- Read again, i correct about more of my philosophy about why morality is universal.. - 2 Updates
- More of my philosophy about monotheistic religions and about economic Liberalism and capitalism and more.. - 1 Update
- More of my philosophy about why morality is universal.. - 1 Update
- Where are all the others ? - 1 Update
- Amine, take time and - 1 Update
- More of my philosophy about the superhuman of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche.. - 1 Update
- More of my philosophy about the logical proof that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche thought that morality is not universal.. - 1 Update
- Read again, i correct about more of my philosophy about the ideas of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer and more.. - 1 Update
- More of my philosophy about the ideas of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer and more.. - 1 Update
- More of my philosophy about universal Love and beauty.. - 1 Update
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 28 06:19PM -0700 Hello, Read again, i correct about more of my philosophy about why morality is universal.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I think i am a smart philosopher, and i will now explain why morality is universal: So take a look at the thing that we call "time", so you can naively look at our everyday life and say that time is not relative, but you can like Einstein analyse it and prove that time is relative, and morality is the same, so when you naively look at it you will think that morality is relative, since you can notice that for example there is many countries with many laws and rules, but when you analyse it you will notice that the goal of morality that we become perfect or much more perfect pushes us forward towards more and more perfection since we have to solve our problems such as our many imperfections, it is also why morality is "progressive", so then the essence of morality become that morality is progressing towards the goal that is that we become perfect or much more perfect, so then the other details of morality are abstracted, so then those acts of humans perfectioning or perfecting towards a much more perfect world or perfect world and that are also codified as morality become that morality is universal, since also we can take this essence of morality as the most important thing. More of my philosophy about the superhuman of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche.. I think i am smart philosopher, and i will be more precise in my logical proof of why the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche believed, like the philosopher Spinoza, that morality is not universal, so notice carefully how the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche has wanted to construct a new type of man that is a superhuman in his view and this superhuman in the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a superhuman that has mastery over his emotions and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply existing, so as you are noticing that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is an inferior philosopher since he wanted to apply the morality of the strong to the morality of the weak in not wise manner, also you can notice it more by him saying the following and recognizing that there is different types of morals, and here is his saying: "It is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the slaves or the weak." That means in french: "C'est la volonté de puissance qui doit s'exprimer, non pas la morale des esclaves ou des faibles.", So the above saying of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is a proof that he recognized that there is different kinds of morals like the morals of the slaves or the weak and morals of the strong humans or the strong. Read more my following thoughts about it and about Stoicism and existentialism and about how i am explaining that the essence of morality is universal: More of my philosophy about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and more.. I have just looked at the following video about: NIETZSCHE - L'exaltation de la vie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeVVtxlg_oE I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that the philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not good, since he says that: "C'est la volonté de puissance qui doit s'exprimer, non pas la morale des esclaves ou des faibles.", that means in english: "It is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the slaves or the weak.", and he said that it needs to construct a new man that we call the superhuman, but I think that i am a philosopher that is smart and i am understanding the philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, and i think that it is an inferior philosophy, because it seeks to construct the superhumans from humans and this superhuman in the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a superhuman that has mastery over his emotions and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply existing, so as you are noticing that it is an inferior philosophy, because how can you be able to take joy in simply existing ? so as you are noticing it is illogical and it is as illogical as Stoicism(read my below thoughts about Stoicism) and i think that it is a violent philosophy as Stoicism, this is why the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsch is a failure as Stoicism, and here is what i said about Stoicism: More of my philosophy about my philosophy and about Stoicism and Existentialism.. I invite you to read this very interesting article about philosophy: Why philosophers could be the ones to transform your 2020 https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20200114-why-philosophers-could-be-the-ones-to-transform-your-2020 And notice that it says the following: "The Stoics suggest that what's most important in order to lead a good life is internal rather than external. It's about developing the right character, the right state of mind," I think i am a philosopher that is "smart", so i make you notice the logical bug in the above saying about Stoicism, and it is that developing the right character and the right state of the mind in Stoicism needs the cultural side that also comes from the external reality and hence from the "purpose" and the "meaning of life", and we can notice that Stoicism is not so smart, because how can we develop self-control and fortitude as a means of overcoming destructive emotions and such without the necessary requirements that have to give enough hope or a meaning of life that gives the necessary self-control and fortitude? so this is why i think that Stoicism as a philosophy is a failure, so what's about existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre ? Jean-Paul Sartre said that: "Existence precedes essence" or in french: "L'existence précède l'essence", and it is the central claim of existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, but i think that this claim is not so logical, since it is like a debate that asks the question of: Wich is more important, the genetical side or cultural side?, and we have to notice that the essence or nature of a human is "not" enough and it needs for example a meaning of human life and a purpose etc. so then notice that existentialism of Jean-Paul Sartre, and like in absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, says that human life is absurd, but here again my new philosophy says that human life is not absurd, and read it below. My philosophy about the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre and more.. I invite you to look at the following video about philosophy: SARTRE - Le regard des autres https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJIM41TnDHI I have just noticed by looking at the above video, that it is lacking, since first you have to understand the following: Jean-Paul Sartre said that: "Existence precedes essence" or in french: "L'existence précède l'essence", and it is the central claim of existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre. But i think people are not understanding the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, since the functionality of our essence is also our genetics that predetermines to a certain level what is our existence, so the essence that is our genetics is also important, but since the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre was a communist, he has wanted to give much more "hope" by saying: "Existence precedes essence", and i think this also means that humans are by essence free, and this also means that the human nurture is much more important than the human nature, but it is not truth, so i think that Jean-Paul Sartre has made a big error by saying so. And Jean-Paul Sartre has also accepted the views of the philosopher Albert Camus about the absurdism of existence, but i am a philosopher and here again i am not in accordand with it, since i say that human existence is not absurd, and read my below thoughts to understand my philosophy: How can you effectively "measure" how to appreciate human life ? I think the most important thing is to know that we can measure it relatively or absolutely, so wich one of the absolute or relative measure is the right way of measuring ? so now you have to know that i think that the meaning of human life can not be measured like absolutely like was doing the philosopher Albert Camus since you will start to say by measuring like absolutely that human life is "absurd", and this is not good at all, so now you have to understand the very basis of philosophy, that philosophy has to give you the will to survive or the will to live, so then you logically notice that we can say that a human is smart if he is smart relatively to the distribution of smartness of humans or such, but if you start to measure it like absolutely by saying that the smart human is not smart when you look at all or measuring it by all the difficulties and constraints of our world or of our universe, i think it is not the right way to do in philosophy, since you have to give the will to people so that they survive and so that they live, also you have to give a meaning to human life as i am doing it in my philosophy(read about it below), so now i can finally say that you are understanding the how to answer the above philosophical question since you have to measure how to appreciate human life "relatively" and "not" like absolutely by looking at how our past humanity was much less advanced than our today humanity etc. and so the other important thing is to also understand the basis of my philosophy by reading it below: I think that my philosophy is more smart, since in my philosophy i am also explaining that the day permits to understand the night and human life is like the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty, since human life is difficulties and suffering that also permit us to appreciate much more human life or that permits us to appreciate much more our kind of civilization and i say in my philosophy that it also gives more intensity to pleasures of life, so my philosophy doesn't look like the other philosophies, so i invite you to holistically understand my philosophy by carefully reading it here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI And read my other thoughts of my philosophy here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/8jzgRGMOEHs More of my philosophy about the ideas of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer and more.. I invite you to read the following article about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer: The Ideas Of Friedrich Nietzsche https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ideas-friedrich-nietzsche-dr-marcel-pflug-mba I think i am a smart philosopher, and i am noticing that the philosophers Friedrich Nietzsche and Arthur Schopenhauer are inferior philosophers, and i will explain as following: Notice in the above article the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche has a problem with morality, and he thought, like the philosopher Spinoza, that morality is not universal and he also thought that since for example for the strong human the good becomes the brave, powerful, rich, and strong, so he thought that the strong human will have the tendency to discriminate the weak people, so then the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche thought that morality was not working, but i think that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche was an inferior philosopher since i think i am a philosopher that is smart and i am explaining that the essence of morality is universal and progressive, read my thoughts below about it to understand, and also i am saying that we have not to be pessimistic as the philosophers Friedrich Nietzsche and Arthur Schopenhauer, since i have just spoken about the value of specialization that gives a self-esteem to the individuals of a society and i am explaining in my below thoughts of my new philosophy how we have to be optimistic about human life, and i invite you to read my below thoughts so that to understand: More of my philosophy about universal Love and beauty.. I think i am smart, and i think i am a wise type of person, Now i can ask the following philosophical questions: Does Love is subjective ? Does Beauty is subjective ? Here is my answer: I think i am smart, and i will say that you have to know how to measure it, so you have to know how to "prioritize" by weights of importance, i mean that that so that to know about beauty, there is two ways of doing it, first there is the inferior way of doing it by looking at beauty superficially , and it becomes an a not exact appearance and a not so good measure, and there is the second way that is like scientific and it is to measure beauty with our smartness, by prioritizing and say that the smartests and wise persons among us have to measure beauty and Love and know if we can calling them beauty and Love and if we can accept them as beauty and Love, so then by measuring it this way with smartness and wisdom we can then say that Love and beauty don't become subjective, and as you have just noticed yesterday i said that Love looks like artificial intelligence, since it needs an action that merits a reward (as Love), and you can know more about it by reading my following new proverb: Here is my new proverb: "We can ask of from where comes the attachment of Love between a mother and her son ? so i think i am smart and i will say that it comes from the fact that it is like a reward, that the son is loving or is being the son and the mother is giving a good reward like giving him more security or giving him food to eat, so as you are noticing that this rule can be applied to consumerism, since you can use the same rule with your consumers in a smart way, for example by giving the impression to your consumers that you take care of there security by learning them with easy or the like, and then the consumers will love you much more and will be attracted by you." So then we can say much more precisely that Love needs an action and its reward (as Love), but there is individual love that is like a process of local optimization and there is universal Love that is a process of global optimization in a society that also can comes with a "margin" that makes us also be a level of tolerance on this or that action. And notice with me that it looks like the optimization of particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial intelligence, since the local local optimization PSO is like the process of individual Love, and the global optimization of PSO is like the process of the global Love in a society, and of course particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial intelligence is like Reinforcement Learning in AI(artificial intelligence), since in PSO in artificial intelligence we have the actions of the members of the population of PSO that searches for the optimal value that are found that are then rewarded by making them the values that optimizes further and further towards the global optimum. And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44 More of my philosophy about the too much individualism of the West.. I invite you to look at the following known psychologist that is talking about self-esteem: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9f3qyNNtpQk So i am smart and i am not in accordance with the psychologist in the above video since he is saying that self-esteem comes from comparing your value with the others in a society, but i think it is a too much individualistic definition, since the value of an individual of a society comes also from the fact that the society also gives a certain level of importance to its parts that are the individuals that constitutes the society and that are specialized in this or that job, and this "specialization" is also important for the society and it |
| Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com>: Sep 29 04:13AM > Hello, > Read again, i correct about more of my philosophy about why morality is > universal.. Morality is not universal. It was moral to kill gays, and to eat enemy, incest also, now it is not. It depends on age. Some still lives in prechistorical age like Your Country. > man: > "A wise man is not only more smart, but he has also other genetical > characteristics, and it is that he can intellectually You are just Loony, shouting wall of unformated text.. > Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. Your Welcome.. -- 7-77-777 Evil Sinner! |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 28 07:03PM -0700 Hello, More of my philosophy about monotheistic religions and about economic Liberalism and capitalism and more.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I think i am smart and i am not wasting too much time with monotheistic religions, since there deficiencies is that they have the same deficiency as socialism, since they give too much importance to the "social" side, so they waste too much money on the social, so they neglect to balance it correctly by being efficient economy, also they have another deficiency is that they give too much time to the hereafter(life after death) and they neglect to efficiently work this life, so Islamic Iran has the same problem, but Israel is not a theocracy, so as you are noticing that the current way of doing is that we are putting the mechanisms that bring the right quality, for example Democracy comes with mechanisms that brings quality, even economic Liberalism of the philosopher and economist Adam Smith says that we have to enhance the intellectual taste or taste by for example being well educated with a good education system so that to enhance the quality of the products and services. And i invite you to read my following thoughts about Democracy and more so that to understand: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vlDWhmf-MIM More of my philosophy about why morality is universal.. I think i am a smart philosopher, and i will now explain why morality is universal: So take a look at the thing that we call "time", so you can naively look at our everyday life and say that time is not relative, but you can like Einstein analyse it and prove that time is relative, and morality is the same, so when you naively look at it you will think that morality is relative, since you can notice that for example there is many countries with many laws and rules, but when you analyse it you will notice that the goal of morality that we become perfect or much more perfect pushes us forward towards more and more perfection since we have to solve our problems such as our many imperfections, it is also why morality is "progressive", so then the essence of morality become that morality is progressing towards the goal that is that we become perfect or much more perfect, so then the other details of morality are abstracted, so then those acts of humans perfectioning or perfecting towards a much more perfect world or perfect world and that are also codified as morality become that morality is universal, since also we can take this essence of morality as the most important thing. More of my philosophy about the superhuman of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche.. I think i am smart philosopher, and i will be more precise in my logical proof of why the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche believed, like the philosopher Spinoza, that morality is not universal, so notice carefully how the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche has wanted to construct a new type of man that is a superhuman in his view and this superhuman in the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a superhuman that has mastery over his emotions and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply existing, so as you are noticing that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is an inferior philosopher since he wanted to apply the morality of the strong to the morality of the weak in not wise manner, also you can notice it more by him saying the following and recognizing that there is different types of morals, and here is his saying: "It is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the slaves or the weak." That means in french: "C'est la volonté de puissance qui doit s'exprimer, non pas la morale des esclaves ou des faibles.", So the above saying of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is a proof that he recognized that there is different kinds of morals like the morals of the slaves or the weak and morals of the strong humans or the strong. Read more my following thoughts about it and about Stoicism and existentialism and about how i am explaining that the essence of morality is universal: More of my philosophy about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and more.. I have just looked at the following video about: NIETZSCHE - L'exaltation de la vie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeVVtxlg_oE I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that the philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not good, since he says that: "C'est la volonté de puissance qui doit s'exprimer, non pas la morale des esclaves ou des faibles.", that means in english: "It is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the slaves or the weak.", and he said that it needs to construct a new man that we call the superhuman, but I think that i am a philosopher that is smart and i am understanding the philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, and i think that it is an inferior philosophy, because it seeks to construct the superhumans from humans and this superhuman in the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a superhuman that has mastery over his emotions and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply existing, so as you are noticing that it is an inferior philosophy, because how can you be able to take joy in simply existing ? so as you are noticing it is illogical and it is as illogical as Stoicism(read my below thoughts about Stoicism) and i think that it is a violent philosophy as Stoicism, this is why the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsch is a failure as Stoicism, and here is what i said about Stoicism: More of my philosophy about my philosophy and about Stoicism and Existentialism.. I invite you to read this very interesting article about philosophy: Why philosophers could be the ones to transform your 2020 https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20200114-why-philosophers-could-be-the-ones-to-transform-your-2020 And notice that it says the following: "The Stoics suggest that what's most important in order to lead a good life is internal rather than external. It's about developing the right character, the right state of mind," I think i am a philosopher that is "smart", so i make you notice the logical bug in the above saying about Stoicism, and it is that developing the right character and the right state of the mind in Stoicism needs the cultural side that also comes from the external reality and hence from the "purpose" and the "meaning of life", and we can notice that Stoicism is not so smart, because how can we develop self-control and fortitude as a means of overcoming destructive emotions and such without the necessary requirements that have to give enough hope or a meaning of life that gives the necessary self-control and fortitude? so this is why i think that Stoicism as a philosophy is a failure, so what's about existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre ? Jean-Paul Sartre said that: "Existence precedes essence" or in french: "L'existence précède l'essence", and it is the central claim of existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, but i think that this claim is not so logical, since it is like a debate that asks the question of: Wich is more important, the genetical side or cultural side?, and we have to notice that the essence or nature of a human is "not" enough and it needs for example a meaning of human life and a purpose etc. so then notice that existentialism of Jean-Paul Sartre, and like in absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, says that human life is absurd, but here again my new philosophy says that human life is not absurd, and read it below. My philosophy about the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre and more.. I invite you to look at the following video about philosophy: SARTRE - Le regard des autres https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJIM41TnDHI I have just noticed by looking at the above video, that it is lacking, since first you have to understand the following: Jean-Paul Sartre said that: "Existence precedes essence" or in french: "L'existence précède l'essence", and it is the central claim of existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre. But i think people are not understanding the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, since the functionality of our essence is also our genetics that predetermines to a certain level what is our existence, so the essence that is our genetics is also important, but since the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre was a communist, he has wanted to give much more "hope" by saying: "Existence precedes essence", and i think this also means that humans are by essence free, and this also means that the human nurture is much more important than the human nature, but it is not truth, so i think that Jean-Paul Sartre has made a big error by saying so. And Jean-Paul Sartre has also accepted the views of the philosopher Albert Camus about the absurdism of existence, but i am a philosopher and here again i am not in accordand with it, since i say that human existence is not absurd, and read my below thoughts to understand my philosophy: How can you effectively "measure" how to appreciate human life ? I think the most important thing is to know that we can measure it relatively or absolutely, so wich one of the absolute or relative measure is the right way of measuring ? so now you have to know that i think that the meaning of human life can not be measured like absolutely like was doing the philosopher Albert Camus since you will start to say by measuring like absolutely that human life is "absurd", and this is not good at all, so now you have to understand the very basis of philosophy, that philosophy has to give you the will to survive or the will to live, so then you logically notice that we can say that a human is smart if he is smart relatively to the distribution of smartness of humans or such, but if you start to measure it like absolutely by saying that the smart human is not smart when you look at all or measuring it by all the difficulties and constraints of our world or of our universe, i think it is not the right way to do in philosophy, since you have to give the will to people so that they survive and so that they live, also you have to give a meaning to human life as i am doing it in my philosophy(read about it below), so now i can finally say that you are understanding the how to answer the above philosophical question since you have to measure how to appreciate human life "relatively" and "not" like absolutely by looking at how our past humanity was much less advanced than our today humanity etc. and so the other important thing is to also understand the basis of my philosophy by reading it below: I think that my philosophy is more smart, since in my philosophy i am also explaining that the day permits to understand the night and human life is like the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty, since human life is difficulties and suffering that also permit us to appreciate much more human life or that permits us to appreciate much more our kind of civilization and i say in my philosophy that it also gives more intensity to pleasures of life, so my philosophy doesn't look like the other philosophies, so i invite you to holistically understand my philosophy by carefully reading it here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI And read my other thoughts of my philosophy here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/8jzgRGMOEHs More of my philosophy about the ideas of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer and more.. I invite you to read the following article about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer: The Ideas Of Friedrich Nietzsche https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ideas-friedrich-nietzsche-dr-marcel-pflug-mba I think i am a smart philosopher, and i am noticing that the philosophers Friedrich Nietzsche and Arthur Schopenhauer are inferior philosophers, and i will explain as following: Notice in the above article the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche has a problem with morality, and he thought, like the philosopher Spinoza, that morality is not universal and he also thought that since for example for the strong human the good becomes the brave, powerful, rich, and strong, so he thought that the strong human will have the tendency to discriminate the weak people, so then the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche thought that morality was not working, but i think that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche was an inferior philosopher since i think i am a philosopher that is smart and i am explaining that the essence of morality is universal and progressive, read my thoughts below about it to understand, and also i am saying that we have not to be pessimistic as the philosophers Friedrich Nietzsche and Arthur Schopenhauer, since i have just spoken about the value of specialization that gives a self-esteem to the individuals of a society and i am explaining in my below thoughts of my new philosophy how we have to be optimistic about human life, and i invite you to read my below thoughts so that to understand: More of my philosophy about universal Love and beauty.. I think i am smart, and i think i am a wise type of person, Now i can ask the following philosophical questions: Does Love is subjective ? Does Beauty is subjective ? Here is my answer: I think i am smart, and i will say that you have to know how to measure it, so you have to know how to "prioritize" by weights of importance, i mean that that so that to know about beauty, there is two ways of doing it, first there is the inferior way of doing it by looking at beauty superficially , and it becomes an a not exact appearance and a not so good measure, and there is the second way that is like scientific and it is to measure beauty with our smartness, by prioritizing and say that the smartests and wise persons among us have to measure beauty and Love and know if we can calling them beauty and Love and if we can accept them as beauty and Love, so then by measuring it this way with smartness and wisdom we can then say that Love and beauty don't become subjective, and as you have just noticed yesterday i said that Love looks like artificial intelligence, since it needs an action that merits a reward (as Love), and you can know more about it by reading my following new proverb: Here is my new proverb: "We can ask of from where comes the attachment of Love between a mother and her son ? so i think i am smart and i will say that it comes from the fact that it is like a reward, that the son is loving or is being the son and the mother is giving a good reward like giving him more security or giving him food to eat, so as you are noticing that this rule can be applied to consumerism, since you can use the same rule with your consumers in a smart way, for example by giving the impression to your consumers that you take care of there security by learning them with easy or the like, and then the consumers will love you much more and will be attracted by you." So then we can say much more precisely that Love needs an action and its reward (as Love), but there is individual love that is like a process of local optimization and there is universal Love that is a process of global optimization in a society that also can comes with a "margin" that makes us also be a level of tolerance on this or that action. And notice with me that it looks like the optimization of particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial intelligence, since the local local optimization PSO is like the process of individual Love, and the global optimization of PSO is like the process of the global Love in a society, and of course particle swarm optimization (PSO) |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 28 06:11PM -0700 Hello, More of my philosophy about why morality is universal.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I think i am a smart philosopher, and i will now explain why morality is universal: So take a look at the thing that we call "time", so you can naively look at our everyday life and say that time is not relative, but you can like Einstein analyse it and prove that time is relative, and morality is the same, so when you naively look at it you will think that morality is relative, since you can notice that for example there is many countries with many laws and rules, but when you analyse it you will notice that the goal of morality that we become perfect or much more perfect pushes us forward towards more and more perfection since we have to solve our problems such as our many imperfections, it is also why morality is "progressive", so then the essence of morality can become that morality is progressing towards the goal that is that we become perfect or much more perfect, so then the other details of morality are abstracted, so then this acts of humans perfectioning or perfecting towards a much more perfect world or perfect world and that are also codified as morality become that morality is universal, since also we can take this essence of morality as the most important thing. More of my philosophy about the superhuman of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche.. I think i am smart philosopher, and i will be more precise in my logical proof of why the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche believed, like the philosopher Spinoza, that morality is not universal, so notice carefully how the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche has wanted to construct a new type of man that is a superhuman in his view and this superhuman in the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a superhuman that has mastery over his emotions and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply existing, so as you are noticing that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is an inferior philosopher since he wanted to apply the morality of the strong to the morality of the weak in not wise manner, also you can notice it more by him saying the following and recognizing that there is different types of morals, and here is his saying: "It is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the slaves or the weak." That means in french: "C'est la volonté de puissance qui doit s'exprimer, non pas la morale des esclaves ou des faibles.", So the above saying of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is a proof that he recognized that there is different kinds of morals like the morals of the slaves or the weak and morals of the strong humans or the strong. Read more my following thoughts about it and about Stoicism and existentialism and about how i am explaining that the essence of morality is universal: More of my philosophy about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and more.. I have just looked at the following video about: NIETZSCHE - L'exaltation de la vie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeVVtxlg_oE I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that the philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not good, since he says that: "C'est la volonté de puissance qui doit s'exprimer, non pas la morale des esclaves ou des faibles.", that means in english: "It is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the slaves or the weak.", and he said that it needs to construct a new man that we call the superhuman, but I think that i am a philosopher that is smart and i am understanding the philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, and i think that it is an inferior philosophy, because it seeks to construct the superhumans from humans and this superhuman in the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a superhuman that has mastery over his emotions and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply existing, so as you are noticing that it is an inferior philosophy, because how can you be able to take joy in simply existing ? so as you are noticing it is illogical and it is as illogical as Stoicism(read my below thoughts about Stoicism) and i think that it is a violent philosophy as Stoicism, this is why the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsch is a failure as Stoicism, and here is what i said about Stoicism: More of my philosophy about my philosophy and about Stoicism and Existentialism.. I invite you to read this very interesting article about philosophy: Why philosophers could be the ones to transform your 2020 https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20200114-why-philosophers-could-be-the-ones-to-transform-your-2020 And notice that it says the following: "The Stoics suggest that what's most important in order to lead a good life is internal rather than external. It's about developing the right character, the right state of mind," I think i am a philosopher that is "smart", so i make you notice the logical bug in the above saying about Stoicism, and it is that developing the right character and the right state of the mind in Stoicism needs the cultural side that also comes from the external reality and hence from the "purpose" and the "meaning of life", and we can notice that Stoicism is not so smart, because how can we develop self-control and fortitude as a means of overcoming destructive emotions and such without the necessary requirements that have to give enough hope or a meaning of life that gives the necessary self-control and fortitude? so this is why i think that Stoicism as a philosophy is a failure, so what's about existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre ? Jean-Paul Sartre said that: "Existence precedes essence" or in french: "L'existence précède l'essence", and it is the central claim of existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, but i think that this claim is not so logical, since it is like a debate that asks the question of: Wich is more important, the genetical side or cultural side?, and we have to notice that the essence or nature of a human is "not" enough and it needs for example a meaning of human life and a purpose etc. so then notice that existentialism of Jean-Paul Sartre, and like in absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, says that human life is absurd, but here again my new philosophy says that human life is not absurd, and read it below. My philosophy about the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre and more.. I invite you to look at the following video about philosophy: SARTRE - Le regard des autres https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJIM41TnDHI I have just noticed by looking at the above video, that it is lacking, since first you have to understand the following: Jean-Paul Sartre said that: "Existence precedes essence" or in french: "L'existence précède l'essence", and it is the central claim of existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre. But i think people are not understanding the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, since the functionality of our essence is also our genetics that predetermines to a certain level what is our existence, so the essence that is our genetics is also important, but since the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre was a communist, he has wanted to give much more "hope" by saying: "Existence precedes essence", and i think this also means that humans are by essence free, and this also means that the human nurture is much more important than the human nature, but it is not truth, so i think that Jean-Paul Sartre has made a big error by saying so. And Jean-Paul Sartre has also accepted the views of the philosopher Albert Camus about the absurdism of existence, but i am a philosopher and here again i am not in accordand with it, since i say that human existence is not absurd, and read my below thoughts to understand my philosophy: How can you effectively "measure" how to appreciate human life ? I think the most important thing is to know that we can measure it relatively or absolutely, so wich one of the absolute or relative measure is the right way of measuring ? so now you have to know that i think that the meaning of human life can not be measured like absolutely like was doing the philosopher Albert Camus since you will start to say by measuring like absolutely that human life is "absurd", and this is not good at all, so now you have to understand the very basis of philosophy, that philosophy has to give you the will to survive or the will to live, so then you logically notice that we can say that a human is smart if he is smart relatively to the distribution of smartness of humans or such, but if you start to measure it like absolutely by saying that the smart human is not smart when you look at all or measuring it by all the difficulties and constraints of our world or of our universe, i think it is not the right way to do in philosophy, since you have to give the will to people so that they survive and so that they live, also you have to give a meaning to human life as i am doing it in my philosophy(read about it below), so now i can finally say that you are understanding the how to answer the above philosophical question since you have to measure how to appreciate human life "relatively" and "not" like absolutely by looking at how our past humanity was much less advanced than our today humanity etc. and so the other important thing is to also understand the basis of my philosophy by reading it below: I think that my philosophy is more smart, since in my philosophy i am also explaining that the day permits to understand the night and human life is like the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty, since human life is difficulties and suffering that also permit us to appreciate much more human life or that permits us to appreciate much more our kind of civilization and i say in my philosophy that it also gives more intensity to pleasures of life, so my philosophy doesn't look like the other philosophies, so i invite you to holistically understand my philosophy by carefully reading it here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI And read my other thoughts of my philosophy here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/8jzgRGMOEHs More of my philosophy about the ideas of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer and more.. I invite you to read the following article about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer: The Ideas Of Friedrich Nietzsche https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ideas-friedrich-nietzsche-dr-marcel-pflug-mba I think i am a smart philosopher, and i am noticing that the philosophers Friedrich Nietzsche and Arthur Schopenhauer are inferior philosophers, and i will explain as following: Notice in the above article the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche has a problem with morality, and he thought, like the philosopher Spinoza, that morality is not universal and he also thought that since for example for the strong human the good becomes the brave, powerful, rich, and strong, so he thought that the strong human will have the tendency to discriminate the weak people, so then the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche thought that morality was not working, but i think that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche was an inferior philosopher since i think i am a philosopher that is smart and i am explaining that the essence of morality is universal and progressive, read my thoughts below about it to understand, and also i am saying that we have not to be pessimistic as the philosophers Friedrich Nietzsche and Arthur Schopenhauer, since i have just spoken about the value of specialization that gives a self-esteem to the individuals of a society and i am explaining in my below thoughts of my new philosophy how we have to be optimistic about human life, and i invite you to read my below thoughts so that to understand: More of my philosophy about universal Love and beauty.. I think i am smart, and i think i am a wise type of person, Now i can ask the following philosophical questions: Does Love is subjective ? Does Beauty is subjective ? Here is my answer: I think i am smart, and i will say that you have to know how to measure it, so you have to know how to "prioritize" by weights of importance, i mean that that so that to know about beauty, there is two ways of doing it, first there is the inferior way of doing it by looking at beauty superficially , and it becomes an a not exact appearance and a not so good measure, and there is the second way that is like scientific and it is to measure beauty with our smartness, by prioritizing and say that the smartests and wise persons among us have to measure beauty and Love and know if we can calling them beauty and Love and if we can accept them as beauty and Love, so then by measuring it this way with smartness and wisdom we can then say that Love and beauty don't become subjective, and as you have just noticed yesterday i said that Love looks like artificial intelligence, since it needs an action that merits a reward (as Love), and you can know more about it by reading my following new proverb: Here is my new proverb: "We can ask of from where comes the attachment of Love between a mother and her son ? so i think i am smart and i will say that it comes from the fact that it is like a reward, that the son is loving or is being the son and the mother is giving a good reward like giving him more security or giving him food to eat, so as you are noticing that this rule can be applied to consumerism, since you can use the same rule with your consumers in a smart way, for example by giving the impression to your consumers that you take care of there security by learning them with easy or the like, and then the consumers will love you much more and will be attracted by you." So then we can say much more precisely that Love needs an action and its reward (as Love), but there is individual love that is like a process of local optimization and there is universal Love that is a process of global optimization in a society that also can comes with a "margin" that makes us also be a level of tolerance on this or that action. And notice with me that it looks like the optimization of particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial intelligence, since the local local optimization PSO is like the process of individual Love, and the global optimization of PSO is like the process of the global Love in a society, and of course particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial intelligence is like Reinforcement Learning in AI(artificial intelligence), since in PSO in artificial intelligence we have the actions of the members of the population of PSO that searches for the optimal value that are found that are then rewarded by making them the values that optimizes further and further towards the global optimum. And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44 More of my philosophy about the too much individualism of the West.. I invite you to look at the following known psychologist that is talking about self-esteem: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9f3qyNNtpQk So i am smart and i am not in accordance with the psychologist in the above video since he is saying that self-esteem comes from comparing your value with the others in a society, but i think it is a too much individualistic definition, since the value of an individual of a society comes also from the fact that the society also gives a certain level of importance to its parts that are the individuals that constitutes the society and that are specialized in this or that job, and this "specialization" is also important for the society and it has a value in a |
| Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com>: Sep 29 12:56AM > ????????? Average Joe, what is noise, places above, and what is essence does not see, I do opposite. This is why, to average Joe, that looks abnormal. This is how magick works. -- 7-77-777 Evil Sinner! |
| Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com>: Sep 29 12:54AM > relax............................ Yeah, something is needed, he just barks at she Moon :P -- 7-77-777 Evil Sinner! |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 28 04:22PM -0700 Hello, More of my philosophy about the superhuman of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I think i am a smart philosopher, and i will be more precise in my logical proof of why the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche believed, like the philosopher Spinoza, that morality is not universal, so notice carefully how the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche has wanted to construct a new type of man that is a superhuman in his view and this superhuman in the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a superhuman that has mastery over his emotions and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply existing, so as you are noticing that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is an inferior philosopher since he wanted to apply the morality of the strong to the morality of the weak in not wise manner, also you can notice it more by him saying the following and recognizing that there is different types of morals, and here is his saying: "It is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the slaves or the weak." That means in french: "C'est la volonté de puissance qui doit s'exprimer, non pas la morale des esclaves ou des faibles.", So the above saying of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is a proof that he recognized that there is different kinds of morals like the morals of the slaves or the weak and morals of the strong humans or the strong. Read more my following thoughts about it and about Stoicism and existentialism and about how i am explaining that the essence of morality is universal: More of my philosophy about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and more.. I have just looked at the following video about: NIETZSCHE - L'exaltation de la vie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeVVtxlg_oE I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that the philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not good, since he says that: "C'est la volonté de puissance qui doit s'exprimer, non pas la morale des esclaves ou des faibles.", that means in english: "It is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the slaves or the weak.", and he said that it needs to construct a new man that we call the superhuman, but I think that i am a philosopher that is smart and i am understanding the philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, and i think that it is an inferior philosophy, because it seeks to construct the superhumans from humans and this superhuman in the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a superhuman that has mastery over his emotions and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply existing, so as you are noticing that it is an inferior philosophy, because how can you be able to take joy in simply existing ? so as you are noticing it is illogical and it is as illogical as Stoicism(read my below thoughts about Stoicism) and i think that it is a violent philosophy as Stoicism, this is why the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsch is a failure as Stoicism, and here is what i said about Stoicism: More of my philosophy about my philosophy and about Stoicism and Existentialism.. I invite you to read this very interesting article about philosophy: Why philosophers could be the ones to transform your 2020 https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20200114-why-philosophers-could-be-the-ones-to-transform-your-2020 And notice that it says the following: "The Stoics suggest that what's most important in order to lead a good life is internal rather than external. It's about developing the right character, the right state of mind," I think i am a philosopher that is "smart", so i make you notice the logical bug in the above saying about Stoicism, and it is that developing the right character and the right state of the mind in Stoicism needs the cultural side that also comes from the external reality and hence from the "purpose" and the "meaning of life", and we can notice that Stoicism is not so smart, because how can we develop self-control and fortitude as a means of overcoming destructive emotions and such without the necessary requirements that have to give enough hope or a meaning of life that gives the necessary self-control and fortitude? so this is why i think that Stoicism as a philosophy is a failure, so what's about existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre ? Jean-Paul Sartre said that: "Existence precedes essence" or in french: "L'existence précède l'essence", and it is the central claim of existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, but i think that this claim is not so logical, since it is like a debate that asks the question of: Wich is more important, the genetical side or cultural side?, and we have to notice that the essence or nature of a human is "not" enough and it needs for example a meaning of human life and a purpose etc. so then notice that existentialism of Jean-Paul Sartre, and like in absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, says that human life is absurd, but here again my new philosophy says that human life is not absurd, and read it below. My philosophy about the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre and more.. I invite you to look at the following video about philosophy: SARTRE - Le regard des autres https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJIM41TnDHI I have just noticed by looking at the above video, that it is lacking, since first you have to understand the following: Jean-Paul Sartre said that: "Existence precedes essence" or in french: "L'existence précède l'essence", and it is the central claim of existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre. But i think people are not understanding the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, since the functionality of our essence is also our genetics that predetermines to a certain level what is our existence, so the essence that is our genetics is also important, but since the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre was a communist, he has wanted to give much more "hope" by saying: "Existence precedes essence", and i think this also means that humans are by essence free, and this also means that the human nurture is much more important than the human nature, but it is not truth, so i think that Jean-Paul Sartre has made a big error by saying so. And Jean-Paul Sartre has also accepted the views of the philosopher Albert Camus about the absurdism of existence, but i am a philosopher and here again i am not in accordand with it, since i say that human existence is not absurd, and read my below thoughts to understand my philosophy: How can you effectively "measure" how to appreciate human life ? I think the most important thing is to know that we can measure it relatively or absolutely, so wich one of the absolute or relative measure is the right way of measuring ? so now you have to know that i think that the meaning of human life can not be measured like absolutely like was doing the philosopher Albert Camus since you will start to say by measuring like absolutely that human life is "absurd", and this is not good at all, so now you have to understand the very basis of philosophy, that philosophy has to give you the will to survive or the will to live, so then you logically notice that we can say that a human is smart if he is smart relatively to the distribution of smartness of humans or such, but if you start to measure it like absolutely by saying that the smart human is not smart when you look at all or measuring it by all the difficulties and constraints of our world or of our universe, i think it is not the right way to do in philosophy, since you have to give the will to people so that they survive and so that they live, also you have to give a meaning to human life as i am doing it in my philosophy(read about it below), so now i can finally say that you are understanding the how to answer the above philosophical question since you have to measure how to appreciate human life "relatively" and "not" like absolutely by looking at how our past humanity was much less advanced than our today humanity etc. and so the other important thing is to also understand the basis of my philosophy by reading it below: I think that my philosophy is more smart, since in my philosophy i am also explaining that the day permits to understand the night and human life is like the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty, since human life is difficulties and suffering that also permit us to appreciate much more human life or that permits us to appreciate much more our kind of civilization and i say in my philosophy that it also gives more intensity to pleasures of life, so my philosophy doesn't look like the other philosophies, so i invite you to holistically understand my philosophy by carefully reading it here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI And read my other thoughts of my philosophy here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/8jzgRGMOEHs More of my philosophy about the ideas of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer and more.. I invite you to read the following article about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer: The Ideas Of Friedrich Nietzsche https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ideas-friedrich-nietzsche-dr-marcel-pflug-mba I think i am a smart philosopher, and i am noticing that the philosophers Friedrich Nietzsche and Arthur Schopenhauer are inferior philosophers, and i will explain as following: Notice in the above article the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche has a problem with morality, and he thought, like the philosopher Spinoza, that morality is not universal and he also thought that since for example for the strong human the good becomes the brave, powerful, rich, and strong, so he thought that the strong human will have the tendency to discriminate the weak people, so then the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche thought that morality was not working, but i think that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche was an inferior philosopher since i think i am a philosopher that is smart and i am explaining that the essence of morality is universal and progressive, read my thoughts below about it to understand, and also i am saying that we have not to be pessimistic as the philosophers Friedrich Nietzsche and Arthur Schopenhauer, since i have just spoken about the value of specialization that gives a self-esteem to the individuals of a society and i am explaining in my below thoughts of my new philosophy how we have to be optimistic about human life, and i invite you to read my below thoughts so that to understand: More of my philosophy about universal Love and beauty.. I think i am smart, and i think i am a wise type of person, Now i can ask the following philosophical questions: Does Love is subjective ? Does Beauty is subjective ? Here is my answer: I think i am smart, and i will say that you have to know how to measure it, so you have to know how to "prioritize" by weights of importance, i mean that that so that to know about beauty, there is two ways of doing it, first there is the inferior way of doing it by looking at beauty superficially , and it becomes an a not exact appearance and a not so good measure, and there is the second way that is like scientific and it is to measure beauty with our smartness, by prioritizing and say that the smartests and wise persons among us have to measure beauty and Love and know if we can calling them beauty and Love and if we can accept them as beauty and Love, so then by measuring it this way with smartness and wisdom we can then say that Love and beauty don't become subjective, and as you have just noticed yesterday i said that Love looks like artificial intelligence, since it needs an action that merits a reward (as Love), and you can know more about it by reading my following new proverb: Here is my new proverb: "We can ask of from where comes the attachment of Love between a mother and her son ? so i think i am smart and i will say that it comes from the fact that it is like a reward, that the son is loving or is being the son and the mother is giving a good reward like giving him more security or giving him food to eat, so as you are noticing that this rule can be applied to consumerism, since you can use the same rule with your consumers in a smart way, for example by giving the impression to your consumers that you take care of there security by learning them with easy or the like, and then the consumers will love you much more and will be attracted by you." So then we can say much more precisely that Love needs an action and its reward (as Love), but there is individual love that is like a process of local optimization and there is universal Love that is a process of global optimization in a society that also can comes with a "margin" that makes us also be a level of tolerance on this or that action. And notice with me that it looks like the optimization of particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial intelligence, since the local local optimization PSO is like the process of individual Love, and the global optimization of PSO is like the process of the global Love in a society, and of course particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial intelligence is like Reinforcement Learning in AI(artificial intelligence), since in PSO in artificial intelligence we have the actions of the members of the population of PSO that searches for the optimal value that are found that are then rewarded by making them the values that optimizes further and further towards the global optimum. And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44 More of my philosophy about the too much individualism of the West.. I invite you to look at the following known psychologist that is talking about self-esteem: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9f3qyNNtpQk So i am smart and i am not in accordance with the psychologist in the above video since he is saying that self-esteem comes from comparing your value with the others in a society, but i think it is a too much individualistic definition, since the value of an individual of a society comes also from the fact that the society also gives a certain level of importance to its parts that are the individuals that constitutes the society and that are specialized in this or that job, and this "specialization" is also important for the society and it has a value in a society, so then the individual has a value and importance in a society that gives him a self-esteem. More of my philosophy about beauty.. I will ask a philosophical question: Is a beautiful women beautiful ? So it depends on if you are a wise man type of person or not.. Since i think that you have not to rush in like a fool and think that that the women that is beautiful is beautiful, since the wise man says that it first needs "wisdom" so that to also appreciate beauty or so that to appreciate pleasures of human life, so i think that the wise man type of person is like the way, so read my following thoughts so that to understand much more clearly: Here is my other just new proverb: "I think i am a wise type of person and i say that happiness comes from an efficient way of thinking or from imagination, and not from reality and not from pleasures of reality or pleasures of life, since reality when you look at it from the more and more details, it comes with too much imperfections, so the efficient way of thinking or of imagination has to not be "complete" detachment like in Taoism or Buddhism , since i think by being complete detachment like in Taoism or buddhism you will make the engine that pushes you forward towards more |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 28 03:56PM -0700 Hello, More of my philosophy about the logical proof that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche thought that morality is not universal.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I think i am a smart philosopher, so how can i prove that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche thought that morality is not universal ? I will say that you can easily notice it by the fact that he has said the following: "It is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the slaves or the weak." That means in french: "C'est la volonté de puissance qui doit s'exprimer, non pas la morale des esclaves ou des faibles.", So the above saying of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is a proof that he recognized that there is different kinds of morals like the morals of the slaves or the weak and morals of the strong humans or the strong. Read more my following thoughts about it and about Stoicism and existentialism and about how i am explaining that the essence of morality is universal: More of my philosophy about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and more.. I have just looked at the following video about: NIETZSCHE - L'exaltation de la vie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeVVtxlg_oE I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that the philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not good, since he says that: "C'est la volonté de puissance qui doit s'exprimer, non pas la morale des esclaves ou des faibles.", that means in english: "It is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the slaves or the weak.", and he said that it needs to construct a new man that we call the superhuman, but I think that i am a philosopher that is smart and i am understanding the philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, and i think that it is an inferior philosophy, because it seeks to construct the superhumans from humans and this superhuman in the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a superhuman that has mastery over his emotions and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply existing, so as you are noticing that it is an inferior philosophy, because how can you be able to take joy in simply existing ? so as you are noticing it is illogical and it is as illogical as Stoicism(read my below thoughts about Stoicism) and i think that it is a violent philosophy as Stoicism, this is why the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsch is a failure as Stoicism, and here is what i said about Stoicism: More of my philosophy about my philosophy and about Stoicism and Existentialism.. I invite you to read this very interesting article about philosophy: Why philosophers could be the ones to transform your 2020 https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20200114-why-philosophers-could-be-the-ones-to-transform-your-2020 And notice that it says the following: "The Stoics suggest that what's most important in order to lead a good life is internal rather than external. It's about developing the right character, the right state of mind," I think i am a philosopher that is "smart", so i make you notice the logical bug in the above saying about Stoicism, and it is that developing the right character and the right state of the mind in Stoicism needs the cultural side that also comes from the external reality and hence from the "purpose" and the "meaning of life", and we can notice that Stoicism is not so smart, because how can we develop self-control and fortitude as a means of overcoming destructive emotions and such without the necessary requirements that have to give enough hope or a meaning of life that gives the necessary self-control and fortitude? so this is why i think that Stoicism as a philosophy is a failure, so what's about existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre ? Jean-Paul Sartre said that: "Existence precedes essence" or in french: "L'existence précède l'essence", and it is the central claim of existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, but i think that this claim is not so logical, since it is like a debate that asks the question of: Wich is more important, the genetical side or cultural side?, and we have to notice that the essence or nature of a human is "not" enough and it needs for example a meaning of human life and a purpose etc. so then notice that existentialism of Jean-Paul Sartre, and like in absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, says that human life is absurd, but here again my new philosophy says that human life is not absurd, and read it below. My philosophy about the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre and more.. I invite you to look at the following video about philosophy: SARTRE - Le regard des autres https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJIM41TnDHI I have just noticed by looking at the above video, that it is lacking, since first you have to understand the following: Jean-Paul Sartre said that: "Existence precedes essence" or in french: "L'existence précède l'essence", and it is the central claim of existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre. But i think people are not understanding the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, since the functionality of our essence is also our genetics that predetermines to a certain level what is our existence, so the essence that is our genetics is also important, but since the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre was a communist, he has wanted to give much more "hope" by saying: "Existence precedes essence", and i think this also means that humans are by essence free, and this also means that the human nurture is much more important than the human nature, but it is not truth, so i think that Jean-Paul Sartre has made a big error by saying so. And Jean-Paul Sartre has also accepted the views of the philosopher Albert Camus about the absurdism of existence, but i am a philosopher and here again i am not in accordand with it, since i say that human existence is not absurd, and read my below thoughts to understand my philosophy: How can you effectively "measure" how to appreciate human life ? I think the most important thing is to know that we can measure it relatively or absolutely, so wich one of the absolute or relative measure is the right way of measuring ? so now you have to know that i think that the meaning of human life can not be measured like absolutely like was doing the philosopher Albert Camus since you will start to say by measuring like absolutely that human life is "absurd", and this is not good at all, so now you have to understand the very basis of philosophy, that philosophy has to give you the will to survive or the will to live, so then you logically notice that we can say that a human is smart if he is smart relatively to the distribution of smartness of humans or such, but if you start to measure it like absolutely by saying that the smart human is not smart when you look at all or measuring it by all the difficulties and constraints of our world or of our universe, i think it is not the right way to do in philosophy, since you have to give the will to people so that they survive and so that they live, also you have to give a meaning to human life as i am doing it in my philosophy(read about it below), so now i can finally say that you are understanding the how to answer the above philosophical question since you have to measure how to appreciate human life "relatively" and "not" like absolutely by looking at how our past humanity was much less advanced than our today humanity etc. and so the other important thing is to also understand the basis of my philosophy by reading it below: I think that my philosophy is more smart, since in my philosophy i am also explaining that the day permits to understand the night and human life is like the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty, since human life is difficulties and suffering that also permit us to appreciate much more human life or that permits us to appreciate much more our kind of civilization and i say in my philosophy that it also gives more intensity to pleasures of life, so my philosophy doesn't look like the other philosophies, so i invite you to holistically understand my philosophy by carefully reading it here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI And read my other thoughts of my philosophy here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/8jzgRGMOEHs More of my philosophy about the ideas of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer and more.. I invite you to read the following article about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer: The Ideas Of Friedrich Nietzsche https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ideas-friedrich-nietzsche-dr-marcel-pflug-mba I think i am a smart philosopher, and i am noticing that the philosophers Friedrich Nietzsche and Arthur Schopenhauer are inferior philosophers, and i will explain as following: Notice in the above article the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche has a problem with morality, and he thought, like the philosopher Spinoza, that morality is not universal and he also thought that since for example for the strong human the good becomes the brave, powerful, rich, and strong, so he thought that the strong human will have the tendency to discriminate the weak people, so then the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche thought that morality was not working, but i think that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche was an inferior philosopher since i think i am a philosopher that is smart and i am explaining that the essence of morality is universal and progressive, read my thoughts below about it to understand, and also i am saying that we have not to be pessimistic as the philosophers Friedrich Nietzsche and Arthur Schopenhauer, since i have just spoken about the value of specialization that gives a self-esteem to the individuals of a society and i am explaining in my below thoughts of my new philosophy how we have to be optimistic about human life, and i invite you to read my below thoughts so that to understand: More of my philosophy about universal Love and beauty.. I think i am smart, and i think i am a wise type of person, Now i can ask the following philosophical questions: Does Love is subjective ? Does Beauty is subjective ? Here is my answer: I think i am smart, and i will say that you have to know how to measure it, so you have to know how to "prioritize" by weights of importance, i mean that that so that to know about beauty, there is two ways of doing it, first there is the inferior way of doing it by looking at beauty superficially , and it becomes an a not exact appearance and a not so good measure, and there is the second way that is like scientific and it is to measure beauty with our smartness, by prioritizing and say that the smartests and wise persons among us have to measure beauty and Love and know if we can calling them beauty and Love and if we can accept them as beauty and Love, so then by measuring it this way with smartness and wisdom we can then say that Love and beauty don't become subjective, and as you have just noticed yesterday i said that Love looks like artificial intelligence, since it needs an action that merits a reward (as Love), and you can know more about it by reading my following new proverb: Here is my new proverb: "We can ask of from where comes the attachment of Love between a mother and her son ? so i think i am smart and i will say that it comes from the fact that it is like a reward, that the son is loving or is being the son and the mother is giving a good reward like giving him more security or giving him food to eat, so as you are noticing that this rule can be applied to consumerism, since you can use the same rule with your consumers in a smart way, for example by giving the impression to your consumers that you take care of there security by learning them with easy or the like, and then the consumers will love you much more and will be attracted by you." So then we can say much more precisely that Love needs an action and its reward (as Love), but there is individual love that is like a process of local optimization and there is universal Love that is a process of global optimization in a society that also can comes with a "margin" that makes us also be a level of tolerance on this or that action. And notice with me that it looks like the optimization of particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial intelligence, since the local local optimization PSO is like the process of individual Love, and the global optimization of PSO is like the process of the global Love in a society, and of course particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial intelligence is like Reinforcement Learning in AI(artificial intelligence), since in PSO in artificial intelligence we have the actions of the members of the population of PSO that searches for the optimal value that are found that are then rewarded by making them the values that optimizes further and further towards the global optimum. And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44 More of my philosophy about the too much individualism of the West.. I invite you to look at the following known psychologist that is talking about self-esteem: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9f3qyNNtpQk So i am smart and i am not in accordance with the psychologist in the above video since he is saying that self-esteem comes from comparing your value with the others in a society, but i think it is a too much individualistic definition, since the value of an individual of a society comes also from the fact that the society also gives a certain level of importance to its parts that are the individuals that constitutes the society and that are specialized in this or that job, and this "specialization" is also important for the society and it has a value in a society, so then the individual has a value and importance in a society that gives him a self-esteem. More of my philosophy about beauty.. I will ask a philosophical question: Is a beautiful women beautiful ? So it depends on if you are a wise man type of person or not.. Since i think that you have not to rush in like a fool and think that that the women that is beautiful is beautiful, since the wise man says that it first needs "wisdom" so that to also appreciate beauty or so that to appreciate pleasures of human life, so i think that the wise man type of person is like the way, so read my following thoughts so that to understand much more clearly: Here is my other just new proverb: "I think i am a wise type of person and i say that happiness comes from an efficient way of thinking or from imagination, and not from reality and not from pleasures of reality or pleasures of life, since reality when you look at it from the more and more details, it comes with too much imperfections, so the efficient way of thinking or of imagination has to not be "complete" detachment like in Taoism or Buddhism , since i think by being complete detachment like in Taoism or buddhism you will make the engine that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection much more weak, so then you have to be like the right dose of detachment that makes you like well balanced so that it makes you appreciate our world much more, and so that it makes you appreciate much more pleasures of life or so that it makes you appreciate much more life, so then it makes you much more happy. And of course it is inherent to my proverb that when you realize that reality, when you look at it from the more and more details, comes with too much imperfections and that you can not change for the better quickly, you become |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 28 02:58PM -0700 Hello, Read again, i correct about more of my philosophy about the ideas of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer and more.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I invite you to read the following article about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer: The Ideas Of Friedrich Nietzsche https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ideas-friedrich-nietzsche-dr-marcel-pflug-mba I think i am a smart philosopher, and i am noticing that the philosophers Friedrich Nietzsche and Arthur Schopenhauer are inferior philosophers, and i will explain as following: Notice in the above article the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche has a problem with morality, and he thought, like the philosopher Spinoza, that morality is not universal and he also thought that since for example for the strong human the good becomes the brave, powerful, rich, and strong, so he thought that the strong human will have the tendency to discriminate the weak people, so then the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche thought that morality was not working, but i think that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche was an inferior philosopher since i think i am a philosopher that is smart and i am explaining that the essence of morality is universal and progressive, read my thoughts below about it to understand, and also i am saying that we have not to be pessimistic as the philosophers Friedrich Nietzsche and Arthur Schopenhauer, since i have just spoken about the value of specialization that gives a self-esteem to the individuals of a society and i am explaining in my below thoughts of my new philosophy how we have to be optimistic about human life, and i invite you to read my below thoughts so that to understand: More of my philosophy about universal Love and beauty.. I think i am smart, and i think i am a wise type of person, Now i can ask the following philosophical questions: Does Love is subjective ? Does Beauty is subjective ? Here is my answer: I think i am smart, and i will say that you have to know how to measure it, so you have to know how to "prioritize" by weights of importance, i mean that that so that to know about beauty, there is two ways of doing it, first there is the inferior way of doing it by looking at beauty superficially , and it becomes an a not exact appearance and a not so good measure, and there is the second way that is like scientific and it is to measure beauty with our smartness, by prioritizing and say that the smartests and wise persons among us have to measure beauty and Love and know if we can calling them beauty and Love and if we can accept them as beauty and Love, so then by measuring it this way with smartness and wisdom we can then say that Love and beauty don't become subjective, and as you have just noticed yesterday i said that Love looks like artificial intelligence, since it needs an action that merits a reward (as Love), and you can know more about it by reading my following new proverb: Here is my new proverb: "We can ask of from where comes the attachment of Love between a mother and her son ? so i think i am smart and i will say that it comes from the fact that it is like a reward, that the son is loving or is being the son and the mother is giving a good reward like giving him more security or giving him food to eat, so as you are noticing that this rule can be applied to consumerism, since you can use the same rule with your consumers in a smart way, for example by giving the impression to your consumers that you take care of there security by learning them with easy or the like, and then the consumers will love you much more and will be attracted by you." So then we can say much more precisely that Love needs an action and its reward (as Love), but there is individual love that is like a process of local optimization and there is universal Love that is a process of global optimization in a society that also can comes with a "margin" that makes us also be a level of tolerance on this or that action. And notice with me that it looks like the optimization of particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial intelligence, since the local local optimization PSO is like the process of individual Love, and the global optimization of PSO is like the process of the global Love in a society, and of course particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial intelligence is like Reinforcement Learning in AI(artificial intelligence), since in PSO in artificial intelligence we have the actions of the members of the population of PSO that searches for the optimal value that are found that are then rewarded by making them the values that optimizes further and further towards the global optimum. And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44 More of my philosophy about the too much individualism of the West.. I invite you to look at the following known psychologist that is talking about self-esteem: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9f3qyNNtpQk So i am smart and i am not in accordance with the psychologist in the above video since he is saying that self-esteem comes from comparing your value with the others in a society, but i think it is a too much individualistic definition, since the value of an individual of a society comes also from the fact that the society also gives a certain level of importance to its parts that are the individuals that constitutes the society and that are specialized in this or that job, and this "specialization" is also important for the society and it has a value in a society, so then the individual has a value and importance in a society that gives him a self-esteem. More of my philosophy about beauty.. I will ask a philosophical question: Is a beautiful women beautiful ? So it depends on if you are a wise man type of person or not.. Since i think that you have not to rush in like a fool and think that that the women that is beautiful is beautiful, since the wise man says that it first needs "wisdom" so that to also appreciate beauty or so that to appreciate pleasures of human life, so i think that the wise man type of person is like the way, so read my following thoughts so that to understand much more clearly: Here is my other just new proverb: "I think i am a wise type of person and i say that happiness comes from an efficient way of thinking or from imagination, and not from reality and not from pleasures of reality or pleasures of life, since reality when you look at it from the more and more details, it comes with too much imperfections, so the efficient way of thinking or of imagination has to not be "complete" detachment like in Taoism or Buddhism , since i think by being complete detachment like in Taoism or buddhism you will make the engine that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection much more weak, so then you have to be like the right dose of detachment that makes you like well balanced so that it makes you appreciate our world much more, and so that it makes you appreciate much more pleasures of life or so that it makes you appreciate much more life, so then it makes you much more happy. And of course it is inherent to my proverb that when you realize that reality, when you look at it from the more and more details, comes with too much imperfections and that you can not change for the better quickly, you become much more wise with much more patience etc. And i will explain more my new philosophy in my next book that will also extend with much more new creative ideas." More of my philosophy of what is Love.. I think Love looks like artificial intelligence, since it needs an action that merits a reward, but i think that you have also to know how to play it smartly and "wisely", but we have not to be pessimistic since i think that the best way to attain Love is by being more and more wisdom so that to become much more wise or wise, since i am really convinced that by being much more wise or wise you will start to appreciate much more human life in a smart way and be much more happy as i am doing it, and you will start to know how to be a wise type of Love as i am doing it, since i think i am a wise type of person. And so that to know more how i am wise, you can also look at my following poems of Love that looks like my personality since i am also a gentleman type of person: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ITE99pf3KHA And since i am saying above that Love looks like the action and its reward in artificial intelligence, you can read more my following thoughts about artificial intelligence so that to understand more: And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44 Here is my new proverb: "We can ask of from where comes the attachment of Love between a mother and her son ? so i think i am smart and i will say that it comes from the fact that it is like a reward, that the son is loving or is being the son and the mother is giving a good reward like giving him more security or giving him food to eat, so as you are noticing that this rule can be applied to consumerism, since you can use the same rule with your consumers in a smart way, for example by giving the impression to your consumers that you take care of there security by learning them with easy or the like, and then the consumers will love you much more and will be attracted by you." You can read all my other proverbs below: More of my philosophy about money and about the meaning and the purpose of human life.. I think i am smart and i say that Money is not a good and powerful engine, since you can be stupid and think that it is a powerful engine, but when you are a smart philosopher like me you will realize that thinking that Money is a powerful engine is like the big mistake that is making the Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu by thinking that the action itself is sufficient as an engine, and read my thoughts below about it, since the question is how to make humans more "strong" and "energetic" and "positive" so that they be pushed forward towards more and more perfection. So this is why i am talking in my new philosophy about those kind of powerful "engines". More of my philosophy about the meaning and the purpose of human life.. I think i am smart, and as you have just noticed i am not speaking in my new philosophy about the belonging to a society or to group with a good purpose, since you can think that the pillars of the meaning of human life are the belonging to a society or group with a good purpose and with a kind of transcendence and such, but i think i am a philosopher and i say it is not the right way, since i think what is the best and right way is to talk about what are the good and powerful "engines" that make you have this good meaning and purpose of human life, this is why you have to read my below thoughts of my philosophy so that to notice my kind of new philosophy and i am extending much more my new philosophy with other much more creative ideas: More of my philosophy about the Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu.. I invite you to look at the following video about the Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu: Let It Go, Ride the Wind | The Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vA7Q8zb1hVU I think i am smart, and i am noticing in the above video that the Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu has a problem, since notice that it says the following: "Lieh Tsu shows us that only when we transcend the duality of life - things like gain and loss, attraction and repulsion, wonderful and awful, we can become truly indifferent, and start acting for no other reason than the action itself." So the problem with this, it is one of the engine, since we have to have a powerful engine that pushes us forward towards more and more perfection, and since the Philosopher Lieh Tzu says that we have to transcend the duality and become truly indifferent, and start acting for no other reason than the action itself, but how can you be pushed forward towards more and more perfection by just the action in itself, so then the engine becomes much more weak, so the Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu is problematic. But my new philosophy below is different, since as you notice in my below proverb that it is not a "complete" detachment and it comes like with the right dose of detachment, since you have to understand more my proverb below, and it is that pleasures of consumerism are not sufficient so that to become happy or much more happy, since it needs from you to change your state of the mind or your kind of thinking so that to attain happiness, and it is why is explaining my new proverb below, so read all my thoughts below so that to understand: More of my philosophy about how to be harmony and how to be happy and more.. I think i am smart, and i say that the philosopher Baruch Spinoza said that the being strong makes you happy and the being weak makes you sad, but so that to be smart, we have to be pragmatic and learn the others the how to be strong, and we have to learn them the how to be harmony in a society and how to be harmony with themselves, so as you are noticing that i am in accordance with the philosopher Baruch Spinoza on the fact that the being strong makes you happy and the being weak makes you sad, and here is my new proverb that talks about it more clearly: Here is my other new proverb in english and french: Voici mon nouveau proverbe en français et en anglais: "La stabilité s'obtient avec la force de la perfection, car quand vous devenez plus parfait vous augmentez vos forces et donc vous résistez mieux aux instabilités, et je pense que ceci est comme une loi de la moralité" "Stability is obtained with the force of perfection, because when you become more perfect you increase your strenghts , then you better resist instabilities, and I think this is like a law of Morality" Now as you are noticing i am speaking in my below thoughts about how to make humans more strong and how to make them be in harmony by talking about resourcefulness and by showing them how to be in harmony and how to be happy, so i invite you to read my below thoughts so that to understand, other than that i have just looked at the following video that talks about the philosopher Baruch Spinoza: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8DECD8kK94 So I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i am not in accordance with the philosopher Baruch Spinoza that was a Dutch philosopher of Portuguese Sephardi origin that said that morality is not universal, since i think that i am a smart philosopher that has logically proved that morality is both universal and progressive, so i invite you to read here in my following thoughts of my philosophy so that to notice it: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vlDWhmf-MIM More of my philosophy about Resourcefulness and more.. Here is my new proverb about Resourcefulness that permits you to understand it: "Resourcefulness is one of the most important things, and it is a skill, and the good news is: this skill can be learned and mastered, and resourcefulness is attained only when we combine the resourceful mindset and skills, so we have to filter out some of the most useful resources that help us, and resourcefulness is also to know who/what to look for and what to ask, and when ressourcefulness is attained this becomes an engine that permits you to have hope and to be energetic and to be positive in doing what you are doing, since resourcefulness also permits to easy the jobs for you." More of my philosophy about self-affirmations and Mood freezing |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 28 02:39PM -0700 Hello, More of my philosophy about the ideas of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer and more.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I invite you to read the following article about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer: The Ideas Of Friedrich Nietzsche https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ideas-friedrich-nietzsche-dr-marcel-pflug-mba I think i am a smart philosopher, and i am noticing that the philosophers Friedrich Nietzsche and Arthur Schopenhauer are inferior philosophers, and i will explain as following: Notice in the above article the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche has a problem with morality, and he thought, like the philosopher Spinoza, that morality is not universal and he also thought that since for example for the strong human the good becomes the brave, powerful, rich, and strong, so he thought that the strong human will have the tendency to discriminate the weak people, so then the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche thought that morality was not working, but i think that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche was an inferior philosopher since i think i am a philosopher that is smart and i am explaining that the essence of morality is universal and progressive, read my thoughts below about to understand it, and also i am saying that we have not to as pessimistic as the philosophers Friedrich Nietzsche and Arthur Schopenhauer, since i have just spoken about the value of specialization that gives a self-esteem to the individuals of a society and i am explaining in my below thoughts of my new philosophy how we have to be optimistic about human life, and i invite you to read my below thoughts so that to understand: More of my philosophy about universal Love and beauty.. I think i am smart, and i think i am a wise type of person, Now i can ask the following philosophical questions: Does Love is subjective ? Does Beauty is subjective ? Here is my answer: I think i am smart, and i will say that you have to know how to measure it, so you have to know how to "prioritize" by weights of importance, i mean that that so that to know about beauty, there is two ways of doing it, first there is the inferior way of doing it by looking at beauty superficially , and it becomes an a not exact appearance and a not so good measure, and there is the second way that is like scientific and it is to measure beauty with our smartness, by prioritizing and say that the smartests and wise persons among us have to measure beauty and Love and know if we can calling them beauty and Love and if we can accept them as beauty and Love, so then by measuring it this way with smartness and wisdom we can then say that Love and beauty don't become subjective, and as you have just noticed yesterday i said that Love looks like artificial intelligence, since it needs an action that merits a reward (as Love), and you can know more about it by reading my following new proverb: Here is my new proverb: "We can ask of from where comes the attachment of Love between a mother and her son ? so i think i am smart and i will say that it comes from the fact that it is like a reward, that the son is loving or is being the son and the mother is giving a good reward like giving him more security or giving him food to eat, so as you are noticing that this rule can be applied to consumerism, since you can use the same rule with your consumers in a smart way, for example by giving the impression to your consumers that you take care of there security by learning them with easy or the like, and then the consumers will love you much more and will be attracted by you." So then we can say much more precisely that Love needs an action and its reward (as Love), but there is individual love that is like a process of local optimization and there is universal Love that is a process of global optimization in a society that also can comes with a "margin" that makes us also be a level of tolerance on this or that action. And notice with me that it looks like the optimization of particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial intelligence, since the local local optimization PSO is like the process of individual Love, and the global optimization of PSO is like the process of the global Love in a society, and of course particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial intelligence is like Reinforcement Learning in AI(artificial intelligence), since in PSO in artificial intelligence we have the actions of the members of the population of PSO that searches for the optimal value that are found that are then rewarded by making them the values that optimizes further and further towards the global optimum. And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44 More of my philosophy about the too much individualism of the West.. I invite you to look at the following known psychologist that is talking about self-esteem: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9f3qyNNtpQk So i am smart and i am not in accordance with the psychologist in the above video since he is saying that self-esteem comes from comparing your value with the others in a society, but i think it is a too much individualistic definition, since the value of an individual of a society comes also from the fact that the society also gives a certain level of importance to its parts that are the individuals that constitutes the society and that are specialized in this or that job, and this "specialization" is also important for the society and it has a value in a society, so then the individual has a value and importance in a society that gives him a self-esteem. More of my philosophy about beauty.. I will ask a philosophical question: Is a beautiful women beautiful ? So it depends on if you are a wise man type of person or not.. Since i think that you have not to rush in like a fool and think that that the women that is beautiful is beautiful, since the wise man says that it first needs "wisdom" so that to also appreciate beauty or so that to appreciate pleasures of human life, so i think that the wise man type of person is like the way, so read my following thoughts so that to understand much more clearly: Here is my other just new proverb: "I think i am a wise type of person and i say that happiness comes from an efficient way of thinking or from imagination, and not from reality and not from pleasures of reality or pleasures of life, since reality when you look at it from the more and more details, it comes with too much imperfections, so the efficient way of thinking or of imagination has to not be "complete" detachment like in Taoism or Buddhism , since i think by being complete detachment like in Taoism or buddhism you will make the engine that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection much more weak, so then you have to be like the right dose of detachment that makes you like well balanced so that it makes you appreciate our world much more, and so that it makes you appreciate much more pleasures of life or so that it makes you appreciate much more life, so then it makes you much more happy. And of course it is inherent to my proverb that when you realize that reality, when you look at it from the more and more details, comes with too much imperfections and that you can not change for the better quickly, you become much more wise with much more patience etc. And i will explain more my new philosophy in my next book that will also extend with much more new creative ideas." More of my philosophy of what is Love.. I think Love looks like artificial intelligence, since it needs an action that merits a reward, but i think that you have also to know how to play it smartly and "wisely", but we have not to be pessimistic since i think that the best way to attain Love is by being more and more wisdom so that to become much more wise or wise, since i am really convinced that by being much more wise or wise you will start to appreciate much more human life in a smart way and be much more happy as i am doing it, and you will start to know how to be a wise type of Love as i am doing it, since i think i am a wise type of person. And so that to know more how i am wise, you can also look at my following poems of Love that looks like my personality since i am also a gentleman type of person: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ITE99pf3KHA And since i am saying above that Love looks like the action and its reward in artificial intelligence, you can read more my following thoughts about artificial intelligence so that to understand more: And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44 Here is my new proverb: "We can ask of from where comes the attachment of Love between a mother and her son ? so i think i am smart and i will say that it comes from the fact that it is like a reward, that the son is loving or is being the son and the mother is giving a good reward like giving him more security or giving him food to eat, so as you are noticing that this rule can be applied to consumerism, since you can use the same rule with your consumers in a smart way, for example by giving the impression to your consumers that you take care of there security by learning them with easy or the like, and then the consumers will love you much more and will be attracted by you." You can read all my other proverbs below: More of my philosophy about money and about the meaning and the purpose of human life.. I think i am smart and i say that Money is not a good and powerful engine, since you can be stupid and think that it is a powerful engine, but when you are a smart philosopher like me you will realize that thinking that Money is a powerful engine is like the big mistake that is making the Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu by thinking that the action itself is sufficient as an engine, and read my thoughts below about it, since the question is how to make humans more "strong" and "energetic" and "positive" so that they be pushed forward towards more and more perfection. So this is why i am talking in my new philosophy about those kind of powerful "engines". More of my philosophy about the meaning and the purpose of human life.. I think i am smart, and as you have just noticed i am not speaking in my new philosophy about the belonging to a society or to group with a good purpose, since you can think that the pillars of the meaning of human life are the belonging to a society or group with a good purpose and with a kind of transcendence and such, but i think i am a philosopher and i say it is not the right way, since i think what is the best and right way is to talk about what are the good and powerful "engines" that make you have this good meaning and purpose of human life, this is why you have to read my below thoughts of my philosophy so that to notice my kind of new philosophy and i am extending much more my new philosophy with other much more creative ideas: More of my philosophy about the Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu.. I invite you to look at the following video about the Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu: Let It Go, Ride the Wind | The Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vA7Q8zb1hVU I think i am smart, and i am noticing in the above video that the Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu has a problem, since notice that it says the following: "Lieh Tsu shows us that only when we transcend the duality of life - things like gain and loss, attraction and repulsion, wonderful and awful, we can become truly indifferent, and start acting for no other reason than the action itself." So the problem with this, it is one of the engine, since we have to have a powerful engine that pushes us forward towards more and more perfection, and since the Philosopher Lieh Tzu says that we have to transcend the duality and become truly indifferent, and start acting for no other reason than the action itself, but how can you be pushed forward towards more and more perfection by just the action in itself, so then the engine becomes much more weak, so the Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu is problematic. But my new philosophy below is different, since as you notice in my below proverb that it is not a "complete" detachment and it comes like with the right dose of detachment, since you have to understand more my proverb below, and it is that pleasures of consumerism are not sufficient so that to become happy or much more happy, since it needs from you to change your state of the mind or your kind of thinking so that to attain happiness, and it is why is explaining my new proverb below, so read all my thoughts below so that to understand: More of my philosophy about how to be harmony and how to be happy and more.. I think i am smart, and i say that the philosopher Baruch Spinoza said that the being strong makes you happy and the being weak makes you sad, but so that to be smart, we have to be pragmatic and learn the others the how to be strong, and we have to learn them the how to be harmony in a society and how to be harmony with themselves, so as you are noticing that i am in accordance with the philosopher Baruch Spinoza on the fact that the being strong makes you happy and the being weak makes you sad, and here is my new proverb that talks about it more clearly: Here is my other new proverb in english and french: Voici mon nouveau proverbe en français et en anglais: "La stabilité s'obtient avec la force de la perfection, car quand vous devenez plus parfait vous augmentez vos forces et donc vous résistez mieux aux instabilités, et je pense que ceci est comme une loi de la moralité" "Stability is obtained with the force of perfection, because when you become more perfect you increase your strenghts , then you better resist instabilities, and I think this is like a law of Morality" Now as you are noticing i am speaking in my below thoughts about how to make humans more strong and how to make them be in harmony by talking about resourcefulness and by showing them how to be in harmony and how to be happy, so i invite you to read my below thoughts so that to understand, other than that i have just looked at the following video that talks about the philosopher Baruch Spinoza: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8DECD8kK94 So I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i am not in accordance with the philosopher Baruch Spinoza that was a Dutch philosopher of Portuguese Sephardi origin that said that morality is not universal, since i think that i am a smart philosopher that has logically proved that morality is both universal and progressive, so i invite you to read here in my following thoughts of my philosophy so that to notice it: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vlDWhmf-MIM More of my philosophy about Resourcefulness and more.. Here is my new proverb about Resourcefulness that permits you to understand it: "Resourcefulness is one of the most important things, and it is a skill, and the good news is: this skill can be learned and mastered, and resourcefulness is attained only when we combine the resourceful mindset and skills, so we have to filter out some of the most useful resources that help us, and resourcefulness is also to know who/what to look for and what to ask, and when ressourcefulness is attained this becomes an engine that permits you to have hope and to be energetic and to be positive in doing what you are doing, since resourcefulness also permits to easy the jobs for you." More of my philosophy about self-affirmations and Mood freezing and more.. |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 28 12:39PM -0700 Hello, More of my philosophy about universal Love and beauty.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I think i am smart, and i think i am a wise type of person, Now i can ask the following philosophical questions: Does Love is subjective ? Does Beauty is subjective ? Here is my answer: I think i am smart, and i will say that you have to know how to measure it, so you have to know how to "prioritize" by weights of importance, i mean that that so that to know about beauty, there is two ways of doing it, first there is the inferior way of doing it by looking at beauty superficially , and it becomes an a not exact appearance and a not so good measure, and there is the second way that is like scientific and it is to measure beauty with our smartness, by prioritizing and say that the smartests and wise persons among us have to measure beauty and Love and know if we can calling them beauty and Love and if we can accept them as beauty and Love, so then by measuring it this way with smartness and wisdom we can then say that Love and beauty don't become subjective, and as you have just noticed yesterday i said that Love looks like artificial intelligence, since it needs an action that merits a reward (as Love), and you can know more about it by reading my following new proverb: Here is my new proverb: "We can ask of from where comes the attachment of Love between a mother and her son ? so i think i am smart and i will say that it comes from the fact that it is like a reward, that the son is loving or is being the son and the mother is giving a good reward like giving him more security or giving him food to eat, so as you are noticing that this rule can be applied to consumerism, since you can use the same rule with your consumers in a smart way, for example by giving the impression to your consumers that you take care of there security by learning them with easy or the like, and then the consumers will love you much more and will be attracted by you." So then we can say much more precisely that Love needs an action and its reward (as Love), but there is individual love that is like a process of local optimization and there is universal Love that is a process of global optimization in a society that also can comes with a "margin" that makes us also be a level of tolerance on this or that action. And notice with me that it looks like the optimization of particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial intelligence, since the local local optimization PSO is like the process of individual Love, and the global optimization of PSO is like the process of the global Love in a society, and of course particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial intelligence is like Reinforcement Learning in AI(artificial intelligence), since in PSO in artificial intelligence we have the actions of the members of the population of PSO that searches for the optimal value that are found that are then rewarded by making them the values that optimizes further and further towards the global optimum. And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44 More of my philosophy about the too much individualism of the West.. I invite you to look at the following known psychologist that is talking about self-esteem: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9f3qyNNtpQk So i am smart and i am not in accordance with the psychologist in the above video since he is saying that self-esteem comes from comparing your value with the others in a society, but i think it is a too much individualistic definition, since the value of an individual of a society comes also from the fact that the society also gives a certain level of importance to its parts that are the individuals that constitutes the society and that are specialized in this or that job, and this "specialization" is also important for the society and it has a value in a society, so then the individual has a value and importance in a society that gives him a self-esteem. More of my philosophy about beauty.. I will ask a philosophical question: Is a beautiful women beautiful ? So it depends on if you are a wise man type of person or not.. Since i think that you have not to rush in like a fool and think that that the women that is beautiful is beautiful, since the wise man says that it first needs "wisdom" so that to also appreciate beauty or so that to appreciate pleasures of human life, so i think that the wise man type of person is like the way, so read my following thoughts so that to understand much more clearly: Here is my other just new proverb: "I think i am a wise type of person and i say that happiness comes from an efficient way of thinking or from imagination, and not from reality and not from pleasures of reality or pleasures of life, since reality when you look at it from the more and more details, it comes with too much imperfections, so the efficient way of thinking or of imagination has to not be "complete" detachment like in Taoism or Buddhism , since i think by being complete detachment like in Taoism or buddhism you will make the engine that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection much more weak, so then you have to be like the right dose of detachment that makes you like well balanced so that it makes you appreciate our world much more, and so that it makes you appreciate much more pleasures of life or so that it makes you appreciate much more life, so then it makes you much more happy. And of course it is inherent to my proverb that when you realize that reality, when you look at it from the more and more details, comes with too much imperfections and that you can not change for the better quickly, you become much more wise with much more patience etc. And i will explain more my new philosophy in my next book that will also extend with much more new creative ideas." More of my philosophy of what is Love.. I think Love looks like artificial intelligence, since it needs an action that merits a reward, but i think that you have also to know how to play it smartly and "wisely", but we have not to be pessimistic since i think that the best way to attain Love is by being more and more wisdom so that to become much more wise or wise, since i am really convinced that by being much more wise or wise you will start to appreciate much more human life in a smart way and be much more happy as i am doing it, and you will start to know how to be a wise type of Love as i am doing it, since i think i am a wise type of person. And so that to know more how i am wise, you can also look at my following poems of Love that looks like my personality since i am also a gentleman type of person: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ITE99pf3KHA And since i am saying above that Love looks like the action and its reward in artificial intelligence, you can read more my following thoughts about artificial intelligence so that to understand more: And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44 Here is my new proverb: "We can ask of from where comes the attachment of Love between a mother and her son ? so i think i am smart and i will say that it comes from the fact that it is like a reward, that the son is loving or is being the son and the mother is giving a good reward like giving him more security or giving him food to eat, so as you are noticing that this rule can be applied to consumerism, since you can use the same rule with your consumers in a smart way, for example by giving the impression to your consumers that you take care of there security by learning them with easy or the like, and then the consumers will love you much more and will be attracted by you." You can read all my other proverbs below: More of my philosophy about money and about the meaning and the purpose of human life.. I think i am smart and i say that Money is not a good and powerful engine, since you can be stupid and think that it is a powerful engine, but when you are a smart philosopher like me you will realize that thinking that Money is a powerful engine is like the big mistake that is making the Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu by thinking that the action itself is sufficient as an engine, and read my thoughts below about it, since the question is how to make humans more "strong" and "energetic" and "positive" so that they be pushed forward towards more and more perfection. So this is why i am talking in my new philosophy about those kind of powerful "engines". More of my philosophy about the meaning and the purpose of human life.. I think i am smart, and as you have just noticed i am not speaking in my new philosophy about the belonging to a society or to group with a good purpose, since you can think that the pillars of the meaning of human life are the belonging to a society or group with a good purpose and with a kind of transcendence and such, but i think i am a philosopher and i say it is not the right way, since i think what is the best and right way is to talk about what are the good and powerful "engines" that make you have this good meaning and purpose of human life, this is why you have to read my below thoughts of my philosophy so that to notice my kind of new philosophy and i am extending much more my new philosophy with other much more creative ideas: More of my philosophy about the Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu.. I invite you to look at the following video about the Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu: Let It Go, Ride the Wind | The Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vA7Q8zb1hVU I think i am smart, and i am noticing in the above video that the Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu has a problem, since notice that it says the following: "Lieh Tsu shows us that only when we transcend the duality of life - things like gain and loss, attraction and repulsion, wonderful and awful, we can become truly indifferent, and start acting for no other reason than the action itself." So the problem with this, it is one of the engine, since we have to have a powerful engine that pushes us forward towards more and more perfection, and since the Philosopher Lieh Tzu says that we have to transcend the duality and become truly indifferent, and start acting for no other reason than the action itself, but how can you be pushed forward towards more and more perfection by just the action in itself, so then the engine becomes much more weak, so the Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu is problematic. But my new philosophy below is different, since as you notice in my below proverb that it is not a "complete" detachment and it comes like with the right dose of detachment, since you have to understand more my proverb below, and it is that pleasures of consumerism are not sufficient so that to become happy or much more happy, since it needs from you to change your state of the mind or your kind of thinking so that to attain happiness, and it is why is explaining my new proverb below, so read all my thoughts below so that to understand: More of my philosophy about how to be harmony and how to be happy and more.. I think i am smart, and i say that the philosopher Baruch Spinoza said that the being strong makes you happy and the being weak makes you sad, but so that to be smart, we have to be pragmatic and learn the others the how to be strong, and we have to learn them the how to be harmony in a society and how to be harmony with themselves, so as you are noticing that i am in accordance with the philosopher Baruch Spinoza on the fact that the being strong makes you happy and the being weak makes you sad, and here is my new proverb that talks about it more clearly: Here is my other new proverb in english and french: Voici mon nouveau proverbe en français et en anglais: "La stabilité s'obtient avec la force de la perfection, car quand vous devenez plus parfait vous augmentez vos forces et donc vous résistez mieux aux instabilités, et je pense que ceci est comme une loi de la moralité" "Stability is obtained with the force of perfection, because when you become more perfect you increase your strenghts , then you better resist instabilities, and I think this is like a law of Morality" Now as you are noticing i am speaking in my below thoughts about how to make humans more strong and how to make them be in harmony by talking about resourcefulness and by showing them how to be in harmony and how to be happy, so i invite you to read my below thoughts so that to understand, other than that i have just looked at the following video that talks about the philosopher Baruch Spinoza: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8DECD8kK94 So I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i am not in accordance with the philosopher Baruch Spinoza that was a Dutch philosopher of Portuguese Sephardi origin that said that morality is not universal, since i think that i am a smart philosopher that has logically proved that morality is both universal and progressive, so i invite you to read here in my following thoughts of my philosophy so that to notice it: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vlDWhmf-MIM More of my philosophy about Resourcefulness and more.. Here is my new proverb about Resourcefulness that permits you to understand it: "Resourcefulness is one of the most important things, and it is a skill, and the good news is: this skill can be learned and mastered, and resourcefulness is attained only when we combine the resourceful mindset and skills, so we have to filter out some of the most useful resources that help us, and resourcefulness is also to know who/what to look for and what to ask, and when ressourcefulness is attained this becomes an engine that permits you to have hope and to be energetic and to be positive in doing what you are doing, since resourcefulness also permits to easy the jobs for you." More of my philosophy about self-affirmations and Mood freezing and more.. As you are noticing i am saying that i am smart or i am a wise type of person, and i think it is part of the value of self-affirmations, and it is not that this self-affirmations boost my inner strength and make me likely to succeed, but it is just that i am much more "confident" about me and i also think that i am smart, and read my below thoughts so that to understand more about my personality, also as you are noticing in my below first proverb that i am using a technic that looks like Mood freezing in psychology, since the most important aspect of Mood freezing in psychology it is that it recognizes the true power of the mind, and it is this true power of the mind that interests me, this is why i am using my below technic in my first proverb, since i want to make the others convinced that expressing anger or/and frustration and such in the given context would not make them feel better, so as you have just noticed i am wanting to make the others much better persons by improving their moods etc., so i invite you to read carefully all my thoughts below so that to understand: More of my philosophy about my new philosophy about detachment and more.. In Buddhism the detached mindset is one that realizes the importance of living with the natural flow of things and respecting the impermanence of all life, but in my new philosophy you can realize a kind of detachment by understanding my following new proverb: "I am discovering a pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is that when you look from a higher level layer to humans, like when you look at a beautiful movie or a beautiful song, you can like think that it is a beautiful movie or a beautiful song, but |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment