- OT: Help to disprove this theory - 12 Updates
- neonumeric - C++ arbitrary precision arithmetic library - 4 Updates
- Detecting infinite recursion - 1 Update
| Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com>: Mar 05 01:21PM +0300 Lew Pitcher: > See, also, "Russell's teapot", in that the philosophic > burden of proof lies upon a person making unfalsifiable > claims In my opinion, unfalsifiable clams are useless in that they contain no meaninful information. -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ http://preview.tinyurl.com/qcy6mjc [archived] |
| "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Mar 05 11:17AM -0500 On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 18:43:21 -0000 (UTC) > > scientifically or Biblically? > [snip] > It is not ours to disprove; it is yours to prove Until our telescopes capture a planet ferry bringing a prototype Earth being constructed from one planet to another, and we see it exiting or entering at the pole of that planet, it's unprovable. However, it should be easy to disprove if other theories are correct. -- Rick C. Hodgin |
| "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Mar 05 11:19AM -0500 On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 20:21:14 +0100 > Can you please post your thoughts where they are appropriate ? I marked it Off-Topic. Too much reality for you? Can't handle it? Seriously. If this theory is correct, it must change the thinking of every human being on the planet. It deserves attention. -- Rick C. Hodgin |
| Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca>: Mar 05 04:32PM On Fri, 05 Mar 2021 11:17:59 -0500, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > being constructed from one planet to another, and we see it exiting or > entering at the pole of that planet, it's unprovable. > However, it should be easy to disprove if other theories are correct. You are, then, accorded all the permission we can grant to prove or disprove your hypothesis. I guess that you are in for a lifetime of staring through a telescope, hoping to catch a deity shuffling planets around. Luck be with you. -- Lew Pitcher "In Skills, We Trust" |
| Stuart Redmann <DerTopper@web.de>: Mar 05 05:36PM +0100 > Earth and the current Earth's size indicated hints at the planets in > line being part of a solar system assembly line of sorts. The rest of > the manufacturing process also naturally followed from that realization. One counter-argument against the assembly line theory would be that the continents only fit together when they lie on a sphere with the same diameter as Earth's current diameter. If you somehow took the continents from Earth and put them on a smaller sphere, they would no longer fit together. They only fit together in the „current" Earth. This indicates that they formed a singular land mass, which is also indicated by extrapolating their current drift into the past. BTW, what means „Biblical Cycle"? Is this one year? Regards, Stuart |
| "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Mar 05 11:53AM -0500 On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 17:36:01 +0100 > longer fit together. They only fit together in the „current" Earth. > This indicates that they formed a singular land mass, which is also > indicated by extrapolating their current drift into the past. That's not true. Here's someone who put together a video showing how they fit together on a smaller Earth. Also, if you measure the surface area of the Earth (including those areas under water that are shallow and clearly part of the original content structures, and adjust back for their flattening out and spreading out over time, it's very close to the surface area of Mars today. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJfBSc6e7QQ Neal Adams is not a Christian, and he simply believes all the plants are growing. But the Earth's continents do fit together perfectly on a smaller Earth. > BTW, what means „Biblical Cycle"? Is this one year? Biblical Cycle = 7,000 years. -- Rick C. Hodgin |
| Mr Flibble <flibble@i42.REMOVETHISBIT.co.uk>: Mar 05 05:00PM On 05/03/2021 16:53, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: >> Rick C. Hodgin <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Do you know of anyone who can disprove this theory either > But the Earth's continents do fit together perfectly on a smaller Earth. A continent is only a continent because the fucking oceans are covering the land between the continents, fucktard. Continental drift happens as evidenced by the various trenches on the seabed and it happened over the period of billions of years not thousands. Go back to school and learn science properly you god bothering fruit loop. /Flibble -- π |
| "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Mar 05 03:31PM -0500 On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 17:00:29 +0000 > > Earth. > A continent is only a continent because the .. oceans are > covering the land between the continents, .. . Yes. You take the continents that exist today with oceans between them and work backward toward the formation they were in before they split off and became separated. This video does that (begins at 3:10): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJfBSc6e7QQ&t=3m10s > happens as evidenced by the various trenches on the seabed and it > happened over the period of billions of years not thousands. Go back > to school and learn science properly you god bothering fruit loop. Yes, you can see those "scrapings" along the bottom of the sea floor in the maps on my website: http://www.3alive.org http://www.3alive.org/images/2008__sea_floor_age__map_perspective.png http://www.3alive.org/images/2008__sea_floor_age__continent_perspectives.png The man on that video talks about millions of years, but if you adjust the scale to the time approximately from the flood (4400 years ago) to the time approximately at/around the time of Jesus (2000 years ago), then the increase coincides with Biblical markers. People began living fewer years after the flood. Many of the animals that exist before the flood did not survive for long after the flood, namely the dinosaurs and big animals like that. The Earth changed. The flood covered the entire world. Where'd all that water go? It receded away from the land because the surface area of the Earth grew, and the continents began to separate. The water went to fill in the places that expanding, providing also coolant for the upcoming magma that serves as a band-aid for the expansion. Now, Leigh, this is a theory. I could be wrong. I'm looking for something to disprove it. Claims of millions or billions of years also theory. They do not disprove it. I'm looking for proof. I'm seeking the truth. If you're able to participate, please do. But please refrain from profanity and obscenity. You're better than that. You have more to offer than that. -- Rick C. Hodgin |
| Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk>: Mar 05 09:57PM On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 15:31:38 -0500 "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote: [snip] > Now, Leigh, this is a theory. I could be wrong. I'm looking for > something to disprove it. Claims of millions or billions of years also > theory. They do not disprove it. Your mental instability is getting the better of you. Your proposition is not a theory, it is a conjecture, and an absurd one at that. Theories (such as the one your offhand remarks appear to be trying to disparage) are supported by experimental or other evidence, and you have none at all. Until you have some evidence for your absurd conjecture which is capable of surplanting the theories which are supported by evidence, your life would be made more supportable if you obtained medical assistance. Also, sticking "OT" in the header doesn't mean it is OK to post your off topic nonsense. |
| Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu>: Mar 05 03:45PM -0700 > followed by reclamation and recycling as the next planet steps up to > serve the role of the next Earth, as the current Earth goes into > recycling. Coincidentally, last night's Gospel reading in Mass was the parable of Lazarus and the rich man, from Luke. You may recall the rich man ends up asking Abraham to send Lazarus to his brothers, that he might warn them what awaits if they don't change their ways. After some back and forth Abraham says, 'If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.' Similarly, if the existing copious fossil record, carbon-14 dating, and, well, *everything* else isn't enough to convince you that this "theory" is utter nonsense, then there is no proof you will accept. |
| "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Mar 05 05:48PM -0500 On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 21:57:22 +0000 > that. Theories (such as the one your offhand remarks appear to be > trying to disparage) are supported by experimental or other evidence, > and you have none at all. The evidence is based on an examination of existing things and ascribing a new meaning to their existence: 1) We don't know the outer planets are gas giants. 2) We don't know why those plants have giant hexagon shapes. 2) We don't know why the outer plants have so many moons. 3) We don't know why the surface of Venus has pancake formations. 4) We don't know why Venus has so few crater marks. 5) We don't know why Venus is so hot and has an acid atmosphere. 6) We don't know why Venus is rotating so slowly, and backwards. 7) We don't know why Uranus and Neptune are roughly the same size. 8) We don't know why Jupiter gives off more heat than it receives from the Sun. 9) We don't know why there is this giant red spot on Jupiter. 10) We don't know why the asteroid belt exists. 11) Our own Earth shows it used to be smaller by the sea floor maps. This theory puts meaning to it: 1) They are not gas giants. They're manufacturing facilities. 2) They are doors / gateways which let the proto-Earths in/out. 3) They are resource manufacturing facilities, processing plants, each with their specific task. Europa. Io. Titan. It gives each of them real meaning and purpose in this perspective. 4) Venus in its orbit is young, and it's being actively processed. 5) Venus used to be an Earth and is being recycled. It started out much more like our planet 6,000 years ago, but the re- cycling process has been going on and it's getting to more and more aggressive stages. 6) It's part of the heating cycle. It's designed to heat up the planet tremendously, as we can observe how much things cool off each night here on Earth, and on Mars and the moon, when it's out of the Sun's light. Venus is raging hot. And I be- lieve it's going backwards because it's been flipped over. What used to be Antarctica on that prior Earth is now where we would say the North Pole is, as I believe Antarctica is a special continent that's a gateway to the inner parts of the Earth. 7) They are processing full-sized Earths preparing them for the later parts of the manufacturing process. They hold a certain number of full-sized Earths inside. 8) Jupiter is responsible for laying down the bedrock layers, what our scientists tell us is billions of years of sediment and lava and what not. It's actually the result of huge, and I mean huge, batch towers of various rock mixtures that are heated in incredible heating facilities, and then deposited like pancake batter over the surface in many square mile areas most likely. These things require heat, and there is most likely some radiation source providing the heat. It's also why Jupiter has such a strong radiation signature. It's this huge system created for melting rock and depositing it all over the surface of the Earths being constructed. And there are probably 60 or more Earths in various stages of construct- ion in there, and each stage takes about 7,000 years to com- plete. It's many 100s of thousands of years to construct a single Earth, and its in-service duty is only 7,000 years, which tells you how valuable God finds us (people). He goes through all of this to give us a chance to prove to Him who we are, what we'll believe, whether we'll seek the truth or believe the lie, etc. 9) That red spot is something like a painting facility. It is a mixing system designed to prepare the materials that will be deposited on the surface. It's why Mars is red as well, as that area is where the materials are put onto Mars, or in- side of Mars or whatever. 10) The asteroid belt is actually the great ring of Jupiter, far bigger than Saturn's rings. It's so big that it cannot orbit the planet. So, it's in orbit around the Sun always in close proximity to the planet. And our telescopes have actually caught asteroids crashing into part of Jupiter, which I believe is part of its purpose. The asteroids are hurled at Jupiter with great velocity and they are smashed onto an area that can take the pounding. The asteroids then explode into manageable chunks, which go into the heating facilities distributed all over the planet, which deposit the layers on the Earths being constructed. 11) Long note below: This is what got me started on this. I had the thought, "The Earth used to be smaller" occur to me. I got up and did some research and found the NOAA and GEBCO maps, and the Neal Adams video. I realized that the Earth did used to be smaller. This is observable. The continents fit together. On a smaller Earth they also fit together in 3D and at all places. We've been taught otherwise, but we were taught wrong on purpose (by the enemy anti-Christ spirit that seeks to see all of us not coming to a saving knowledge of Christ, by teaching us things are natural, without God, without design, etc.). Once I realized the Earth used to be smaller I said to myself, "Okay. Let's say it did. Now what? What does that mean?" From the framework of accepting the Bible as true, I began to then realize that the Earth would not continue growing forever. That we have been on this planet now for about 6,000 years, and there is an upcoming 1,000 year Millennial Reign of Christ, and that the Earth would not exceed beyond the 7,000 years due to the Biblical narrative. So I said, "Okay. Let's assume that's true. What else do we know?" And I remembered John talking about seeing a new Heaven and a new Earth, for the first Heaven and the first Earth had passed away, and there was no more sea. And I said, "Okay. A new Heaven and a new Earth. Where would they come from? The Bible says in the beginning God made the heavens and the Earth." And then I began to think about that initial creation. I realized that in the beginning God created the first apple tree. But He used the system He created to create the second generation, and so on. And it's true of everything else. People ask "Which came first the chicken or the egg?" God created the chicken, male and female, and He also created the natural processes within those chickens to produce subsequent generations. His act of creation was not just the thing, but the system which perpetuates the thing. So I said, "Okay. God's created systems like this. Maybe He created a system for the Earths, because we know in scripture there are at least two." And I thought, "What is our Earth?" It's a planet. "Where is our planet?" In our solar system. "What is our solar system?" And I began to see it all coalesce before my eyes. I looked at Mars, and I saw that it was about the size of the smaller Earth. I did some calculations of land areas and the surface area of Mars and it was within 1%. I looked at Venus, which is so close to our own planet's size, and I began to ask myself "What is happening there?" And I remembered reading an article once about how the radar satellites they sent to Venus had found solidified metal in the higher areas. Venus is 860F+ on the surface, but up at higher altitude it's cooler. There were various forms of metals that had melted down low and then, like snow, became hardened in the higher elevations. And it struck me, "It's being recycled!" And then the whole rest of it began to fall into place. "How would the Earths be built?" They'd have to be built in stages. And I remembered how God had sent me to two factories to do computer work where I saw assembly lines, both using the Japanese method of manufacturing, by the way, where things are manufactured as needed and there are no great stockpiles of inventory. I began to see the moons on the planets as resource production facilities, with such obvious cues like Europa, and Titan, and also Io. Such specialized and diverse moons it was just amazing. The other ones also have purpose, but it's unknown to me what they do. I began to consider each planet, and through prayer, and thought, and remembering things I've seen and read throughout my past, the whole theory fell into place. I began working on my simulation to demonstrate it, and I could see how it would all work. I've tried to contact scientists about it. They all literally ignore me and stop communicating with me. I've posted it on science forums, and I've been blocked and banned from every one. I tried posting on Reddit and I was banned for life on my first ever post!! But, they later changed it to a 30 day suspension, though I haven't been back. I'm to the place where I want people to step up and show me something from a satellite or from a Bible passage which says this theory cannot be true. I've searched high and low with my own experience and knowledge and research, both in science areas and in the Bible, and I find nothing that contradicts it. It actually explains several things that I've never heard consistent messages on previously, such as why did Jesus have to cure the blind man twice. The first time he reports "I see men as trees walking." Does Jesus make mistakes? No. So, that wasn't a mistake it was information, which also gives a clue about the nature of everything, but I'm not ready to disclose that part yet. > if you obtained medical assistance. > Also, sticking "OT" in the header doesn't mean it is OK to post your > off topic nonsense. I wish you were nicer and more helpful, Chris. I'm talking about a theory that, if true, will fundamentally change everybody's thinking about our solar system, our existence, God, Jesus, everything. It will bring all of it into quick focus where we can actually see, and it is actually provable, the incredible greatness of God in His creation, and in Jesus seeking to forgive our sin so we can be a part of this system outside of this mere 7,000 year time on this Earth here. What happens after the New Jerusalem and after judgment? The 8th day begins, which is a corollary to the everlasting covenant between God and man given to us in the form of circumcision, a mark upon our flesh that maintains and reminds us of the covenant. The real 8th day is the eternal day that begins after the 7,000 years (7th day) is over, and after all judgment is made (the excess "flesh" is removed), which is why the circumcision was given to man on the 8th day. It all fits together. It's still a theory, but there aren't any holes in it when you look at it from these perspectives, which are the Biblical ones, the truth-seeking ones, the ones that keep God involved in all parts of our existence. When you cast God to the curb you wind up with billions of years and the Big Bang which created everything out of nothing, and dark matter and all that nonsense which is a slap in the face against God. God's creation of things is far more than what we've been taught by the lying anti-Christ spirit at work in sinful men seeking to glorify themselves and their careers by listening literally to evil spirits giving them ideas that sound plausible to the flesh mind, but are not at all based on truth. The truth is: God created everything. Jesus is our savior. We do have a soul. We are under judgment and condemnation for sin. Jesus came to take our sin away. And right now we know in part, but then (on the other side of this world, be it by death or transformation), we will know the truth. I look forward to seeing what people come up with to disprove this theory. It may still be wrong. But so far as I'm aware today, it has not been disproven. -- Rick C. Hodgin |
| "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Mar 05 05:51PM -0500 On Fri, 05 Mar 2021 15:45:11 -0700 > Similarly, if the existing copious fossil record, carbon-14 dating, > and, well, *everything* else isn't enough to convince you that this > "theory" is utter nonsense, then there is no proof you will accept. Carbon-14 dating has been proving unreliable in the laboratory. The fossil record is explainable by the flood. And "everything else" is also explainable to from the Biblical perspective. You don't seek the truth, Joe. You've listened to what they've taught you and believed it. That's not damnable, but it's also not a true truth-seeking goal. I can remember sitting in 3rd grade listening to my teachers teaching us about the solar system and thinking to myself, "How do they know?" And then realizing in high school and college and after that they don't know. They're also theorizing and guessing. There's a purposeful agenda by the anti-Christ spirit at work in this world to deceive people, to take God out of everything, to make everything a cold process removed from God's hand and love and involvement in our daily lives. The truth is far more interesting. And eternal. -- Rick C. Hodgin |
| Mr Flibble <flibble@i42.REMOVETHISBIT.co.uk>: Mar 05 04:51PM neonumeric - C++ arbitrary precision arithmetic library with arbitrary precision integers, floats and rationals: https://github.com/i42output/neonumeric It hasn't been formally released yet as it still requires more extensive testing. It will be used as part of my universal compiler, neos, that can compile any programming language and will be used for the neos implementation of Python (Python has big integers). Message ends. /Flibble -- π |
| Python <python@python.invalid>: Mar 05 06:31PM +0100 Mr Flibble wrote: > implementation of Python (Python has big integers). > Message ends. > /Flibble This post is 100% off topic on this group. |
| Brian Wood <woodbrian77@gmail.com>: Mar 05 09:56AM -0800 On Friday, March 5, 2021 at 10:51:42 AM UTC-6, Mr Flibble wrote: > testing. It will be used as part of my universal compiler, neos, that can > compile any programming language and will be used for the neos implementation of > Python (Python has big integers). The repo says: Free C++ library for arbitrary-precision arithmetic (permissive software license). Features: Multiple precision integers, floats and rationals. Numbers can be any fixed precision (specifiable as a template parameter) or can dynamically grow in precision based on the precision of operands. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I suggest changing a few things: Arithmetic C++ library (permissive software license) Arbitrary-precision integers, floats and rationals. Numbers can be fixed precision (specifiable as a template parameter) or can grow in precision based on the precision of operands. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- That gets rid of the phrase "multiple precision" which in my opinion is not the same as arbitrary. Brian Ebenezer Enterprises - "Abundant peace belongs to those who love Your instruction; nothing can make them stumble." Psalms 119:165 https://webEbenezer.net https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards |
| Mr Flibble <flibble@i42.REMOVETHISBIT.co.uk>: Mar 05 06:55PM On 05/03/2021 17:31, Python wrote: >> Message ends. >> /Flibble > This post is 100% off topic on this group. Try reading what I actually wrote, dear. /Flibble -- π |
| mickcarrot@vegetables.com: Mar 05 10:10AM On Thu, 04 Mar 2021 12:20:19 -0800 >> No kindly shove your patronising attitude up your arse and fuck off. >[...] >Welcome to my killfile. I encourage others to do likewise. I hate to break the news to you, but killfiles stopped being any use sometime around the early 90s. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment