| aminer68@gmail.com: Aug 29 03:18PM -0700 Hello, More political philosophy about: Is there free will? I have just looked at the following new interesting video of Lex Fridman: Lex Fridman is an AI researcher working on autonomous vehicles, human-robot interaction, and machine learning at MIT and beyond. Read more here about him here: https://lexfridman.com/#:~:text=Lex%20Fridman%3A%20I'm%20an,Podcast%3A%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20Podcast Here is his new video, please look at it carefully: Is there free will? | David Eagleman and Lex Fridman https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8f92iPYmiGY I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, and i will now answer the question of: Is there free will? I think that by analysing humans, we can predict with a probability that this human or that human has a certain "tendency", so it is like probability, so when we analyse a human, without measuring with IQ tests, we can say that a human has a tendency to be smart, then we can say that there is a high probability that he is smart, so then we can give some probabilistic predictions like that, so we can proceed by the same methodology for other human tendencies, so then is there any free will ? so i think that since we can not predict some human tendencies with 100% certainty, so we can logically say that the truth is not that humans have no free will. So i think that humans are a composition of free will and not free will. And more political philosophy about the good taste.. So let us look in the dictionary at what is the taste, it says the following: "The taste is the sense by which the qualities and flavour of a substance are distinguished by the taste buds." Read here in the dictionary to notice it: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/taste But when you are smart you will also notice that there is also the intellectual taste from culture or genetics, i mean that when you are genetically more rational and more smart you will notice that this more rational and more smart is also intellectual taste since with it you are able to be more efficiently selective of your knowledge, so it permits you to enhance quality, and this is also the same for culture, i mean when you enhance more your culture it enhances your intellectual taste and it permits you to be more efficiently selective of your knowledge, so it permits you to enhance quality. So as you are noticing that the intellectual taste is so important.. And i think that i have a good intellectual taste, read my thoughts here to notice it: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.programming/eAvSXpZwFgE Or read also my following thoughts to notice it: https://community.idera.com/developer-tools/general-development/f/getit-and-third-party/72501/pagerank-algorithm---the-mathematics-of-google-search Or read my following thoughts to notice it: https://community.idera.com/developer-tools/general-development/f/getit-and-third-party/71464/about-turing-completeness-and-parallel-programming This also why i said the following: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- I am a white arab, and i think i am more smart and i am an inventor of many scalable algorithms, but today i will speak about a very important thing and it is how to build a civilization, because i think that we have to be smart and notice that so that to build a civilization there is a very important requirement and it is that it must be an effort of building a civilization, so we have not to be like a coward that neglect to be this effort of building a civilization, so the effort of building a civilization is so important, so we have to be responsability, and also we have to know by how we have to be guided to this effort of building a civilization, so we have to be guided by the good taste that also permits to be efficiently selective to be able to be a greater quality or perfection and we have to be not violence that permits to be less individualistic and that permits to be more order and that permits to be more organized. And read the following about the good taste: Why we should stand up for good taste https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20140605-what-makes-good-taste ---------------------------------------------------------------------- So as you are noticing that i am not saying above that civilization needs smartness, because you have to understand that since it is inherent to a civilization that it needs smartness, so i am not talking about it, i am just talking about the above important requirements to be a civilization, and you will notice that i am talking about the following requirement of being civilization: "that we have to be not violence that permits to be less individualistic and that permits to be more order and that permits to be more organized", so as you are noticing that, like in democracy and in morality, it is also extremism of violence that has to be avoided in a civilization and this is in accordance with the tendency of the essence of morality(read below to notice it). More political philosophy about Universal Democracy I have just read the following article on a white supremacist website called National vanguard, so i invite you to read it: Universal Democracy https://nationalvanguard.org/2020/06/universal-democracy/ I don't agree with the article above that we have to limit Democracy that way, because this "universal" Democracy is the basis principle that allows to give a voice to different parts or groups of the society and it allows a kind of balance that avoids to the society to become too violent, so it is an important ingredient in Democracy. Please read my following thoughts to understand more: More political philosophy about white supremacism and neo-nazism.. Read the following new article from a white supremacist website from USA called national vanguard: We Know The True American Type And We Know The Liberal https://nationalvanguard.org/2020/08/we-know-the-true-american-type-and-we-know-the-liberal/ So i am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, so i have to be frank, so look at the following writing of the above article: "Today it teaches the doctrine of liberalism with its pacifism, its love for the inferior and misbegotten, its internationalism which makes a virtue out of treason, its hatred of all who possess strong national feelings, its toothless desire for racial equality, and its tolerance of everything and everyone, particularly the alien and the unfit." So as you are noticing that the above article is making a logical inconsistency, since take for example "beauty", we can say by the same logic as the above article that since beauty is much less important than technical efficiency, so we have to pay beauty much less money than technical efficiency, but if you say so you are questioning the very basic fondations of what we call a civilization, since our kind of civilization comes with a kind of tolerance that permits it , this is part of the backbone of our civilization, it is also this kind of tolerance that permits us to be the right tolerance and compassion towards the unfit and towards the alien, and if you change this, i think this will make our societies much more and too violent societies, so you have to understand it so that to understand the backbone of our civilization. Second logical inconsistency of the above article, it is that those white supremacists are giving too much importance to genetics, neglecting at same time the power of culture and learning and awareness that permit or can permit other ethnic groups such as arabs and south americans and indians to become much better humans. More precision about capitalism and about National Vanguard.. I will be more rigorous, so read again: I have just read the following article from a white supremacist website called National Vanguard: Why Capitalism Fails https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/07/why-capitalism-fails/ And it is saying the following about why capitalism fails: "Capitalism permits inheritance, the command transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner. And therein is the flaw: inherited wealth isn't earned by its owner, yet it leads to a class segregation of men that has nothing to do with how much wealth they have earned; i.e., nothing to do with how much or how well or how significantly they have worked." I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, and i will answer with my fluid intelligence: I think the above article is not taking into account the risk factor and and the smartness factor, so there have to be mechanisms, that are like engines, that "encourage" to or/and "make" a part of the people work by taking risks or great risks and by doing there best (so that to become rich) or/and that "encourage" to or/and "make" the smartest to give there best with there smartness (so that to become rich), so i think capitalism has those mechanisms in form of rewards by allowing to become "rich" and in form of rewards by allowing inheritance, the command transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner: Since it "encourages" to or/and "makes" a part of the people work by taking risks and by doing there best (so that to become rich) or/and it encourages to or/and makes the smartest give there best with there smartness (so that to become rich). And notice that i am also defining taking a "risk" as working "hard". And the above article is saying the following: "Capitalism constantly looks for ways to reduce labor costs. Automation made human labor less necessary than it had been when capitalism first appeared. When automation did appear, people who had the talent, the skills, and the motivation to make contributions began to find no jobs, or to become uncompetitive with mass-production if they tried to employ themselves." I think it is not true, because read the following: https://singularityhub.com/2019/01/01/ai-will-create-millions-more-jobs-than-it-will-destroy-heres-how/ And read the following: Here is the advantages and disadvantages of automation: Following are some of the advantages of automation: 1. Automation is the key to the shorter workweek. Automation will allow the average number of working hours per week to continue to decline, thereby allowing greater leisure hours and a higher quality life. 2. Automation brings safer working conditions for the worker. Since there is less direct physical participation by the worker in the production process, there is less chance of personal injury to the worker. 3. Automated production results in lower prices and better products. It has been estimated that the cost to machine one unit of product by conventional general-purpose machine tools requiring human operators may be 100 times the cost of manufacturing the same unit using automated mass-production techniques. The electronics industry offers many examples of improvements in manufacturing technology that have significantly reduced costs while increasing product value (e.g., colour TV sets, stereo equipment, calculators, and computers). 4. The growth of the automation industry will itself provide employment opportunities. This has been especially true in the computer industry, as the companies in this industry have grown (IBM, Digital Equipment Corp., Honeywell, etc.), new jobs have been created. These new jobs include not only workers directly employed by these companies, but also computer programmers, systems engineers, and other needed to use and operate the computers. 5. Automation is the only means of increasing standard of living. Only through productivity increases brought about by new automated methods of production, it is possible to advance standard of living. Granting wage increases without a commensurate increase in productivity will results in inflation. To afford a better society, it is a must to increase productivity. Following are some of the disadvantages of automation: 1. Automation will result in the subjugation of the human being by a machine. Automation tends to transfer the skill required to perform work from human operators to machines. In so doing, it reduces the need for skilled labour. The manual work left by automation requires lower skill levels and tends to involve rather menial tasks (e.g., loading and unloading workpart, changing tools, removing chips, etc.). In this sense, automation tends to downgrade factory work. 2. There will be a reduction in the labour force, with resulting unemployment. It is logical to argue that the immediate effect of automation will be to reduce the need for human labour, thus displacing workers. 3. Automation will reduce purchasing power. As machines replace workers and these workers join the unemployment ranks, they will not receive the wages necessary to buy the products brought by automation. Markets will become saturated with products that people cannot afford to purchase. Inventories will grow. Production will stop. Unemployment will reach epidemic proportions and the result will be a massive economic depression. And to know more about economy and capitalism, please read my following thoughts: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/wlJu5j1xhPk And read more of my thoughts of my political philosophy here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/8j-rboLzi38 More political philosophy about Meritocracy.. Read the following article about Meritocracy from the Atlantic: https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/12/meritocracy/418074/ So as you notice it says: "The pursuit of meritocracy is more difficult than it appears," So i think in Meritocracy we can not be strict equality, so we have to get into the details and into the calculations to tune it correctly and efficiently so that to make Meritocracy efficient and at the same time less problematic, but we have to notice that Meritocracy is still important. Read my following previous thoughts of my political philosophy: More political philosophy about responsability.. I have just read the following article about Putin: https://www.newsweek.com/putin-says-communism-comes-bible-compares-lenin-saint-781328 And notice that it says the following: "But Putin argues that like Christianity, communism preaches "freedom, brotherhood, equality." He called the Moral Code of the Builder of Communism, a pamphlet of guiding principles for all party members, a "primitive excerpt from the Bible."" I agree that the communism was about "freedom, brotherhood, equality.", but we have to be pragmatic, so we have to be smart and play it smartly since we have to also know how to address the problem of hate, so there must be "responsability", since if we simply call people to freedom and brotherhood and equality, it is not pragmatic, since we have to call them first to responsability that permits to bring such as those qualities, and we have also to be pragmatic since we can not be strict equality(since it is also not Meritocracy, so it is not efficient), but we can be solidarity and collaboration, so now you are understanding why i am talking as i am talking about nationalism and about hate in my thoughts of my political philosophy(read more about hate in my thoughts below), so here is my thoughts of my political philosophy about nationalism: More political philosophy about globalization and nationalism.. I am a white arab and i think i am more smart, so today i will talk about a very important subject about Globalization and nationalism, so i will invite you to look |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment