| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Oct 14 01:14PM -0700 Hello.. More political philosophy about how do look like "white" arabs like me ? As you have noticed i am a white arab and i am a gentleman type of person, and to know further about white arabs, here is a beautiful song of white arabs, and look carefully in the following video at those white arabs to know more how look like white arabs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejvpVhvKesM&list=RDejvpVhvKesM&start_radio=1 Read more my following thoughts about arabs: The average smartness of arabs is on the rise.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, and you have to read the following so that to understand that the average smartness of arabs is on the rise, read the following to notice it: Why IQs Rise When Nations Experience Rapid Economic Development The latest data support these observations by showing that IQs have been rising steadily in countries experiencing the most rapid economic development during the past few decades. As a measure of the interaction between intelligence and modern cognitive stimuli that strengthen capacities for rational classification, quantitative reasoning, etc., a population's average IQ is therefore an indicator of economic modernization and development, not their cause. Read more here: https://evonomics.com/does-your-iq-predict-how-rich-you-will-be/ And read the following about arabs: Arab Americans better educated than most in U.S Read more here to notice it: https://www.michigandaily.com/content/arab-americans-better-educated-most-us And read why are Arab American Students Among the Highest GPA Achievers? Read more here: https://www.arabamerica.com/why-arab-american-students-among-highest-gpa-recipients/ More about arabs.. Look at the following video: Prophet Muhammad was white (Sahih Muslim) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGcCCY0XJGE&t=1s And look at the following video: Why Many Arab Americans Check 'White' On The US Census https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4PwaweUtDw More about arabs and arab inventors and arab thinkers.. I am a white arab from Morocco living in Canada since year 1989, and i am an inventor of many scalable algorithms... I am a white arab, and the name "Moulay" in my family name means that i am genetically and culturally descendent of arabs descendent of prophet Mohamed, and i am genetically a descendent of prophet Mohamed, the "Moulay" in my family name means mawlay in arabic and it means Monsignor, i am called Monsignor because i am white arab genetically and culturally descendent of prophet Mohamed, read about Monsignor here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsignor I am a "white" arab, and as a proof look at this song and how the arab singers from Saudia Arabia in this video are "whites", i am also a white arab that looks like them and i am a gentleman that is more civilized, so look at this song in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abyHF_zG3ng And about Influence of Arabic and Islamic Philosophy on the Latin West, read the following: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/arabic-islamic-influence/ And look at this video at how Mesopotamians that were racially arabs were so advanced: Ancient Mesopotamia Inventions and Technology https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRG3GZ7zLuc And i think arabs are smart people, Babylonians of Irak were racially arabs, read about them here: 3,700-year-old Babylonian tablet rewrites the history of maths - and shows the Greeks did not develop trigonometry Read more here: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/08/24/3700-year-old-babylonian-tablet-rewrites-history-maths-could/ Also read the following about Arabs: Research: Arab Inventors Make the U.S. More Innovative It turns out that the U.S. is a major home for Arab inventors. In the five-year period from 2009 to 2013, there were 8,786 U.S. patent applications in our data set that had at least one Arab inventor. Of the total U.S. patent applications, 3.4% had at least one Arab inventor, despite the fact that Arab inventors represent only 0.3% of the total population. Read more here: https://hbr.org/2017/02/arab-inventors-make-the-u-s-more-innovative Even Steve Jobs the founder of Apple had an arab Syrian immigrant father called Abdul Fattah Jandal. Read more here about it: https://www.macworld.co.uk/feature/apple/who-is-steve-jobs-syrian-immigrant-father-abdul-fattah-jandali-3624958/ About USA and the brain's power.. I have just looked at the following video, look at it carefully: India Is Becoming Its Own Silicon Valley https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHVNWtBuDVk Look in the above video at how the smartest people of high-tech in India are talking about USA, since they are saying that they don't want to come to USA because of Donald Trump(and this is related to my writing below), and i think what they are saying is that Donald Trump and his followers are racism towards other groups that are not of there white European group, so i think USA has made a big mistake by electing Donald Trump, and i think that Germany and other European countries have not to make the same mistake as USA, because read my my following writing to understand why: More political philosophy about immigration.. I am a white arab, and i think i am smart, since i am an inventor of many scalable algorithms and there implementations, and today i will speak about an important subject that is immigration.. Let's look for example at USA, so read the following from Jonathan Wai that is a Ph.D., it says: "Heiner Rindermann and James Thompson uncovered that the "smart fraction" of a country is quite influential in impacting the performance of that country, for example, its GDP." And it also says the following: ""According to recent population estimates, there are about eight Chinese and Indians for every American in the top 1 percent in brains." But consider that the U.S. benefits from the smart fractions of every other country in the world because it continues to serve as a magnet for brainpower, something that is not even factored into these rankings. What these rankings clearly show is America is likely still in the lead in terms of brainpower. And this is despite the fact federal funding for educating our smart fraction is currently zero. Everyone seems worried Americans are falling behind, but this is because everyone is focusing on average and below average people. Maybe it's time we started taking a closer look at the smartest people of our own country." Read more here: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/finding-the-next-einstein/201312/whats-the-smartest-country-in-the-world So as you are noticing it's immigrants(and there are about eight Chinese and Indians for every American in the top 1 percent in brains) that are making USA a rich country. And read also the following to understand more: Why Silicon Valley Wouldn't Work Without Immigrants There are many theories for why immigrants find so much success in tech. Many American-born tech workers point out that there is no shortage of American-born employees to fill the roles at many tech companies. Researchers have found that more than enough students graduate from American colleges to fill available tech jobs. Critics of the industry's friendliness toward immigrants say it comes down to money — that technology companies take advantage of visa programs, like the H-1B system, to get foreign workers at lower prices than they would pay American-born ones. But if that criticism rings true in some parts of the tech industry, it misses the picture among Silicon Valley's top companies. One common misperception of Silicon Valley is that it operates like a factory; in that view, tech companies can hire just about anyone from anywhere in the world to fill a particular role. But today's most ambitious tech companies are not like factories. They're more like athletic teams. They're looking for the LeBrons and Bradys — the best people in the world to come up with some brand-new, never-before-seen widget, to completely reimagine what widgets should do in the first place. "It's not about adding tens or hundreds of thousands of people into manufacturing plants," said Aaron Levie, the co-founder and chief executive of the cloud-storage company Box. "It's about the couple ideas that are going to be invented that are going to change everything." Why do tech honchos believe that immigrants are better at coming up with those inventions? It's partly a numbers thing. As the tech venture capitalist Paul Graham has pointed out, the United States has only 5 percent of the world's population; it stands to reason that most of the world's best new ideas will be thought up by people who weren't born here. If you look at some of the most consequential ideas in tech, you find an unusual number that were developed by immigrants. For instance, Google's entire advertising business — that is, the basis for the vast majority of its revenues and profits, the engine that allows it to hire thousands of people in the United States — was created by three immigrants: Salar Kamangar and Omid Kordestani, who came to the United States from Iran, and Eric Veach, from Canada. But it's not just a numbers thing. Another reason immigrants do so well in tech is that people from outside bring new perspectives that lead to new ideas. Read more here: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/08/technology/personaltech/why-silicon-valley-wouldnt-work-without-immigrants.html Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Oct 14 12:40PM -0700 Hello, Read again, i correct about: Learning to Live with Complexity In software engineering you can by good Code refactoring manage much more efficiently code "complexity", since Potential advantages of Code refactoring may include improved code readability and reduced complexity; these can improve the source code's maintainability and create a simpler, cleaner, or more expressive internal architecture or object model to improve extensibility. But to know more about how to manage complexity, i invite you to read the following very interesting article: Learning to Live with Complexity https://hbr.org/2011/09/learning-to-live-with-complexity Now more political philosophy about specialization and survival.. Look at the following video of DINOSAURS: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIX_Pr9ufR8 So what are you noticing ? So if you are smart you will quickly notice that DINOSAURS have not survived since they were too specialized ! so now you are understanding one of the most important rule in political philosophy and it is that you have to know that being good at adaptability is also knowing how to not be too specialized ! I give you a quick example: Today you have to know how to diversify economy so that to be good at adaptability, and this diversification is also not being too specialized ! (read below my thoughts about Colombia that wanted and is wanting to diversify its economy so that to be much more efficient and much better at adaptability) I give you another example about being too specialized: Also lack of decentralization is also being too specialized, this is why i said about nationalism the following: I think that nationalism is also like too much "centralization", since this too much centralization of nationalism is like a too much monopolize that also hurts quality, and also i think nationalism is too much competition that lacks collaboration and this causes that it hurts quality too, but you have to also understand that the tendency of our today world is to decentralize for better efficiency, not to become nationalism, read my following thoughts to notice: Yet more political philosophy about decentralization.. We can say the following: The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based on democratic principles. But i ask a smart question of: Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be centralized ? Here is my answer: But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't necessarily imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization, and this kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can notice that Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than Dictatorship at fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read my following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU But notice in my above link that i am saying that we have to seek like a balance between competition and collaboration, and i think that it is this new more efficient model of seeking like a balance between competition and collaboration that is the "cause" of bringing decentralization that brings efficiency, and i think that the tendency of our today world is to seek a balance between competition and collaboration. I give you another example of being too specialized: So in "philosophy" we have to ask such the following very important question that is: Is working in a higher level of abstraction better than working on a lower level abstraction? I think that civilization has gone and is going forward towards the future by needing from us to also be "specialization", so i think that both the working at the high level of abstraction and at low level of abstraction are specializations, we can easily notice it by noticing that software engineering works at a higher level of abstraction, and i think it is like a specialization, so i think that computer science is much appropriate way of understanding, since computer science works both at a higher level of abstraction and at the lower level of abstraction , because computer science understand the how it is made and how to build it to a higher level of abstraction, so computer science is both working at a higher level of abstraction and working at a lower level of abstraction, so it "generalizes" better and it is better for adaptability. Read more in all my following thoughts to understand better: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/XgEvO1E9kIU More political philosophy about the smart game that we call human life.. Look at the following video from Colombia: Colombia's booming tech scene https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxPySfuQO_c So as you are noticing that the spirit of the Colombian person that is speaking in the above video is positive(he is positive like me), so as you are noticing that he is playing at the game of human life that is also to diversify the economy, and he is giving a great importance to tech industry and he is giving a great importance to economic integration with other countries, so as you are noticing it is part of the Global optimization since we have to be this optimization so that to become efficient worldwide, so i think that we have to be optimistic since i think that with the exponential progress of our humanity we will become much much more efficient in the near future of 2030. Tech giants' anticompetitive practices investigation - US lawmakers report their findings "In recent years, each company has expanded and exploited their power of the marketplace in anticompetitive ways." "Our investigation leaves no doubt that there is a clear and compelling need for Congress and the antitrust enforcement agencies to take action that restores competition, improves innovation, and safeguards our democracy." Read more here: https://www.computing.co.uk/news/4021278/tech-giants-anticompetitive-practices-investigation-us-lawmakers-report-findings EU targets big tech with tighter target list and rules I have just read the following article, i invite you to read it: Large platforms are invasive, they pay little tax and they destroy competition. This is not the Internet that we wanted, "said another source with direct knowledge of Brussels plans. EU targets big tech with tighter target list and rules https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.developpez.com%2Factu%2F309621%2FL-UE-vise-les-grandes-technologies-avec-une-liste-cible-et-des-regles-plus-strictes-Bruxelles-elargit-la-recherche-de-pouvoirs-supplementaires-pour-limiter-la-puissance-des-plateformes-numeriques%2F I invite you to read all my following thoughts to understand more: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/XgEvO1E9kIU Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Oct 14 12:24PM -0700 Hello.. In software engineering you can by good Code refactoring manage efficiently "complexity", since Potential advantages of Code refactoring may include improved code readability and reduced complexity; these can improve the source code's maintainability and create a simpler, cleaner, or more expressive internal architecture or object model to improve extensibility. But to know more about how to manage complexity, i invite you to read the following very interesting article: Learning to Live with Complexity https://hbr.org/2011/09/learning-to-live-with-complexity Now more political philosophy about specialization and survival.. Look at the following video of DINOSAURS: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIX_Pr9ufR8 So what are you noticing ? So if you are smart you will quickly notice that DINOSAURS have not survived since they were too specialized ! so now you are understanding one of the most important rule in political philosophy and it is that you have to know that being good at adaptability is also knowing how to not be too specialized ! I give you a quick example: Today you have to know how to diversify economy so that to be good at adaptability, and this diversification is also not being too specialized ! (read below my thoughts about Colombia that wanted and is wanting to diversify its economy so that to be much more efficient and much better at adaptability) I give you another example about being too specialized: Also lack of decentralization is also being too specialized, this is why i said about nationalism the following: I think that nationalism is also like too much "centralization", since this too much centralization of nationalism is like a too much monopolize that also hurts quality, and also i think nationalism is too much competition that lacks collaboration and this causes that it hurts quality too, but you have to also understand that the tendency of our today world is to decentralize for better efficiency, not to become nationalism, read my following thoughts to notice: Yet more political philosophy about decentralization.. We can say the following: The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based on democratic principles. But i ask a smart question of: Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be centralized ? Here is my answer: But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't necessarily imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization, and this kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can notice that Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than Dictatorship at fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read my following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU But notice in my above link that i am saying that we have to seek like a balance between competition and collaboration, and i think that it is this new more efficient model of seeking like a balance between competition and collaboration that is the "cause" of bringing decentralization that brings efficiency, and i think that the tendency of our today world is to seek a balance between competition and collaboration. I give you another example of being too specialized: So in "philosophy" we have to ask such the following very important question that is: Is working in a higher level of abstraction better than working on a lower level abstraction? I think that civilization has gone and is going forward towards the future by needing from us to also be "specialization", so i think that both the working at the high level of abstraction and at low level of abstraction are specializations, we can easily notice it by noticing that software engineering works at a higher level of abstraction, and i think it is like a specialization, so i think that computer science is much appropriate way of understanding, since computer science works both at a higher level of abstraction and at the lower level of abstraction , because computer science understand the how it is made and how to build it to a higher level of abstraction, so computer science is both working at a higher level of abstraction and working at a lower level of abstraction, so it "generalizes" better and it is better for adaptability. Read more in all my following thoughts to understand better: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/XgEvO1E9kIU More political philosophy about the smart game that we call human life.. Look at the following video from Colombia: Colombia's booming tech scene https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxPySfuQO_c So as you are noticing that the spirit of the Colombian person that is speaking in the above video is positive(he is positive like me), so as you are noticing that he is playing at the game of human life that is also to diversify the economy, and he is giving a great importance to tech industry and he is giving a great importance to economic integration with other countries, so as you are noticing it is part of the Global optimization since we have to be this optimization so that to become efficient worldwide, so i think that we have to be optimistic since i think that with the exponential progress of our humanity we will become much much more efficient in the near future of 2030. Tech giants' anticompetitive practices investigation - US lawmakers report their findings "In recent years, each company has expanded and exploited their power of the marketplace in anticompetitive ways." "Our investigation leaves no doubt that there is a clear and compelling need for Congress and the antitrust enforcement agencies to take action that restores competition, improves innovation, and safeguards our democracy." Read more here: https://www.computing.co.uk/news/4021278/tech-giants-anticompetitive-practices-investigation-us-lawmakers-report-findings EU targets big tech with tighter target list and rules I have just read the following article, i invite you to read it: Large platforms are invasive, they pay little tax and they destroy competition. This is not the Internet that we wanted, "said another source with direct knowledge of Brussels plans. EU targets big tech with tighter target list and rules https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.developpez.com%2Factu%2F309621%2FL-UE-vise-les-grandes-technologies-avec-une-liste-cible-et-des-regles-plus-strictes-Bruxelles-elargit-la-recherche-de-pouvoirs-supplementaires-pour-limiter-la-puissance-des-plateformes-numeriques%2F I invite you to read all my following thoughts to understand more: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/XgEvO1E9kIU Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment