| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Dec 20 04:44PM -0800 Hello, Read again, i correct about more of my philosophy about the "assets" of the central Bank of European Union and more.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I have just looked at the following video of Olivier Berruyer , born on October 26 , 1975 in Bron that is a French blogger and actuary by profession, and you can read about him more here: https://fr-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Olivier_Berruyer?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en And here is the video of him: NOTRE SYSTÈME FINANCIER VA S'EFFONDRER https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BknDh30qnTI So i think i am smart and i will say that Olivier Berruyer the actuary by profession in the above video is not so smart, since he is for example giving a graphic of the "assets" of the central Bank of European Union between years 1999 and 2021, and he is also explaining why it is problematic and he is also saying that the negative interest rate of the central Bank of European Union is something really problematic and that it must not be so, but i think that he is not so smart, since you can look at the graphic in the above video of the "assets" of the central of the Bank of European Union between years 1999 and 2021, and you can notice that it is not so problematic, since the time where this fast growth has happened is not too long and he is not saying that the very important thing to know is that this fast growth of the assets of central Bank of European Union also "coincides" with the crisis of Covid-19 and we have to know that negative interest rates are typically seen during weak economies and/or periods of deflation such as in period of the crisis of Covid-19, and you can read that even in Canada there can also be negative interest rates, read here so that to notice it: What would negative interest rates mean for Canadians? https://financialpost.com/moneywise/what-would-negative-interest-rates-mean-for-canadians-3 And it is also related to my following thoughts: And here is also how i have just explained why the governments of Europe and USA are "spending" more in the economy and are following the Keynesian economics in this period of economic Crisis of Covid-19: More of my philosophy about the Keynesian economics and more.. I invite you to look at the following new video about how the governments of Europe and USA are "spending" more in the economy and are following the Keynesian economics in this period of economic Crisis of Covid-19, since i think that Keynesian economics even if not followed all the time, has still its "advantage" in this kind of economic crisis, and the macroeconomic theories and models of Keynesian economics is about how aggregate demand (total spending in the economy) strongly influences economic output and inflations, so i invite you to look at the following new video so that to understand the how of it: The EU's New Plan to Transform the Economy - VisualPolitik EN https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2-HqLZJIhU More of my philosophy about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and about my philosophy.. You have to understand my contributions as a philosopher by reading my philosophy, but one of my contribution of my philosophy is also related to the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, since the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche articulated ethical dilemma as a tension between the master vs. slave morality; the former in which we make decisions based on the assessment of consequences, and the latter in which we make decisions based on our conception of good vs. evil, but you have to understand my contribution of my philosophy about morality, since the first of my contribution about morality is that i am giving a kind of logical proof that morality is "universal", but not only that but i have invented quickly a proverb that abstract much more correctly morality so that you understand more, so read it below, so i think from my thoughts below of my contribution to philosophy, that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not so smart, since you will understand from my thoughts below of my philosophy that morality of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is an Elitist morality called in his philosophy the morality of the master, but notice that he is not so smart, since the morality of the master in his philosophy has the "tendency" to be great "performance" of perfection, so this is why it can be morality that oppresses people, so we can then say that morality of philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is the not correct morality, since here again you are noticing that Democracy is a tool that permit to avoid such oppression of the morality of the master of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, so i invite you to read again some of my contributions to philosophy about morality in my following thoughts, but first i invite you to read my following thoughts of my philosophy about Utilitrianism so that to understand more that morality of the master of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not the correct one: More of my philosophy about Democracy and Utilitarianism and more.. I think i am a wise type of person, and i will also make you understand another very important thing, and it is that my redefinition of Utilitarianism below make the rule of Utilitarianism "valid" and "true", since the rule of Utilitarianism that is maximizing happiness and well-being for all affected individuals is also ruled by the future consequences, so since our future consequences must be that we have to be a kind of order in a Democracy that permits Democracy to work, so then we have to "introduce" like a kind of randomness such by logical analogy as randomness of Evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence, since to not get stuck in a local minimum we have to not to "homogenize" in the society the rule of Utilitarianism since there is also the weakest members of the society that can not be able to be this maximizing happiness and well-being for all affected individuals, so i think that it is like evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence, so we have to be smart when managing and ruling in Democracy. So notice that i have first talked in my below thoughts about the definition of Utilitarianism that doesn't take into account my redefinition below of Utilitarianism that make the rule of Utilitarianism "valid" and "true", and i am after that giving my redefinition of Utilitarianism, so read it again: More of my philosophy about Utilitarianism and more.. So as you are noticing that in my previous post i have talked about what is the best positive energy that make us a much better world, read it below, but am i for Utilitarianism 100% by talking as i am talking about this positive energy ? i will answer that you have to know that Utilitarianism prescribes actions that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals, so i think this "prescribes" means like "recommend", since we are also ruled by Democracy that makes the rule of Utilitarianism compatible with Democracy, so this prescribes is not dictatorship, and this maximize of Utilitarianism is the best way, and you have to also understand my redefinition of Utilitarianism that abstract much more correctly, and here is my redefinition of Utilitarianism: More of my philosophy about why the definition of Utilitarianism is like an IQ test.. Notice that i think i am smart, since when i just looked rapidly at the definition below of Utilitarianism, i have rapidly discovered a pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is that even if the definition of Utilitarianism is: That Utilitarianism prescribes actions that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals, i can easily see a pattern with my fluid intelligence since i am smart, since the pattern is that Utilitarianism maximises happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not only the present but also the future, i mean that responability is inherent to the definition since the well balancing forces us to be responsability in the present or today so that to maximize correctly happiness and well being tomorrow or in the future. I can give you another IQ test that i have rapidly invented and here it is: So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid intelligence that permits to understand, here it is: So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ? It is like my IQ test.. So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be "reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan. More precision of my philosophy about Utilitarianism.. I invite you to read the following definition of what is Utilitarianism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism So as you are noticing, it says that Utilitarianism prescribes actions that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals, but i think that Utilitarianism is not idiotic since it maximises happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not only the present but also the future. And read my following other proverbs that i think are flexible from the start and that i have just invented quickly, here they are and read them carefully: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8 And here is my contributions of my philosophy about morality: More of my philosophy about morality and more.. I think i am smart, and as you have just noticed i have also just invented a proverb that abstract morality, and i invite you to read it again, and i invite you to read my below thoughts so that you understand more my logical proof of what is morality and why it is universal: And here is my other new proverb: Note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as: "the act or process of perfecting" Read here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection This is the definition of perfection above that I use below in my explanation of my new proverb. Here is all my explanation of my new proverb below: My new proverb comes to me from the essence of morality that I explained to you in my political philosophy that I wrote in English, since in morality we are pushed towards the pretty tomorrow because we are aware of this pretty perfume that is the perfection that pushes us or encourages us to be or allows us to become perfect or greatly perfect. Read about it here on my thoughts of my political philosophy about morality: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4 So here is my new proverb: "Life is like the pretty perfume that calls us to be a pretty tomorrow!" So notice carefully my smart play on words in my new proverb, i think it's smart, and you have to know that the future perfection depends on the present perfection, so when today we are responsibility to be the pretty perfection so that to build the pretty tomorrow, then the pretty perfection of today is part of the pretty tomorrow, and the "pretty perfume" in my new proverb is also the today pretty perfection, but you have to understand the symbolic which allows us to say that being this part of the pretty tomorrow is also like being the pretty tomorrow. It is what makes it a smart proverb. More of my philosophy about entropy and about how morality is universal.. I think i am smart, and i am explaining below why morality is universal, but as you have just noticed i have just said that so that to say that morality is universal, it requires from us to know about the requirements such as why to be a global world etc., so there must be a level of consciousness, other than that i will make you feel and see much more that morality is universal since i am seeing it: So take for example the human imperfections or world imperfections, i say that it is because we have those imperfections that also we have morality, and those imperfections causes entropy(A state of disorder and disorganization), this is why we have to be more and more perfection so that to maintain order and so that to attain perfection of being much more perfect or perfect, for example humans are working in there everyday life so that to also maintain order or so that to become perfection or much more perfection, and maintaining order is also that we are perfectioning so that to not to become disorder. More of my philosophy about why morality is universal.. I think i am a smart philosopher, and i will now explain why morality is universal: So take a look at the thing that we call "time", so you can naively look at our everyday life and say that time is not relative, but you can like Einstein analyse it and prove that time is relative, and morality is the same, so when you naively look at it you will think that morality is relative, since you can notice that for example there is many countries with many laws and rules, but when you analyse it you will notice that the goal of morality that we become perfect or much more perfect pushes us forward towards more and more perfection since we have to solve our problems such as our many imperfections, it is also why morality is "progressive", so then the essence of morality become that morality is progressing towards the goal that is that we become perfect or much more perfect, so then the other details of morality are abstracted, so then those acts of humans perfectioning or perfecting towards a much more perfect world or perfect world and that are also codified as morality become that morality is universal, since also we can take this essence of morality as the most important thing. More of my philosophy about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism and more.. I think i am a wise type of person and i think i am a philosopher, and first, i invite you to read my following new thoughts about Utilitarianism and more here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/wgPJkwdGrqc And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism, so i will first ask a philosophical question of: Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ? I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also comes from the fact that we are genetically predisposed to being smart or having a good memory efficiency etc. so this gives much more "chance" to those that have this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich and successful, so this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we have to have a level of |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Dec 20 04:25PM -0800 Hello, More of my philosophy about the "assets" of the central Bank of European Union and more.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I have just looked at the following video of Olivier Berruyer , born on October 26 , 1975 in Bron that is a French blogger and actuary by profession, and you can read about him more here: https://fr-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Olivier_Berruyer?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en And here is the video of him: NOTRE SYSTÈME FINANCIER VA S'EFFONDRER https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BknDh30qnTI So i think i am smart and i will say that Olivier Berruyer the actuary by profession in the above video is not so smart, since he is for example giving a graphic of the "assets" of the central Bank of European Union between years 1999 and 2021, and he is also explaining why it is problematic and he is also saying that the negative interest rate of the central Bank of European Union is something really problematic and that it must not be so, but i think that he is not so smart, since you can look at the graphic in the above video of the "assets" of the central of the Bank of European Union between years 1999 and 2021, and you can notice that it is not so problematic, since the time where this fast growth has happened is not too long and he is not saying that the very important think to know is that this fast growth of the assets of central Bank of European Union also "coincides" with the crisis of Covid-19 and we have to know that negative interest rates are typically seen during weak economies and/or periods of deflation such as in period of the crisis of Covid-19, and you can read that even in Canada there can be also negative interest rates, read here so that to notice it: What would negative interest rates mean for Canadians? https://financialpost.com/moneywise/what-would-negative-interest-rates-mean-for-canadians-3 And it is also related to my following thoughts: And here is also how i have just explained why the governments of Europe and USA are "spending" more in the economy and are following the Keynesian economics in this period of economic Crisis of Covid-19: More of my philosophy about the Keynesian economics and more.. I invite you to look at the following new video about how the governments of Europe and USA are "spending" more in the economy and are following the Keynesian economics in this period of economic Crisis of Covid-19, since i think that Keynesian economics even if not followed all the time, has still its "advantage" in this kind of economic crisis, and the macroeconomic theories and models of Keynesian economics is about how aggregate demand (total spending in the economy) strongly influences economic output and inflations, so i invite you to look at the following new video so that to understand the how of it: The EU's New Plan to Transform the Economy - VisualPolitik EN https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2-HqLZJIhU More of my philosophy about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and about my philosophy.. You have to understand my contributions as a philosopher by reading my philosophy, but one of my contribution of my philosophy is also related to the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, since the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche articulated ethical dilemma as a tension between the master vs. slave morality; the former in which we make decisions based on the assessment of consequences, and the latter in which we make decisions based on our conception of good vs. evil, but you have to understand my contribution of my philosophy about morality, since the first of my contribution about morality is that i am giving a kind of logical proof that morality is "universal", but not only that but i have invented quickly a proverb that abstract much more correctly morality so that you understand more, so read it below, so i think from my thoughts below of my contribution to philosophy, that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not so smart, since you will understand from my thoughts below of my philosophy that morality of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is an Elitist morality called in his philosophy the morality of the master, but notice that he is not so smart, since the morality of the master in his philosophy has the "tendency" to be great "performance" of perfection, so this is why it can be morality that oppresses people, so we can then say that morality of philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is the not correct morality, since here again you are noticing that Democracy is a tool that permit to avoid such oppression of the morality of the master of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, so i invite you to read again some of my contributions to philosophy about morality in my following thoughts, but first i invite you to read my following thoughts of my philosophy about Utilitrianism so that to understand more that morality of the master of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not the correct one: More of my philosophy about Democracy and Utilitarianism and more.. I think i am a wise type of person, and i will also make you understand another very important thing, and it is that my redefinition of Utilitarianism below make the rule of Utilitarianism "valid" and "true", since the rule of Utilitarianism that is maximizing happiness and well-being for all affected individuals is also ruled by the future consequences, so since our future consequences must be that we have to be a kind of order in a Democracy that permits Democracy to work, so then we have to "introduce" like a kind of randomness such by logical analogy as randomness of Evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence, since to not get stuck in a local minimum we have to not to "homogenize" in the society the rule of Utilitarianism since there is also the weakest members of the society that can not be able to be this maximizing happiness and well-being for all affected individuals, so i think that it is like evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence, so we have to be smart when managing and ruling in Democracy. So notice that i have first talked in my below thoughts about the definition of Utilitarianism that doesn't take into account my redefinition below of Utilitarianism that make the rule of Utilitarianism "valid" and "true", and i am after that giving my redefinition of Utilitarianism, so read it again: More of my philosophy about Utilitarianism and more.. So as you are noticing that in my previous post i have talked about what is the best positive energy that make us a much better world, read it below, but am i for Utilitarianism 100% by talking as i am talking about this positive energy ? i will answer that you have to know that Utilitarianism prescribes actions that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals, so i think this "prescribes" means like "recommend", since we are also ruled by Democracy that makes the rule of Utilitarianism compatible with Democracy, so this prescribes is not dictatorship, and this maximize of Utilitarianism is the best way, and you have to also understand my redefinition of Utilitarianism that abstract much more correctly, and here is my redefinition of Utilitarianism: More of my philosophy about why the definition of Utilitarianism is like an IQ test.. Notice that i think i am smart, since when i just looked rapidly at the definition below of Utilitarianism, i have rapidly discovered a pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is that even if the definition of Utilitarianism is: That Utilitarianism prescribes actions that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals, i can easily see a pattern with my fluid intelligence since i am smart, since the pattern is that Utilitarianism maximises happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not only the present but also the future, i mean that responability is inherent to the definition since the well balancing forces us to be responsability in the present or today so that to maximize correctly happiness and well being tomorrow or in the future. I can give you another IQ test that i have rapidly invented and here it is: So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid intelligence that permits to understand, here it is: So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ? It is like my IQ test.. So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be "reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan. More precision of my philosophy about Utilitarianism.. I invite you to read the following definition of what is Utilitarianism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism So as you are noticing, it says that Utilitarianism prescribes actions that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals, but i think that Utilitarianism is not idiotic since it maximises happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not only the present but also the future. And read my following other proverbs that i think are flexible from the start and that i have just invented quickly, here they are and read them carefully: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8 And here is my contributions of my philosophy about morality: More of my philosophy about morality and more.. I think i am smart, and as you have just noticed i have also just invented a proverb that abstract morality, and i invite you to read it again, and i invite you to read my below thoughts so that you understand more my logical proof of what is morality and why it is universal: And here is my other new proverb: Note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as: "the act or process of perfecting" Read here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection This is the definition of perfection above that I use below in my explanation of my new proverb. Here is all my explanation of my new proverb below: My new proverb comes to me from the essence of morality that I explained to you in my political philosophy that I wrote in English, since in morality we are pushed towards the pretty tomorrow because we are aware of this pretty perfume that is the perfection that pushes us or encourages us to be or allows us to become perfect or greatly perfect. Read about it here on my thoughts of my political philosophy about morality: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4 So here is my new proverb: "Life is like the pretty perfume that calls us to be a pretty tomorrow!" So notice carefully my smart play on words in my new proverb, i think it's smart, and you have to know that the future perfection depends on the present perfection, so when today we are responsibility to be the pretty perfection so that to build the pretty tomorrow, then the pretty perfection of today is part of the pretty tomorrow, and the "pretty perfume" in my new proverb is also the today pretty perfection, but you have to understand the symbolic which allows us to say that being this part of the pretty tomorrow is also like being the pretty tomorrow. It is what makes it a smart proverb. More of my philosophy about entropy and about how morality is universal.. I think i am smart, and i am explaining below why morality is universal, but as you have just noticed i have just said that so that to say that morality is universal, it requires from us to know about the requirements such as why to be a global world etc., so there must be a level of consciousness, other than that i will make you feel and see much more that morality is universal since i am seeing it: So take for example the human imperfections or world imperfections, i say that it is because we have those imperfections that also we have morality, and those imperfections causes entropy(A state of disorder and disorganization), this is why we have to be more and more perfection so that to maintain order and so that to attain perfection of being much more perfect or perfect, for example humans are working in there everyday life so that to also maintain order or so that to become perfection or much more perfection, and maintaining order is also that we are perfectioning so that to not to become disorder. More of my philosophy about why morality is universal.. I think i am a smart philosopher, and i will now explain why morality is universal: So take a look at the thing that we call "time", so you can naively look at our everyday life and say that time is not relative, but you can like Einstein analyse it and prove that time is relative, and morality is the same, so when you naively look at it you will think that morality is relative, since you can notice that for example there is many countries with many laws and rules, but when you analyse it you will notice that the goal of morality that we become perfect or much more perfect pushes us forward towards more and more perfection since we have to solve our problems such as our many imperfections, it is also why morality is "progressive", so then the essence of morality become that morality is progressing towards the goal that is that we become perfect or much more perfect, so then the other details of morality are abstracted, so then those acts of humans perfectioning or perfecting towards a much more perfect world or perfect world and that are also codified as morality become that morality is universal, since also we can take this essence of morality as the most important thing. More of my philosophy about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism and more.. I think i am a wise type of person and i think i am a philosopher, and first, i invite you to read my following new thoughts about Utilitarianism and more here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/wgPJkwdGrqc And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism, so i will first ask a philosophical question of: Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ? I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also comes from the fact that we are genetically predisposed to being smart or having a good memory efficiency etc. so this gives much more "chance" to those that have this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich and successful, so this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we have to have a level of diversification of economy that |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment