Tuesday, May 30, 2017

Digest for comp.programming.threads@googlegroups.com - 6 updates in 6 topics

rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 29 06:37PM -0400

Hello..............
 
Here is my proof about Islamism from the Koran:
 
"And had your Lord willed, those on earth would have believed - all of
them entirely. Then, [O Muhammad], would you compel the people in order
that they become believers?
And it is not for a soul to believe except by permission of Allah, and
He will place defilement upon those who will not use reason."
Koran [10:99-100]
 
So from that, forced conversion is not allowed by Koran, and since many
of arab countries were ruled by national socialism, so many many people
inside those arab countries were not muslims, we can not define them
muslims, so we can not call those arab countries muslims countries as is
calling them Islamism of Al-Qaida or Islamism of ISIS, and since arab
countries has been in contact with science and theory of Darwin, so many
many people inside those arab countries, if not the majority of the
people of those arab countries are not muslims, we can not define them
as muslims, so ISIS and Al-Qaida are not allowed by Koran and Islam to
rule those arab countries by Dictatorship of Islam, and more than that
if they rule those arab countries with Islamism they will cause a
contradiction with Koran [10:99-100] above, because Islamism is a
dictatorship that can like force people and especially the children
to convert to Islam by different mechanisms like propaganda of Islamism,
and this is not allowed by Koran [10:99-100], because the following law
of Allah in the Koran says:
 
"And had your Lord willed, those on earth would have believed - all of
them entirely. Then, [O Muhammad], would you compel the people in order
that they become believers?
And it is not for a soul to believe except by permission of Allah, and
He will place defilement upon those who will not use reason."
Koran [10:99-100].
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 29 03:26PM -0400

Hello...........
 
 
Artificial Intelligence(AI) Today and Trends
 
Look at this video:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NoIzNZ_2rGE
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 29 03:04PM -0400

Hello...............
 
 
A more correct schema..
 
Hope you have read my previous post to understand better
my thoughts..
 
Now i will ask you a question..
 
How to be more confident ?
 
To be more confident you have to be more professionalism..
 
And more professionalism is constrained by rationality and logic..
 
So an important step is to define professionalism..
 
Professionalism can not be defined with the old conception..
 
Because professionalism of today is optimization that knows better how
to survive..
 
We have to reject the old conception of Hitler and of the old communism
because it was less optimization that lacks optimization of today..
 
You have to abstract the political philosophy..
 
Foe example when i say:
 
Justice must constrain happiness
 
and responsability must constrain justice
 
that's not sufficient..
 
Because responsability is influenced by the variable of "tolerance"
and "tolerance" can become an heuristic that optimizes the system,
so if we are more "tolerance" we can attract consumers and higher
the consumer confidence index and we can penetrate more the economic
market of others, this is inferred from empirical moral
and this is the preferred way of social Liberalism that wants
to play this card.. and this inform us that morality is not just
saying that Justice must constrain happiness and responsability must
constrain justice, because that lacks empirical moral.. and you have
to know how to decompose morality to be able to understand morality,
morality is also the guidance of moral, so morality must be guided by
the soft way of enforcing the quality of morality, like i have explained
it in my previous post, and by enforcing the hard way the laws of
morality.. and morality is also a priori pure moral inferred from
reason,and morality is also empirical moral, such as saying that
"tolerance" over responsability and over justice can become an heuristic
that optimizes and better the economic system and the social system,
or like saying that "tolerance" over immigration can become
an heuristic that optimizes and better the economic system and
the social system.
 
Please reread my thoughts to understand more:
 
What is the factors that create quality ?
 
There is among them correctness and reliablity and also efficiency..
 
So you have to understand what is correctness and reliability and
efficiency of the system or the political philosophy..
 
Efficiency is not saying since jews make more money, so jews are bad.
 
Efficiency and reliability and correctness of the system must be
abstracted like when we are abstracting the software with UML and IDAR..
 
And your abstraction must shows the essentials..
 
So when you are doing political philosophy that's the same..
 
You have to decompose correctly and abstract correctly and be efficient
in your thinking..
 
Like when i say: How to provoke and bring quality to the political
system and the system ?
 
If you are blind you will say that it is futility..
 
But when you are smart you will say that it is an important question
that must be answered..
 
How do you think we can bring quality to morality ?
 
Remember with me the soft way and the hard way to bring quality to
morality that i have discussed previously..
 
Without this perception and conception you will be like a blind person..
 
Blindness is not good for quality.
 
So please read my following thoughts to be able to see what i am
seing..
 
I am a white arab...
 
I am a computer programmer and i have a diploma in Microelectronics and
informatics..
 
What is the most important goal of my political philosophy?
 
In my opinion the most important aim of my political philosophy is that
as I have just explained that the idea in the Platonic sense has a very
important characteristic, it is that one can perfect it and bring it to
be more and more perfect or even perfect, then in my opinion the aim of
my political philosophy it is to perfect ideas and to make them follow
by the people, not only that, but these architectural and efficient and
correct ideas of my political philosophy should be regarded as automata
that should be executed to arrive at there efficient goals, now a
question arises from it: how to encourage the people to execute these
architectural ideas as executing automata to perfect more our world ?
One of the ways to do this is what I have done in my political
philosophy is to show that rationality and science and microprocessors
and valuable advices etc. etc. are also as time machines that permit to
travel in the future , that is the architectural ideas of my political
philosophy and this architectural ideas of my political philosophy leads
the people to perceive the world differently by giving for example more
importance and high priority to science and efficient technics and
technology, the other method is also to reinforce more these
architectural ideas of my politicial philosophy to be able to enhance
and perfect, as we are enforcing laws..
 
Please reread i have corrected more my typos to understand more my
political philosophy:
 
Can we travel back in time?
 
Here is my thoughts that i have just wrote:
 
It is a very interesting question that demands rationality
and logical thinking to answer it ...
 
To answer it, i start from a mathematical subject which is the
mathematical arithmetic series.
 
An arithmetic series has as its main characteristic that
the difference between its terms is constant ... and that its sum
gives (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), a_n being the last term ... now you have
to be smart and notice with me that just before the final step of the
final calculation that resulted as a general equation of the arithmetic
series, the calculation of the arithmetic series required of us a much
bigger time to solve the series .. But as soon as the result (a_n * (a_n
+ 1)) / 2 has been reached, the time for the resolution of the
arithmetic series has greatly diminished, therefore the time preceding
the resolution has compressed a lot and allowed us to travel in the the
future quickly, the resolution of the arithmetic series which gave: (a_n
* (a_n + 1)) / 2), it's like a wormhole in the universe permit us to
time travel in the future more quickly, but understand with me that the
time travel in the future that allows you to make the equation of (a_n *
(a_n + 1)) / 2) is relative to the time taken previously by the
arithmetic series just before the discovery of the equation (a_n * (a_n
+ 1)) / 2), and thus that the universe is computable and that ultimately
it allowed a time travel and thanks to mathematics that is something
extra-ordinary in itself.
 
Now I will be more logical and ask myself the following question:
 
Is there any contradiction in my evidence since a car
is not a machine to allow time travel in the future to
the simple reason that the regions where we will travel and arrive
faster with a car will not have aged in time that corresponds to the
future time in which one arrives by the feet?
 
I answer this in a more logical way:
 
Notice that when I said that the mathematical equation
of the arithmetic series (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2) is a time travel machine
that permits to travel in the future, because it is an equation that
also predicts the result more quickly to which one arrives by paper
without this equation, so the time has no hold on the theoretical result
that is predicted faster so that there is no contradiction when it comes
to theoretical prediction. Also when you use this invention That is this
mathematical equation of the arithmetic series: (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2),
it is that you are living the future of the one who has not yet
invented or used this equation and who will arrive there in its future,
therefore it is for this reason that this equation is also a time travel
machine that permits to travel in the future and it has a predictive
characteristic.
 
So there is no contradiction and therefore we can
consider a car as a time traveling machine to travel in the future, like
the microprocessor, and like several other mathematical inventions
as the mathematical equation of the arithmetic series.
 
Here is one of my conclusion:
 
If you are traveling from Montreal to Paris
by airplane, and that another person swims and walk
by foot to Paris, and assume that the person who moves by swiming
and walking wants to see Paris and answer some questions,
And if you travel to Paris by plane and you
answer these questions more quickly since you are going to see Paris
more quickly than the person swimming and and walking , so that
has a predictive character as the mathematical equation of the
arithmetic series (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), since you will be able
to send an email quickly to the person who wants to
to swim and walk to Paris and give him
the answers he's looking for, so you'll be able to see
the answers of his future, and this predictive characteristic
can be considered as a time travel machine that permits to travel in the
future,
so the aircraft and the car are like time travel machines that permit to
travel in the future ... as well as the processors and other
mathematical inventions and others...
 
 
Rationality and logic also have a predictive characteristic,
so you must also reason better in a more scientific manner and take into
account the scientific and empirical evidence to
be ahead of others, like a time machine that permits to travel in the
future..
 
If a first person receives a valuable advice and this advice
of value allows him to better control his future and to succeed in his
life in the future by executing this valuable advice and also it allows
him to predict his future, and besides, imagine that a second person
will receive in its future this valuable advice, then the first person
will be able to guess with CERTITUDE the future of the second person
which will be the consequence of the execution of this valuable advice ,
and not only the first person will have lived the future of the second
person before the second person, since the two will have lived the same
event by the execution of this valuable advice, then in my opinion we
must reason as in fuzzy logic rather than in boolean logic and
notice that since the first person will guess with CERTITUDE
The future of the second person and will also live the future event of
the second person, then those two theoretical and
empirical evidences confirms that the first person has lived the future
event of the second person, so this valuable advice could be called by
mathematical approximation a time machine that permits to travel in the
future, I say "approximation", because we by analogy are as in fuzzy
logic rather than in boolean logic, in addition to that, that the fact
that the first person guesses with CERTITUDE the future of the second
person, this informs in a logical manner that this certainty change our
way of perceiving, for this certainty, even if
it is not travel in the future, it is by approximation
as a journey into the future, for a journey into the future
will lead to the same certainty, and as a result
the same certainties permit us to affirm by approximation
that the valuable advice is a time machine that permits us to travel
in the future.
 
Then you understand that I am also a Platonist,
Because you noticed that I can define this time travel in the future as
a platonic event, so when i said that a valuable advice is a time
machine that permits to travel in the future, you understand that it
makes us live platonically the future of others, and since I am a also
Platonist, I affirm that a valuable advice is a time travel machine
that permits us to travel in the future of others since time has no hold
on the ideas, and that the same idea through time inside two
persons, is the same idea, therefore my proof is made that the valuable
advice is a time machine that permits us to travel in the future.
 
When you imagine a circle, I asserts that not only can you imagine the
circle in material or matter but also in immaterial, as was my proof
that I have just given you , this immaterial essence of the idea is
reified by our reason, and that is the reason that gives it existence.
So this in my opinion is sufficient proof that the idea exists because
we feel it by our reason and it pays homage to our beloved philosopher
Plato.
 
It is this reification of the immaterial essence of the idea
by reason which gives the necessary and even sufficient approximation to
call even a valuable advice a time machine that permits to travel in the
future.
 
Then since the idea exists and since a sensation also exists,
then one can not also distinguish an idea from the generated sensation
by the execution as an automaton of a valuable advice at a time t1 and a
time t1 + t2, and since an idea does not age then we can affirm that
valuable advice is a time machine that permits us to travel in the
future, and the valuable advice has a predictive characteristic, because
the approximation is sufficient since we are not in boolean logic but in
fuzzy logic.
 
 
Getting more technical that's also mean getting more efficient with
rationality and logic, because i am a rational type of person..
 
You have to understand the game of politics..
 
The game of politics is not saying that jews are getting rich so jews
are bad, this is the neo-nazism way of thinking..
 
But this thinking is inferior..
 
Because when you think about morality, you have
to decompose morality into the guidance of morality and
the a priori pure moral and empirical moral..
 
I have defined the guidance of morality as being the goal of philosophy
that is happiness that guides also morality, this guidance
is inherent to our essence.
 
And a priori pure moral is inferred from reason
 
and empirical moral is inferred from empirical world.
 
So morality is not too much ideal justice as in communism using
the tool of the violence of Class Struggle because of compassion that
wants to reduce too much social Darwinism, this causes extremism and
violence, or morality is not too extreme definition of what is white
europeans civilization, as in neo-nazism, and that lacks the
optimization with the heuristic of "tolerance" towards immigration that
optimizes the economic system and the social system , this is an
inferior thinking.
 
You can make more money with more money, but allowing making more money
is also a mechanism like an heuristic that provoke and bring more
quality, this is also inferred from empirical moral, it's like the
heuristic of "tolerance" that optimizes the system, we allow also to
make more money to not being laziness and to be more productive and to
be more efficient and to be more creativity and to be more inventivity..
so this heuristic is the base of capitalism also, this is why we can not
say that capitalism is bad, but capitalism and the system is also
constrained by other mechanisms like the mechanism of not neglecting
compassion and respect and love to not cause violence and extremism in
the system,
now the interpretation of how much compassion and respect and love
will not be leaved to the reader, because the degree of compassion and
love and respect needed in the system must be interpreted as avoiding
extremism that can causes hate and violence and desorder, so the degree
of compassion and love and respect must be approximated by a political
party such as social democracy or social Liberalism that knows how
to be decent compassion and decent respect and decent love, the other
important mechanism is "democracy" and the power of the people
, this power of the people can provoke and bring quality but
it's also constrained
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 29 11:40AM -0400

Hello.......
 
 
Here is my last and corrected text about: Getting more technical in
politics...
 
Getting more technical that's also mean getting more efficient with
rationality and logic, because i am a rational type of person..
 
You have to understand the game of politics..
 
The game of politics is not saying that jews are getting rich so jews
are bad, this is the neo-nazism way of thinking..
 
But this thinking is inferior..
 
Because when you think about morality, you have
to decompose morality into the guidance of morality and
the a priori pure moral and empirical moral..
 
I have defined the guidance of morality as being the goal of philosophy
that is happiness that guides also morality, this guidance
is inherent to our essence.
 
And a priori pure moral is inferred from reason
 
and empirical moral is inferred from empirical world.
 
So morality is not too much ideal justice as in communism using
the tool of the violence of Class Struggle because of compassion that
wants to reduce too much social Darwinism, this causes extremism and
violence, or morality is not too extreme definition of what is white
europeans civilization, as in neo-nazism, and that lacks the
optimization with the heuristic of "tolerance" towards immigration that
optimizes the economic system and the social system , this is an
inferior thinking.
 
You can make more money with more money, but allowing making more money
is also a mechanism like an heuristic that provoke and bring more
quality, this is also inferred from empirical moral, it's like the
heuristic of "tolerance" that optimizes the system, we allow also to
make more money to not being laziness and to be more productive and to
be more efficient and to be more creativity and to be more inventivity..
so this heuristic is the base of capitalism also, this is why we can not
say that capitalism is bad, but capitalism and the system is also
constrained by other mechanisms like the mechanism of not neglecting
compassion and respect and love to not cause violence and extremism in
the system,
now the interpretation of how much compassion and respect and love
will not be leaved to the reader, because the degree of compassion and
love and respect needed in the system must be interpreted as avoiding
extremism that can causes hate and violence and desorder, so the degree
of compassion and love and respect must be approximated by a political
party such as social democracy or social Liberalism that knows how
to be decent compassion and decent respect and decent love, the other
important mechanism is "democracy" and the power of the people
, this power of the people can provoke and bring quality but
it's also constrained by the mechanism and the counter-power of the
financial and banks institutions that have there rating methodology that
take into account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions,
and this creates also a world stability because we have to optimize our
economic systems and by being responsable by being also responsable
governance and responsable democracy, the other mechanism is
also the consumer confidence index that is a power that provoke
and bring quality to the system, because we have to know how to be
respect and compassion and love to higher consumer confidence
index locally and internationally, the other mechanism about morality
is the soft way and the hard way to provoke and bring quality to
morality, You have to know how to provoke and bring quality to morality
of the system, there is the soft way and the hard way.. all is not laws,
you have to know how to provoke and bring quality using the soft way,
like i was doing in my previous post called:
 
"What is the most important goal of my political philosophy?"
 
and you have to know how to design and implement laws by being more
efficient at inferring them from the guidance of moral and a priori
pure moral and empirical moral more, this is the essence of efficiency,
you have to be capable and smarter in doing it, that's a necessary
requirement to survive better and that fact is the soft way
that provoke and bring more quality and the hard way is to know
how to enforce the necessary laws, so be smart, because
it's the essence of rationality and logic.
 
Also there is the mechanism and heuristic of "tolerance" over
immigration that provoke and bring more quality, as i have
said that Nationalism of Donald Trump lack the heuristic of flexibility
using tolerance that get you more optimized, but social Liberalism of
democrates uses the flexibility of tolerance to optimize the economic
system and the social system, nationalism is like extreme justice of
communism that lack tolerance and that can hurt economic system and the
social system.
 
Because I have said about morality that:
 
Justice has to constrain happiness..
 
And responsability has to constrain justice..
 
But responsability is influenced by the variable of tolerance ,
so if we are more tolerance on responsability we can higher the consumer
confidence in you and we can attract more consumers and we can penetrate
more the market of others, this is the game of social Liberalism.
 
Social Liberalism of democrates wants also to play the card of tolerance
to attract consumers and to higher consumer confidence index and to be
able to penetrate more the market of others and to optimize better the
social system, nationalism doesn't undertand it well.
 
And i have explained also to you about the heuristic of "tolerance" that:
 
Capitalism also wants to optimize, and capitalism says for example
that even arabs are not as beautiful as white europeans, it says that
arabs are tolerable, because capitalism wants to optimize economy
and the society by bringing arabs immigrants that are also decent
people, because today we are constrained by many factors, and
optimization has been rendered by those constrains to as the following:
 
If you are useful for something like jobs and economy or/and useful to
low birth rate of white europeans or/and you are useful to higher the
consumer confidence index and/or and you are useful to better the world
order and security , you can be welcome to USA or other countries..
 
About America and the world..
 
Before, operating systems like OS/2 of IBM were a monolithic OSs ,
but as the time has gone by we have developed more sophisticated
OSs like Mach 3 or Windows NT, those sophisticated OSs were more
decentralized and were designed in a such a way to be more efficient
and managed better, the difference between a monolithic one and not
monolithic one is like programming with message passing or Object
oriented programming, and we have also the tendency to decentralize the
management of our societies to be more efficient, it's the same
for capitalism , capitalism tries to optimize better by not
being as monolithic as the old way of thinking of Hitler, so
today because of constrains on optimization, usefulness is interpreted
not as being as beautiful as white europeans or being as civilized as
white europeans to better optimize the system economically.. it's
like decentralizing to better optimize, now to not get extremist,
you have to know how to tune correctly optimization to better optimize
and to not cause problems to societies.
 
Also you have to know how to apply the division of labour and how to
apply Adam Smith's specialization Theory to be more optimized..
 
And the other mechanism that brings quality to the system is the following:
 
About the crispations of extremist nationalism..
 
The old way of thinking like nazism and communism was full of violence..
 
So we have to enhance ourselves to avoid those problems..
 
The world has changed, and we are not at the time of Hitler in 1930,
the crispations of extremist nationalism was also due to a need
of being more domination in the secondary sector of economy, but
this model is becoming more archaic, please read why:
 
"The economic models developed by the development economists of the
1960s, based on the idea of industrializing industries, seem to be
losing more and more of their unconditional supporters. The economic
development of a country or a region is no longer Dependent on the
development of the secondary sector or heavy industry. "
by M'Fadel El Halaissi, of which our readers are familiar, is Deputy
Chief Executive Officer of BMCE Bank.
 
Please read more here(you have to translate it from french to english,
because it is in french), it's from the Economist Magazine in Morocco
my country:
 
http://www.leconomiste.com/article/915791-la-conqu-te-conomique-de-l-afrique-passe-par-le-secteur-des-servicespar-m-fadel-el-ha
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 29 11:38AM -0400

Hello...........
 
 
Here is my preferred song of Michael Jackson
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yURRmWtbTbo&feature=youtu.be
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 29 11:24AM -0400

Hello........
 
 
A beautiful song that i want to share with you..
 
Wonderful Life - Black
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNNTKZ4hEyw
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)