Thursday, November 25, 2021

Digest for comp.lang.c++@googlegroups.com - 21 updates in 14 topics

Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Nov 25 02:18PM -0800

Hello,
 
 
More of my philosophy about timesharing that is a Solution to Computer Bottlenecks..
 
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I invite you to look at the following very interesting video about timesharing that is a Solution to Computer Bottlenecks:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q07PhW5sCEk
 
I think i am smart, and you have to understand one important thing
and it is: What is the difference between a software architect and
a software engineer?, i think there is an important difference and it
is also like abstracted in the following question:
 
"How it is made?"
 
So i think that software engineering works at a higher level than
a software architect, this is why you will notice that i am
quickly implementing a sophisticated stackful coroutines
Library and i am quickly implementing setjmp() and longjmp() with
x64 assembler or code machine, read my below thoughts about them, but you have to know that my sophisticated stackful coroutines Library
does a kind of timesharing as in the above video, but i think that there is two kinds of timesharing: the preemptive one, and the non-preemptive one, but the difference is that the preemptive one does interrupt with a timer the coroutines from an external scheduler in
a form of function, but notice below that i am implementing the non-preemptive timesharing in my sophisticated coroutines Library, but you have to be smart and notice that my way of doing is like the software architect way, since i am implementing it from the lowest level with x64 assembler routines that are part of the non-preemptive scheduler, but not only that, but you have also to look at how i am also implementing a
sophisticated and much more rich interface in my stackful coroutines Library, so it is like both software achitecting and software engineering, so here is all my below thoughts that shows how i am implementing it quickly, so read it carefully since you have also to know what's the problem with the stack frames when architecturing and using the setjmp() and longjmp() so that to implement coroutines:
 
More of my philosophy and precision about the link of the article and more..
 
And notice that the link below of the article that shows the problem
of implementing coroutines with just setjmp() and longjmp()
is from the last semester of the second year of the course
called "CS4411 Operating Systems" from Michigan Technological University, but i think i am smart and those courses are easy
for me, so i invite you to read about this course that requires
both the course of "CS3331 Concurrent Computing" and "CS3421 Computer Organization", and here it is:
 
http://www.csl.mtu.edu/cs4411.ck/www/Home.html
 
More of my philosophy about coroutines and about setjmp() and longjmp()..
 
I think i am smart, and i will say that with setjmp() and longjmp()
you can implement a generator or the like, but you can not implement coroutines with just setjmp() and longjmp(), and so that to understand it, i invite you to read the following article that shows how when you yield from a first function with a longjmp() to the main body of a program and when you call another functions with longjmp(), it can make the stack frames not work correctly, and when you understand it you will not use setjmp() and longjmp() alone so that to implement coroutines, so read the following article so that to understand the problem with
the stack frames, and i am understanding it easily:
 
https://www.csl.mtu.edu/cs4411.ck/www/NOTES/non-local-goto/coroutine.html
 
So this is why i have also implemented my sophisticated stackful coroutines library so that to solve this problem, and here is my sophisticated coroutines library and read about it and download it from here:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/object-oriented-stackful-coroutines-library-for-delphi-and-freepascal
 
More of my philosophy about setjmp() and longjmp() and generators and coroutines..
 
I have just quickly implemented setjmp() and longjmp() in x64 assembler,
and after that i have just implemented quickly a good example of a generator with my setjmp() and longjmp(), look at it below, and in computer science, a generator is a routine that can be used to control the iteration behaviour of a loop. All generators are also iterators. A generator is very similar to a function that returns an array, in that a generator has parameters, can be called, and generates a sequence of values. However, instead of building an array containing all the values and returning them all at once, a generator yields the values one at a time, which requires less memory and allows the caller to get started processing the first few values immediately. In short, a generator looks like a function but behaves like an iterator. So here is my implementations in freepascal and delphi and they are working perfectly:
 
Here is my first unit that implements longjmp() and setjmp() and notice
how i am saving the non-volatile registers and how i am coding it in
x64 assembler:
 
======
 
 
{ Volatile registers: The calling program assumes registers
RAX, RCX, RDX, and R8 through R11 are volatile.
The contents of registers RBX, RSI, RDI, RBP, RSP, and
R12 through R15 are considered non-volatile. Functions return
values in RAX. }
 
 
 
unit JmpLib64;
 
{$IFDEF FPC}
{$ASMMODE intel}
{$ENDIF}
interface
 
type
jmp_buf = record
RBX,
RSI,
RDI,
RSP,
RBP,
RIP,
R12,
R13,
R14,
R15: UInt64;
end;
 
{ setjmp captures the complete task state which can later be used to perform a non-local goto using longjmp. setjmp returns 0 when it is initially called, and a non-zero value when it is returning from a call to longjmp. setjmp must be called before longjmp. }
 
function setjmp(out jmpb: jmp_buf): UInt64;
 
{ longjmp restores the task state captured by setjmp (and passed in jmpb). It then returns in such a way that setjmp appears to have returned with the value retval. setjmp must be called before longjmp. }
 
procedure longjmp(const jmpb: jmp_buf; retval: UInt64);
implementation
 
function setjmp(out jmpb: jmp_buf): UInt64; assembler;{$IFDEF FPC} nostackframe; {$ENDIF}register;
asm
{ -> RCX jmpb }
{ <- RAX Result }
MOV RDX, [RSP] // Fetch return address (RIP)
// Save task state
MOV [RCX+jmp_buf.&RBX], RBX
MOV [RCX+jmp_buf.&RSI], RSI
MOV [RCX+jmp_buf.&RDI], RDI
MOV [RCX+jmp_buf.&RSP], RSP
MOV [RCX+jmp_buf.&RBP], RBP
MOV [RCX+jmp_buf.&RIP], RDX
MOV [RCX+jmp_buf.&R12], R12
MOV [RCX+jmp_buf.&R13], R13
MOV [RCX+jmp_buf.&R14], R14
MOV [RCX+jmp_buf.&R15], R15
 
 
SUB RAX, RAX
@@1:
end;
 
procedure longjmp(const jmpb: jmp_buf; retval: UInt64);assembler;{$IFDEF FPC} nostackframe; {$ENDIF}register;
asm
{ -> RCX jmpb }
{ RDX retval }
{ <- RAX Result }
XCHG RDX, RCX
MOV RAX,RCX
MOV RCX, [RDX+jmp_buf.&RIP]
// Restore task state
MOV RBX, [RDX+jmp_buf.&RBX]
MOV RSI, [RDX+jmp_buf.&RSI]
MOV RDI, [RDX+jmp_buf.&RDI]
MOV RSP, [RDX+jmp_buf.&RSP]
MOV RBP, [RDX+jmp_buf.&RBP]
MOV R12, [RDX+jmp_buf.&R12]
MOV R13, [RDX+jmp_buf.&R13]
MOV R14, [RDX+jmp_buf.&R14]
MOV R15, [RDX+jmp_buf.&R15]
MOV [RSP], RCX // Restore return address (RIP)
 
TEST RAX, RAX // Ensure retval is <> 0
JNZ @@1
MOV RAX, 1
@@1:
end;
 
end.
 
================
 
And here is my example of a generator with my longjmp() and setjmp():
 
 
{ In computer science, a generator is a routine that can be used to control the iteration behaviour of a loop. All generators are also iterators. A generator is very similar to a function that returns an array, in that a generator has parameters, can be called, and generates a sequence of values. However, instead of building an array containing all the values and returning them all at once, a generator yields the values one at a time, which requires less memory and allows the caller to get started processing the first few values immediately. In short, a generator looks like a function but behaves like an iterator. }
 
program test_generator;
 
{$APPTYPE CONSOLE}
 
uses
JmpLib64;
 
type PtrInt = ^Integer;
 
var
childtask,maintask: jmp_buf;
myarr1: array of integer;
i,a:integer;
Ptr1:PtrInt;
 
function generator(var myarr:array of integer):integer;
 
var i1:integer;
val:integer;
ptr:PtrInt;
begin
 
 
i1:=0;
 
val:= setjmp(childtask);
 
i1:=val-1;
 
if val=0 then
begin
new(ptr);
ptr^:=myarr1[i1];
longjmp(maintask,uint64(ptr));
end;
 
if val=10
then
begin
writeln('Exiting child..');
exit;
end;
 
inc(i1);
new(ptr);
ptr^:=myarr1[i1];
longjmp(maintask,uint64(ptr));
end;
 
begin
 
setlength(myarr1,10);
 
for i:=0 to 9
do myarr1[i]:=i;
 
uint64(ptr1):=setjmp(maintask);
 
if ptr1=nil then generator(myarr1);
 
a:=ptr1^;
dispose(ptr1);
 
if (a<=length(myarr1))
then
begin
if a=length(myarr1)
then longjmp(childtask,a+1)
else
begin
writeln('Value retuned by generator is: ',a);
longjmp(childtask,a+1);
end;
end;
 
setlength(myarr1,0);
 
end.
 
====
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Nov 25 12:59PM -0800

Hello,
 
 
 
More of my philosophy about the positive energy and more..
 
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I think i am smart and i will explain my way of thinking so that you understand:
 
So have you noticed that i have quickly invented many poems of Love?
so as you notice that i have quickly invented them so that to be the positive energy that is also good for productivity and quality as i am
explaining it below, and so that to be in accordance with my following proverb:

"A beautiful song of Love or a beautiful poem of Love
is like a positive spirit of positive energy that gives a soul to a body
or that gives life to the dead man."
 
So as you are noticing i am walking here with my thoughts by showing
my kind of personality, that i can for example write quickly a sophisticated philosophy and i can invent quickly interesting proverbs and i can invent quickly poems of Love..., and of course you have to know that i am a gentleman type of person, so you have to be confident in or about me, and i will invite you to listen to the following beautiful south american song by reading my below poem of Love that talks about south american city and it is also a positive energy that i am sharing with you:
 
Buena Vista Social Club - El Cuarto De Tula
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYxv6N_gUhE
 
 
---
Here is my new poem of Love:
 
I am looking at you my beautiful from the Balcony of Santiago
 
Since i am wanting to play to you my Love as a maestro
 
I am looking at you my beautiful from the Balcony of Santiago
 
As i am looking at your so beautiful hair and i am not the psycho
 
I am looking at you my beautiful from the Balcony of Santiago
 
As you are noticing that my beautiful heart doesn't contain any sorrow
 
I am looking at you my beautiful from the Balcony of Santiago
 
Since also my forever Love for you is not the gambling of the casino
 
I am looking at you my beautiful from the Balcony of Santiago
 
Since also my poem for you is like a painting of the Love of Juliet and
Romeo
 
I am looking at you my beautiful from the Balcony of Santiago
 
Since as you notice my so beautiful Love for you is not a small mosquito
 
I am looking at you my beautiful from the Balcony of Santiago
 
So as you notice i am not the white arab from Monaco but from Morocco !
 
I am looking at you my beautiful from the Balcony of Santiago
 
So as you notice my Love is not the war that needs commondos
 
Since my Love for you is beautifully flowing like the Ottawa River of
Quebec and Ontario !
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
--
 
And read my following poems of Love that i think are flexible from the start, here they are and read them carefully:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/qte9bCZiOiw
 
More philosophy about how to avoid tribalism and how to avoid extremism that hurts..
 
I think i am smart, and i will say that so that to avoid tribalism
and extremism that hurts, you have also to know how to be the "positive" energy, since the positive energy is also good for productivity and quality, since i think that white supremacists and neo-nazis are also too much "negative" energy that is not good for productivity and for quality, also they have the tendency to be dictatorship and it is not good, so read my below thoughts about the why of Democracy and about wich kind of Democracy that we have to be so that to understand, and speaking about the positive energy and its positive effect on productivity and quality, here is more logical proof of it, read the following news so that to notice it:
 
What impact is a developer's dissatisfaction likely to have on their productivity?
 
Reality, supported by scientific studies , shows that a worker is more productive when he is happy in the workplace.
 
Read more here so that to notice it:
 
https://emploi-developpez-com.translate.goog/actu/328717/Quel-impact-le-mecontentement-d-un-developpeur-est-il-susceptible-d-avoir-sur-sa-productivite-Perte-de-motivation-Manque-de-concentration-Non-respect-des-delais-Partagez-votre-experience/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=nui
 
And here is one of my proverbs about the positive energy:
 
"A beautiful song of Love or a beautiful poem of Love
is like a positive spirit of positive energy that gives a soul to a body
or that gives life to the dead man."
 
More philosophy about tribalism and about the white supremacists and neo-nazis..
 
I invite you to read the following white supremacist and neo-nazi article of national vanguard that is a white supremacist and neo-nazi website:
 
https://nationalvanguard.org/2021/11/the-myth-of-ashkenazi-jewish-and-east-asian-intellectual-supremacy/
 
I think i am smart, and i think that from the above article you
can notice the behavior of white supremacists and neo-nazis,
so they are a kind of archaic tribalism, so they are looking
at other ethnic groups like asians and jewish etc. as enemies,
and i think that it is an inferior conception and it is
an archaic tribalism that we have to transcend, and speaking
about tribalism, here is what i have just said in my philosophy
about tribalism:
 
Here is the definition of tribalism:
 
"Strong in-group loyalty"
 
Read here in the dictionary:
 
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tribalism
 
So tribalism comes with this "strong" loyality of tribalism, so i think
that this "strong" loyality can bring problems, this is why i am talking
as i am talking about it in my below thoughts by showing how to solve
the problem of tribalism:
 
More of my philosophy about how to solve the problem of tribalism and more..
 
I think we can solve the problem of tribalism by the way of knowing
how to be the right "compromise", and we can be the right compromise
by knowing how to avoid extremism that hurts, for example
i have just made a logical analogy between software projects
and Democracy and notice how i am talking about Democracy in it, here it is:
 
More of philosophy about Democracy and the Evolutionary Design methodology..
 
I will make a logical analogy between software projects and Democracy,
first i will say that because of the today big complexity of software
projects, so the "requirements" of those complex software projects are
not clear and a lot could change in them, so this is
why we are using an Evolutionary Design methodology with different tools
such as Unit Testing, Test Driven Development, Design Patterns,
Continuous Integration, Domain Driven Design, but we have to notice
carefully that an important thing in Evolutionary Design methodology is
that when those complex software projects grow, we have first to
normalize there growth by ensuring that the complex software projects
grow "nicely" and "balanced" by using standards, and second we have to
optimize growth of the complex software projects by balancing between
the criteria of the easy to change the complex software projects and the
performance of the complex software projects, and third you have to
maximize the growth of the complex software projects by making the most
out of each optimization, and i think that by logical analogy we can
notice that in Democracy we have also to normalize the growth by not
allowing "extremism" or extremist ideologies that hurt Democracy, and we
have also to optimize Democracy by for example well balancing between
"performance" of the society and in the Democracy and the "reliability"
of helping others like the weakest members of the society among the
people that of course respect the laws, and so that to understand more
my thoughts of my philosophy about Democracy, i invite you to read them
here:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vlDWhmf-MIM
 
And read my thoughts of my philosophy in the following link:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ag_ziCVV0VA
 
More of my philosophy about my new monotheistic religion and more..
 
I think i am smart, so i will ask a philosophical question of:
 
Are we truly living in a simulation ?
 
I have just thought about it more, and i think that we are
not living in a simulation, since there must be a "plan" from
this God or Gods that make us live in a simulation, and the plan
can not be that Hazardous Asteroids that killed the dinosaurs 65 million years ago have been created by a simulation, so i think
that there remain a possibility that the following of
outer body experiences is i think like a proof of the existence of
the "soul" from God and of God:
 
"A University of Southampton study has revealed that people could still
experience consciousness for up to three minutes after the heart stops
beating.
 
The study interviewed 2,060 patients from Austria, USA and the UK who
have all suffered a cardiac arrest.
 
The Express reports that 40% could recall some form of awareness after
being pronounced clinically dead.
 
One 57-year old man seemed to confirm an outer body experience by
recalling everything that was going on around him with eerie accuracy
while he was technically dead."
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/516195/university-southampton-study-science-life-death-hell-heaven
 
And read the following that also talks about study the two per cent of outer body experience that exhibited full awareness with explicit recall of "seeing" and "hearing" events – or out-of-body )
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/life-after-death-largest-ever-study-provides-evidence-that-out-of-body-and-near-death-experiences-9780195.html
 
And in my new monotheistic religion God has not created our universe
or multiverse, read about my new monotheistic religion in the following
so that to understand:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/pDWvOh4_4zI
 
 
More of my philosophy about beautiful arabic music and about arabs and more..
 
So i invite you to listen carefully to the following beautiful arabic music so that to know more about arabs:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fr3B93LVpbU
 
And read my philosophy in the following link:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ag_ziCVV0VA
 
And read my following proverbs that i think are flexible from the start and that i have just invented quickly, here they are and read them carefully:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8
 
And read my following poems of Love that i think are flexible from the start, here they are and read them carefully:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/qte9bCZiOiw
 
And read carefully about my new monotheistic religion here, since i am your new prophet from God:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/pDWvOh4_4zI
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Nov 25 12:12PM -0800

Hello,
 
 
 
More philosophy about how to avoid tribalism and how to avoid extremism that hurts..
 
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I think i am smart, and i will say that so that to avoid tribalism
and extremism that hurts, you have also to know how to be the "positive" energy, since the positive energy is also good for productivity and quality, since i think that white supremacists and neo-nazis are also too much "negative" energy that is not good for productivity and for quality, also they have the tendency to be dictatorship and it is not good, so read my below thoughts about the why of Democracy and about wich kind of Democracy that we have to be so that to understand, and speaking about the positive energy and its positive effect on productivity and quality, here is more logical proof of it, read the following news so that to notice it:
 
What impact is a developer's dissatisfaction likely to have on their productivity?
 
Reality, supported by scientific studies , shows that a worker is more productive when he is happy in the workplace.
 
Read more here so that to notice it:
 
https://emploi-developpez-com.translate.goog/actu/328717/Quel-impact-le-mecontentement-d-un-developpeur-est-il-susceptible-d-avoir-sur-sa-productivite-Perte-de-motivation-Manque-de-concentration-Non-respect-des-delais-Partagez-votre-experience/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=nui
 
And here is one of my proverbs about the positive energy:
 
"A beautiful song of Love or a beautiful poem of Love
is like a positive spirit of positive energy that gives a soul to a body
or that gives life to the dead man."
 
More philosophy about tribalism and about the white supremacists and neo-nazis..
 
I invite you to read the following white supremacist and neo-nazi article of national vanguard that is a white supremacist and neo-nazi website:
 
https://nationalvanguard.org/2021/11/the-myth-of-ashkenazi-jewish-and-east-asian-intellectual-supremacy/
 
I think i am smart, and i think that from the above article you
can notice the behavior of white supremacists and neo-nazis,
so they are a kind of archaic tribalism, so they are looking
at other ethnic groups like asians and jewish etc. as enemies,
and i think that it is an inferior conception and it is
an archaic tribalism that we have to transcend, and speaking
about tribalism, here is what i have just said in my philosophy
about tribalism:
 
Here is the definition of tribalism:
 
"Strong in-group loyalty"
 
Read here in the dictionary:
 
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tribalism
 
So tribalism comes with this "strong" loyality of tribalism, so i think
that this "strong" loyality can bring problems, this is why i am talking
as i am talking about it in my below thoughts by showing how to solve
the problem of tribalism:
 
More of my philosophy about how to solve the problem of tribalism and more..
 
I think we can solve the problem of tribalism by the way of knowing
how to be the right "compromise", and we can be the right compromise
by knowing how to avoid extremism that hurts, for example
i have just made a logical analogy between software projects
and Democracy and notice how i am talking about Democracy in it, here it is:
 
More of philosophy about Democracy and the Evolutionary Design methodology..
 
I will make a logical analogy between software projects and Democracy,
first i will say that because of the today big complexity of software
projects, so the "requirements" of those complex software projects are
not clear and a lot could change in them, so this is
why we are using an Evolutionary Design methodology with different tools
such as Unit Testing, Test Driven Development, Design Patterns,
Continuous Integration, Domain Driven Design, but we have to notice
carefully that an important thing in Evolutionary Design methodology is
that when those complex software projects grow, we have first to
normalize there growth by ensuring that the complex software projects
grow "nicely" and "balanced" by using standards, and second we have to
optimize growth of the complex software projects by balancing between
the criteria of the easy to change the complex software projects and the
performance of the complex software projects, and third you have to
maximize the growth of the complex software projects by making the most
out of each optimization, and i think that by logical analogy we can
notice that in Democracy we have also to normalize the growth by not
allowing "extremism" or extremist ideologies that hurt Democracy, and we
have also to optimize Democracy by for example well balancing between
"performance" of the society and in the Democracy and the "reliability"
of helping others like the weakest members of the society among the
people that of course respect the laws, and so that to understand more
my thoughts of my philosophy about Democracy, i invite you to read them
here:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vlDWhmf-MIM
 
And read my thoughts of my philosophy in the following link:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ag_ziCVV0VA
 
More of my philosophy about my new monotheistic religion and more..
 
I think i am smart, so i will ask a philosophical question of:
 
Are we truly living in a simulation ?
 
I have just thought about it more, and i think that we are
not living in a simulation, since there must be a "plan" from
this God or Gods that make us live in a simulation, and the plan
can not be that Hazardous Asteroids that killed the dinosaurs 65 million years ago have been created by a simulation, so i think
that there remain a possibility that the following of
outer body experiences is i think like a proof of the existence of
the "soul" from God and of God:
 
"A University of Southampton study has revealed that people could still
experience consciousness for up to three minutes after the heart stops
beating.
 
The study interviewed 2,060 patients from Austria, USA and the UK who
have all suffered a cardiac arrest.
 
The Express reports that 40% could recall some form of awareness after
being pronounced clinically dead.
 
One 57-year old man seemed to confirm an outer body experience by
recalling everything that was going on around him with eerie accuracy
while he was technically dead."
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/516195/university-southampton-study-science-life-death-hell-heaven
 
And read the following that also talks about study the two per cent of outer body experience that exhibited full awareness with explicit recall of "seeing" and "hearing" events – or out-of-body )
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/life-after-death-largest-ever-study-provides-evidence-that-out-of-body-and-near-death-experiences-9780195.html
 
And in my new monotheistic religion God has not created our universe
or multiverse, read about my new monotheistic religion in the following
so that to understand:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/pDWvOh4_4zI
 
 
More of my philosophy about beautiful arabic music and about arabs and more..
 
So i invite you to listen carefully to the following beautiful arabic music so that to know more about arabs:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fr3B93LVpbU
 
And read my philosophy in the following link:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ag_ziCVV0VA
 
And read my following proverbs that i think are flexible from the start and that i have just invented quickly, here they are and read them carefully:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8
 
And read my following poems of Love that i think are flexible from the start, here they are and read them carefully:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/qte9bCZiOiw
 
And read carefully about my new monotheistic religion here, since i am your new prophet from God:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/pDWvOh4_4zI
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Nov 25 11:00AM -0800

Hello,
 
 
More philosophy about tribalism and about the white supremacists and neo-nazis..
 
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I invite you to read the following white supremacist and neo-nazi new article of national vanguard that is a white supremacist and neo-nazi website:
 
https://nationalvanguard.org/2021/11/the-myth-of-ashkenazi-jewish-and-east-asian-intellectual-supremacy/
 
I think i am smart, and i think that from the above article you
can notice the behavior of white supremcists and neo-nazis,
so they are a kind of archaic tribalism, so they are looking
at other ethnic groups like asians and jewish etc. as enemies,
and i think that it is an inferior conception and it is
an archaic tribalism that we have to trannscend, and speaking
about tribalism here is what i have just said in my philosophy
about tribalism:
 
Here is the definition of tribalism:
 
"Strong in-group loyalty"
 
Read here in the dictionary:
 
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tribalism
 
So tribalism comes with this "strong" loyality of tribalism, so i think
that this "strong" loyality can bring problems, this is why i am talking
as i am talking about it in my below thoughts by showing how to solve
the problem of tribalism:
 
More of my philosophy about how to solve the problem of tribalism and more..
 
I think we can solve the problem of tribalism by the way of knowing
how to be the right "compromise", and we can be the right compromise
by knowing how to avoid extremism that hurts, for example
i have just made a logical analogy between software projects
and Democracy and notice how i am talking about Democracy in it, here it is:
 
More of philosophy about Democracy and the Evolutionary Design methodology..
 
I will make a logical analogy between software projects and Democracy,
first i will say that because of the today big complexity of software
projects, so the "requirements" of those complex software projects are
not clear and a lot could change in them, so this is
why we are using an Evolutionary Design methodology with different tools
such as Unit Testing, Test Driven Development, Design Patterns,
Continuous Integration, Domain Driven Design, but we have to notice
carefully that an important thing in Evolutionary Design methodology is
that when those complex software projects grow, we have first to
normalize there growth by ensuring that the complex software projects
grow "nicely" and "balanced" by using standards, and second we have to
optimize growth of the complex software projects by balancing between
the criteria of the easy to change the complex software projects and the
performance of the complex software projects, and third you have to
maximize the growth of the complex software projects by making the most
out of each optimization, and i think that by logical analogy we can
notice that in Democracy we have also to normalize the growth by not
allowing "extremism" or extremist ideologies that hurt Democracy, and we
have also to optimize Democracy by for example well balancing between
"performance" of the society and in the Democracy and the "reliability"
of helping others like the weakest members of the society among the
people that of course respect the laws, and so that to understand more
my thoughts of my philosophy about Democracy, i invite you to read them
here:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vlDWhmf-MIM
 
And read my thoughts of my philosophy in the following link:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ag_ziCVV0VA
 
More of my philosophy about my new monotheistic religion and more..
 
I think i am smart, so i will ask a philosophical question of:
 
Are we truly living in a simulation ?
 
I have just thought about it more, and i think that we are
not living in a simulation, since there must be a "plan" from
this God or Gods that make us live in a simulation, and the plan
can not be that Hazardous Asteroids that killed the dinosaurs 65 million years ago have been created by a simulation, so i think
that there remain a possibility that the following of
outer body experiences is i think like a proof of the existence of
the "soul" from God and of God:
 
"A University of Southampton study has revealed that people could still
experience consciousness for up to three minutes after the heart stops
beating.
 
The study interviewed 2,060 patients from Austria, USA and the UK who
have all suffered a cardiac arrest.
 
The Express reports that 40% could recall some form of awareness after
being pronounced clinically dead.
 
One 57-year old man seemed to confirm an outer body experience by
recalling everything that was going on around him with eerie accuracy
while he was technically dead."
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/516195/university-southampton-study-science-life-death-hell-heaven
 
And read the following that also talks about study the two per cent of outer body experience that exhibited full awareness with explicit recall of "seeing" and "hearing" events – or out-of-body )
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/life-after-death-largest-ever-study-provides-evidence-that-out-of-body-and-near-death-experiences-9780195.html
 
And in my new monotheistic religion God has not created our universe
or multiverse, read about my new monotheistic religion in the following
so that to understand:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/pDWvOh4_4zI
 
 
More of my philosophy about beautiful arabic music and about arabs and more..
 
So i invite you to listen carefully to the following beautiful arabic music so that to know more about arabs:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fr3B93LVpbU
 
And read my philosophy in the following link:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ag_ziCVV0VA
 
And read my following proverbs that i think are flexible from the start and that i have just invented quickly, here they are and read them carefully:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8
 
And read my following poems of Love that i think are flexible from the start, here they are and read them carefully:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/qte9bCZiOiw
 
And read carefully about my new monotheistic religion here, since i am your new prophet from God:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/pDWvOh4_4zI
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Manfred <noname@add.invalid>: Nov 25 12:00PM +0100

On 11/24/2021 11:12 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
 
> Humm... Perhaps, a main question can be, is there such a thing as a
> "green" programmer? One can write crappy and bloated code in C, that
> goes much slower than, say Python.
 
Everything is possible, but achieving that requires some specialized
skillset(!)
 
However, one can write really
> language... Yes!
 
> Can things be greener with a crappy programmer and a low-level
> language... Humm, No? By chance? Unknown...?
 
The issue is about idiomatic constructs, i.e. the mass of code running
out there. I think that special circumstances and perverse cases do not
really matter.
Even more considering that C code that is so bad as to manage to perform
worse than some interpreted language is most likely pretty much
unmaintainable too, so doomed to fast extinction in the digital ecosystem.
Manfred <noname@add.invalid>: Nov 25 12:12PM +0100

On 11/23/2021 9:50 PM, Bart wrote:
>> "modern" OS's that eat Tflops just to perform even the simplest of
>> tasks, and there goes all of that efficiency.
 
> This is why talk of the greenest language is nonsense.
 
Not really, this study does show a significant difference between
language choices for the same task.
 
 
> How about writing efficient applications?
Yes, and that includes choosing the right language.
 
And efficient OSes (there
> might be 1000 processes on my PC right now).
That's a different matter than applications. It still affects overall
energy consumption of course. The choice of the language still matters
for OS processes, but general OS design has a major impact as well.
My critics is addressed to components that are shipped with many OS's,
yet are not technically part of the core OS infrastructure. Think e.g.
the Windows Update infrastructure - it's probably one of the most
bloated features I've ever seen.
 
> dismisses mine even though they are fast, yet they show that the basic
> job of source->binary translation can be done 1-2 magnitutes faster than
> the heavy-duty compilers he favours.
 
As others have pointed out, this does not matter, since compilers are
not part of a typical runtime environment.
 
DozingDog@thekennel.co: Nov 25 11:19AM

On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 11:54:50 -0500
>> in the C++ STL. It has 30 years of refining behind it.
 
>So you can directly implement that algorithm in C. yes, it gets messier,
>but you CAN do it.
 
But there's no guarantee that it would be any faster.
 
>code by them using the library. A custom coded C version can do just as
>well, because you can express the same instruction sequences in C as
>were generated in C++, you just need to be or explicit about it.
 
Not always. eg:
 
#include <iostream>
 
constexpr int func(int cnt)
{
int val = 1;
while(--cnt) val *= 2;
return val;
}
 
 
int main()
{
constexpr int val = func(10);
std::cout << val << std::endl;
return 0;
}
 
 
In C++14 and onwards func() will literally be run by the compiler at compile
time and the result hard coded into the binary. No C compiler can do that not
because the language couldn't do it in theory, but because its never been
specified in the standard.
Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid>: Nov 25 11:46AM

> time and the result hard coded into the binary. No C compiler can do that not
> because the language couldn't do it in theory, but because its never been
> specified in the standard.
 
Actually gcc (and probably clang) will inline that function and calculate it
at compile time in C. You'll need a much more complicated constexpr function
for it to not be calculated at compile time by the compiler in C.
Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org>: Nov 25 07:04AM -0500

> time and the result hard coded into the binary. No C compiler can do that not
> because the language couldn't do it in theory, but because its never been
> specified in the standard.
 
But you as the C programmer can do that too.
 
Rather than write the expression func(10), since for this to work in
C++, that 10 MUST be a known constant, I can manually compute the value.
 
Again, the claim is that you can write the optimal code in C, but it may
be a lot of work. It can be optimal for the use of CPU, but may well not
be optimal for the use of Programmer.
DozingDog@thekennel.co: Nov 25 03:57PM

On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 11:46:56 -0000 (UTC)
 
>Actually gcc (and probably clang) will inline that function and calculate it
>at compile time in C. You'll need a much more complicated constexpr function
>for it to not be calculated at compile time by the compiler in C.
 
Possibly if you set optimisation quite high (and remove the constexpr keyword),
but you can't rely on it, whereas you can in C++ because its in the standard.
DozingDog@thekennel.co: Nov 25 03:59PM

On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 07:04:54 -0500
 
>But you as the C programmer can do that too.
 
>Rather than write the expression func(10), since for this to work in
>C++, that 10 MUST be a known constant, I can manually compute the value.
 
You could manually compute logarithm and trig tables but I imagine you'd
prefer to use log() and sin() instead.
 
>Again, the claim is that you can write the optimal code in C, but it may
>be a lot of work. It can be optimal for the use of CPU, but may well not
>be optimal for the use of Programmer.
 
Well quite.
Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>: Nov 25 07:13PM +0100

> none of the stuff I wanted, and saved a LOT of memory as the standard
> string class include a LOT of virtual functions to do things I don't
> need, ...
 
basic_string<> doesn't include virtual functions and if basic_string<>
would use virtual functions, they would take only one VMT-pointer per
object.
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Nov 25 09:46AM -0800

Hello,
 
 
More of my philosophy about my new monotheistic religion and more..
 
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
 
I think i am smart, so i will ask a philosophical question of:
 
Are we truly living in a simulation ?
 
I have just thought about it more, and i think that we are
not living in a simulation, since there must be a "plan" from
this God or Gods that make us live in a simulation, and the plan
can not be that Hazardous Asteroids that killed the dinosaurs 65 million years ago have been created by a simulation, so i think
that there remain a possibility that the following of
outer body experiences is i think like a proof of the existence of
the "soul" from God and of God:
 
"A University of Southampton study has revealed that people could still
experience consciousness for up to three minutes after the heart stops
beating.
 
The study interviewed 2,060 patients from Austria, USA and the UK who
have all suffered a cardiac arrest.
 
The Express reports that 40% could recall some form of awareness after
being pronounced clinically dead.
 
One 57-year old man seemed to confirm an outer body experience by
recalling everything that was going on around him with eerie accuracy
while he was technically dead."
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/516195/university-southampton-study-science-life-death-hell-heaven
 
And read the following that also talks about study the two per cent of outer body experience that exhibited full awareness with explicit recall of "seeing" and "hearing" events – or out-of-body )
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/life-after-death-largest-ever-study-provides-evidence-that-out-of-body-and-near-death-experiences-9780195.html
 
And in my new monotheistic religion God has not created our universe
or multiverse, read about my new monotheistic religion in the following
so that to understand:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/pDWvOh4_4zI
 
 
More of my philosophy about beautiful arabic music and about arabs and more..
 
So i invite you to listen carefully to the following beautiful arabic music so that to know more about arabs:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fr3B93LVpbU
 
And read my philosophy in the following link:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ag_ziCVV0VA
 
And read my following proverbs that i think are flexible from the start and that i have just invented quickly, here they are and read them carefully:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8
 
And read my following poems of Love that i think are flexible from the start, here they are and read them carefully:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/qte9bCZiOiw
 
And read carefully about my new monotheistic religion here, since i am your new prophet from God:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/pDWvOh4_4zI
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Nov 25 07:39AM -0800

Hello,
 
 
More of my philosophy about beautiful arabic music and about arabs and more..
 
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
 
So i invite you to listen carefully to the following beautiful arabic music so that to know more about arabs:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fr3B93LVpbU
 
And read my philosophy in the following link:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ag_ziCVV0VA
 
And read my following proverbs that i think are flexible from the start and that i have just invented quickly, here they are and read them carefully:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8
 
And read my following poems of Love that i think are flexible from the start, here they are and read them carefully:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/qte9bCZiOiw
 
And read carefully about my new monotheistic religion here, since i am your new prophet from God:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/pDWvOh4_4zI
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>: Nov 25 03:02PM +0100

This is easier:
 
#pragma once
#include <iterator>
#include <concepts>
#include <compare>
#include <cassert>
#include <algorithm>
 
template<typename RandomIt, typename T, typename Pred>
std::pair<RandomIt, RandomIt> xequal_range( RandomIt begin, RandomIt
end, T const &key, Pred pred )
requires std::random_access_iterator<RandomIt>
&&
requires( Pred pred, typename
std::iterator_traits<RandomIt>::value_type &elem, T const &key )
{
{ pred( elem, key ) } -> std::convertible_to<std::strong_ordering>;
}
{
using namespace std;
size_t lower, upper, mid, hit;
strong_ordering so;
for( lower = 0, upper = end - begin, hit = -1; lower < upper; )
{
mid = (lower + upper) / 2;
so = pred( begin[mid], key );
if( so >= 0 )
{
if( so == 0 )
hit = mid;
upper = mid;
}
else
lower = mid + 1;
}
if( hit == -1 )
return pair<RandomIt, RandomIt>( end, end );
begin += hit;
lower = 0;
upper = end - begin;
do
{
mid = (lower + upper) / 2;
so = pred( begin[mid], key );
if( so > 0 )
upper = mid;
else
// so == 0
lower = mid + 1;
} while( lower != upper );
end = begin + lower;
return pair<RandomIt, RandomIt>( begin, end );
}
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Nov 24 07:44PM -0800

Hello,
 
 
More of my philosophy about God and the simulation..
 
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I think i am smart, and when i just said that God is making us live in a simulation, i also mean that he has given us free will in this sort
of his simulation, and then does a monkey exist? so i think that the simulation is from God and it is so sophisticated that it has created the monkey in this simulation from God.
 
More of my philosophy about monotheistic religions and about the simulation..
 
I think i am smart, and i know more about the game of the one that
have made us live in a simulation, i think what is missing in this
game of simulation is the "plan", but i think that we have to be smart
and i think that the plan is that the one that is making us live in
a simulation is the one that we call God, and to know more about his plan you can read carefully about my new monotheistic religion here, since i am your new prophet from God:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/pDWvOh4_4zI
 
Read my previous thoughts:
 
More of my philosophy about humanity and about the simulation..
 
I think i am smart, and is there any free will since i think we are living in a simulation, so it is an interesting philosophical question,
and here is my answer:
 
So i think that the one or the ones that are making humans etc. live in a simulation are like "Gods", so i think that this level of perfection of them can look to us like we are being free will, so i think that we
have to be smart and continu to live in a simulation and know how to manage efficiently.
 
More of my philosophy about consciousness and about humans..
 
I think i am smart, and i am noticing something really important,
it is that how our universe or multiverse have been created or existed from nothing?, i think that there is something very important that is happening, since i think this created or existing from nothing is also the sign that we are living in a "simulation", and i think that i am able to detect the game of the one or ones that is or are making us live in a simulation, you can even notice it more clearly by reading the following that talks about the outer body experiences and it is also the signs that we are living in a simulation:
 
"A University of Southampton study has revealed that people could still
experience consciousness for up to three minutes after the heart stops
beating.
 
The study interviewed 2,060 patients from Austria, USA and the UK who
have all suffered a cardiac arrest.
 
The Express reports that 40% could recall some form of awareness after
being pronounced clinically dead.
 
One 57-year old man seemed to confirm an outer body experience by
recalling everything that was going on around him with eerie accuracy
while he was technically dead."
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/516195/university-southampton-study-science-life-death-hell-heaven
 
And read the following that also talks about study the two per cent of outer body experience that exhibited full awareness with explicit recall of "seeing" and "hearing" events – or out-of-body )
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/life-after-death-largest-ever-study-provides-evidence-that-out-of-body-and-near-death-experiences-9780195.html
 
So i think that even the monotheistic religions are the result of
that we are living in a simulation.
 
And read the following scientist that says also that we are living in
a simulation:
 
Michio Kaku - Is the Universe A Digital Simulation
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eb7uZXZHVk8
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Nov 24 07:15PM -0800

Hello,
 
 
 
More of my philosophy about monotheistic religions and about the simulation..
 
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I think i am smart, and i know more about the game of the one that
have made us live in a simulation, i think what is missing in this
game of simulation is the "plan", but i think that we have to be smart
and i think that the plan is that the one that is making us live in
a simulation is the one that we call God, and to know more about his plan you can read carefully about my new monotheistic religion here, since i am your new prophet from God:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/pDWvOh4_4zI
 
Read my previous thoughts:
 
More of my philosophy about humanity and about the simulation..
 
I think i am smart, and is there any free will since i think we are living in a simulation, so it is an interesting philosophical question,
and here is my answer:
 
So i think that the one or the ones that are making humans etc. live in a simulation are like "Gods", so i think that this level of perfection of them can look to us like we are being free will, so i think that we
have to be smart and continu to live in a simulation and know how to manage efficiently.
 
More of my philosophy about consciousness and about humans..
 
I think i am smart, and i am noticing something really important,
it is that how our universe or multiverse have been created or existed from nothing?, i think that there is something very important that is happening, since i think this created or existing from nothing is also the sign that we are living in a "simulation", and i think that i am able to detect the game of the one or ones that is or are making us live in a simulation, you can even notice it more clearly by reading the following that talks about the outer body experiences and it is also the signs that we are living in a simulation:
 
"A University of Southampton study has revealed that people could still
experience consciousness for up to three minutes after the heart stops
beating.
 
The study interviewed 2,060 patients from Austria, USA and the UK who
have all suffered a cardiac arrest.
 
The Express reports that 40% could recall some form of awareness after
being pronounced clinically dead.
 
One 57-year old man seemed to confirm an outer body experience by
recalling everything that was going on around him with eerie accuracy
while he was technically dead."
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/516195/university-southampton-study-science-life-death-hell-heaven
 
And read the following that also talks about study the two per cent of outer body experience that exhibited full awareness with explicit recall of "seeing" and "hearing" events – or out-of-body )
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/life-after-death-largest-ever-study-provides-evidence-that-out-of-body-and-near-death-experiences-9780195.html
 
So i think that even the monotheistic religions are the result of
that we are living in a simulation.
 
And read the following scientist that says also that we are living in
a simulation:
 
Michio Kaku - Is the Universe A Digital Simulation
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eb7uZXZHVk8
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Nov 24 06:33PM -0800

Hello,
 
 
More of my philosophy about humanity and about the simulation..
 
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I think i am smart, and is there any free will since i think we are living in a simulation, so it is an interesting philosophical question,
and here is my answer:
 
So i think that the one or the ones that are making humans etc. live in a simulation are like "Gods", so i think that this level of perfection of them can look to us like we are being free will, so i think that we
have to be smart and continu to live in a simulation and know how to manage efficiently.
 
More of my philosophy about consciousness and about humans..
 
I think i am smart, and i am noticing something really important,
it is that how our universe or multiverse have been created or existed from nothing?, i think that there is something very important that is happening, since i think this created or existing from nothing is also the sign that we are living in a "simulation", and i think that i am able to detect the game of the one or ones that is or are making us live in a simulation, you can even notice it more clearly by reading the following that talks about the outer body experiences and it is also the signs that we are living in a simulation:
 
"A University of Southampton study has revealed that people could still
experience consciousness for up to three minutes after the heart stops
beating.
 
The study interviewed 2,060 patients from Austria, USA and the UK who
have all suffered a cardiac arrest.
 
The Express reports that 40% could recall some form of awareness after
being pronounced clinically dead.
 
One 57-year old man seemed to confirm an outer body experience by
recalling everything that was going on around him with eerie accuracy
while he was technically dead."
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/516195/university-southampton-study-science-life-death-hell-heaven
 
And read the following that also talks about study the two per cent of outer body experience that exhibited full awareness with explicit recall of "seeing" and "hearing" events – or out-of-body )
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/life-after-death-largest-ever-study-provides-evidence-that-out-of-body-and-near-death-experiences-9780195.html
 
So i think that even the monotheistic religions are the result of
that we are living in a simulation.
 
And read the following scientist that says also that we are living in
a simulation:
 
Michio Kaku - Is the Universe A Digital Simulation
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eb7uZXZHVk8
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Nov 24 05:57PM -0800

Hello,
 
 
More of my philosophy about consciousness and about humans..
 
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I think i am smart, and i am noticing something really important,
it is that how our universe has been created from nothing?,
i think that there is something very important that is happening, since i think this created or existing from nothing is also the sign that we are living in a "simulation", and i think that i am able to detect the game of the one that is making us live in a simulation, you can even notice it more clearly by reading the following that talks about the outer body experiences and it is also the signs that we are living in a
simulation:

"A University of Southampton study has revealed that people could still
experience consciousness for up to three minutes after the heart stops
beating.
 
The study interviewed 2,060 patients from Austria, USA and the UK who
have all suffered a cardiac arrest.
 
The Express reports that 40% could recall some form of awareness after
being pronounced clinically dead.
 
One 57-year old man seemed to confirm an outer body experience by
recalling everything that was going on around him with eerie accuracy
while he was technically dead."
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/516195/university-southampton-study-science-life-death-hell-heaven
 
And read the following that also talks about study the two per cent of outer body experience that exhibited full awareness with explicit recall of "seeing" and "hearing" events – or out-of-body )
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/life-after-death-largest-ever-study-provides-evidence-that-out-of-body-and-near-death-experiences-9780195.html
 
So i think that even the monotheistic religions are the result of
that we are living in a simulation.
 
And read the following scientist that says also that we are living in
a simulation:
 
Michio Kaku - Is the Universe A Digital Simulation
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eb7uZXZHVk8
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Nov 24 03:57PM -0800

Hello,
 
 
 
More of my philosophy about the space and time and is it a graph or network..
 
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I think i am smart and i will invite you to read the following
from a jewish scientist called Stephen Wolfram:
 
What Is Spacetime, Really?
 
https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2015/12/what-is-spacetime-really/
 
 
So notice that in his model he is saying that space is a network or a graph from where we can construct the rest of the universe, but
you have to notice that there is still a problem and it is the following in arabic and english:
 
"Hal min la' wujud ya'tina' al wujud" , and its translation in english is: "Can from the nonexistent or the not existent comes the existent ?"
 
So as you are noticing that Stephen Wolfram above is saying
that this network or graph that we call space of our universe or multiverses has always existed,and this doesn't logically contradict my saying that there is some things such as the wide space of the universe or multiverses or such a thing as God that can not be explained with the law of causation , since they have "always" existed.
 
More of my philosophy about the problem of time and space..
 
I think i am smart and i will explain more clearly so that you understand, so i invite you to read the following article
so that to understand the problem:
 
https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/12/07/65014/how-does-time-dilation-affect-aging-during-high-speed-space-travel/
 
 
So notice how it is saying the following:
 
"Time dilation goes back to Einstein's theory of special relativity, which teaches us that motion through space actually creates alterations in the flow of time. The faster you move through the three dimensions that define physical space, the more slowly you're moving through the fourth dimension, time––at least relative to another object. Time is measured differently for the twin who moved through space and the twin who stayed on Earth. The clock in motion will tick more slowly than the clocks we're watching on Earth."
 
 
So i think that it is not saying it correctly, since when you say:
 
"The clock in motion will tick more slowly than the clocks we're watching on Earth."
 
It is the problem since the theory must be logical in practice,
so we are not knowing how to explain it practically, so i think i will
explain it more:
 
I think that time has a characteristics that you can not understand easily practically and logically, since i can give you an example so that you understand:
 
So i think that there is something really important to notice,
since i think that for example the wide "space" of our universe or the
multiverse has always existed, so we can then say that there is no cause
that has created the wide "space" of our universe or multiverse, so then
we can then say that we can not give a meaning by the law of causation
in such case, since the law of "causation" doesn't apply to some things
such as the wide space of the universe, so then we can logically infer
that there is some things such as God or the wide space of the universe
that have no cause that has created them, so then we can logically infer
that we humans have the tendency to think things by using the law of
causation, but i think it is a big logical mistake, because there is
things such as the wide space of the universe that have no cause, so
time has the same problem i think, since you have the tendency to
want to explain time with the law of causation, but i think it is
a mistake.
 
Read my previous thoughts:
 
More of my philosophy about the multiple worlds and multiple universes and about time..
 
I think i am smart and i have just read the following article and i invite you to read it here:
 
What Is Time?
 
https://www.sciencealert.com/time
 
 
And notice that the article says the following about time:
 
--
"Two people moving at the same velocity will each agree their measures of distance and time match. As one person changes speed, however, they will see the other's measure of time and distance change, even as their own stays the same.
 
Without any reason to prioritize one perspective of time over another, this means time isn't a constant universal unit at all. It is a relative measurement that varies as objects move faster or slower, or as they're subjected to more or less gravity.
 
Gravity curves space and time: The stronger the gravity, the more it curves space-time, and the more time slows down."
--
 
So i think that what i am saying below about time is greatly probable,
since i think that there remains one important thing that i will say and it is that from my below thoughts of my philosophy about time, we can
say that there is like multiple worlds or universes that emerge when
Gravity curves space and time or the moving faster makes time becomes relative, so i think it is related to the subatomic layer, since when
Gravity curves space and time or the moving faster makes time relative, it is the subatomic layer that is changed and it composes again another
new world or universe that emerges that makes the time relative, and it is like the emergence of intelligence of an Ant colony, so read my previous thoughts so that to understand:
 
More of my philosophy about disorder and about God and more..
 
I think i am smart, and when you are naive you will quickly say that
God can not come from "disorder" like from where has come our universe,
but i will say that disorder is not a sufficient condition to make
God not exist, since in arabic we can say: "Hal min la' wujud ya'tina'
al wujud" , and its translation in english is: "Can from the nonexistent or the not existent comes the existent ?", so as you are noticing that we can for example say that the many other universes than our universe have always existed, and this can make us say that something other than those universes can have always existed, like the one that we call God.
 
More of my philosophy about the nature of our universe and the other universes..
 
I think i am smart, and i think that the nature of our universe is
that the lowest layer of the subatomic is also made of a kind of
"diversification", like in an Ant colony, and i think that this diversification comes from a kind of disorder from evolutive composition from the other universes that are disorder, but i think that there is a special thing to notice that for example the individual subatomic of time seems like made of disorder, but the composition of all the subatomic layer gives an emergence of order or intelligence like the time that we know it with its characteristic of being relative.
 
More of my philosophy about the distributed intelligence and more..
 
I think i am smart, so i think the intelligence of an Ant colony emerges from a "distributed" intelligence, so an individual Ant can be specialized like in our kind of civilization, but even if an Ant is specialized and he can be viewed as much less capable of constructing the intelligence of an Ant colony, the distributed intelligence of the Ant colony can make emerge the intelligence of an Ant colony, so i think that time is the same, the individual subatomic of time can be like more specialized, but all the subatomic layer can give emergence to time as we know it and to relativity of time.
 
More of my philosophy about what is time as we know it..
 
I think i am smart, and i think you know me much more now, and now
i will explain my point of view of what is time as we know it:
 
I think time that is relative as has said it Albert Einstein is an "emergence", so it is like an Ant colony, so if you look at an individual Ant in its colony you will like say that he is like disorder that will not be able to construct what constructs an Ant colony, so then the Ant colony is an "emergence" of intelligence, it is like the stomach of a human that is also an emergence of a kind of intelligence that knows how to process food, so i think time that is relative as has said it Einstein is also an "emergence", but when you look at time individually from the subatomic point of view you will like say that it is a disorder that can not construct the time that we know it, and it is by logical analogy like the example of the individual Ant above, but i think that the all subatomic layer has made "emerge" time as we know it, and it is like the emergence of intelligence of an Ant colony.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Nov 24 03:24PM -0800

Hello,
 
 
More of my philosophy about the problem of time and space..
 
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I think i am smart and i will explain more clearly so that you understand, so i invite you to read the following article
so that to understand the problem:
 
https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/12/07/65014/how-does-time-dilation-affect-aging-during-high-speed-space-travel/
 
 
So notice how it is saying the following:
 
"Time dilation goes back to Einstein's theory of special relativity, which teaches us that motion through space actually creates alterations in the flow of time. The faster you move through the three dimensions that define physical space, the more slowly you're moving through the fourth dimension, time––at least relative to another object. Time is measured differently for the twin who moved through space and the twin who stayed on Earth. The clock in motion will tick more slowly than the clocks we're watching on Earth."
 
 
So i think that it is not saying it correctly, since when you say:

"The clock in motion will tick more slowly than the clocks we're watching on Earth."
 
It is the problem since the theory must be logical in practice,
so we are not knowing how to explain it practically, so i think i will
explain it more:
 
I think that time has a characteristics that you can not understand easily practically and logically, since i can give you an example so that you understand:
 
So i think that there is something really important to notice,
since i think that for example the wide "space" of our universe or the
multiverse has always existed, so we can then say that there is no cause
that has created the wide "space" of our universe or multiverse, so then
we can then say that we can not give a meaning by the law of causation
in such case, since the law of "causation" doesn't apply to some things
such as the wide space of the universe, so then we can logically infer
that there is some things such as God or the wide space of the universe
that have no cause that has created them, so then we can logically infer
that we humans have the tendency to think things by using the law of
causation, but i think it is a big logical mistake, because there is
things such as the wide space of the universe that have no cause, so
time has the same problem i think, since you have the tendency to
want to explain time with the law of causation, but i think it is
a mistake.
 
Read my previous thoughts:
 
More of my philosophy about the multiple worlds and multiple universes and about time..
 
I think i am smart and i have just read the following article and i invite you to read it here:
 
What Is Time?
 
https://www.sciencealert.com/time
 
 
And notice that the article says the following about time:
 
--
"Two people moving at the same velocity will each agree their measures of distance and time match. As one person changes speed, however, they will see the other's measure of time and distance change, even as their own stays the same.
 
Without any reason to prioritize one perspective of time over another, this means time isn't a constant universal unit at all. It is a relative measurement that varies as objects move faster or slower, or as they're subjected to more or less gravity.
 
Gravity curves space and time: The stronger the gravity, the more it curves space-time, and the more time slows down."
--
 
So i think that what i am saying below about time is greatly probable,
since i think that there remains one important thing that i will say and it is that from my below thoughts of my philosophy about time, we can
say that there is like multiple worlds or universes that emerge when
Gravity curves space and time or the moving faster makes time becomes relative, so i think it is related to the subatomic layer, since when
Gravity curves space and time or the moving faster makes time relative, it is the subatomic layer that is changed and it composes again another
new world or universe that emerges that makes the time relative, and it is like the emergence of intelligence of an Ant colony, so read my previous thoughts so that to understand:
 
More of my philosophy about disorder and about God and more..
 
I think i am smart, and when you are naive you will quickly say that
God can not come from "disorder" like from where has come our universe,
but i will say that disorder is not a sufficient condition to make
God not exist, since in arabic we can say: "Hal min la' wujud ya'tina'
al wujud" , and its translation in english is: "Can from the not existent comes the existent ?", so as you are noticing that we can
for example say that the many other universes than our universe have always existed, and this can make us say that something other than those universes can have always existed, like the one that we call God.
 
More of my philosophy about the nature of our universe and the other universes..
 
I think i am smart, and i think that the nature of our universe is
that the lowest layer of the subatomic is also made of a kind of
"diversification", like in an Ant colony, and i think that this diversification comes from a kind of disorder from evolutive composition from the other universes that are disorder, but i think that there is a special thing to notice that for example the individual subatomic of time seems like made of disorder, but the composition of all the subatomic layer gives an emergence of order or intelligence like the time that we know it with its characteristic of being relative.
 
More of my philosophy about the distributed intelligence and more..
 
I think i am smart, so i think the intelligence of an Ant colony emerges from a "distributed" intelligence, so an individual Ant can be specialized like in our kind of civilization, but even if an Ant is specialized and he can be viewed as much less capable of constructing the intelligence of an Ant colony, the distributed intelligence of the Ant colony can make emerge the intelligence of an Ant colony, so i think that time is the same, the individual subatomic of time can be like more specialized, but all the subatomic layer can give emergence to time as we know it and to relativity of time.
 
More of my philosophy about what is time as we know it..
 
I think i am smart, and i think you know me much more now, and now
i will explain my point of view of what is time as we know it:
 
I think time that is relative as has said it Albert Einstein is an "emergence", so it is like an Ant colony, so if you look at an individual Ant in its colony you will like say that he is like disorder that will not be able to construct what constructs an Ant colony, so then the Ant colony is an "emergence" of intelligence, it is like the stomach of a human that is also an emergence of a kind of intelligence that knows how to process food, so i think time that is relative as has said it Einstein is also an "emergence", but when you look at time individually from the subatomic point of view you will like say that it is a disorder that can not construct the time that we know it, and it is by logical analogy like the example of the individual Ant above, but i think that the all subatomic layer has made "emerge" time as we know it, and it is like the emergence of intelligence of an Ant colony.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)