- I Am Thinking About You - 1 Update
- I have just decided to write the following poem of Love - 1 Update
- The 6 most pressing environmental issues—and what you can do to help solve them - 1 Update
- Don't worry about my posts of my poems - 1 Update
- Here is my other new poem of Love - 1 Update
- Here is another new poem of Love of mine that is much better now - 1 Update
- Don't worry about my posts about my political philosophy - 1 Update
- I correct some of my thoughts of my political philosophy, read again.. - 1 Update
- More thoughts of my political philosophy.. - 1 Update
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jul 18 05:03PM -0700 Hello.. Read this: I have just decided to write the following poem of Love, here it is: I Am Thinking About You Since you are my so beautiful Tattoo I Am Thinking About You Since our love between me and you is like a beautiful glue I Am Thinking About You Since it's not a Zoo but our beautiful avenue I Am Thinking About You Since i love to see you washing your hair with a beautiful shampoo I Am Thinking About You Since we are peace and love and not the way of the kung-fu I Am Thinking About You And is our love a Marabout or a Voodoo or a Vishnu? I Am Thinking About You Since our love is a so beautiful virtue ! Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jul 18 04:34PM -0700 Hello... Read this: I have just decided to write the following poem of Love, here it is: I've Been Thinking About You Since you are my so beautiful Tattoo I've Been Thinking About You Since our love between me and you is like a beautiful glue I've Been Thinking About You Since it's not a Zoo but our beautiful avenue I've Been Thinking About You Since i love to see you washing your hair with a beautiful shampoo I've Been Thinking About You Since we are peace and love and not the way of the kung-fu I've Been Thinking About You And is our love a Marabout or a Voodoo or a Vishnu? I've Been Thinking About You Since our love is a so beautiful virtue ! Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jul 18 12:44PM -0700 Hello, The 6 most pressing environmental issues—and what you can do to help solve them: 1- CLIMATE CHANGE 2- POLLUTION 3- DEFORESTATION 4- WATER SCARCITY 5- LOSS OF BIODIVERSITY 6- SOIL EROSION AND DEGRADATION Read more here: https://inhabitat.com/top-6-environmental-issues-for-earth-day-and-what-you-can-do-to-solve-them/ About hydrogen cars.. Because it's non-polluting, hydrogen seems like the ideal fuel for the 21st century. A lot of people in the government and the auto industry are excited about its potential. Hydrogen cars have the potential to be fuel-efficient and offer the hope of eco-friendly, green driving. Seawater could bring breakthrough for hydrogen cars Read more here: https://www.greencarreports.com/news/1122335_seawater-could-bring-breakthrough-for-hydrogen-cars When China's father of EVs starts talking up hydrogen vehicles, analysts say investors should pay attention EV celebrity Wan Gang says a 'hydrogen society' is ahead Read more here: https://www.scmp.com/business/markets/article/3017470/when-chinas-father-evs-starts-talking-hydrogen-vehicles-analysts Hydrogen-powered cars are the future. But are we ready? Hyundai Motor Group. "We are confident that hydrogen power will transcend the transportation sector and become a leading global economic success." Read more here: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/drive/technology/article-hydrogen-powered-cars-are-the-future-but-are-we-ready/ Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jul 18 12:15PM -0700 Hello, Don't worry about my posts of my poems, because i am just posting a very few posts of my poems. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jul 18 11:56AM -0700 Hello, I was just listening at the following song of Aaron Neville -La Vie Dansante https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtnb6GUfdSo And i have just decided to explain more my following poem of Love: So when i am saying in my poem of Love below the following: "But our love is consciousness of being truly rich" Is it that this love is "only" consciousness of being truly rich ? No, it isn't, because you have to place it in the "context" of "all" my poem of Love below, because as you are noticing, in my poem of Love, that i am also "enumerating" the characteristics of Love of the poem of Love below, so read it again to notice it: Here is my new poem of Love: I was just listening to the following song of DON'T KNOW MUCH (Lyrics) - LINDA RONSTADT / AARON NEVILLE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmuJ0us63GQ So i have just decided to write a poem of Love, and here it is: I don't know much But i am with your love getting in touch I don't know much But your love is not a judge I don't know much But like one we are like a so beautiful bridge I don't know much But our love is consciousness of being truly rich I don't know much But beauty is our forever niche I don't know much But our love is like love that forever enrich I don't know much So don't ask me why or which I don't know much But our love is perfection without a glitch ! Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jul 18 11:50AM -0700 Hello.. Here is another new poem of Love of mine that is much better now: I was just listening to the following: FRANK SINATRA - LOVE'S BEEN GOOD TO ME https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9pLpzNPiB48 So i have just decided to write a new poem, so here is my new poem: Love has been good Like parenthood and the motherhood Love has been good Like brotherhood that made us stood ! Love has been good Is it from wisdom and the insight or from the talmud ? Love has been good This is why Love is also like adulthood ! Love has been good It is why i am Love that has understood ! So it is magic That our encounter is not a panic It is magic That i am coming to you with a so beautiful classic It is magic That our love is like telepathic It is magic That our love is logic and beautifully romantic It is magic That my poetry is beautiful love and not the sarcastic It is magic That our love is a beautiful epidemic It is magic That our love is so beautifully galactic It is magic That our love is so great and that's magic ! Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jul 18 11:37AM -0700 Hello, Don't worry about my posts about my political philosophy, because i am just posting a very few posts about my political philosophy. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jul 18 11:34AM -0700 Hello... I correct some of my thoughts of my political philosophy, read again.. More thoughts of my political philosophy.. About white supremacism and neo-nazism.. I am more capable at political philosophy, and i think i understand the "defect" of white supremacism and neo-nazism, it is about "morality", and as i defined morality by two abstractions that are: Perfection at best and with Efficiency and the correct compassion and love that is inherent to efficiency (read more below to understand), so i think the defect of white supremacism and neo-nazism, is that they want to be white supremacism so they have the "tendency" like neo-nazism to be "radicalism" of "perfection" that is "too" violent with humans imperfections (but notice that we can not be confident with there violent behavior towards human imperfections), so they are like ideologies of radicalism that are evil over this earth, because they are not understanding the basis of our today civilization, our today civilization is also more patience and more tolerance and our today civilization is more positive because it believes that science and technology will soon be able to solve many of our problems because of the exponential progress and the law of accelerating returns that are so fast, so our today civilization is more positive and more confident, and read what i wrote before about being civilized: Now what is it to be civilized ? This is a smart question.. You have to understand deeply our kind of civilization to be able to answer this question, i think that our kind of civilization is wanting to "maximize" at best by "effort" the avoidance of savagery even if we are still savagery here and there, you have to be able able to understand how to prioritize to be able to succeed ! i think that our kind of civilization is giving a weight of great importance to the fact of avoiding savagery at best by effort, so this principle doesn't contradict the fact that even if we are still savagery here and there we have to maximize at best the avoidance of savagery by "effort", and also this principle has to be in accordance with the fact that we have to be the right "stability" to be able to call a society a society or a country a country, so this is why we are noticing that we are being a kind of "tolerance" and we are a social system and we are a health care system in our kind of civilization. So to be in accordance with the principle above you are understanding that we have to be efficient and much organized to be able to be this principle in action, this is why i am not in accordance with neo-nazism or white supremacism, because they are inferiority of morality that doesn't understand the requirements of our today "civilization", so white supremacists and neo-nazis have to adapt because they are too much violence. Read the rest of my thoughts to understand better: Yet about meritocracy and elitism.. I wrote previously the following: "More political philosophy about Elitism and Meritocracy.. The question is not do we have to have Elitism and Meritocracy, because we have to have Elitism and Meritocracy. But the question is: "what" kind of Elitism do we have to have and "what kind of meritocracy do we have to have ? Because as you are noticing that i said below: "You have to distinguish between this Elitism and that Elitism , i mean that there is not correct Elitism that hates inferiority of people and has the tendency to not get along with people, but i am not this Elitism"" And to be more "smart" look "carefully" at my following poem that i wrote previously that talks about the above problem: === Look at the more "individual" perfection It can become an imperfection Since more "awareness" of imperfections that is more individual perfection Can make us hate and discriminate our imperfections And since we are many of us made also of imperfections So this can make "us" more disorganized and less perfection And that's an "important" problem that needs an "attention" So this is why morality is calling for "actions" This is why laws are our security and a right prevention And this weakness must become a beautiful ascension So you have to see it better in many more dimensions ! Since it is like running away from the pain of detention ! So as you see there is no pretension So hope that there is no incomprehension ! Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. ==== Read the rest of my previous thoughts to understand better: More political philosophy about Elitism and Meritocracy.. The question is not do we have to have Elitism and Meritocracy, because we have to have Elitism and Meritocracy. But the question is: "what" kind of Elitism do we have to have and "what kind of meritocracy do we have to have ? Because as you are noticing that i said below: "You have to distinguish between this Elitism and that Elitism , i mean that there is not correct Elitism that hates inferiority of people and has the tendency to not get along with people, but i am not this Elitism" So you are noticing more what kind of Elitism and Meritocracy we have to be. So you have to be careful with the kind of Elitism and Meritocracy that we want to have. And you have to know how to navigate efficiently like a "pro", this is why you have to get into "realtime" and "dynamic" calculations to get better at efficiency, being correct professionalism needs from us to take responsability very "seriously", so you have to avoid to be lazy , because it is a work of everyday, look for example at how we are being synchronized much more efficiently etc. so you are noticing that our today lives are synchronized much more efficiently and our today lives needs to be much more "efficient" because today life needs from us to be much more smart and much more efficient than our past history, so as you are noticing that it is like our today is based on much more efficiency than past history and this doesn't contradict my following thoughts of my political philosophy, so read it again: More political philosophy about order.. I think you are understanding me more, but you are feeling more and more that i am also an Elitist, but you have to distinguish between this Elitism and that Elitism , i mean that there is not correct Elitism that hates inferiority of people and has the tendency to not get along with people, but i am not this Elitism, i am a proactive Elitism that talks to the people and that understand the living conditions of people, and that wants people to be "efficiency", and to be able to be efficiency you have to know how to be order, order is also following the rule of: People needs efficiency ! so order has to know how to follow rules of efficiency ! this is what i am talking about in my political philosophy: is how to be efficiency ! this is why you have also seen me talking in my political philosophy about what is morality and what is efficiency and is compassion and love inherent to efficiency (but notice that efficiency here is about humans that are efficient and that governs), so you have to understand me more, this is why you have to read my following thoughts of my political philosophy: About love and order.. As you are noticing i am "playing" with words when i am doing political philosophy, for example i am saying that i have defined morality by two abstractions that are: "Perfection at best" and with Efficiency and compassion and love that are inherent to efficiency. But you will ask the following question: Is it logical to say that compassion and love are inherent to efficiency ? You have to understand political philosophy, when i say love in political philosophy , love must "satisfy" "order", and order is primordial ! but what is order ? In political philosophy, order is a maximization at best of order ! so now you are understanding that there is no logical contradiction in my writing, this is why you are noticing that i am saying below the following: === Is compassion or love inherent to efficiency ? This is a very important question in political philosophy, so how can we answer it? i will start to answer it like this: Notice that in a society that we form (like in a country), we are also trying to "unite" so that to avoid desorder and its violence, so from this kind of "unification" we can say that a decent compassion and a decent love that is considered decent by morality and by the people is inherent to efficiency in politics so that to avoid desorder and its violence ! (read the rest of my thoughts below to understand more) == About democracy and corruption.. Corruption is Inducement to wrong by improper or unlawful means. Read the definition of corruption here to notice it: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/corruption So as i am explaining below that democracy depends on and is guided by morality that i defined with two abstraction that are: "Perfection at best" and with Efficiency and compassion and love that are inherent to efficiency (read below to understand), hence we can say that corruption is also "lack" of efficiency that doesn't follow the rule of morality that is: The people needs efficiency. So when i say below that: === How must we think democracy in political philosophy ? I think that we have to be more smart and notice that democracy is also smart, the big benefits of democracy that it is also like a morality that is a diversity that prioritize by giving weights to some important things and processes to be able to succeed, for example if i ask a question of how to be less corruption ? i think that democracy is an enhanced system that fights corruption more efficiently than dictatorship, i think this is understandable because to be able to "escape" a local maximum towards a global maximum(like in artificial intelligence) on efficiency of fighting corruption, we have to be able to vote for another political party that is more apt and more efficient at fighting corruption, this is why i think that democracy is better at fighting corruption, also i think that in democracy the governance must be a "competent" governance this is how we will enhance democracy to be the best. === Corruption above also means that it is lack of efficiency. Read the rest of my thoughts to understand more: More political philosophy about democracy.. Is democracy the best thing to do ? Here is what i said before, and my today answer is below: ======================================================= How must we think democracy in political philosophy ? I think that we have to be more smart and notice that democracy is also smart, the big benefits of democracy that it is also like a morality that is a diversity that prioritize by giving weights to some important things and processes to be able to succeed, for example if i ask a question of how to be less corruption ? i think that democracy is an enhanced system that fights corruption more efficiently than dictatorship, i think this is understandable because to be able to "escape" a local maximum towards a global maximum(like in artificial intelligence) on efficiency of fighting corruption, we have to be able to vote for another political party that is more apt and more efficient at fighting corruption, this is why i think that democracy is better at fighting corruption, also i think that in democracy the governance must be a "competent" governance this is how we will enhance democracy to be the best. And now about to technocracy or to not technocracy ? This is a really good subject of political philosophy, and answering it permits us to understand better our actual democracies, this is why i will continu to answer this question: I said before the following: Because you have to notice that technocracy needs utilitarianism and this kind of utilitarianism of technocracy needs "dictatorship", so technocracy is not democracy and technocracy is dictatorship, and this dictatorship can cause problems of more violence inside the society. Also this kind of utilitarianism of technocracy is something problematic because it has the tendency to give much more importance to the "performance" and to the "efficiency" sides to be able to be more "competitive", so this can easily become extremism that also cause problems of more violence inside the society. So technocracy is not correct thinking, because what we need is democracy that needs also a competent governance. But we have to understand better our world, and you have to notice on what is based many of the western democratic countries like France and such, i think that they understand that what we need is also the right dose of "humanism" that permits us to be a "civilization" that avoids savagery, this is why the utilitarianism of technocracy is not correct thinking, and i think we can also "view" this right dose of humanism as the way that USA system is run by the separation of powers to not "fall" into extremism and savagery ! so as you are noticing that democracy needs a competent governance and i think that democracy and a competent governance is the way to go. ======================================================================= So is democracy the best thing to do ? I think you have to understand that democracy "depends" on morality, it is like guided also by morality, and since as i said in my political philosophy below that morality is efficiency and the right compassion and love, so democracy also needs those requirements and is guided by those requirements, so democracy of course needs a "competent" governance since people needs efficiency, and democracy fights more efficiently corruption, and democracy needs to know how to avoid extremism that causes problems inside the system etc. Read the rest of my previous thoughts to understand better: About morality and political philosophy.. As you will notice i will do more political philosophy so that you understand better: If you remember my last thoughts of political philosophy about morality, it is the following: =========================================================================== I said in my proof before of: morality is perfection at best, the following: "Because morality exists because we have to avoid the bad And we have to avoid the bad by also trying to maximize at best the good And trying to maximize at best the good is also called: perfection at best So morality is pushed towards absolute perfection So that to be able to solve all our problems And be absolute happiness that is the goal But morality of today must at least be a decent morality To avoid desorder and violence inside the system" I have to be more precise: When i say: And we have to avoid the bad by also trying to maximize at best the good What is it that we call "good" in morality ? A good is like we have to correct or eliminate a defect or flaw , and being morality is correcting and eliminating the defects or flaws so that to attain reliability or flawlessness (you have not to read it out of context of my above proof), because in morality we have to maximize at best the good and minimizing at best the bad, that means also that we have to maximize at best reliability so that to attain flawlessness , and this is called perfection at best since from the following definition: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection perfection is also called freedom from fault or defect that we call: FLAWLESSNESS Also i said above that: "But morality of today must at least be a decent morality |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jul 18 09:11AM -0700 Hello.. I correct some of my thoughts, read again.. More thoughts of my political philosophy.. About white supremacism and neo-nazism.. I am more capable at political philosophy, and i think i understand the "defect" of white supremacism and neo-nazism, it is about "morality", and as i defined morality by two abstractions that are: Perfection at best and with Efficiency and the correct compassion and love that is inherent to efficiency (read more below to understand), so i think the defect of white supremacism and neo-nazism, is that they want to be white supremacism so they have the "tendency" like neo-nazism to be "radicalism" of "perfection" that is "too" violent with humans imperfections (but notice that we can not be confident with there violent behavior towards human imperfections), so they are like ideologies of radicalism that are evil over this earth, because they are not understanding the basis of our today civilization, our today civilization is also more patience and more tolerance and our today civilization is more positive because it believes that science and technology will soon be able to solve many of our problems because of the exponential progress and the law of accelerating returns that are so fast, so our today civilization is more positive and more confident, and read what i wrote before about being civilized: Now what is it to be civilized ? This is a smart question.. You have to understand deeply our kind of civilization to be able to answer this question, i think that our kind of civilization is wanting to "maximize" at best by "effort" the avoidance of savagery even if we are still savagery here and there, you have to be able able to understand how to prioritize to be able to succeed ! i think that our kind of civilization is giving a weight of great importance to the fact of avoiding savagery at best by effort, so this principle doesn't contradict the fact that even if we are still savagery here and there we have to maximize at best the avoidance of savagery by "effort", and also this principle has to be in accordance with the fact that we have to be the right "stability" to be able to call a society a society or a country a country, so this is why we are noticing that we are being a kind of "tolerance" and we are a social system and we are a health care system in our kind of civilization. So to be in accordance with the principle above you are understanding that we have to be efficient and much organized to be able to be this principle in action, this is why i am not in accordance with neo-nazism or white supremacism, because they are inferiority of morality that doesn't understand the requirements of our today "civilization", so white supremacists and neo-nazis have to adapt because they are too much violence. Read the rest of my thoughts to understand better: Yet about meritocracy and elitism.. I wrote previously the following: "More political philosophy about Elitism and Meritocracy.. The question is not do we have to have Elitism and Meritocracy, because we have to have Elitism and Meritocracy. But the question is: "what" kind of Elitism do we have to have and "what kind of meritocracy do we have to have ? Because as you are noticing that i said below: "You have to distinguish between this Elitism and that Elitism , i mean that there is not correct Elitism that hates inferiority of people and has the tendency to not get along with people, but i am not this Elitism"" And to be more "smart" look "carefully" at my following poem that i wrote previously that talks about the above problem: === Look at the more "individual" perfection It can become an imperfection Since more "awareness" of imperfections that is more individual perfection Can make us hate and discriminate our imperfections And since we are many of us made also of imperfections So this can make "us" more disorganized and less perfection And that's an "important" problem that needs an "attention" So this is why morality is calling for "actions" This is why laws are our security and a right prevention And this weakness must become a beautiful ascension So you have to see it better in many more dimensions ! Since it is like running away from the pain of detention ! So as you see there is no pretension So hope that there is no incomprehension ! Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. ==== Read the rest of my previous thoughts to understand better: More political philosophy about Elitism and Meritocracy.. The question is not do we have to have Elitism and Meritocracy, because we have to have Elitism and Meritocracy. But the question is: "what" kind of Elitism do we have to have and "what kind of meritocracy do we have to have ? Because as you are noticing that i said below: "You have to distinguish between this Elitism and that Elitism , i mean that there is not correct Elitism that hates inferiority of people and has the tendency to not get along with people, but i am not this Elitism" So you are noticing more what kind of Elitism and Meritocracy we have to be. So you have to be careful with the kind of Elitism and Meritocracy that we want to have. And you have to know how to navigate efficiently like a "pro", this is why you have to get into "realtime" and "dynamic" calculations to get better at efficiency, being correct professionalism needs from us to take responsability very "seriously", so you have to avoid to be lazy , because it is a work of everyday, look for example at how we are being synchronized much more efficiently etc. so you are noticing that our today lives are synchronized much more efficiently and our today lives needs to be much more "efficient" because today life needs from us to be much more smart and much more efficient than our past history, so as you are noticing that it is like our today is based on much more efficiency than past history and this doesn't contradict my following thoughts of my political philosophy, so read it again: More political philosophy about order.. I think you are understanding me more, but you are feeling more and more that i am also an Elitist, but you have to distinguish between this Elitism and that Elitism , i mean that there is not correct Elitism that hates inferiority of people and has the tendency to not get along with people, but i am not this Elitism, i am a proactive Elitism that talks to the people and that understand the living conditions of people, and that wants people to be "efficiency", and to be able to be efficiency you have to know how to be order, order is also following the rule of: People needs efficiency ! so order has to know how to follow rules of efficiency ! this is what i am talking about in my political philosophy: is how to be efficiency ! this is why you have also seen me talking in my political philosophy about what is morality and what is efficiency and is compassion and love inherent to efficiency (but notice that efficiency here is about humans that are efficient and that governs), so you have to understand me more, this is why you have to read my following thoughts of my political philosophy: About love and order.. As you are noticing i am "playing" with words when i am doing political philosophy, for example i am saying that i have defined morality by two abstractions that are: "Perfection at best" and with Efficiency and compassion and love that are inherent to efficiency. But you will ask the following question: Is it logical to say that compassion and love are inherent to efficiency ? You have to understand political philosophy, when i say love in political philosophy , love must "satisfy" "order", and order is primordial ! but what is order ? In political philosophy, order is a maximization at best of order ! so now you are understanding that there is no logical contradiction in my writing, this is why you are noticing that i am saying below the following: === Is compassion or love inherent to efficiency ? This is a very important question in political philosophy, so how can we answer it? i will start to answer it like this: Notice that in a society that we form (like in a country), we are also trying to "unite" so that to avoid desorder and its violence, so from this kind of "unification" we can say that a decent compassion and a decent love that is considered decent by morality and by the people is inherent to efficiency in politics so that to avoid desorder and its violence ! (read the rest of my thoughts below to understand more) == About democracy and corruption.. Corruption is Inducement to wrong by improper or unlawful means. Read the definition of corruption here to notice it: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/corruption So as i am explaining below that democracy depends on and is guided by morality that i defined with two abstraction that are: "Perfection at best" and with Efficiency and compassion and love that are inherent to efficiency (read below to understand), hence we can say that corruption is also "lack" of efficiency that doesn't follow the rule of morality that is: The people needs efficiency. So when i say below that: === How must we think democracy in political philosophy ? I think that we have to be more smart and notice that democracy is also smart, the big benefits of democracy that it is also like a morality that is a diversity that prioritize by giving weights to some important things and processes to be able to succeed, for example if i ask a question of how to be less corruption ? i think that democracy is an enhanced system that fights corruption more efficiently than dictatorship, i think this is understandable because to be able to "escape" a local maximum towards a global maximum(like in artificial intelligence) on efficiency of fighting corruption, we have to be able to vote for another political party that is more apt and more efficient at fighting corruption, this is why i think that democracy is better at fighting corruption, also i think that in democracy the governance must be a "competent" governance this is how we will enhance democracy to be the best. === Corruption above also means that it is lack of efficiency. Read the rest of my thoughts to understand more: More political philosophy about democracy.. Is democracy the best thing to do ? Here is what i said before, and my today answer is below: ======================================================= How must we think democracy in political philosophy ? I think that we have to be more smart and notice that democracy is also smart, the big benefits of democracy that it is also like a morality that is a diversity that prioritize by giving weights to some important things and processes to be able to succeed, for example if i ask a question of how to be less corruption ? i think that democracy is an enhanced system that fights corruption more efficiently than dictatorship, i think this is understandable because to be able to "escape" a local maximum towards a global maximum(like in artificial intelligence) on efficiency of fighting corruption, we have to be able to vote for another political party that is more apt and more efficient at fighting corruption, this is why i think that democracy is better at fighting corruption, also i think that in democracy the governance must be a "competent" governance this is how we will enhance democracy to be the best. And now about to technocracy or to not technocracy ? This is a really good subject of political philosophy, and answering it permits us to understand better our actual democracies, this is why i will continu to answer this question: I said before the following: Because you have to notice that technocracy needs utilitarianism and this kind of utilitarianism of technocracy needs "dictatorship", so technocracy is not democracy and technocracy is dictatorship, and this dictatorship can cause problems of more violence inside the society. Also this kind of utilitarianism of technocracy is something problematic because it has the tendency to give much more importance to the "performance" and to the "efficiency" sides to be able to be more "competitive", so this can easily become extremism that also cause problems of more violence inside the society. So technocracy is not correct thinking, because what we need is democracy that needs also a competent governance. But we have to understand better our world, and you have to notice on what is based many of the western democratic countries like France and such, i think that they understand that what we need is also the right dose of "humanism" that permits us to be a "civilization" that avoids savagery, this is why the utilitarianism of technocracy is not correct thinking, and i think we can also "view" this right dose of humanism as the way that USA system is run by the separation of powers to not "fall" into extremism and savagery ! so as you are noticing that democracy needs a competent governance and i think that democracy and a competent governance is the way to go. ======================================================================= So is democracy the best thing to do ? I think you have to understand that democracy "depends" on morality, it is like guided also by morality, and since as i said in my political philosophy below that morality is efficiency and the right compassion and love, so democracy also needs those requirements and is guided by those requirements, so democracy of course needs a "competent" governance since people needs efficiency, and democracy fights more efficiently corruption, and democracy needs to know how to avoid extremism that causes problems inside the system etc. Read the rest of my previous thoughts to understand better: About morality and political philosophy.. As you will notice i will do more political philosophy so that you understand better: If you remember my last thoughts of political philosophy about morality, it is the following: =========================================================================== I said in my proof before of: morality is perfection at best, the following: "Because morality exists because we have to avoid the bad And we have to avoid the bad by also trying to maximize at best the good And trying to maximize at best the good is also called: perfection at best So morality is pushed towards absolute perfection So that to be able to solve all our problems And be absolute happiness that is the goal But morality of today must at least be a decent morality To avoid desorder and violence inside the system" I have to be more precise: When i say: And we have to avoid the bad by also trying to maximize at best the good What is it that we call "good" in morality ? A good is like we have to correct or eliminate a defect or flaw , and being morality is correcting and eliminating the defects or flaws so that to attain reliability or flawlessness (you have not to read it out of context of my above proof), because in morality we have to maximize at best the good and minimizing at best the bad, that means also that we have to maximize at best reliability so that to attain flawlessness , and this is called perfection at best since from the following definition: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection perfection is also called freedom from fault or defect that we call: FLAWLESSNESS Also i said above that: "But morality of today must at least be a decent morality To avoid desorder and violence |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment