- [OT] The Solar System Assembly Line - 5 Updates
- Tricky question - 3 Updates
| "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Mar 28 12:51AM -0400 The videos below link to a theory that our solar system is not what we've been taught, but is an Earth manufacturing system, with each Earth being not the goal, but rather the people of the Earth being the goal. It brings together Biblical teachings to what our science has actually reported seeing in space in our solar system from flybys, telescope observations, orbiting probes, etc. Response to a March 27, 2021 Anton Petrov video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Okv6YPu6AHQ An overview of the theory: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGdVtSh4wRs Check the descriptions for link to prior-generation videos created during development of the demo. And visit www.3alive.org to download the age of the sea floor maps, and to GET THE SOURCE CODE to the demo at the GitHub link. The project is written in Visual Studio and runs on Windows. I'm basically looking for real evidence which can disprove the theory. Hard and fast facts. I'm looking for science data or Bible facts which make it categorically not possible. Refuting this theory with another theory is insufficient. I want it to be wholly thwarted, or to be then given consideration if it can't be thwarted. -- Rick C. Hodgin [Jesus Loves You] |
| wij <wyniijj@gmail.com>: Mar 28 06:01AM -0700 On Sunday, 28 March 2021 at 12:51:28 UTC+8, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > -- > Rick C. Hodgin > [Jesus Loves You] People have the right to believe the fact they like. Unfortunately, fact is also subjective, eventually. Sorry, I have to ask an irrelevant question: I cannot post new topic. The button [New conversation] always pops up a window sending to comp.lang.c. How can I create a New conversation (using Linux+firefox)? |
| David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>: Mar 28 03:56PM +0200 On 28/03/2021 15:01, wij wrote: > I cannot post new topic. The button [New conversation] always pops up a > window sending to comp.lang.c. How can I create a New conversation > (using Linux+firefox)? Google groups is broken - amongst its many flaws (and some advantages), it currently will not let you post a new thread in a group with symbols in the name, like comp.lang.c++. The best suggestion is to get a proper Usenet client and server. A common free choice is Thunderbird for the client, news.eternal-september.org as the server. (There are many other clients and servers according to preference.) |
| wij <wyniijj@gmail.com>: Mar 28 08:41AM -0700 On Sunday, 28 March 2021 at 21:56:44 UTC+8, David Brown wrote: > common free choice is Thunderbird for the client, > news.eternal-september.org as the server. (There are many other clients > and servers according to preference.) Thanks for the info. I cannot make it work, I'll try it latter. |
| Mr Flibble <flibble@i42.REMOVETHISBIT.co.uk>: Mar 28 11:26PM +0100 On 28/03/2021 05:51, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > make it categorically not possible. Refuting this theory with another > theory is insufficient. I want it to be wholly thwarted, or to be then > given consideration if it can't be thwarted. It isn't a fucking theory because there is no fucking evidence backing it up. /Flibble -- π |
| Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>: Mar 28 08:46AM +0200 Is there a way to enforce that an object can be only instantiated as a temporary ? |
| "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com>: Mar 28 01:57PM +0200 On 28.03.2021 08:46, Bonita Montero wrote: > Is there a way to enforce that an object > can be only instantiated as a temporary ? No, because you can always bind it to a reference. When an object such as an operator[] proxy result shouldn't outlive the object that it refers to one could in principle guarantee that by having all the objects dynamically allocated and using shared_ptr. But that impacts negatively on efficiency, clarity, debuggability etc. plus yields more awkward usage notation. One could then much better switch to Java, C# or Rust. So just add a stern comment in the relevant place. - Alf |
| Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>: Mar 28 09:05PM +0200 > No, because you can always bind it to a reference. I could assume that no one would be so stupid to do sth. like this: Obj const &o = Obj(); So if I make this assumption, what's the solution ? |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment