| aminer68@gmail.com: Aug 30 04:13PM -0700 Hello, More political philosophy about efficiency.. Today i will speak about the most important subject and it is: How to be efficient ? I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, so i will answer this question as follows: You have to be both good productivity and good quality. Now my answer is a high level abstraction, so i will go into the lower layers of abstraction: So, to be efficient productivity, here is what you have to do: Read my following smart thoughts to understand: https://community.idera.com/developer-tools/general-development/f/getit-and-third-party/73133/about-productivity So as you are noticing i am saying: "Since we have that Productivity = Output/Input But better human training and/or better tools and/or better human smartness and/or better human capacity can make the Parallel productivity part much bigger than the Serial productivity part, so productivity can scale much more (and it is like Gustafson's Law)." So as you are noticing that my answer about productivity is smart. And now how to be good in quality? You have to be smart(and use you fluid intelligence efficiently) and efficiently learn how to learn and efficiently learn. So as you are noticing that the constant factors in the human population are genetical, so the very important thing to notice is that to be good in quality you have to have a good education and an awareness, and of course you have, like in genetic algorithms, to know how to efficiently optimize locally(by exploitation) and globally(by exploration and diversification) so that to be optimal optimization. And of course there is individual efficiency and the group efficiency, but you have to be smart and notice that you have to know about the exponential progress and how to exponentially progress, so read my following thoughts to understand about it: Here is the 6 D's of Exponential Growth: Digitalization: Once something goes from physical to digital, it gains the ability to grow exponentially. Deception: Initial exponential growth is such small increases (.01 to .02) that it goes largely unnoticed. Disruption: Either a new market is created, or an old one is overturned. You either disrupt yourself, or you are disrupted. Demonetization: The major assets in the industry will become free. Free music, free reading, free communication. Dematerialization: Removal of the original product entirely, lumping alarm clocks, cameras, notebooks, and phones into one smartphone. Democratization: The costs drop so low that the technology becomes available to everyone. Read more here: The 6 Ds of Tech Disruption: A Guide to the Digital Economy https://singularityhub.com/2016/11/22/the-6-ds-of-tech-disruption-a-guide-to-the-digital-economy/?fbclid=IwAR1Jx4VJYvIce-BJXeVcajBYjwdKvvP_2y4WOd-2DEtGvXnOye0yzkQVdQU&utm_content=bufferb9891&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook-hub&utm_campaign=buffer Also capitalism switches from linear to exponential growth Read more here: http://parisinnovationreview.com/articles-en/capitalism-switches-from-linear-to-exponential-growth And read the following: Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ But as you have just noticed that it is also related to my following thoughts: The future of innovation is in software I keep reading about how the future will be shaped by new cheaper fuel or amazing new medications. I believe that we are misreading the trends. Yes, we will have better medications and cheaper fuel in the future. However, I believe we are clearly in the mist of an information revolution. The future will be shaped by software, defined broadly. Specifically, I believe that: Tele-work, tele-play, tele-learning will soon represent 80% of our lives. There is much more room for innovation in software than in hardware. There are few ways to build a house, but many more ways to build a virtual house. Read more here: https://lemire.me/blog/2008/10/27/the-future-of-innovation-is-in-software/ And this related to my following thoughts: Dematerialising the future: what role can technology and consumers play? I have just posted before about Dematerialization Through Services, read it here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/soc.culture.usa/rVZUcghUe5E The above makes it clear that the evidence indicates that 'dematerialization through services' is not a valid policy for reducing carbon emissions. But Dematerialising is still important, read the following to notice it: Dematerialising the future: what role can technology and consumers play? https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/dematerialising-future-technology-consumers Also read my following thoughts to notice: About capitalism and the positive correlation between economic growth and environmental performance.. As an economy expands, resource usage becomes increasingly efficient and economies tend to move away from ecologically harmful behavior, while raising the standard of living of its participants. In fact, the 2018 Yale Environmental Performance Index shows a clear positive correlation between economic growth and environmental performance, read about it here: https://epi.envirocenter.yale.edu/2018/report/category/hlt So i think that we are on the right path, so as you are noticing that we have to dematerialize much more so that to avoid Environmental problems, but how will look like our near future that will be much more dematerialized ? look here in the following video to notice that one of our fellow techlead and software developer is doing it by much more dematerializing his life and he is happy by doing it: My minimalist apartment (as a millionaire) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUeqHhbQWFc More political philosophy about the Moroccan couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui.. I am a white arab from Morocco that is living in Canada since year 1989 and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, and now i will do more political philosophy about the Moroccan couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui, here it is: https://tasteofmaroc.com/moroccan-couscous-with-seven-vegetables/ So as you are noticing you have to be smart, so when you look at this beautiful Moroccan couscous, there is different levels of abstraction, since you can simply look at it and remember and say that it is a beautiful Moroccan couscous, or you can be more smart and look at it from a different perspective and from a different level of abstraction and say that this beautiful Moroccan couscous requires Spices that give it the good taste, and when you are smart you will immediately make a logical analogy with political philosophy by saying that those Spices of this beautiful Moroccan couscous make, from the imperfection of a not so good taste, a perfection of a good taste, so you will say that it is the same for humans, since arabs and indians and south americans and such other ethnical groups can also use Spices in a form of good education and awareness so that to reduce by much there imperfections that give them a not so good taste , so that to be accepted by others, and now you are understanding that it is a good philosophy that calls for proactivity that wants people to have a good education and an awareness, and this is related to my following thoughts on hate, so read them carefully: You have to understand political philosophy, i think political philosophy must be "constructive", but what do i mean by constructive ? you will quickly notice that humans have human imperfections, but when you look at those human imperfection you can start to hate humans and hate our humanity, but this is not the good political philosophy, because you have to distinguish between two things: First, you can look at those human imperfections and hate humans and hate our humanity and then degenerate towards a much more violent system, second, you can look at those human imperfections and say that we have to transcend those human imperfections by being efficiently educated and by being efficiently organized globally and locally and by being efficiently trained and by being efficiently aware and conscious, so what will you choose ? so i think you are quickly understanding that Democracy has to be "proactive" by efficiently educating and by efficiently organizing globally and locally and by efficiently training and by efficiently making aware and conscious so that Democracy works correctly and so that we can transcend our human imperfections, so then i think that you are quickly noticing that it is the way that i am choosing so that to transcend our human imperfections, this is why you have noticed that i said previously the following: --- I am noticing that people here are quick at hating, notice that the white supremacist of soc.culture.china newsgroup called Byker is hating Chinese people and is hating other people around the world etc. and notice that people are quick at hating people because of there human imperfections, but i think that this is not wise because you can easily hate people and hate our world and hate our humanity, but when you are smart you will notice that you have not to fall into this trap of hating and hating people and hating our world and hating our humanity, because the best way is to be "constructive" and make people educated and aware and efficient so that we reduce much more there imperfections and so that we accept them and so that we don't fall into the trap of hating people and hating our world and hating our humanity. This is why i am talking as i am talking political philosophy. --- More political philosophy about the Moroccan couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui, here it is: https://tasteofmaroc.com/moroccan-couscous-with-seven-vegetables/ First i said the following about fluid intelligence: --- Here is my definition of "pattern", since i am using it below in my thoughts of my political philosophy: A pattern is a discernible coherent system based on the intended interrelationship of component parts. So you are understanding that fluid intelligence from genetics has to discern this coherent system and also extract the rule, it is also how we are extracting a theorem in mathematics, it is how works fluid intelligence from genetics. --- So as you are noticing i am using my fluid intelligence so that to make you understand my way of thinking, so notice from my definition above of what is a pattern, that fluid intelligence that is capable of discerning a more difficult pattern or coherent system is what we call smartness, so notice how in my above thoughts i have with my fluid intelligence descerned an important pattern or an important coherent system in the Moroccan couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui, also i have with my fluid intelligence discerned another important pattern or coherent system in Moroccan couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui, and here it is: When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient philosophy. And it is also my spirit. But you have to be "smart" to understand my example above, the double satisfaction is also the intellectual or cultural satisfaction and the material satisfaction, because knowing how to cook a Moroccan couscous is intellectual or cultural and eating a Moroccan couscous is material, and it is also a philosophy that shows that satisfaction is good, but the cultural and/or the material satisfaction needs the necessary effort by being responsability, and this cultural and material satisfaction is like an engine that push us forward towards more and more perfection, read my following thoughts of my political philosophy on morality to understand more clearly: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4 So now you are noticing that critical thinking needs not only fluid intelligence but it needs to diversify its knowledge by exploration , like in genetic algorithms , so that to be optimal. More political philosophy about: Is there free will? I have just looked at the following new interesting video of Lex Fridman: Lex Fridman is an AI researcher working on autonomous vehicles, human-robot interaction, and machine learning at MIT and beyond. Read more here about him here: https://lexfridman.com/#:~:text=Lex%20Fridman%3A%20I'm%20an,Podcast%3A%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20Podcast Here is his new video, please look at it carefully: Is there free will? | David Eagleman and Lex Fridman https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8f92iPYmiGY I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, and i will now answer the question of: Is there free will? I think that by analysing humans, we can predict with a probability that this human or that human has a certain "tendency", so it is like probability, so when we analyse a human, without measuring with IQ tests, we can say that a human has a tendency to be smart, then we can say that there is a high probability that he is smart, so then we can give some probabilistic predictions like that, so we can proceed by the same methodology for other human tendencies, so then is there any free will ? so i think that since we can not predict some human tendencies with 100% certainty, so we can logically say that the truth is not that humans have no free will. So i think that humans are a composition of free will and not free will. And more political philosophy about the good taste.. So let us look in the dictionary at what is the taste, it says the following: "The taste is the sense by which the qualities and flavour of a substance are distinguished by the taste buds." Read here in the dictionary to notice it: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/taste But when you are smart you will also notice that there is also the intellectual taste from culture or genetics, i mean that when you are genetically more rational and more smart you will notice that this more rational and more smart is also intellectual taste since with it you are able to be more efficiently selective of your knowledge, so it permits you to enhance quality, and this is also the same for culture, i mean when you enhance more your culture it enhances your intellectual taste and it permits you to be more efficiently selective of your knowledge, so it permits you to enhance quality. So as you are noticing that the intellectual taste is so important.. And i think that i have a good intellectual taste, read my thoughts here to notice it: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.programming/eAvSXpZwFgE Or read also my following thoughts to notice it: https://community.idera.com/developer-tools/general-development/f/getit-and-third-party/72501/pagerank-algorithm---the-mathematics-of-google-search Or read my following thoughts to notice it: https://community.idera.com/developer-tools/general-development/f/getit-and-third-party/71464/about-turing-completeness-and-parallel-programming This also why i said the following: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- I am a white arab, and i think i am more smart and i am an inventor of |
| aminer68@gmail.com: Aug 30 01:06PM -0700 Hello, Why Energy Is A Big And Rapidly Growing Problem For Data Centers It's either a breakthrough in our compute engines, or we need to get deadly serious about doubling the number of power plants on the planet. Read more here: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2017/12/15/why-energy-is-a-big-and-rapidly-growing-problem-for-data-centers/#1d126295a307 And read the following: Lightmatter Introduces Optical Processor to Speed Compute for Next-Gen AI "The Department of Energy estimates that by 2030, computing and communications technology will consume more than 8 percent of the world's power. Transistors, the workhorse of traditional processors, aren't improving; they're simply too hot. Building larger and larger datacenters is a dead end path along the road of computational progress," said Nicholas Harris, PhD, founder and CEO at Lightmatter. "We need a new computing paradigm. Lightmatter's optical processors are dramatically faster and more energy efficient than traditional processors. We're simultaneously enabling the growth of computing and reducing its impact on our planet." Read more here: https://www.techpowerup.com/271103/lightmatter-introduces-optical-processor-to-speed-compute-for-next-gen-ai I am a white arab that is an inventor of many scalable algorithms and there implementations, and now i will talk about: "How to beat Moore's Law ?" and more about: "Energy efficiency".. How to beat Moore's Law ? I think with the following discovery, Graphene can finally be used in CPUs, and it is a scale out method, read about the following discovery and you will notice it: New Graphene Discovery Could Finally Punch the Gas Pedal, Drive Faster CPUs Read more here: https://www.extremetech.com/computing/267695-new-graphene-discovery-could-finally-punch-the-gas-pedal-drive-faster-cpus The scale out method above with Graphene is very interesting, and here is the other scale up method with multicores and parallelism: Beating Moore's Law: Scaling Performance for Another Half-Century Read more here: https://www.infoworld.com/article/3287025/beating-moore-s-law-scaling-performance-for-another-half-century.html More about Energy efficiency.. You have to be aware that parallelization of the software can lower power consumption, and here is the formula that permits you to calculate the power consumption of "parallel" software programs: Power consumption of the total cores = (The number of cores) * ( 1/(Parallel speedup))^3) * (Power consumption of the single core). Also read the following about energy efficiency: Energy efficiency isn't just a hardware problem. Your programming language choices can have serious effects on the efficiency of your energy consumption. We dive deep into what makes a programming language energy efficient. As the researchers discovered, the CPU-based energy consumption always represents the majority of the energy consumed. What Pereira et. al. found wasn't entirely surprising: speed does not always equate energy efficiency. Compiled languages like C, C++, Rust, and Ada ranked as some of the most energy efficient languages out there, and Java and FreePascal are also good at Energy efficiency. Read more here: https://jaxenter.com/energy-efficient-programming-languages-137264.html RAM is still expensive and slow, relative to CPUs And "memory" usage efficiency is important for mobile devices. So Delphi and FreePascal compilers are also still "useful" for mobile devices, because Delphi and FreePascal are good if you are considering time and memory or energy and memory, and the following pascal benchmark was done with FreePascal, and the benchmark shows that C, Go and Pascal do rather better if you're considering languages based on time and memory or energy and memory. Read again here to notice it: https://jaxenter.com/energy-efficient-programming-languages-137264.html And more about beating Moore's Law with software.. But i think that there is some of the following constraints: "Modern programing environments contribute to the problem of software bloat by placing ease of development and portable code above speed or memory usage. While this is a sound business model in a commercial environment, it does not make sense where IT resources are constrained. Languages such as Java, C-Sharp, and Python have opted for code portability and software development speed above execution speed and memory usage, while modern data storage and transfer standards such as XML and JSON place flexibility and readability above efficiency." Read the following: https://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/overcoming-death-moores-law-role-software-advances-and-non-semiconductor-technologies Also there remains the following to also beat Moores's Law: "Improved Algorithms Hardware improvements mean little if software cannot effectively use the resources available to it. The Army should shape future software algorithms by funding basic research on improved software algorithms to meet its specific needs. The Army should also search for new algorithms and techniques which can be applied to meet specific needs and develop a learning culture within its software community to disseminate this information." Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| aminer68@gmail.com: Aug 30 11:27AM -0700 Hello, I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, and here is my new proverb: Note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as: "the act or process of perfecting" Read here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection This is the definition of perfection above that I use below in my explanation of my new proverb. Here is all my explanation of my new proverb below: My new proverb comes to me from the essence of morality that I explained to you in my political philosophy that I wrote in English, since in morality we are pushed towards the pretty tomorrow because we are aware of this pretty perfume that is the perfection that pushes us or encourages us to be or allows us to become perfect or greatly perfect. Read about it here on my thoughts of my political philosophy about morality: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4 So here is my new proverb: "Life is like the pretty perfume that calls us to be a pretty tomorrow!" So notice carefully my smart play on words in my new proverb, i think it's smart, and you have to know that the future perfection depends on the present perfection, so when today we are responsibility to be the pretty perfection so that to build the pretty tomorrow, then the pretty perfection of today is part of the pretty tomorrow, and the "pretty perfume" in my new proverb is also the today pretty perfection, but you have to understand the symbolic which allows us to say that being this part of the pretty tomorrow is also like being the pretty tomorrow. It is what makes it a smart proverb. thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| aminer68@gmail.com: Aug 30 11:16AM -0700 Hello, More political philosophy about the Moroccan couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui.. I am a white arab from Morocco that is living in Canada since year 1989 and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, and now i will do more political philosophy about the Moroccan couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui, here it is: https://tasteofmaroc.com/moroccan-couscous-with-seven-vegetables/ So as you are noticing you have to be smart, so when you look at this beautiful Moroccan couscous, there is different levels of abstraction, since you can simply look at it and remember and say that it is a beautiful Moroccan couscous, or you can be more smart and look at it from a different perspective and from a different level of abstraction and say that this beautiful Moroccan couscous requires Spices that give it the good taste, and when you are smart you will immediately make a logical analogy with political philosophy by saying that those Spices of this beautiful Moroccan couscous make, from the imperfection of a not so good taste, a perfection of a good taste, so you will say that it is the same for humans, since arabs and indians and south americans and such other ethnical groups can also use Spices in a form of good education and awareness so that to reduce by much there imperfections that give them a not so good taste , so that to be accepted by others, and now you are understanding that it is a good philosophy that calls for proactivity that wants people to have a good education and an awareness, and this is related to my following thoughts on hate, so read them carefully: You have to understand political philosophy, i think political philosophy must be "constructive", but what do i mean by constructive ? you will quickly notice that humans have human imperfections, but when you look at those human imperfection you can start to hate humans and hate our humanity, but this is not the good political philosophy, because you have to distinguish between two things: First, you can look at those human imperfections and hate humans and hate our humanity and then degenerate towards a much more violent system, second, you can look at those human imperfections and say that we have to transcend those human imperfections by being efficiently educated and by being efficiently organized globally and locally and by being efficiently trained and by being efficiently aware and conscious, so what will you choose ? so i think you are quickly understanding that Democracy has to be "proactive" by efficiently educating and by efficiently organizing globally and locally and by efficiently training and by efficiently making aware and conscious so that Democracy works correctly and so that we can transcend our human imperfections, so then i think that you are quickly noticing that it is the way that i am choosing so that to transcend our human imperfections, this is why you have noticed that i said previously the following: --- I am noticing that people here are quick at hating, notice that the white supremacist of soc.culture.china newsgroup called Byker is hating Chinese people and is hating other people around the world etc. and notice that people are quick at hating people because of there human imperfections, but i think that this is not wise because you can easily hate people and hate our world and hate our humanity, but when you are smart you will notice that you have not to fall into this trap of hating and hating people and hating our world and hating our humanity, because the best way is to be "constructive" and make people educated and aware and efficient so that we reduce much more there imperfections and so that we accept them and so that we don't fall into the trap of hating people and hating our world and hating our humanity. This is why i am talking as i am talking political philosophy. --- More political philosophy about the Moroccan couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui, here it is: https://tasteofmaroc.com/moroccan-couscous-with-seven-vegetables/ First i said the following about fluid intelligence: --- Here is my definition of "pattern", since i am using it below in my thoughts of my political philosophy: A pattern is a discernible coherent system based on the intended interrelationship of component parts. So you are understanding that fluid intelligence from genetics has to discern this coherent system and also extract the rule, it is also how we are extracting a theorem in mathematics, it is how works fluid intelligence from genetics. --- So as you are noticing i am using my fluid intelligence so that to make you understand my way of thinking, so notice from my definition above of what is a pattern, that fluid intelligence that is capable of discerning a more difficult pattern or coherent system is what we call smartness, so notice how in my above thoughts i have with my fluid intelligence descerned an important pattern or an important coherent system in the Moroccan couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui, also i have with my fluid intelligence discerned another important pattern or coherent system in Moroccan couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui, and here it is: When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient philosophy. And it is also my spirit. But you have to be "smart" to understand my example above, the double satisfaction is also the intellectual or cultural satisfaction and the material satisfaction, because knowing how to cook a Moroccan couscous is intellectual or cultural and eating a Moroccan couscous is material, and it is also a philosophy that shows that satisfaction is good, but the cultural and/or the material satisfaction needs the necessary effort by being responsability, and this cultural and material satisfaction is like an engine that push us forward towards more and more perfection, read my following thoughts of my political philosophy on morality to understand more clearly: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4 So now you are noticing that critical thinking needs not only fluid intelligence but it needs to diversify its knowledge by exploration , like in genetic algorithms , so that to be optimal. More political philosophy about: Is there free will? I have just looked at the following new interesting video of Lex Fridman: Lex Fridman is an AI researcher working on autonomous vehicles, human-robot interaction, and machine learning at MIT and beyond. Read more here about him here: https://lexfridman.com/#:~:text=Lex%20Fridman%3A%20I'm%20an,Podcast%3A%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20Podcast Here is his new video, please look at it carefully: Is there free will? | David Eagleman and Lex Fridman https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8f92iPYmiGY I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, and i will now answer the question of: Is there free will? I think that by analysing humans, we can predict with a probability that this human or that human has a certain "tendency", so it is like probability, so when we analyse a human, without measuring with IQ tests, we can say that a human has a tendency to be smart, then we can say that there is a high probability that he is smart, so then we can give some probabilistic predictions like that, so we can proceed by the same methodology for other human tendencies, so then is there any free will ? so i think that since we can not predict some human tendencies with 100% certainty, so we can logically say that the truth is not that humans have no free will. So i think that humans are a composition of free will and not free will. And more political philosophy about the good taste.. So let us look in the dictionary at what is the taste, it says the following: "The taste is the sense by which the qualities and flavour of a substance are distinguished by the taste buds." Read here in the dictionary to notice it: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/taste But when you are smart you will also notice that there is also the intellectual taste from culture or genetics, i mean that when you are genetically more rational and more smart you will notice that this more rational and more smart is also intellectual taste since with it you are able to be more efficiently selective of your knowledge, so it permits you to enhance quality, and this is also the same for culture, i mean when you enhance more your culture it enhances your intellectual taste and it permits you to be more efficiently selective of your knowledge, so it permits you to enhance quality. So as you are noticing that the intellectual taste is so important.. And i think that i have a good intellectual taste, read my thoughts here to notice it: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.programming/eAvSXpZwFgE Or read also my following thoughts to notice it: https://community.idera.com/developer-tools/general-development/f/getit-and-third-party/72501/pagerank-algorithm---the-mathematics-of-google-search Or read my following thoughts to notice it: https://community.idera.com/developer-tools/general-development/f/getit-and-third-party/71464/about-turing-completeness-and-parallel-programming This also why i said the following: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- I am a white arab, and i think i am more smart and i am an inventor of many scalable algorithms, but today i will speak about a very important thing and it is how to build a civilization, because i think that we have to be smart and notice that so that to build a civilization there is a very important requirement and it is that it must be an effort of building a civilization, so we have not to be like a coward that neglect to be this effort of building a civilization, so the effort of building a civilization is so important, so we have to be responsability, and also we have to know by how we have to be guided to this effort of building a civilization, so we have to be guided by the good taste that also permits to be efficiently selective to be able to be a greater quality or perfection and we have to be not violence that permits to be less individualistic and that permits to be more order and that permits to be more organized. And read the following about the good taste: Why we should stand up for good taste https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20140605-what-makes-good-taste ---------------------------------------------------------------------- So as you are noticing that i am not saying above that civilization needs smartness, because you have to understand that since it is inherent to a civilization that it needs smartness, so i am not talking about it, i am just talking about the above important requirements to be a civilization, and you will notice that i am talking about the following requirement of being civilization: "that we have to be not violence that permits to be less individualistic and that permits to be more order and that permits to be more organized", so as you are noticing that, like in democracy and in morality, it is also extremism of violence that has to be avoided in a civilization and this is in accordance with the tendency of the essence of morality(read below to notice it). More political philosophy about Universal Democracy I have just read the following article on a white supremacist website called National vanguard, so i invite you to read it: Universal Democracy https://nationalvanguard.org/2020/06/universal-democracy/ I don't agree with the article above that we have to limit Democracy that way, because this "universal" Democracy is the basis principle that allows to give a voice to different parts or groups of the society and it allows a kind of balance that avoids to the society to become too violent, so it is an important ingredient in Democracy. Please read my following thoughts to understand more: More political philosophy about white supremacism and neo-nazism.. Read the following new article from a white supremacist website from USA called national vanguard: We Know The True American Type And We Know The Liberal https://nationalvanguard.org/2020/08/we-know-the-true-american-type-and-we-know-the-liberal/ So i am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, so i have to be frank, so look at the following writing of the above article: "Today it teaches the doctrine of liberalism with its pacifism, its love for the inferior and misbegotten, its internationalism which makes a virtue out of treason, its hatred of all who possess strong national feelings, its toothless desire for racial equality, and its tolerance of everything and everyone, particularly the alien and the unfit." So as you are noticing that the above article is making a logical inconsistency, since take for example "beauty", we can say by the same logic as the above article that since beauty is much less important than technical efficiency, so we have to pay beauty much less money than technical efficiency, but if you say so you are questioning the very basic fondations of what we call a civilization, since our kind of civilization comes with a kind of tolerance that permits it , this is part of the backbone of our civilization, it is also this kind of tolerance that permits us to be the right tolerance and compassion towards the unfit and towards the alien, and if you change this, i think this will make our societies much more and too violent societies, so you have to understand it so that to understand the backbone of our civilization. Second logical inconsistency of the above article, it is that those white supremacists are giving too much importance to genetics, neglecting at same time the power of culture and learning and awareness that permit or can permit other ethnic groups such as arabs and south americans and indians to become much better humans. More precision about capitalism and about National Vanguard.. I will be more rigorous, so read again: I have just read the following article from a white supremacist website called National Vanguard: Why Capitalism Fails https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/07/why-capitalism-fails/ And it is saying the following about why capitalism fails: "Capitalism permits inheritance, the command transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner. And therein is the flaw: inherited wealth isn't earned by its owner, yet it leads to a class segregation of men that has nothing to do with how much wealth they have earned; i.e., nothing to do with how much or how well or how significantly they have worked." I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, and i will answer with my fluid intelligence: I think the above article is not taking into account the risk factor and and the smartness factor, so there have to be mechanisms, that are like engines, that "encourage" to or/and "make" a part of the people work by taking risks or great risks and by doing there best (so that to become rich) or/and that "encourage" to or/and "make" the smartest to give there best with there smartness (so that to become rich), so i think capitalism has those mechanisms in form of |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment