- Is Microsoft Windows secretly downloading childporn to your computer ?! - 11 Updates
- My efficient Threadpool engine was updated to version 2.6 - 2 Updates
- cmsg cancel <n3nlhb$7uo$2@dont-email.me> - 2 Updates
- A "better" C++ - 2 Updates
- [ANN] U++ 2015.2 released (rev 9251) - 1 Update
- Little help with a Visual Studio linker error? - 5 Updates
| "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com>: Dec 02 01:22AM +0100 It's not YOU doing it. Since you obviously don't understand that it's not worth reading anything else you wrote LOL. Bye, Skybuck. |
| "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam>: Dec 01 04:44PM -0800 > It's not YOU doing it. > Since you obviously don't understand that it's not worth reading anything > else you wrote LOL. If this crap is really happening to you, take your harddrive out and burn it into fuc%ing dust! Do it NOW! |
| Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid>: Dec 02 08:54AM > You have no control over Windows 10 update. Just anything could/might happen. Like what? Microsoft stealing your credit card number? Don't make me laugh. --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net --- |
| Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid>: Dec 02 08:57AM > You download things FROM a computer, you upload them TO a computer. It's a matter of perspective. If a hacker breaks into your computer and starts a download from somewhere else into your computer, isn't the hacker "downloading" things to your computer? --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net --- |
| Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>: Dec 02 09:42AM On 02/12/15 08:57, Juha Nieminen wrote: > It's a matter of perspective. If a hacker breaks into your computer and > starts a download from somewhere else into your computer, isn't the hacker > "downloading" things to your computer? My understanding of the term has always been that you upload from a smaller device to a larger, and download from a larger device to a smaller. Thus, from your laptop you might *up*load data to a Web server or a mainframe, but you would *down*load data to your phone or tablet. If the devices are of comparable size and power, you aren't upping or downing anything - you're just transferring data from one computer to another. I suppose we could say "crossloading"? -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within |
| seeplus <gizmomaker@bigpond.com>: Dec 02 01:51AM -0800 On Wednesday, December 2, 2015 at 7:54:48 PM UTC+11, Juha Nieminen wrote: > Like what? Microsoft stealing your credit card number? > Don't make me laugh. > --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: XXXXXXXX --- If you are running W10 then you have AGREED in the T&Cs: "we will access, disclose and preserve personal data." .... and search "Microsoft hack".... growing exponentially. |
| Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com>: Dec 02 04:09AM -0600 Juha Nieminen wrote: > starts a download from somewhere else into your computer, isn't the hacker > "downloading" things to your computer? > --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net --- Down is towards an end node; up is towards the backbone. Servers live closer to the backbone. Usually. Or rather did when the nomenclature was forged. -- Les Cargill |
| Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid>: Dec 02 03:20PM > smaller device to a larger, and download from a larger device to a > smaller. Thus, from your laptop you might *up*load data to a Web server > or a mainframe, but you would *down*load data to your phone or tablet. That's sort of the usage I'm used to, but it probably has more to do with network topology than CPU power. Servers on the internet are at the top of the diagram, and embedded devices that can't access the internet directly are at the bottom with my PC somewhere in the middle. -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! Are you still an at ALCOHOLIC? gmail.com |
| Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid>: Dec 02 03:20PM > Down is towards an end node; up is towards the backbone. Servers live > closer to the backbone. Usually. Or rather did when the nomenclature > was forged. Exactly! Thats the usage I've been used to for the past 30 years. -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! I'm pretending that at we're all watching PHIL gmail.com SILVERS instead of RICARDO MONTALBAN! |
| Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org>: Dec 02 08:36AM -0800 > It's a matter of perspective. If a hacker breaks into your computer and > starts a download from somewhere else into your computer, isn't the hacker > "downloading" things to your computer? My understanding of the word "downloading" has always been STOP FEEDING THE TROLL! -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst> Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc. "We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this." -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister" |
| "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam>: Dec 02 02:08PM -0800 > "seeplus" wrote in message > news:85400d28-7c6d-497a-932d-b129b9a4a476@googlegroups.com... [...] > If you are running W10 then you have AGREED in the T&Cs: [...] When I first noticed that damn windows icon sitting in my taskbar I thought I had a virus. Turns out that its okay, and part of Microsoft trying to get me to download Win10. What a piece of shi% move on their part. As%holes! GRRRRR! ;^/ |
| Ramine <ramine@1.1>: Dec 02 03:55PM -0800 Hello... I have updated my efficient Threadpool engines with priorities and without priorities to version 2.6, i was thinking more and i have come with another more efficient and more scalable concurrent FIFO Queue, please look at it inside the zipfile, its name is FIFOQueue_mpmc.pas, i have also corrected some logic inside my algorithm of my Threadpool engines and now they are correct, i have tested them thoroughly and you can be confident because i think they are stable and fast now, so be happy with them. One last note: if you look at the microsoft TPL library it's using a Threadpool engine with many queues and i think it's work stealing with a round robin mechanism , but i think this is not good for critical systems if the number of queues are higher and higher... i have avoided this problem in my Threadpool engine. You can download my Threadpool engines with priorities and without priorities version 2.6 from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/threadpool-with-priorities and from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/threadpool Please feel freee to port them to the C++ programming language... Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Ramine <ramine@1.1>: Dec 02 04:25PM -0800 I wrote: > this is not good for critical systems if the number of queues > are higher and higher... i have avoided this problem in > my Threadpool engine. Please read this to understand more how works the Microsoft TPL "...Each worker thread has its own local task queue of work to be done. Each worker usually just pushes new tasks onto its own queue and pops work whenever a task is done. When its local queue is empty, a worker looks for work itself and tries to "steal" work from the queues of other workers." Read more here about Microsoft TPL: http://msdev.developer-works.com/article/30095952/Performance+of+TPL+and+explanation%3F Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. On 12/2/2015 3:55 PM, Ramine wrote: |
| bleachbot <bleachbot@httrack.com>: Dec 02 09:52PM +0100 |
| bleachbot <bleachbot@httrack.com>: Dec 02 10:24PM +0100 |
| Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com>: Dec 02 12:34PM -0600 On 12/1/2015 2:02 AM, Christian Gollwitzer wrote: > questionable to google for "C++ but not C" - the name is so similar and many people mix it up as "C/C++" that I do not believe that > the metrics can distinguish the two. > Christian Metrics are tough to agree upon. One thing that I know for sure, the vast majority of program written before the 1990s were in Assembly, Cobol, and Fortran. A lot of that code is still lurking out there and will need updating some day. Lynn |
| scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal): Dec 02 07:01PM >> Christian >Metrics are tough to agree upon. One thing that I know for sure, the vast majority of program written before the 1990s were in >Assembly, Cobol, and Fortran. A lot of that code is still lurking out there and will need updating some day. You know that for sure. There's still more lines of COBOL in production than any other language (as of 2009). https://scs.senecac.on.ca/~timothy.mckenna/offline/COBOL_not_dead_yet.htm But, there was a tremendous amount of code written in Algol and other languages[*] from 1960 to 1990. There was very little assembler written for production purposes after about 1975. Burroughs stopped shipping the assembler entirely about that time on most of their mainframes (the large systems line never even had an assembler, all systems code is written in a flavor of ALGOL (called NEWP)). [*] e.g. JOVIAL, CORAL 66, PL/1, REXX, et alia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generational_list_of_programming_languages |
| scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal): Dec 02 01:56PM >> This is considered a feature? >Well... When did you last see one that big? But I don't know why they >bothered to put in such an arbitrary restriction. If I'm going to use an editor, I'll use one that will allow me to read my multigigabyte trace and log files as well as edit source code (and if it allows binary editing, all the better). |
| Noob <dontspam@me.com>: Dec 01 10:10PM -0200 Hi there. I know this is a forum for C++ and not VS but I hope this is an error you will find easy to recognize. I have a small VS Solution containing a static library project and an executable. When I try to build it all I receive gigantic error messages. The messages mention things like "__penter", "__pexit", "__thiscall" and I'm afraid I have no idea what they are. I'm going to post the messages below hoping that they will be meaningful to someone willing to give me a little hand here. testlib.lib(rule_params.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol __penter referenced in function "public: __thiscall std::pair<class std::_Tree_iterator<class std::_Tree_val<struct std::_Tree_simple_types<struct std::pair<unsigned int const ,class std::tuple<class std::vector<double,class std::allocator<double> >,class std::vector<double,class std::allocator<double> >,class std::vector<double,class std::allocator<double> > > > > > >,bool>::pair<class std::_Tree_iterator<class std::_Tree_val<struct std::_Tree_simple_types<struct std::pair<unsigned int const ,class std::tuple<class std::vector<double,class std::allocator<double> >,class std::vector<double,class std::allocator<double> >,class std::vector<double,class std::allocator<double> > > > > > >,bool><class std::_Tree_iterator<class std::_Tree_val<struct std::_Tree_simple_types<struct std::pair<unsigned int const ,class std::tuple<class std::vector<double,class std::allocator<double> >,class std::vector<double,class std::allocator<double> >,class std::vector<double,class std::allocator<double> > > > > > > &,bool,void>(class std::_Tree_iterator<class std::_Tree_val<struct std::_Tree_simple_types<struct std::pair<unsigned int const ,class std::tuple<class std::vector<double,class std::allocator<double> >,class std::vector<double,class std::allocator<double> >,class std::vector<double,class std::allocator<double> > > > > > > &,bool &&)" (??$?0AAV?$_Tree_iterator@V?$_Tree_val@U?$_Tree_simple_types@U?$pair@$$CBIV?$tuple@V?$vector@NV?$allocator@N@std@@@std@@V12@V12@@std@@@std@@@std@@@std@@@std@@_NX@?$pair@V?$_Tree_iterator@V?$_Tree_val@U?$_Tree_simple_types@U?$pair@$$CBIV?$tuple@V?$vector@NV?$allocator@N@std@@@std@@V12@V12@@std@@@std@@@std@@@std@@@std@@_N@std@@QAE@AAV?$_Tree_iterator@V?$_Tree_val@U?$_Tree_simple_types@U?$pair@$$CBIV?$tuple@V?$vector@NV?$allocator@N@std@@@std@@V12@V12@@std@@@std@@@std@@@std@@@1@$$QA_N@Z) testlib.lib(stdafx.obj) : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __penter testlib.lib(rule_params.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol __pexit referenced in function "public: __thiscall std::pair<class std::_Tree_iterator<class std::_Tree_val<struct std::_Tree_simple_types<struct std::pair<unsigned int const ,class std::tuple<class std::vector<double,class std::allocator<double> >,class std::vector<double,class std::allocator<double> >,class std::vector<double,class std::allocator<double> > > > > > >,bool>::pair<class std::_Tree_iterator<class std::_Tree_val<struct std::_Tree_simple_types<struct std::pair<unsigned int const ,class std::tuple<class std::vector<double,class std::allocator<double> >,class std::vector<double,class std::allocator<double> >,class std::vector<double,class std::allocator<double> > > > > > >,bool><class std::_Tree_iterator<class std::_Tree_val<struct std::_Tree_simple_types<struct std::pair<unsigned int const ,class std::tuple<class std::vector<double,class std::allocator<double> >,class std::vector<double,class std::allocator<double> >,class std::vector<double,class std::allocator<double> > > > > > > &,bool,void>(class std::_Tree_iterator<class std::_Tree_val<struct std::_Tree_simple_types<struct std::pair<unsigned int const ,class std::tuple<class std::vector<double,class std::allocator<double> >,class std::vector<double,class std::allocator<double> >,class std::vector<double,class std::allocator<double> > > > > > > &,bool &&)" (??$?0AAV?$_Tree_iterator@V?$_Tree_val@U?$_Tree_simple_types@U?$pair@$$CBIV?$tuple@V?$vector@NV?$allocator@N@std@@@std@@V12@V12@@std@@@std@@@std@@@std@@@std@@_NX@?$pair@V?$_Tree_iterator@V?$_Tree_val@U?$_Tree_simple_types@U?$pair@$$CBIV?$tuple@V?$vector@NV?$allocator@N@std@@@std@@V12@V12@@std@@@std@@@std@@@std@@@std@@_N@std@@QAE@AAV?$_Tree_iterator@V?$_Tree_val@U?$_Tree_simple_types@U?$pair@$$CBIV?$tuple@V?$vector@NV?$allocator@N@std@@@std@@V12@V12@@std@@@std@@@std@@@std@@@1@$$QA_N@Z) testlib.lib(stdafx.obj) : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __pexit |
| Noob <dontspam@me.com>: Dec 01 10:14PM -0200 I forgot to mention this is VS 2015. |
| Whups <thats_gonna@leaveamark.invalid>: Dec 01 04:24PM -0800 On 2015-12-02 00:10:29 +0000, Noob said: > "__thiscall" and I'm afraid I have no idea what they are. > I'm going to post the messages below hoping that they will be > meaningful to someone willing to give me a little hand here. [snip] > testlib.lib(stdafx.obj) : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __penter _penter is affected by the /Gh compiler switch. https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/c63a9b7h.aspx [snip] > testlib.lib(stdafx.obj) : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __pexit -pexit is affected by the /GH compiler switch. https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/xc11y76y.aspx Is your project setting these? I can't think of a reason why these would be set unless the author of the project intended to create custom preamble and postamble code for the affected functions. |
| Noob <dontspam@me.com>: Dec 01 10:28PM -0200 OK, I should have done my homework better. In the configuration properties for my static library, I had the options /GH and /Gh listed under "additional options". I don't know how they got there but it looks like this was the root of the problem: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/c63a9b7h.aspx https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/xc11y76y.aspx Also, I already sort of know what __this call is: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ek8tkfbw.aspx Thanks and sorry for the mess. It's about time I stop for today and go play some Half Life 2... |
| Noob <dontspam@me.com>: Dec 01 10:30PM -0200 On 01/12/2015 22:24, Whups wrote: > Is your project setting these? I can't think of a reason why these > would be set unless the author of the project intended to create custom > preamble and postamble code for the affected functions. Ahh, thank you. I had found this just after I posted. Thank you very much in any case. Yes, I have no idea how those options were set in first place. Now the mess is gone. Cheers! |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment