Tuesday, August 2, 2016

Digest for comp.lang.c++@googlegroups.com - 23 updates in 4 topics

"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Aug 01 05:17PM -0700

On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 7:17:20 PM UTC-4, Mr Flibble wrote:
 
> https://twitter.com/tehcoder42/status/760245156478058504
 
> Hypocrites.
 
> /Flibble
 
It's not the religious freedom that's the issue, Leigh. It's the battle
that's unseen by the unsaved, which is a spiritual battle for men's souls.
 
Because of sin, people are dead spiritually. They must be born again to
enter in to eternal life. The evil spirits of this world use that total
blindness to the spirit world to influence our flesh to do things which
are evil.
 
Christians do not fight against people. Many still do, but it's only
out of ignorance and it's not what the Bible teaches us to do.
 
Our goals are the people, and are enemies are the evil spirits:
 
http://biblehub.com/kjv/ephesians/6.htm
10 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of
his might.
11 Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand
against the wiles of the devil.
12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against
principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness
of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be
able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.
14 Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having
on the breastplate of righteousness; 15And your feet shod with the
preparation of the gospel of peace;
16 Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able
to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked.
17 And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit,
which is the word of God:
18 Praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and
watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all
saints;
 
There is an invisible war at work, which has evidence in the Bible, and
evidence in each of our lives:
 
Dr. Steve Lawson "The Invisible War"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDVWvOQvlK8
 
Christians are not fighting the people. They are fighting the evil
spirits which are enticing people who are not born again to bright about
things which are designed to deceive people into Hell, by imposing their
spiritual nature influence upon the flesh, so as to mislead the flesh.
 
Christians fight against evil spirits, against wickedness in high places,
against principalities and dark rulers at work in this world.
 
Our goals are ALWAYS in saving the people by teaching them the truth
about Jesus Christ
 
Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin
Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com>: Aug 02 12:59AM -0400

> <snipped due to Sharia Law in force>
 
It's a good idea to use namespace like so:
 
> cout << "Hello World";
> return 0;
> }
This avoids using std::cout << "Your string goes here";
 
that's enough for today on religion.
Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com>: Aug 02 08:46AM -0700

On Saturday, July 30, 2016 at 7:57:47 AM UTC-4, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
 
> People will see God, see
> Heaven, see eternity, and they will want it because it really is glorious.
 
Not everyone agrees with that, though, see Mark Twain's Letter II.
 
http://www.classicreader.com/book/1930/3/
 
> But, because they were not forgiven by Jesus Christ, their sin debt remains,
> and their name was not written down in the Lamb's Book of Life. As such,
> they will be cast headlong into the burning lake of fire:
 
Or worse
 
http://www.stereophile.com/cables/804aq/index.html#sQc5Lxl9soccSZKk.97
 
 
> My words point you to Jesus Christ and the Bible.
 
What about the older Mesopotamia polytheistic traditions that predate Judaism,
from which the later Judaic stories evolved from? Don't you find the older
stories more convincing, for example, that the divine assembly's motivation
for destroying humans with the flood was because they were making too much
noise and keeping the divine patron Enlil from his sleep? And that the
deity that created humans, Ea-Enki, interfered with Enlil by advising
Atrahasis to build a barge? And that the divine assembly finally came around
when they found that with all the humans dead, there were no sacrifices for
the divine patrons to eat or drink?
 
> I have to give you: pointing you to Him for salvation, and eternal life.
> And it's free for the taking ... all you have to do is come to Him and ask
> Him to forgive you, and He will:
 
It seems unconvincing to me that the deities would be so obsessed with humans
coming to them and asking for forgiveness. For what reason would they want
that? Wouldn't it be more reasonable to think that they created humans
for entertainment? Think about yourself, which would you rather watch, an
entertaining show? or a procession of people asking you for forgiveness?
 
If the deities created you for entertainment, you should seriously consider
doing something interesting, or they might turn you off.
 
Be well,
Daniel
"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Aug 02 08:50AM -0700

On Tuesday, August 2, 2016 at 11:46:46 AM UTC-4, Daniel wrote:
> doing something interesting, or they might turn you off.
 
> Be well,
> Daniel
 
You learn the truth by searching for it.
 
Read and study the Bible, and specifically Jesus Christ. It is not just
a book written by men with fables and stories. It is God's own writing
through the Holy Spirit through men. He Himself will confirm within you
the truth of the content in ways your flesh cannot comprehend.
 
There is a war on for your soul. A casual examination is enough to keep
the truth hidden from you, but a full-on pursuit is required to find it.
All who pursue the truth in this way find it. That's a promise from God
Himself.
 
Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal): Aug 02 04:58PM


>You learn the truth by searching for it.
 
You are star stuff - every molecule in your body was created
in the heart of a star, at some time in the past.
 
You are the universe made manifest.
 
To crib from R.A.H., thou art god.
Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com>: Aug 02 10:54AM -0700

On Tuesday, August 2, 2016 at 12:38:19 AM UTC-4, Real Troll wrote:
 
> It's a good idea to use namespace like so:
 
> > #include <iostream>
> > using namespace std;
 
I understand now why this thread was flagged for abuse!
 
Daniel
Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com>: Aug 02 11:14AM -0700

On Tuesday, August 2, 2016 at 11:51:12 AM UTC-4, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
 
> Read and study the Bible, and specifically Jesus Christ.
 
Rick,
 
I understand you like the Judaic stories and monotheistic traditions. I would encourage you, though, to also read the translations of the older Mesopotamia texts, elements of which were incorporated into the later Judaic texts. I think you might like Old Testament Parallels by Victor Harold Matthews. With the polytheist stories, there are aspects of conflict between the deities, which is interesting, but lost in the monotheistic traditions. In the monotheistic traditions the deity tends to develop an unhealthy obsession with humans, perhaps because he doesn't have any other deities to socialize with. Although I suppose you could argue that Christianity brought something like polytheism back, with the notion of the trinity.
 
Best wishes,
Daniel
"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Aug 02 11:34AM -0700

On Tuesday, August 2, 2016 at 2:15:05 PM UTC-4, Daniel wrote:
 
> I understand you like the Judaic stories and monotheistic traditions. I would encourage you, though, to also read the translations of the older Mesopotamia texts, elements of which were incorporated into the later Judaic texts. I think you might like Old Testament Parallels by Victor Harold Matthews. With the polytheist stories, there are aspects of conflict between the deities, which is interesting, but lost in the monotheistic traditions. In the monotheistic traditions the deity tends to develop an unhealthy obsession with humans, perhaps because he doesn't have any other deities to socialize with. Although I suppose you could argue that Christianity brought something like polytheism back, with the notion of the trinity.
 
> Best wishes,
> Daniel
 
There is an enemy of God at work in this world teaching false things. God
teaches us true things. We do not automatically turn to God because we are
fallen in sin. We believe the enemy's lies ahead of God's truth because
God is spirit, and His words are spirit and they are life. The enemy speaks
to our flesh, our feelings, our emotions, our flesh-based reason. He has
a goal in so doing, and that is to deceive us so we will not come to God,
will not come to Jesus Christ, will not come to truth, and therefore be
saved.
 
The enemy is trying to keep you from coming to the truth, and to that which
is yours for the taking: eternal life in the paradise of God.
 
I teach and point you to the truth. I point you to read and study the
Bible, Daniel. God Himself will reveal the truth of it within your soul,
if you will pursue it. It won't be me or any other person convincing you,
but God Himself will convince you of its truth because it is just that:
truth.
 
Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin
Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com>: Aug 02 11:52AM -0700

On Tuesday, August 2, 2016 at 2:34:53 PM UTC-4, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
 
> I point you to read and study the Bible
 
I agree with you that the biblical stories and traditions are important,
as is the older body of texts that the biblical traditions drew on, and
altered to their needs.
 
> God Himself will reveal the truth of it within your soul,
> if you will pursue it ... but God Himself will convince you of its truth
> because it is just that: truth.
 
Now I think you're satirizing the Christian way of proselytizing :-) (blessed are they that have not seen and yet have believed, etc.)
 
Best regards,
Daniel
"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Aug 02 01:05PM -0700

On Tuesday, August 2, 2016 at 2:52:55 PM UTC-4, Daniel wrote:
 
> I agree with you that the biblical stories and traditions are important,
> as is the older body of texts that the biblical traditions drew on, and
> altered to their needs.
 
The Bible is a fundamental document. It does not draw from other sources.
There is, however, an enemy of God who seeks to undermine the knowledge of
God by introducing all manner of lies regarding God, His prophets, the
recording of history through the Biblical account, but as we go along even
our sciences are proving everything the Bible says is true.
 
It's the nature of truth. It speaks with one voice and cannot lie. It is,
therefore, no matter how it's examined, or in which way it's scrutinized,
always standing upon its own statements and self.
 
Lies, however, can appear to be a particular way, but always crumble under
close scrutiny.
 
> > if you will pursue it ... but God Himself will convince you of its truth
> > because it is just that: truth.
 
> Now I think you're satirizing the Christian way of proselytizing :-) (blessed are they that have not seen and yet have believed, etc.)
 
Read and study the scriptures, Daniel. Themselves. Not other sources as
well. You'll find they are consistent, and they tell a story that is not
found in any other document, past, present, or future.
 
God Himself is the author of the Bible, His Holy Spirit at work through
men, penning those things He would give to us from the beginning, through
until the time of today, and until the end time.
 
Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin
Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: Aug 02 10:27PM +0100

On 02/08/2016 21:05, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
 
> The Bible is a fundamental document. It does not draw from other sources.
> There is, however, an enemy of God who seeks to undermine the knowledge of
> God by introducing all manner of lies regarding God, His prophets, the
 
God doesn't exist though.
 
 
> It's the nature of truth. It speaks with one voice and cannot lie. It is,
> therefore, no matter how it's examined, or in which way it's scrutinized,
> always standing upon its own statements and self.
 
The Bible is erroneous; we know this thanks to the evidence.
 
 
> Lies, however, can appear to be a particular way, but always crumble under
> close scrutiny.
 
What lies?
 
Satanism seems like a good religion for an atheist. Maybe I shall
become a Satanist. Yes. I am now a Satanist.
 
/Flibble
Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com>: Aug 02 03:33PM -0700

On Tuesday, August 2, 2016 at 4:05:56 PM UTC-4, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> Read and study the scriptures, Daniel. Themselves. Not other sources as
> well. You'll find they are consistent, and they tell a story that is not
> found in any other document, past, present, or future.
 
Rick,
 
I find it illuminating to read your responses because they illustrate the
power of the story and the story teller, how great stories affect us and give
meaning to our lives. I can understand a little of your awe by remembering the
affect on my thinking of the stories I read when I was young, particularly
Darkness at Noon by Arthur Koestler, and the burnt out cases by Graham Green.
 
Protests aside, I still think you would find it interesting to read about the
relationship between the writings of the Old Testament and other, more
ancient, Near Eastern literature. If you come from an evangelical background,
you might even experience that as a dangerous pleasure! But I have no doubt
you would enjoy other takes on the familiar stories.
 
Kindest regards,
Daniel
"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Aug 02 03:59PM -0700

On Tuesday, August 2, 2016 at 5:27:45 PM UTC-4, Mr Flibble wrote:
> [snip]
 
I thought you added me to your banned list.
 
FWIW, Leigh, I'm very impressed with your neogfx library. It's quite
beautiful.
 
Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin
"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Aug 02 04:04PM -0700

On Tuesday, August 2, 2016 at 6:33:22 PM UTC-4, Daniel wrote:
> you would enjoy other takes on the familiar stories.
 
> Kindest regards,
> Daniel
 
You see a similarity between the things of the Bible and what you call
prior writings.
 
I'll point you to a conclusion drawn by Napoleon Bonaparte regarding Jesus
Christ and Christianity. Bearing in mind that God is one, and that He
does not change, and is the same yesterday, today, and forever, you can
place your assessment alongside his:
 
http://www.stempublishing.com/magazines/bt/BT17/1889_319_Napoleons_Testimony.html
 
"I know men, and I tell you that Jesus Christ is not a man. Superficial
minds see a resemblance between Christ and the founders of empires and
the gods of other religions. That resemblance does not exist. There is
between Christianity and every other religion the distance of infinity.
 
"We can say to the authors of every other religion, You are neither gods
nor the agents of Deity. You are but missionaries of falsehood, moulded
from the same clay with the rest of mortals. You are made with all the
passions and vices inseparable from them. Your temples and your priests
proclaim your origin. Such will be the judgment, the cry of conscience,
of whoever examines the gods and the temples of paganism..."
 
There is nothing like the Bible. It is the greatest selling book of all
time, and not for nothing. In it, you meet the One true God, God Almighty,
and you learn about Him, our life here on Earth, our future, why we're in
the state we're in, and the solution to our troubles (His Son).
 
There are no other documents anywhere which convey the history and teachings
of the Bible, as a single source from beginning to end, with the central
theme of everything being Jesus Christ, and His rescue of mankind from their
sin.
 
If you come to that realization, the rest of your life will be changed,
because you will be on the pursuit of truth.
 
Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin
Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com>: Aug 02 04:24PM -0700

On Tuesday, August 2, 2016 at 7:04:26 PM UTC-4, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> of the Bible, as a single source from beginning to end, with the central
> theme of everything being Jesus Christ, and His rescue of mankind from their
> sin.
 
I understand, it's the stories that interest you, not the scholarship that places
the texts in their historical context. Much like, I suppose, it's Shakespeare's
plays that interest me, not the Oxfordian vs Stratford debate.
 
Best wishes,
Daniel
MikeCopeland <mrc2323@cox.net>: Aug 02 12:27PM -0700

I am trying to implement a std::map object with a structure that
contains a std::map object within each object (is that possible?). In
the class below I have a number of variables and functions that all seem
to work...except the std::map named "eyMap". The function "setYearMax"
fails when I execute the code, but other setters and getters work as
desired.
Is there something fundamentally wrong with this logic, or is here
another way to declare and use a map-like structure within this class?
Please advise. TIA
 
class DBE_Info
{
public:
void setYoB(int year);
void setAge(int age);
void setType(char eType);
void setYearMax(int eYear);
void setRefName(string name);
void updPart(void);
void normalizeAgeType(void);
void computeYoB(void);
int getYoB(void);
int getAge(void);
int getEYear(void);
string getRefName(void);
char getType(void);
int getPart(void);
int getYearMax(int eYear);
DBE_Info(); // This is the constructor
~DBE_Info(); // This is the destructor
private:
int dAge, eYear;
int birthYear;
int yearsPart;
char entType;
string refName;
map<int, int> eyMap;
map<int, int>::iterator eyIter;
};
// Member functions definitions including constructor
DBE_Info::DBE_Info(void)
{
birthYear = yearsPart = dAge = eYear = 0;
entType = 'A';
refName = "";
eyMap.clear(); // is this needed within the constructor?
}
DBE_Info::~DBE_Info(void) { return; }
void DBE_Info::setYoB(int year) { birthYear = year; return; }
void DBE_Info::setRefName(string name) { refName = name; return; }
string DBE_Info::getRefName(void) { return refName; }
int DBE_Info::getEYear(void) { return eYear; }
int DBE_Info::getYoB(void) { return birthYear; }
void DBE_Info::setType(char eType) { entType = (eType == ' ') ?
'A' : eType; return; }
char DBE_Info::getType(void) { return entType; }
void DBE_Info::updPart(void) { yearsPart++; return; }
int DBE_Info::getPart(void) { return yearsPart; }
void DBE_Info::computeYoB(void)
{
dAge = nAge, eYear = eventYear;
if(nAge >= maxAgegroup)
{
int qq = (cGender == 'M') ? 0 : 1;
entType = age2Str[cRCode-'a'][nAge][qq].cEntType;
return;
} // if
if(birthYear > 0) return;
int wYear = eventYear;
if((wYear >= 0) && (wYear < 100)) wYear +=1900;
if(wYear < EPOCH) wYear +=100;
birthYear = eventYear-nAge;
return;
} // computeYoB
void DBE_Info::setYearMax(int eYear)
{
eyMap[eYear] = maxAgegroup; // This FAILS!!
return;
} // setYearMax
int DBE_Info::getYearMax(int eYear)
{
eyIter = eyMap.find(eYear);
if(eyIter != eyMap.end()) return eyIter->second;
else
{
return 89;
}
} // getYearMax
 
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid>: Aug 02 03:40PM -0400

On 8/2/2016 3:27 PM, MikeCopeland wrote:
> I am trying to implement a std::map object with a structure that
> contains a std::map object within each object (is that possible?).
 
Why wouldn't it be? You can have a vector of deques of sets of
strings... No particular limitation on what is contained in what.
 
> the class below I have a number of variables and functions that all seem
> to work...except the std::map named "eyMap". The function "setYearMax"
> fails when I execute the code,
 
Should we now commence guessing how it "fails", or will you give us some
hint
 
> desired.
> Is there something fundamentally wrong with this logic, or is here
> another way to declare and use a map-like structure within this class?
 
At a first glance there is nothing inherently wrong with it. Try FAQ
5.8 (if you can find it, look for mirrors of C++ FAQ Lite).
 
> };
> // Member functions definitions including constructor
> DBE_Info::DBE_Info(void)
 
Don't use this C-ism. If you intend to have nothing between the
parentheses, don't put anything there. Ought to be
 
DBE_Info::DBE_Info()
 
> birthYear = yearsPart = dAge = eYear = 0;
> entType = 'A';
> refName = "";
 
Don't use assignments. Use initializer list.
 
> eyMap.clear(); // is this needed within the constructor?
 
Nope.
 
> }
> DBE_Info::~DBE_Info(void) { return; }
 
Same note about "void" as above.
 
> void DBE_Info::setYoB(int year) { birthYear = year; return; }
> void DBE_Info::setRefName(string name) { refName = name; return; }
 
Don't pass objects by value. Pass them by const ref.
 
> return 89;
> }
> } // getYearMax
 
Try formatting your code better and add comments explaining your
intentions. Your code is not easy to read.
 
V
--
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask
Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee>: Aug 02 10:50PM +0300

On 2.08.2016 22:27, MikeCopeland wrote:
> I am trying to implement a std::map object with a structure that
> contains a std::map object within each object (is that possible?).
 
Yes, that's ok so far as you don't attempt to store a map object inside
itself.
 
> char entType;
> string refName;
> map<int, int> eyMap;
 
That's OK.
 
> map<int, int>::iterator eyIter;
 
Storing an iterator long-term in the class seems not so good idea, why
do you think you need this?
 
> entType = 'A';
> refName = "";
> eyMap.clear(); // is this needed within the constructor?
 
No.
 
> void DBE_Info::computeYoB(void)
> {
> dAge = nAge, eYear = eventYear;
 
Does not compile.
 
> if(nAge >= maxAgegroup)
 
Does not compile: no nAge, no maxAgegroup, etc.
 
> void DBE_Info::setYearMax(int eYear)
> {
> eyMap[eYear] = maxAgegroup; // This FAILS!!
 
In principle something like this should work fine. This exact code
however fails already at compile time because there is no maxAgegroup
anywhere.
 
Maybe maxAgegroup should be a parameter here? Are you aware that a
function can have multiple parameters?
 
 
> return 89;
> }
> } // getYearMax
 
Your code contains a lot of noise (unneeded 'void' and 'return;'
thingies). Also it produces a lot of compile errors, which kind of
contradicts your claim it failed at run time. Anyway, you did not dare
to tell what error did you got.
 
Try to prepare a complete (preferably compilable) example of your code,
together with the main() function, demonstrating the problem. See
"http://www.graphics.cornell.edu/~martin/docs/c++-faq/how-to-post.html#[5.7]"
MikeCopeland <mrc2323@cox.net>: Aug 02 01:45PM -0700

> Should we now commence guessing how it "fails", or will you give us some
> hint
 
It doesn't update the map object when I walk through the code with the
debugger, and there's nothing in the map object when I access the object
in later code. In essence, nothing happens in the code that fails.
 
 
> Don't use this C-ism. If you intend to have nothing between the
> parentheses, don't put anything there. Ought to be
 
> DBE_Info::DBE_Info()
 
Point taken. Thanks for that, as well as the oher suggestions.
 
> Try formatting your code better and add comments explaining your
> intentions. Your code is not easy to read.
 
I culled my (numerous) comments in favor of posting even more code (that
would be more difficult to read). My apologies...
 
 
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
MikeCopeland <mrc2323@cox.net>: Aug 02 01:45PM -0700

In article <0LOdnU2jDoMdZD3KnZ2dnUU78fnNnZ2d@giganews.com>,
myfirstname@osa.pri.ee says...
 
> > map<int, int>::iterator eyIter;
 
> Storing an iterator long-term in the class seems not so good idea, why
> do you think you need this?
 
No reason, other than documenting how the map object is being
accessed. Using a global (within a loop) would be fine for me.
 
> Does not compile.
 
> > if(nAge >= maxAgegroup)
 
> Does not compile: no nAge, no maxAgegroup, etc.
 
True - because it's a global data item, as are some other variables
referenced in the code I posted. (Yes, I know the use of global
variables isn't recommended, but it's my bad...)
 
> Maybe maxAgegroup should be a parameter here? Are you aware that a
> function can have multiple parameters?
 
Yes. My laziness being exposed... 8<{{
 
> thingies). Also it produces a lot of compile errors, which kind of
> contradicts your claim it failed at run time. Anyway, you did not dare
> to tell what error did you got.
 
All true. I knew I was posting a lot here, but I didn't want to show
code that (I thought) wasn't pertinent to the issue. My apoligies.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: Aug 02 10:23PM +0100

On 02/08/2016 20:40, Victor Bazarov wrote:
> On 8/2/2016 3:27 PM, MikeCopeland wrote:
>> void DBE_Info::setRefName(string name) { refName = name; return; }
 
> Don't pass objects by value. Pass them by const ref.
 
And miss out on move semantics?
 
/Flibble
Ramine <ramine@1.1>: Aug 02 11:40AM -0400

Hello...
 
Stackful coroutines library for Delphi and FreePascal,
you can port it to C++.
 
 
Description:
 
This library to do Stackful Coroutines was ported to the 32 bit
FreePascal and to 64 bit Delphi compilers and enhanced with a semaphore
and a mutex by Amine Moulay Ramdane.
 
Because threads alone are expensive on windows because each thread uses
one Megabytes of stack, so you can use this library with my Threadpool
engine that scales well to be able to serve a great number of internet
connections or TCP/IP socket connections, and of course you can do with
it many other things such us simulations etc.
 
Use the threads.pas unit for 32 bit compilers, and use threads64.pas
unit for 64 bit compilers.
 
Main features:
 
Very small RAM overhead and provides semaphore and mutex.
You can download this library from:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/stackful-coroutines-library-for-delphi-and-freepascal
 
Look at the defines.inc include file, you can configure it like this:
 
{$DEFINE XE} for Delphi XE compilers.
 
{$DEFINE FPC} for FreePascal.
 
{$DEFINE Delphi} for Delphi 7 to Delphi 2007 compilers.
 
Language: FPC Pascal v2.2.0+ / Delphi 5+: http://www.freepascal.org/
 
Operating Systems: Win (x86).
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
bleachbot <bleachbot@httrack.com>: Aug 02 05:39PM +0200

You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)