Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 29 04:50PM -0700
Hello,
More of my philosophy about what is the best engine that makes a society a society..
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
I think i am a smart philosopher, and i think that the best engine
that makes a society a society is the following, look at my following proverb and you will notice, i think it is a game like in a Love
relationship of action and reward of Love, so the best actions
are rewarded the best and makes the best societies, so then making the people much more wise or wise is really important, so read my following thoughts so that to notice the powerful engine:
More of my philosophy about universal Love and beauty..
I think i am smart, and i think i am a wise type of person,
Now i can ask the following philosophical questions:
Does Love is subjective ?
Does Beauty is subjective ?
Here is my answer:
I think i am smart, and i will say that you have to know how to measure
it, so you have to know how to "prioritize" by weights of importance,
i mean that that so that to know about beauty, there is two ways of
doing it, first there is the inferior way of doing it by looking at beauty superficially , and it becomes an a not exact appearance and a not so good measure, and there is the second way that is like scientific
and it is to measure beauty with our smartness, by prioritizing and say that the smartests and wise persons among us have to measure
beauty and Love and know if we can calling them beauty and Love and if
we can accept them as beauty and Love, so then by measuring it this way with smartness and wisdom we can then say that Love and beauty don't become subjective, and as you have just noticed yesterday i said that Love looks like artificial intelligence, since it needs an action that merits a reward (as Love), and you can know more about it by reading my following new proverb:
Here is my new proverb:
"We can ask of from where comes the attachment of Love between
a mother and her son ? so i think i am smart and i will say
that it comes from the fact that it is like a reward, that the son
is loving or is being the son and the mother is giving a good reward like giving him more security or giving him food to eat, so as you are noticing that this rule can be applied to consumerism, since
you can use the same rule with your consumers in a smart
way, for example by giving the impression to your consumers that
you take care of there security by learning them with easy or the like, and then the consumers will love you much more and will be attracted by you."
So then we can say much more precisely that Love needs an action and
its reward (as Love), but there is individual love that is like a process of local optimization and there is universal Love that is a process of global optimization in a society that also can comes with a "margin" that makes us also be a level of tolerance on this or that action. And notice with me that it looks like the optimization of particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial intelligence, since the local local optimization PSO is like the process of individual Love, and the global optimization of PSO is like the process of the global Love in a society, and of course particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial intelligence is like Reinforcement Learning in AI(artificial intelligence), since in PSO in artificial intelligence we have the actions of the members of the population of PSO that searches for the optimal value that are found that are then rewarded by making them the
values that optimizes further and further towards the global optimum.
And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44
More of my philosophy about nationalism and about white supremacism..
'
I think i am smart and i think that racial or ethnical nationalism
is an inferior ideology, the racial or ethnic nationalism is based on the idea that we are ethnical groups or racial groups of whites
or blacks or arabs or asians and the like, but it is an inferior conception, since also we can notice that the difference between the individuals of an ethnic group or racial group looks like the difference between ethnic groups or racial groups, so when you look at it from more and more details you will notice that ethnic nationalism is
much more a construction of the imagination of humans rather than a real thing, since for example i can say to you to look at the racial white european group, are they individually the same ? not at all since every individual in the racial european group is different
than the other, and the difference is really noticeable, so i think that racial or ethnic nationalism is only much more a construction of human imagination than a real thing, so then the engine that is being ethnic or racial nationalism is a much more weak engine that doesn't work efficiently.
And about extremist ideologies like white supremacism, i invite you to read my following thoughts about them:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ
More of philosophy about Democracy and the Evolutionary Design methodology..
I will make a logical analogy between software projects and Democracy,
first i will say that because of the today big complexity of software projects, so the "requirements" of those complex software projects are not clear and a lot could change in them, so this is
why we are using an Evolutionary Design methodology with different tools
such as Unit Testing, Test Driven Development, Design Patterns, Continuous Integration, Domain Driven Design, but we have to notice carefully that an important thing in Evolutionary Design methodology is that when those complex software projects grow, we have first to normalize there growth by ensuring that the complex software projects grow "nicely" and "balanced" by using standards, and second we have to optimize growth of the complex software projects by balancing between the criteria of the easy to change the complex software projects and the performance of the complex software projects, and third you have to maximize the growth of the complex software projects by making the most out of each optimization, and i think that by logical analogy we can notice that in Democracy we have also to normalize the growth by not allowing "extremism" or extremist ideologies that hurt Democracy, and we have also to optimize Democracy by for example well balancing between "performance" of the society and in the Democracy and the "reliability" of helping others like the weakest members of the society among the people that of course respect the laws, and so that to understand more my thoughts of my philosophy about Democracy, i invite you to read them here:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vlDWhmf-MIM
And about extremist ideologies like white supremacism, i invite you to read my following thoughts about them:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ
More of my philosophy about entropy and about how morality is universal..
I think i am smart, and i am explaining below why morality is universal,
but as you have just noticed i have just said that so that to say
that morality is universal, it requires from us to know about the requirements such as why to be a global world etc., so there must be a level of consciousness, other than that i will make you feel and see much more that morality is universal since i am seeing it:
So take for example the human imperfections or world imperfections,
i say that it is because we have those imperfections that also we have morality, and those imperfections causes entropy(A state of disorder and disorganization), this is why we have to be more and more perfection so that to maintain order and so that to attain perfection of being much more perfect or perfect, for example humans are working in there everyday life so that to also maintain order or so that to become perfection or much more perfection, and maintaining order is also that we are perfectioning so that to not to become disorder.
More of my philosophy about why morality is universal..
I think i am a smart philosopher, and i will now explain why
morality is universal:
So take a look at the thing that we call "time", so you can naively look at our everyday life and say that time is not relative, but
you can like Einstein analyse it and prove that time is relative,
and morality is the same, so when you naively look at it you will
think that morality is relative, since you can notice that for example there is many countries with many laws and rules, but when you analyse it you will notice that the goal of morality that we become perfect or much more perfect pushes us forward towards more and more perfection since we have to solve our problems such as our many imperfections, it is also why morality is "progressive", so then the essence of morality become that morality is progressing towards the goal that is that we become perfect or much more perfect, so then the other details of morality are abstracted, so then those acts of humans perfectioning or perfecting towards a much more perfect world or perfect world and that are also codified as morality become that morality is universal, since also we can take this essence of morality as the most important thing.
More of my philosophy about the superhuman of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche..
I think i am smart philosopher, and i will be more precise in my logical proof of why the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche believed, like the philosopher Spinoza, that morality is not universal, so notice carefully
how the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche has wanted to construct a new type of man that is a superhuman in his view and this superhuman in the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a superhuman that has mastery over his emotions and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply existing, so as you are noticing that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is an inferior philosopher since he wanted to apply the morality of the strong to the morality of the weak in not wise manner, also you can
notice it more by him saying the following and recognizing that
there is different types of morals, and here is his saying:
"It is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the
slaves or the weak."
That means in french:
"C'est la volonté de puissance qui doit s'exprimer, non
pas la morale des esclaves ou des faibles.",
So the above saying of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is a proof
that he recognized that there is different kinds of morals like the morals of the slaves or the weak and morals of the strong humans or the strong. Read more my following thoughts about it and about Stoicism and existentialism and about how i am explaining that the essence of morality is universal:
More of my philosophy about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and more..
I have just looked at the following video about:
NIETZSCHE - L'exaltation de la vie
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeVVtxlg_oE
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that the
philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not good, since
he says that: "C'est la volonté de puissance qui doit s'exprimer, non
pas la morale des esclaves ou des faibles.", that means in english: "It
is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the
slaves or the weak.", and he said that it needs to construct a new man
that we call the superhuman, but I think that i am a philosopher that is
smart and i am understanding the philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich
Nietzsche, and i think that it is an inferior philosophy, because it
seeks to construct the superhumans from humans and this superhuman in
the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a superhuman that has mastery
over his emotions and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply
existing, so as you are noticing that it is an inferior philosophy,
because how can you be able to take joy in simply existing ? so as you
are noticing it is illogical and it is as illogical as Stoicism(read my
below thoughts about Stoicism) and i think that it is a violent
philosophy as Stoicism, this is why the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsch
is a failure as Stoicism, and here is what i said about Stoicism:
More of my philosophy about my philosophy and about Stoicism and
Existentialism..
I invite you to read this very interesting article about philosophy:
Why philosophers could be the ones to transform your 2020
https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20200114-why-philosophers-could-be-the-ones-to-transform-your-2020
And notice that it says the following:
"The Stoics suggest that what's most important in order to lead a good
life is internal rather than external. It's about developing the right
character, the right state of mind,"
I think i am a philosopher that is "smart", so i make you notice the
logical bug in the above saying about Stoicism, and it is that
developing the right character and the right state of the mind in
Stoicism needs the cultural side that also comes from the external
reality and hence from the "purpose" and the "meaning of life", and we
can notice that Stoicism is not so smart, because how can we develop
self-control and fortitude as a means of overcoming destructive emotions
and such without the necessary requirements that have to give enough
hope or a meaning of life that gives the necessary self-control and
fortitude? so this is why i think that Stoicism as a philosophy is a
failure, so what's about existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul
Sartre ? Jean-Paul Sartre said that: "Existence precedes essence" or in
french: "L'existence précède l'essence", and it is the central claim of
existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, but i think that
this claim is not so logical, since it is like a debate that asks the
question of: Wich is more important, the genetical side or cultural
side?, and we have to notice that the essence or nature of a human is
"not" enough and it needs for example a meaning of human life and a
purpose etc. so then notice that existentialism of Jean-Paul Sartre, and
like in absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, says that human life
is absurd, but here again my new philosophy says that human life is not
absurd, and read it below.
My philosophy about the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre and more..
I invite you to look at the following video about philosophy:
SARTRE - Le regard des autres
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJIM41TnDHI
I have just noticed by looking at the above video, that it is lacking,
since first you have to understand the following:
Jean-Paul Sartre said that: "Existence precedes essence" or in french:
"L'existence précède l'essence", and it is the central claim of
existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre.
But i think people are not understanding the philosopher Jean-Paul
Sartre, since the functionality of our essence is also our genetics that
predetermines to a certain level what is our existence, so the essence
that is our genetics is also important, but since the philosopher
Jean-Paul Sartre was a communist, he has wanted to give much more "hope"
by saying: "Existence precedes essence", and i think this also means that
humans are by essence free, and this also means that the human nurture
is much more important than the human nature, but it is not truth, so i
think that Jean-Paul Sartre has made a big error by saying so. And
Jean-Paul Sartre has also accepted the views of the philosopher Albert
Camus about the absurdism of existence, but i am a philosopher and here
again i am not in accordance with it, since i say that human existence is not absurd, and read my below thoughts to |
