- "Doing UTF-8 in Windows" by Mircea Neacsu - 1 Update
- I think that some of you here are "not" thinking correctly - 1 Update
- Here is my new inventions that are my new variants of Scalable RWLocks that are powerful.. - 4 Updates
- I have posted just a few posts here, don't worry this is my last post in this newsgroup of C++ - 1 Update
- two's complement idea - 2 Updates
| Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com>: Feb 22 03:22PM -0800 On Friday, February 21, 2020 at 6:35:15 AM UTC-3, Alf P. Steinbach wrote: > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/globalizing/use-utf8-code-page#set-a-process-code-page-to-utf-8> > This is fast becoming off-topic for clc++. > However, I first learned about this feature here; I don't recall who. In case someone wants to print utf8 chars on windows console UINT oldcp = GetConsoleOutputCP(); SetConsoleOutputCP(CP_UTF8); printf(u8"maçã"); SetConsoleOutputCP(oldcp); |
| aminer68@gmail.com: Feb 22 03:12PM -0800 Hello, I think that some of you here are "not" thinking correctly, because you have to read my last post, because i am posting just very a few posts and after that i am stoping them, this is not a spam, because it must be analysed in the context of what is happening to usenet, usenet is dying , so posting just very few posts like i am posting here, it is not spam here. But as i said: I have posted just very few posts here, don't worry this is my last post in this newsgroup of C++ Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>: Feb 22 10:14AM +0100 >> off-topic posts >> here. > He is manic and his impulses are stronger than his inhibitions. He just wrote in comp.programming.threads that he considers himself as a genois. That's megalomania. Mania and megalomania is a common combination and this shows that my assessment to consider him as bipolar is correct. |
| Real Troll <Real.Troll@Trolls.com>: Feb 22 05:45PM -0400 On 15/02/2020 18:30, Öö Tiib wrote: > Please do not post about your Pascal code here, it is not topical. > In world there are programs that are written in Pascal but we are > not participating in any of those projects. You can send a complaint to his ISP: abuse@videotron.ca Send a copy of the full headers when you complain so that they can investigate and block his GoogleGroups access. |
| Wisdom90 <d@d.d>: Feb 22 05:35PM -0500 On 2/22/2020 4:45 PM, Real Troll wrote: > abuse@videotron.ca > Send a copy of the full headers when you complain so that they can > investigate and block his GoogleGroups access. I think you are an american, so here is my answer, look at one of the failures of USA: What next for Israeli-Palestinian peace talks? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVru7xFOm0A Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| aminer68@gmail.com: Feb 22 02:36PM -0800 On Saturday, February 22, 2020 at 4:43:28 PM UTC-5, Real Troll wrote: > abuse@videotron.ca > Send a copy of the full headers when you complain so that they can > investigate and block his GoogleGroups access. I think you are an american, so here is my answer, look at one of the failures of USA: What next for Israeli-Palestinian peace talks? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVru7xFOm0A Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| aminer68@gmail.com: Feb 22 02:02PM -0800 Hello, I have posted just a few posts here, don't worry this is my last post in this newsgroup of C++ Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org>: Feb 21 07:35PM -0500 On 2/16/20 3:17 AM, Alf P. Steinbach wrote: > Fix: `~(size_t(-1)/2u)`. But the question is, since code is about > communicating to humans, does this communicate the right thing? > - Alf You still have the issue that if size_t is smaller than int (and unsigned) the ~ operator will set more bits then the upper bit of size_t maybe size_t(~(size_t(-1)/2u))) but the +1 version I think is cleaner. |
| "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com>: Feb 22 07:01AM +0100 On 22.02.2020 01:35, Richard Damon wrote: >> - Alf > You still have the issue that if size_t is smaller than int (and > unsigned) the ~ operator will set more bits then the upper bit of size_t Not in the given context, as initializer for a `size_t` constant. > maybe > size_t(~(size_t(-1)/2u))) > but the +1 version I think is cleaner. Not needed. :) - Alf |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment