Digest for comp.lang.c++@googlegroups.com - 5 updates in 3 topics

comp.lang.c++@googlegroups.com

Google Groups

Topic digest
View all topics

• inheritance in C++ - 3 Updates
• The namespace "::std" (was: inheritance in C++) - 1 Update
• begin and end as non-member functions - 1 Update

inheritance in C++

Luca Risolia <luca.risolia@linux-projects.org>: Apr 27 10:39PM +0200 > What do you keep prepending std:: with all those pedantic ::?   *Why

Luca Risolia <luca.risolia@linux-projects.org>: Apr 27 11:18PM +0200 Il 27/04/2015 23:14, Stefan Ram ha scritto: > If you already know that they are »pedantic«, > why should I care to explain?   It was a rhetorical question... :)

Christopher Pisz <nospam@notanaddress.com>: Apr 27 06:11PM -0500 On 4/27/2015 4:18 PM, Luca Risolia wrote: >> If you already know that they are »pedantic«, >> why should I care to explain?   > It was a rhetorical question... :)   What does the adjective mean? Google says, "Like a pendant"... but it also says synonyms are meticulous, precise, and exact.   Do we mean he know he doesn't need to put :: before std, but does it anyway because of some sort of OCD-ed-ness? Just because he knows the std namespace is global?     -- I have chosen to troll filter/ignore all subthreads containing the words: "Rick C. Hodgins", "Flibble", and "Islam" So, I won't be able to see or respond to any such messages ---

Back to top

The namespace "::std" (was: inheritance in C++)

ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram): Apr 27 09:14PM >Il 27/04/2015 17:36, Stefan Ram ha scritto: >>using namespace ::std::literals; >What do you keep prepending std:: with all those pedantic ::?   If you already know that they are »pedantic«, why should I care to explain?   When you bring up a new subject, create a new thread or at least adjust the subject line!

Back to top

begin and end as non-member functions

Luca Risolia <luca.risolia@linux-projects.org>: Apr 20 03:07PM +0200 On 20/04/2015 14:53, Paul wrote: > Please can someone explain why the second version does not compile even though the first one does? The error is "no matching function for call to end(int*&)"   because the array parameter "decays" into a pointer, for which there is no matching end() function declared.

Back to top

You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.