- More of my philosophy about the Military-Industrial Complex of USA.. - 1 Update
- More of my philosophy about scalability and Gödel's incompleteness theorem and more.. - 1 Update
- How do I look inside an .exe file to view the programming - 2 Updates
- More precision about my philosophy about the beautiful Gunnersbury Writing Desk made of beautiful wood.. - 1 Update
- More of my philosophy about civilization and specialization of our today world.. - 1 Update
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Oct 01 04:25PM -0700 Hello, More of my philosophy about the Military-Industrial Complex of USA.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I have just looked at the following video about the Military-Industrial Complex of USA: Who Rules America: The Rise of The Military-Industrial Complex | Corporations | ENDEVR Documentary https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nTx_Pi1x9Q I think i am smart, and i am not in accordance with the above video, since i think that USA is a "rich" and "powerful" country that doesn't need to dominate the other countries, but i think that USA is also like a police man of the world since it is rich and powerful and it can sometime maintain world order if the world disorder becomes dangerous and/or too risky, so i am a wise type of person that says that we have to be more optimistic, since i think that we have to become much more wise or wise so that to be able to efficiently manage our world, and as you just noticed that i have just said that we have to be more optimistic, since read my following writing about globalization so that to notice it: More philosophy about Globalization.. I think that globalization is a good thing, but you have to be smart and know how to take advantage of it, so i invite you to read the following about the positive effects of Globalization on developing countries such as: 1- Globalization has permitted developed nations to invest in less developed nations which has lead to creation of jobs for poor people. 2- The health and education system in developing countries has benefited in a positive way due to the contribution of globalization. So i invite you to read the following article to notice it: The effects of Globalization on developing countries Read more here: https://medium.com/@BonillaXM/the-effects-of-globalization-on-developing-countries-1e465257c400 And read my following interesting writing about Income Inequality in capitalism: Capitalism is the Solution to Income Inequality, Says Gannon Lecturer "Free enterprise can work. The profit motive is very effective. But the profits have to be channeled the right way. You have to share the pie. Let free enterprise create a bigger and bigger pie, but then make sure you share the bounty. … It has worked before and it can work again." Read more here: https://news.fordham.edu/business-and-economics/capitalism-is-the-solution-to-income-inequality-says-gannon-lecturer/ More of my philosophy about scalability and Gödel's incompleteness theorem and more.. Gödel's incompleteness theorem in mathematics only applies to sufficiently strong systems. It is not applicable to systems like Presburger arithmetic and first-order logic. But FOL(First-order logic) in mathematics is not all-powerful by any means, and it has the following disadvantages: 1- It has no concept of time 2- hard to do arithmetic 3- Can't do beliefs --"If he believes this then surely he must believe that" is often wrong in everyday life; also surprising mathematical results. 4- Can't have variables with set values: "All functions are boring" turns out to be a 2nd-order, not 1st-order statement. So first-order logic is not scalable, so i think we can not avoid the problem of Gödel's incompleteness theorem in mathematics, but notice that the Gödel's incompleteness theorem in mathematics says the following: "For any such consistent formal system, there will always be statements about natural numbers that are true, but that are unprovable within the system. The second incompleteness theorem, an extension of the first, shows that the system cannot demonstrate its own consistency." So notice carefully that it says that there will always exist in those systems statements that are "true" that we can not prove, so then we can not demonstrate the consistency of those systems, but i think that those systems remain "really" "useful" for us. More of my philosophy about civilization and specialization of our today world.. Here is my new proverb: "I think what is happening in the West and other parts of the world, it is that individuals are becoming too stupid, since it is the way of specialization that is required, since the individuals are specialized in there jobs so that to enhance much more the efficiency and productivity as a society or as group, but this specialization is a weakness that is making individuals too stupid, but we can become smart working as a group or as a society using the tools of internet etc." I think i am smart and here is my new proverb: "The most important disadvantage of education today, it is that we are learning the students, but we are neglecting to efficiently learn to students how to learn." This is one of the basis of my philosophy below, and read about it in my following thoughts: I think i am smart, and i think you can be more confident with me, since i think i am not too specialized(Since you have to read my below proverb about it), since here is what i have done: 1- I have gotten my university level Diploma in Microelectronics and informatics. 2- I have studied 1 year of applied mathematics at university of Montreal Canada and i have succeeded it. 3- I have also studied operational research 4- I have also studied network administration and i have worked as a network administrator 5- I am also an inventor of many scalable algorithms and algorithms and i have invented some powerful software tools for parallelism. 6- I have studied more web software development with Perl, Javascript and CGI and FCGI and ODBC using SQL etc. and i have worked in the past as a web software developer. 7- I have worked as a software developer consultant etc. etc. You can read more about my education and my way of doing here: And here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms: https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k I invite you to look at the following beautiful photo Gunnersbury Writing Desk in a beautiful wood: https://www.wayfair.ca/furniture/pdp/astoria-grand-gunnersbury-writing-desk-astg6385.html So i think i am smart, and when i look at the above photo of this beautiful Gunnersbury Writing Desk made of beautiful wood, it is like an efficient philosophy for me, since i am seeing the pattern with my fluid intelligence, since having this Gunnersbury Writing Desk in a beautiful wood, it is like living near the beautiful of the mother nature, and it is like an abstraction or it is like an efficient simple language, since it is like we are bringing the beautiful of mother nature like a beautiful tree made of beautiful wood into our house, so it makes our house really beautiful and it makes us more happy, here is some photos of them: https://www.thecoolist.com/most-beautiful-trees/ So this kind of philosophy is like using smartly a "lever" to move a heavy or firmly fixed load, since as you notice that when you have this beautiful Gunnersbury Writing Desk made of beautiful wood, you are not bringing all a beautiful forest of beautiful trees made of wood or all a beautiful tree made of wood of mother into your house, so it permits you to like easily lift your problems and solve them and be much more happy, and i think it is the right philosophy, since so that to be much more happy you have to know how to efficiently find those kind of simple levers that permits you to be much more happy and use them smartly, and here is another lever that can be made simple that you can use smartly, read about it in my following proverb: "Resourcefulness is one of the most important things, and it is a skill, and the good news is: this skill can be learned and mastered, and resourcefulness is attained only when we combine the resourceful mindset and skills, so we have to filter out some of the most useful resources that help us, and resourcefulness is also to know who/what to look for and what to ask, and when ressourcefulness is attained this becomes an engine that permits you to have hope and to be energetic and to be positive in doing what you are doing, since resourcefulness also permits to easy the jobs for you." So i think when you understand this smart philosophy you will understand that using an efficient simple language is also very efficient. More of my philosophy about technology and mother nature.. I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that i am also an smart artist, and i invite you to look and listen at the following video of a music of Jean-Michel Jarre: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSIMVnPA994 So i think i am a smart artist, and i am noticing a smart pattern with my fluid intelligence in the above music and video of Jean-Michel Jarre, so the pattern is that the above music of Jean-Michel Jarre is not complete detachment from the beauty of mother nature, since he is using a mixture of the beautiful of mother nature(like the wind or the water as electronic sounds) and the beautiful of electronic music that is detached from the mother nature, and i think that humans needs and require the two, the beautifulness of mother nature and the beautifulness of electronic music or digital photos and such that are detached from the beautiful of mother nature, so the beautiful of mother nature is essential for humans, i will give you a quick example so that to notice it: I invite you to listen at the following beautiful arab song from Algeria: Ch'hal aâyit mesbar https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zS6KG2ybOB0&list=RDzS6KG2ybOB0&start_radio=1 And notice how in this beautiful arab music they are using old music instruments that give beautiful sounds and music that comes from the beautiful of mother nature or that are much nearer from the mother nature than electronic music sounds, so then i think that this arab music and song is like the beautiful of mother nature. And as i have just said that the beautiful of mother nature is essential for humans, so i think that there is a difference between my following poems of Love and mathematics, since mathematics is like far away from the beautiful of mother nature, it is like robots, but my poems of Love are like the beautiful of mother nature, here they are, read them all carefully: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/D4qlWWW-o1s And about extremist ideologies like white supremacism, i invite you to read my following thoughts about them: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ More of philosophy about Democracy and the Evolutionary Design methodology.. I will make a logical analogy between software projects and Democracy, first i will say that because of the today big complexity of software projects, so the "requirements" of those complex software projects are not clear and a lot could change in them, so this is why we are using an Evolutionary Design methodology with different tools such as Unit Testing, Test Driven Development, Design Patterns, Continuous Integration, Domain Driven Design, but we have to notice carefully that an important thing in Evolutionary Design methodology is that when those complex software projects grow, we have first to normalize there growth by ensuring that the complex software projects grow "nicely" and "balanced" by using standards, and second we have to optimize growth of the complex software projects by balancing between the criteria of the easy to change the complex software projects and the performance of the complex software projects, and third you have to maximize the growth of the complex software projects by making the most out of each optimization, and i think that by logical analogy we can notice that in Democracy we have also to normalize the growth by not allowing "extremism" or extremist ideologies that hurt Democracy, and we have also to optimize Democracy by for example well balancing between "performance" of the society and in the Democracy and the "reliability" of helping others like the weakest members of the society among the people that of course respect the laws, and so that to understand more my thoughts of my philosophy about Democracy, i invite you to read them here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vlDWhmf-MIM And about extremist ideologies like white supremacism, i invite you to read my following thoughts about them: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ More of my philosophy about entropy and about how morality is universal.. I think i am smart, and i am explaining below why morality is universal, but as you have just noticed i have just said that so that to say that morality is universal, it requires from us to know about the requirements such as why to be a global world etc., so there must be a level of consciousness, other than that i will make you feel and see much more that morality is universal since i am seeing it: So take for example the human imperfections or world imperfections, i say that it is because we have those imperfections that also we have morality, and those imperfections causes entropy(A state of disorder and disorganization), this is why we have to be more and more perfection so that to maintain order and so that to attain perfection of being much more perfect or perfect, for example humans are working in there everyday life so that to also maintain order or so that to become perfection or much more perfection, and maintaining order is also that we are perfectioning so that to not to become disorder. More of my philosophy about why morality is universal.. I think i am a smart philosopher, and i will now explain why morality is universal: So take a look at the thing that we call "time", so you can naively look at our everyday life and say that time is not relative, but you can like Einstein analyse it and prove that time is relative, and morality is the same, so when you naively look at it you will think that morality is relative, since you can notice that for example there is many countries with many laws and rules, but when you analyse it you will notice that the goal of morality that we become perfect or much more perfect pushes us forward towards more and more perfection since we have to solve our problems such as our many imperfections, it is also why morality is "progressive", so then the essence of morality become that morality is progressing towards the goal that is that we become perfect or much more perfect, so then the other details of morality are abstracted, so then those acts of humans perfectioning or perfecting towards a much more perfect world or perfect world and that are also codified as morality become that morality is universal, since also we can take this essence of morality as the most important thing. More of my philosophy about the superhuman of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche.. I think i am smart philosopher, and i will be more precise in my logical proof of why the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche believed, like the philosopher Spinoza, that morality is not universal, so notice carefully how the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche has wanted to construct a new type of man that is a superhuman in his view and this superhuman in the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a superhuman that has mastery over his emotions and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply existing, so as you are noticing that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is an inferior philosopher since he wanted to apply the morality of the strong to the morality of the weak in not wise manner, also you can notice it more by him saying the following and recognizing that there is different types of morals, and here is his saying: "It is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the slaves or the weak." |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Oct 01 03:13PM -0700 Hello, More of my philosophy about scalability and Gödel's incompleteness theorem and more.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. Gödel's incompleteness theorem in mathematics only applies to sufficiently strong systems. It is not applicable to systems like Presburger arithmetic and first-order logic. But FOL(First-order logic) in mathematics is not all-powerful by any means, and it has the following disadvantages: 1- It has no concept of time 2- hard to do arithmetic 3- Can't do beliefs --"If he believes this then surely he must believe that" is often wrong in everyday life; also surprising mathematical results. 4- Can't have variables with set values: "All functions are boring" turns out to be a 2nd-order, not 1st-order statement. So first-order logic is not scalable, so i think we can not avoid the problem of Gödel's incompleteness theorem in mathematics, but notice that the Gödel's incompleteness theorem in mathematics says the following: "For any such consistent formal system, there will always be statements about natural numbers that are true, but that are unprovable within the system. The second incompleteness theorem, an extension of the first, shows that the system cannot demonstrate its own consistency." So notice carefully that it says that there will always exist in those systems statements that are "true" that we can not prove, so then we can not demonstrate the consistency of those systems, but i think that those systems remain "really" "useful" for us. More of my philosophy about civilization and specialization of our today world.. Here is my new proverb: "I think what is happening in the West and other parts of the world, it is that individuals are becoming too stupid, since it is the way of specialization that is required, since the individuals are specialized in there jobs so that to enhance much more the efficiency and productivity as a society or as group, but this specialization is a weakness that is making individuals too stupid, but we can become smart working as a group or as a society using the tools of internet etc." I think i am smart and here is my new proverb: "The most important disadvantage of education today, it is that we are learning the students, but we are neglecting to efficiently learn to students how to learn." This is one of the basis of my philosophy below, and read about it in my following thoughts: I think i am smart, and i think you can be more confident with me, since i think i am not too specialized(Since you have to read my below proverb about it), since here is what i have done: 1- I have gotten my university level Diploma in Microelectronics and informatics. 2- I have studied 1 year of applied mathematics at university of Montreal Canada and i have succeeded it. 3- I have also studied operational research 4- I have also studied network administration and i have worked as a network administrator 5- I am also an inventor of many scalable algorithms and algorithms and i have invented some powerful software tools for parallelism. 6- I have studied more web software development with Perl, Javascript and CGI and FCGI and ODBC using SQL etc. and i have worked in the past as a web software developer. 7- I have worked as a software developer consultant etc. etc. You can read more about my education and my way of doing here: And here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms: https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k I invite you to look at the following beautiful photo Gunnersbury Writing Desk in a beautiful wood: https://www.wayfair.ca/furniture/pdp/astoria-grand-gunnersbury-writing-desk-astg6385.html So i think i am smart, and when i look at the above photo of this beautiful Gunnersbury Writing Desk made of beautiful wood, it is like an efficient philosophy for me, since i am seeing the pattern with my fluid intelligence, since having this Gunnersbury Writing Desk in a beautiful wood, it is like living near the beautiful of the mother nature, and it is like an abstraction or it is like an efficient simple language, since it is like we are bringing the beautiful of mother nature like a beautiful tree made of beautiful wood into our house, so it makes our house really beautiful and it makes us more happy, here is some photos of them: https://www.thecoolist.com/most-beautiful-trees/ So this kind of philosophy is like using smartly a "lever" to move a heavy or firmly fixed load, since as you notice that when you have this beautiful Gunnersbury Writing Desk made of beautiful wood, you are not bringing all a beautiful forest of beautiful trees made of wood or all a beautiful tree made of wood of mother into your house, so it permits you to like easily lift your problems and solve them and be much more happy, and i think it is the right philosophy, since so that to be much more happy you have to know how to efficiently find those kind of simple levers that permits you to be much more happy and use them smartly, and here is another lever that can be made simple that you can use smartly, read about it in my following proverb: "Resourcefulness is one of the most important things, and it is a skill, and the good news is: this skill can be learned and mastered, and resourcefulness is attained only when we combine the resourceful mindset and skills, so we have to filter out some of the most useful resources that help us, and resourcefulness is also to know who/what to look for and what to ask, and when ressourcefulness is attained this becomes an engine that permits you to have hope and to be energetic and to be positive in doing what you are doing, since resourcefulness also permits to easy the jobs for you." So i think when you understand this smart philosophy you will understand that using an efficient simple language is also very efficient. More of my philosophy about technology and mother nature.. I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that i am also an smart artist, and i invite you to look and listen at the following video of a music of Jean-Michel Jarre: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSIMVnPA994 So i think i am a smart artist, and i am noticing a smart pattern with my fluid intelligence in the above music and video of Jean-Michel Jarre, so the pattern is that the above music of Jean-Michel Jarre is not complete detachment from the beauty of mother nature, since he is using a mixture of the beautiful of mother nature(like the wind or the water as electronic sounds) and the beautiful of electronic music that is detached from the mother nature, and i think that humans needs and require the two, the beautifulness of mother nature and the beautifulness of electronic music or digital photos and such that are detached from the beautiful of mother nature, so the beautiful of mother nature is essential for humans, i will give you a quick example so that to notice it: I invite you to listen at the following beautiful arab song from Algeria: Ch'hal aâyit mesbar https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zS6KG2ybOB0&list=RDzS6KG2ybOB0&start_radio=1 And notice how in this beautiful arab music they are using old music instruments that give beautiful sounds and music that comes from the beautiful of mother nature or that are much nearer from the mother nature than electronic music sounds, so then i think that this arab music and song is like the beautiful of mother nature. And as i have just said that the beautiful of mother nature is essential for humans, so i think that there is a difference between my following poems of Love and mathematics, since mathematics is like far away from the beautiful of mother nature, it is like robots, but my poems of Love are like the beautiful of mother nature, here they are, read them all carefully: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/D4qlWWW-o1s And about extremist ideologies like white supremacism, i invite you to read my following thoughts about them: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ More of philosophy about Democracy and the Evolutionary Design methodology.. I will make a logical analogy between software projects and Democracy, first i will say that because of the today big complexity of software projects, so the "requirements" of those complex software projects are not clear and a lot could change in them, so this is why we are using an Evolutionary Design methodology with different tools such as Unit Testing, Test Driven Development, Design Patterns, Continuous Integration, Domain Driven Design, but we have to notice carefully that an important thing in Evolutionary Design methodology is that when those complex software projects grow, we have first to normalize there growth by ensuring that the complex software projects grow "nicely" and "balanced" by using standards, and second we have to optimize growth of the complex software projects by balancing between the criteria of the easy to change the complex software projects and the performance of the complex software projects, and third you have to maximize the growth of the complex software projects by making the most out of each optimization, and i think that by logical analogy we can notice that in Democracy we have also to normalize the growth by not allowing "extremism" or extremist ideologies that hurt Democracy, and we have also to optimize Democracy by for example well balancing between "performance" of the society and in the Democracy and the "reliability" of helping others like the weakest members of the society among the people that of course respect the laws, and so that to understand more my thoughts of my philosophy about Democracy, i invite you to read them here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vlDWhmf-MIM And about extremist ideologies like white supremacism, i invite you to read my following thoughts about them: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ More of my philosophy about entropy and about how morality is universal.. I think i am smart, and i am explaining below why morality is universal, but as you have just noticed i have just said that so that to say that morality is universal, it requires from us to know about the requirements such as why to be a global world etc., so there must be a level of consciousness, other than that i will make you feel and see much more that morality is universal since i am seeing it: So take for example the human imperfections or world imperfections, i say that it is because we have those imperfections that also we have morality, and those imperfections causes entropy(A state of disorder and disorganization), this is why we have to be more and more perfection so that to maintain order and so that to attain perfection of being much more perfect or perfect, for example humans are working in there everyday life so that to also maintain order or so that to become perfection or much more perfection, and maintaining order is also that we are perfectioning so that to not to become disorder. More of my philosophy about why morality is universal.. I think i am a smart philosopher, and i will now explain why morality is universal: So take a look at the thing that we call "time", so you can naively look at our everyday life and say that time is not relative, but you can like Einstein analyse it and prove that time is relative, and morality is the same, so when you naively look at it you will think that morality is relative, since you can notice that for example there is many countries with many laws and rules, but when you analyse it you will notice that the goal of morality that we become perfect or much more perfect pushes us forward towards more and more perfection since we have to solve our problems such as our many imperfections, it is also why morality is "progressive", so then the essence of morality become that morality is progressing towards the goal that is that we become perfect or much more perfect, so then the other details of morality are abstracted, so then those acts of humans perfectioning or perfecting towards a much more perfect world or perfect world and that are also codified as morality become that morality is universal, since also we can take this essence of morality as the most important thing. More of my philosophy about the superhuman of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche.. I think i am smart philosopher, and i will be more precise in my logical proof of why the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche believed, like the philosopher Spinoza, that morality is not universal, so notice carefully how the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche has wanted to construct a new type of man that is a superhuman in his view and this superhuman in the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a superhuman that has mastery over his emotions and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply existing, so as you are noticing that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is an inferior philosopher since he wanted to apply the morality of the strong to the morality of the weak in not wise manner, also you can notice it more by him saying the following and recognizing that there is different types of morals, and here is his saying: "It is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the slaves or the weak." That means in french: "C'est la volonté de puissance qui doit s'exprimer, non pas la morale des esclaves ou des faibles.", So the above saying of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is a proof that he recognized that there is different kinds of morals like the morals of the slaves or the weak and morals of the strong humans or the strong. Read more my following thoughts about it and about Stoicism and existentialism and about how i am explaining that the essence of morality is universal: More of my philosophy about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and more.. I have just looked at the following video about: NIETZSCHE - L'exaltation de la vie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeVVtxlg_oE I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that the philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not good, since he says that: "C'est la volonté de puissance qui doit s'exprimer, non pas la morale des esclaves ou des faibles.", that means in english: "It is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the slaves or the weak.", and he said that it needs to construct a new man that we call the superhuman, but I think that i am a philosopher that is smart and i am understanding the philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, and i think that it is an inferior philosophy, because it seeks to construct the superhumans from humans and this superhuman in the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a superhuman that has mastery over his emotions and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply existing, so as you are noticing that it is an inferior philosophy, because how can you be able to take joy in simply existing ? so as you are noticing it is illogical and it is as illogical as Stoicism(read my below thoughts about Stoicism) and i think that it is a violent philosophy as Stoicism, this is why the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsch is a failure as Stoicism, and here is what i said about Stoicism: More of my philosophy about my philosophy and about Stoicism and Existentialism.. I invite you to read this very interesting article about philosophy: Why philosophers could be the ones to transform your 2020 https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20200114-why-philosophers-could-be-the-ones-to-transform-your-2020 And notice that it says the following: "The Stoics suggest that what's most |
| Victor Stark <1fatherslove@gmail.com>: Oct 01 07:11AM -0700 > How i can see the script of a .exe file? i have the permissions to see it but idk how to do that I had the same question so thank you to all the respectful answers. As for the first smart*ss answeres...You got owned! |
| Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com>: Oct 01 06:14PM >> but idk how to do that > I had the same question so thank you to all the respectful answers. As for > the first smart*ss answeres...You got owned! Own me ! To look inside file use vim! -- 7-77-777 Evil Sinner! |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Oct 01 05:22AM -0700 Hello, More precision about my philosophy about the beautiful Gunnersbury Writing Desk made of beautiful wood.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I have just brought more precision in my thoughts of philosophy below about the beautiful Gunnersbury Writing Desk made of beautiful wood, read it again: More of my philosophy about civilization and specialization of our today world.. Here is my new corrected proverb, read it again: "I think what is happening in the West and other parts of the world, it is that individuals are becoming too stupid, since it is the way of specialization that is required, since the individuals are specialized in there jobs so that to enhance much more the efficiency and productivity as a society or as group, but this specialization is a weakness that is making individuals too stupid, but we can become smart working as a group or as a society using the tools of internet etc." I think i am smart and here is my new proverb: "The most important disadvantage of education today, it is that we are learning the students, but we are neglecting to efficiently learn to students how to learn." This is one of the basis of my philosophy below, and read about it in my following thoughts: I think i am smart, and i think you can be more confident with me, since i think i am not too specialized(Since you have to read my below proverb about it), since here is what i have done: 1- I have gotten my university level Diploma in Microelectronics and informatics. 2- I have studied 1 year of applied mathematics at university of Montreal Canada and i have succeeded it. 3- I have also studied operational research 4- I have also studied network administration and i have worked as a network administrator 5- I am also an inventor of many scalable algorithms and algorithms and i have invented some powerful software tools for parallelism. 6- I have studied more web software development with Perl, Javascript and CGI and FCGI and ODBC using SQL etc. and i have worked in the past as a web software developer. 7- I have worked as a software developer consultant etc. etc. You can read more about my education and my way of doing here: And here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms: https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k I invite you to look at the following beautiful photo Gunnersbury Writing Desk in a beautiful wood: https://www.wayfair.ca/furniture/pdp/astoria-grand-gunnersbury-writing-desk-astg6385.html So i think i am smart, and when i look at the above photo of this beautiful Gunnersbury Writing Desk made of beautiful wood, it is like an efficient philosophy for me, since i am seeing the pattern with my fluid intelligence, since having this Gunnersbury Writing Desk in a beautiful wood, it is like living near the beautiful of the mother nature, and it is like an abstraction or it is like an efficient simple language, since it is like we are bringing the beautiful of mother nature like a beautiful tree made of beautiful wood into our house, so it makes our house really beautiful and it makes us more happy, here is some photos of them: https://www.thecoolist.com/most-beautiful-trees/ So this kind of philosophy is like using smartly a "lever" to move a heavy or firmly fixed load, since as you notice that when you have this beautiful Gunnersbury Writing Desk made of beautiful wood, you are not bringing all a beautiful forest of beautiful trees made of wood or all a beautiful tree made of wood of mother into your house, so it permits you to like easily lift your problems and solve them and be much more happy, and i think it is the right philosophy, since so that to be much more happy you have to know how to efficiently find those kind of simple levers that permits you to be much more happy and use them smartly, and here is another lever that can be made simple that you can use smartly, read about it in my following proverb: "Resourcefulness is one of the most important things, and it is a skill, and the good news is: this skill can be learned and mastered, and resourcefulness is attained only when we combine the resourceful mindset and skills, so we have to filter out some of the most useful resources that help us, and resourcefulness is also to know who/what to look for and what to ask, and when ressourcefulness is attained this becomes an engine that permits you to have hope and to be energetic and to be positive in doing what you are doing, since resourcefulness also permits to easy the jobs for you." So i think when you understand this smart philosophy you will understand that using an efficient simple language is also very efficient. More of my philosophy about technology and mother nature.. I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that i am also an smart artist, and i invite you to look and listen at the following video of a music of Jean-Michel Jarre: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSIMVnPA994 So i think i am a smart artist, and i am noticing a smart pattern with my fluid intelligence in the above music and video of Jean-Michel Jarre, so the pattern is that the above music of Jean-Michel Jarre is not complete detachment from the beauty of mother nature, since he is using a mixture of the beautiful of mother nature(like the wind or the water as electronic sounds) and the beautiful of electronic music that is detached from the mother nature, and i think that humans needs and require the two, the beautifulness of mother nature and the beautifulness of electronic music or digital photos and such that are detached from the beautiful of mother nature, so the beautiful of mother nature is essential for humans, i will give you a quick example so that to notice it: I invite you to listen at the following beautiful arab song from Algeria: Ch'hal aâyit mesbar https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zS6KG2ybOB0&list=RDzS6KG2ybOB0&start_radio=1 And notice how in this beautiful arab music they are using old music instruments that give beautiful sounds and music that comes from the beautiful of mother nature or that are much nearer from the mother nature than electronic music sounds, so then i think that this arab music and song is like the beautiful of mother nature. And as i have just said that the beautiful of mother nature is essential for humans, so i think that there is a difference between my following poems of Love and mathematics, since mathematics is like far away from the beautiful of mother nature, it is like robots, but my poems of Love are like the beautiful of mother nature, here they are, read them all carefully: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/D4qlWWW-o1s And about extremist ideologies like white supremacism, i invite you to read my following thoughts about them: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ More of philosophy about Democracy and the Evolutionary Design methodology.. I will make a logical analogy between software projects and Democracy, first i will say that because of the today big complexity of software projects, so the "requirements" of those complex software projects are not clear and a lot could change in them, so this is why we are using an Evolutionary Design methodology with different tools such as Unit Testing, Test Driven Development, Design Patterns, Continuous Integration, Domain Driven Design, but we have to notice carefully that an important thing in Evolutionary Design methodology is that when those complex software projects grow, we have first to normalize there growth by ensuring that the complex software projects grow "nicely" and "balanced" by using standards, and second we have to optimize growth of the complex software projects by balancing between the criteria of the easy to change the complex software projects and the performance of the complex software projects, and third you have to maximize the growth of the complex software projects by making the most out of each optimization, and i think that by logical analogy we can notice that in Democracy we have also to normalize the growth by not allowing "extremism" or extremist ideologies that hurt Democracy, and we have also to optimize Democracy by for example well balancing between "performance" of the society and in the Democracy and the "reliability" of helping others like the weakest members of the society among the people that of course respect the laws, and so that to understand more my thoughts of my philosophy about Democracy, i invite you to read them here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vlDWhmf-MIM And about extremist ideologies like white supremacism, i invite you to read my following thoughts about them: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ More of my philosophy about entropy and about how morality is universal.. I think i am smart, and i am explaining below why morality is universal, but as you have just noticed i have just said that so that to say that morality is universal, it requires from us to know about the requirements such as why to be a global world etc., so there must be a level of consciousness, other than that i will make you feel and see much more that morality is universal since i am seeing it: So take for example the human imperfections or world imperfections, i say that it is because we have those imperfections that also we have morality, and those imperfections causes entropy(A state of disorder and disorganization), this is why we have to be more and more perfection so that to maintain order and so that to attain perfection of being much more perfect or perfect, for example humans are working in there everyday life so that to also maintain order or so that to become perfection or much more perfection, and maintaining order is also that we are perfectioning so that to not to become disorder. More of my philosophy about why morality is universal.. I think i am a smart philosopher, and i will now explain why morality is universal: So take a look at the thing that we call "time", so you can naively look at our everyday life and say that time is not relative, but you can like Einstein analyse it and prove that time is relative, and morality is the same, so when you naively look at it you will think that morality is relative, since you can notice that for example there is many countries with many laws and rules, but when you analyse it you will notice that the goal of morality that we become perfect or much more perfect pushes us forward towards more and more perfection since we have to solve our problems such as our many imperfections, it is also why morality is "progressive", so then the essence of morality become that morality is progressing towards the goal that is that we become perfect or much more perfect, so then the other details of morality are abstracted, so then those acts of humans perfectioning or perfecting towards a much more perfect world or perfect world and that are also codified as morality become that morality is universal, since also we can take this essence of morality as the most important thing. More of my philosophy about the superhuman of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche.. I think i am smart philosopher, and i will be more precise in my logical proof of why the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche believed, like the philosopher Spinoza, that morality is not universal, so notice carefully how the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche has wanted to construct a new type of man that is a superhuman in his view and this superhuman in the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a superhuman that has mastery over his emotions and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply existing, so as you are noticing that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is an inferior philosopher since he wanted to apply the morality of the strong to the morality of the weak in not wise manner, also you can notice it more by him saying the following and recognizing that there is different types of morals, and here is his saying: "It is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the slaves or the weak." That means in french: "C'est la volonté de puissance qui doit s'exprimer, non pas la morale des esclaves ou des faibles.", So the above saying of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is a proof that he recognized that there is different kinds of morals like the morals of the slaves or the weak and morals of the strong humans or the strong. Read more my following thoughts about it and about Stoicism and existentialism and about how i am explaining that the essence of morality is universal: More of my philosophy about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and more.. I have just looked at the following video about: NIETZSCHE - L'exaltation de la vie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeVVtxlg_oE I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that the philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not good, since he says that: "C'est la volonté de puissance qui doit s'exprimer, non pas la morale des esclaves ou des faibles.", that means in english: "It is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the slaves or the weak.", and he said that it needs to construct a new man that we call the superhuman, but I think that i am a philosopher that is smart and i am understanding the philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, and i think that it is an inferior philosophy, because it seeks to construct the superhumans from humans and this superhuman in the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a superhuman that has mastery over his emotions and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply existing, so as you are noticing that it is an inferior philosophy, because how can you be able to take joy in simply existing ? so as you are noticing it is illogical and it is as illogical as Stoicism(read my below thoughts about Stoicism) and i think that it is a violent philosophy as Stoicism, this is why the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsch is a failure as Stoicism, and here is what i said about Stoicism: More of my philosophy about my philosophy and about Stoicism and Existentialism.. I invite you to read this very interesting article about philosophy: Why philosophers could be the ones to transform your 2020 https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20200114-why-philosophers-could-be-the-ones-to-transform-your-2020 And notice that it says the following: "The Stoics suggest that what's most important in order to lead a good life is internal rather than external. It's about developing the right character, the right state of mind," I think i am a philosopher that is "smart", so i make you notice the logical bug in the above saying about Stoicism, and it is that developing the right character and the right state of the mind in Stoicism needs the cultural side that also comes from the external reality and hence from the "purpose" and the "meaning of life", and we can notice that Stoicism is not so smart, because how can we develop self-control and fortitude as a means of overcoming destructive emotions and such without the necessary requirements that have to give enough hope or a meaning of life that gives the necessary self-control and fortitude? so this is why i think that Stoicism as a philosophy is a failure, so what's about existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre ? Jean-Paul Sartre said that: "Existence precedes essence" or in french: "L'existence précède l'essence", and it is the central claim of existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, but i think that this claim is not so logical, since it is like a debate that asks the |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Oct 01 05:08AM -0700 Hello, More of my philosophy about civilization and specialization of our today world.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. Here is my new corrected proverb, read it again: "I think what is happening in the West and other parts of the world, it is that individuals are becoming too stupid, since it is the way of specialization that is required, since the individuals are specialized in there jobs so that to enhance much more the efficiency and productivity as a society or as group, but this specialization is a weakness that is making individuals too stupid, but we can become smart working as group or as society using the tools of internet etc." I think i am smart and here is my new proverb: "The most important disadvantage of education today, it is that we are learning the students, but we are neglecting to efficiently learn to students how to learn." This is one of the basis of my philosophy below, and read about it in my following thoughts: I think i am smart, and i think you can be more confident with me, since i think i am not too specialized(Since you have to read my below proverb about it), since here is what i have done: 1- I have gotten my university level Diploma in Microelectronics and informatics. 2- I have studied 1 year of applied mathematics at university of Montreal Canada and i have succeeded it. 3- I have also studied operational research 4- I have also studied network administration and i have worked as a network administrator 5- I am also an inventor of many scalable algorithms and algorithms and i have invented some powerful software tools for parallelism. 6- I have studied more web software development with Perl, Javascript and CGI and FCGI and ODBC using SQL etc. and i have worked in the past as a web software developer. 7- I have worked as a software developer consultant etc. etc. You can read more about my education and my way of doing here: And here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms: https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k I invite you to look at the following beautiful photo Gunnersbury Writing Desk in a beautiful wood: https://www.wayfair.ca/furniture/pdp/astoria-grand-gunnersbury-writing-desk-astg6385.html So i think i am smart, and when i look at the above photo of this beautiful Gunnersbury Writing Desk made of beautiful wood, it is like an efficient philosophy for me, since i am seeing the pattern with my fluid intelligence, since it is like living near the beautiful of the mother nature, and it is like an abstraction or it is like an efficient simple language, since it is like we are bringing the beautiful of mother nature like a beautiful tree made of beautiful wood into our house, so it makes our house really beautiful and it makes us more happy, here is some photos of them: https://www.thecoolist.com/most-beautiful-trees/ So this kind of philosophy is like using smartly a "lever" to move a heavy or firmly fixed load, since as you notice you are not bringing all a beautiful forest of beautiful trees made of wood or all a beautiful tree made of wood of mother into your house, so it permits you to like easily lift your problems and solve them and be much more happy, and i think it is the right philosophy, since so that to be much more happy you have to know how to efficiently find those kind of simple levers that permits you to be much more happy and use them smartly, and here is another lever that can be made simple that you can use smartly, read about it in my following proverb: "Resourcefulness is one of the most important things, and it is a skill, and the good news is: this skill can be learned and mastered, and resourcefulness is attained only when we combine the resourceful mindset and skills, so we have to filter out some of the most useful resources that help us, and resourcefulness is also to know who/what to look for and what to ask, and when ressourcefulness is attained this becomes an engine that permits you to have hope and to be energetic and to be positive in doing what you are doing, since resourcefulness also permits to easy the jobs for you." So i think when you understand this smart philosophy you will understand that using an efficient simple language is also very efficient. More of my philosophy about technology and mother nature.. I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that i am also an smart artist, and i invite you to look and listen at the following video of a music of Jean-Michel Jarre: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSIMVnPA994 So i think i am a smart artist, and i am noticing a smart pattern with my fluid intelligence in the above music and video of Jean-Michel Jarre, so the pattern is that the above music of Jean-Michel Jarre is not complete detachment from the beauty of mother nature, since he is using a mixture of the beautiful of mother nature(like the wind or the water as electronic sounds) and the beautiful of electronic music that is detached from the mother nature, and i think that humans needs and require the two, the beautifulness of mother nature and the beautifulness of electronic music or digital photos and such that are detached from the beautiful of mother nature, so the beautiful of mother nature is essential for humans, i will give you a quick example so that to notice it: I invite you to listen at the following beautiful arab song from Algeria: Ch'hal aâyit mesbar https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zS6KG2ybOB0&list=RDzS6KG2ybOB0&start_radio=1 And notice how in this beautiful arab music they are using old music instruments that give beautiful sounds and music that comes from the beautiful of mother nature or that are much nearer from the mother nature than electronic music sounds, so then i think that this arab music and song is like the beautiful of mother nature. And as i have just said that the beautiful of mother nature is essential for humans, so i think that there is a difference between my following poems of Love and mathematics, since mathematics is like far away from the beautiful of mother nature, it is like robots, but my poems of Love are like the beautiful of mother nature, here they are, read them all carefully: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/D4qlWWW-o1s And about extremist ideologies like white supremacism, i invite you to read my following thoughts about them: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ More of philosophy about Democracy and the Evolutionary Design methodology.. I will make a logical analogy between software projects and Democracy, first i will say that because of the today big complexity of software projects, so the "requirements" of those complex software projects are not clear and a lot could change in them, so this is why we are using an Evolutionary Design methodology with different tools such as Unit Testing, Test Driven Development, Design Patterns, Continuous Integration, Domain Driven Design, but we have to notice carefully that an important thing in Evolutionary Design methodology is that when those complex software projects grow, we have first to normalize there growth by ensuring that the complex software projects grow "nicely" and "balanced" by using standards, and second we have to optimize growth of the complex software projects by balancing between the criteria of the easy to change the complex software projects and the performance of the complex software projects, and third you have to maximize the growth of the complex software projects by making the most out of each optimization, and i think that by logical analogy we can notice that in Democracy we have also to normalize the growth by not allowing "extremism" or extremist ideologies that hurt Democracy, and we have also to optimize Democracy by for example well balancing between "performance" of the society and in the Democracy and the "reliability" of helping others like the weakest members of the society among the people that of course respect the laws, and so that to understand more my thoughts of my philosophy about Democracy, i invite you to read them here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vlDWhmf-MIM And about extremist ideologies like white supremacism, i invite you to read my following thoughts about them: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ More of my philosophy about entropy and about how morality is universal.. I think i am smart, and i am explaining below why morality is universal, but as you have just noticed i have just said that so that to say that morality is universal, it requires from us to know about the requirements such as why to be a global world etc., so there must be a level of consciousness, other than that i will make you feel and see much more that morality is universal since i am seeing it: So take for example the human imperfections or world imperfections, i say that it is because we have those imperfections that also we have morality, and those imperfections causes entropy(A state of disorder and disorganization), this is why we have to be more and more perfection so that to maintain order and so that to attain perfection of being much more perfect or perfect, for example humans are working in there everyday life so that to also maintain order or so that to become perfection or much more perfection, and maintaining order is also that we are perfectioning so that to not to become disorder. More of my philosophy about why morality is universal.. I think i am a smart philosopher, and i will now explain why morality is universal: So take a look at the thing that we call "time", so you can naively look at our everyday life and say that time is not relative, but you can like Einstein analyse it and prove that time is relative, and morality is the same, so when you naively look at it you will think that morality is relative, since you can notice that for example there is many countries with many laws and rules, but when you analyse it you will notice that the goal of morality that we become perfect or much more perfect pushes us forward towards more and more perfection since we have to solve our problems such as our many imperfections, it is also why morality is "progressive", so then the essence of morality become that morality is progressing towards the goal that is that we become perfect or much more perfect, so then the other details of morality are abstracted, so then those acts of humans perfectioning or perfecting towards a much more perfect world or perfect world and that are also codified as morality become that morality is universal, since also we can take this essence of morality as the most important thing. More of my philosophy about the superhuman of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche.. I think i am smart philosopher, and i will be more precise in my logical proof of why the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche believed, like the philosopher Spinoza, that morality is not universal, so notice carefully how the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche has wanted to construct a new type of man that is a superhuman in his view and this superhuman in the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a superhuman that has mastery over his emotions and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply existing, so as you are noticing that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is an inferior philosopher since he wanted to apply the morality of the strong to the morality of the weak in not wise manner, also you can notice it more by him saying the following and recognizing that there is different types of morals, and here is his saying: "It is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the slaves or the weak." That means in french: "C'est la volonté de puissance qui doit s'exprimer, non pas la morale des esclaves ou des faibles.", So the above saying of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is a proof that he recognized that there is different kinds of morals like the morals of the slaves or the weak and morals of the strong humans or the strong. Read more my following thoughts about it and about Stoicism and existentialism and about how i am explaining that the essence of morality is universal: More of my philosophy about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and more.. I have just looked at the following video about: NIETZSCHE - L'exaltation de la vie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeVVtxlg_oE I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that the philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not good, since he says that: "C'est la volonté de puissance qui doit s'exprimer, non pas la morale des esclaves ou des faibles.", that means in english: "It is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the slaves or the weak.", and he said that it needs to construct a new man that we call the superhuman, but I think that i am a philosopher that is smart and i am understanding the philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, and i think that it is an inferior philosophy, because it seeks to construct the superhumans from humans and this superhuman in the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a superhuman that has mastery over his emotions and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply existing, so as you are noticing that it is an inferior philosophy, because how can you be able to take joy in simply existing ? so as you are noticing it is illogical and it is as illogical as Stoicism(read my below thoughts about Stoicism) and i think that it is a violent philosophy as Stoicism, this is why the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsch is a failure as Stoicism, and here is what i said about Stoicism: More of my philosophy about my philosophy and about Stoicism and Existentialism.. I invite you to read this very interesting article about philosophy: Why philosophers could be the ones to transform your 2020 https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20200114-why-philosophers-could-be-the-ones-to-transform-your-2020 And notice that it says the following: "The Stoics suggest that what's most important in order to lead a good life is internal rather than external. It's about developing the right character, the right state of mind," I think i am a philosopher that is "smart", so i make you notice the logical bug in the above saying about Stoicism, and it is that developing the right character and the right state of the mind in Stoicism needs the cultural side that also comes from the external reality and hence from the "purpose" and the "meaning of life", and we can notice that Stoicism is not so smart, because how can we develop self-control and fortitude as a means of overcoming destructive emotions and such without the necessary requirements that have to give enough hope or a meaning of life that gives the necessary self-control and fortitude? so this is why i think that Stoicism as a philosophy is a failure, so what's about existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre ? Jean-Paul Sartre said that: "Existence precedes essence" or in french: "L'existence précède l'essence", and it is the central claim of existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, but i think that this claim is not so logical, since it is like a debate that asks the question of: Wich is more important, the genetical side or cultural side?, and we have to notice that the essence or nature of a human is "not" enough and it needs for example a meaning of human life and a purpose etc. so then notice that existentialism of Jean-Paul Sartre, and like in absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, says that human life is absurd, but here again my new philosophy says that human life |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment