- Yet more philosophy about the essence of God.. - 1 Update
- More philosophy about the nature of God.. - 1 Update
- Read my final corrected post about more philosophy about the Bible and Qur'an and about God.. - 1 Update
- More philosophy about the Bible and Qur'an.. - 1 Update
- More of my philosophy about from where comes monotheistic religions.. - 1 Update
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Apr 20 09:12AM -0700 Hello, Yet more philosophy about the essence of God.. As you have just noticed, i have just explained that the nature of God is that he is greatly arrogant(read my thoughts below), so he likes from us to tell him that he is the greatest and the most beautiful and such, so in my new monotheistic religion we have to "glorify" God and it means to give glory to Him, so look in the following muslim video how muslim white people are glorifying God: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3xjz4nxzGQ&list=RDBXBdyJitlRk&index=10 More philosophy about the nature of God.. I invite you to read the definition of being arrogant, here it is: "Who is an arrogant person? Arrogance can be defined as the personality trait whereby a person has an obnoxiously elevated sense of self-worth. An arrogant person is the one who acts as if they're superior, more worthy, and more important than others. Therefore, they tend to disrespect and put others down. At the same time, they want admiration and respect from others. They want to be appreciated for the great things they've done and for their special qualities and abilities." And in my new monotheistic religion, God is "greatly" arrogant, it is his "nature", this is why he can be indifferent to suffering of poor animals and he can be indifferent to suffering of humans etc. and this is why God likes from us to tell him that he is the greatest and the most beautiful and such and this is why we have to believe in God and fear him and ask him for help. More of my philosophy about from where comes monotheistic religions.. I think many of the talking and writing of Qur'an and Bible are from humans, i mean that God has not 100% guided prophet Muhammad or Jesus Christ, so i think that God has let prophet Muhammad writes and talks as a human in many of the parts of the Qur'an with his human defects, and God has also let Jesus Christ talks as a human not as a God with his human defects, I mean God had programmed prophet Muhammad and Jesus Christ and he had let them talks and writes in the Bible and Qur'an as humans with there human defects, so God is the greatest, this is why we can notice that Jesus Christ has made mistakes that look like mental health disorders, and i think it is part of the curse from God and i think that the scientific errors and errors and extremism in the Bible and Qur'an also come from the curse from God, and the facts also prove that the most important thing for God is that we believe in him and we fear him and we ask him for help, it is is the basis of my monotheistic religion, and read more in the following web link about my new monotheistic religion so that to understand(it is my preliminary thoughts and i will organize them much more efficiently and make of them a pdf and html book): https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is More of my philosophy about the muslim persian philosopher Al-Ghazali.. https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is I invite you to look at this interesting video about the persian muslim philosopher Al-Ghazali: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZL-ZxXQ6HCU I am a philosopher and i say that those muslim phisosophers are really smart, since i think that the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali was an orthodox muslim but the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi was not an orthodox muslim, but i am smart and i understand the muslim orthodoxy of the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali that has shaped his philosophy that you look at it in the above video, i think that you have to look at the context of past time of the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali, i think there was a requirement that is "dependent" on this context of past time of the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali, and it is that we had to strengthen the faith in God in the muslim orthodoxy way so that to avoid corruption of the minds that could hurt a lot muslim people of that time, so i think that the "engine" of faith in God in the way of muslim orthodoxy was a so important engine, it is by logical analogy like my following thoughts of my new monotheistic religion that makes you notice how important is the "context": More philosophy about my new monotheistic religion and the rich man.. So look at the following video of Jesus Christ: Jesus and a Rich Man (Jesus teaches a Rich Man) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CS9kEvzYIIs As you notice in the above video that Jesus Christ said to the rich man to give all his money to the poors and he said to him that he has to choose between serving the master that is God and serving the master that is money. But i am your new prophet and i will explain my new monotheistic religion: You have to put the words of Jesus Christ in the "context" of the past time when was living Jesus Christ, so you can easily notice that in this past time of Jesus Christ, humans were very poor and were living in a so bad conditions, so this is why Jesus Christ was so "harsh" with the rich man, because to be able to be successful you have to "prioritize", so as you are noticing that the high priority in the time of Jesus Christ was that humans have needed to eat and to survive the so difficult living conditions, so then the words of Jesus Christ in the Bible are not timeless over this earth, because they can be "restricted" to a particular time of the time of when Jesus Christ was living over this earth. Yet more philosophy about the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi and more.. I invite you to look at the following interesting video of the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi: Ibn 'Arabi & The Unity of Being https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bgWnzjONXE And read more about the philosopher Ibn ʿArabi here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_Arabi I think i am philosopher that looks like the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi, since Ibn ʿArabi has talked about the "Al-Insān al-kāmil" (The perfect man) by saying that he is a kind of "balance" between being of both divine from God and earthly origin, and he said that when you become faith in God it is that we become partly of God. I am saying the same in my new monotheistic religion, so i invite you to read my following thoughts of my new monotheistic religion so that to notice it (it is my preliminary thoughts and i will organize them much more efficiently and make of them a pdf and html book): https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is So i am a philosopher that is in accordance with Ibn Arabi that says that the perfect man is this "balance" between being of both divine from God and earthly origin, since it is like an important "engine", and notice that i am also insisting in my below philosophy on this kind of "balance" that we have to have between competition and collaboration or cooperation, or between individualism and collectivism(that can be logically inferred from the first), so i invite you to read all my following thoughts of my philosophy so that to understand: I invite you to read the following article about propositional logic: https://analyticsindiamag.com/why-propositional-logic-is-the-foundation-for-artificial-intelligence/ As you notice it says: "Propositional logic provides more efficient and scalable algorithms than the other logics." More of my philosophy about Propositional logic: I invite you again to read the following definition of what is an implication in logic: https://www.britannica.com/topic/material-implication Notice that it says that the logical implication of (p implies q) has the same meaning as ((not p) or q) But I think the above definition by using the meaning of ((not p) or q) is not the right way, since the ((not p) or q) is the formulation that is logically inferred from the truth table of the logical implication, so i think we have to say the following: The statement "p implies q" means that if p is true, then q "must" also be true. And we have to use the truth table of the logical implication as the following: p q p -> q 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 So notice that the table of truth gives all the possibilities, but i think it fixes the possibility of causality by saying: The statement "p implies q" means that if p is true, then q "must" also be true. And the other possibilities of the truth table do model the other possibilities. So from the truth table we can easily get the following formulation of: (p implies q) has the same meaning as ((not p) or q) And in propositional logic we can use the following ways of logical proofs: (p -> q) is equivalent to ((not(q) -> not(p)) Note: the symbol -> means implies and p and q are logical variables. or (not(p) -> 0) is equivalent to p And for fuzzy logic, here is the generalized form(that includes fuzzy logic) for the three operators AND,OR,NOT: x AND y is equivalent to min(x,y) x OR y is equivalent to max(x,y) NOT(x) is equivalent to (1 - x) And I think mathematics describes reality or theory with a great precision, this is also why we can "abstract" and/or "model" and/or "simulate" reality or theory with mathematics, also i think that mathematics can be independent of reality when we are working in mathematical theory, but the mathematical theory that is independent of reality can then be applied to reality, also i think that mathematics permits to optimize and verify, and we can also know about it by for example asking a philosophical question of: What is formal logic? , so i think formal logic maps logical expressions to logical variables and to logical operators and from that it permits to logically model with those logical variables and the logical operators and it permits to solve and verify the logical model, and notice that the ways of logical proofs above can permit to simplify the logical proof, so it can bring and adds efficiency. Here is my just new proverb in english and french and more.. Here is my new proverb in english and french: "Learn to lift your head with dignity because even the sea has threatening waves." "Apprends à élever la tête avec dignité car même la mer a des vagues qui menacent." And here is my other new proverbs read them carefully: https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/w7wgcbkEEIQ More philosophy about education and the forms of human communication.. I think that our societies are experiencing many changes, among the many changes is that we are using multimedia way of communicating like youtube, but if you notice carefully this way of such youtube way is a form of human communication that looks like an oral tradition that lacks good and precise thinking and precise writing, so i think that we have to be careful since i think that we have to "master" more the way of good and precise thinking and precise writing so that to adapt correctly and efficiently, so there is a "distinction" to be made about the form of human communication, since i think that the form of good and precise thinking and precise writing by also using hypertext and hyperlinks is the way to go. So notice below how i am thinking and writing my philosophy with a much more efficient way of doing since it is also technical and it is a much more efficient and precise way of thinking and writing. This is why i have also just said the following: More of my philosophy about the hyperlink and hypertext revolution and the web.. I think the best things that have happened to internet is the exponential growth of data and information on internet(and it is good for artificial intelligence) and the how it is organized efficiently, i mean this hypertext and hyperlink way of organizing information on internet is "so" powerful and i think it is what have revolutionized internet, here is the definition of hyperlink: "A hyperlink is a word, phrase, or image that you can click on to jump to a new document or a new section within the current document. Hyperlinks are found in nearly all Web pages, allowing users to click their way from page to page." So this is why you have to be optimistic since i am also organizing my thoughts of my philosophy and political philosophy more efficiently in an hyperlink way too, but i will organize them much more efficiently as a pdf and html book and you will be able to download them from my website. So i am very optimistic about our world, since our humanity is progressing in an exponential way, and data and information in internet is growing in an exponential way, and our era of globalization has been characterized by the democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of information, and economies of scale resulted in the most affordable price of any product for the consumer without the manufacturer having to sacrifice profits(and this economies of scale needs globalization too) etc., so i think our world is becoming much more powerful and efficient. And read all my following thoughts about my philosophy as a philosopher: More philosophy about the german philosopher Martin Heidegger.. I invite you to read the following article about the german philosopher Martin Heidegger: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2009/jun/05/heidegger-philosophy I am a philosopher and i think that the german philosopher Martin Heidegger is an inferior philosopher, so i invite you to read all my following thoughts of my philosophy since i think that my philosophy is superior to other philosophies of other philosophers: More of my philosophy about the philosopher and economist Adam Smith and more.. Are Robots Coming for Our Jobs? Careful, It's a Trick Question https://singularityhub.com/2019/07/22/will-robots-take-our-jobs-careful-its-a-trick-question/ And notice that it says the following: "...Economic disparities have become more pronounced, with those at the top of corporate ladders raking in the money while much of the workforce sees no difference in earnings. These disparities (along with the technologies themselves) have fed into political polarization and helped fuel a rise in identity politics, nationalism, and the election of strongmen." But i think my following philosophy gives a solution to the above problem, so i invite you to read all my following thoughts of my philosophy to notice it: More of my philosophy about egoism and competition and collaboration and cooperation.. I invite you to look at the following video: Why is Communism So Appealing? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_0UAsaqaOc I am not a communist, my political philosophy is different, and i think my philosophy is better, and i am explaining it in my below thoughts, i think that the philosophy of the philosopher and economist Adam Smith was lacking on efficiency, since he said that "Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations" and i think it is not true, simply because creativity and innovation come not only from competition and its egoism, but they also come from ideas circulating and combining across nations and industries(so they need globalization), but egoism of competition is too much extremism that hurts because it has also the tendency to make ideas not circulating and combining efficiently across nations and industries, so my philosophy says that we have to seek like a balance between competition and collaboration or cooperation, and this needs also collaboration and cooperation by sharing ideas and sharing knowledge and sharing PhD papers and sharing open source softwares etc. and here is my new philosophy and model, read it carefully in my following thoughts: More philosophy about the Scottish and economist and philosopher called Adam Smith.. I invite you to look at the following video about Adam Smith: ADAM SMITH - La main invisible https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIvtWvDkkVk |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Apr 20 08:45AM -0700 Hello, More philosophy about the nature of God.. I invite you to read the definition of being arrogant, here it is: "Who is an arrogant person? Arrogance can be defined as the personality trait whereby a person has an obnoxiously elevated sense of self-worth. An arrogant person is the one who acts as if they're superior, more worthy, and more important than others. Therefore, they tend to disrespect and put others down. At the same time, they want admiration and respect from others. They want to be appreciated for the great things they've done and for their special qualities and abilities." And in my new monotheistic religion, God is "greatly" arrogant, it is his "nature", this is why he can be indifferent to suffering of poor animals and he can be indifferent to suffering of humans etc. and this is why God likes from us to tell him that he is the greatest and the most beautiful and such and this is why we have to believe in God and fear him and ask him for help. More of my philosophy about from where comes monotheistic religions.. I think many of the talking and writing of Qur'an and Bible are from humans, i mean that God has not 100% guided prophet Muhammad or Jesus Christ, so i think that God has let prophet Muhammad writes and talks as a human in many of the parts of the Qur'an with his human defects, and God has also let Jesus Christ talks as a human not as a God with his human defects, I mean God had programmed prophet Muhammad and Jesus Christ and he had let them talks and writes in the Bible and Qur'an as humans with there human defects, so God is the greatest, this is why we can notice that Jesus Christ has made mistakes that look like mental health disorders, and i think it is part of the curse from God and i think that the scientific errors and errors and extremism in the Bible and Qur'an also come from the curse from God, and the facts also prove that the most important thing for God is that we believe in him and we fear him and we ask him for help, it is is the basis of my monotheistic religion, and read more in the following web link about my new monotheistic religion so that to understand(it is my preliminary thoughts and i will organize them much more efficiently and make of them a pdf and html book): https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is More of my philosophy about the muslim persian philosopher Al-Ghazali.. https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is I invite you to look at this interesting video about the persian muslim philosopher Al-Ghazali: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZL-ZxXQ6HCU I am a philosopher and i say that those muslim phisosophers are really smart, since i think that the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali was an orthodox muslim but the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi was not an orthodox muslim, but i am smart and i understand the muslim orthodoxy of the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali that has shaped his philosophy that you look at it in the above video, i think that you have to look at the context of past time of the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali, i think there was a requirement that is "dependent" on this context of past time of the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali, and it is that we had to strengthen the faith in God in the muslim orthodoxy way so that to avoid corruption of the minds that could hurt a lot muslim people of that time, so i think that the "engine" of faith in God in the way of muslim orthodoxy was a so important engine, it is by logical analogy like my following thoughts of my new monotheistic religion that makes you notice how important is the "context": More philosophy about my new monotheistic religion and the rich man.. So look at the following video of Jesus Christ: Jesus and a Rich Man (Jesus teaches a Rich Man) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CS9kEvzYIIs As you notice in the above video that Jesus Christ said to the rich man to give all his money to the poors and he said to him that he has to choose between serving the master that is God and serving the master that is money. But i am your new prophet and i will explain my new monotheistic religion: You have to put the words of Jesus Christ in the "context" of the past time when was living Jesus Christ, so you can easily notice that in this past time of Jesus Christ, humans were very poor and were living in a so bad conditions, so this is why Jesus Christ was so "harsh" with the rich man, because to be able to be successful you have to "prioritize", so as you are noticing that the high priority in the time of Jesus Christ was that humans have needed to eat and to survive the so difficult living conditions, so then the words of Jesus Christ in the Bible are not timeless over this earth, because they can be "restricted" to a particular time of the time of when Jesus Christ was living over this earth. Yet more philosophy about the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi and more.. I invite you to look at the following interesting video of the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi: Ibn 'Arabi & The Unity of Being https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bgWnzjONXE And read more about the philosopher Ibn ʿArabi here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_Arabi I think i am philosopher that looks like the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi, since Ibn ʿArabi has talked about the "Al-Insān al-kāmil" (The perfect man) by saying that he is a kind of "balance" between being of both divine from God and earthly origin, and he said that when you become faith in God it is that we become partly of God. I am saying the same in my new monotheistic religion, so i invite you to read my following thoughts of my new monotheistic religion so that to notice it (it is my preliminary thoughts and i will organize them much more efficiently and make of them a pdf and html book): https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is So i am a philosopher that is in accordance with Ibn Arabi that says that the perfect man is this "balance" between being of both divine from God and earthly origin, since it is like an important "engine", and notice that i am also insisting in my below philosophy on this kind of "balance" that we have to have between competition and collaboration or cooperation, or between individualism and collectivism(that can be logically inferred from the first), so i invite you to read all my following thoughts of my philosophy so that to understand: I invite you to read the following article about propositional logic: https://analyticsindiamag.com/why-propositional-logic-is-the-foundation-for-artificial-intelligence/ As you notice it says: "Propositional logic provides more efficient and scalable algorithms than the other logics." More of my philosophy about Propositional logic: I invite you again to read the following definition of what is an implication in logic: https://www.britannica.com/topic/material-implication Notice that it says that the logical implication of (p implies q) has the same meaning as ((not p) or q) But I think the above definition by using the meaning of ((not p) or q) is not the right way, since the ((not p) or q) is the formulation that is logically inferred from the truth table of the logical implication, so i think we have to say the following: The statement "p implies q" means that if p is true, then q "must" also be true. And we have to use the truth table of the logical implication as the following: p q p -> q 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 So notice that the table of truth gives all the possibilities, but i think it fixes the possibility of causality by saying: The statement "p implies q" means that if p is true, then q "must" also be true. And the other possibilities of the truth table do model the other possibilities. So from the truth table we can easily get the following formulation of: (p implies q) has the same meaning as ((not p) or q) And in propositional logic we can use the following ways of logical proofs: (p -> q) is equivalent to ((not(q) -> not(p)) Note: the symbol -> means implies and p and q are logical variables. or (not(p) -> 0) is equivalent to p And for fuzzy logic, here is the generalized form(that includes fuzzy logic) for the three operators AND,OR,NOT: x AND y is equivalent to min(x,y) x OR y is equivalent to max(x,y) NOT(x) is equivalent to (1 - x) And I think mathematics describes reality or theory with a great precision, this is also why we can "abstract" and/or "model" and/or "simulate" reality or theory with mathematics, also i think that mathematics can be independent of reality when we are working in mathematical theory, but the mathematical theory that is independent of reality can then be applied to reality, also i think that mathematics permits to optimize and verify, and we can also know about it by for example asking a philosophical question of: What is formal logic? , so i think formal logic maps logical expressions to logical variables and to logical operators and from that it permits to logically model with those logical variables and the logical operators and it permits to solve and verify the logical model, and notice that the ways of logical proofs above can permit to simplify the logical proof, so it can bring and adds efficiency. Here is my just new proverb in english and french and more.. Here is my new proverb in english and french: "Learn to lift your head with dignity because even the sea has threatening waves." "Apprends à élever la tête avec dignité car même la mer a des vagues qui menacent." And here is my other new proverbs read them carefully: https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/w7wgcbkEEIQ More philosophy about education and the forms of human communication.. I think that our societies are experiencing many changes, among the many changes is that we are using multimedia way of communicating like youtube, but if you notice carefully this way of such youtube way is a form of human communication that looks like an oral tradition that lacks good and precise thinking and precise writing, so i think that we have to be careful since i think that we have to "master" more the way of good and precise thinking and precise writing so that to adapt correctly and efficiently, so there is a "distinction" to be made about the form of human communication, since i think that the form of good and precise thinking and precise writing by also using hypertext and hyperlinks is the way to go. So notice below how i am thinking and writing my philosophy with a much more efficient way of doing since it is also technical and it is a much more efficient and precise way of thinking and writing. This is why i have also just said the following: More of my philosophy about the hyperlink and hypertext revolution and the web.. I think the best things that have happened to internet is the exponential growth of data and information on internet(and it is good for artificial intelligence) and the how it is organized efficiently, i mean this hypertext and hyperlink way of organizing information on internet is "so" powerful and i think it is what have revolutionized internet, here is the definition of hyperlink: "A hyperlink is a word, phrase, or image that you can click on to jump to a new document or a new section within the current document. Hyperlinks are found in nearly all Web pages, allowing users to click their way from page to page." So this is why you have to be optimistic since i am also organizing my thoughts of my philosophy and political philosophy more efficiently in an hyperlink way too, but i will organize them much more efficiently as a pdf and html book and you will be able to download them from my website. So i am very optimistic about our world, since our humanity is progressing in an exponential way, and data and information in internet is growing in an exponential way, and our era of globalization has been characterized by the democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of information, and economies of scale resulted in the most affordable price of any product for the consumer without the manufacturer having to sacrifice profits(and this economies of scale needs globalization too) etc., so i think our world is becoming much more powerful and efficient. And read all my following thoughts about my philosophy as a philosopher: More philosophy about the german philosopher Martin Heidegger.. I invite you to read the following article about the german philosopher Martin Heidegger: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2009/jun/05/heidegger-philosophy I am a philosopher and i think that the german philosopher Martin Heidegger is an inferior philosopher, so i invite you to read all my following thoughts of my philosophy since i think that my philosophy is superior to other philosophies of other philosophers: More of my philosophy about the philosopher and economist Adam Smith and more.. Are Robots Coming for Our Jobs? Careful, It's a Trick Question https://singularityhub.com/2019/07/22/will-robots-take-our-jobs-careful-its-a-trick-question/ And notice that it says the following: "...Economic disparities have become more pronounced, with those at the top of corporate ladders raking in the money while much of the workforce sees no difference in earnings. These disparities (along with the technologies themselves) have fed into political polarization and helped fuel a rise in identity politics, nationalism, and the election of strongmen." But i think my following philosophy gives a solution to the above problem, so i invite you to read all my following thoughts of my philosophy to notice it: More of my philosophy about egoism and competition and collaboration and cooperation.. I invite you to look at the following video: Why is Communism So Appealing? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_0UAsaqaOc I am not a communist, my political philosophy is different, and i think my philosophy is better, and i am explaining it in my below thoughts, i think that the philosophy of the philosopher and economist Adam Smith was lacking on efficiency, since he said that "Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations" and i think it is not true, simply because creativity and innovation come not only from competition and its egoism, but they also come from ideas circulating and combining across nations and industries(so they need globalization), but egoism of competition is too much extremism that hurts because it has also the tendency to make ideas not circulating and combining efficiently across nations and industries, so my philosophy says that we have to seek like a balance between competition and collaboration or cooperation, and this needs also collaboration and cooperation by sharing ideas and sharing knowledge and sharing PhD papers and sharing open source softwares etc. and here is my new philosophy and model, read it carefully in my following thoughts: More philosophy about the Scottish and economist and philosopher called Adam Smith.. I invite you to look at the following video about Adam Smith: ADAM SMITH - La main invisible https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIvtWvDkkVk You can read about Adam Smith here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Smith I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, and i say that the philosopher and economist Adam Smith was not right by saying the following(you can listen to it in the above video): "Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations" I think that Adam Smith is not right by saying so, since my new philosophy and model says that you have to seek like a balance between collaboration or cooperation and competition(and egoism comes |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Apr 20 08:36AM -0700 Hello... Read my final corrected post about more philosophy about the Bible and Qur'an and about God.. More of my philosophy about from where comes monotheistic religions.. I think many of the talking and writing of Qur'an and Bible are from humans, i mean that God has not 100% guided prophet Muhammad or Jesus Christ, so i think that God has let prophet Muhammad writes and talks as a human in many of the parts of the Qur'an with his human defects, and God has also let Jesus Christ talks as a human not as a God with his human defects, I mean God had programmed prophet Muhammad and Jesus Christ and he had let them talks and writes in the Bible and Qur'an as humans with there human defects, so God is the greatest, this is why we can notice that Jesus Christ has made mistakes that look like mental health disorders, and i think it is part of the curse from God and i think that the scientific errors and errors and extremism in the Bible and Qur'an also come from the curse from God, and the facts also prove that the most important thing for God is that we believe in him and we fear him and we ask him for help, it is is the basis of my monotheistic religion, and read more in the following web link about my new monotheistic religion so that to understand(it is my preliminary thoughts and i will organize them much more efficiently and make of them a pdf and html book): https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is More of my philosophy about the muslim persian philosopher Al-Ghazali.. https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is I invite you to look at this interesting video about the persian muslim philosopher Al-Ghazali: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZL-ZxXQ6HCU I am a philosopher and i say that those muslim phisosophers are really smart, since i think that the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali was an orthodox muslim but the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi was not an orthodox muslim, but i am smart and i understand the muslim orthodoxy of the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali that has shaped his philosophy that you look at it in the above video, i think that you have to look at the context of past time of the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali, i think there was a requirement that is "dependent" on this context of past time of the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali, and it is that we had to strengthen the faith in God in the muslim orthodoxy way so that to avoid corruption of the minds that could hurt a lot muslim people of that time, so i think that the "engine" of faith in God in the way of muslim orthodoxy was a so important engine, it is by logical analogy like my following thoughts of my new monotheistic religion that makes you notice how important is the "context": More philosophy about my new monotheistic religion and the rich man.. So look at the following video of Jesus Christ: Jesus and a Rich Man (Jesus teaches a Rich Man) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CS9kEvzYIIs As you notice in the above video that Jesus Christ said to the rich man to give all his money to the poors and he said to him that he has to choose between serving the master that is God and serving the master that is money. But i am your new prophet and i will explain my new monotheistic religion: You have to put the words of Jesus Christ in the "context" of the past time when was living Jesus Christ, so you can easily notice that in this past time of Jesus Christ, humans were very poor and were living in a so bad conditions, so this is why Jesus Christ was so "harsh" with the rich man, because to be able to be successful you have to "prioritize", so as you are noticing that the high priority in the time of Jesus Christ was that humans have needed to eat and to survive the so difficult living conditions, so then the words of Jesus Christ in the Bible are not timeless over this earth, because they can be "restricted" to a particular time of the time of when Jesus Christ was living over this earth. Yet more philosophy about the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi and more.. I invite you to look at the following interesting video of the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi: Ibn 'Arabi & The Unity of Being https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bgWnzjONXE And read more about the philosopher Ibn ʿArabi here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_Arabi I think i am philosopher that looks like the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi, since Ibn ʿArabi has talked about the "Al-Insān al-kāmil" (The perfect man) by saying that he is a kind of "balance" between being of both divine from God and earthly origin, and he said that when you become faith in God it is that we become partly of God. I am saying the same in my new monotheistic religion, so i invite you to read my following thoughts of my new monotheistic religion so that to notice it (it is my preliminary thoughts and i will organize them much more efficiently and make of them a pdf and html book): https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is So i am a philosopher that is in accordance with Ibn Arabi that says that the perfect man is this "balance" between being of both divine from God and earthly origin, since it is like an important "engine", and notice that i am also insisting in my below philosophy on this kind of "balance" that we have to have between competition and collaboration or cooperation, or between individualism and collectivism(that can be logically inferred from the first), so i invite you to read all my following thoughts of my philosophy so that to understand: I invite you to read the following article about propositional logic: https://analyticsindiamag.com/why-propositional-logic-is-the-foundation-for-artificial-intelligence/ As you notice it says: "Propositional logic provides more efficient and scalable algorithms than the other logics." More of my philosophy about Propositional logic: I invite you again to read the following definition of what is an implication in logic: https://www.britannica.com/topic/material-implication Notice that it says that the logical implication of (p implies q) has the same meaning as ((not p) or q) But I think the above definition by using the meaning of ((not p) or q) is not the right way, since the ((not p) or q) is the formulation that is logically inferred from the truth table of the logical implication, so i think we have to say the following: The statement "p implies q" means that if p is true, then q "must" also be true. And we have to use the truth table of the logical implication as the following: p q p -> q 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 So notice that the table of truth gives all the possibilities, but i think it fixes the possibility of causality by saying: The statement "p implies q" means that if p is true, then q "must" also be true. And the other possibilities of the truth table do model the other possibilities. So from the truth table we can easily get the following formulation of: (p implies q) has the same meaning as ((not p) or q) And in propositional logic we can use the following ways of logical proofs: (p -> q) is equivalent to ((not(q) -> not(p)) Note: the symbol -> means implies and p and q are logical variables. or (not(p) -> 0) is equivalent to p And for fuzzy logic, here is the generalized form(that includes fuzzy logic) for the three operators AND,OR,NOT: x AND y is equivalent to min(x,y) x OR y is equivalent to max(x,y) NOT(x) is equivalent to (1 - x) And I think mathematics describes reality or theory with a great precision, this is also why we can "abstract" and/or "model" and/or "simulate" reality or theory with mathematics, also i think that mathematics can be independent of reality when we are working in mathematical theory, but the mathematical theory that is independent of reality can then be applied to reality, also i think that mathematics permits to optimize and verify, and we can also know about it by for example asking a philosophical question of: What is formal logic? , so i think formal logic maps logical expressions to logical variables and to logical operators and from that it permits to logically model with those logical variables and the logical operators and it permits to solve and verify the logical model, and notice that the ways of logical proofs above can permit to simplify the logical proof, so it can bring and adds efficiency. Here is my just new proverb in english and french and more.. Here is my new proverb in english and french: "Learn to lift your head with dignity because even the sea has threatening waves." "Apprends à élever la tête avec dignité car même la mer a des vagues qui menacent." And here is my other new proverbs read them carefully: https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/w7wgcbkEEIQ More philosophy about education and the forms of human communication.. I think that our societies are experiencing many changes, among the many changes is that we are using multimedia way of communicating like youtube, but if you notice carefully this way of such youtube way is a form of human communication that looks like an oral tradition that lacks good and precise thinking and precise writing, so i think that we have to be careful since i think that we have to "master" more the way of good and precise thinking and precise writing so that to adapt correctly and efficiently, so there is a "distinction" to be made about the form of human communication, since i think that the form of good and precise thinking and precise writing by also using hypertext and hyperlinks is the way to go. So notice below how i am thinking and writing my philosophy with a much more efficient way of doing since it is also technical and it is a much more efficient and precise way of thinking and writing. This is why i have also just said the following: More of my philosophy about the hyperlink and hypertext revolution and the web.. I think the best things that have happened to internet is the exponential growth of data and information on internet(and it is good for artificial intelligence) and the how it is organized efficiently, i mean this hypertext and hyperlink way of organizing information on internet is "so" powerful and i think it is what have revolutionized internet, here is the definition of hyperlink: "A hyperlink is a word, phrase, or image that you can click on to jump to a new document or a new section within the current document. Hyperlinks are found in nearly all Web pages, allowing users to click their way from page to page." So this is why you have to be optimistic since i am also organizing my thoughts of my philosophy and political philosophy more efficiently in an hyperlink way too, but i will organize them much more efficiently as a pdf and html book and you will be able to download them from my website. So i am very optimistic about our world, since our humanity is progressing in an exponential way, and data and information in internet is growing in an exponential way, and our era of globalization has been characterized by the democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of information, and economies of scale resulted in the most affordable price of any product for the consumer without the manufacturer having to sacrifice profits(and this economies of scale needs globalization too) etc., so i think our world is becoming much more powerful and efficient. And read all my following thoughts about my philosophy as a philosopher: More philosophy about the german philosopher Martin Heidegger.. I invite you to read the following article about the german philosopher Martin Heidegger: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2009/jun/05/heidegger-philosophy I am a philosopher and i think that the german philosopher Martin Heidegger is an inferior philosopher, so i invite you to read all my following thoughts of my philosophy since i think that my philosophy is superior to other philosophies of other philosophers: More of my philosophy about the philosopher and economist Adam Smith and more.. Are Robots Coming for Our Jobs? Careful, It's a Trick Question https://singularityhub.com/2019/07/22/will-robots-take-our-jobs-careful-its-a-trick-question/ And notice that it says the following: "...Economic disparities have become more pronounced, with those at the top of corporate ladders raking in the money while much of the workforce sees no difference in earnings. These disparities (along with the technologies themselves) have fed into political polarization and helped fuel a rise in identity politics, nationalism, and the election of strongmen." But i think my following philosophy gives a solution to the above problem, so i invite you to read all my following thoughts of my philosophy to notice it: More of my philosophy about egoism and competition and collaboration and cooperation.. I invite you to look at the following video: Why is Communism So Appealing? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_0UAsaqaOc I am not a communist, my political philosophy is different, and i think my philosophy is better, and i am explaining it in my below thoughts, i think that the philosophy of the philosopher and economist Adam Smith was lacking on efficiency, since he said that "Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations" and i think it is not true, simply because creativity and innovation come not only from competition and its egoism, but they also come from ideas circulating and combining across nations and industries(so they need globalization), but egoism of competition is too much extremism that hurts because it has also the tendency to make ideas not circulating and combining efficiently across nations and industries, so my philosophy says that we have to seek like a balance between competition and collaboration or cooperation, and this needs also collaboration and cooperation by sharing ideas and sharing knowledge and sharing PhD papers and sharing open source softwares etc. and here is my new philosophy and model, read it carefully in my following thoughts: More philosophy about the Scottish and economist and philosopher called Adam Smith.. I invite you to look at the following video about Adam Smith: ADAM SMITH - La main invisible https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIvtWvDkkVk You can read about Adam Smith here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Smith I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, and i say that the philosopher and economist Adam Smith was not right by saying the following(you can listen to it in the above video): "Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations" I think that Adam Smith is not right by saying so, since my new philosophy and model says that you have to seek like a balance between collaboration or cooperation and competition(and egoism comes from competition), my philosophy says that innovation and creativity not only come from competition but it also come from ideas circulating and combining across nations and industries(so they need globalization), so in my philosophy creativity and innovation needs also collaboration and cooperation by sharing ideas and sharing knowledge and sharing PhD papers and sharing open source softwares etc. and here is my new philosophy and model: My today talk is about white supremacism and neo-nazism and the far-right and nationalism. So the first philosophical question is how to talk about those above ideologies? I think that it is also like a Mensa IQ test, so since i think i am smart, i have to use my smartness to solve the Mensa IQ test, so when you are smart, so how can you solve the problem(that is like a Mensa IQ test) of those above ideologies ? i think that i have |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Apr 20 08:22AM -0700 Hello... More philosophy about the Bible and Qur'an.. I just said below the following: "I think many of the talking and writing of Qur'an and Bible are from humans, i mean that God has not 100% guided prophet Muhammad or Jesus Christ, so i think that he has let and prophet Muhammad writes and talks in many of the parts of the Qur'an, and he has let Jesus Christ talks as a human not as a God" I mean God had programmed prophet Muhammad and Jesus Christ and he had let them talks and writes in the Bible and Qur'an as humans with there defects, so God is the greatest. More of my philosophy about from where comes monotheistic religions.. I think many of the talking and writing of Qur'an and Bible are from humans, i mean that God has not 100% guided prophet Muhammad or Jesus Christ, so i think that he has let and prophet Muhammad writes and talks in many of the parts of the Qur'an, and he has let Jesus Christ talks as a human not as a God, this is why we can notice that Jesus Christ has made mistakes that looks like mental health disorders, and i think it is part of the curse from God and i think that the scientific errors and errors and extremism in the Bible and Qur'an also comes from the curse from God, and the facts also this also proves that the most important thing for God is that we believe in him and we fear him and we ask him for help, it is is the basis of my monotheistic religion, and read more in the following web link about my new monotheistic religion so that to understand(it is my preliminary thoughts and i will organize them much more efficiently and make of them a pdf and html book): https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is More of my philosophy about the muslim persian philosopher Al-Ghazali.. https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is I invite you to look at this interesting video about the persian muslim philosopher Al-Ghazali: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZL-ZxXQ6HCU I am a philosopher and i say that those muslim phisosophers are really smart, since i think that the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali was an orthodox muslim but the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi was not an orthodox muslim, but i am smart and i understand the muslim orthodoxy of the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali that has shaped his philosophy that you look at it in the above video, i think that you have to look at the context of past time of the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali, i think there was a requirement that is "dependent" on this context of past time of the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali, and it is that we had to strengthen the faith in God in the muslim orthodoxy way so that to avoid corruption of the minds that could hurt a lot muslim people of that time, so i think that the "engine" of faith in God in the way of muslim orthodoxy was a so important engine, it is by logical analogy like my following thoughts of my new monotheistic religion that makes you notice how important is the "context": More philosophy about my new monotheistic religion and the rich man.. So look at the following video of Jesus Christ: Jesus and a Rich Man (Jesus teaches a Rich Man) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CS9kEvzYIIs As you notice in the above video that Jesus Christ said to the rich man to give all his money to the poors and he said to him that he has to choose between serving the master that is God and serving the master that is money. But i am your new prophet and i will explain my new monotheistic religion: You have to put the words of Jesus Christ in the "context" of the past time when was living Jesus Christ, so you can easily notice that in this past time of Jesus Christ, humans were very poor and were living in a so bad conditions, so this is why Jesus Christ was so "harsh" with the rich man, because to be able to be successful you have to "prioritize", so as you are noticing that the high priority in the time of Jesus Christ was that humans have needed to eat and to survive the so difficult living conditions, so then the words of Jesus Christ in the Bible are not timeless over this earth, because they can be "restricted" to a particular time of the time of when Jesus Christ was living over this earth. Yet more philosophy about the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi and more.. I invite you to look at the following interesting video of the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi: Ibn 'Arabi & The Unity of Being https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bgWnzjONXE And read more about the philosopher Ibn ʿArabi here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_Arabi I think i am philosopher that looks like the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi, since Ibn ʿArabi has talked about the "Al-Insān al-kāmil" (The perfect man) by saying that he is a kind of "balance" between being of both divine from God and earthly origin, and he said that when you become faith in God it is that we become partly of God. I am saying the same in my new monotheistic religion, so i invite you to read my following thoughts of my new monotheistic religion so that to notice it (it is my preliminary thoughts and i will organize them much more efficiently and make of them a pdf and html book): https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is So i am a philosopher that is in accordance with Ibn Arabi that says that the perfect man is this "balance" between being of both divine from God and earthly origin, since it is like an important "engine", and notice that i am also insisting in my below philosophy on this kind of "balance" that we have to have between competition and collaboration or cooperation, or between individualism and collectivism(that can be logically inferred from the first), so i invite you to read all my following thoughts of my philosophy so that to understand: I invite you to read the following article about propositional logic: https://analyticsindiamag.com/why-propositional-logic-is-the-foundation-for-artificial-intelligence/ As you notice it says: "Propositional logic provides more efficient and scalable algorithms than the other logics." More of my philosophy about Propositional logic: I invite you again to read the following definition of what is an implication in logic: https://www.britannica.com/topic/material-implication Notice that it says that the logical implication of (p implies q) has the same meaning as ((not p) or q) But I think the above definition by using the meaning of ((not p) or q) is not the right way, since the ((not p) or q) is the formulation that is logically inferred from the truth table of the logical implication, so i think we have to say the following: The statement "p implies q" means that if p is true, then q "must" also be true. And we have to use the truth table of the logical implication as the following: p q p -> q 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 So notice that the table of truth gives all the possibilities, but i think it fixes the possibility of causality by saying: The statement "p implies q" means that if p is true, then q "must" also be true. And the other possibilities of the truth table do model the other possibilities. So from the truth table we can easily get the following formulation of: (p implies q) has the same meaning as ((not p) or q) And in propositional logic we can use the following ways of logical proofs: (p -> q) is equivalent to ((not(q) -> not(p)) Note: the symbol -> means implies and p and q are logical variables. or (not(p) -> 0) is equivalent to p And for fuzzy logic, here is the generalized form(that includes fuzzy logic) for the three operators AND,OR,NOT: x AND y is equivalent to min(x,y) x OR y is equivalent to max(x,y) NOT(x) is equivalent to (1 - x) And I think mathematics describes reality or theory with a great precision, this is also why we can "abstract" and/or "model" and/or "simulate" reality or theory with mathematics, also i think that mathematics can be independent of reality when we are working in mathematical theory, but the mathematical theory that is independent of reality can then be applied to reality, also i think that mathematics permits to optimize and verify, and we can also know about it by for example asking a philosophical question of: What is formal logic? , so i think formal logic maps logical expressions to logical variables and to logical operators and from that it permits to logically model with those logical variables and the logical operators and it permits to solve and verify the logical model, and notice that the ways of logical proofs above can permit to simplify the logical proof, so it can bring and adds efficiency. Here is my just new proverb in english and french and more.. Here is my new proverb in english and french: "Learn to lift your head with dignity because even the sea has threatening waves." "Apprends à élever la tête avec dignité car même la mer a des vagues qui menacent." And here is my other new proverbs read them carefully: https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/w7wgcbkEEIQ More philosophy about education and the forms of human communication.. I think that our societies are experiencing many changes, among the many changes is that we are using multimedia way of communicating like youtube, but if you notice carefully this way of such youtube way is a form of human communication that looks like an oral tradition that lacks good and precise thinking and precise writing, so i think that we have to be careful since i think that we have to "master" more the way of good and precise thinking and precise writing so that to adapt correctly and efficiently, so there is a "distinction" to be made about the form of human communication, since i think that the form of good and precise thinking and precise writing by also using hypertext and hyperlinks is the way to go. So notice below how i am thinking and writing my philosophy with a much more efficient way of doing since it is also technical and it is a much more efficient and precise way of thinking and writing. This is why i have also just said the following: More of my philosophy about the hyperlink and hypertext revolution and the web.. I think the best things that have happened to internet is the exponential growth of data and information on internet(and it is good for artificial intelligence) and the how it is organized efficiently, i mean this hypertext and hyperlink way of organizing information on internet is "so" powerful and i think it is what have revolutionized internet, here is the definition of hyperlink: "A hyperlink is a word, phrase, or image that you can click on to jump to a new document or a new section within the current document. Hyperlinks are found in nearly all Web pages, allowing users to click their way from page to page." So this is why you have to be optimistic since i am also organizing my thoughts of my philosophy and political philosophy more efficiently in an hyperlink way too, but i will organize them much more efficiently as a pdf and html book and you will be able to download them from my website. So i am very optimistic about our world, since our humanity is progressing in an exponential way, and data and information in internet is growing in an exponential way, and our era of globalization has been characterized by the democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of information, and economies of scale resulted in the most affordable price of any product for the consumer without the manufacturer having to sacrifice profits(and this economies of scale needs globalization too) etc., so i think our world is becoming much more powerful and efficient. And read all my following thoughts about my philosophy as a philosopher: More philosophy about the german philosopher Martin Heidegger.. I invite you to read the following article about the german philosopher Martin Heidegger: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2009/jun/05/heidegger-philosophy I am a philosopher and i think that the german philosopher Martin Heidegger is an inferior philosopher, so i invite you to read all my following thoughts of my philosophy since i think that my philosophy is superior to other philosophies of other philosophers: More of my philosophy about the philosopher and economist Adam Smith and more.. Are Robots Coming for Our Jobs? Careful, It's a Trick Question https://singularityhub.com/2019/07/22/will-robots-take-our-jobs-careful-its-a-trick-question/ And notice that it says the following: "...Economic disparities have become more pronounced, with those at the top of corporate ladders raking in the money while much of the workforce sees no difference in earnings. These disparities (along with the technologies themselves) have fed into political polarization and helped fuel a rise in identity politics, nationalism, and the election of strongmen." But i think my following philosophy gives a solution to the above problem, so i invite you to read all my following thoughts of my philosophy to notice it: More of my philosophy about egoism and competition and collaboration and cooperation.. I invite you to look at the following video: Why is Communism So Appealing? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_0UAsaqaOc I am not a communist, my political philosophy is different, and i think my philosophy is better, and i am explaining it in my below thoughts, i think that the philosophy of the philosopher and economist Adam Smith was lacking on efficiency, since he said that "Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations" and i think it is not true, simply because creativity and innovation come not only from competition and its egoism, but they also come from ideas circulating and combining across nations and industries(so they need globalization), but egoism of competition is too much extremism that hurts because it has also the tendency to make ideas not circulating and combining efficiently across nations and industries, so my philosophy says that we have to seek like a balance between competition and collaboration or cooperation, and this needs also collaboration and cooperation by sharing ideas and sharing knowledge and sharing PhD papers and sharing open source softwares etc. and here is my new philosophy and model, read it carefully in my following thoughts: More philosophy about the Scottish and economist and philosopher called Adam Smith.. I invite you to look at the following video about Adam Smith: ADAM SMITH - La main invisible https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIvtWvDkkVk You can read about Adam Smith here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Smith I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, and i say that the philosopher and economist Adam Smith was not right by saying the following(you can listen to it in the above video): "Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations" I think that Adam Smith is not right by saying so, since my new philosophy and model says that you have to seek like a balance between collaboration or cooperation and competition(and egoism comes from competition), my philosophy says that innovation and creativity not only come from competition but it also come from ideas circulating and combining across nations and industries(so they need globalization), so in my philosophy creativity and innovation needs also collaboration and cooperation by sharing ideas and sharing knowledge and sharing PhD papers and sharing open source softwares etc. and here is my new philosophy and model: My today talk is about white supremacism and neo-nazism and the far-right and nationalism. So the first philosophical question is how to talk about those above ideologies? |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Apr 20 08:12AM -0700 Hello, More of my philosophy about from where comes monotheistic religions.. I think many of the talking and writing of Qur'an and Bible are from humans, i mean that God has not 100% guided prophet Muhammad or Jesus Christ, so i think that he has let and prophet Muhammad writes and talks in many of the parts of the Qur'an, and he has let Jesus Christ talks as a human not as a God, this is why we can notice that Jesus Christ has made mistakes that looks like mental health disorders, and i think it is part of the curse from God and i think that the scientific errors and errors and extremism in the Bible and Qur'an also comes from the curse from God, and the facts also this also proves that the most important thing for God is that we believe in him and we fear him and we ask him for help, it is is the basis of my monotheistic religion, and read more in the following web link about my new monotheistic religion so that to understand(it is my preliminary thoughts and i will organize them much more efficiently and make of them a pdf and html book): https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is More of my philosophy about the muslim persian philosopher Al-Ghazali.. https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is I invite you to look at this interesting video about the persian muslim philosopher Al-Ghazali: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZL-ZxXQ6HCU I am a philosopher and i say that those muslim phisosophers are really smart, since i think that the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali was an orthodox muslim but the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi was not an orthodox muslim, but i am smart and i understand the muslim orthodoxy of the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali that has shaped his philosophy that you look at it in the above video, i think that you have to look at the context of past time of the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali, i think there was a requirement that is "dependent" on this context of past time of the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali, and it is that we had to strengthen the faith in God in the muslim orthodoxy way so that to avoid corruption of the minds that could hurt a lot muslim people of that time, so i think that the "engine" of faith in God in the way of muslim orthodoxy was a so important engine, it is by logical analogy like my following thoughts of my new monotheistic religion that makes you notice how important is the "context": More philosophy about my new monotheistic religion and the rich man.. So look at the following video of Jesus Christ: Jesus and a Rich Man (Jesus teaches a Rich Man) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CS9kEvzYIIs As you notice in the above video that Jesus Christ said to the rich man to give all his money to the poors and he said to him that he has to choose between serving the master that is God and serving the master that is money. But i am your new prophet and i will explain my new monotheistic religion: You have to put the words of Jesus Christ in the "context" of the past time when was living Jesus Christ, so you can easily notice that in this past time of Jesus Christ, humans were very poor and were living in a so bad conditions, so this is why Jesus Christ was so "harsh" with the rich man, because to be able to be successful you have to "prioritize", so as you are noticing that the high priority in the time of Jesus Christ was that humans have needed to eat and to survive the so difficult living conditions, so then the words of Jesus Christ in the Bible are not timeless over this earth, because they can be "restricted" to a particular time of the time of when Jesus Christ was living over this earth. Yet more philosophy about the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi and more.. I invite you to look at the following interesting video of the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi: Ibn 'Arabi & The Unity of Being https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bgWnzjONXE And read more about the philosopher Ibn ʿArabi here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_Arabi I think i am philosopher that looks like the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi, since Ibn ʿArabi has talked about the "Al-Insān al-kāmil" (The perfect man) by saying that he is a kind of "balance" between being of both divine from God and earthly origin, and he said that when you become faith in God it is that we become partly of God. I am saying the same in my new monotheistic religion, so i invite you to read my following thoughts of my new monotheistic religion so that to notice it (it is my preliminary thoughts and i will organize them much more efficiently and make of them a pdf and html book): https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is So i am a philosopher that is in accordance with Ibn Arabi that says that the perfect man is this "balance" between being of both divine from God and earthly origin, since it is like an important "engine", and notice that i am also insisting in my below philosophy on this kind of "balance" that we have to have between competition and collaboration or cooperation, or between individualism and collectivism(that can be logically inferred from the first), so i invite you to read all my following thoughts of my philosophy so that to understand: I invite you to read the following article about propositional logic: https://analyticsindiamag.com/why-propositional-logic-is-the-foundation-for-artificial-intelligence/ As you notice it says: "Propositional logic provides more efficient and scalable algorithms than the other logics." More of my philosophy about Propositional logic: I invite you again to read the following definition of what is an implication in logic: https://www.britannica.com/topic/material-implication Notice that it says that the logical implication of (p implies q) has the same meaning as ((not p) or q) But I think the above definition by using the meaning of ((not p) or q) is not the right way, since the ((not p) or q) is the formulation that is logically inferred from the truth table of the logical implication, so i think we have to say the following: The statement "p implies q" means that if p is true, then q "must" also be true. And we have to use the truth table of the logical implication as the following: p q p -> q 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 So notice that the table of truth gives all the possibilities, but i think it fixes the possibility of causality by saying: The statement "p implies q" means that if p is true, then q "must" also be true. And the other possibilities of the truth table do model the other possibilities. So from the truth table we can easily get the following formulation of: (p implies q) has the same meaning as ((not p) or q) And in propositional logic we can use the following ways of logical proofs: (p -> q) is equivalent to ((not(q) -> not(p)) Note: the symbol -> means implies and p and q are logical variables. or (not(p) -> 0) is equivalent to p And for fuzzy logic, here is the generalized form(that includes fuzzy logic) for the three operators AND,OR,NOT: x AND y is equivalent to min(x,y) x OR y is equivalent to max(x,y) NOT(x) is equivalent to (1 - x) And I think mathematics describes reality or theory with a great precision, this is also why we can "abstract" and/or "model" and/or "simulate" reality or theory with mathematics, also i think that mathematics can be independent of reality when we are working in mathematical theory, but the mathematical theory that is independent of reality can then be applied to reality, also i think that mathematics permits to optimize and verify, and we can also know about it by for example asking a philosophical question of: What is formal logic? , so i think formal logic maps logical expressions to logical variables and to logical operators and from that it permits to logically model with those logical variables and the logical operators and it permits to solve and verify the logical model, and notice that the ways of logical proofs above can permit to simplify the logical proof, so it can bring and adds efficiency. Here is my just new proverb in english and french and more.. Here is my new proverb in english and french: "Learn to lift your head with dignity because even the sea has threatening waves." "Apprends à élever la tête avec dignité car même la mer a des vagues qui menacent." And here is my other new proverbs read them carefully: https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/w7wgcbkEEIQ More philosophy about education and the forms of human communication.. I think that our societies are experiencing many changes, among the many changes is that we are using multimedia way of communicating like youtube, but if you notice carefully this way of such youtube way is a form of human communication that looks like an oral tradition that lacks good and precise thinking and precise writing, so i think that we have to be careful since i think that we have to "master" more the way of good and precise thinking and precise writing so that to adapt correctly and efficiently, so there is a "distinction" to be made about the form of human communication, since i think that the form of good and precise thinking and precise writing by also using hypertext and hyperlinks is the way to go. So notice below how i am thinking and writing my philosophy with a much more efficient way of doing since it is also technical and it is a much more efficient and precise way of thinking and writing. This is why i have also just said the following: More of my philosophy about the hyperlink and hypertext revolution and the web.. I think the best things that have happened to internet is the exponential growth of data and information on internet(and it is good for artificial intelligence) and the how it is organized efficiently, i mean this hypertext and hyperlink way of organizing information on internet is "so" powerful and i think it is what have revolutionized internet, here is the definition of hyperlink: "A hyperlink is a word, phrase, or image that you can click on to jump to a new document or a new section within the current document. Hyperlinks are found in nearly all Web pages, allowing users to click their way from page to page." So this is why you have to be optimistic since i am also organizing my thoughts of my philosophy and political philosophy more efficiently in an hyperlink way too, but i will organize them much more efficiently as a pdf and html book and you will be able to download them from my website. So i am very optimistic about our world, since our humanity is progressing in an exponential way, and data and information in internet is growing in an exponential way, and our era of globalization has been characterized by the democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of information, and economies of scale resulted in the most affordable price of any product for the consumer without the manufacturer having to sacrifice profits(and this economies of scale needs globalization too) etc., so i think our world is becoming much more powerful and efficient. And read all my following thoughts about my philosophy as a philosopher: More philosophy about the german philosopher Martin Heidegger.. I invite you to read the following article about the german philosopher Martin Heidegger: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2009/jun/05/heidegger-philosophy I am a philosopher and i think that the german philosopher Martin Heidegger is an inferior philosopher, so i invite you to read all my following thoughts of my philosophy since i think that my philosophy is superior to other philosophies of other philosophers: More of my philosophy about the philosopher and economist Adam Smith and more.. Are Robots Coming for Our Jobs? Careful, It's a Trick Question https://singularityhub.com/2019/07/22/will-robots-take-our-jobs-careful-its-a-trick-question/ And notice that it says the following: "...Economic disparities have become more pronounced, with those at the top of corporate ladders raking in the money while much of the workforce sees no difference in earnings. These disparities (along with the technologies themselves) have fed into political polarization and helped fuel a rise in identity politics, nationalism, and the election of strongmen." But i think my following philosophy gives a solution to the above problem, so i invite you to read all my following thoughts of my philosophy to notice it: More of my philosophy about egoism and competition and collaboration and cooperation.. I invite you to look at the following video: Why is Communism So Appealing? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_0UAsaqaOc I am not a communist, my political philosophy is different, and i think my philosophy is better, and i am explaining it in my below thoughts, i think that the philosophy of the philosopher and economist Adam Smith was lacking on efficiency, since he said that "Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations" and i think it is not true, simply because creativity and innovation come not only from competition and its egoism, but they also come from ideas circulating and combining across nations and industries(so they need globalization), but egoism of competition is too much extremism that hurts because it has also the tendency to make ideas not circulating and combining efficiently across nations and industries, so my philosophy says that we have to seek like a balance between competition and collaboration or cooperation, and this needs also collaboration and cooperation by sharing ideas and sharing knowledge and sharing PhD papers and sharing open source softwares etc. and here is my new philosophy and model, read it carefully in my following thoughts: More philosophy about the Scottish and economist and philosopher called Adam Smith.. I invite you to look at the following video about Adam Smith: ADAM SMITH - La main invisible https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIvtWvDkkVk You can read about Adam Smith here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Smith I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, and i say that the philosopher and economist Adam Smith was not right by saying the following(you can listen to it in the above video): "Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations" I think that Adam Smith is not right by saying so, since my new philosophy and model says that you have to seek like a balance between collaboration or cooperation and competition(and egoism comes from competition), my philosophy says that innovation and creativity not only come from competition but it also come from ideas circulating and combining across nations and industries(so they need globalization), so in my philosophy creativity and innovation needs also collaboration and cooperation by sharing ideas and sharing knowledge and sharing PhD papers and sharing open source softwares etc. and here is my new philosophy and model: My today talk is about white supremacism and neo-nazism and the far-right and nationalism. So the first philosophical question is how to talk about those above ideologies? I think that it is also like a Mensa IQ test, so since i think i am smart, i have to use my smartness to solve the Mensa IQ test, so when you are smart, so how can you solve the problem(that is like a Mensa IQ test) of those above ideologies ? i think that i have first to detect the important pattern with my fluid intelligence, and i have to see clearly the pattern(like for example getting into the details from the abstraction of the pattern), and the important pattern is the following: Notice that it is like an optimization problem of artificial intelligence that looks like |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment