Friday, December 21, 2018

Digest for comp.programming.threads@googlegroups.com - 11 updates in 8 topics

Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Dec 19 03:09PM -0800

Hello..
 
Read this:
 
 
Read again, i correct some last typos:
 
About white supremacism and neo-nazism..
 
White supremacists and neo-nazis and such violent people and ideologies
are not correct "security" and are not a correct order because they are
too violent, and because they have to know how to play
it "safer" and this takes more smartness and more knowledge
and more wisdom, this is why i think that the dangerosity for world
order of white supremacists and neo-nazis is too risky that we must not
follow them and we must not give them governance.
 
Please read the rest to understand my thoughts:
 
About order and rationality..
 
As you have noticed i am a white arab, and i am a more
serious computer programmer who has invented many scalable
algorithms and there implementations, and i think
i will sell some of them to Microsoft or Intel
or Embarcadero companies.
 
Now i have come to an interesting subject about philosophy..
 
I think you know me more now..
 
Now you have also to understand my way of doing, i am
trying to find a way that permits me to "model" more efficiently
"humanity", this is why you are seeing me answering some
questions such as: From where comes a scientific mind ?
and from where comes order ?
 
Now you have to understand my way, let's for example look at me,
as you have noticed i am a more "rational" type of person that
is more technical and that is mathematics and i am
also a more wise type of person and i am a gentleman type of person,
now let us return to the basis of being more "rational" type of person,
as you are noticing since i am more rational type of person,
this more rational, in me, permits me to be more "precise" and more
"measure" and more "logic" and more "rational", and this causes that it
makes me see less rational type of persons as "inferior" thinking, so
this more rational in me permits me to be higher level of quality of
thinking, and i am not a narcissist, but a narcissist has the same
effect as he want to be superior thinking, but a narcissist has an
abnormal behavior that leads him to problems in society, look
for example at Donald Trump, he is a narcissist type of person,
but he is having problems with his behavior that we can
judge as abnormal behavior that causes problems, so
as you have noticed i am not a narcissist, because i am
a gentleman type of person, but the very basis is that
i am being a higher level of quality of thinking because
i am a more rational type of person, so this permits
us to model more correctly humanity, this is why
you have seen me writing the following:
 
About quality and about security..
 
I am more "smart", and you have to understand my work,
being more rational is not sufficient, you have
to know how to play it "safer", and i am also showing you how to be able
to "model" our humanity, and i am showing you how to be "quality" and
how to be "security", first here is what i said about being more rational:
 
I have come to an interesting subject..
 
So i was asking myself the following question:
 
From where comes a scientific mind ?
 
I think i was able to extract the architectural idea that answer this
question:
 
When you are a more rational type of person(i mean it is genetical in
you), you will for example use more logic and more measure and more
rationality, and this high level of quality of more rationality that you
have does permit you to be more "selective" of your type of culture,
because since you are more rationality, you will for example be able to
"recognize" the great importance of science and technology, so you will
start to give weights and priorities this technological and/or
scientific type of cultures, so you will start to give
a "much" higher priority to logic and to math and to philosophy or
political philosophy and to science, so since this culture is of great
importance you will choose more this type of culture, this is why this
will be reflected in your type of culture that you have. This is the
kind of person that genetically i am , i am a more rational type of
person, and i am a more wise type of person and i am a gentleman type of
person.
 
Second, but being more rational that brings quality is not sufficient,
you have also to be security, and here is what i said about security:
 
How to reconcil high priority of survival and order ?
 
This is an interesting subject of political philosophy..
 
Because even a violent ideology like nazism bases its ideology
on "order" first !
 
So it is easy to see that the first very important thing is order !
 
You can not call a country a country if order is not satisfied !
 
So from wich causes we get more order ?
 
I think that order comes from the fact that we are security
for oneself and others, and what are the causes that we
are security for oneself and others ? we are security
for oneself and others for different causes, here they
are:
 
1- We are good morality that takes
care of security.
 
2- We are "sensibility" that takes care of security
 
3- We are more disciplined to take care of the system
as a critical system that needs the right requirements
for the right security both locally and globally.
 
4- We are fear that takes care of security of oneself
or others.
 
 
And this is related to my following thoughts:
 
You have to understand Buddha
 
I think the main point of Buddha is that he wanted from us
to have more "hindsight" and he wanted from us
to be capable of introspection, and he has started to discipline
his followers to be capable of guiding there instincts that
are more "savage" to the right direction. This permit us also to be
more "security" for oneself and for others, and this more security
is also like love and compassion.
 
This is why i said before:
 
If we ask a question of how can we be more love or/and compassion ?
 
I am also like Buddha, so i will answer like this..
 
Even if you are not "equipped" with the right genetical requirements of
more sensibility and love, you have to know that fear for others
and oneself also make us "care" for oneself or others , but
if you don't fear for yourself or others , so to "emulate" fear for
oneself and for others or to emulate compassion and love, like
emulation in software programming, you have to be more rational and more
disciplined and think the system like a critical system that needs
"security", so you have to be more capable, so
more "educated" to be able to set the right requirements for
security locally and globally, this needs of course more quality
and more perfection.
 
But i think also that this main point of Buddha is also the "basis" of
today psychology, i think the main point of psychology is also to permit
us to "understand" more ourselves, this means also to have more
"hindsight" and more "introspection", and after this first step,
psychology wants
also from us to be capable to make more "order" in our lives(and
"discipline" is inherent to "order" because of today constraints of
empirical world), and psychology wants from us to be able of guiding
our instincts that are more savage in the right direction, and all this
is like the main point of Buddha.
 
 
There is a smart question inherent to my previous question of:
 
How to reconcil high priority of survival and order ?
 
and it is:
 
Do we need to fear capitalism of today or fear "more" free market
internationally of today because it is not "order" ?
 
I think we have to understand the "spirit" of capitalism of today
to understand more what is happening, i think capitalism of today
is more "soften", and it ressembles a "sportive" competition,
but it can not be called a violent fight, because the actual capitalism
lives in a more appropriate "context" that constrain it to be more
respect ! because capitalism has to not ignore "Fordism", and has to not
ignore consumer confidence index that it must higher globally and
locally and this causes more respect, and high economic growth of many
countries like african countries and arab countries is more
attractive for economic investment etc. etc. and i think that this more
interconnected economies bring more peace and more stability and Fordism
has noticed it.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Dec 19 03:02PM -0800

Hello..
 
 
About white supremacism and neo-nazism..
 
White supremacists and neo-nazis and such violent people and idielogies,
are not correct "security" and are not a correct order because they are
too violent, and because they have to know how to play
it "safer" and this takes more smartness and more knowledge
and more wisdom, this is why i think that the dangerosity for world
order of white supremacists and neo-nazis is too risky that we must not
follow them and we must not give them governance.
 
Please read the rest to understand my thoughts:
 
About order and rationality..
 
As you have noticed i am a white arab, and i am a more
serious computer programmer who has invented many scalable
algorithms and there implementations, and i think
i will sell some of them to Microsoft or Intel
or Embarcadero companies.
 
Now i have come to an interesting subject about philosophy..
 
I think you know me more now..
 
Now you have also to understand my way of doing, i am
trying to find a way that permits me to "model" more efficiently
"humanity", this is why you are seeing me answering some
questions such as: From where comes a scientific mind ?
and from where comes order ?
 
Now you have to understand my way, let's for example look at me,
as you have noticed i am a more "rational" type of person that
is more technical and that is mathematics and i am
also a more wise type of person and i am a gentleman type of person,
now let us return to the basis of being more "rational" type of person,
as you are noticing since i am more rational type of person,
this more rational, in me, permits me to be more "precise" and more
"measure" and more "logic" and more "rational", and this causes that it
makes me see less rational type of persons as "inferior" thinking, so
this more rational in me permits me to be higher level of quality of
thinking, and i am not a narcissist, but a narcissist has the same
effect as he want to be superior thinking, but a narcissist has an
abnormal behavior that leads him to problems in society, look
for example at Donald Trump, he is a narcissist type of person,
but he is having problems with his behavior that we can
judge as abnormal behavior that causes problems, so
as you have noticed i am not a narcissist, because i am
a gentleman type of person, but the very basis is that
i am being a higher level of quality of thinking because
i am a more rational type of person, so this permits
us to model more correctly humanity, this is why
you have seen me writing the following:
 
About quality and about security..
 
I am more "smart", and you have to understand my work,
being more rational is not sufficient, you have
to know how to play it "safer", and i am also showing you how to be able
to "model" our humanity, and i am showing you how to be "quality" and
how to be "security", first here is what i said about being more rational:
 
I have come to an interesting subject..
 
So i was asking myself the following question:
 
From where comes a scientific mind ?
 
I think i was able to extract the architectural idea that answer this
question:
 
When you are a more rational type of person(i mean it is genetical in
you), you will for example use more logic and more measure and more
rationality, and this high level of quality of more rationality that you
have does permit you to be more "selective" of your type of culture,
because since you are more rationality, you will for example be able to
"recognize" the great importance of science and technology, so you will
start to give weights and priorities this technological and/or
scientific type of cultures, so you will start to give
a "much" higher priority to logic and to math and to philosophy or
political philosophy and to science, so since this culture is of great
importance you will choose more this type of culture, this is why this
will be reflected in your type of culture that you have. This is the
kind of person that genetically i am , i am a more rational type of
person, and i am a more wise type of person and i am a gentleman type of
person.
 
Second, but being more rational that brings quality is not sufficient,
you have also to be security, and here is what i said about security:
 
How to reconcil high priority of survival and order ?
 
This is an interesting subject of political philosophy..
 
Because even a violent ideology like nazism bases its ideology
on "order" first !
 
So it is easy to see that the first very important thing is order !
 
You can not call a country a country if order is not satisfied !
 
So from wich causes we get more order ?
 
I think that order comes from the fact that we are security
for oneself and others, and what are the causes that we
are security for oneself and others ? we are security
for oneself and others for different causes, here they
are:
 
1- We are good morality that takes
care of security.
 
2- We are "sensibility" that takes care of security
 
3- We are more disciplined to take care of the system
as a critical system that needs the right requirements
for the right security both locally and globally.
 
4- We are fear that takes care of security of oneself
or others.
 
 
And this is related to my following thoughts:
 
You have to understand Buddha
 
I think the main point of Buddha is that he wanted from us
to have more "hindsight" and he wanted from us
to be capable of introspection, and he has started to discipline
his followers to be capable of guiding there instincts that
are more "savage" to the right direction. This permit us also to be
more "security" for oneself and for others, and this more security
is also like love and compassion.
 
This is why i said before:
 
If we ask a question of how can we be more love or/and compassion ?
 
I am also like Buddha, so i will answer like this..
 
Even if you are not "equipped" with the right genetical requirements of
more sensibility and love, you have to know that fear for others
and oneself also make us "care" for oneself or others , but
if you don't fear for yourself or others , so to "emulate" fear for
oneself and for others or to emulate compassion and love, like
emulation in software programming, you have to be more rational and more
disciplined and think the system like a critical system that needs
"security", so you have to be more capable, so
more "educated" to be able to set the right requirements for
security locally and globally, this needs of course more quality
and more perfection.
 
But i think also that this main point of Buddha is also the "basis" of
today psychology, i think the main point of psychology is also to permit
us to "understand" more ourselves, this means also to have more
"hindsight" and more "introspection", and after this first step,
psychology wants
also from us to be capable to make more "order" in our lives(and
"discipline" is inherent to "order" because of today constraints of
empirical world), and psychology wants from us to be able of guiding
our instincts that are more savage in the right direction, and all this
is like the main point of Buddha.
 
 
There is a smart question inherent to my previous question of:
 
How to reconcil high priority of survival and order ?
 
and it is:
 
Do we need to fear capitalism of today or fear "more" free market
internationally of today because it is not "order" ?
 
I think we have to understand the "spirit" of capitalism of today
to understand more what is happening, i think capitalism of today
is more "soften", and it ressembles a "sportive" competition,
but it can not be called a violent fight, because the actual capitalism
lives in a more appropriate "context" that constrain it to be more
respect ! because capitalism has to not ignore "Fordism", and has to not
ignore consumer confidence index that it must higher globally and
locally and this causes more respect, and high economic growth of many
countries like african countries and arab countries is more
attractive for economic investment etc. etc. and i think that this more
interconnected economies bring more peace and more stability and Fordism
has noticed it.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Dec 19 01:56PM -0800

Hello..
 
Read this:
 
 
About order and rationality..
 
As you have noticed i am a white arab, and i am a more
serious computer programmer who has invented many scalable
algorithms and there implementations, and i think
i will sell some of them to Microsoft or Intel
or Embarcadero companies.
 
Now i have come to an interesting subject about philosophy..
 
I think you know me more now..
 
Now you have also to understand my way of doing, i am
trying to find a way that permits me to "model" more efficiently
"humanity", this is why you are seeing me answering some
questions such as: From where comes a scientific mind ?
and from where comes order ?
 
Now you have to understand my way, let's for example look at me,
as you have noticed i am a more "rational" type of person that
is more technical and that is mathematics and i am
also a more wise type of person and i am a gentleman type of person,
now let us return to the basis of being more "rational" type of person,
as you are noticing since i am more rational type of person,
this more rational, in me, permit me to be more "precise" and more
"measure" and more "logic" and more "rational", and this causes that it
makes me see less rational type of persons as "inferior" thinking, so
this more rational in me permits me to be higher level of quality of
thinking, and i am not a narcissist, but a narcissist has the same
effect as he want to be superior thinking, but a narcissist has an
abnormal behavior that leads him to problems in society, look
for example at Donald Trump, he is a narcissist type of person,
but he is having problems with his behavior that we can
judge as abnormal behavior that causes problems, so
as you have noticed i am not a narcissist, because i am
a gentleman type of person, but the very basis is that
i am being a higher level of quality of thinking because
i am a more rational type of person, so this permits
us to model more correctly humanity, this is why
you have seen me writing the following:
 
About quality and about security..
 
I am more "smart", and you have to understand my work,
being more rational is not sufficient, you have
to know how to play it "safer", and i am also showing you how to be able
to "model" our humanity, and i am showing you how to be "quality" and
how to be "security", first here is what i said about being more rational:
 
I have come to an interesting subject..
 
So i was asking myself the following question:
 
From where comes a scientific mind ?
 
I think i was able to extract the architectural idea that answer this
question:
 
When you are a more rational type of person(i mean it is genetical in
you), you will for example use more logic and more measure and more
rationality, and this high level of quality of more rationality that you
have does permit you to be more "selective" of your type of culture,
because since you are more rationality, you will for example be able to
"recognize" the great importance of science and technology, so you will
start to give weights and priorities this technological and/or
scientific type of cultures, so you will start to give
a "much" higher priority to logic and to math and to philosophy or
political philosophy and to science, so since this culture is of great
importance you will choose more this type of culture, this is why this
will be reflected in your type of culture that you have. This is the
kind of person that genetically i am , i am a more rational type of
person, and i am a more wise type of person and i am a gentleman type of
person.
 
Second, but being more rational that brings quality is not sufficient,
you have also to be security, and here is what i said about security:
 
How to reconcil high priority of survival and order ?
 
This is an interesting subject of political philosophy..
 
Because even a violent ideology like nazism base its ideology
on "order" first !
 
So it is easy to see that the first very important thing is order !
 
You can not call a country a country if order is not satisfied !
 
So from wich causes we get more order ?
 
I think that order comes from the fact that we are security
for oneself and others, and what are the causes that we
are security for oneself and others ? we are security
for oneself and others for different causes, here they
are:
 
1- We are good morality that takes
care of security.
 
2- We are "sensibility" that takes care of security
 
3- We are more disciplined to take care of the system
as a critical system that needs the right requirements
for the right security both locally and globally.
 
4- We are fear that takes care of security of oneself
or others.
 
 
And this is related to my following thoughts:
 
You have to understand Buddha
 
I think the main point of Buddha is that he wanted from us
to have more "hindsight" and he wanted from us
to be capable of introspection, and he has started to discipline
his followers to be capable of guiding there instincts that
are more "savage" to the right direction. This permit us also to be
more "security" for oneself and for others, and this more security
is also like love and compassion.
 
This is why i said before:
 
If we ask a question of how can we be more love or/and compassion ?
 
I am also like Buddha, so i will answer like this..
 
Even if you are not "equipped" with the right genetical requirements of
more sensibility and love, you have to know that fear for others
and oneself also make us "care" for oneself or others , but
if you don't fear for yourself or others , so to "emulate" fear for
oneself and for others or to emulate compassion and love, like
emulation in software programming, you have to be more rational and more
disciplined and think the system like a critical system that needs
"security", so you have to be more capable, so
more "educated" to be able to set the right requirements for
security locally and globally, this needs of course more quality
and more perfection.
 
But i think also that this main point of Buddha is also the "basis" of
today psychology, i think the main point of psychology is also to permit
us to "understand" more ourselves, this means also to have more
"hindsight" and more "introspection", and after this first step,
psychology wants
also from us to be capable to make more "order" in our lives(and
"discipline" is inherent to "order" because of today constraints of
empirical world), and psychology wants from us to be able of guiding
our instincts that are more savage in the right direction, and all this
is like the main point of Buddha.
 
 
There is a smart question inherent to my previous question of:
 
How to reconcil high priority of survival and order ?
 
and it is:
 
Do we need to fear capitalism of today or fear "more" free market
internationally of today because it is not "order" ?
 
I think we have to understand the "spirit" of capitalism of today
to understand more what is happening, i think capitalism of today
is more "soften", and it ressembles a "sportive" competition,
but it can not be called a violent fight, because the actual capitalism
lives in a more appropriate "context" that constrain it to be more
respect ! because capitalism has to not ignore "Fordism", and has to not
ignore consumer confidence index that it must higher globally and
locally and this causes more respect, and high economic growth of many
countries like african countries and arab countries is more
attractive for economic investment etc. etc. and i think that this more
interconnected economies bring more peace and more stability and Fordism
has noticed it.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Dec 19 08:43PM

Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo.
Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Dec 19 08:43PM

Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo.
Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Dec 19 08:44PM

Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo.
Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Dec 19 09:25PM

Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Dec 19 12:55PM -0800

Hello..
 
 
About Universal Scalability Law..
 
As you have noticed i have implemented some enhanced programs
of Universal Scalability Law using "mathematics" and "programming" and i
have included the binary executables for x86 64 bit and 32 bit inside
the zip file, it is a "powerful" tool that i want to share with you,
please read about it in the following:
 
My Universal Scalability Law for Delphi and FreePascal was updated to
version 3.21
 
Now i have specified that:
 
Coefficient Alpha is: the contention
 
And
 
Coefficient Beta is: the coherency.
 
Contention and coherency are measured as the fraction of the sequential
execution time. A value of 0 means that there is no effect on
performance. A contention factor of 0.2, for instance, means that 20% of
the sequential execution time cannot be parallelized. A coherency factor
of 0.01 means that the time spent in the synchronization between each
pair of processes is 1% of the sequential execution time.
 
And i have included a 32 bit and 64 bit windows and linux executables
called usl.exe and usl_graph.exe inside the zip, please read the readme
file to know how to use it, it is a very powerful tool.
 
You can download and read about my Universal Scalability Law for Delphi
and FreePascal version 3.21 from:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/universal-scalability-law-for-delphi-and-freepascal
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Dec 19 12:08PM -0800

Hello..
 
More about my way of doing..
 
As you have noticed i am a white arab, i live in Quebec Canada since
year 1989.
 
Now if you ask me how i am making "money" so that to be able to live..
 
You have to understand my way of doing, I have gotten my Diploma in
Microelectronics and informatics in 1988, it is not a college level
diploma, my Diploma is a university level Diploma, it looks like an
Associate degree or the french DEUG.
 
Read here about the Associate degree:
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Associate_degree
 
And after i have gotten my Diploma , I have also succeeded one year of
pure 'mathematics" at the university level of mathematics.
 
So i have studied and succeeded 3 years at the university level..
 
Now after that i have come to Canada in year 1989 and i have
started to study more software computing and to study network
administration in Quebec Canada, and after that i have started to work
as a network administrator for many years, after that around years 2001
and 2002 i have started to implement some of my softwares like PerlZip
that looked like PkZip of PKware software company, but i have
implemented it for Perl , and i have implemented the Dynamic Link
Libraries of my PerlZip that permits to compress and decompress etc.
with the "Delphi" compiler, so my PerlZip software product was very fast
and very efficient, in year 2002 i have posted the Beta version on
internet, and as a proof , please read about it here:
 
http://computer-programming-forum.com/52-perl-modules/ea157f4a229fc720.htm
 
And after that i have sold the release version of my PerlZip
product to many many companies and to many individuals around the world,
and i have even sold it to many Banks in Europe, and with that i have
made more money.
 
And after that i have started to work like a software developer
consultant, the name of my company was and is CyberNT Communications,
here it is:
 
Here is my company in Quebec(Canada) called CyberNT Communications,
i have worked as a software developer and as a network administrator,
read the proof here:
 
https://opencorporates.com/companies/ca_qc/2246777231
 
 
And more about the moral contract..
 
As you have noticed i am a white arab and i just written and posted here
a new poem, i have also posted other of my poems , hope you have liked
them, other than that you have to understand more my way of doing, i
think that building the moral "contract" between me and others is
something important, how do you think i am building it? my moral
contract with others
is like creating one of my "jobs" that has as a goal to convince
the others that i am "useful" to society, not only that but i have
to be "usefulness" that is more "sophisticated", so this is why
you have seen me writing and posting in front of you my "poems",
those poems have as a goal to show to others that i am capable
of writing beautiful poems, so you are noticing my philosophy by reading
my poems, i mean that showing that you are capable of writing beautiful
poems is also my philosophy of life that has as a goal to build
"confidence" between me and the others, since
this confidence that i am building is also like a "glue" that connects
me to others, so confidence is really important ! not only that
but my moral contract that i am building has also as a goal to show
that i am "useful" for the society, not only that but
i want also to show that i am more "smart" and that i am more
"sophisticated" !
this is all part of my moral contract between me and you that i am
building, so as you are noticing i am in accordance with my words
and i am more in accordance with morality that is perfection at best
(as i have proved it), so as you are noticing that this perfection that
we have to be is guided by the today "context" of the society and
the context of our world, and by observing this "context" we
notice that it needs more efficiency and more sophistication
and more professionalism to be capable of "surviving" better and
to be able to "transcend" our living conditions, so this
is why i am not only writing beautiful poems and posting them here,
but i am showing that i am more "professionalism" that is more
technical, since i am a more serious computer programmer that
has invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations,
look for example at my Parallel C++ Conjugate Gradient Linear
System Solver Library that scales very well here:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-parallel-c-conjugate-gradient-linear-system-solver-library
 
As you have noticed it says the following:
 
"Sparse linear system solvers are ubiquitous in high performance
computing (HPC) and often are the most computational intensive parts in
scientific computing codes etc."
 
This is why i have "invented" my Scalable Parallel C++ Conjugate
Gradient Linear System Solver Library.
 
Here is another scalable algorithm that i have "invented",
read about it and download it from my website here:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references
 
So as you are noticing i have "invented" many scalable algorithms
and there implementations, and you will find some of them here on my
website here:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/
 
There are other scalable algorithms and there implementations that i
have also invented and that i will sell to the following software
companies: Microsoft or to Google or to Embarcadero or to Intel.
 
So as you are noticing "inventing" many scalable algorithms as i am
doing is also building the moral contract between me and you and it is
also like creating one of my jobs.
 
Read the rest of my thought to understand better:
 
More political philosophy now..
 
Why do you think i am here to talk to you ?
 
I am a white arab who is building the moral contract between me
and you so that to bring "confidence" ! and i have talked about it
in some parts of my political philosophy ! so i think
that by reading my political philosophy you are feeling
more what is the essence of morality ! i love it this way because
it is responsability that brings more efficiency that is needed by our
democracy ! so all in all as you are noticing i am here to be
responsable ! now what about the moral contract ? step by step
i am building and explaining my political philosophy to you,
my moral contract with you is that i have also to explain that
there is a necessary requirement for me, is that i have to know
how to play it smartly like playing smartly a game of chess !
and when you are more smart you will have the tendency to
know more quickly what is the best way to maximize your success !
this is why you are seeing me talking about the best way to
maximize success ! for example you have to know that to be
more smart you have to be able in morality to define what is the right
"imperfections" that give you the right perfection ! you see ? that's
very important to know ! because i am a more serious computer programmer
and imperfections like "failing" to be able to be a success is part
of a more serious computer programming ! if you are like a "purist" that
doesn't want to fail at all in computer programming , that's not
efficient ! this is the deficiency of neo-nazism and white
supremacism ! they have to know how to be imperfections(it is like being
failures) so that to be successful ! but neo-nazism and white
supremacism are more like racial "purism" and this purism is inefficient as
is inefficient socialism ! other than that we are today more efficient
than before ! and democracy is more efficient than before because
people are more educated and more experienced today and more aware today
than before !
so they are becoming more efficient and this render democracy more
efficient ! but can we ask ourselves the following question: is populism
of today not in accordance with the fact that
we are becoming more efficient ? i don't think this is a logical
contradiction because democracy is adapting quickly to the realities
and to the necessities of today ! and populism is also becoming
more aware of all the advantages of globalization(see the study
below that talks about it), so i think that democracy is
getting more and more efficient because of that ! also
i think that people are becoming more aware of the necessities
that the legislative branch or power of the government has to know how
to be moderation to avoid extremism that hurts the system ! this is
getting better and better , so we have to be positive about politics !
and i think that even Donald Trump is adapting more quickly to the
necessities of today. So all in all i think that
you are understanding better my political philosophy, so
read my following thoughts to understand better:
 
The contrast of diversity..
 
I think that neo-nazism and white supremacism have a necessary
requirement that is "order", also they want to be the right
responsability because they want to be a "level" of perfection that is
the right perfection for them, i am a white arab and i understand there
requirements, but the problem with there philosophy is that it has
difficiencies that must be corrected, first since i have proved that
morality is perfection at best, and it is inherent to perfection at best
that it must respect a certain decency and responsability that our
civilization must be an "effort" that avoids at best "savagery", also
we notice that the essence of our democracy is that we have
to know how to be "moderation" in the legislative power so that to
avoid extremism that causes violence and that hurts the system and that
can cause a civil war, so i think that white supremacism and neo-nazism
are constrained by the actual realities of politics and the necessities
of today that i think don't accept neo-nazism and white supremacism
because they are too much risk and they are too dangerous for the
system, also i have noticed that neo-nazism and white supremacism are
racial "purism" that is not what we call efficiency , because i have
explained that optimization of today is "prioritizing" to be able to be
successful, so if you look at the necessities of immigration of
today is that with immigration we want to improve productivity and want
to improve economic growth and want to improve the social system
and also because of the low birth rate of many western countries,
so i don't think that racial purism of neo=nazism and white supremacism
is in accordance with morality that is perfection at best as
i have proved it, also neo-nazism and white supremacism
have the tendency to easily be hateful towards immigrants, but i don't
think that this is the right way, because i think that we have first to
be the right intellectual effort and be correct realism that permit us
to be awareness and that permit us to be capable to think correctly and
be capable of
solving problems, and i don't think that it is the case of neo-nazism
and white supremacism, so i think that neo-nazism and white supremacism
have to be reformed to be in accordance with the right efficiency.
 
 
And I have just released the new version of my Parallel archiver and
my Parallel Compression Library, and the Zstandard Dynamic Link
Libraries for Windows and the Zstandard Shared Libraries for Linux were
updated to the newer versions.
 
You can download them from:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/parallel-archiver
 
And from:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/parallel-compression-library
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Dec 19 11:53AM -0800

Hello...
 
 
About memory models and sequential consistency:
 
As you have noticed i am working with x86 architecture..
 
Even though x86 gives up on sequential consistency, it's among the most
well-behaved architectures in terms of the crazy behaviors it allows.
Most other architectures implement even weaker memory models.
 
ARM memory model is notoriously underspecified, but is essentially a
form of weak ordering, which provides very few guarantees. Weak ordering
allows almost any operation to be reordered, which enables a variety of
hardware optimizations but is also a nightmare to program at the lowest
levels.
 
Read more here:
 
https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~bornholt/post/memory-models.html
 
 
Memory Models: x86 is TSO, TSO is Good
 
Essentially, the conclusion is that x86 in practice implements the old
SPARC TSO memory model.
 
The big take-away from the talk for me is that it confirms the
observation made may times before that SPARC TSO seems to be the optimal
memory model. It is sufficiently understandable that programmers can
write correct code without having barriers everywhere. It is
sufficiently weak that you can build fast hardware implementation that
can scale to big machines.
 
Read more here:
 
https://jakob.engbloms.se/archives/1435
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Dec 19 11:39AM -0800

Hello,
 
Read this:
 
 
Why Linus Torvalds Prefers x86 Over ARM:
 
Read more here:
 
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/16/10/09/0755231/why-linus-torvalds-prefers-x86-over-arm
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)