- More political philosophy now.. - 1 Update
- About Parallel For.. - 1 Update
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Oct 10 03:52PM -0700 Hello... Read this: More political philosophy now.. I think the success of USA has to be that USA has to understand the way USA is governed, take for example the separation of powers, What is the separation of powers? The U.S. Constitution set up three separate but equal branches of government: the legislative branch, or Congress, makes the law; the executive, led by the president, executes the law; and the judicial, or courts, interprets the law. But we have to be smarter than that, the separation of powers is not "sufficient", so we have to be smarter and know that the legislative branch has to understand how to make the legislative branch successful ! look for example at USA , its congress is constituted with both conservatives and democrats, but this legislative branch has to understand a very important requirement that the legislative branch has to know how to be "moderation" to not cause violence or civil war inside the system ! this is the key to success ! thus the legislative branch of USA has to avoid "extremism" that causes violence or civil war inside the system , so it has to know how to be "moderation" ! I have proved that morality is perfection at best. But this perfection at best must know the following: What is the essence of a human society ? We can not call a human society a society if it is not "order" , order is fondamental to a society, but there is not only order but also the sens of "sacrifice", and there is hard sacrifice and soft sacrifice, if we want today to be a "civilization", we have not to generalize "hard" sacrifice, like being a warrior type of people, like soldiers of an army, to the general population and tell them to be this hard sacrifice, because this violence of warriors like the military and the police has to be kept in control inside the sphere of the military and the police so that to not cause violence in the rest of the society, this is the same for the hard sacrifice of other part of the population like scientists and engineers, because they are doing a "hard" work and we can call it "hard" sacrifice, so to be able to call a civilization by the name of a civilization , we have not to generalize this "hard" sacrifice to the rest of the population and tell all the population to be hard sacrifice, because it is too much violence, and the rest of the population that is not hard sacrifice has to understand that there is also what we call "soft" sacrifice that is much less violence such as being tolerance and being compassion and helping the others without being a hard sacrifice. Now i think there is something really important about the essence of humanity, i think that it is "related" to morality, i said that morality is perfection at best, and the goal to attain is the goal of life that is to attain absolute perfection or absolute happiness, so morality that is perfection at best is pushed towards absolute perfection or absolute happiness, but we have to do more philosophy to understand better the essence of human evolution, i think that morality of past history has needed more "diversity" to be able for humans to survive and to be more quality, and diversity has given "immensity" or big "quantity", and you can notice it inside the evolution of life, that life has needed a greater number of monkeys and many tests and failures by evolution on them to evolve towards quality and smartness and so that the monkey become human and smartness of human. So as you are noticing "diversity" has given "immensity" or "big" "quantity" and that both diversity and immensity or big quantity have given quality and smartness(read below about the essence of smartness to notice it). This is too how "morality" has evolved, morality has needed diversity and immensity or big quantity so that to be more perfection, this is why morality too of today is needing diversity and immensity or big quantity so that to be perfection, and morality of today knows that perfection of today is also having the right "imperfections" (that are also diversity) to be able to be the right perfection(read what i wrote about neo-nazism below to notice it). What is the essence of truth ? This is a good subject of political philosophy ! How do we measure the truth ? The truth is measured by our our senses and by our smartness and by rationalism and by empiricism ! So i think we can feel the relativeness of truth, i mean that the truth is measured by a reference of measure , but there can be many references of measure that gives different results of truth ! and thus we have to "prioritize" to be able to succeed ! i give you an example: when i said (read below) that decent morality has to be measured by the reference of measure that is perfection at best so that the government enforce more correctly "order", this government needs to prioritize wich of the reference of measures of the truth are more "valid" ! so there is the reference of measure that is happiness or absolute happiness , but since law enforcement of "order" that is of a "highest" priority, so the "truth" of: is it decent morality or not ? must be measured by the reference of measure that is perfection at best in itself so that to say that it is decent morality or not ! so here again you are noticing the relativeness of the truth since the reference of measure is choosen among many and is prioritized ! Read my following previous thoughts about the essence of smartness and the essence of morality, about the essence of smartness and the essence of morality so that you understand better: What is the essence of human smartness ? This is a good subject of political philosophy.. So we have to be smarter to answer it correctly.. Individual human smartness is composed of genetical smartness and cultural smartness.. But if you keep talking about individual smartness neglecting the smartness of a group of humans, this is not correct. But what is the smartness of a group of humans ? It is composed of individual smartness , and the smartness of the interaction of the group of humans, but this is not a sufficient definition because it must be more understood, because the smartness of the interaction of a group of people is also the fact that we have to know that you can fail to solve the problem because you have not found the right "path" that is more hidden to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem, and this makes us understand that the smartest among us can fail at solving a problem or inventing algorithms if he didn't find the correct path that is more "hidden" to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem , and this is why we can say that a great number of people that are smart and less smart can permit us to find the path that is more hidden to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem, so this makes us understand that the smartness of a "group" of humans is also dependent on less smart people that can find the right path that is hidden to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem. This is why our world needs arabs and needs white europeans and needs asians and needs south americans etc. to be able to solve problems and to be able to invent new things. More about me: As you have noticed i am a white arab, and a more serious computer programmer, but you have to know more about me, my father is very smart, the genetical IQ of my father is 135, and my genetical IQ is around 120, but i have lost some IQ points because my nutrition was not so good because i was disliking many vegetables and my nutrition was not balanced so i have lost some IQ points because of this envirenmental factor, but my genetical IQ is around 120. And i invite you to read the following webpage: Raise Your Child's IQ with Multivitamins http://tipsdiscover.com/health/raise-your-childs-iq-with-multivitamins/ And here is my proof of what is morality: About the essence of morality More political philosophy now.. If you have noticed on my writing i said that: 1- Morality is reliability And i said that: 2- Morality is reliability at best And i said that: 3- Morality is perfection at best. But you will have the tendency to say that my above definitions are not correct thinking, but here is my logical proof of my above definitions: When i said that: 1- Morality is reliability Look at the dictionary here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reliability It says that: Reliability is: The quality or state of being reliable. So when i say that: Morality is reliability that means that it can be Morality is the quality of being reliability, so it is like a "concept" of reliability, that means that it can vary from 0% to 100%, and we know that since morality is perfection at best from my following logical proof: Because morality exists because we have to avoid the bad And we have to avoid the bad by also trying to maximize at best the good And trying to maximize at best the good is also called: perfection at best So morality is pushed towards absolute perfection So that to be able to solve all our problems And be absolute happiness that is the goal But morality of today must at least be a decent morality To avoid desorder and violence inside the system And we know that it is inherent to maximizing at best the good that it is also minimizing at best "failures", so i think my above logical proof is correct. So when i say above that: Reliability is the quality of being reliable, it means that the quality of being reliable is also measured by measuring prefection at best, because being reliability is also solving the problem to be able to be perfection at best. Also when i say Morality is reliability, it means that it is not only that reliability is the quality of being reliable, but it is also a state of being reliable, because as i said in my above logical proof: "But morality of today must at least be a decent morality To avoid desorder and violence inside the system" That means that reliability that is the quality of being reliable must be at least decent morality, because without being at least decent morality we can not call it morality, because there is like a constrain over morality that must be at least decent morality to be able to call it morality. So here again we have to be smart, how can we "measure" to be able to call it decent morality ? here again we have to be smart, there is "absolute" measure and "relative" measure, so you can measure morality by absolute measure that is "absolute perfection" that is like absolute happiness, or you can measure morality relatively by "happiness", or you can measure morality relatively by the actual perfection at best in itself ! and i think that we have to measure morality by the actual perfection at best and say for example that this actual perfection at best is "order" that enforce calling morality a decent morality , so the actual perfection at best can call morality a decent morality to enforce "order" that is "necessary". Also i think that the tendency of today is that Perfection at best of today is balancing perfection with "civilization" so that to not being savagery or desorder. Now i also said also that: And i said that: 2- Morality is reliability at best And i said that: 3- Morality is perfection at best. And that can be understood by my above proof and my above writing. More political philosophy now.. I will speak about an important subject in political philosophy: As you have noticed beauty and love has been created by wildness of nature, and after that in the past since perfection was not enough to ensure a decent morality , that is a decent perfection, humans have behaved more violently with wars and by practicing slavery etc, so in that past people were suffering more desorder and violence etc, so i think we have to be wiser by looking at our actual morality that is perfection at best,and to be able to judge it more "wisely", so do we have to be pessimistic of our morality ? i don't think so, because there is a also a big constrain that morality has to be at least a decent morality that is a decent perfection to avoid desorder and violence inside the system, but here comes an important question: How to judge that it is a decent morality ? here again there is also interpretation of neo-nazism that is too violent that don't know how to tune perfection correctly, because neo-nazism is racism and it is extremism of "perfection" this is why they are discriminating too much, and this is not perfection at best that is morality, because perfection(and thus morality) is also knowing how to maximize at best success by minimizing at best failures, here again to be successful at minimizing the failures you have to "prioritize", this is why neo-nazism must know how to accept the right "imperfections" to be able to be "correct" perfection, this is why countries such as Canada and other european countries are accepting arab immigrants even if some arab immigrants are less beautiful than white europeans, because beautifulness is interpreted as being less important than the fact that arab immigrants are useful for economic growth and for the the social system etc. and this is morality that prioritize to be able to be successful, this is why neo-nazism that is too violent towards immigrants is not correct morality that knows how to manage itself, so i don't agree with neo-nazism and such idelogies that contain many bugs. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Oct 10 03:15PM -0700 Hello, Read this: About Parallel For.. I have just read the following webpage about the implementation of Parallel For, here it is: PARALLEL PROGRAMMING IN DELPHI PART I. PARALLEL FOR https://vitaliburkov.wordpress.com/2011/10/15/parallel-programming-in-delphi/ And i think that Parallel For that is implemented in a library is not efficient, because i think that Parallel For has to be implemented in a sophisticated manner by the compiler, but i think that sophisticated automatic parallelization by compilers has failed, so i think that i will not implement a Parallel For. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment