- More precision about more philosophy about wich philosophy is better? - 1 Update
- More philosophy about wich philosophy is better? - 1 Update
- More philosophy about how to be a successful country.. - 1 Update
- Yet more philosophy about the smart patterns and about abstraction.. - 1 Update
- More philosophy about the smart patterns and about abstraction.. - 1 Update
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: May 04 01:28PM -0700 Hello, More precision about more philosophy about wich philosophy is better? Read again the following article: 'Happiness Tech' Is On the Rise. Is It Working? https://singularityhub.com/2018/09/02/happiness-tech-is-on-the-rise-is-it-working/ So notice that it is saying the following: "The ancients had a much better view of it. They offered an approach of not trying to control things you can't control, and of lessening your desires and your expectations so you achieve a harmony between what you desire and what you have. A core part of feeling more happy is about re-wiring our minds to adjust our expectations, exercise gratitude, escape negative narratives, and live in the present moment." But i think i am smart and i think this way of lessening your desires and your expectations is not pragmatic and i don't think it works, since notice that the above article is also calling us to practice indian meditation, but i think indian meditation has two problems and they are the following: 1- I invite you to look at the following video about indian meditation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHelfPFLXbs I don't agree with indian meditation that wants us to stop seeking pleasure of the senses, i think that indian meditation wants like to solve the problem of materialism that causes problems such as violence between the rich and not rich etc. but i think that my philosophy is much better than indian meditation 2- The way of Indian meditation is lacking too much on proactivity that we require and that is provided by my new philosophy below. And i think that my philosophy is a superior philosophy, so i think i am a smart philosopher and here is the basis of my new philosophy, read it carefully: More philosophy about the strenght of philosophy.. I will ask a smart philosophical question: Is human life sad ? I think i am a philosopher and i will answer this question: When you are smart you will know that morality needs the right "balance", like a balance between competition and collaboration, or like a balance between individualism and collectivism, so human life is the same, it needs requirements so that to be pleasure of life, for example human life needs the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty and that brings pleasure, so i think human life has this kind of alternances that brings happiness and pleasures as an essence, for example when this Coronavirus crisis will be over, we will have learned how to appreciate more our kind of civilization or pleasures of life, so the sadness of Coronavirus crisis will soon bring happiness and pleasures of life when Coronavirus crisis will be over, so as you are noticing it is like the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty and pleasure, so you have to read my philosophy below about from where comes happiness and pleasures of life so that you understand that human life is not absurd and is not sad. More philosophy about the great movie called Cast Away.. I invite you to look at the following short video of a great movie called Cast Away: Academy Award®-winning filmmaker Robert Zemeckis and two-time Oscar winner Tom Hanks reunite to explore the blessings and heartache of fate and the survival of the human spirit. Tom Hanks gives one of the towering screen performances of all time as Chuck Noland, a FedEx systems engineer whose ruled-by-the-clock existence abruptly ends when a harrowing plane crash leaves him isolated on a remote island. As Chuck struggles to survive, he finds that his own personal journey has only just begun... Look here at the following short video of this great movie called Cast Away: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zZ3UYd1UxA I think you have to look or look again at this great movie, because when you are smart you will notice that the movie also learns you the way of my philosophy below, i mean that Chuck Noland in the video(that is Tom Hanks) is getting like more and more hungry for our kind of civilization by being isolated on a remote island and he is learning to understand the way of my philosophy below about from where comes happiness and pleasures of life, because by being isolated on a remote island he is also learning to appreciate our kind civilization and this is also from where comes happiness, so you have to be smart by reading my following thoughts of my philosophy about from where comes happiness and pleasures of life and by at the same time making the logical analogy with the great movie above that we call Cast Away: From where comes happiness and pleasures of life? It is like beauty of the alternance of the day and night, from this alternance of the day and night comes beauty and a kind of pleasure, so i think that happiness comes from this kind of alternance, i mean that for example you will get a great pleasure from eating a Moroccan Couscous Bidaoui(read about it below) when you are hungry, so from this alternance of being hungry and eating a Moroccan Couscous comes this great pleasure of life that gives happiness and that gives the meaning of life, so you have to know how to be this alternance , i mean when for example you work hard and after that you give yourself peace by taking a rest and you also give yourself a pleasure like eating a Moroccan Couscous Bidaoui, you will get a great pleasure, so you have to know how to be this alternance of being hard work and giving yourself peace by taking a rest, this is from where comes happiness and this is from where comes the meaning of human existence, read all my following philosophy to understand more: More of my philosophy about pleasures of life.. As you have noticed i have talked before about the meaning and purpose of life (read below my thoughts).. And here is more explanation of what i was saying about pleasures of life: 101 Simple Pleasures to Boost Happiness According to Gretchen Rubin, author of The Happiness Project and Happier at Home. "It's not life changes like a new house or a fancy car that make the most impact, but sometimes little things like the smell of an orange, that give the biggest happiness boost," says Rubin. Read more here: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/simple-pleasures_b_3038326 So as you have just noticed that my philosophy is a new philosophy that doesn't look like the others, and the architectural ideas of my philosophy are the following: There is an absolute and a relative way of measuring, so when we measure absolutely(i mean completely or totally) the meaning of human life, so like in the case of absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, we can say: "Absurdism arises out of the tension between our desire for order, meaning and happiness and, on the other hand, the indifferent natural universe's refusal to provide that", hence when we are measuring absolutely the meaning of life, we can say that human life is absurd, but the question in philosophy is: Is human life absurd? In my philosophy human life is not absurd, because i say that happiness comes from enjoying pleasures of life that we feel with our senses we humans, and i am also defining the human sense as the one that comes from the brain and from consciousness that gives pleasure, i mean that when you are "learning" by looking at a video on youtube it can give a pleasure inside your brain that comes from the brain and from consciousness, so when you are happiness by enjoying pleasures of life with your human senses, you are enjoying life and you are not thinking about the "absolute" meaning of human life, but the meaning of human life becomes "relative", and since it becomes this relativeness so human life becomes not absurd, since this enjoying pleasures of life with our human senses is "like" a powerful "drug" that permit to be happy and to not to be preoccupied with the absolute meaning of human life that is talking about the philosopher Albert Camus. More philosophy and psychology about how to appreciate pleasures of life.. I invite you to look at the following interesting video, becauseit is also like philosophy, so look at it carefully and my thoughts about it are below: The story of my life - From a dream to reality https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wFsYY71wyk I think that this swedish women is an artist and photographer that is locally smart in what she is doing, since she is like creating pleasures of life by showing us her videos of the beautiful Sweden's nature, but the weakness of what she is doing is that this swedish women is not a philosopher like me, so she is not understanding correctly, because she is thinking that happiness comes from those high quality pleasures of life of the so beautiful Sweden's nature that she is showing in her videos, but i think it is a mistake, since not all people have those "high" quality pleasures of life, so in my philosophy(read about it below) i am explaining that happiness comes not only from pleasures of life, but it also comes from the alternance of being "hungry" for taking a rest and taking a rest or from the alternance of being hungry and eating a delicious meal, so happiness comes from the difficulties of life that make us more hungry for or make us appreciate much more the pleasures of life, so they make us more happy, and i think this is the secret of life. More about my philosophy and about human existence.. I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, and now i will explain more my philosophy so that you understand it: Our era of globalization has been characterized by the democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of information, and from where do you think comes this progress ? i think it comes from the "exponential" progress of our humanity, and you have to understand this exponential progress of our humanity correctly by reading my below thoughts, other than that i think that those democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of information have like democratized happiness too, i mean that before those democratizations brought by the exponential progress of our humanity, Lower social class and lower middle class had to be rich to be able to be happy, because we were lacking technology and lacking tools that permit to be happy without being rich, so this is why humanity was much more violent because the not rich was violently fighting the rich etc. so we had violent ideologies like communism and nazism etc. but i think that today with the big advancement of technology and science etc. we are able to be happy without being rich, and read my below thoughts to understand how and to understand my philosophy about it, and read my following thoughts about democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of information so that you understand more: And look at the following video: Why Israel is a Tech Capital of the World https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuPx61911Oo I think that this jewish from Israel that is talking in the above video is not thinking correctly, because there is two important things that you must have so that a country be successful: Capital and talents, the above video is making a mistake by saying that you need the two so that to be successful, i mean it is saying that you need Capital and talents, but i think he is making a mistake, because i think that Capital can attract talents, so Capital can make you successful as a country, so then i can logically infer that so that to have capital that make you successful, you have to know how to construct a product or services that you can sell from those competitive advantages of competitive part or parts of product or service that can come from you or/and can come from different countries of the global world, and it is i think an efficient way that makes you adapt quickly and efficiently in this globalization, and notice with me that having competitive part or parts of a product or service doesn't mean it has to come from R&D(Research and development), also the above video of the jewish from Israel is not saying that Capital can come from "democratization" of finance, since you have to know that our global world has changed very much by being democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of information, read my following thoughts so that you also understand that Capital also comes from democratization of finance: More about "democratization" of finance.. This "democratization" of finance is also for Research and Development (R&D)).. And look at the following "democratization" of finance so that to understand: The 4 tools making capital more abundant than it's ever been Read more here: https://singularityhub.com/2018/07/19/the-4-tools-making-capital-more-abundant-than-its-ever-been/ About democratization of digital technology and technology and Research and Development (R&D) investment This is also why i said the following: Look at the following interesting video: Can South Korea lead global innovation in Fourth Industrial Era? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUw8gCShEcI But i think that this minister of education, science and technology of south Korea looks somewhat archaic since he is not taking correctly into account the democratization of digital technology and Technology that permits you to economically grow very rapidly and much cheaply than using "expensive" Research and Development (R&D) investment, so i think that he is not correctly adapting to the realities, because the economic realities have very much changed, since also our era of globalization has been characterized by the democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of information. Here is more proof of what i am saying: 2. Question: What do you mean by "Democratizing Innovation"? Eric von Hippel: The tools for designing high-quality innovations are getting so cheap and so ubiquitous that individuals can innovate for themselves at a steadily higher quality and at a steadily decreasing cost. These sophisticated modern tools are computer-based, and require relatively little training and practice. As a result, even hobbyist users find they can use them to design new products and services. Read more here: Democratizing Innovation: The Shift of Innovation to Users https://www.ideaconnection.com/interviews/00010-Democratizing-Innovation-The-Shift-of-Innovation.html Am i a philosopher that is a materialistic ? No, i am not materialistic , i am a philosopher that is seeking like a "balance" between being materialistic and not being materialistic , and i am pragmatic, i will give you an example so that you understand my philosophy: I think that looking at the videos of youtube is like being not materialistic, since a video on youtube is like the immaterial, so then you can enjoy those pleasures of life on internet by looking at the videos of youtube or by reading facebook etc. by being not materialistic, so then i am a philosopher that is convinced that we can be happy even if we are not "rich", since with the sophistication of internet and such tools, i say that we can be happy without being rich by accessing internet and enjoying pleasures of life of internet and such tools with a very low price, and what i predict that in about 10 years from now, and with the exponential progress of our humanity, we will be happy and much more happy without being rich since this exponential progress will provide us with much more powerful tools that enhance much more the quality of our lives. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: May 04 12:34PM -0700 Hello, More philosophy about wich philosophy is better? I invite you to read the following article: 'Happiness Tech' Is On the Rise. Is It Working? https://singularityhub.com/2018/09/02/happiness-tech-is-on-the-rise-is-it-working/ I have just smartly and rapidly read the above article, and i think that it is making a big mistake, since i think i am smart and notice that it is defining happiness as the following: "In this context, "happiness" refers to a general sense of well-being, gratitude, and inner peace." And i think it is not smart and it is immaturity of philosophy, and it is not understanding my philosophy that i think is a superior philosophy, so i think i am a smart philosopher and here is the basis of my philosophy: More philosophy about the strenght of philosophy.. I will ask a smart philosophical question: Is human life sad ? I think i am a philosopher and i will answer this question: When you are smart you will know that morality needs the right "balance", like a balance between competition and collaboration, or like a balance between individualism and collectivism, so human life is the same, it needs requirements so that to be pleasure of life, for example human life needs the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty and that brings pleasure, so i think human life has this kind of alternances that brings happiness and pleasures as an essence, for example when this Coronavirus crisis will be over, we will have learned how to appreciate more our kind of civilization or pleasures of life, so the sadness of Coronavirus crisis will soon bring happiness and pleasures of life when Coronavirus crisis will be over, so as you are noticing it is like the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty and pleasure, so you have to read my philosophy below about from where comes happiness and pleasures of life so that you understand that human life is not absurd and is not sad. More philosophy about the great movie called Cast Away.. I invite you to look at the following short video of a great movie called Cast Away: Academy Award®-winning filmmaker Robert Zemeckis and two-time Oscar winner Tom Hanks reunite to explore the blessings and heartache of fate and the survival of the human spirit. Tom Hanks gives one of the towering screen performances of all time as Chuck Noland, a FedEx systems engineer whose ruled-by-the-clock existence abruptly ends when a harrowing plane crash leaves him isolated on a remote island. As Chuck struggles to survive, he finds that his own personal journey has only just begun... Look here at the following short video of this great movie called Cast Away: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zZ3UYd1UxA I think you have to look or look again at this great movie, because when you are smart you will notice that the movie also learns you the way of my philosophy below, i mean that Chuck Noland in the video(that is Tom Hanks) is getting like more and more hungry for our kind of civilization by being isolated on a remote island and he is learning to understand the way of my philosophy below about from where comes happiness and pleasures of life, because by being isolated on a remote island he is also learning to appreciate our kind civilization and this is also from where comes happiness, so you have to be smart by reading my following thoughts of my philosophy about from where comes happiness and pleasures of life and by at the same time making the logical analogy with the great movie above that we call Cast Away: From where comes happiness and pleasures of life? It is like beauty of the alternance of the day and night, from this alternance of the day and night comes beauty and a kind of pleasure, so i think that happiness comes from this kind of alternance, i mean that for example you will get a great pleasure from eating a Moroccan Couscous Bidaoui(read about it below) when you are hungry, so from this alternance of being hungry and eating a Moroccan Couscous comes this great pleasure of life that gives happiness and that gives the meaning of life, so you have to know how to be this alternance , i mean when for example you work hard and after that you give yourself peace by taking a rest and you also give yourself a pleasure like eating a Moroccan Couscous Bidaoui, you will get a great pleasure, so you have to know how to be this alternance of being hard work and giving yourself peace by taking a rest, this is from where comes happiness and this is from where comes the meaning of human existence, read all my following philosophy to understand more: More of my philosophy about pleasures of life.. As you have noticed i have talked before about the meaning and purpose of life (read below my thoughts).. And here is more explanation of what i was saying about pleasures of life: 101 Simple Pleasures to Boost Happiness According to Gretchen Rubin, author of The Happiness Project and Happier at Home. "It's not life changes like a new house or a fancy car that make the most impact, but sometimes little things like the smell of an orange, that give the biggest happiness boost," says Rubin. Read more here: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/simple-pleasures_b_3038326 So as you have just noticed that my philosophy is a new philosophy that doesn't look like the others, and the architectural ideas of my philosophy are the following: There is an absolute and a relative way of measuring, so when we measure absolutely(i mean completely or totally) the meaning of human life, so like in the case of absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, we can say: "Absurdism arises out of the tension between our desire for order, meaning and happiness and, on the other hand, the indifferent natural universe's refusal to provide that", hence when we are measuring absolutely the meaning of life, we can say that human life is absurd, but the question in philosophy is: Is human life absurd? In my philosophy human life is not absurd, because i say that happiness comes from enjoying pleasures of life that we feel with our senses we humans, and i am also defining the human sense as the one that comes from the brain and from consciousness that gives pleasure, i mean that when you are "learning" by looking at a video on youtube it can give a pleasure inside your brain that comes from the brain and from consciousness, so when you are happiness by enjoying pleasures of life with your human senses, you are enjoying life and you are not thinking about the "absolute" meaning of human life, but the meaning of human life becomes "relative", and since it becomes this relativeness so human life becomes not absurd, since this enjoying pleasures of life with our human senses is "like" a powerful "drug" that permit to be happy and to not to be preoccupied with the absolute meaning of human life that is talking about the philosopher Albert Camus. More philosophy and psychology about how to appreciate pleasures of life.. I invite you to look at the following interesting video, becauseit is also like philosophy, so look at it carefully and my thoughts about it are below: The story of my life - From a dream to reality https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wFsYY71wyk I think that this swedish women is an artist and photographer that is locally smart in what she is doing, since she is like creating pleasures of life by showing us her videos of the beautiful Sweden's nature, but the weakness of what she is doing is that this swedish women is not a philosopher like me, so she is not understanding correctly, because she is thinking that happiness comes from those high quality pleasures of life of the so beautiful Sweden's nature that she is showing in her videos, but i think it is a mistake, since not all people have those "high" quality pleasures of life, so in my philosophy(read about it below) i am explaining that happiness comes not only from pleasures of life, but it also comes from the alternance of being "hungry" for taking a rest and taking a rest or from the alternance of being hungry and eating a delicious meal, so happiness comes from the difficulties of life that make us more hungry for or make us appreciate much more the pleasures of life, so they make us more happy, and i think this is the secret of life. More about my philosophy and about human existence.. I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, and now i will explain more my philosophy so that you understand it: Our era of globalization has been characterized by the democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of information, and from where do you think comes this progress ? i think it comes from the "exponential" progress of our humanity, and you have to understand this exponential progress of our humanity correctly by reading my below thoughts, other than that i think that those democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of information have like democratized happiness too, i mean that before those democratizations brought by the exponential progress of our humanity, Lower social class and lower middle class had to be rich to be able to be happy, because we were lacking technology and lacking tools that permit to be happy without being rich, so this is why humanity was much more violent because the not rich was violently fighting the rich etc. so we had violent ideologies like communism and nazism etc. but i think that today with the big advancement of technology and science etc. we are able to be happy without being rich, and read my below thoughts to understand how and to understand my philosophy about it, and read my following thoughts about democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of information so that you understand more: And look at the following video: Why Israel is a Tech Capital of the World https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuPx61911Oo I think that this jewish from Israel that is talking in the above video is not thinking correctly, because there is two important things that you must have so that a country be successful: Capital and talents, the above video is making a mistake by saying that you need the two so that to be successful, i mean it is saying that you need Capital and talents, but i think he is making a mistake, because i think that Capital can attract talents, so Capital can make you successful as a country, so then i can logically infer that so that to have capital that make you successful, you have to know how to construct a product or services that you can sell from those competitive advantages of competitive part or parts of product or service that can come from you or/and can come from different countries of the global world, and it is i think an efficient way that makes you adapt quickly and efficiently in this globalization, and notice with me that having competitive part or parts of a product or service doesn't mean it has to come from R&D(Research and development), also the above video of the jewish from Israel is not saying that Capital can come from "democratization" of finance, since you have to know that our global world has changed very much by being democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of information, read my following thoughts so that you also understand that Capital also comes from democratization of finance: More about "democratization" of finance.. This "democratization" of finance is also for Research and Development (R&D)).. And look at the following "democratization" of finance so that to understand: The 4 tools making capital more abundant than it's ever been Read more here: https://singularityhub.com/2018/07/19/the-4-tools-making-capital-more-abundant-than-its-ever-been/ About democratization of digital technology and technology and Research and Development (R&D) investment This is also why i said the following: Look at the following interesting video: Can South Korea lead global innovation in Fourth Industrial Era? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUw8gCShEcI But i think that this minister of education, science and technology of south Korea looks somewhat archaic since he is not taking correctly into account the democratization of digital technology and Technology that permits you to economically grow very rapidly and much cheaply than using "expensive" Research and Development (R&D) investment, so i think that he is not correctly adapting to the realities, because the economic realities have very much changed, since also our era of globalization has been characterized by the democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of information. Here is more proof of what i am saying: 2. Question: What do you mean by "Democratizing Innovation"? Eric von Hippel: The tools for designing high-quality innovations are getting so cheap and so ubiquitous that individuals can innovate for themselves at a steadily higher quality and at a steadily decreasing cost. These sophisticated modern tools are computer-based, and require relatively little training and practice. As a result, even hobbyist users find they can use them to design new products and services. Read more here: Democratizing Innovation: The Shift of Innovation to Users https://www.ideaconnection.com/interviews/00010-Democratizing-Innovation-The-Shift-of-Innovation.html Am i a philosopher that is a materialistic ? No, i am not materialistic , i am a philosopher that is seeking like a "balance" between being materialistic and not being materialistic , and i am pragmatic, i will give you an example so that you understand my philosophy: I think that looking at the videos of youtube is like being not materialistic, since a video on youtube is like the immaterial, so then you can enjoy those pleasures of life on internet by looking at the videos of youtube or by reading facebook etc. by being not materialistic, so then i am a philosopher that is convinced that we can be happy even if we are not "rich", since with the sophistication of internet and such tools, i say that we can be happy without being rich by accessing internet and enjoying pleasures of life of internet and such tools with a very low price, and what i predict that in about 10 years from now, and with the exponential progress of our humanity, we will be happy and much more happy without being rich since this exponential progress will provide us with much more powerful tools that enhance much more the quality of our lives. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: May 04 11:14AM -0700 Hello.. More philosophy about how to be a successful country.. I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I invite you to read the following article: The Secret Behind Silicon Valley's Enduring Success https://singularityhub.com/2012/07/12/the-real-secret-behind-silicon-valleys-success/ And i have just detected with my smartness the pattern in the above article, and it is that success of a country comes from: A good education system and from talents and from capital and from from attracting the smartest immigrants. But i think i am smart and i have to be fine-grained and show you more the important details, so read my following thoughts so that to understand: And look at the following video: Why Israel is a Tech Capital of the World https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuPx61911Oo I think that this jewish from Israel that is talking in the above video is not thinking correctly, because there is two important things that you must have so that a country be successful: Capital and talents, the above video is making a mistake by saying that you need the two so that to be successful, i mean it is saying that you need Capital and talents, but i think he is making a mistake, because i think that Capital can attract talents, so Capital can make you successful as a country, so then i can logically infer that so that to have capital that make you successful, you have to know how to construct a product or services that you can sell from those competitive advantages of competitive part or parts of product or service that can come from you or/and can come from different countries of the global world, and it is i think an efficient way that makes you adapt quickly and efficiently in this globalization, and notice with me that having competitive part or parts of a product or service doesn't mean it has to come from R&D(Research and development), also the above video of the jewish from Israel is not saying that Capital can come from "democratization" of finance, since you have to know that our global world has changed very much by being democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of information, read my following thoughts so that you also understand that Capital also comes from democratization of finance: More about "democratization" of finance.. This "democratization" of finance is also for Research and Development (R&D)).. And look at the following "democratization" of finance so that to understand: The 4 tools making capital more abundant than it's ever been Read more here: https://singularityhub.com/2018/07/19/the-4-tools-making-capital-more-abundant-than-its-ever-been/ About democratization of digital technology and technology and Research and Development (R&D) investment This is also why i said the following: Look at the following interesting video: Can South Korea lead global innovation in Fourth Industrial Era? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUw8gCShEcI But i think that this minister of education, science and technology of south Korea looks somewhat archaic since he is not taking correctly into account the democratization of digital technology and Technology that permits you to economically grow very rapidly and much cheaply than using "expensive" Research and Development (R&D) investment, so i think that he is not correctly adapting to the realities, because the economic realities have very much changed, since also our era of globalization has been characterized by the democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of information. Here is more proof of what i am saying: 2. Question: What do you mean by "Democratizing Innovation"? Eric von Hippel: The tools for designing high-quality innovations are getting so cheap and so ubiquitous that individuals can innovate for themselves at a steadily higher quality and at a steadily decreasing cost. These sophisticated modern tools are computer-based, and require relatively little training and practice. As a result, even hobbyist users find they can use them to design new products and services. Read more here: Democratizing Innovation: The Shift of Innovation to Users https://www.ideaconnection.com/interviews/00010-Democratizing-Innovation-The-Shift-of-Innovation.html I have just talked before about the importance of the following statement in business: "The focus should be on the product, since if the product is good the profits will follow" But notice that it is saying that if the product is good then the profits will follow, so as you are noticing we have to define what is a good product ? and does a good product only comes from science or from engineering? not at all !, since the product can become good by the process of creativity, and then we have to define creativity, and creativity needs globalization, since creativity and innovation come from ideas circulating and combining across nations and industries, and i invite you to read about what is creativity in the following interesting web page from Yale university: What Is Creativity? https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/what-is-creativity More philosophy about Canada and its education system.. I am living in Canada since year 1989, and i think Canada is the best country in the world, and here is the logical proof of it: Read the following about Canada to notice it: Canada is the No. 1 Country in the World, According to the 2021 Best Countries Report https://www.usnews.com/info/blogs/press-room/articles/2021-04-13/canada-is-the-no-1-country-in-the-world-according-to-2021-best-countries And the education system of Canada is one of the best in the world, read the following to notice it: How Canada became an education superpower https://www.bbc.com/news/business-40708421 And to know more about USA, read my following writing: More philosophy about USA and its education system.. I invite you to look carefully at this 9 minutes video of Michio Kaku an American theoretical physicist, and he explains something really important to know about USA: Michio Kaku: US has the worst educational system known to science https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fphPeRvhjQ Here is more proof, read my following writing about USA: Let's look for example at USA, so read the following from Jonathan Wai that is a Ph.D., it says: "Heiner Rindermann and James Thompson uncovered that the "smart fraction" of a country is quite influential in impacting the performance of that country, for example, its GDP." And it also says the following: ""According to recent population estimates, there are about eight Chinese and Indians for every American in the top 1 percent in brains." But consider that the U.S. benefits from the smart fractions of every other country in the world because it continues to serve as a magnet for brainpower, something that is not even factored into these rankings. What these rankings clearly show is America is likely still in the lead in terms of brainpower. And this is despite the fact federal funding for educating our smart fraction is currently zero. Everyone seems worried Americans are falling behind, but this is because everyone is focusing on average and below average people. Maybe it's time we started taking a closer look at the smartest people of our own country." Read more here: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/finding-the-next-einstein/201312/whats-the-smartest-country-in-the-world So as you are noticing it's immigrants(and there are about eight Chinese and Indians for every American in the top 1 percent in brains) that are making USA a rich country. And read also the following to understand more: Why Silicon Valley Wouldn't Work Without Immigrants There are many theories for why immigrants find so much success in tech. Many American-born tech workers point out that there is no shortage of American-born employees to fill the roles at many tech companies. Researchers have found that more than enough students graduate from American colleges to fill available tech jobs. Critics of the industry's friendliness toward immigrants say it comes down to money — that technology companies take advantage of visa programs, like the H-1B system, to get foreign workers at lower prices than they would pay American-born ones. But if that criticism rings true in some parts of the tech industry, it misses the picture among Silicon Valley's top companies. One common misperception of Silicon Valley is that it operates like a factory; in that view, tech companies can hire just about anyone from anywhere in the world to fill a particular role. But today's most ambitious tech companies are not like factories. They're more like athletic teams. They're looking for the LeBrons and Bradys — the best people in the world to come up with some brand-new, never-before-seen widget, to completely reimagine what widgets should do in the first place. "It's not about adding tens or hundreds of thousands of people into manufacturing plants," said Aaron Levie, the co-founder and chief executive of the cloud-storage company Box. "It's about the couple ideas that are going to be invented that are going to change everything." Why do tech honchos believe that immigrants are better at coming up with those inventions? It's partly a numbers thing. As the tech venture capitalist Paul Graham has pointed out, the United States has only 5 percent of the world's population; it stands to reason that most of the world's best new ideas will be thought up by people who weren't born here. If you look at some of the most consequential ideas in tech, you find an unusual number that were developed by immigrants. For instance, Google's entire advertising business — that is, the basis for the vast majority of its revenues and profits, the engine that allows it to hire thousands of people in the United States — was created by three immigrants: Salar Kamangar and Omid Kordestani, who came to the United States from Iran, and Eric Veach, from Canada. But it's not just a numbers thing. Another reason immigrants do so well in tech is that people from outside bring new perspectives that lead to new ideas. Read more here: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/08/technology/personaltech/why-silicon-valley-wouldnt-work-without-immigrants.html Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: May 04 08:12AM -0700 Hello, Yet more philosophy about the smart patterns and about abstraction.. So i will give you a smart question that is like a Mensa IQ test, here it is: What is the important relation between the exponential progress of our humanity and abstraction and the smart patterns and functional programming ? So you are noticing that you have to be smart so that to answer correctly this question, and answering this question is really important, also i can logically infer from the answer of the above question that i can invent a new proverb from it, so here is my new proverb in french and english about it: "The intelligent favors healthy eating over tasty eating, and by analogy we can also say that the intelligent also favors the effective speaker over the sweet talker" "L'intelligent privilégie le manger santé au manger qui a du goût, et par analogie on peut aussi dire que l'intelligent aussi privilégie le parleur efficace au beau parleur." Here is my other just new proverb that will help you to understand what i want you to understand, and it is like a Mensa IQ test: "Is understanding the patterns of functional programming and all understanding of functional programming? so then the intelligent will also pedagogically follow the same way of effectively learning functional programming from the patterns of functional programming, so it is also an effective abstraction and it is an effective top-down methodology, and it permits you to be really efficient, and i am doing it smartly, since i am finding with my smartness more of those patterns or smart patterns that permit this effectiveness " I am rapidly inventing and thinking and writing my following proverbs: Here is my just new proverb: "Even silence makes us advance, since a human life full of silence is not the right diversity as a balance that makes the good reliance" Here is my other just new proverb in english and french: "Learn to lift your head with dignity because even the sea has threatening waves." "Apprends à élever la tête avec dignité car même la mer a des vagues qui menacent." And here is my other new proverbs read them carefully: https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/w7wgcbkEEIQ More philosophy about our Era and about the democratization process and more.. I have just written the following: -- I invite you to look at the following interesting video: Future AI will REVOLUTIONIZE games https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nx8RPnrP9W0 -- So as you are noticing by looking at the above video that games development will soon be democratized with AI, so look at the above video carefully to notice it, and read my following thoughts of my philosophy that talks about our Era that is characterized by democratization of technology and democratization of information and democratization of finance: I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. Yet more philosophy about what you see is not what you see and more.. So i can say to humans the following: "What you see is not what you see" So we have to "decompose", so the first "what you see" in the sentence above is the "reality" that you see, and the second "what you see" is both how you see with your eyes "and" how you see with your thinking the reality, so then i have just made you understand that most of humans are using linear thinking and not exponential thinking that understand the exponential progress of our humanity and that understand the law of accelerating returns, and this linear thinking is not correct thinking, so this linear thinking makes our thinking of the reality not correct, so we can then logically say to humans: "What you see is not what you see." Look at the following video to understand more the way of exponential thinking: Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ&t=144s More philosophy about the human existence.. I also invite you to read my following philosophy in my following beautiful webpage about human existence: https://scalable68.godaddysites.com/f/my-philosophy-about-human-existence More philosophy about education and the forms of human communication.. I think that our societies are experiencing many changes, among the many changes is that we are using multimedia way of communicating like youtube, but if you notice carefully this way of such youtube way is a form of human communication that looks like an oral tradition that lacks good and precise thinking and precise writing, so i think that we have to be careful since i think that we have to "master" more the way of good and precise thinking and precise writing so that to adapt correctly and efficiently, so there is a "distinction" to be made about the form of human communication, since i think that the form of good and precise thinking and precise writing by also using hypertext and hyperlinks is the way to go. So notice below how i am thinking and writing my philosophy with a much more efficient way of doing since it is technical and it is a much more efficient and precise way of thinking and writing. This is why i have also just said the following: More of my philosophy about the hyperlink and hypertext revolution and the web.. I think the best things that have happened to internet is the exponential growth of data and information on internet(and it is good for artificial intelligence) and the how it is organized efficiently, i mean this hypertext and hyperlink way of organizing information on internet is "so" powerful and i think it is what have revolutionized internet, here is the definition of hyperlink: "A hyperlink is a word, phrase, or image that you can click on to jump to a new document or a new section within the current document. Hyperlinks are found in nearly all Web pages, allowing users to click their way from page to page." So this is why you have to be optimistic since i am also organizing my thoughts of my philosophy and political philosophy more efficiently in an hyperlink way too, but i will organize them much more efficiently as a pdf and html book and you will be able to download them from my website. So i am very optimistic about our world, since our humanity is progressing in an exponential way, and data and information in internet is growing in an exponential way, and our era of globalization has been characterized by the democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of information, and economies of scale resulted in the most affordable price of any product for the consumer without the manufacturer having to sacrifice profits(and this economies of scale needs globalization too) etc., so i think our world is becoming much more powerful and efficient. More of my philosophy about creativity and innovation.. I have just talked before about the importance of the following statement in business: "The focus should be on the product, since if the product is good the profits will follow" But notice that it is saying that if the product is good then the profits will follow, so as you are noticing we have to define what is a good product ? and does a good product only comes from science or from engineering? not at all !, since the product can become good by the process of creativity, and then we have to define creativity, and creativity needs globalization, since creativity and innovation come from ideas circulating and combining across nations and industries, and i invite you to read about what is creativity in the following interesting web page from Yale university: What Is Creativity? https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/what-is-creativity And read all my following thoughts about my philosophy as a philosopher: More philosophy about the german philosopher Martin Heidegger.. I invite you to read the following article about the german philosopher Martin Heidegger: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2009/jun/05/heidegger-philosophy I am a philosopher and i think that the german philosopher Martin Heidegger is an inferior philosopher, so i invite you to read all my following thoughts of my philosophy since i think that my philosophy is superior to other philosophies of other philosophers: More of my philosophy about the philosopher and economist Adam Smith and more.. Are Robots Coming for Our Jobs? Careful, It's a Trick Question https://singularityhub.com/2019/07/22/will-robots-take-our-jobs-careful-its-a-trick-question/ And notice that it says the following: "...Economic disparities have become more pronounced, with those at the top of corporate ladders raking in the money while much of the workforce sees no difference in earnings. These disparities (along with the technologies themselves) have fed into political polarization and helped fuel a rise in identity politics, nationalism, and the election of strongmen." But i think my following philosophy gives a solution to the above problem, so i invite you to read all my following thoughts of my philosophy to notice it: More of my philosophy about egoism and competition and collaboration and cooperation.. I invite you to look at the following video: Why is Communism So Appealing? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_0UAsaqaOc I am not a communist, my political philosophy is different, and i think my philosophy is better, and i am explaining it in my below thoughts, i think that the philosophy of the philosopher and economist Adam Smith was lacking on efficiency, since he said that "Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations" and i think it is not true, simply because creativity and innovation come not only from competition and its egoism, but they also come from ideas circulating and combining across nations and industries(so they need globalization), but egoism of competition is too much extremism that hurts because it has also the tendency to make ideas not circulating and combining efficiently across nations and industries, so my philosophy says that we have to seek like a balance between competition and collaboration or cooperation, and this needs also collaboration and cooperation by sharing ideas and sharing knowledge and sharing PhD papers and sharing open source softwares etc. and here is my new philosophy and model, read it carefully in my following thoughts: More philosophy about the Scottish and economist and philosopher called Adam Smith.. I invite you to look at the following video about Adam Smith: ADAM SMITH - La main invisible https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIvtWvDkkVk You can read about Adam Smith here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Smith I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, and i say that the philosopher and economist Adam Smith was not right by saying the following(you can listen to it in the above video): "Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations" I think that Adam Smith is not right by saying so, since my new philosophy and model says that you have to seek like a balance between collaboration or cooperation and competition(and egoism comes from competition), my philosophy says that innovation and creativity not only come from competition but it also come from ideas circulating and combining across nations and industries(so they need globalization), so in my philosophy creativity and innovation needs also collaboration and cooperation by sharing ideas and sharing knowledge and sharing PhD papers and sharing open source softwares etc. and here is my new philosophy and model: My today talk is about white supremacism and neo-nazism and the far-right and nationalism. So the first philosophical question is how to talk about those above ideologies? I think that it is also like a Mensa IQ test, so since i think i am smart, i have to use my smartness to solve the Mensa IQ test, so when you are smart, so how can you solve the problem(that is like a Mensa IQ test) of those above ideologies ? i think that i have first to detect the important pattern with my fluid intelligence, and i have to see clearly the pattern(like for example getting into the details from the abstraction of the pattern), and the important pattern is the following: Notice that it is like an optimization problem of artificial intelligence that looks like PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), it is what we call Swarm intelligence, and in PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) there is what we call local optimization that we call exploitation, and there is what we call global optimization that we call exploration(read about PSO in my thoughts below so that to understand), so if PSO is not balanced correctly with exploitation and exploration it can not converge to the global optimum, we say that PSO has to guarantee the optimal convergence, so if it is not correctly balanced with both exploitation and exploration it can get stuck in a local maximum and not to converge to global optimum, so then notice that with logical analogy, exploration and exploitation of PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) is in philosophy like seeking the right balance between individualism and collectivism that guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, or it is like seeking the right balance between collaboration and competition that guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, so then since the above ideologies are nationalism and nationalism is too much local optimization and lack of global optimization , it is too much competition and lack of collaboration or cooperation, so it is by logical analogy like too much exploitation and lack of exploration in PSO, so this is not good and here is how to notice it , read the following: Read the following article about economic nationalism: Rise of Economic Nationalism and Its Implications https://www.lewisu.edu/experts/wordpress/index.php/rise-of-economic-nationalism-and-its-implications/ Notice that it says the following: "Countries benefit with cooperation between countries to mutual benefit, becoming too nationalistic at the expense of its partners is counterproductive. It is an approach that creates conflict. Being more nationalistic tends to be a zero sum game in an increasingly interdependent world economy, where countries depend on other countries for their economic and political and national security well being. When companies cooperate, they can become more competitive. When they are more competitive, they hire more workers, pay higher salaries, and otherwise contribute to economic growth. Economic nationalism is a bad policy." So a you are noticing that nationalism is not the right way to do. This is why i also said the following: More political philosophy about globalization and nationalism.. I am a white arab and i think i am more smart, so today i will talk about a very important subject about Globalization and nationalism, so i will invite you to look at the following video of Marine Le Pen of the far-right political party in France: Marine Le Pen explains why nationalism is important https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNpI9wKnE8Q As you notice that Marine Le Pen is saying in french that the fight today is between nationalism and globalization, since Marine Le Pen says that globalization is a treat to national identity and is a treat to national sovereignty, but i think that Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly globalization, since i think that nationalism is too much competition and communism and socialism is too much collaboration , so i think the best way is to seek like a balance between collaboration and competition and when we look at globalization you will notice that we are collaborating with others by for example sharing Open Source softwares or |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: May 04 07:58AM -0700 Hello, More philosophy about the smart patterns and about abstraction.. So i will give you a smart question that is like a Mensa IQ test, here it is: What is the important relation between the exponential progress of our humanity and abstraction and the smart patterns and functional programming ? So you are noticing that you have to be smart so that to answer correctly this question, and answering this question is really important, also i can logically infer from the answer of the above question that i can invent a new proverb from it, so here is my new proverb in french and english about it: "The intelligent favors healthy eating over tasty eating, and by analogy we can also say that the intelligent also favors the effective speaker over the sweet talker" "L'intelligent privilégie le manger santé au manger qui a du goût, et par analogie on peut aussi dire que l'intelligent aussi privilégie le parleur efficace au beau parleur." Here is my other just new proverb that will help you to understand what i want you to understand, and it is like a Mensa IQ test: "Is understanding the patterns of functional programming and all understanding of functional programming? so then the intelligent will pedagogically follow the same way of effectively learning functional programming from the patterns of functional programming, so it is also an effective abstraction and it is an effective top-down methodology, and it permits you to be really efficient, and i am doing it smartly, since i am finding with my smartness more of those patterns or smart patterns that permit this effectiveness " I am rapidly inventing and thinking and writing my following proverbs: Here is my just new proverb: "Even silence makes us advance, since a human life full of silence is not the right diversity as a balance that makes the good reliance" Here is my other just new proverb in english and french: "Learn to lift your head with dignity because even the sea has threatening waves." "Apprends à élever la tête avec dignité car même la mer a des vagues qui menacent." And here is my other new proverbs read them carefully: https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/w7wgcbkEEIQ More philosophy about our Era and about the democratization process and more.. I have just written the following: -- I invite you to look at the following interesting video: Future AI will REVOLUTIONIZE games https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nx8RPnrP9W0 -- So as you are noticing by looking at the above video that games development will soon be democratized with AI, so look at the above video carefully to notice it, and read my following thoughts of my philosophy that talks about our Era that is characterized by democratization of technology and democratization of information and democratization of finance: I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. Yet more philosophy about what you see is not what you see and more.. So i can say to humans the following: "What you see is not what you see" So we have to "decompose", so the first "what you see" in the sentence above is the "reality" that you see, and the second "what you see" is both how you see with your eyes "and" how you see with your thinking the reality, so then i have just made you understand that most of humans are using linear thinking and not exponential thinking that understand the exponential progress of our humanity and that understand the law of accelerating returns, and this linear thinking is not correct thinking, so this linear thinking makes our thinking of the reality not correct, so we can then logically say to humans: "What you see is not what you see." Look at the following video to understand more the way of exponential thinking: Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ&t=144s More philosophy about the human existence.. I also invite you to read my following philosophy in my following beautiful webpage about human existence: https://scalable68.godaddysites.com/f/my-philosophy-about-human-existence More philosophy about education and the forms of human communication.. I think that our societies are experiencing many changes, among the many changes is that we are using multimedia way of communicating like youtube, but if you notice carefully this way of such youtube way is a form of human communication that looks like an oral tradition that lacks good and precise thinking and precise writing, so i think that we have to be careful since i think that we have to "master" more the way of good and precise thinking and precise writing so that to adapt correctly and efficiently, so there is a "distinction" to be made about the form of human communication, since i think that the form of good and precise thinking and precise writing by also using hypertext and hyperlinks is the way to go. So notice below how i am thinking and writing my philosophy with a much more efficient way of doing since it is technical and it is a much more efficient and precise way of thinking and writing. This is why i have also just said the following: More of my philosophy about the hyperlink and hypertext revolution and the web.. I think the best things that have happened to internet is the exponential growth of data and information on internet(and it is good for artificial intelligence) and the how it is organized efficiently, i mean this hypertext and hyperlink way of organizing information on internet is "so" powerful and i think it is what have revolutionized internet, here is the definition of hyperlink: "A hyperlink is a word, phrase, or image that you can click on to jump to a new document or a new section within the current document. Hyperlinks are found in nearly all Web pages, allowing users to click their way from page to page." So this is why you have to be optimistic since i am also organizing my thoughts of my philosophy and political philosophy more efficiently in an hyperlink way too, but i will organize them much more efficiently as a pdf and html book and you will be able to download them from my website. So i am very optimistic about our world, since our humanity is progressing in an exponential way, and data and information in internet is growing in an exponential way, and our era of globalization has been characterized by the democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of information, and economies of scale resulted in the most affordable price of any product for the consumer without the manufacturer having to sacrifice profits(and this economies of scale needs globalization too) etc., so i think our world is becoming much more powerful and efficient. More of my philosophy about creativity and innovation.. I have just talked before about the importance of the following statement in business: "The focus should be on the product, since if the product is good the profits will follow" But notice that it is saying that if the product is good then the profits will follow, so as you are noticing we have to define what is a good product ? and does a good product only comes from science or from engineering? not at all !, since the product can become good by the process of creativity, and then we have to define creativity, and creativity needs globalization, since creativity and innovation come from ideas circulating and combining across nations and industries, and i invite you to read about what is creativity in the following interesting web page from Yale university: What Is Creativity? https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/what-is-creativity And read all my following thoughts about my philosophy as a philosopher: More philosophy about the german philosopher Martin Heidegger.. I invite you to read the following article about the german philosopher Martin Heidegger: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2009/jun/05/heidegger-philosophy I am a philosopher and i think that the german philosopher Martin Heidegger is an inferior philosopher, so i invite you to read all my following thoughts of my philosophy since i think that my philosophy is superior to other philosophies of other philosophers: More of my philosophy about the philosopher and economist Adam Smith and more.. Are Robots Coming for Our Jobs? Careful, It's a Trick Question https://singularityhub.com/2019/07/22/will-robots-take-our-jobs-careful-its-a-trick-question/ And notice that it says the following: "...Economic disparities have become more pronounced, with those at the top of corporate ladders raking in the money while much of the workforce sees no difference in earnings. These disparities (along with the technologies themselves) have fed into political polarization and helped fuel a rise in identity politics, nationalism, and the election of strongmen." But i think my following philosophy gives a solution to the above problem, so i invite you to read all my following thoughts of my philosophy to notice it: More of my philosophy about egoism and competition and collaboration and cooperation.. I invite you to look at the following video: Why is Communism So Appealing? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_0UAsaqaOc I am not a communist, my political philosophy is different, and i think my philosophy is better, and i am explaining it in my below thoughts, i think that the philosophy of the philosopher and economist Adam Smith was lacking on efficiency, since he said that "Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations" and i think it is not true, simply because creativity and innovation come not only from competition and its egoism, but they also come from ideas circulating and combining across nations and industries(so they need globalization), but egoism of competition is too much extremism that hurts because it has also the tendency to make ideas not circulating and combining efficiently across nations and industries, so my philosophy says that we have to seek like a balance between competition and collaboration or cooperation, and this needs also collaboration and cooperation by sharing ideas and sharing knowledge and sharing PhD papers and sharing open source softwares etc. and here is my new philosophy and model, read it carefully in my following thoughts: More philosophy about the Scottish and economist and philosopher called Adam Smith.. I invite you to look at the following video about Adam Smith: ADAM SMITH - La main invisible https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIvtWvDkkVk You can read about Adam Smith here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Smith I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, and i say that the philosopher and economist Adam Smith was not right by saying the following(you can listen to it in the above video): "Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations" I think that Adam Smith is not right by saying so, since my new philosophy and model says that you have to seek like a balance between collaboration or cooperation and competition(and egoism comes from competition), my philosophy says that innovation and creativity not only come from competition but it also come from ideas circulating and combining across nations and industries(so they need globalization), so in my philosophy creativity and innovation needs also collaboration and cooperation by sharing ideas and sharing knowledge and sharing PhD papers and sharing open source softwares etc. and here is my new philosophy and model: My today talk is about white supremacism and neo-nazism and the far-right and nationalism. So the first philosophical question is how to talk about those above ideologies? I think that it is also like a Mensa IQ test, so since i think i am smart, i have to use my smartness to solve the Mensa IQ test, so when you are smart, so how can you solve the problem(that is like a Mensa IQ test) of those above ideologies ? i think that i have first to detect the important pattern with my fluid intelligence, and i have to see clearly the pattern(like for example getting into the details from the abstraction of the pattern), and the important pattern is the following: Notice that it is like an optimization problem of artificial intelligence that looks like PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), it is what we call Swarm intelligence, and in PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) there is what we call local optimization that we call exploitation, and there is what we call global optimization that we call exploration(read about PSO in my thoughts below so that to understand), so if PSO is not balanced correctly with exploitation and exploration it can not converge to the global optimum, we say that PSO has to guarantee the optimal convergence, so if it is not correctly balanced with both exploitation and exploration it can get stuck in a local maximum and not to converge to global optimum, so then notice that with logical analogy, exploration and exploitation of PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) is in philosophy like seeking the right balance between individualism and collectivism that guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, or it is like seeking the right balance between collaboration and competition that guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, so then since the above ideologies are nationalism and nationalism is too much local optimization and lack of global optimization , it is too much competition and lack of collaboration or cooperation, so it is by logical analogy like too much exploitation and lack of exploration in PSO, so this is not good and here is how to notice it , read the following: Read the following article about economic nationalism: Rise of Economic Nationalism and Its Implications https://www.lewisu.edu/experts/wordpress/index.php/rise-of-economic-nationalism-and-its-implications/ Notice that it says the following: "Countries benefit with cooperation between countries to mutual benefit, becoming too nationalistic at the expense of its partners is counterproductive. It is an approach that creates conflict. Being more nationalistic tends to be a zero sum game in an increasingly interdependent world economy, where countries depend on other countries for their economic and political and national security well being. When companies cooperate, they can become more competitive. When they are more competitive, they hire more workers, pay higher salaries, and otherwise contribute to economic growth. Economic nationalism is a bad policy." So a you are noticing that nationalism is not the right way to do. This is why i also said the following: More political philosophy about globalization and nationalism.. I am a white arab and i think i am more smart, so today i will talk about a very important subject about Globalization and nationalism, so i will invite you to look at the following video of Marine Le Pen of the far-right political party in France: Marine Le Pen explains why nationalism is important https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNpI9wKnE8Q As you notice that Marine Le Pen is saying in french that the fight today is between nationalism and globalization, since Marine Le Pen says that globalization is a treat to national identity and is a treat to national sovereignty, but i think that Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly globalization, since i think that nationalism is too much competition and communism and socialism is too much collaboration , so i think the best way is to seek like a balance between collaboration and competition and when we look at globalization you will notice that we are collaborating with others by for example sharing Open Source softwares or Free |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment