Thursday, July 27, 2023

Digest for comp.programming.threads@googlegroups.com - 3 updates in 3 topics

Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jul 26 04:35PM -0700

Hello,
 
 
More of my philosophy about the definition of Pos and about IQ and about Ultra-processed foods and about self-interest and about the GDP per capita and about philosopher Heraclitus and about my philosophy and about stupidity and about history and about the more understanding of my model and about philosophy and about extremism and violence and about arabs in France and about how most people of the society are not violent and about my programs and about the Ansistring and about ascii characters and about my kind of personality and about my way of thinking and about the exponential progress of our humanity and about my new proverbs and about mathematics and about performance and reliability and about fluid intelligence and about Leadership and about efficiency and about reliability and about the digital identity and about personality and about vitamin C and about indians and about arabs and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
 
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
 
Here is the definition of Pos() for the PosN() implementation below:
 
https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/delphi-in-a/1565926595/re230.html
 
 
But there is still a problem, since the new documentation from Delphi
is not showing that the Pos() function is overloaded so that it be compatible
with the above definition of previous Delphi versions, so here it is and look at it carefully:
 
https://docwiki.embarcadero.com/Libraries/Alexandria/en/System.Pos
 
 
But the definition of StrPos() is correct here:
 
https://docwiki.embarcadero.com/Libraries/Alexandria/en/System.SysUtils.StrPos
 
So reread my previous thoughts:
 
So I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i have
just looked at the following implementation of PosN() and i invite you to look carefully at it here:
 
https://www.swissdelphicenter.com/en/showcode.php?id=738
 
 
So it is like an IQ test, so i am discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence in the above implementation of PosN(), and it is that its time complexity is not good at all, since it is recursively copying the parts of the string with Copy() function , so it is too expensive, so the problem is that it is a higher level way of doing it, so i think that so that to solve the problem, you have to go inside the Pos() function and implement it differently or you can use the following way that solves it by using a PChar that uses pointers:
 
--
function StrPosStart(Str, SubStr : string; Start : integer) : integer;
{returns the found position of a substring from an initial starting position}
var
PtrStart, PtrFound : PChar;
begin
if Start > (Length(Str) - Length(SubStr) + 1) then begin
Result := 0;
Exit
end;
PtrStart := PChar(Str);
inc(PtrStart, Start - 1);
PtrFound := StrPos(PtrStart, PChar(SubStr));
if PtrFound <> nil then
Result := PtrFound - PChar(Str) + 1
else
Result := 0;
end;
--
 
And here is the definition of both Pos() and StrPos():
 
https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/delphi-in-a/1565926595/re230.html
 
https://docwiki.embarcadero.com/Libraries/Alexandria/en/System.SysUtils.StrPos
 
I invite you to read the following new interesting article:
 
Ultra-processed foods largely missing from US food policy
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/07/230720124604.htm
 
 
And Ultra-processed foods may be linked to increased risk of cancer
 
"For every 10 per cent increase in ultra-processed food in a person's diet, there was an increased incidence of 2 per cent for cancer overall, and a 19 per cent increase for ovarian cancer specifically.
 
Each 10 per cent increase in ultra-processed food consumption was also associated with increased mortality for cancer overall by 6 per cent, alongside a 16 per cent increase for breast cancer and a 30 per cent increase for ovarian cancer."
 
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/01/230131183131.htm
 
 
And you can read my thoughts in the following web link about cancer and about new interesting medical treatments and drugs:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/3HwdSeO3esc
 
 
So i have just looked at the following video of president Putin, and i invite you to look at it:
 
Exclusive: Full Interview With Russian President Vladimir Putin
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6pJd6O_NT0
 
 
So i think i am also a new philosopher, and i am discovering an important pattern with my fluid intelligence in the above video, so i think that the journalist that is doing the interview is naive in philosophy, since president Putin has also self-interest(s) that can go against the interest of USA or
against the interest of European Union or such, so for example president Putin has an interest in Syria and you have to think about it carefully so that to understand what kind of interest is it, so the above journalist is not smart, since he has to ask a smart question of: In for example the private sector in capitalism, self-interest is most of time regulated by "competition" so that to not lead to corruption, so you have to be smart and not ask stupid questions to president Putin, since if you want justice, you have to ask if there is mechanism(s) that bring justice, like by logical analogy in capitalism with competition that most of time regulates self-interest so that to not lead to corruption, so you have to ask the question of if self-interest has to have democratic principles and/or competition or such, so that it be regulated correctly.
 
So i think that looking at the GDP per capita of african countries is not
a good indicator of what looks like the conditions of living, since the GDP per capita can be increased much more by increasing much more productivity, and so that to increase much more productivity and quality, you have to specialize in what you do better and you have to use automation and technology so that to increase much more productivity and quality, but i think that african countries are not so bad, since there is specialization in what you do better in Africa and Africa can import technologies or robots so that it optimize much more , so then i think that we have not to be pessimistic about Africa since it will rapidly increase much more the GDP per capita, but of course African countries have to diversify more there economies so that they make there economies resilient, and they have to
make the private sector the powerful motor of the economy since it is
good for the economy and it also lower much more corruption, and i think that implementing democratic principles is an easy thing to do, so i think we have to be optimistic about Africa, and about implementing the modern way of the modern monetarist school of economics of Milton Friedman, you can read more about my thoughts about productivity and capitalism and more in the following web link:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/KN4V-rGRDdU
 
 
I have just looked at the following video about the philosopher Heraclitus and i invite you to look at it:
 
Heraclitus: Union of opposites, change & logos
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QzpXFyYOLIU
 
 
So i think i am a new philosopher, and i think the above philosopher that
we call Heraclitus talks about the Union of opposites..., but i think that
my philosophy is different, since i think the problematic is not just the union
of the opposites like has said it the philosopher Heraclitus, but it is about the reliability of the structure of the society or the world, so i think that you can not just say that the road can go up and down, since you have to also to seek to make the structure of the society or the world reliable , so it is what is doing my new model of my philosophy, i mean that we can say with too much abstraction that the below rule of my model of my philosophy is what we call the engine of egoism, but i think we have not to be pessimistic, since my new model of my philosophy shows that there is a balance between in one side the fact the vast majority of humans are not extremists or/and violent and in the other side my rule below that says that the vast majority of humans demand high quality even if they are not of high quality, since they want to be "happy", and this demanding high quality of most humans is "a strong need" , so it is a "pressure" that pushes us to be of higher and higher quality, so you are understanding from my new model of my philosophy that we can not just look at the engine of egoism and be pessimistic, or we can not just look in philosophy at the lack of meaning of human life and be pessimistic, so i invite you to read my below thoughts of my philosophy so that to understand my views:
 
 
I have just looked at the following video about Buddhism:
 
Buddhist Emptiness Explained
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcc_qdzpeDY
 
 
So my new philosophy and model of my philosophy is different,
since what i mean is that lack of meaning of human life is not
so problematic, since there is only a tiny minority of extremists
and violent, and since the vast majority of humans are not violent,
so what my model of my philosophy says, it is that it becomes easy to
make humans attractive , since the vast majority of humans are not violent , so we have to make humans more smart by making them well educated so that they be attractive so that for example they be able to love each others and so that they love to marry between them and so that they make enough babies , and of course you have to know how to "guide" people so that they be well educated so that they not lose there way, so then the very important thing is to show the good way of being well educated, also my new model is
showing and talking about an important rule that is the following:
 
The vast majority of humans demand high quality even if they are not of high quality, since they want to be "happy", and this demanding high quality of most humans is "a strong need" , so it is a "pressure" that pushes us to be of higher and higher quality.
 
Also notice that this important rule has the tendency to pushes you to be
well educated, and when you become well educated, the above rule is applied again to enhance the standards even more and more. But i repeat it, that you have to know how to "guide" people so that they be well educated so that they not lose there way, so then the very important thing is to show the good way of being well educated. So i invite you to read about my philosophy in my below previous thoughts so that you understand my views:
 
So i think one of the most important thing in philosophy is how to avoid "stupidity" by doing good philosophy, so we can ask the philosophical question of:
 
What is good philosophy ?
 
So i think i am also a new philosopher, and you can read about my new ideas of my philosophy below and in the below web links, but i think the good philosophy is also about how to approximate well by discovering what is
really the main problem or problems in philosophy, but so that to know about
them, you have to do good philosophy, i mean that for example my new
model below of philosophy is that the main problem is not performance
, and it is not violence, but it is reliability of the exponential progress of our humanity, also i am saying that we have not to waste our time with
racial nationalism and ethnical nationalism, and also i am showing
an important rule that is an engine by saying the following:
 
The vast majority of humans demand high quality even if they are not of high quality, since they want to be "happy", and this demanding high quality of most humans is "a strong need" , so it is a "pressure" that pushes us to be of higher and higher quality.
 
 
So if you think that it is survival, it is not survival, since survival is
just about the staying alive, so it is not the engine of the rule above that
i am talking about, so if you say that the above rule is the engine of egoism
like has said it the philosopher and economist Adam Smith, so i will
say that saying that the above rule is the engine of egoism is too much abstraction that doesn't show clearly and make you understand the rule, and of course you have to understand that in my new model there still a problem, and it is that you have to know how to "guide" people so that they be well educated so that they not lose there way, so then the very important thing
is to show the good way of being well educated. So i invite you to read my
below previous thoughts so that you understand my views:
 
So from my new model , i can for example say that past history of Slavery has been caused by a tiny minority and it has nothing to do with the vast majority of white people , so it is the same for nazism or neo-nazism or white supremacism, since they are only a tiny minority that is extremism of neo-nazism or white supremacism, so it is not representative of the vast majority of white europeans that have nothing to do with this violence and extremism, and i think that Nazism has been caused by many factors, like by the factor of the first world war and by the propaganda of a tiny minority of Nazis that has wanted to make believe that the jews are evil, and there is also some other factors, so then as i am saying below, you have to know how to manage the tiny minority of extremists and violent.
 
So i have to explain more the ideas of my new model, so i have just
said the following:
 
The vast majority of humans demand high quality even if they are not of high quality, since they want to be "happy", and this demanding high quality of most humans is "a strong need" , so it is a "pressure" that pushes us to be of higher and higher quality.
 
So i think that the above rule regulates violence and extremism too, and you are also noticing that i am also saying in my below ideas of my model that the the vast majority of humans are not violent, and i am also giving some statistics of it, so i think that the ideas of my new model are clear, since i think that violence is not the problem in philosophy, other than that, i think that the above rule pushes us to be of higher and higher quality, so it pushes us to be well educated, and from the being well educated we also get the rest, so i think that we have to be optimistic about it. Other than that i invite you to read my below thoughts of my model so that you understand it
correctly:
 
I have just said the following:
 
"So i think we have before to empirically verify the ideas so that to be efficient, so for example you are noticing that there was really few extremism and violence, even in USA, from maghrebians or arabs after the 9/11, or there was no extremism or violence in USA from palestinians like
Hamas or the like in reaction to what is happening between Israel and Palestinians, so you have to be logical, since when you look at how much it is a tiny minority of extremists and violent , you will logically infer that as i am saying below that the vast majority of the people of the society of a country are not violent or agressive, since also the vast majority of people of a society of a country are not genetically agressive or violent."
 
And i have also just said the following:
 
"So i think we have to be careful, since we have before to verify empirically the ideas , so i think we can not say that lack of meaning in human life causes that the society of a country becomes violent or agressive, since i think that the vast majority of the people of the society of a country are not violent or agressive, since also the vast majority of people of a society of a country are not genetically agressive or violent, so i think it is the same for arabs or maghrebians, so then i think that what we have just seen in France as violence and destruction in a reaction to the death of the maghrebian called
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jul 26 03:09PM -0700

Hello,
 
 
More of my philosophy about IQ and about Ultra-processed foods and about self-interest and about the GDP per capita and about philosopher Heraclitus and about my philosophy and about stupidity and about history and about the more understanding of my model and about philosophy and about extremism and violence and about arabs in France and about how most people of the society are not violent and about my programs and about the Ansistring and about ascii characters and about my kind of personality and about my way of thinking and about the exponential progress of our humanity and about my new proverbs and about mathematics and about performance and reliability and about fluid intelligence and about Leadership and about efficiency and about reliability and about the digital identity and about personality and about vitamin C and about indians and about arabs and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
 
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
 
So I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i have
just looked at the following implementation of PosN() and i invite you to look carefully at it here:
 
https://www.swissdelphicenter.com/en/showcode.php?id=738
 
 
So it is like an IQ test, so i am discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence in the above implementation of PosN(), and it is that its time complexity is not good at all, since it is recursively copying the parts of the string with Copy() function , so it is too expensive, so the problem is that it is a higher level way of doing it, so i think that so that to solve the problem, you have to go inside the Pos() function and implement it differently or you can use the following way that solves it by using a PChar that uses pointers:
 
--
function StrPosStart(Str, SubStr : string; Start : integer) : integer;
{returns the found position of a substring from an initial starting position}
var
PtrStart, PtrFound : PChar;
begin
if Start > (Length(Str) - Length(SubStr) + 1) then begin
Result := 0;
Exit
end;
PtrStart := PChar(Str);
inc(PtrStart, Start - 1);
PtrFound := StrPos(PtrStart, PChar(SubStr));
if PtrFound <> nil then
Result := PtrFound - PChar(Str) + 1
else
Result := 0;
end;
--
 
And here is the definition of both Pos() and StrPos():
 
https://docwiki.embarcadero.com/Libraries/Alexandria/en/System.Pos
 
https://docwiki.embarcadero.com/Libraries/Alexandria/en/System.SysUtils.StrPos
 
I invite you to read the following new interesting article:
 
Ultra-processed foods largely missing from US food policy
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/07/230720124604.htm
 
 
And Ultra-processed foods may be linked to increased risk of cancer
 
"For every 10 per cent increase in ultra-processed food in a person's diet, there was an increased incidence of 2 per cent for cancer overall, and a 19 per cent increase for ovarian cancer specifically.
 
Each 10 per cent increase in ultra-processed food consumption was also associated with increased mortality for cancer overall by 6 per cent, alongside a 16 per cent increase for breast cancer and a 30 per cent increase for ovarian cancer."
 
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/01/230131183131.htm
 
 
And you can read my thoughts in the following web link about cancer and about new interesting medical treatments and drugs:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/3HwdSeO3esc
 
 
So i have just looked at the following video of president Putin, and i invite you to look at it:
 
Exclusive: Full Interview With Russian President Vladimir Putin
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6pJd6O_NT0
 
 
So i think i am also a new philosopher, and i am discovering an important pattern with my fluid intelligence in the above video, so i think that the journalist that is doing the interview is naive in philosophy, since president Putin has also self-interest(s) that can go against the interest of USA or
against the interest of European Union or such, so for example president Putin has an interest in Syria and you have to think about it carefully so that to understand what kind of interest is it, so the above journalist is not smart, since he has to ask a smart question of: In for example the private sector in capitalism, self-interest is most of time regulated by "competition" so that to not lead to corruption, so you have to be smart and not ask stupid questions to president Putin, since if you want justice, you have to ask if there is mechanism(s) that bring justice, like by logical analogy in capitalism with competition that most of time regulates self-interest so that to not lead to corruption, so you have to ask the question of if self-interest has to have democratic principles and/or competition or such, so that it be regulated correctly.
 
So i think that looking at the GDP per capita of african countries is not
a good indicator of what looks like the conditions of living, since the GDP per capita can be increased much more by increasing much more productivity, and so that to increase much more productivity and quality, you have to specialize in what you do better and you have to use automation and technology so that to increase much more productivity and quality, but i think that african countries are not so bad, since there is specialization in what you do better in Africa and Africa can import technologies or robots so that it optimize much more , so then i think that we have not to be pessimistic about Africa since it will rapidly increase much more the GDP per capita, but of course African countries have to diversify more there economies so that they make there economies resilient, and they have to
make the private sector the powerful motor of the economy since it is
good for the economy and it also lower much more corruption, and i think that implementing democratic principles is an easy thing to do, so i think we have to be optimistic about Africa, and about implementing the modern way of the modern monetarist school of economics of Milton Friedman, you can read more about my thoughts about productivity and capitalism and more in the following web link:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/KN4V-rGRDdU
 
 
I have just looked at the following video about the philosopher Heraclitus and i invite you to look at it:
 
Heraclitus: Union of opposites, change & logos
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QzpXFyYOLIU
 
 
So i think i am a new philosopher, and i think the above philosopher that
we call Heraclitus talks about the Union of opposites..., but i think that
my philosophy is different, since i think the problematic is not just the union
of the opposites like has said it the philosopher Heraclitus, but it is about the reliability of the structure of the society or the world, so i think that you can not just say that the road can go up and down, since you have to also to seek to make the structure of the society or the world reliable , so it is what is doing my new model of my philosophy, i mean that we can say with too much abstraction that the below rule of my model of my philosophy is what we call the engine of egoism, but i think we have not to be pessimistic, since my new model of my philosophy shows that there is a balance between in one side the fact the vast majority of humans are not extremists or/and violent and in the other side my rule below that says that the vast majority of humans demand high quality even if they are not of high quality, since they want to be "happy", and this demanding high quality of most humans is "a strong need" , so it is a "pressure" that pushes us to be of higher and higher quality, so you are understanding from my new model of my philosophy that we can not just look at the engine of egoism and be pessimistic, or we can not just look in philosophy at the lack of meaning of human life and be pessimistic, so i invite you to read my below thoughts of my philosophy so that to understand my views:
 
 
I have just looked at the following video about Buddhism:
 
Buddhist Emptiness Explained
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcc_qdzpeDY
 
 
So my new philosophy and model of my philosophy is different,
since what i mean is that lack of meaning of human life is not
so problematic, since there is only a tiny minority of extremists
and violent, and since the vast majority of humans are not violent,
so what my model of my philosophy says, it is that it becomes easy to
make humans attractive , since the vast majority of humans are not violent , so we have to make humans more smart by making them well educated so that they be attractive so that for example they be able to love each others and so that they love to marry between them and so that they make enough babies , and of course you have to know how to "guide" people so that they be well educated so that they not lose there way, so then the very important thing is to show the good way of being well educated, also my new model is
showing and talking about an important rule that is the following:
 
The vast majority of humans demand high quality even if they are not of high quality, since they want to be "happy", and this demanding high quality of most humans is "a strong need" , so it is a "pressure" that pushes us to be of higher and higher quality.
 
Also notice that this important rule has the tendency to pushes you to be
well educated, and when you become well educated, the above rule is applied again to enhance the standards even more and more. But i repeat it, that you have to know how to "guide" people so that they be well educated so that they not lose there way, so then the very important thing is to show the good way of being well educated. So i invite you to read about my philosophy in my below previous thoughts so that you understand my views:
 
So i think one of the most important thing in philosophy is how to avoid "stupidity" by doing good philosophy, so we can ask the philosophical question of:
 
What is good philosophy ?
 
So i think i am also a new philosopher, and you can read about my new ideas of my philosophy below and in the below web links, but i think the good philosophy is also about how to approximate well by discovering what is
really the main problem or problems in philosophy, but so that to know about
them, you have to do good philosophy, i mean that for example my new
model below of philosophy is that the main problem is not performance
, and it is not violence, but it is reliability of the exponential progress of our humanity, also i am saying that we have not to waste our time with
racial nationalism and ethnical nationalism, and also i am showing
an important rule that is an engine by saying the following:
 
The vast majority of humans demand high quality even if they are not of high quality, since they want to be "happy", and this demanding high quality of most humans is "a strong need" , so it is a "pressure" that pushes us to be of higher and higher quality.
 
 
So if you think that it is survival, it is not survival, since survival is
just about the staying alive, so it is not the engine of the rule above that
i am talking about, so if you say that the above rule is the engine of egoism
like has said it the philosopher and economist Adam Smith, so i will
say that saying that the above rule is the engine of egoism is too much abstraction that doesn't show clearly and make you understand the rule, and of course you have to understand that in my new model there still a problem, and it is that you have to know how to "guide" people so that they be well educated so that they not lose there way, so then the very important thing
is to show the good way of being well educated. So i invite you to read my
below previous thoughts so that you understand my views:
 
So from my new model , i can for example say that past history of Slavery has been caused by a tiny minority and it has nothing to do with the vast majority of white people , so it is the same for nazism or neo-nazism or white supremacism, since they are only a tiny minority that is extremism of neo-nazism or white supremacism, so it is not representative of the vast majority of white europeans that have nothing to do with this violence and extremism, and i think that Nazism has been caused by many factors, like by the factor of the first world war and by the propaganda of a tiny minority of Nazis that has wanted to make believe that the jews are evil, and there is also some other factors, so then as i am saying below, you have to know how to manage the tiny minority of extremists and violent.
 
So i have to explain more the ideas of my new model, so i have just
said the following:
 
The vast majority of humans demand high quality even if they are not of high quality, since they want to be "happy", and this demanding high quality of most humans is "a strong need" , so it is a "pressure" that pushes us to be of higher and higher quality.
 
So i think that the above rule regulates violence and extremism too, and you are also noticing that i am also saying in my below ideas of my model that the the vast majority of humans are not violent, and i am also giving some statistics of it, so i think that the ideas of my new model are clear, since i think that violence is not the problem in philosophy, other than that, i think that the above rule pushes us to be of higher and higher quality, so it pushes us to be well educated, and from the being well educated we also get the rest, so i think that we have to be optimistic about it. Other than that i invite you to read my below thoughts of my model so that you understand it
correctly:
 
I have just said the following:
 
"So i think we have before to empirically verify the ideas so that to be efficient, so for example you are noticing that there was really few extremism and violence, even in USA, from maghrebians or arabs after the 9/11, or there was no extremism or violence in USA from palestinians like
Hamas or the like in reaction to what is happening between Israel and Palestinians, so you have to be logical, since when you look at how much it is a tiny minority of extremists and violent , you will logically infer that as i am saying below that the vast majority of the people of the society of a country are not violent or agressive, since also the vast majority of people of a society of a country are not genetically agressive or violent."
 
And i have also just said the following:
 
"So i think we have to be careful, since we have before to verify empirically the ideas , so i think we can not say that lack of meaning in human life causes that the society of a country becomes violent or agressive, since i think that the vast majority of the people of the society of a country are not violent or agressive, since also the vast majority of people of a society of a country are not genetically agressive or violent, so i think it is the same for arabs or maghrebians, so then i think that what we have just seen in France as violence and destruction in a reaction to the death of the maghrebian called Nahel is just the actions of a tiny minority that is not representative of what are arabs or maghrebians, so i think we have to be optimistic."
 
And for more logical proof with statistics of what i am saying above, i invite you to look at the following video where it says that there is only a "tiny" minority in the USA Army that is extremist:
 
American Terror: The Military's Problem With Extremism in the Ranks
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVkBVExuXSQ
 
 
So i also think that i am a new philosopher, and i think that the problem in philosophy is not violence as i am explaining it, but you have of course to know how to
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jul 26 08:55AM -0700

Hello,
 
 
More of my philosophy about Ultra-processed foods and about self-interest and about the GDP per capita and about philosopher Heraclitus and about my philosophy and about stupidity and about history and about the more understanding of my model and about philosophy and about extremism and violence and about arabs in France and about how most people of the society are not violent and about my programs and about the Ansistring and about ascii characters and about my kind of personality and about my way of thinking and about the exponential progress of our humanity and about my new proverbs and about mathematics and about performance and reliability and about fluid intelligence and about Leadership and about efficiency and about reliability and about the digital identity and about personality and about vitamin C and about indians and about arabs and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
 
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
 
I invite you to read the following new interesting article:
 
Ultra-processed foods largely missing from US food policy
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/07/230720124604.htm
 
 
And Ultra-processed foods may be linked to increased risk of cancer
 
"For every 10 per cent increase in ultra-processed food in a person's diet, there was an increased incidence of 2 per cent for cancer overall, and a 19 per cent increase for ovarian cancer specifically.
 
Each 10 per cent increase in ultra-processed food consumption was also associated with increased mortality for cancer overall by 6 per cent, alongside a 16 per cent increase for breast cancer and a 30 per cent increase for ovarian cancer."
 
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/01/230131183131.htm
 
 
And you can read my thoughts in the following web link about cancer and about new interesting medical treatments and drugs:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/3HwdSeO3esc
 
 
So i have just looked at the following video of president Putin, and i invite you to look at it:
 
Exclusive: Full Interview With Russian President Vladimir Putin
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6pJd6O_NT0
 
 
So i think i am also a new philosopher, and i am discovering an important pattern with my fluid intelligence in the above video, so i think that the journalist that is doing the interview is naive in philosophy, since president Putin has also self-interest(s) that can go against the interest of USA or
against the interest of European Union or such, so for example president Putin has an interest in Syria and you have to think about it carefully so that to understand what kind of interest is it, so the above journalist is not smart, since he has to ask a smart question of: In for example the private sector in capitalism, self-interest is most of time regulated by "competition" so that to not lead to corruption, so you have to be smart and not ask stupid questions to president Putin, since if you want justice, you have to ask if there is mechanism(s) that bring justice, like by logical analogy in capitalism with competition that most of time regulates self-interest so that to not lead to corruption, so you have to ask the question of if self-interest has to have democratic principles and/or competition or such, so that it be regulated correctly.
 
So i think that looking at the GDP per capita of african countries is not
a good indicator of what looks like the conditions of living, since the GDP per capita can be increased much more by increasing much more productivity, and so that to increase much more productivity and quality, you have to specialize in what you do better and you have to use automation and technology so that to increase much more productivity and quality, but i think that african countries are not so bad, since there is specialization in what you do better in Africa and Africa can import technologies or robots so that it optimize much more , so then i think that we have not to be pessimistic about Africa since it will rapidly increase much more the GDP per capita, but of course African countries have to diversify more there economies so that they make there economies resilient, and they have to
make the private sector the powerful motor of the economy since it is
good for the economy and it also lower much more corruption, and i think that implementing democratic principles is an easy thing to do, so i think we have to be optimistic about Africa, and about implementing the modern way of the modern monetarist school of economics of Milton Friedman, you can read more about my thoughts about productivity and capitalism and more in the following web link:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/KN4V-rGRDdU
 
 
I have just looked at the following video about the philosopher Heraclitus and i invite you to look at it:
 
Heraclitus: Union of opposites, change & logos
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QzpXFyYOLIU
 
 
So i think i am a new philosopher, and i think the above philosopher that
we call Heraclitus talks about the Union of opposites..., but i think that
my philosophy is different, since i think the problematic is not just the union
of the opposites like has said it the philosopher Heraclitus, but it is about the reliability of the structure of the society or the world, so i think that you can not just say that the road can go up and down, since you have to also to seek to make the structure of the society or the world reliable , so it is what is doing my new model of my philosophy, i mean that we can say with too much abstraction that the below rule of my model of my philosophy is what we call the engine of egoism, but i think we have not to be pessimistic, since my new model of my philosophy shows that there is a balance between in one side the fact the vast majority of humans are not extremists or/and violent and in the other side my rule below that says that the vast majority of humans demand high quality even if they are not of high quality, since they want to be "happy", and this demanding high quality of most humans is "a strong need" , so it is a "pressure" that pushes us to be of higher and higher quality, so you are understanding from my new model of my philosophy that we can not just look at the engine of egoism and be pessimistic, or we can not just look in philosophy at the lack of meaning of human life and be pessimistic, so i invite you to read my below thoughts of my philosophy so that to understand my views:
 
 
I have just looked at the following video about Buddhism:
 
Buddhist Emptiness Explained
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcc_qdzpeDY
 
 
So my new philosophy and model of my philosophy is different,
since what i mean is that lack of meaning of human life is not
so problematic, since there is only a tiny minority of extremists
and violent, and since the vast majority of humans are not violent,
so what my model of my philosophy says, it is that it becomes easy to
make humans attractive , since the vast majority of humans are not violent , so we have to make humans more smart by making them well educated so that they be attractive so that for example they be able to love each others and so that they love to marry between them and so that they make enough babies , and of course you have to know how to "guide" people so that they be well educated so that they not lose there way, so then the very important thing is to show the good way of being well educated, also my new model is
showing and talking about an important rule that is the following:
 
The vast majority of humans demand high quality even if they are not of high quality, since they want to be "happy", and this demanding high quality of most humans is "a strong need" , so it is a "pressure" that pushes us to be of higher and higher quality.
 
Also notice that this important rule has the tendency to pushes you to be
well educated, and when you become well educated, the above rule is applied again to enhance the standards even more and more. But i repeat it, that you have to know how to "guide" people so that they be well educated so that they not lose there way, so then the very important thing is to show the good way of being well educated. So i invite you to read about my philosophy in my below previous thoughts so that you understand my views:
 
So i think one of the most important thing in philosophy is how to avoid "stupidity" by doing good philosophy, so we can ask the philosophical question of:
 
What is good philosophy ?
 
So i think i am also a new philosopher, and you can read about my new ideas of my philosophy below and in the below web links, but i think the good philosophy is also about how to approximate well by discovering what is
really the main problem or problems in philosophy, but so that to know about
them, you have to do good philosophy, i mean that for example my new
model below of philosophy is that the main problem is not performance
, and it is not violence, but it is reliability of the exponential progress of our humanity, also i am saying that we have not to waste our time with
racial nationalism and ethnical nationalism, and also i am showing
an important rule that is an engine by saying the following:
 
The vast majority of humans demand high quality even if they are not of high quality, since they want to be "happy", and this demanding high quality of most humans is "a strong need" , so it is a "pressure" that pushes us to be of higher and higher quality.
 
 
So if you think that it is survival, it is not survival, since survival is
just about the staying alive, so it is not the engine of the rule above that
i am talking about, so if you say that the above rule is the engine of egoism
like has said it the philosopher and economist Adam Smith, so i will
say that saying that the above rule is the engine of egoism is too much abstraction that doesn't show clearly and make you understand the rule, and of course you have to understand that in my new model there still a problem, and it is that you have to know how to "guide" people so that they be well educated so that they not lose there way, so then the very important thing
is to show the good way of being well educated. So i invite you to read my
below previous thoughts so that you understand my views:
 
So from my new model , i can for example say that past history of Slavery has been caused by a tiny minority and it has nothing to do with the vast majority of white people , so it is the same for nazism or neo-nazism or white supremacism, since they are only a tiny minority that is extremism of neo-nazism or white supremacism, so it is not representative of the vast majority of white europeans that have nothing to do with this violence and extremism, and i think that Nazism has been caused by many factors, like by the factor of the first world war and by the propaganda of a tiny minority of Nazis that has wanted to make believe that the jews are evil, and there is also some other factors, so then as i am saying below, you have to know how to manage the tiny minority of extremists and violent.
 
So i have to explain more the ideas of my new model, so i have just
said the following:
 
The vast majority of humans demand high quality even if they are not of high quality, since they want to be "happy", and this demanding high quality of most humans is "a strong need" , so it is a "pressure" that pushes us to be of higher and higher quality.
 
So i think that the above rule regulates violence and extremism too, and you are also noticing that i am also saying in my below ideas of my model that the the vast majority of humans are not violent, and i am also giving some statistics of it, so i think that the ideas of my new model are clear, since i think that violence is not the problem in philosophy, other than that, i think that the above rule pushes us to be of higher and higher quality, so it pushes us to be well educated, and from the being well educated we also get the rest, so i think that we have to be optimistic about it. Other than that i invite you to read my below thoughts of my model so that you understand it
correctly:
 
I have just said the following:
 
"So i think we have before to empirically verify the ideas so that to be efficient, so for example you are noticing that there was really few extremism and violence, even in USA, from maghrebians or arabs after the 9/11, or there was no extremism or violence in USA from palestinians like
Hamas or the like in reaction to what is happening between Israel and Palestinians, so you have to be logical, since when you look at how much it is a tiny minority of extremists and violent , you will logically infer that as i am saying below that the vast majority of the people of the society of a country are not violent or agressive, since also the vast majority of people of a society of a country are not genetically agressive or violent."
 
And i have also just said the following:
 
"So i think we have to be careful, since we have before to verify empirically the ideas , so i think we can not say that lack of meaning in human life causes that the society of a country becomes violent or agressive, since i think that the vast majority of the people of the society of a country are not violent or agressive, since also the vast majority of people of a society of a country are not genetically agressive or violent, so i think it is the same for arabs or maghrebians, so then i think that what we have just seen in France as violence and destruction in a reaction to the death of the maghrebian called Nahel is just the actions of a tiny minority that is not representative of what are arabs or maghrebians, so i think we have to be optimistic."
 
And for more logical proof with statistics of what i am saying above, i invite you to look at the following video where it says that there is only a "tiny" minority in the USA Army that is extremist:
 
American Terror: The Military's Problem With Extremism in the Ranks
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVkBVExuXSQ
 
 
So i also think that i am a new philosopher, and i think that the problem in philosophy is not violence as i am explaining it, but you have of course to know how to manage correctly the tiny minority of violent or criminals, so i think since in philosophy violence is not really the problem, so there remain that you have to know how to make people more smart by making them well educated so that they be able to love each others and so that they love to marry between them and so that they make enough babies , so as you notice that i am saying that the lack of meaning of human life is not really so problematic, other than that, i have just said the following important things and i invite you to read them carefully (and i have just corrected a minor mistake in my thoughts below):
 
So i have to explain my way of thinking so that you understand me more,
so my way of thinking is that we have to evolve our way of thinking, since we are progressing in an exponential way , so we will be really powerful in the near future, so we have not to waste our time with racial nationalism or ethnical nationalism, since we are going to be able to enhance our genetics in the near future, so genetics is not the problem, and of course in science there is only one human race that we call humans, so the most important thing is how to manage correctly the exponential progress of our humanity, so it is about reliability, but i think that performance is not the problem, it is reliability that is the problem, so we have to ensure that we well manage this exponential progress of our humanity, and i think it is the most important thing to do. And so that to know about this exponential progress of our humanity, i invite you to look at the following important
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)