- Dealing With Teenage Love Problems - 1 Update
- Love Problems Solution - How to Find a Love Problem Solution - 1 Update
- More of my philosophy about the scalability of my form of digital or electronic book and more.. - 1 Update
- More of my philosophy about digital or electronic books and more.. - 1 Update
| love problem <lovepro416@gmail.com>: Dec 28 01:21AM -0800 Teenage love problems are normal and perfectly normal. Young lovers are a lot of fun, but it can also cause a lot of confusion. Many kids find it difficult to move on when their feelings aren't reciprocated. Others stay obsessed with the other person for years, only to stop seeing them once school ends. It's completely normal for young people to fall in love, so don't worry. It simply means they are still in their adolescent phase. In addition to the inability to stay true to a relationship, teenage love problems can also lead to confusion. While it's perfectly normal to be confused and angry, toxic partners will walk on eggshells and apologize for everything. The sex that follows can cause further misunderstanding. A healthy relationship with a healthy partner will help both parties deal with the misunderstanding. But when the two partners are too stressed, the consequences can be disastrous. There are many reasons why teens can't make a relationship last, but there are a few things you can do to help your teenager deal with their teen love troubles. The first is the lack of a relationship. Without a girlfriend, your teen may feel less popular and easy to tag. The second is that being in a relationship with another person can give your teen an artificial boost of self-confidence. The third reason why teenage love problems are so hard to solve is because the two of you can't agree on what to do. https://www.love-problem.solutions/baba-ji/ |
| love problem <lovepro416@gmail.com>: Dec 28 01:07AM -0800 The search for love problems solution may leave you feeling frustrated and confused. This is because a perfect relationship is a rare thing. It is not only beautiful but also brings happiness into your personal life. It also enables you to create beautiful memories. But how to find a love problem solution? Here are some tips: (1) Use an astrology chart to find the exact cause of your relationship's issues; (2) Use a photo of the person who is causing you troubles; and (3) Try to fix the problem as soon as possible. During a love problem analysis, the astrologer will find out what planets are influencing your love life. If your partner is an astrologer, you should submit your birth chart and a detailed description of the problem. In case you don't have a birth chart, you can use numerology instead. In this case, guru ji will use the information from the birth chart to create the right remedy for your problem. He will also provide ancillary remedial suggestions to help you get the desired results. If your love problem is related to astrology, you can consult an astrologer to find the most appropriate remedy. You will have to provide your birth chart and details about the problem in the astrologer's interpretation. If you don't have a birth chart, you can use numerology to determine the planetary factors that are affecting your relationship. You can consult with an astrologer online or in a local store. Both have helped thousands of people overcome their love problems ps://www.love-problem.solutions/baba-ji/ |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Dec 27 05:57PM -0800 Hello, More of my philosophy about the scalability of my form of digital or electronic book and more.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I think i am smart, and i think that my form of digital or electronic book is scalable since you can go from the a main sophisticated "Tree menu" to other childs of sophisticated "Tree menus" inside the left HTML frame of the digital book, so i think it is also a powerful and sophisticated kind of digital book, so i have thought fast this project of mine and i have designed it fast, but also you have to know that the sophisticated "Tree menu" that shows in the left HTML frame of the digital book has not to use the same CSS configuration as the right HTML frame with: "font-size: 1.3vw", since i think that the fonts of the sophisticated "Tree menu" must be fixed fonts size so that to permit to scroll the left HTML frame correctly etc., so i invite you to read my previous thoughts so that to understand my way of doing: More of my philosophy about digital or electronic books and more.. I think i am smart, and i have just finished my programming of a project that easy for you to make electronic or digital books with HTML and Javascript and CSS, now it consists of a sophisticated "Tree menu" that will show the indexes of the digital or electronic book that will appear on the left of the screen in a left HTML frame, also i have just thought about my design and i think that here is how i will show the HTML with CSS pages of the the digital or electronic book: First i have to include in the HTML pages of the digital book the following in HTML: <head> <link rel="stylesheet" href="mystyle.css"> </head> And the mystyle.css "CSS" file will contain the following so that the HTML pages of the digital book appears correctly in different screen resolutions: mystyle.css file is: body { font-size: 1.3vw; } So as you are noticing i am using "font-size: 1.3vw" , since the right HTML frame that contains the HTML pages of the book is 3/4 the size,and here is how i am constructing the HTML frames of the digital book so that to notice it: <!DOCTYPE html> <HTML> <HEAD> <TITLE>A frameset document</TITLE> </HEAD> <FRAMESET> <FRAMESET cols="25%,*" frameborder="yes" framespacing=1> <FRAME name="frame1" src="example01.html" scrolling="auto"> <FRAME name="frame2" src="poems1.html" scrolling="auto"> <Frame scrolling="auto"> </FRAMESET> </FRAMESET> </HTML> So notice that it is: "FRAMESET cols="25%,*", so it means that the left HTML frame of the digital book is 1/4 of the size and the right HTML frame is 3/4 of the size. And i will show you more the sophisticated "Tree menu" that will show the indexes of the digital book, so stay tuned since i will start to organize my thoughts of my philosophy and my other thoughts of software computing etc. into my above form of a digital book. And here is my philosophy of why i am organizing my thoughts in a digital book: More of my philosophy about making paper from trees and about deforestation and more.. I invite you to read the following article about the environmental footprint of paper vs. electronic books: https://www.anthropocenemagazine.org/2020/08/the-environmental-footprint-of-paper-vs-electronic-books/ And as you notice that the above article is just speaking about how much green house emissions we have with footprint of paper vs. electronic books, but i think that deforestation does not only cause green house emissions, but i think we have to take into account the the other following disadvantages: The disadvantages to deforestation are an increased amount of carbon dioxide emissions and soil erosion as well as the destruction of forest habitat and the loss of biological diversity of both plants and animals. Also 24 trees makes around one ton of paper, which is about around 200,000 sheets, and you may use a piece of paper one or two times, but it can be recycled five to seven times. Recycling one ton of paper saves 17 trees. If it's recycled seven times, it saves 117 trees, but i think that it is not enough and it is not enough to recycle (Read in the following article so that to notice it: https://www.sciencefocus.com/science/is-recycling-paper-bad-for-the-environment/), so it is why i think that reading digital or electronic books on computers is better than using paper books. And i invite you to read the following articles: How Useful Is Recycling, Really? Read more here: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/01/recycling-wont-solve-climate-change/617851/ How do people make paper out of trees, and why not use something else? Read more here: https://theconversation.com/how-do-people-make-paper-out-of-trees-and-why-not-use-something-else-156625 Your Web Use Leaves A Carbon Footprint, Here's How You Can Reduce It Read more here: https://www.forbes.com/sites/neilyeoh/2017/07/26/your-web-use-leaves-a-carbon-footprint-heres-how-you-can-reduce-it/?sh=414bea159401 More of my philosophy about standardization of education and about the homogenized way of doing and more.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I think i am really smart, so i will invite you to look again at the following video: Communist Professor Defends Stalin & Mao's Legacy - Heated Debate https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iov6jyfKtRc If you have like a Mensa IQ, you will quickly notice by looking at the above video that there is an important pattern that you can infer from the above video that makes you understand much more and i think i am smart and i will say that the pattern that i have quickly found with my fluid intelligence in the above video is the following: You will notice in the above video that the Patrick Bet-David the capitalistic has a tendency and it is that capitalism has a tendency to like homogenize by saying that people are capable of being successful or are capable of being rich by working "hard", and it is the way of capitalism and it is the way of Patrick Bet-David in the above video, but the being capable of working hard is also a "genetical" characteristic, so then it is a mistake to say so, and president John F. Kennedy the american capitalist was also saying the same by saying: "My fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.", so what he means is that we have to "neglect" or be much less the Social Assistance and Social Solidarity from the government, but i think that it is not an objective and realistic way of doing since you have to read my below thoughts of my philosophy about Class Struggle so that to know how i am logically inferring that we have to be a kind of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, and we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the congress and in Democracy. Look at how John F. Kennedy the capitalist is not correctly thinking in this video: President John F. Kennedy Inaugural Address "Ask Not What Your Country Can Do For You" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1PbQlVMp98 More of my philosophy about capitalism and about Marxism and communism and more.. I invite you to look at the following video: Communist Professor Defends Stalin & Mao's Legacy - Heated Debate https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iov6jyfKtRc So i have just looked at the above video and i will talk more about capitalism: I think the mistake is to call our system capitalism, since i think our system is not capitalism, since it requires also a kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, and read below my philosophy about Class Struggle so that to notice it, so i think that saying that USA is capitalism is not correct thinking, since capitalism only as a system is a stupid system, so this is why we can not compare as in the above video between capitalism and communism, so we need to take into account all the variables such as the kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity that we have inside for example the USA system so that to compare with communism, other than that i have also discussed more about the advantages of capitalism, you can read them in the following web link: And if you want to know more about my views on capitalism, read them here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/cf3Wa4z8Xmc Also you have to read carefully my philosophy about Class Struggle so that to notice from where i am logically inferring that we require a kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and that we have to have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, here it is: And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism, so i will first ask a philosophical question of: Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ? I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich and successful, so this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism, since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions. Also i have just corrected some typos in my below thoughts of my philosophy, since i have just written: "jewish famillies", but i have just corrected it by writing it as: "jewish families", so read again: More of my philosophy about anti-semitism and about the jewish families in Germany and in Europe and more.. I have just looked to the following video of the Rise of the Rothschilds and i think that they are jews: Rise of the Rothschilds: The World's Richest Family https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sM3KOYPL_A As you notice in the above video that jews were not treated correctly in Germany and other european countries, and i think that anti-semitism in that time, and i think even in our today, against jews from neo-nazis and such people comes from the fact that most of the jewish families were living by lending money with interests, but if objectively we follow "technicality" of conventional economic theory, we can say that most jewish families in Germany and other countries of Europe were by lending money with interests doing what we call "Finance", so there jobs were that they were working in the Financial sector as we know it today, so i think that most jewish families in Germany and other European countries were bringing a kind of "resilience" to the economy Germany and other European countries, and read about this kind of economic resilience that i am talking about below by talking about the biggest benefit of finance, read it in my thoughts below, and of course the interest rates in Finance of the banking system and such financial institutions and even for those jewish families that were living in Germany and other countries in Europe "depends" on the Risk of the transaction of lending money, since we can say in french: Que l'argent ne tombe pas du ciel et même pour les banques !, and it means in english: That money does not fall from the sky and even for banking system ! so there must be some kind of Financial discipline even for banking system and such financial institutions !, so as you notice that we have not to be too pessimistic about the jews, also here is what i said about Finance, and notice again that it is Finance that were doing the jewish families in Germany and other European countries in that time: The biggest benefit of finance, is to provide opportunities to people, in the sense that in a world where there is no finance, the only way to start a company is to be born rich or to have saved for a long time. In a world where finance works well, the people with talent can actually start firms and reach their dreams without waiting to either have saved the money, or be lucky and receive it from their parents, and once you create this opportunity, you will have the most talented people take advantage of those opportunities, which favors growth, which favors a good allocation of resources and, ultimately, innovation. But we have to know what is the problem with finance More of my philosophy about my personality and more.. So now i will talk more about me so that you understand my personality, so i am not too narcissistic, but of course i genetically have a characteristic that looks like a level of narcissism but in a positive way, since i am genetically a person that wants to "show" to the others that he is smart and that he is capable and that he is helpful to the others, since you can notice it that i am also thinking in my below thoughts of my philosophy about the poors and the weakest members of the society..., and this genetical characteristic of me is like my "engine", since you have to know that without this kind of genetical characteristic that is an engine you can not advance "much" and be efficient in real life, and i can say in french: Il faudrait savoir jouer au malin dans la vie, mais pas dans le sens péjoratif comme je viens de l'expliquer ici avec même mon nouveau poème, lisez ici pour vous en rendre compte: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Ee1dxgUrhy0, but not only that, but i am like a super soldier that |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Dec 27 05:14PM -0800 Hello, More of my philosophy about digital or electronic books and more.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I think i am smart, and i have just finished my programming of a project that easy for you to make electronic or digital books with HTML and Javascript and CSS, now it consists of a sophisticated "Tree menu" that will show the indexes of the digital or electronic book that will appear on the left of the screen in a left HTML frame, also i have thought about my design and i think that here is how i will show the HTML with CSS pages of the the digital or electronic book: First i have to include in the HTML pages of the digital book the following in HTML: <head> <link rel="stylesheet" href="mystyle.css"> </head> And the mystyle.css "CSS" file will contain the following so that the HTML pages of the digital book appears correctly in different screen resolutions: mystyle.css file is: body { font-size: 1.3vw; } So as you are noticing i am using "font-size: 1.3vw" , since the right HTML frame that contains the HTML pages of the book is 3/4 the size,and here is how i am constructing the HTML frames of the digital book so that to notice it: <!DOCTYPE html> <HTML> <HEAD> <TITLE>A frameset document</TITLE> </HEAD> <FRAMESET> <FRAMESET cols="25%,*" frameborder="yes" framespacing=1> <FRAME name="frame1" src="example01.html" scrolling="auto"> <FRAME name="frame2" src="poems1.html" scrolling="auto"> <Frame scrolling="auto"> </FRAMESET> </FRAMESET> </HTML> So notice that it is: "FRAMESET cols="25%,*", so it means that the left HTML frame of the digital book is 1/4 of the size and the right HTML frame is 3/4 of the size. And i will show you more the sophisticated "Tree menu" that will show the indexes of the digital book, so stay tuned since i will start to organize my thoughts of my philosophy and my other thoughts of software computing etc. into my above form of a digital book. And here is my philosophy of why i am organizing my thoughts in a digital book: More of my philosophy about making paper from trees and about deforestation and more.. I invite you to read the following article about the environmental footprint of paper vs. electronic books: https://www.anthropocenemagazine.org/2020/08/the-environmental-footprint-of-paper-vs-electronic-books/ And as you notice that the above article is just speaking about how much green house emissions we have with footprint of paper vs. electronic books, but i think that deforestation does not only cause green house emissions, but i think we have to take into account the the other following disadvantages: The disadvantages to deforestation are an increased amount of carbon dioxide emissions and soil erosion as well as the destruction of forest habitat and the loss of biological diversity of both plants and animals. Also 24 trees makes around one ton of paper, which is about around 200,000 sheets, and you may use a piece of paper one or two times, but it can be recycled five to seven times. Recycling one ton of paper saves 17 trees. If it's recycled seven times, it saves 117 trees, but i think that it is not enough and it is not enough to recycle (Read in the following article so that to notice it: https://www.sciencefocus.com/science/is-recycling-paper-bad-for-the-environment/), so it is why i think that reading digital or electronic books on computers is better than using paper books. And i invite you to read the following articles: How Useful Is Recycling, Really? Read more here: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/01/recycling-wont-solve-climate-change/617851/ How do people make paper out of trees, and why not use something else? Read more here: https://theconversation.com/how-do-people-make-paper-out-of-trees-and-why-not-use-something-else-156625 Your Web Use Leaves A Carbon Footprint, Here's How You Can Reduce It Read more here: https://www.forbes.com/sites/neilyeoh/2017/07/26/your-web-use-leaves-a-carbon-footprint-heres-how-you-can-reduce-it/?sh=414bea159401 More of my philosophy about standardization of education and about the homogenized way of doing and more.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I think i am really smart, so i will invite you to look again at the following video: Communist Professor Defends Stalin & Mao's Legacy - Heated Debate https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iov6jyfKtRc If you have like a Mensa IQ, you will quickly notice by looking at the above video that there is an important pattern that you can infer from the above video that makes you understand much more and i think i am smart and i will say that the pattern that i have quickly found with my fluid intelligence in the above video is the following: You will notice in the above video that the Patrick Bet-David the capitalistic has a tendency and it is that capitalism has a tendency to like homogenize by saying that people are capable of being successful or are capable of being rich by working "hard", and it is the way of capitalism and it is the way of Patrick Bet-David in the above video, but the being capable of working hard is also a "genetical" characteristic, so then it is a mistake to say so, and president John F. Kennedy the american capitalist was also saying the same by saying: "My fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.", so what he means is that we have to "neglect" or be much less the Social Assistance and Social Solidarity from the government, but i think that it is not an objective and realistic way of doing since you have to read my below thoughts of my philosophy about Class Struggle so that to know how i am logically inferring that we have to be a kind of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, and we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the congress and in Democracy. Look at how John F. Kennedy the capitalist is not correctly thinking in this video: President John F. Kennedy Inaugural Address "Ask Not What Your Country Can Do For You" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1PbQlVMp98 More of my philosophy about capitalism and about Marxism and communism and more.. I invite you to look at the following video: Communist Professor Defends Stalin & Mao's Legacy - Heated Debate https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iov6jyfKtRc So i have just looked at the above video and i will talk more about capitalism: I think the mistake is to call our system capitalism, since i think our system is not capitalism, since it requires also a kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, and read below my philosophy about Class Struggle so that to notice it, so i think that saying that USA is capitalism is not correct thinking, since capitalism only as a system is a stupid system, so this is why we can not compare as in the above video between capitalism and communism, so we need to take into account all the variables such as the kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity that we have inside for example the USA system so that to compare with communism, other than that i have also discussed more about the advantages of capitalism, you can read them in the following web link: And if you want to know more about my views on capitalism, read them here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/cf3Wa4z8Xmc Also you have to read carefully my philosophy about Class Struggle so that to notice from where i am logically inferring that we require a kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and that we have to have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, here it is: And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism, so i will first ask a philosophical question of: Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ? I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich and successful, so this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism, since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions. Also i have just corrected some typos in my below thoughts of my philosophy, since i have just written: "jewish famillies", but i have just corrected it by writing it as: "jewish families", so read again: More of my philosophy about anti-semitism and about the jewish families in Germany and in Europe and more.. I have just looked to the following video of the Rise of the Rothschilds and i think that they are jews: Rise of the Rothschilds: The World's Richest Family https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sM3KOYPL_A As you notice in the above video that jews were not treated correctly in Germany and other european countries, and i think that anti-semitism in that time, and i think even in our today, against jews from neo-nazis and such people comes from the fact that most of the jewish families were living by lending money with interests, but if objectively we follow "technicality" of conventional economic theory, we can say that most jewish families in Germany and other countries of Europe were by lending money with interests doing what we call "Finance", so there jobs were that they were working in the Financial sector as we know it today, so i think that most jewish families in Germany and other European countries were bringing a kind of "resilience" to the economy Germany and other European countries, and read about this kind of economic resilience that i am talking about below by talking about the biggest benefit of finance, read it in my thoughts below, and of course the interest rates in Finance of the banking system and such financial institutions and even for those jewish families that were living in Germany and other countries in Europe "depends" on the Risk of the transaction of lending money, since we can say in french: Que l'argent ne tombe pas du ciel et même pour les banques !, and it means in english: That money does not fall from the sky and even for banking system ! so there must be some kind of Financial discipline even for banking system and such financial institutions !, so as you notice that we have not to be too pessimistic about the jews, also here is what i said about Finance, and notice again that it is Finance that were doing the jewish families in Germany and other European countries in that time: The biggest benefit of finance, is to provide opportunities to people, in the sense that in a world where there is no finance, the only way to start a company is to be born rich or to have saved for a long time. In a world where finance works well, the people with talent can actually start firms and reach their dreams without waiting to either have saved the money, or be lucky and receive it from their parents, and once you create this opportunity, you will have the most talented people take advantage of those opportunities, which favors growth, which favors a good allocation of resources and, ultimately, innovation. But we have to know what is the problem with finance More of my philosophy about my personality and more.. So now i will talk more about me so that you understand my personality, so i am not too narcissistic, but of course i genetically have a characteristic that looks like a level of narcissism but in a positive way, since i am genetically a person that wants to "show" to the others that he is smart and that he is capable and that he is helpful to the others, since you can notice it that i am also thinking in my below thoughts of my philosophy about the poors and the weakest members of the society..., and this genetical characteristic of me is like my "engine", since you have to know that without this kind of genetical characteristic that is an engine you can not advance "much" and be efficient in real life, and i can say in french: Il faudrait savoir jouer au malin dans la vie, mais pas dans le sens péjoratif comme je viens de l'expliquer ici avec même mon nouveau poème, lisez ici pour vous en rendre compte: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Ee1dxgUrhy0, but not only that, but i am like a super soldier that is highly smart, since i am inventing the "tools" that permit me to be much more smart and that permit me to adapt efficiently, so this is why you are seeing me inventing quickly my thoughts of my philosophy and i am posting it in front of you and you are seeing me inventing quickly my proverbs and posting them here and you are seeing me inventing quickly my poems of Love and and posting them here and i am inventing quickly my monotheistic religion and i am posting it here and i am "truthful" and "honest" in my thoughts of my new monotheistic religion, and this way of doing is like inventing quickly the much more sophisticated tools that permit you to be much more smart and that permit you to adapt efficiently, and i think that it is a sign of being a smart person and a wise type of person, and why i am considering myself as a wise type of person? since you can read how i am quickly talking to you in my below thoughts of my |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment