- More explanation about scalability.. - 2 Updates
- I think we have to be more smart about scalability.. - 1 Update
- My new and final logical proof about scalability.. - 1 Update
- More logical proof about scalability - 1 Update
- My final thoughts about scalability.. - 1 Update
- I think i have to do more philosophy about scalability.. - 1 Update
- Read again, i correct a last typo - 1 Update
- About Multi-channel memory architecture and my Parallel Sort Library.. - 1 Update
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Mar 28 11:23AM -0700 Hello, Read this: More explanation about scalability.. As you have noticed i said below the following: "The scalability of my Parallel Sort Library in the mergesort mode will go to around 12X" You have to distinguish between the scalability that is the combination of scalibility of hardware and software, and the scalability that is only software or only hardware. So you have to know that i am speaking below about the "total" scalability of both the hardware(from one channel memory to 8 channels memory) and software on actual Intel and AMD processors, but 3D stacking of memory will give much more scalability. Read again: About Multi-channel memory architecture and my Parallel Sort Library.. On actual Intel and AMD processors data is moved from and to main memory only in 64 bytes chunks, so in a 8 channels of a Multi-channel memory architecture in a ganged mode, i think that the memory speed of my Parallel Sort library in the mergesort mode will go to 8X speed, and the actual scalability of my Parallel Sort Library in the mergesort mode will go to around 12X. So i will advice you to use the ganged mode of the Multi-channel memory architecture because it works great. My Parallel Sort Library was updated to version 3.64 I have enhanced it more, and i think it is stable and fast and it scales more. You can download it from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/parallel-sort-library Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Mar 29 04:35AM -0700 Hello... More explanation about scalability.. I said yesterday the following: "What do you think is an idea in philosophy ? An idea in philosophy can be immaterial or material. So if an idea is immaterial , we will not allow the definition of an idea as a running idea that is physical, but if it is material we will allow the definition of an idea as a running idea that is physical, this is the basis of logic. So more importantly we can define a software as only ideas that we think with our logical reasoning and minds, so with this we will exclude in the definition the software as a running software that is physical, but we can also define a software as a running ideas that are material so that we can define a software as a running software that is material and also with its ideas that are immaterial. But i think that the right definition is also to include the running software that is physical as the definition of a software." To be "convinced" of my above writing, we can notice that from the running hardware we can extract the ideas of the software(or the software), so from empiricism we can get rationalism. Read the rest of my previous thoughts: I think we have to be more smart about scalability.. I think we have to understand philosophy correctly: What do you think is an idea in philosophy ? An idea in philosophy can be immaterial or material. So if an idea is immaterial , we will not allow the definition of an idea as a running idea that is physical, but if it is material we will allow the definition of an idea as a running idea that is physical, this is the basis of logic. So more importantly we can define a software as only ideas that we think with our logical reasoning and minds, so with this we will exclude in the definition the software as a running software that is physical, but we can also define a software as a running ideas that are material so that we can define a software as a running software that is material and also with its ideas that are immaterial. But i think that the right definition is also to include the running software that is physical as the definition of a software and this is why i wrote the following in my previous writing about scalability: My new and final logical proof about scalability.. I have proved below that: "An understanding of a concept is a running concept" But i have to be more smart, so follow me: What do you think is an idea ? Since: "An understanding of a concept is a running concept" So an idea too is a running idea. But what is a software ? A software is composed of a running software and text of a oftware. But since a software is a running software too, so the running software is the hardware, so software scalability is the concept and also the running software scalability that is the hardware, so we can infer logically that even if the program is single threaded and it runs on a more powerful hardware, the running software scalability will be the new more powerful hardware that compose the running software scalability, thus my logical proof is complete. Read the rest of my previous thoughts to understand more: More logical proof about scalability: I will now prove the following to be able for you to see the big picture, i said the following: "An understanding of a concept is a running concept" My logical proof of it is the following: You have to read first my previous writing below that say the following: "In political philosophy we have what we call the "concept" of democracy,but we have to know that the concept of democracy that is understood by our mind and consciousness is a "running" concept of democracy, i mean a running concept of democracy in our mind." So as you are noticing consciousness and understanding of the concept of democracy is a running concept of democracy, so this part is logical from the above, so we can logically infer that: "An understanding of a concept is a running concept", because the understanding of a concept comes from a running concept of our mind and consciousness and it comes from the running concept of the outside reality, so it is in both a running concept, hence logically we can say: "An understanding of a concept is a running concept". Read my previous following thoughts to understand: My final thoughts about scalability.. I think that i am like proving the following: An understanding of a concept is a running concept, because to be able to be an understanding of a concept there must be a running concept, and the running concept permits us to measure the running concept, so the running concept of democracy permits us to say that "democracy" is good or not, that's the same for software scalability, because the software scalability is also the running concept of software scalability that permits us to measure the running concept of scalability, so we can finally say that software scalability is also the running software scalability , and this running concept of software scalability is the new "speed" of the software relatively to the old speed, and the old speed can be fixed here or there in the reference of time. Read the rest of my previous thoughts to understand more: I think i have to do more philosophy about scalability.. I said the following: "The actual scalability of my Parallel Sort Library in the mergesort mode will go to around 12X" In political philosophy we have what we call the "concept" of democracy, but we have to know that the concept of democracy that is understood by our mind and consciousness is a "running" concept of democracy, i mean a running concept of democracy in our mind. That's the same for software scalability, software scalability is not just the concept, software scalability is also the running concept of software scalability, and this running concept of software scalability is the new "speed" of the software relatively to the old speed, and the old speed can be fixed here or there in the reference of time, this is why when i say that: "The actual scalability of my Parallel Sort Library in the mergesort mode will go to around 12X" It also means the "running" concept of scalability. So read my below previous writing to understand more: More explanation about scalability.. As you have noticed i said below the following: "The actual scalability of my Parallel Sort Library in the mergesort mode will go to around 12X" You have to distinguish between the scalability that is the combination of scalability of hardware and software, and the scalability that is only software or only hardware. So you have to know that i am speaking below about the "total" scalability of both the hardware(from one channel memory to 8 channels memory) and software on actual Intel and AMD processors, but 3D stacking of memory will give much more scalability. Read again: About Multi-channel memory architecture and my Parallel Sort Library.. On actual Intel and AMD processors data is moved from and to main memory only in 64 bytes chunks, so in a 8 channels of a Multi-channel memory architecture in a ganged mode, i think that the memory speed of my Parallel Sort library in the mergesort mode will go to 8X speed, and the actual scalability of my Parallel Sort Library in the mergesort mode will go to around 12X. So i will advice you to use the ganged mode of the Multi-channel memory architecture because it works great. My Parallel Sort Library was updated to version 3.64 I have enhanced it more, and i think it is stable and fast and it scales more. You can download it from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/parallel-sort-library Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Mar 28 05:09PM -0700 Hello... Read this: I think we have to be more smart about scalability.. I think we have to understand philosophy correctly: What do you think is an idea in philosophy ? An idea in philosophy can be immaterial or material. So if an idea is immaterial , we will not allow the definition of an idea as a running idea that is physical, but if it is material we will allow the definition of an idea as a running idea that is physical, this is the basis of logic. So more importantly we can define a software as only ideas that we think with our logical reasoning and minds, so with this we will exclude in the definition the software as a running software that is physical, but we can also define a software as a running ideas that are material so that we can define a software as a running software that is material and also with its ideas that are immaterial. But i think that the the right definition is also to include the running software that is physical as the definition of a software and this is why i wrote the following in my previous writing about scalability: My new and final logical proof about scalability.. I have proved below that: "An understanding of a concept is a running concept" But i have to be more smart, so follow me: What do you think is an idea ? Since: "An understanding of a concept is a running concept" So an idea too is a running idea. But what is a software ? A software is composed of a running software and text of a oftware. But since a software is a running software too, so the running software is the hardware, so software scalability is the concept and also the running software scalability that is the hardware, so we can infer logically that even if the program is single threaded and it runs on a more powerful hardware, the running software scalability will be the new more powerful hardware that compose the running software scalability, thus my logical proof is complete. Read the rest of my previous thoughts to understand more: More logical proof about scalability: I will now prove the following to be able for you to see the big picture, i said the following: "An understanding of a concept is a running concept" My logical proof of it is the following: You have to read first my previous writing below that say the following: "In political philosophy we have what we call the "concept" of democracy,but we have to know that the concept of democracy that is understood by our mind and consciousness is a "running" concept of democracy, i mean a running concept of democracy in our mind." So as you are noticing consciousness and understanding of the concept of democracy is a running concept of democracy, so this part is logical from the above, so we can logically infer that: "An understanding of a concept is a running concept", because the understanding of a concept comes from a running concept of our mind and consciousness and it comes from the running concept of the outside reality, so it is in both a running concept, hence logically we can say: "An understanding of a concept is a running concept". Read my previous following thoughts to understand: My final thoughts about scalability.. I think that i am like proving the following: An understanding of a concept is a running concept, because to be able to be an understanding of a concept there must be a running concept, and the running concept permits us to measure the running concept, so the running concept of democracy permits us to say that "democracy" is good or not, that's the same for software scalability, because the software scalability is also the running concept of software scalability that permits us to measure the running concept of scalability, so we can finally say that software scalability is also the running software scalability , and this running concept of software scalability is the new "speed" of the software relatively to the old speed, and the old speed can be fixed here or there in the reference of time. Read the rest of my previous thoughts to understand more: I think i have to do more philosophy about scalability.. I said the following: "The actual scalability of my Parallel Sort Library in the mergesort mode will go to around 12X" In political philosophy we have what we call the "concept" of democracy, but we have to know that the concept of democracy that is understood by our mind and consciousness is a "running" concept of democracy, i mean a running concept of democracy in our mind. That's the same for software scalability, software scalability is not just the concept, software scalability is also the running concept of software scalability, and this running concept of software scalability is the new "speed" of the software relatively to the old speed, and the old speed can be fixed here or there in the reference of time, this is why when i say that: "The actual scalability of my Parallel Sort Library in the mergesort mode will go to around 12X" It also means the "running" concept of scalability. So read my below previous writing to understand more: More explanation about scalability.. As you have noticed i said below the following: "The actual scalability of my Parallel Sort Library in the mergesort mode will go to around 12X" You have to distinguish between the scalability that is the combination of scalability of hardware and software, and the scalability that is only software or only hardware. So you have to know that i am speaking below about the "total" scalability of both the hardware(from one channel memory to 8 channels memory) and software on actual Intel and AMD processors, but 3D stacking of memory will give much more scalability. Read again: About Multi-channel memory architecture and my Parallel Sort Library.. On actual Intel and AMD processors data is moved from and to main memory only in 64 bytes chunks, so in a 8 channels of a Multi-channel memory architecture in a ganged mode, i think that the memory speed of my Parallel Sort library in the mergesort mode will go to 8X speed, and the actual scalability of my Parallel Sort Library in the mergesort mode will go to around 12X. So i will advice you to use the ganged mode of the Multi-channel memory architecture because it works great. My Parallel Sort Library was updated to version 3.64 I have enhanced it more, and i think it is stable and fast and it scales more. You can download it from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/parallel-sort-library Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Mar 28 04:10PM -0700 Hello... Read this: My new and final logical proof about scalability.. I have proved below that: "An understanding of a concept is a running concept" But i have to be more smart, so follow me: What do you think is an idea ? Since: "An understanding of a concept is a running concept" So an idea too is a running idea. But what is a software ? A software is composed of a running software and text of a oftware. But since a software is a running software too, so the running software is the hardware, so software scalability is the concept and also the running software scalability that is the hardware, so we can infer logically that even if the program is single threaded and it runs on a more powerful hardware, the running software scalability will be the new more powerful hardware that compose the running software scalability, thus my logical proof is complete. Read the rest of my previous thoughts to understand more: More logical proof about scalability: I will now prove the following to be able for you to see the big picture, i said the following: "An understanding of a concept is a running concept" My logical proof of it is the following: You have to read first my previous writing below that say the following: "In political philosophy we have what we call the "concept" of democracy,but we have to know that the concept of democracy that is understood by our mind and consciousness is a "running" concept of democracy, i mean a running concept of democracy in our mind." So as you are noticing consciousness and understanding of the concept of democracy is a running concept of democracy, so this part is logical from the above, so we can logically infer that: "An understanding of a concept is a running concept", because the understanding of a concept comes from a running concept of our mind and consciousness and it comes from the running concept of the outside reality, so it is in both a running concept, hence logically we can say: "An understanding of a concept is a running concept". Read my previous following thoughts to understand: My final thoughts about scalability.. I think that i am like proving the following: An understanding of a concept is a running concept, because to be able to be an understanding of a concept there must be a running concept, and the running concept permits us to measure the running concept, so the running concept of democracy permits us to say that "democracy" is good or not, that's the same for software scalability, because the software scalability is also the running concept of software scalability that permits us to measure the running concept of scalability, so we can finally say that software scalability is also the running software scalability , and this running concept of software scalability is the new "speed" of the software relatively to the old speed, and the old speed can be fixed here or there in the reference of time. Read the rest of my previous thoughts to understand more: I think i have to do more philosophy about scalability.. I said the following: "The actual scalability of my Parallel Sort Library in the mergesort mode will go to around 12X" In political philosophy we have what we call the "concept" of democracy, but we have to know that the concept of democracy that is understood by our mind and consciousness is a "running" concept of democracy, i mean a running concept of democracy in our mind. That's the same for software scalability, software scalability is not just the concept, software scalability is also the running concept of software scalability, and this running concept of software scalability is the new "speed" of the software relatively to the old speed, and the old speed can be fixed here or there in the reference of time, this is why when i say that: "The actual scalability of my Parallel Sort Library in the mergesort mode will go to around 12X" It also means the "running" concept of scalability. So read my below previous writing to understand more: More explanation about scalability.. As you have noticed i said below the following: "The actual scalability of my Parallel Sort Library in the mergesort mode will go to around 12X" You have to distinguish between the scalability that is the combination of scalability of hardware and software, and the scalability that is only software or only hardware. So you have to know that i am speaking below about the "total" scalability of both the hardware(from one channel memory to 8 channels memory) and software on actual Intel and AMD processors, but 3D stacking of memory will give much more scalability. Read again: About Multi-channel memory architecture and my Parallel Sort Library.. On actual Intel and AMD processors data is moved from and to main memory only in 64 bytes chunks, so in a 8 channels of a Multi-channel memory architecture in a ganged mode, i think that the memory speed of my Parallel Sort library in the mergesort mode will go to 8X speed, and the actual scalability of my Parallel Sort Library in the mergesort mode will go to around 12X. So i will advice you to use the ganged mode of the Multi-channel memory architecture because it works great. My Parallel Sort Library was updated to version 3.64 I have enhanced it more, and i think it is stable and fast and it scales more. You can download it from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/parallel-sort-library Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Mar 28 03:14PM -0700 Hello... Read this: More logical proof about scalability: I will now prove the following to be able for you to see the big picture, i said the following: "An understanding of a concept is a running concept" My logical proof of it is the following: You have to read first my previous writing below that say the following: "In political philosophy we have what we call the "concept" of democracy,but we have to know that the concept of democracy that is understood by our mind and consciousness is a "running" concept of democracy, i mean a running concept of democracy in our mind." So as you are noticing consciousness and understanding of the concept of democracy is a running concept of democracy, so this part is logical from the above, so we can logically infer that: "An understanding of a concept is a running concept", because the understanding of a concept comes from a running concept of our mind and consciousness and it comes from the running concept of the outside reality, so it is in both a running concept, hence logically we can say: "An understanding of a concept is a running concept". Read my previous following thoughts to understand: My final thoughts about scalability.. I think that i am like proving the following: An understanding of a concept is a running concept, because to be able to be an understanding of a concept there must be a running concept, and the running concept permits us to measure the running concept, so the running concept of democracy permits us to say that "democracy" is good or not, that's the same for software scalability, because the software scalability is also the running concept of software scalability that permits us to measure the running concept of scalability, so we can finally say that software scalability is also the running software scalability , and this running concept of software scalability is the new "speed" of the software relatively to the old speed, and the old speed can be fixed here or there in the reference of time. Read the rest of my previous thoughts to understand more: I think i have to do more philosophy about scalability.. I said the following: "The actual scalability of my Parallel Sort Library in the mergesort mode will go to around 12X" In political philosophy we have what we call the "concept" of democracy, but we have to know that the concept of democracy that is understood by our mind and consciousness is a "running" concept of democracy, i mean a running concept of democracy in our mind. That's the same for software scalability, software scalability is not just the concept, software scalability is also the running concept of software scalability, and this running concept of software scalability is the new "speed" of the software relatively to the old speed, and the old speed can be fixed here or there in the reference of time, this is why when i say that: "The actual scalability of my Parallel Sort Library in the mergesort mode will go to around 12X" It also means the "running" concept of scalability. So read my below previous writing to understand more: More explanation about scalability.. As you have noticed i said below the following: "The actual scalability of my Parallel Sort Library in the mergesort mode will go to around 12X" You have to distinguish between the scalability that is the combination of scalability of hardware and software, and the scalability that is only software or only hardware. So you have to know that i am speaking below about the "total" scalability of both the hardware(from one channel memory to 8 channels memory) and software on actual Intel and AMD processors, but 3D stacking of memory will give much more scalability. Read again: About Multi-channel memory architecture and my Parallel Sort Library.. On actual Intel and AMD processors data is moved from and to main memory only in 64 bytes chunks, so in a 8 channels of a Multi-channel memory architecture in a ganged mode, i think that the memory speed of my Parallel Sort library in the mergesort mode will go to 8X speed, and the actual scalability of my Parallel Sort Library in the mergesort mode will go to around 12X. So i will advice you to use the ganged mode of the Multi-channel memory architecture because it works great. My Parallel Sort Library was updated to version 3.64 I have enhanced it more, and i think it is stable and fast and it scales more. You can download it from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/parallel-sort-library Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Mar 28 02:37PM -0700 Hello... Read this: My final thoughts about scalability.. I think that i am like proving the following: An understanding of a concept is a running concept, because to be able to be an understanding of a concept there must be a running concept, and the running concept permits us to measure the running concept, so the running concept of democracy permits us to say that "democracy" is good or not, that's the same for software scalability, because the software scalability is also the running concept of software scalability that permits us to measure the running concept of scalability, so we can finally say that software scalability is also the running software scalability , and this running concept of software scalability is the new "speed" of the software relatively to the old speed, and the old speed can be fixed here or there in the reference of time. Read the rest of my previous thoughts to understand more: I think i have to do more philosophy about scalability.. I said the following: "The actual scalability of my Parallel Sort Library in the mergesort mode will go to around 12X" In political philosophy we have what we call the "concept" of democracy, but we have to know that the concept of democracy that is understood by our mind and consciousness is a "running" concept of democracy, i mean a running concept of democracy in our mind. That's the same for software scalability, software scalability is not just the concept, software scalability is also the running concept of software scalability, and this running concept of software scalability is the new "speed" of the software relatively to the old speed, and the old speed can be fixed here or there in the reference of time, this is why when i say that: "The actual scalability of my Parallel Sort Library in the mergesort mode will go to around 12X" It also means the "running" concept of scalability. So read my below previous writing to understand more: More explanation about scalability.. As you have noticed i said below the following: "The actual scalability of my Parallel Sort Library in the mergesort mode will go to around 12X" You have to distinguish between the scalability that is the combination of scalability of hardware and software, and the scalability that is only software or only hardware. So you have to know that i am speaking below about the "total" scalability of both the hardware(from one channel memory to 8 channels memory) and software on actual Intel and AMD processors, but 3D stacking of memory will give much more scalability. Read again: About Multi-channel memory architecture and my Parallel Sort Library.. On actual Intel and AMD processors data is moved from and to main memory only in 64 bytes chunks, so in a 8 channels of a Multi-channel memory architecture in a ganged mode, i think that the memory speed of my Parallel Sort library in the mergesort mode will go to 8X speed, and the actual scalability of my Parallel Sort Library in the mergesort mode will go to around 12X. So i will advice you to use the ganged mode of the Multi-channel memory architecture because it works great. My Parallel Sort Library was updated to version 3.64 I have enhanced it more, and i think it is stable and fast and it scales more. You can download it from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/parallel-sort-library Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Mar 28 01:29PM -0700 Hello.. I think i have to do more philosophy about scalability.. I said the following: "The actual scalability of my Parallel Sort Library in the mergesort mode will go to around 12X" In political philosophy we have what we call the "concept" of democracy, but we have to know that the concept of democracy that is understood by our mind and consciousness is a "running" concept of democracy, i mean a running concept of democracy in our mind. That's the same for software scalability, software scalability is not just the concept, software scalability is also the running concept of software scalability, and this running concept of software scalability is the new "speed" of the software relatively to the old speed, and the old speed can be fixed here or there in the reference of time, this is why when i say that: "The actual scalability of my Parallel Sort Library in the mergesort mode will go to around 12X" It also means the "running" concept of scalability. So read my below previous writing to understand more: More explanation about scalability.. As you have noticed i said below the following: "The actual scalability of my Parallel Sort Library in the mergesort mode will go to around 12X" You have to distinguish between the scalability that is the combination of scalability of hardware and software, and the scalability that is only software or only hardware. So you have to know that i am speaking below about the "total" scalability of both the hardware(from one channel memory to 8 channels memory) and software on actual Intel and AMD processors, but 3D stacking of memory will give much more scalability. Read again: About Multi-channel memory architecture and my Parallel Sort Library.. On actual Intel and AMD processors data is moved from and to main memory only in 64 bytes chunks, so in a 8 channels of a Multi-channel memory architecture in a ganged mode, i think that the memory speed of my Parallel Sort library in the mergesort mode will go to 8X speed, and the actual scalability of my Parallel Sort Library in the mergesort mode will go to around 12X. So i will advice you to use the ganged mode of the Multi-channel memory architecture because it works great. My Parallel Sort Library was updated to version 3.64 I have enhanced it more, and i think it is stable and fast and it scales more. You can download it from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/parallel-sort-library Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Mar 28 11:32AM -0700 Hello... Read again, i correct a last typo: More explanation about scalability.. As you have noticed i said below the following: "The scalability of my Parallel Sort Library in the mergesort mode will go to around 12X" You have to distinguish between the scalability that is the combination of scalability of hardware and software, and the scalability that is only software or only hardware. So you have to know that i am speaking below about the "total" scalability of both the hardware(from one channel memory to 8 channels memory) and software on actual Intel and AMD processors, but 3D stacking of memory will give much more scalability. Read again: About Multi-channel memory architecture and my Parallel Sort Library.. On actual Intel and AMD processors data is moved from and to main memory only in 64 bytes chunks, so in a 8 channels of a Multi-channel memory architecture in a ganged mode, i think that the memory speed of my Parallel Sort library in the mergesort mode will go to 8X speed, and the actual scalability of my Parallel Sort Library in the mergesort mode will go to around 12X. So i will advice you to use the ganged mode of the Multi-channel memory architecture because it works great. My Parallel Sort Library was updated to version 3.64 I have enhanced it more, and i think it is stable and fast and it scales more. You can download it from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/parallel-sort-library Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Mar 28 11:02AM -0700 Hello.. About Multi-channel memory architecture and my Parallel Sort Library.. On actual Intel and AMD processors data is moved from and to main memory only in 64 bytes chunks, so in a 8 channels of a Multi-channel memory architecture in a ganged mode, i think that the memory speed of my Parallel Sort library in the mergesort mode will go to 8X speed, and the scalability of my Parallel Sort Library in the mergesort mode will go to around 12X. So i will advice you to use the ganged mode of the Multi-channel memory architecture because it works great. My Parallel Sort Library was updated to version 3.64 I have enhanced it more, and i think it is stable and fast and it scales more. You can download it from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/parallel-sort-library Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment