- More political philosophy about civilization.. - 1 Update
- More about capitalism and about National Vanguard.. - 1 Update
- More about political philosophy.. - 1 Update
| aminer68@gmail.com: Aug 19 02:41AM -0700 Hello.. More political philosophy about civilization.. So now i will do more political philosophy about capitalism and governance, i am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, now you will hear that Marxism is scientific or communism is scientific, but i don't think they are scientific, since as you are noticing i am using my fluid intelligence so that to logically prove, so first you are noticing that we have to be Meritocracy, but Meritocracy has to define what is the right "value", is the right value only a useful utility ? so now you are understanding that if we define it by simply saying that it is a useful utility to people, so now we are not respecting the principles of Morality, since we have to make our civilization go forward towards more and more perfection, so this going forward towards more and more perfection sets the usefulness of the utility , so then it sets the value, so then you are noticing that Morality is like going forward towards more and more perfection and this process enhance the "quality" and the quality of the utility, so then it sets the value and it sets the usefulness of the utility, and i think this is part of the essence of a civilization. So read my thoughts of my political philosophy about morality here to notice it: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4 But now you will notice that there is something happening, it is that we have to know how to "tune" diversity and to tune morality so that to not degenerate into a too violent system, and you will notice it by my following thoughts: More political philosophy about white supremacism and neo-nazism.. Read the following new article from a white supremacist website from USA called national vanguard: We Know The True American Type And We Know The Liberal https://nationalvanguard.org/2020/08/we-know-the-true-american-type-and-we-know-the-liberal/ So i am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, so i have to be frank, so look at the following writing of the above article: "Today it teaches the doctrine of liberalism with its pacifism, its love for the inferior and misbegotten, its internationalism which makes a virtue out of treason, its hatred of all who possess strong national feelings, its toothless desire for racial equality, and its tolerance of everything and everyone, particularly the alien and the unfit." So as you are noticing that the above article is making a logical inconsistency, since take for example "beauty", we can say by the same logic as the above article that since beauty is much less important than technical efficiency, so we have to pay beauty much less money than technical efficiency, but if you say so you are questioning the very basic fondations of what we call a civilization, since our kind of civilization comes with a kind of tolerance that permits it , this is part of the backbone of our civilization, it is also this kind of tolerance that permits us to be the right tolerance and compassion towards the unfit and towards the alien, and if you change this, i think this will make our societies much more and too violent societies, so you have to understand it so that to understand the backbone of our civilization. Second logical inconsistency of the above article, it is that those white supremacists are giving too much importance to genetics, neglecting at same time the power of culture and learning and awareness that permit or can permit other ethnic groups such as arabs and south americans and indians to become much better humans. More precision about capitalism and about National Vanguard.. I will be more rigorous, so read again: I have just read the following article from a white supremacist website called National Vanguard: Why Capitalism Fails https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/07/why-capitalism-fails/ And it is saying the following about why capitalism fails: "Capitalism permits inheritance, the command transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner. And therein is the flaw: inherited wealth isn't earned by its owner, yet it leads to a class segregation of men that has nothing to do with how much wealth they have earned; i.e., nothing to do with how much or how well or how significantly they have worked." I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, and i will answer with my fluid intelligence: I think the above article is not taking into account the risk factor and and the smartness factor, so there have to be mechanisms, that are like engines, that "encourage" to or/and "make" a part of the people work by taking risks or great risks and by doing there best (so that to become rich) or/and that "encourage" to or/and "make" the smartest to give there best with there smartness (so that to become rich), so i think capitalism has those mechanisms in form of rewards by allowing to become "rich" and in form of rewards by allowing inheritance, the command transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner: Since it "encourages" to or/and "makes" a part of the people work by taking risks and by doing there best (so that to become rich) or/and it encourages to or/and makes the smartest give there best with there smartness (so that to become rich). And notice that i am also defining taking a "risk" as working "hard". And the above article is saying the following: "Capitalism constantly looks for ways to reduce labor costs. Automation made human labor less necessary than it had been when capitalism first appeared. When automation did appear, people who had the talent, the skills, and the motivation to make contributions began to find no jobs, or to become uncompetitive with mass-production if they tried to employ themselves." I think it is not true, because read the following: https://singularityhub.com/2019/01/01/ai-will-create-millions-more-jobs-than-it-will-destroy-heres-how/ And read the following: Here is the advantages and disadvantages of automation: Following are some of the advantages of automation: 1. Automation is the key to the shorter workweek. Automation will allow the average number of working hours per week to continue to decline, thereby allowing greater leisure hours and a higher quality life. 2. Automation brings safer working conditions for the worker. Since there is less direct physical participation by the worker in the production process, there is less chance of personal injury to the worker. 3. Automated production results in lower prices and better products. It has been estimated that the cost to machine one unit of product by conventional general-purpose machine tools requiring human operators may be 100 times the cost of manufacturing the same unit using automated mass-production techniques. The electronics industry offers many examples of improvements in manufacturing technology that have significantly reduced costs while increasing product value (e.g., colour TV sets, stereo equipment, calculators, and computers). 4. The growth of the automation industry will itself provide employment opportunities. This has been especially true in the computer industry, as the companies in this industry have grown (IBM, Digital Equipment Corp., Honeywell, etc.), new jobs have been created. These new jobs include not only workers directly employed by these companies, but also computer programmers, systems engineers, and other needed to use and operate the computers. 5. Automation is the only means of increasing standard of living. Only through productivity increases brought about by new automated methods of production, it is possible to advance standard of living. Granting wage increases without a commensurate increase in productivity will results in inflation. To afford a better society, it is a must to increase productivity. Following are some of the disadvantages of automation: 1. Automation will result in the subjugation of the human being by a machine. Automation tends to transfer the skill required to perform work from human operators to machines. In so doing, it reduces the need for skilled labour. The manual work left by automation requires lower skill levels and tends to involve rather menial tasks (e.g., loading and unloading workpart, changing tools, removing chips, etc.). In this sense, automation tends to downgrade factory work. 2. There will be a reduction in the labour force, with resulting unemployment. It is logical to argue that the immediate effect of automation will be to reduce the need for human labour, thus displacing workers. 3. Automation will reduce purchasing power. As machines replace workers and these workers join the unemployment ranks, they will not receive the wages necessary to buy the products brought by automation. Markets will become saturated with products that people cannot afford to purchase. Inventories will grow. Production will stop. Unemployment will reach epidemic proportions and the result will be a massive economic depression. And to know more about economy and capitalism, please read my following thoughts: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/wlJu5j1xhPk And read more of my thoughts of my political philosophy here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/8j-rboLzi38 More political philosophy about Meritocracy.. Read the following article about Meritocracy from the Atlantic: https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/12/meritocracy/418074/ So as you notice it says: "The pursuit of meritocracy is more difficult than it appears," So i think in Meritocracy we can not be strict equality, so we have to get into the details and into the calculations to tune it correctly and efficiently so that to make Meritocracy efficient and at the same time less problematic, but we have to notice that Meritocracy is still important. Read my following previous thoughts of my political philosophy: More political philosophy about responsability.. I have just read the following article about Putin: https://www.newsweek.com/putin-says-communism-comes-bible-compares-lenin-saint-781328 And notice that it says the following: "But Putin argues that like Christianity, communism preaches "freedom, brotherhood, equality." He called the Moral Code of the Builder of Communism, a pamphlet of guiding principles for all party members, a "primitive excerpt from the Bible."" I agree that the communism was about "freedom, brotherhood, equality.", but we have to be pragmatic, so we have to be smart and play it smartly since we have to also know how to address the problem of hate, so there must be "responsability", since if we simply call people to freedom and brotherhood and equality, it is not pragmatic, since we have to call them first to responsability that permits to bring such as those qualities, and we have also to be pragmatic since we can not be strict equality(since it is also not Meritocracy, so it is not efficient), but we can be solidarity and collaboration, so now you are understanding why i am talking as i am talking about nationalism and about hate in my thoughts of my political philosophy(read more about hate in my thoughts below), so here is my thoughts of my political philosophy about nationalism: More political philosophy about globalization and nationalism.. I am a white arab and i think i am more smart, so today i will talk about a very important subject about Globalization and nationalism, so i will invite you to look at the following video of Marine Le Pen of the far-right political party in France: Marine Le Pen explains why nationalism is important https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNpI9wKnE8Q As you notice that Marine Le Pen is saying in french that the fight today is between nationalism and globalization, since Marine Le Pen says that globalization is a treat to national identity and is a treat to national sovereignty, but i think that Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly globalization, since i think that nationalism is too much competition and communism and socialism is too much collaboration , so i think the best way is to seek like a balance between collaboration and competition and when we look at globalization you will notice that we are collaborating with others by for example sharing Open Source softwares or Free softwares or PhD papers or knowledge on internet etc, and we are also competition by not collaborating with others, and with this new kind of model we are noticing that we are not just one identity like being french, but we are becoming multiple identities because this kind of new model is making a part of us that collaborate "universal", and this is why i think that Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly this new kind of model of like seeking a balance between competition and collaboration , and i think that this new model is better because it is more efficient , because i think this partly collaboration of this new model is good and more efficient for creativity, innovation, adaptability and speed of progress, i also think in capitalism the price of internet has gotten cheap and the price of computers has gotten cheap, so we are able today to access internet with a low price and benefit from "collaboration" and also sharing in internet, for example look at me, i have invented many scalable algorithms and i have decided to share some of them with the others, and it is of course collaboration , so look for example at my following inventions of scalable algorithms that i have shared with others, here they are: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-mlock https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock-that-works-accross-processes-and-threads https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.programming.threads/VaOo1WVACgs https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well Also i have decided to not share others of my scalable algorithms and it is competition, so i am seeking like a balance between collaboration and competition. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| aminer68@gmail.com: Aug 18 03:28PM -0700 Hello, More about capitalism and about National Vanguard.. I have just read the following article from a white supremacist website called National Vanguard: Why Capitalism Fails https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/07/why-capitalism-fails/ And it is saying the following about why capitalism fails: "Capitalism permits inheritance, the command transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner. And therein is the flaw: inherited wealth isn't earned by its owner, yet it leads to a class segregation of men that has nothing to do with how much wealth they have earned; i.e., nothing to do with how much or how well or how significantly they have worked." I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, and i will answer with my fluid intelligence: I think the above article is not taking into account the risk factor and and the smartness factor, so there have to be mechanisms, that are like engines, that "encourage" to or/and "make" a part of the people work by taking risks or great risks and by doing there best (so that to become rich) or/and that encourage the smartest to give there best with there smartness (so that to become rich), so i think capitalism has those mechanisms in form of rewards by allowing to become "rich" and in form of rewards by allowing inheritance, the command transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner: Since it "encourages" to or/and "makes" a part of the people work by taking risks and by doing there best (so that to become rich) or/and it encourages the smartest to give there best with there smartness (so that to become rich) . And the above article is saying the following: "Capitalism constantly looks for ways to reduce labor costs. Automation made human labor less necessary than it had been when capitalism first appeared. When automation did appear, people who had the talent, the skills, and the motivation to make contributions began to find no jobs, or to become uncompetitive with mass-production if they tried to employ themselves." I think it is not true, because read the following: https://singularityhub.com/2019/01/01/ai-will-create-millions-more-jobs-than-it-will-destroy-heres-how/ And read the following: Here is the advantages and disadvantages of automation: Following are some of the advantages of automation: 1. Automation is the key to the shorter workweek. Automation will allow the average number of working hours per week to continue to decline, thereby allowing greater leisure hours and a higher quality life. 2. Automation brings safer working conditions for the worker. Since there is less direct physical participation by the worker in the production process, there is less chance of personal injury to the worker. 3. Automated production results in lower prices and better products. It has been estimated that the cost to machine one unit of product by conventional general-purpose machine tools requiring human operators may be 100 times the cost of manufacturing the same unit using automated mass-production techniques. The electronics industry offers many examples of improvements in manufacturing technology that have significantly reduced costs while increasing product value (e.g., colour TV sets, stereo equipment, calculators, and computers). 4. The growth of the automation industry will itself provide employment opportunities. This has been especially true in the computer industry, as the companies in this industry have grown (IBM, Digital Equipment Corp., Honeywell, etc.), new jobs have been created. These new jobs include not only workers directly employed by these companies, but also computer programmers, systems engineers, and other needed to use and operate the computers. 5. Automation is the only means of increasing standard of living. Only through productivity increases brought about by new automated methods of production, it is possible to advance standard of living. Granting wage increases without a commensurate increase in productivity will results in inflation. To afford a better society, it is a must to increase productivity. Following are some of the disadvantages of automation: 1. Automation will result in the subjugation of the human being by a machine. Automation tends to transfer the skill required to perform work from human operators to machines. In so doing, it reduces the need for skilled labour. The manual work left by automation requires lower skill levels and tends to involve rather menial tasks (e.g., loading and unloading workpart, changing tools, removing chips, etc.). In this sense, automation tends to downgrade factory work. 2. There will be a reduction in the labour force, with resulting unemployment. It is logical to argue that the immediate effect of automation will be to reduce the need for human labour, thus displacing workers. 3. Automation will reduce purchasing power. As machines replace workers and these workers join the unemployment ranks, they will not receive the wages necessary to buy the products brought by automation. Markets will become saturated with products that people cannot afford to purchase. Inventories will grow. Production will stop. Unemployment will reach epidemic proportions and the result will be a massive economic depression. And to know more about economy and capitalism, please read my following thoughts: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/wlJu5j1xhPk And read more of my thoughts of my political philosophy here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/8j-rboLzi38 Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| aminer68@gmail.com: Aug 18 12:00PM -0700 Hello.. You have to understand political philosophy, i think political philosophy must be "constructive", but what do i mean by constructive ? you will quickly notice that humans have human imperfections, but when you look at those human imperfection you can start to hate humans and hate our humanity, but this is not the good political philosophy, because you have to distinguish between two things: First, you can look at those human imperfections and hate humans and hate our humanity and then degenerate towards a much more violent system, second, you can look at those human imperfections and say that we have to transcend those human imperfections by being efficiently educated and by being efficiently organized globally and locally and by being efficiently trained and by being efficiently aware and conscious, so what will you choose ? so i think you are quickly understanding that Democracy has to be "proactive" by efficiently educating and by efficiently organizing globally and locally and by efficiently training and by efficiently making aware and conscious so that Democracy works correctly and so that we can transcend our human imperfections, so then i think that you are quickly noticing that it is the way that i am choosing so that to transcend our human imperfections, this is why you have noticed that i said previously the following: --- I am noticing that people here are quick at hating, notice that the white supremacist of soc.culture.china newsgroup called Byker is hating Chinese people and is hating other people around the world etc. and notice that people are quick at hating people because of there human imperfections, but i think that this is not wise because you can easily hate people and hate our world and hate our humanity, but when you are smart you will notice that you have not to fall into this trap of hating and hating people and hating our world and hating our humanity, because the best way is to be "constructive" and make people educated and aware and efficient so that we reduce much more there imperfections and so that we accept them and so that we don't fall into the trap of hating people and hating our world and hating our humanity. This is why i am talking as i am talking political philosophy. --- About optimization and about the saying of Bertrand Arthur William Russell.. Bertrand Arthur William Russell said: "The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt." Here is Bertrand Arthur William Russell: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand_Russell I think that this saying of Bertrand Arthur William Russell is not so smart, i am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, so here is my saying (that i think is better than the one of Bertrand Arthur William Russel): I think that it is like the Population based algorithm such as PSO that guarantees the optimal convergence, i mean that so that to be an efficient optimization, you need both an efficient exploration(global optimization) and an efficient exploitation(local optimization) so that to converge to a global optimum, so now you are understanding that you have to be the right "patience"(not being full of doubt like said Bertrand Arthur William Russell) before you converge to the global optimum(that can be the truth etc.). More of my thoughts on Optimization and Productivity and Quality.. You have to know how to optimize by elimination of waste, like in Just-in-time manufacturing, and you have to know about total quality management (TQM), because one of the most important thing of total quality management (TQM) is not only to correct an apparent problem or defect but it is also to know what is the "cause" or "root" of the problem or defect, so now you are noticing that it needs local and global optimization, so i give you an example, i just said before the following, read in the following web link: https://community.idera.com/developer-tools/general-development/f/getit-and-third-party/73133/about-productivity So notice that the PhD scientist in the web link above has neglected global optimization, so he has acted with his smartness more like an incorrect local optimization of the Simulated annealing algorithm or Hill Climbing algorithm, so he has not acted by being correct local and global optimization like of a Population based algorithm such as PSO, this is i think his deficiency, so he has not been able to see the solution to the problem, so as you are noticing that i am in the above web link more correctly optimizing with my smartness locally and globally and this has allowed me to find the solution(read in the above web link above to notice it), and this is really important and it is related to global and local optimization of Population based algorithms such as PSO, so read my following thoughts to know more: More smartness about what is artificial intelligence.. I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, and when you are smart you will easily understand artificial intelligence, this is why i am finding artificial intelligence easy to learn, i think to be able to understand artificial intelligence you have to understand reasoning with energy minimization, like with PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), but you have to be smart since the Population based algorithm has to guarantee the optimal convergence, and this is why i am learning you how to do it(read below), i think that GA(genetic algorithm) is good for teaching it, but GA(genetic algorithm) doesn't guarantee the optimal convergence, and after learning how to do reasoning with energy minimization in artificial intelligence, you have to understand what is transfer learning in artificial intelligence with PathNet or such, this transfer learning permits to train faster and require less labeled data, also PathNet is much more powerful since also it is higher level abstraction in artificial intelligence.. Read about it here: https://mattturck.com/frontierai/ And read about PathNet here: https://medium.com/@thoszymkowiak/deepmind-just-published-a-mind-blowing-paper-pathnet-f72b1ed38d46 I think one of the most important part in artificial intelligence is reasoning with energy minimization, it is the one that i am working on right now, see the following video to understand more about it: Yann LeCun: Can Neural Networks Reason? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAfwNEY826I&t=250s I think that since i have just understood much more artificial intelligence, i will soon show you my next Open source software project that implement a powerful Parallel Linear programming solver and a powerful Parallel Mixed-integer programming solver with Artificial intelligence using PSO, and i will write an article that explains much more artificial intelligence and that explains what is smartness and what is consciousness and self-awareness.. Read my previous thoughts to understand: I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms.. And in only one day i have just learned "much" more artificial intelligence, i have read the following article about Particle Swarm Optimization and i have understood it: Artificial Intelligence - Particle Swarm Optimization https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/msdn-magazine/2011/august/artificial-intelligence-particle-swarm-optimization But i have just noticed that the above implementation doesn't guarantee the optimal convergence. So here is how to guarantee the optimal convergence in PSO: Clerc and Kennedy in (Trelea 2003) propose a constriction coefficient parameter selection guidelines in order to guarantee the optimal convergence, here is how to do it with PSO: v (t+1) = k*[(v(t) + (c1 * r1 * (p(t) – x(t)) + (c2 * r2 * (g(t) – x(t))] x(t+1) = x(t) + v(t+1) constriction coefficient parameter is: k = 2/abs(2-phi-sqrt(phi^2-(4*phi))) k:=2/abs((2-4.1)-(0.640)) = 0.729 phi = c1 + c2 To guarantee the optimal convergence use: c1 = c2 = 2.05 phi = 4.1 => k equal to 0.729 w=0.7298 Population size = 60; Also i have noticed that GA(genetic algorithm) doesn't guarantee the optimal convergence, and SA(Simulated annealing) and Hill Climbing are much less powerful since they perform only exploitation. In general, any metaheuristic should perform two main searching capabilities (Exploration and Exploitation). Population based algorithms ( or many solutions ) such as GA, PSO, ACO, or ABC, performs both Exploration and Exploitation, while Single-Based Algorithm such as SA(Simulated annealing), Hill Climbing, performs the exploitation only. In this case, more exploitation and less exploration increases the chances for trapping in local optima. Because the algorithm does not have the ability to search in another position far from the current best solution ( which is Exploration). Simulated annealing starts in one valley and typically ends in the lowest point of the same valley. Whereas swarms start in many different places of the mountain range and are searching for the lowest point in many valleys simultaneously. And in my next Open source software project i will implement a powerful Parallel Linear programming solver and a powerful Parallel Mixed-integer programming solver with Artificial intelligence using PSO. And my above thoughts are related to my following thoughts of my political philosophy, here they are: I think there is a logical analogy to make about human life, that it looks like the optimization in form of exploration and exploitation of the genetic algorithm, but i think that the today optimization of human life is much more enhanced than simply a genetic algorithm, because the weakness of a genetic algorithm is that it is not the smartness in action of humans, so i think that artificial intelligence of a genetic algorithm is much much more inferior than smartness of humans, this is why we have to be optimistic about the exponential progress of our humanity that will quickly enhance greatly the quality of human life, so then we have to be the right patience and at the same time optimize efficiently locally and globally, so i invite you to read my previous thoughts to understand what i mean: More political philosophy about the genetic algorithm.. I think that you are feeling that political philosophy is so interesting and so important, so can we ask a question: Does human life evolves just like exploration and exploitation of a genetic algorithm ? Is it just like local optimization and global optimization ? this is a very good philosophical question ! so you can look at it from this level of abstraction and say that it is still savagery , but i think it needs more smartness , since we have to take into account the exponential progress (that depends on the global optimization) that will soon and quickly enhance much more the "quality" of human life so that we will soon be much more satisfied, so i am positive about this exponential progress of our humanity, this is why i say that you have to stay positive, read about the exponential progress of our humanity in my writing below. Read my previous thoughts to understand: More political philosophy about the following beautiful indian song.. I have just spoken about the most important rule of political philosophy(read below about it), and notice that in the following video of a beautiful indian song that the singers are optimizing locally and optimizing globally with the beautiful song by using there beauty to enhance our civilization, it is like genetic algorithm, look carefully at them here in this beautiful indian song on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWPsjhBaRb0 More political philosophy about the most important rule.. Can i abstract more and find with my fluid intelligence the most important rule in political philosophy ? I think you have to be smart and notice that the genetic algorithm is based on exploration and exploitation, i mean it has to optimize locally and it has to optimize globally, and since it has to optimize globally so it needs to diversify its efficiency to become much more efficient, and i think that this is the most important rule in political philosophy, since if in political philosophy you want to remain just nationalism, it is not a good optimization because it neglects global optimization, and this is why i am also talking about it below in terms of optimization, this is the same for "tolerance" , you can have the tendency to be intolerant towards the weakest members of the society or towards the unfit or towards the aliens or towards the immigrants, but it is idiotic since you have to know how this diversity do optimize more efficiently the system, this is why i am talking as i am talking in my political philosophy, and i think that you are now able to see one of the most important rule that is related to global optimization, since our world today has to not only to optimize locally but it must optimize globally, so we have not to neglect the global optimization, this is the most important rule in political philosophy. Read my previous thoughts of my political philosophy to understand more: More political philosophy about the good spirit.. You are feeling from my thoughts that political philosophy is so important, so what is the good spirit ? you are noticing from my below thoughts about white supremacism and neo-nazism that life must be "tuned" and "calculated", but you will notice that there is Macro calculations like in Macroeconomics and there is Micro calculations like in Microeconomics, and i think that political philosophy is Macro calculations, since political philosophy does reason at a much higher level of abstraction , since i think that political philosophy does mostly do calculations with meanings of higher level abstractions at a higher level of abstraction, and political philosophy does extract the "rules" or "laws" that permits us to be efficient as a society or as a humanity, for example you will notice in my below thoughts that i am showing what kind of tolerance is inherent to or part of the backbone of our today civilization, so as you are noticing it is like a "pattern" that i am extracting with my fluid intelligence by using abstract reasoning, and from it i can build a much bigger and coherent intellectual structure, so you are noticing it is also efficiency so that we don't fall into a too violent society or humanity, and you will notice it also in my below thoughts of my political philosophy about hate, since i am showing that there must be prior responsability and not idiotic hate so that we much more enhance our living conditions, and you are noticing too that Meritocracy has to be tuned too so that to be efficient and at the same time be less problematic(read below to notice it), and you are noticing from my thoughts of my political philosophy below about nationalism that we have to seek like a balance between collaboration and competition and i am explaining this new model and i am giving some examples so that you understand it correctly, so you are noticing that political philosophy also brings the good spirit. So i invite you to read all my following previous thoughts to understand: More political philosophy about white supremacism and neo-nazism.. Read the following new article from a white supremacist website from USA called national vanguard: We Know The True American Type And We Know The Liberal https://nationalvanguard.org/2020/08/we-know-the-true-american-type-and-we-know-the-liberal/ So i am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, so i have to be frank, so look at the following writing of the above article: |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment