| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jul 30 08:16AM -0700 Hello, More my philosophy about regression to the mean and about the definition of what is human identity and about the deeper understanding of the kinds of human identity and about Islam and religion and about Moroccan english songs and about new and future technologies and about the essence of philosophy and about and about Ultra-processed foods and about self-interest and about the GDP per capita and about philosopher Heraclitus and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I have just read the following article from white supremacists and neo-nazis from the national vanguard and i invite you to read it and my answer is below: Regression: Only one way to escape https://nationalvanguard.org/2023/07/regression-only-one-way-to-escape-it/ So notice that it is saying the following: "..It happens because the recessive genes in the parents are likely to be typical of their race, even if they have a fortunate set of dominant genes." So i say that the above saying is not scientific, since science says that there is "regression to the mean", but science also says that people get their genetic makeup "only" from their parents, so the above saying from national vanguard is not true, and you can read the following article published in Towards Data Science so that to understand it: https://towardsdatascience.com/regression-to-the-mean-and-its-implications-648660c9bf76 So i have just said the following: "So i think the human identity is: The most simple human identity that permits to recognize a human, like your name , and the simple human identity as saying that you are french , and the human identity that permits you to be accepted by others and that comes from the acts of perfecting much more the simple identity, but i think that my new model below of my philosophy says that the vast majority of humans are not violent, so we have not to be pessimistic about the human identity that permits you to be accepted by others." So i have just put an important pattern in my above definition of what is identity, and it is that notice how i am saying: "..and the human identity that permits you to be accepted by others" So as you are noticing, there is the way of enumerating the human identities by hierarchy, but i have not done it, but my definition is a kind of general definition that doesn't come with a kind of negativity, since the human identity is also the to be "successful" that permits you to be accepted by others (as successful), so you are noticing that my way of defining is general without coming with a kind of negativity in the definition, since as i am saying it below by talking about what is the essence of philosophy , that i have also to be this kind of positive spirit. So i invite you to reread all my following previous thoughts so that to understand my new model of my philosophy and so that to understand my views about different subjects: So i have just said the following, read it below in my previous thoughts: "..and the human identity that permits you to be accepted by others and that comes from the acts of perfecting much more the simple identity" So you have to be smart and understand that when we are still young, we are thinking about how to be accepted by others, for example we are thinking that we have to be well educated so that to be accepted by others, so it is why i am saying that the human identity comes from the acts of perfecting much more the simple identity that i am defining below, but you have to understand that in philosophy, humans want to be "happy", so they are demanding "quality", but i am saying below that we have not to be pessimistic about it and about the human identity that permits you to be accepted by others, since my new model below of my philosophy says that the vast majority of humans are not violent, so i invite you to reread all my below previous thoughts so that to understand my new model of my philosophy and so that to understand my views on different subjects: So i think the human identity is: The most simple human identity that permits to recognize a human like your name , and the simple human identity as saying that you are french , and the human identity that permits you to be accepted by others and that comes from the acts of perfecting much more the simple identity, but i think that my new model below of my philosophy says that the vast majority of humans are not violent, so we have not to be pessimistic about the human identity that permits you to be accepted by others, so i invite you to reread all my below thoughts so that to understand my new model of my philosophy and so that to understand my views on different subjects: I have just looked at the following video , and i invite you to look at it carefully: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/kuuF_YP1cb4 So i think i am discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence in the above video, and it is that the West is not understanding correctly, since the countries that you call muslims are mostly not muslims, but they are like republican conservatives in USA, since i mean that republican conservatives are mostly not religious , but they have religious values since they are conservatives, since a conservative has for example to protect the family values and such, so it is the same in muslim countries, since people in muslim countries are mostly not religious , but they use religious values so that to protect family values and such, and it is the same for the ones that you call muslims in France. So i come from Morocco and i think i am also a new philosopher, but i am also an inventor of many poems of Love and poems and you can read them in the below web link, and i am also an inventor of many proverbs and you can read them in the below web link, but i am also a musician who knows about music, so since i come from Morocco and i am moroccan, so i invite you to listen to how look like Moroccan songs and music in "english", so since Morocco is adapting quickly by also speaking english, so i invite you to listen to the following Moroccan new singer called Ahmed Chawki that also sings in english, and he is a singer, songwriter and producer and he has composed all his songs in english too, and his style of his english songs don't look like black Rap songs and music , but they come with a Moroccan style, so first you can read about him here in wikepedia: Ahmed Chawki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmed_Chawki And here is some of his beautiful songs in english, so i invite you to look at them and listen to them carefully so that you learn more about how moroccans sing in english: Here is the first one: Chawki ft. Dr. Alban - It's My Live (Don't Worry) [Official Video] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-ynORiAe30 And look at the following other beautiful song from him: Chawki - Time Of Our Lives (Official Music Video) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8_QrWfnGCo&list=RDF8_QrWfnGCo&start_radio=1 So i also invite you to read my interesting new thoughts in the following web link about the new and future technologies: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/lfnlD52jDzI So i think i am a new philosopher, and i will now talk about the essence of philosophy, so the interesting philosophical question is what is the essence of philosophy ? So i think that the essence of philosophy is that when you look at human life and say that human life is not beautiful and not worth it, so it is not the good way of philosophy, so in philosophy we have to have a "purpose", so in philosophy the purpose needs an important requirement that is that you have to be "pragmatic", and in philosophy it is not enough to say to people to be pragmatic so that to be able to construct the purpose, since in philosophy you have to know how to create the positive spirit that brings the positive energy that permits to follow the way of the purpose and that permits also to regulate correctly the self-interest that i am talking about in my below thoughts when i am talking about president Putin, so then you are noticing more clearly the way of my philosophy, so i have to construct the purpose , but i have also the bring the positive spirit that brings the positive energy, so then i think that the essence of philosophy is about the purpose , since you have like to convince people about the purpose that you are creating and you have to explain the how , so you are noticing that it is the way of convincing, so you have to create the positive spirit and you have to have a diplomatic way of doing it. I invite you to read the following new interesting article: Ultra-processed foods largely missing from US food policy Read more here: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/07/230720124604.htm And Ultra-processed foods may be linked to increased risk of cancer "For every 10 per cent increase in ultra-processed food in a person's diet, there was an increased incidence of 2 per cent for cancer overall, and a 19 per cent increase for ovarian cancer specifically. Each 10 per cent increase in ultra-processed food consumption was also associated with increased mortality for cancer overall by 6 per cent, alongside a 16 per cent increase for breast cancer and a 30 per cent increase for ovarian cancer." Read more here: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/01/230131183131.htm And you can read my thoughts in the following web link about cancer and about new interesting medical treatments and drugs: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/3HwdSeO3esc So i have just looked at the following video of president Putin, and i invite you to look at it: Exclusive: Full Interview With Russian President Vladimir Putin https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6pJd6O_NT0 So i think i am also a new philosopher, and i am discovering an important pattern with my fluid intelligence in the above video, so i think that the journalist that is doing the interview is naive in philosophy, since president Putin has also self-interest(s) that can go against the interest of USA or against the interest of European Union or such, so for example president Putin has an interest in Syria and you have to think about it carefully so that to understand what kind of interest is it, so the above journalist is not smart, since he has to ask a smart question of: In for example the private sector in capitalism, self-interest is most of time regulated by "competition" so that to not lead to corruption, so you have to be smart and not ask stupid questions to president Putin, since if you want justice, you have to ask if there is mechanism(s) that bring justice, like by logical analogy in capitalism with competition that most of time regulates self-interest so that to not lead to corruption, so you have to ask the question of if self-interest has to have democratic principles and/or competition or such, so that it be regulated correctly. So i think that looking at the GDP per capita of african countries is not a good indicator of what looks like the conditions of living, since the GDP per capita can be increased much more by increasing much more productivity, and so that to increase much more productivity and quality, you have to specialize in what you do better and you have to use automation and technology so that to increase much more productivity and quality, but i think that african countries are not so bad, since there is specialization in what you do better in Africa and Africa can import technologies or robots so that it optimize much more , so then i think that we have not to be pessimistic about Africa since it will rapidly increase much more the GDP per capita, but of course African countries have to diversify more there economies so that they make there economies resilient, and they have to make the private sector the powerful motor of the economy since it is good for the economy and it also lower much more corruption, and i think that implementing democratic principles is an easy thing to do, so i think we have to be optimistic about Africa, and about implementing the modern way of the modern monetarist school of economics of Milton Friedman, you can read more about my thoughts about productivity and capitalism and more in the following web link: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/KN4V-rGRDdU I have just looked at the following video about the philosopher Heraclitus and i invite you to look at it: Heraclitus: Union of opposites, change & logos https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QzpXFyYOLIU So i think i am a new philosopher, and i think the above philosopher that we call Heraclitus talks about the Union of opposites..., but i think that my philosophy is different, since i think the problematic is not just the union of the opposites like has said it the philosopher Heraclitus, but it is about the reliability of the structure of the society or the world, so i think that you can not just say that the road can go up and down, since you have to also to seek to make the structure of the society or the world reliable , so it is what is doing my new model of my philosophy, i mean that we can say with too much abstraction that the below rule of my model of my philosophy is what we call the engine of egoism, but i think we have not to be pessimistic, since my new model of my philosophy shows that there is a balance between in one side the fact the vast majority of humans are not extremists or/and violent and in the other side my rule below that says that the vast majority of humans demand high quality even if they are not of high quality, since they want to be "happy", and this demanding high quality of most humans is "a strong need" , so it is a "pressure" that pushes us to be of higher and higher quality, so you are understanding from my new model of my philosophy that we can not just look at the engine of egoism and be pessimistic, or we can not just look in philosophy at the lack of meaning of human life and be pessimistic, so i invite you to read my below thoughts of my philosophy so that to understand my views: I have just looked at the following video about Buddhism: Buddhist Emptiness Explained https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcc_qdzpeDY So my new philosophy and model of my philosophy is different, since what i mean is that lack of meaning of human life is not so problematic, since there is only a tiny minority of extremists and violent, and since the vast majority of humans are not violent, so what my model of my philosophy says, it is that it becomes easy to make humans attractive , since the vast majority of humans are not violent , so we have to make humans more smart by making them well educated so that they be attractive so that for example they be able to love each others and so that they love to marry between them and so that they make enough babies , and of course you have to know how to "guide" people so that they be well educated so that they not lose there way, so then the very important thing is to show the good way of being well educated, also my new model is showing and talking about an important rule that is the following: The vast majority of humans demand high quality even if they are not of high quality, since they want to be "happy", and this demanding high quality of most humans is "a strong need" , so it is a "pressure" that pushes us to be of higher and higher quality. Also notice that this important rule has the tendency to pushes you to be well educated, and when you become well educated, the above rule is applied again to enhance the standards even more and more. But i repeat it, that you have to know how to "guide" people so that they be well educated so that they not lose |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
