- Stackoverflow - a fascist web-site. - 6 Updates
- Is this an implicit use of the template? - 1 Update
| Vlad from Moscow <vlad.moscow@mail.ru>: Nov 07 12:26PM -0800 I encountered that the Stackoverflow is providing an openly discriminatory policy now and even does not try to hide this. My entirely correct answers are purposely down-voted. Here is a refernce to such a question. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/33583478/comparing-strings-with-if-else/33583572#33583572 Sometimes it can be that somebody does not agree with your answer. But usually he points the reason of the disagreement in his comment and I can provide a reference to the C Standard that to prove my point of view. But the problem is nobody needs my reference. The purpose is to down-vote the answer. I tried to attract attention of moderators but all was in vain. On the other hand if I down-vote somebody's incorrect answer and even write in a comment what is wrong in the answer then instantly a complain follows to moderators and I am banned. As I was already said several times at the same Stackoverflow the problem is that I am from Russia and this is clear from my nickname Vlad from Moscow. I asked a question at Meta that to discuss the situation but again I was ignored and my question was just removed. So I am again banned after my correct answer was deliberately down-voted and after I asked a question how to behave in such situations.:) |
| Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com>: Nov 07 09:33PM +0100 On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 12:26:14 -0800 (PST) > I encountered that the Stackoverflow is providing an openly > discriminatory policy now and even does not try to hide this. Almost all web forums are shit, I avoid them. Unfortunately usenet is dying because of ISP's... |
| Vlad from Moscow <vlad.moscow@mail.ru>: Nov 07 01:05PM -0800 On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 11:34:14 PM UTC+3, Melzzzzz wrote: > > discriminatory policy now and even does not try to hide this. > Almost all web forums are shit, I avoid them. Unfortunately usenet is > dying because of ISP's... In my case all is done without any ceremony. Now if somebody finds this reference in the internet and sees that a correct answer was down-voted he will conclude that stackoverflow is a a forum of dummies.:) |
| Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee>: Nov 07 04:58PM -0600 Vlad from Moscow <vlad.moscow@mail.ru> wrote in > I encountered that the Stackoverflow is providing an openly > discriminatory policy now and even does not try to hide this. > My entirely correct answers are purposely down-voted. Fascism is defined as "a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, ...". so in this case, who is this dictator, in your mind? If you get down-voted, then this most probably means you are dealing with a democracy, not with fascism. Note that in democracy the voters need to like you and (to some extent) what you are saying, the truth is not so important (albeit a little more important than in fascism). Also note that the voters might probably like you more if your name does not trigger negative associations with all the other daily input the voters receive. |
| Luca Risolia <luca.risolia@linux-projects.org>: Nov 08 12:11AM +0100 Il 07/11/2015 23:58, Paavo Helde ha scritto: > Fascism is defined as "a governmental system led by a dictator having > complete power, ...". so in this case, who is this dictator, in your mind? it's more an ideology than a "governmental system led by a dictator" |
| Vlad from Moscow <vlad.moscow@mail.ru>: Nov 07 03:22PM -0800 On Sunday, November 8, 2015 at 1:59:00 AM UTC+3, Paavo Helde wrote: > (albeit a little more important than in fascism). Also note that the voters > might probably like you more if your name does not trigger negative > associations with all the other daily input the voters receive. I wonder how many double standards there are in the West! Well, then let you will be banned here because you are not from Russia and I do not like your answers. It will be indeed the democracy, is not it?:) I may down vote your answers you may not. I may ban you because I do not like your answers or questions you may not. It is a good democracy. I like it. When will we start to carry out the democracy?:) |
| Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid>: Nov 06 08:03PM -0500 On 11/4/2015 4:10 AM, Juha Nieminen wrote: > impose that requirement, even if you deliberately tried to do so. > Except perhaps have std::cout declared in one, and its operators > in the other. At least that's how the Standard used to define those. <iostream> had the declarations of the objects, and the classes were in the other header. Do you think Alf and red were making it up? V -- I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment