- So stay tuned ! - 2 Updates
| Ramine <toto@toto.net>: Mar 19 02:56PM -0400 Hello...... You don't understand, i was aware that memory ordering is not the only issue and that you have to use fences and memory barriers but what i am explaining to you is that my implementation of my algorithms like my MLock and AMLock etc. already uses the correct fences and memory barriers to ensure sequential consistency in the hardware side, but what i need is to switch the optimization off to avoid memory ordering of the Delphi and FreePascal compilers. That's easy to do, i have thought that Delphi and FreePascal doesn't reorder loads and stores, but this was a mistake, but this mistake is easy to correct, but mistakes in software programming can happen, but i am confident that as soon as i correct this mistake, you will be happy with my C++ Libraries. So stay tuned ! Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdne. |
| Ramine <toto@toto.net>: Mar 19 03:03PM -0400 On 3/19/2017 2:56 PM, Ramine wrote: > barriers to ensure sequential consistency in the hardware side, but what > i need is to switch the optimization off to avoid memory ordering of the > Delphi and FreePascal compilers. I will switch the optimization off just locally on my MLock and AMLock and some others, that's easy to do to avoid memory reordering of Delphi and FreePascal.. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment