- [Modération JNTP] Annulation de <pu93kq$1tk$2@dont-email.me> - 5 Updates
- About quality and about security.. - 2 Updates
- Read all my following post about economy.. - 1 Update
- MIT AI: Google (Eric Schmidt) - 1 Update
- Philosophy about philosophy.. - 1 Update
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Dec 05 06:07PM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Dec 05 08:27PM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Dec 06 11:01AM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Dec 06 11:01AM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Dec 06 11:01AM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Dec 05 02:54PM -0800 Hello, About quality and about security.. I am more "smart", and you have to understand my work, being more rational is not sufficient, you have to know how to play it "safer", and i am also showing you how to be able to "model" our humanity, and i am showing you how to be "quality" and how to be "security", first here is what i said about being more rational: I have come to an interesting subject.. So i was asking myself the following question: From where comes a scientific mind ? I think i was able to extract the architectural idea that answer this question: When you are a more rational type of person(i mean it is genetical in you), you will for example use more logic and more measure and more rationality, and this high level of quality of more rationality that you have does permit you to be more "selective" of your type of culture, because since you are more rationality, you will for example be able to "recognize" the great importance of science and technology, so you will start to give weights and priorities this technological and/or scientific type of cultures, so you will start to give a "much" higher priority to logic and to math and to philosophy or political philosophy and to science, so since this culture is of great importance you will choose more this type of culture, this is why this will be reflected in your type of culture that you have. This is the kind of person that genetically i am , i am a more rational type of person, and i am a more wise type of person and i am a gentleman type of person. Second, but being more rational that brings quality is not sufficient, you have also to be security, and here is what i said about security: How to reconcil high priority of survival and order ? This is an interesting subject of political philosophy.. Because even a violent ideology like nazism base its ideology on "order" first ! So it is easy to see that the first very important thing is order ! You can not call a country a country if order is not satisfied ! So from wich causes we get more order ? I think that order comes from the fact that we are security for oneself and others, and what are the causes that we are security for oneself and others ? we are security for oneself and others for different causes, here they are: 1- We are good morality that takes care of security. 2- We are "sensibility" that takes care of security 3- We are more disciplined to take care of the system as a critical system that needs the right requirements for the right security both locally and globally. 4- We are fear that takes care of security of oneself or others. And this is related to my following thoughts: You have to understand Buddha I think the main point of Buddha is that he wanted from us to have more "hindsight" and he wanted from us to be capable of introspection, and he has started to discipline his followers to be capable of guiding there instincts that are more "savage" to the right direction. This permit us also to be more "security" for oneself and for others, and this more security is also like love and compassion. This is why i said before: If we ask a question of how can we be more love or/and compassion ? I am also like Buddha, so i will answer like this.. Even if you are not "equipped" with the right genetical requirements of more sensibility and love, you have to know that fear for others and oneself also make us "care" for oneself or others , but if you don't fear for yourself or others , so to "emulate" fear for oneself and for others or to emulate compassion and love, like emulation in software programming, you have to be more rational and more disciplined and think the system like a critical system that needs "security", so you have to be more capable, so more "educated" to be able to set the right requirements for security locally and globally, this needs of course more quality and more perfection. But i think also that this main point of Buddha is also the "basis" of today psychology, i think the main point of psychology is also to permit us to "understand" more ourselves, this means also to have more "hindsight" and more "introspection", and after this first step, psychology wants also from us to be capable to make more "order" in our lives(and "discipline" is inherent to "order" because of today constraints of empirical world), and psychology wants from us to be able of guiding our instincts that are more savage in the right direction, and all this is like the main point of Buddha. There is a smart question inherent to my previous question of: How to reconcil high priority of survival and order ? and it is: Do we need to fear capitalism of today or fear "more" free market internationally of today because it is not "order" ? I think we have to understand the "spirit" of capitalism of today to understand more what is happening, i think capitalism of today is more "soften", and it ressembles a "sportive" competition, but it can not be called a violent fight, because the actual capitalism lives in a more appropriate "context" that constrain it to be more respect ! because capitalism has to not ignore "Fordism", and has to not ignore consumer confidence index that it must higher globally and locally and this causes more respect, and high economic growth of many countries like african countries and arab countries is more attractive for economic investment etc. etc. and i think that this more interconnected economies bring more peace and more stability and Fordism has noticed it. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Dec 05 03:20PM -0800 Hello... I am more smart, and you will ask why i have not included economy etc. in the following: I think that order comes from the fact that we are security for oneself and others, and what are the causes that we are security for oneself and others ? we are security for oneself and others for different causes, here they are: 1- We are good morality that takes care of security. 2- We are "sensibility" that takes care of security 3- We are more disciplined to take care of the system as a critical system that needs the right requirements for the right security both locally and globally. 4- We are fear that takes care of security of oneself or others. Because when i say: We are good morality that takes care of security, i have proved in my previous post that morality is perfection at best, so it is "inherent" to saying, We are good morality that takes care of security, that it must be like a decent perfection that doesn't cause desorder, so i think that my above answer is correct. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane./ |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Dec 05 01:48PM -0800 Hello, Read this: Read all my following post about economy.. About Russia's economy... Read this: Why Switzerland was ranked the most economically free nation in Europe ? The important characteristics of Switzerland are: 1. Rule of law 2. Optimization of the Government size 3. Regulatory efficiency 4. Open markets Read more here: https://lenews.ch/2016/02/03/why-switzerland-was-ranked-the-most-economically-free-nation-in-europe/ So now about "Russia", Russia lacks many of the requirements for strong economy, read the following to notice it: "Russia's transition from a centrally planned economy to a more market-based system has stalled, and the country remains predominantly statist. Further economic reforms have been subordinated to the imperatives of political stability and government longevity. The private sector has been marginalized by structural and institutional constraints caused by ever-growing government encroachment into the marketplace. Large state-owned institutions and an inefficient public sector dominate the economy. The judiciary is vulnerable to corruption, and weak protection of property rights undermines prospects for optimal long-term economic development." Read more here: https://www.heritage.org/index/country/russia I think China is having a problem, it is not the trade war, it is the fact that it has done huge investments abroad, and many of those investments abroad are "inefficient" investments , they are bad investment, so it is causing to China more and more debt, and with this China is taking too much "risk" can become "dangerous" for China, here is the proof of that, look at this interesting video: Is Xi Jinping HOLDING BACK Chinese EXPANSION? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raooYdCh7vY And by analogy, because it is a risk that is dangerous, this risk that is dangerous look like the following risk when i said: == I said: "At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which it leads to economic growth and more investment which is beneficial for growth , except that monetary policy has a weakness if the borrowers are too much at risk of bankruptcy as was also the case in the united states in the crisis of year 2000. " Here is the proof, read the following: In 2001, when the recession hit the US economy, the Fed lowered the federal funds rate, increasing the liquidity in the economy. The borrowers were mainly those without jobs and income to back these loans, to buy houses. The easy credit plus upward spiral of home prices, made investments in high-yielding subprime mortgages increase further. Read more here: Reasons For The Late 2000s Financial Crisis https://themarketmogul.com/reasons-for-the-late-2000s-financial-crisis/ == Still about economy and quality.. Why Doesn't DUBAI care about OIL? Dubai has done the following to diversify and make successful its economy and become rich: - Lower taxes - Special economic zones - High degree of immigration freedom - It has attracted more investment Look at this video to know more about DUBAI: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEs1uOzt3KM Still about quality As you have noticed growth in France will lower the unemployment in a significant way, but consumption is also a way in economics to lower unemployment more, but there is also another way to reduce unemployment is also to build quality products and services like in Germany to be more competitive and sell more locally and sell more globally to other countries, so I think France must also pay attention to the education sector that should become more efficient and of a better quality, because innovation and quality are dependent on it! and in being more effective in economy and education France will attract more and more smart people who innovate more and who create quality and growth, but I think that France is better "aware" today to face its challenges and I think it is able to meet them. Also I think that we have not to be pessimistic about France, because look at its growth and look at its other economic indicators: First look at the growth of France here: "Today's growth remains lower than the one that prevailed during the period 1975-2007, with a rate of 2.1% per year on average," observes Yannick L'Horty, a professor at the university. Paris-East - Marne-la-Vallée. However, it helps to increase the number of employees in the private sector, "so that unemployment will probably start to decline, at a very measured pace . " and look also at this about France: According to Bpifrance's semi-annual business survey, published on Monday, 41% of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) report recruitment difficulties, an increase of seven points over a year. This indicator has never been higher since 2002. This situation reflects the inadequacy of supply and demand for employment. The government wants to remedy this , through its Skills Investment Plan (CIP), which plans to train by the year 2022 two million low-skilled people or remote from the world of work. But, as Mr. Martin points out, this program "has not yet produced its effects" since it is still in its infancy. Read more here to notice it: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lemonde.fr%2Femploi%2Farticle%2F2018%2F07%2F25%2Fle-nombre-de-chomeurs-a-augmente-de-0-1-au-second-trimestre-2018_5335727_1698637.html So i think France is on the right path, and France must also balance the budget. Also here is my other thoughts of what France can also do: I observed more closely the model of for example the French system, and I found that contrarily to England, for example the weight of the public service in France is much more than that of England, so what can we also do in France to unlock economic growth and reduce the rate of unemployment? i think there is another solution that is reduce the size of the state to increase public revenue too, and also "reduce" taxes, because it is agreed that a lower taxes mechanically stimulates growth by the effect of the "multiplier "tax effect": indeed, it results in an increase in households or corporate profits, which favors consumption and/or investment, and therefore, indirectly, the production and employment, so it reduces unemployment. I have to be more precise about USA: I said before on my previous post that: "At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which it leads to economic growth and more investment which is beneficial for growth , except that monetary policy has a weakness if the borrowers are too much at risk of bankruptcy as was also the case in the united states in the crisis of year 2000. " Here is the proof, read the following: In 2001, when the recession hit the US economy, the Fed lowered the federal funds rate, increasing the liquidity in the economy. The borrowers were mainly those without jobs and income to back these loans, to buy houses. The easy credit plus upward spiral of home prices, made investments in high-yielding subprime mortgages increase further. Read more here: Reasons For The Late 2000s Financial Crisis https://themarketmogul.com/reasons-for-the-late-2000s-financial-crisis/ So reread my following thoughts: About offshoring and immigration and macroeconomics.. I am a white Arab, and here is my questions and my answers about offshoring and immigration and macroeconomics, read my following thoughts: Questions: What do i think about offshoring and macroeconomics? Answer: At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which it leads to economic growth and more investment which is beneficial for growth , except that monetary policy has a weakness if the borrowers are too much at risk of bankruptcy as was also the case in the united states in the crisis of year 2000. Also the second lever is the Keynes tax policy: Keynes recommends using an expansionary fiscal policy in case recession: reduce taxes and increase the state. In case of inflation, he recommends doing the opposite. The other criticism I make on the far right political parties, is that the far right makes us think offshoring as being just bad, but I do not agree with them, because read the following: Offshoring increases demand for more workers "qualified" and also have a significant positive effect on productivity, in Canada it is an increase in the "productivity" of order of about 10%, also according to some recent research the Offshoring of materials and services have both a positive and not negligible effect on productivity. When it comes to the repercussion on employment, the majority of empirical studies suggest that the general repercussions of offshoring on the employment levels are low (Amiti and Wei 2005, Mankiw and Swagel 2006). For proof, read the following document: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww150.statcan.gc.ca%2Fn1%2Fpub%2F11f0027m%2F2008055%2Fs6-fra.htm And about immigration now: Look at this following video about: Why Does the USA Need More IMMIGRANTS? You will notice that the West "needs" immigrants because they are also good for economic "growth". But please look carefully at the following video to understand more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmRgnDrhE9o Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Dec 05 12:12PM -0800 Hello... Please look at this interesting video: MIT AI: Google (Eric Schmidt) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIC9FQpxVwQ Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Dec 05 09:58AM -0800 Hello, Philosophy about philosophy.. You will notice that i am more smart, because you have to understand my way of doing political philosophy, so i will ask the following question that will permit us ti understand more my way of doing political philosophy: Why are we doing political philosophy? This type of question gives rise to something similar to human Metathought, it is philosophy about philosophy, but how can we address this problem of why are we doing political philosophy, i think that by reading my political philosophy you will notice that i am more smart because political philosophy is part of morality that is perfection at best as i have proved it(read about it below), and you will notice that this abstraction of my definition of morality is also correct, but you have to define more the "at best" of perfection at best that is morality, and now you will notice that it is the basis of political philosophy, it is also about how to make "safer" morality, it is also about "security", and this permits us to know more about political philosophy, because as you will notice that "democracy" and what we call the separation of powers in the USA system and other systems all are today part of morality, this is a very important part of morality ! and this democracy and separation of powers forces us more to be more moderation to avoid extremism that hurts the system and this is also one of the most important parts of morality that permits morality to be more safer today, this is why i will invite you to read all my following thoughts to understand more my political philosophy: Philosophy about science... I have come to an interesting subject.. So i was asking myself the following question: From where comes a scientific mind ? I have been able to extract the architectural idea that answer this question: When you are a more rational type of person(i mean it is genetical in you), you will for example use more logic and more measure and more rationality, and this high level of quality of more rationality that you have does permit you to be more "selective" of your type of culture, because since you are more rationality, you will for example be able to "recognize" the great importance of science and technology, so you will start to give weights and priorities this technological and/or scientific type of cultures, so you will start to give a "much" higher priority to logic and to math and to philosophy or political philosophy and to science, so since this culture is of great importance you will choose more this type of culture, this is why this will be reflected in your type of culture that you have. This is the kind of person that genetically i am , i am a more rational type of person, and i am a more wise type of person and i am a gentleman type of person. And please read my following thoughts, i have corrected a last typo in them: About nihilism and such ideologies.. I am a white arab, and i am a more "wise" type of person, and i am a gentleman kind of person, so i am more capable at thinking political philosophy, and now i am coming to a very interesting subject.. As you are noticing today that people can become more violent when they don't understand what is morality and when they don't understand political philosophy, i will give you more of my wisdom to understand me more: What do you think is also morality ? I have proved that morality is perfection at best, i think that this definition is also correct because it shows that morality has also to be perfectioning and to be correct efficiency so that to be able to be successful ! but you have to be able to see more correctly morality ! morality is not absolute perfection yet ! because morality of today is constructing perfection by also needing "imperfections" to be able to be the right perfection ! this is how you have to be mature in political philosophy ! because if you say that imperfections that are needed by morality so that to be more efficient are not morality and you start to hate our world and be violent with our world because of those imperfections that are needed by morality to be more efficient , so it is like a kind of "nihilism" ! and i think this is "immaturity" of morality ! look for example at neo-nazism , it is not accepting imperfections of others that are needed by morality of today so that to be the right perfection ! so they are not understanding the "game" of morality of today ! i am not being pessimistic ! because morality of today is accepting a certain level of imperfections so that to be the right perfection and so that to be more efficient ! and this is what we call maturity of morality that is perfection at best ! also we have not to be pessimistic about morality that is perfection at best , because i have defined more what is the "at best" of perfection at best so that you understand more correctly what is morality of today and what is morality. So read the rest of my thoughts to understand better: About political philosophy.. As you have noticed i am a white arab, i am not like religious man, i want to do political philosophy to explain my ideas and my architectural ideas, this is why you have seen me writing here about political philosophy, now i have come to an interesting subject of today, here it is: We have to understand the requirements to be able to do political philosophy.. I think political philosophy must use a "methodology" to be more successful ! For example in political philosophy you will start by thinking about sufficiency and reliability and efficiency and robustness and flexibility and Security. I give you an example to understand me more: You can somewhat higher "flexibility" and this can somewhat lower "reliability", and this can be "acceptable" if we start by giving weights or priorities to processes or things.. i give you another example to understand more: let say arabs like me(i am not religious , and i am speaking about arabs that are not religious), we can say that eventhough arabs are overall less beautiful than white europeans, we are bringing arab immigrants because it is good for productivity or/and economy or/and the social system or/and the system, so we are giving much higher priority to this facts than the fact of being as beautiful as white europeans, so this is like somewhat highering flexibility and this is somewhat lowering reliability and this causes that we are being more efficient. So now you are understanding more political philosophy, that you have to be capable to "prioritize" to be able to be successful, and you have to understand that political philosophy is also understanding what is morality that is perfection at best and you have to be able to define the "at best" of perfection at best to be successful, and from here you will understand that you have to be the right "diversity" that brings the right perfection, also in political philosophy you have to be able to extract the architectural ideas that are important and necessary for our political philosophy, and here again read my following thoughts to understand better how i am doing it: About wisdom and love.. Political philosophy is something really important, but why am i doing political philosophy ? i am doing it to be able to "extract" the "architectural" ideas that are the way to follow and that permit us to walk in the right direction, you have to be more "serious" about political philosophy, but how am i extracting those architectural ideas? it is like wisdom and more smartness in action ! and here again there is something really important to notice, and it is: you will notice that my writing is like wisdom , because wisdom is more important to be able to govern, because with wisdom you are being a higher quality that is more appropriate to be able to govern ! and why i am making this "distinction" between wisdom and love ? first because wisdom of today is like balancing the good and the bad to be able to be the right perfection, so this makes wisdom superior to love or compassion, and second, it is because it is related to morality that is perfection at best as i have proved it, because when you are more naive you will think that since morality is like perfection so morality is like "mathematics" or like "efficiency" or it is like a "maximization" of perfection, so it is like a "corruption" of morality since this can become dangerous, but i think that this thinking is "inferiority" that doesn't understand correctly morality of today, and to be able to understand morality you have to be superiority of wisdom , because morality is perfection at best , and you have to understand more what is the "at best" of perfection at best to be able to be more optimistic about morality of today, this is why you have to read my following thoughts: I am a white arab that is more wise, so you have to understand my way of doing.. What about USA ? You have to be smart, i don't think Donald Trump is a white supremacist or a neo-nazi, because you have to understand more Donald Trump, Donald Trump wants also "fairness", you will say that when Donald Trump says that he wants USA to be great again that's not like fairness, but i think that you are wrong because Donald Trump wants USA to be great again and at the same time USA is allowing China (and others) to be more competitive and to become great ! so thinking of Donald Trump is like fairness thinking towards China and others ! this is why he has got into trade war with China, because China was not more "fairness" because it has not allowed full access to its Market etc. so China was too much "protectionism", this is why Donald Trump is getting into a trade war with China to force China to be more fairness, now you know me more that i am not hating USA because it is an easy process that is not correct thinking, because also hating our world is an easy process that is not correct thinking ! because it is immaturity ! so we have to know how to manage ourselves by first becoming more efficient locally inside a country and globally around the world ! because you have to understand me more, i am more "realism" and more "pragmatism" because i am seeing that USA is also more fairness and efficiency by coming and investing in Morocco my arab country, and you will ask what are USA investing in Morocco ? read this and my writing follows: I am a white arab from Moroco, here is US Companies Operating in Morocco: http://heymorocco.com/american-companies-in-morocco.aspx I think DXC Technology was not on the list, here it is: Look at the following video about DXC Technology in Morocco: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZ_MyKQ-250 Read about DXC Technology here: http://www.dxc.technology/ So as you are noticing USA is also understanding that we have to know how to work together to be more efficient ! this is why it is working and investing in other countries such as Morocco ! So i think we have to be more optimistic about USA.. And about wisdom... You have to understand my writing.. By what are you able to judge wisdom ? By wisdom in itself ! So you have to be capable of choosing the right wisdom to be able to govern, so you have to be able to be "high" quality that is the right security that is able to choose the right wisdom. But what is wisdom ? I said below that wisdom of today is like being moderation, because wisdom of today has to balance the bad and the good so that to be able to be the right perfection of perfection at best that is morality, so is wisdom corruption of morality ? if you are naive you will say that since it is not good to balance the bad and good, so it is not morality, but this is "immaturity", because you have to understand what is morality and what is it to be "decent" morality today to be able to decide, so read my writing below to understand more about what is decent morality today and what is morality: Read the rest of my thoughts to understand better: About diversity... I said in my previous poem the following: "Our silence cry patience And our hearts cries love and justice Like the blue sky Like the heartbeat of pretty birds Since we hear the pretty song of the nightingales And the oasis of the desert tells us about wisdom Its wisdom that defies the tourmants of the desert So we walk towards the light Like a Rainbow Because my story is multicolored So I go back to my multicolored land Because diversity is also wisdom" So notice with me that i want to show that "diversity" is important by saying also the following: "Because diversity is also wisdom" And as you have noticed that there is wisdom and there is love.. So is wisdom love or not ? or is wisdom "corruption" of morality ? We have to be capable of political philosophy to understand "wisdom", wisdom of today is also like a "moderation" that permits the society and the world to avoid desorder and destruction(read my writing below about morality to understand better) ! wisdom is something really important, because when you say "love", it is "inherent" to love that it is not capable to be a way of governing ! so we have to choose a more appropriate way of governing ! and i think that wisdom is also the way, but you have to be capable of political philosophy to notice that wisdom can not be in contradiction with morality that is perfection at best, but do we have to be pessismistic about morality? i think that we have to be more optimistic because i have explained more what must be the "at best" of perfection at best that is morality, please read what's following to understand more what is morality ! I will do more political philosophy, please read all my following thoughts to understand better my thoughts: I think "Flexibility" is also something really important in politics and management, because nationalism and communism come with some deficiencies because they lack flexibility, for example communism still uses Class Struggle that is too violent and that can bring war and destruction to our humanity, and neo-nazism also uses Racial Struggle that is too violent that can bring war and destruction to humanity, and nationalism also use National Struggle against the others , but the problem of nationalism is that nationalism of today lacks flexibility too because it is too much nationalism that is not in accordance with a correct pragmatism or correct realism, nationalism of today is by analogy as if you are too individualistic, i mean that nationalism of today is not correct "efficiency", because also nationalism of today, like the one that resulted from populism, comes from "fear" of Globalization without being correct pragmatism and correct efficiency, and i think that's also lacking of flexibility, because we have to know more about Globalization, i mean that you have to know how to transcend your living conditions by being more educated and more skilled and more efficient and more aware ! this is why i am here to bring my own thoughts, and this is why i am speaking about how we have today to get more efficient by working with others globally , not just locally inside a country, and this is why i said that neo-nazism and white supremacism lack flexibility too that is needed by efficiency(read below my writing about neo-nazism and immigration to notice it), now what about Globalization? read what's follow about Globalization and you will understand more: About globalization.. About populism.. I think that populism of USA that has also elected Donald Trump, and other populism around the world, are like Class |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment