coming back to Lewis, Tolkien's poetic response to him ("Mythopoeia") was about much more than the truth of Christianity. In fact, it's not really
about Christianity at all, at least not explicitly, but instead argues
that mankind is by his nature a little maker, and furthermore that the inspirations he receives to make are not just random sputterings of his
brain but are instead "monitions," movements from an external and
supernatural source. In this sense, our inspirations are not ultimately meaningless, but promptings to fulfill our nature as subcreators."
 
I hope that sounds familiar. That's basically what I've been saying
for years. I claim the C++ Middleware Writer is G-d's gift to me
to save me. G-d used the ark to save Noah and I have a similar
tale to tell.
 
 
Brian
Ebenezer Enterprises - So far G-d has helped us.
http://webEbenezer.net
Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>: May 19 03:37PM -0400

On 5/19/2016 12:46 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
> is a fact. If anyone has a closed mind it is you mate. Try opening
> YOUR mind to SCIENTIFIC TRUTH.
 
> /Flibble
 
You claim that the Book of Genesis is fictional without any proof - and
then have the nerve to claim I have a closed mind? ROFLMAO!
 
You obviously haven't read Genesis. That's for sure. But that's
typical of closed-minded idiots.
 
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>: May 19 11:43PM +0200

On 19/05/16 21:37, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
 
>> /Flibble
 
> You claim that the Book of Genesis is fictional without any proof - and
> then have the nerve to claim I have a closed mind? ROFLMAO!
 
It is not up to anyone to prove that a particular book is fictional -
the book is fictional until proved to be fact (or at the very least,
until there is some independent corroborating evidence for at least some
of the stories in the book).
 
The claims in the Book of Genesis are extraordinary, to say the least.
And extraordinary claims need extraordinary proof. For Genesis, there
is - to my knowledge - no independent proof in any written documents or
archaeology. I don't think there is even any evidence for significant
Israelite presence in ancient Egypt, as slaves or otherwise.
 
Of course, a complete lack of any evidence does not prove that Genesis
is fictional - merely that if you want to believe it to be "true" in any
sense, then you do so on faith and not due to rational thought or reasoning.
 
And no, Mr. Flibble, the fact that evolution is a solid scientific
theory with as strong a basis in evidence as the theory of gravity does
not actually "prove that Genesis is fictional". It gives a far more
sensible explanation for the origins of humanity, but you cannot /prove/
that God does not exist or that Bible literalists are wrong. They can
always appeal to "God made it look that way", and your argument is void.
So it is a reasonable rational assumption that Genesis is fictional -
but it is not /proven/ to be. However, the onus is on believers to
provide evidence that the book is non-fiction.
 
 
> You obviously haven't read Genesis. That's for sure. But that's
> typical of closed-minded idiots.
 
It is good to keep an open mind - but not so open that your brains
dribble out.
Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: May 19 06:42PM +0100

...should advocate the forming of an international body for protecting
the rights of sausages.
 
And now, the funniest joke in the world:
 
https://soundcloud.com/johnnydaukes/the-funniest-joke-in-the-world
 
/Flibble
Ramine <ramine@1.1>: May 19 01:05PM -0700

Hello,
 
Dir Sir, so from my previous explanation, if i want
to affirm that fir is an idiot, i have to come with
some evident proof, this is what will make me not an idiot,
it is rational thinking that will make me not an idiot,
but contrary, Mr. Hitler has made of himself an idiot,
because it has made an affirmation that jews are
really bad without giving some more evident scientific
proof, and why this has happened? because the character of
Hitler was too harsh and too violent and this has
prevented him to use more rational thinking, so this
has made him an idiot who was followed by other Nazi idiots,
this is not the only deviation from rational thinking that
has made Hitler because of his too harsh and too violent character,
there is more evidence that Hitler was an idiot, and i will
not get into more details now.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane
Prroffessorr Fir Kenobi <profesor.fir@gmail.com>: May 19 10:39AM -0700

W dniu czwartek, 19 maja 2016 19:03:45 UTC+2 użytkownik Ramine napisał:
> not get into more details now.
 
> Thank you,
> Amine Moulay Ramdane
 
IMo youre an idiot trying to argue with himself that you are not an idiot - and you fail
We could have some compassion for you seeing how dameged you are but it is hard becouse you are visible idiot trashing and destroing our space (you can be idiot but you shouldnt destroy the forums, i dont know if in hell debils (morons) are treated in more light way (probably yes) but still you should be aware what harm you make)
Ramine <ramine@1.1>: May 19 01:17PM -0700

Hello,
 
Dir Sir, IQ is not the only variable that you have to evaluate to be
able to affirm if yes or no that you are an idiot, because character is
also a second variable that you have to evaluate , so if your character
is let say too harsh , it can prevent rational thinking, so if it can
prevent rational thinking , so we can say that a too harsh
character can make you an idiot.
 
So from my explanation i can affirm that Hitler was an idiot, because
his character was too harsh and too violent, so it has prevented him
from rational thinking, so it has made him an idiot. So Hitler
was an idiot that was followed by Nazi idiots.
 
Dir Sir, so from my previous explanation, if i want
to affirm that Donald Trump is an idiot, i have to come with
some evident proof, this is what will make me not an idiot,
it is rational thinking that will make me not an idiot,
but contrary, Mr. Hitler has made of himself an idiot,
because it has made an affirmation that jews are
really bad without giving some more evident scientific
proof, and why this has happened? because the character of
Hitler was too harsh and too violent and this has
prevented him to use more rational thinking, so this
has made him an idiot who was followed by other Nazi idiots,
this is not the only deviation from rational thinking that
has made Hitler because of his too harsh and too violent character,
there is more evidence that Hitler was an idiot, and i will
not get into more details now.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane
Ramine <ramine@1.1>: May 19 01:32PM -0700

Sorry , this was posted in the wrong group.
Ramine <ramine@1.1>: May 19 01:35PM -0700

Hello,
 
 
I wanted to post this on soc.culture.israel and soc.culture.usa,
but i have posted it in the wrong group.
 
Sorry.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
bleachbot <bleachbot@httrack.com>: May 19 06:24PM +0200

bleachbot <bleachbot@httrack.com>: May 19 06:34PM +0200

bleachbot <bleachbot@httrack.com>: May 19 06:35PM +0200

bleachbot <bleachbot@httrack.com>: May 19 06:42PM +0200

bleachbot <bleachbot@httrack.com>: May 19 07:03PM +0200

bleachbot <bleachbot@httrack.com>: May 19 07:15PM +0200

bleachbot <bleachbot@httrack.com>: May 19 07:30PM +0200

bleachbot <bleachbot@httrack.com>: May 19 07:33PM +0200

Ramine <ramine@1.1>: May 19 12:35PM -0700

On 5/15/2016 9:54 AM, Prroffessorr Fir Kenobi wrote:
> W dniu niedziela, 15 maja 2016 18:43:40 UTC+2 użytkownik Jerry
Stuckle napisał:
>> Ramine. At least he tries to use proper grammar and spelling!
 
>> Just one more proof that you're an idiot.
 
> you all infanile brain-disfunctional crap-makers think so (in reality
im slightly over the average and that is a problem, im so cursed)
 
Dir Sir, IQ is not the only variable that you have to evaluate to be
able to affirm if yes or no that you are an idiot, because character is
also a second variable that you have to evaluate , so if your character
is let say too harsh , it can prevent rational thinking, so if it can
prevent rational thinking , so we can say that a too harsh
character can make you an idiot.
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Prroffessorr Fir Kenobi <profesor.fir@gmail.com>: May 19 10:31AM -0700

W dniu czwartek, 19 maja 2016 18:34:35 UTC+2 użytkownik Ramine napisał:
> is let say too harsh , it can prevent rational thinking, so if it can
> prevent rational thinking , so we can say that a too harsh
> character can make you an idiot.
 
I dont say dork that you are idiot becouse of your IQ - youre idiot becouse youre harmfull brickass wrecking damage and you do not understand very basic simple things that others do understood, (like trashing this space), (so simply fuck you brickass),
Here again you are showing that youre preposterous idiot (medical level probably) as you still dont understand this space is not to flow a spam of idiot on hitler or
your even huindreds of announcements on your silly c++ crap what else but for discussion,
get off
Ramine <ramine@1.1>: May 19 12:43PM -0700

Hello,
 
 
I have wrote this:
 
"Dir Sir, IQ is not the only variable that you have to evaluate to be
able to affirm if yes or no that you are an idiot, because character is
also a second variable that you have to evaluate , so if your character
is let say too harsh , it can prevent rational thinking, so if it can
prevent rational thinking , so we can say that a too harsh
character can make you an idiot."
 
 
So from my explanation i can affirm that Hitler was an idiot, because
his character was too harsh and too violent, so it has prevented him
from rational thinking, so it has made him an idiot. So Hitler
was an idiot that was followed by Nazi idiots.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Ramine <ramine@1.1>: May 19 12:26PM -0700

On 5/15/2016 9:54 AM, Prroffessorr Fir Kenobi wrote:
>> Ramine. At least he tries to use proper grammar and spelling!
 
>> Just one more proof that you're an idiot.
 
> you all infanile brain-disfunctional crap-makers think so (in reality im slightly over the average and that is a problem, im so cursed)
 
Dir Sir, QI is not the only variable that you have to evaluate to be
able to affirm if yes or no that you are an idiot, because character is
also a second variable that you have to evaluate , so if your character
is let say too harsh , it can prevent rational thinking, so if it can
prevent rational thinking , so we can say that a too harsh
character can make you an idiot.
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Ramine <ramine@1.1>: May 19 12:36PM -0700

On 5/15/2016 9:54 AM, Prroffessorr Fir Kenobi wrote:
>> Ramine. At least he tries to use proper grammar and spelling!
 
>> Just one more proof that you're an idiot.
 
> you all infanile brain-disfunctional crap-makers think so (in reality im slightly over the average and that is a problem, im so cursed)
 
Dir Sir, IQ is not the only variable that you have to evaluate to be
able to affirm if yes or no that you are an idiot, because character is
also a second variable that you have to evaluate , so if your character
is let say too harsh , it can prevent rational thinking, so if it can
prevent rational thinking , so we can say that a too harsh
character can make you an idiot.
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)