Friday, September 22, 2023

Digest for comp.lang.c++@googlegroups.com - 1 update in 1 topic

Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org>: Sep 22 06:31PM -0400

On 9/22/23 8:15 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
 
> We're talking about if everything different like a mutex is acceptable
> here. And it isn't. Yielding might have a too high delay under load
> and spinning is dangerous in userspace because of what I've said.
 
Which, since it has been explained WHY your arguments are just wrong,
showing that you don't know what you are talking about, since all your
arguements are against "Strawmen" and not the actual thing being talked
about, you are just showing your ignorance.
 
You seem to be claiming that because you can't figure out a reasonable
way to do it with what you understand, the Standard needs to be changed
to allow provide lessor promises to the programmer.
 
Since there ARE implementation that actually meet the requirements, you
are obviously wrong that they can't be meet with a "reasonable" performance.
 
The fact that you are too stupid to understand how these things actually
work and give performant results doesn't mean they don't do it. The fact
that they do shows your ignorance.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

No comments: