- Thread-safe initialization of static objects - 8 Updates
| scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal): Sep 27 10:37PM >I need to examine the kernel for nt4 again: >https://github.com/ZoloZiak/WinNT4/tree/master/private/ntos Why? It's a quarter century old. Did it even support threads? |
| "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>: Sep 27 03:49PM -0700 On 9/27/2023 3:37 PM, Scott Lurndal wrote: >> I need to examine the kernel for nt4 again: >> https://github.com/ZoloZiak/WinNT4/tree/master/private/ntos > Why? It's a quarter century old. Did it even support threads? NT 4? Yup, it supported threads. |
| "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>: Sep 27 03:56PM -0700 On 9/27/2023 3:25 PM, Michael S wrote: >> I cannot remember kernel keyed events were implemented in win7, I am >> pretty sure they were. Have you ever messed around with those before? > I have no idea what the phrase "kernel keyed events" means. There is a sync object in windows called a keyed event, however I think its only for the kernel. Iirc, I learned about it in a sysinternals magazine. Forgot the issue number. It is a special type of Windows Event object. |
| "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>: Sep 27 03:57PM -0700 On 9/27/2023 3:27 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote: >> Ws2016, so I expect the same behavior with very high certainty. > Could this in any way be related to Microsoft evidently obtaining a patent on > futexes in 2014? NO SHIT!!! ;^o wow.! |
| Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com>: Sep 27 03:59PM -0700 On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 1:37:48 AM UTC+3, Scott Lurndal wrote: > >I need to examine the kernel for nt4 again: > >https://github.com/ZoloZiak/WinNT4/tree/master/private/ntos > Why? It's a quarter century old. Did it even support threads? Windows Nt supports threads since its very first version, non-intuitively named 3.1. I.e. 30 years. |
| "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>: Sep 27 04:06PM -0700 On 9/27/2023 3:59 PM, Michael S wrote: >>> https://github.com/ZoloZiak/WinNT4/tree/master/private/ntos >> Why? It's a quarter century old. Did it even support threads? > Windows Nt supports threads since its very first version, Yup. You are correct. Windows NT 4 even had IOCP. |
| Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com>: Sep 27 04:10PM -0700 On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 2:06:33 AM UTC+3, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > >> Why? It's a quarter century old. Did it even support threads? > > Windows Nt supports threads since its very first version, > Yup. You are correct. Windows NT 4 even had IOCP. Didn't IOCP come earlier? Nt 3.5? |
| "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>: Sep 27 04:15PM -0700 On 9/27/2023 4:10 PM, Michael S wrote: >>> Windows Nt supports threads since its very first version, >> Yup. You are correct. Windows NT 4 even had IOCP. > Didn't IOCP come earlier? Nt 3.5? Good question. I cannot remember right now! I used it a lot in NT 4. Shit, your question kind of got me here. I cannot remember right now. Anyway, thanks for the brain sparks, Michael! |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment