Monday, November 26, 2018

Digest for comp.programming.threads@googlegroups.com - 5 updates in 5 topics

Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Nov 25 04:19PM -0800

Hello..
 
Read this:
 
I will do more political philosophy, please read all my following
thoughts to understand better my thoughts:
 
I think "Flexibility" is also something really important in politics and
management, because nationalism and communism come with some
deficiencies because they lack flexibility, for example communism
still uses Class Struggle that is too violent and that can bring
war and destruction to our humanity, and neo-nazism also uses
Racial Struggle that is too violent that can bring war and destruction
to humanity, and nationalism also use National Struggle against the
others , but the problem of nationalism is that nationalism of today
lacks flexibility too because it is too much nationalism that is not in
accordance with a correct pragmatism or correct realism, nationalism of
today is by analogy as if you are too individualistic, i mean that
nationalism of today is not correct "efficiency", because also
nationalism of today, like the one that resulted from populism, comes
from "fear" of Globalization without
being correct pragmatism and correct efficiency, and i think that's also
lacking of flexibility, because we have to know
more about Globalization, i mean that you have to know how to transcend
your living conditions by being more educated and more skilled and more
efficient and more aware ! this is why i am here to bring my own
thoughts, and this is why i am speaking about how we have today to
get more efficient by working with others globally , not just locally
inside a country, and this is why i said that neo-nazism and white
supremacism lack flexibility too that is needed by efficiency(read below
my writing about neo-nazism and immigration to notice it), now what
about Globalization? read what's follow about Globalization and you will
understand more:
 
About globalization..
 
About populism..
 
I think that populism of USA that has also elected Donald Trump,
and other populism around the world, are like Class "Struggle"
of communism, because this populism is fearing insecurity
of globalization , insecurity that has been created because
this populism of USA have not been able to adapt correctly to
globalization because this populism has to be more skilled and
more educated to be more "competitive" so that to be "successful", also
here is the the solution to populism of USA:
 
First, USA has to adapt and improve quickly in education and health
care, read the following to understand more:
 
The United States ranks 27th in the world for its investments in
education and health care as measurements of its commitment to economic
growth, according to the first-ever scientific study ranking countries
for their levels of human capital.
 
The nation placed just behind Australia (ranked 26th) and just ahead of
Czech Republic (ranked 28th). In contrast, China's ranking of 44th in
2016 represents an increase from its 1990 ranking of 69th.
 
"The decline of human capital in the United States was one of the
biggest surprises in our study," said Dr. Christopher Murray, director
of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the
University of Washington. "Our findings show the association between
investments in education and health and improved human capital and GDP
-- which policymakers here in the US ignore at their own peril. As the
world economy grows increasingly dependent on digital technology, from
agriculture to manufacturing to the service industry, human capital
grows increasingly important for stimulating local and national economies."
 
The World Bank President, Dr. Jim Yong Kim, defines human capital as
"the sum total of a population's health, skills, knowledge, experience,
and habits." It is a concept that recognizes that not all labor is
equal, and the quality of workers can be improved by investing in them.
 
The US's ranking of 27th in 2016 represents a significant decrease from
its 1990 ranking of 6th. It comes from having 23 years of expected human
capital, measured as the number of years a person can be expected to
work in the years of peak productivity, taking into account life
expectancy, functional health, years of schooling, and learning.
 
Researchers found that nations with greater improvements in human
capital also tend to have faster growth in per capita GDP. Countries in
the highest quartile of improvements in human capital between 1990 and
2016 had a 1.1% higher median yearly GDP growth rate than countries in
the bottom quartile of human capital improvements. For example, between
2015 and 2016, a 1.1% increase in the human capital growth rate in China
equated to an additional $163 per capita; in Turkey, $268 per capita;
and in Brazil, $177 per capita.
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/09/180924190303.htm
 
Second, populism of USA has to be more aware about the advantages of
globalization, so read the following:
 
And about globalization..
 
1- Globalization has created new opportunities for firms to develop
business models and offerings that have a higher intensity of R&D,
innovation and capital. Many of the goods and services that have entered
the market over the past decades have exactly those features, and
without globalization, firms would have been forced to continue with
business models that work with a smaller volume of sales. Firms have
been able to specialize more than before and, as a consequence, human
capital and the share of skilled jobs in the economy have grown
remarkably. Today, advanced economies have a greater share of
better-paid and better-skilled jobs than ever before.
 
2- Globalization has increased real wages for people in Western
economies by making products cheaper or reducing the pace of price
increases. If the typical goods that every household purchases had
followed domestic rather than international price developments,
consumers would have been poorer and saddled with products of lower quality.
 
3- Globalization has made significant contributions to productivity
growth and, as a consequence, further raised living standards.
Globalization has been particularly important for enabling new
technology to spread fast across markets. In the long term, it is the
speed of technological improvement that sets the pace for how richer
societies get.how societies get richer
 
However, trade and investment are not growing fast anymore, and there is
much suggesting that the decline in trade and investment growth is one
explanation to the failing dynamism of Western economies. While some
appreciate the decline in the growth of globalization, those who care
about the prosperity of a society should deplore it and make efforts for
the world economy to return to high levels of trade growth.
 
Read the following study to know more about globalization:
 
The Economic Benefits of Globalization for Business and Consumers
 
http://ecipe.org/publications/the-economic-benefits-of-globalization-for-business-and-consumers/
 
Read the following study to know more about globalization:
 
The Economic Benefits of Globalization for Business and Consumers
 
http://ecipe.org/publications/the-economic-benefits-of-globalization-for-business-and-consumers/
 
 
And read my following thoughts about morality and democracy and God:
 
More about God..
 
You have to be able to do political philosophy to understand God of the
monotheistic religions, God is capable of making it "perfect", and
making it perfect is for example being absolute happiness that is the
goal of morality that is perfection at best, so why God has not created
us of this perfection ? then why are we suffering ? this suffering of
our body and spirit is also "imperfections" that are in contradiction
with the essence of God. So i think we have not to believe in God.
 
 
So now are we lost without God ?
 
I am more mature and i believe that we have to be more optimistic,
because i was looking at morality and i have noticed that it is getting
much more efficient, because we are getting more aware and more
efficient today , thus we have not to make the mistake and get into
hating and hating our world ! because it is easy to hate this or that !
this is why we have to be more mature and be more responsability. and
notice that we are getting much more efficient today with technology and
science ! and we are getting more organized and more sophisticated ! so
you have to be able to love this beautifulness of this much more
efficiency of today ! giving it a high priority and a big importance is
i think the key to success ! so today we have to be more smart and
understand that we also have to work together globally and we have to be
more organized and more order globally ! thus since as i said that
morality is perfection at best , this shows that it is also about
efficiency ! so we have to be more efficient thinking and more efficient
actions ! and you have to understand more correctly what is the at best
of perfection at best that is morality, so read what's follow to be able
to understand:
 
And here is again my previous writing about democracy and morality:
 
I will now do more political philosophy about democracy and about morality..
 
As you have noticed i have talked about the essence of morality,
and i have proved that morality is Perfection at best by saying the
following:
 
===
 
I said in my proof before of: morality is perfection at best, the following:
 
"Because morality exists because we have to avoid the bad
And we have to avoid the bad by also trying to maximize at best the good
And trying to maximize at best the good is also called: perfection at best
So morality is pushed towards absolute perfection
So that to be able to solve all our problems
And be absolute happiness that is the goal
But morality of today must at least be a decent morality
To avoid desorder and violence inside the system"
 
I have to be more precise:
 
When i say: And we have to avoid the bad by also trying to maximize at
best the good
 
What is it that we call "good" in morality ?
 
A good is like we have to correct or eliminate a defect or flaw , and
being morality is correcting and eliminating the defects or flaws so
that to attain reliability or flawlessness (you have not to read it out
of context of my above proof), because in morality we have to maximize
at best the good and minimizing at best the bad, that means also that we
have to maximize at best reliability so that to attain flawlessness ,
and this is called perfection at best since from the following
definition: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection
perfection is also called freedom from fault or defect that we call:
FLAWLESSNESS
 
Also i said above that:
 
"But morality of today must at least be a decent morality
To avoid desorder and violence inside the system"
 
Now can we ask the following question:
 
How can we measure decent morality ?
 
We can first ask the following question:
 
How do we measure the truth ?
 
The truth is measured by our our senses and by our smartness and by
rationalism and by empiricism !
 
So i think we can feel the relativeness of truth, i mean that the truth
is measured by a reference of measure , but there can be many references
of measure that gives different results of truth ! and thus we have to
"prioritize" to be able to succeed ! i give you an example:
when i said (read below) that decent morality has to be measured by the
reference of measure that is perfection at best so that the government
enforce more correctly "order", this government needs to prioritize
wich of the reference of measures of the truth are more "valid" !
so there is the reference of measure that is happiness or absolute
happiness , but since law enforcement of "order" that is of a "highest"
priority, so the "truth" of: is it decent morality or not ? must be
measured by the reference of measure that is perfection at best in
itself so that to say that it is decent morality or not ! so here again
you are noticing the relativeness of the truth since the reference of
measure is choosen among many and is prioritized !
 
I will explain more by giving an example:
 
To be able to say that morality that is perfection at best and that
is guided by civilization that avoids at best savagery is a decent
morality, you have to give weights or a order of priorities to
things or processes , you can for example say that "order" is of highest
importance and perfection at best is of highest importance and you can
say that richness is of a highest importance and you can infer that even
if we are somewhat suffering to finally become rich and to be finally
order and to be finally perfection at best, we can say that this process
is decent morality because it gives results that are of highest
importance for us.
 
Also i think that the tendency of today is that morality that is
Perfection at best is balancing perfection with our kind of
"civilization" so that to not being savagery or desorder.
 
====
 
 
 
I think that you understand more the essence of morality, but
there is still something to say, i said that morality is
perfection at best, so now we have to ask the following question:
how to avoid "extremism" of perfection that can be dangerous ? i mean
that perfection at best can for example give too much
importance to "efficiency" and this can become dangerous ! so
is my definition of morality that is perfection at best correct
or not ? i think that there is no logical contradiction in
my definition and it is correct because you have to understand
the essence of democracy that is related to morality to understand
better ! because we have to look at our "essence" to understand better
morality ! because since a great part of the people of the society are
more human and they do understand that getting into savagery is "bad" !
so this great part of people of the society does constrain democracy !
since for example the legislative branch or power of the government has
to know how to be "moderation" to avoid extremism that hurt the system
or that causes violence or/and desorder and/or that causes civil war
inside the system ! so this makes us understand that morality that is
perfection at best is constrained by democracy so that the "at best"
becomes more human or more moderation that is in accordance of our today
kind of civilization that, as you have noticed, is balancing perfection
with our kind of civilization so that to avoid savagery or desorder. So
i hope you have understood my explanation and definition of what is the
essence of morality, so i think that we have to be more optimistic about
morality.
 
And here is what i wrote about democracy:
 
I think the success of USA has to be that USA has to understand the
way USA is governed, take for example the separation of powers,
What is the separation of powers?
 
The U.S. Constitution set up three separate but equal branches of
government: the legislative branch, or Congress, makes the law; the
executive, led by the president, executes the law; and the judicial, or
courts, interprets the law.
 
But we have to be smarter than that, the separation of powers is not
"sufficient", so we have to be smarter and know that the legislative
branch has to understand how to make the legislative branch successful !
look for example at USA , its congress is constituted with both
conservatives and democrats, but this legislative branch has to
understand a very important requirement that the legislative branch has
to know how to be "moderation" to not cause violence or civil war
inside the system ! this is the key to success ! thus the legislative
branch of USA has to avoid "extremism" that causes
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Nov 25 03:20PM -0800

Hello...
 
Read this:
 
 
Why do Indians outperform Chinese in the US jobs market? Better people
skills could have a lot to do with it
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/2158211/why-do-indians-outperform-chinese-us-jobs-market-better-people
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Nov 25 12:54PM -0800

Hello..
 
 
My Parallel C++ Conjugate Gradient Linear System Solver Library that
scales very well was updated to version 1.74
 
Here is what i have enhanced:
 
The Solve() method is now thread-safe, so you can you call it from
multiple threads, everything else is thread-safe except for the
constructor , you have to call the constructor one time from a process
and use the object from multiple threads.
 
I think that my library is much more stable and fast and it works
on both Windows and Linux.
 
You can read about it and download it from my website here:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-parallel-c-conjugate-gradient-linear-system-solver-library
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Nov 25 11:34AM -0800

Hello,
 
Read again, i correct a typo:
 
 
My following software projects were updated:
 
Parallel implementation of Conjugate Gradient Linear Sparse System
Solver library that scales very well was updated to version 1.74
 
And
 
Parallel implementation of Conjugate Gradient Dense Linear System Solver
library that is NUMA-aware and cache-aware that scales very well was
updated to version 1.74
 
Here is what i have enhanced:
 
The Solve() method is now thread-safe, so you can you call it from
multiple threads, everything else is thread-safe except for the
constructor , you have to call the constructor one time from a process
and use the object from multiple threads.
 
 
You can download them from:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-parallel-implementation-of-conjugate-gradient-sparse-linear-system-solver
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-parallel-implementation-of-conjugate-gradient-dense-linear-system-solver-library-that-is-numa-aware-and-cache-aware
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Nov 25 11:25AM -0800

Hello...
 
 
My following software projects were updated:
 
Parallel implementation of Conjugate Gradient Linear Sparse System
Solver library that scales very well was updated to version 1.74
 
And
 
Parallel implementation of Conjugate Gradient Dense Linear System Solver
library that is NUMA-aware and cache-aware that scales very well was
updated to version 1.74
 
Here is what i have enhanced:
 
The Solve() method is now thread-safe, so you can you call it from
mutiple threads, everything else is thread-safe except for the
constructor , you have to call the constructor one time from a process
and use the object from mutiple threads.
 
 
You can download them from:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-parallel-implementation-of-conjugate-gradient-sparse-linear-system-solver
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-parallel-implementation-of-conjugate-gradient-dense-linear-system-solver-library-that-is-numa-aware-and-cache-aware
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)