comp.lang.c++@googlegroups.com | Google Groups | ![]() |
Unsure why you received this message? You previously subscribed to digests from this group, but we haven't been sending them for a while. We fixed that, but if you don't want to get these messages, send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
- Available C++ Libraries FAQ - 1 Update
- Scott Meyers' new book available (as download) now - 5 Updates
- int to string conversion tests + faster version (post 2) - 2 Updates
Nikki Locke <nikki@trumphurst.com>: Nov 14 11:22PM Available C++ Libraries FAQ URL: http://www.trumphurst.com/cpplibs/ This is a searchable list of libraries and utilities (both free and commercial) available to C++ programmers. If you know of a library which is not in the list, why not fill in the form at http://www.trumphurst.com/cpplibs/cppsub.php Maintainer: Nikki Locke cpplibs@trumphurst.com |
JiiPee <no@notvalid.com>: Nov 14 08:20PM On 14/11/2014 14:16, Robert Hutchings wrote: > http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033707.do > You can also use PayPal to buy. Paperback will be out in December. So will be propably my christmas gift. But why one needs to buy pdf and paperback both of them? Does not make sense to me if its one person reading both of them... It like listening music from the CD and then copy it to mp3 to listen at car - surely not make sense buy 2 licenses to listen your album. One product one price! |
Robert Hutchings <rm.hutchings@gmail.com>: Nov 14 03:13PM -0600 On 11/14/2014 2:20 PM, JiiPee wrote: > music from the CD and then copy it to mp3 to listen at car - surely not > make sense buy 2 licenses to listen your album. > One product one price! You don't need to buy both. I bought the download and will not buy the paperback. |
JiiPee <no@notvalid.com>: Nov 14 09:17PM On 14/11/2014 21:13, Robert Hutchings wrote: >> One product one price! > You don't need to buy both. I bought the download and will not buy > the paperback. I definitely prefer the paperback... but just saying would be nice to be able to read it on computer as well, but then they ask more money which sounds illogical as I have a licence to read it I think. |
red floyd <no.spam@its.invalid>: Nov 14 01:18PM -0800 On 11/14/2014 1:13 PM, Robert Hutchings wrote: >> One product one price! > You don't need to buy both. I bought the download and will not buy the > paperback. Different strokes. I bought the dead trees, because I hate e-books. Personal taste. |
JiiPee <no@notvalid.com>: Nov 14 10:18PM On 14/11/2014 21:18, red floyd wrote: >> paperback. > Different strokes. I bought the dead trees, because I hate e-books. > Personal taste. I think books are still better for eyes. Maybe computers get better in the future, but the colors etc are better when reading a paper book. The "feeling" is thus better... |
JiiPee <no@notvalid.com>: Nov 14 07:44PM On 14/11/2014 19:33, Scott Lurndal wrote: > Not on my system. ULONG_MAX here is: > $ printf "%u\n" $(( 0xffffffffffffffff )) > 18446744073709551615 But on my system it is.... > Most modern systems are 64-bit, and unsigned long is 64-bit. snprintf will > even take an unsigned long long, which is a 64-bit value on 32-bit CPU's > and the gnu compilers offer 128-bit scalar types (__int128_t, __uint128_t). But it does not take longer than build in types, which is unsigned long long, isnt it? And that was the point. |
JiiPee <no@notvalid.com>: Nov 14 07:48PM On 14/11/2014 19:44, JiiPee wrote: >> __uint128_t). > But it does not take longer than build in types, which is unsigned > long long, isnt it? And that was the point. Because whatever build in types we use (even int128), then surely my function also can handle them. So it does not change the "setting" . The question was more like, that can snprintf and others convert bigger integers than my function. And seems like no... |
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment