| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Dec 23 01:47PM -0800 Hello, Read again, i correct about more of my philosophy about making paper from trees and about deforestation and more.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I invite you to read the following article about the environmental footprint of paper vs. electronic books: https://www.anthropocenemagazine.org/2020/08/the-environmental-footprint-of-paper-vs-electronic-books/ And as you notice that the above article is just speaking about how much green house emissions we have with footprint of paper vs. electronic books, but i think that deforestation does not only cause green house emissions, but i think we have to take into account the the other following disadvantages: The disadvantages to deforestation are an increased amount of carbon dioxide emissions and soil erosion as well as the destruction of forest habitat and the loss of biological diversity of both plants and animals. Also 24 trees makes around one ton of paper, which is about around 200,000 sheets, and you may use a piece of paper one or two times, but it can be recycled five to seven times. Recycling one ton of paper saves 17 trees. If it's recycled seven times, it saves 117 trees, but i think that it is not enough and it is not enough to recycle (Read in the following article so that to notice it: https://www.sciencefocus.com/science/is-recycling-paper-bad-for-the-environment/), so it is why i think that reading digital or electronic books on computers is better than using paper books, and of course i am actually programming with HTML and CSS and Javascript so that to easy the job of creating a sophisticated digital or electronic books with HTML and CSS and Javascript with dynamically configurable HTML and CSS fonts. And i invite you to read the following articles: How Useful Is Recycling, Really? Read more here: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/01/recycling-wont-solve-climate-change/617851/ How do people make paper out of trees, and why not use something else? Read more here: https://theconversation.com/how-do-people-make-paper-out-of-trees-and-why-not-use-something-else-156625 Your Web Use Leaves A Carbon Footprint, Here's How You Can Reduce It Read more here: https://www.forbes.com/sites/neilyeoh/2017/07/26/your-web-use-leaves-a-carbon-footprint-heres-how-you-can-reduce-it/?sh=414bea159401 More of my philosophy about relativism and about morality and more.. I have just read the following article of white supremacists and neo-nazis of a white supremacist website called National Vanguard: Ancient Admixture: Death Blow to Racialism? — part 1 https://nationalvanguard.org/2021/12/ancient-admixture-death-blow-to-racialism-part-1/ So notice carefully on the above article how it is starting by saying: "And some of these discoveries do undermine old-fashioned racialism. But they do not undermine the higher racialism — the true understanding — held by us in the National Alliance.." So notice how it is saying: "The true understanding — held by us in the National Alliance" So as you are noticing it is not correct thinking, since I will say that "relativism" is a major disruptor of our mental immune system, but objective standards of right and wrong are our main defences against bad ideas. If we lose those standards, then anything goes, so this is why i say that saying in the above article of white supremacists: "the true understanding held by us in the National Alliance..." is too much certainty, since by reading the above article you will notice that it tries to prove that there is human genetical differences between ethnic groups like the ethnic groups of white and blacks etc., but notice that i am not saying races, since there is only one human race called the human race, but notice carefully that the above certainty of those white supremacists doesn't understand correctly how to introduce the right "randomness" like in Evolutionary algorithms so that to not get stuck in a local minimum and so that to converge towards the global optimum, so i think that this randomness like in Evolutionary algorithms that must be introduced is also allowing a certain level of Genetic mixture to happen inside a group or population, like 25% or so, like allowing Genetic mixture between arabs and white europeans etc. so that to ensure a kind of "diversity" that ensures genetical resilience or resilience. So this why i just said the following: I think i am a wise type of person, and from my thoughts below about morality, i will say that morality is like mathematics, since morality is universal as i am explaining below, but so that to be this abstraction of morality that i call "perfection at best", it must be thought really efficiently systemically, so then you notice that it must come with a kind of right patience or right tolerance so that to not be mistakes in the process codification of morality, so morality is in abstraction universal, but so that to be universal in reality it must be thought really efficiently and systemically. Also the white supremacists and others have to take into account my following thoughts so that to understand correctly: And read carefully my following thoughts about Nanotechnology and about Exponential Progress and about genetics: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ And read my following thoughts: More of my philosophy about capitalism and about Class Struggle and more.. Today i will discuss more about an important subject, so first i invite you to read my following previous thoughts: -- "Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ? I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also comes from the fact that we are genetically predisposed to being smart or having a good memory efficiency etc. so this gives much more "chance" to those that have this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich and successful, so this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism, since i think we have to have some kind Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions." -- So as you are noticing in my above thoughts that i just said the following: "But i will say that the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings resilience" And here is how i will explain it more, look at Financial sector, so you can understand more capitalism and the mechanism of diversity that brings "resilience" and that needs a good allocation of resources in capitalism by reading my following thoughts: The biggest benefit of finance, is to provide opportunities to people, in the sense that in a world where there is no finance, the only way to start a company is to be born rich or to have saved for a long time. In a world where finance works well, the people with talent can actually start firms and reach their dreams without waiting to either have saved the money, or be lucky and receive it from their parents, and once you create this opportunity, you will have the most talented people take advantage of those opportunities, which favors growth, which favors a good allocation of resources and, ultimately, innovation. But we have to know what is the problem with finance, and here it is, read the following so that to understand: One last chance to fix capitalism Read more here: https://hbr.org/2020/03/one-last-chance-to-fix-capitalism So i invite you to look at the following video about capitalism: How to Improve Capitalism https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOaJe68C-bU So as you notice in the above video that you can also fix capitalism by giving voting rights and tax advantages to long-term shareholders and not by raising taxes, and you need to have sovereign wealth funds and national pension funds representative of the long term collective interests etc, so i invite you to look the above video of "How to improve capitalism" so that to understand more. And if you want to know more about my views on capitalism, read them here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/cf3Wa4z8Xmc More of my philosophy about the "assets" of the central Bank of European Union and more.. I have just looked at the following video of Olivier Berruyer , born on October 26 , 1975 in Bron that is a French blogger and actuary by profession, and you can read about him more here: https://fr-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Olivier_Berruyer?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en And here is the video of him: NOTRE SYSTÈME FINANCIER VA S'EFFONDRER https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BknDh30qnTI So i think i am smart and i will say that Olivier Berruyer the actuary by profession in the above video is not so smart, since he is for example giving a graphic of the "assets" of the central Bank of European Union between years 1999 and 2021, and he is also explaining why it is problematic and he is also saying that the negative interest rate of the central Bank of European Union is something really problematic and that it must not be so, but i think that he is not so smart, since you can look at the graphic in the above video of the "assets" of the central of the Bank of European Union between years 1999 and 2021, and you can notice that it is not so problematic, since the time where this fast growth has happened is not too long and he is not saying that the very important thing to know is that this fast growth of the assets of central Bank of European Union also "coincides" with the crisis of Covid-19 and we have to know that negative interest rates are typically seen during weak economies and/or periods of deflation such as in period of the crisis of Covid-19, and you can read that even in Canada there can also be negative interest rates, read here so that to notice it: What would negative interest rates mean for Canadians? https://financialpost.com/moneywise/what-would-negative-interest-rates-mean-for-canadians-3 And it is also related to my following thoughts: And here is also how i have just explained why the governments of Europe and USA are "spending" more in the economy and are following the Keynesian economics in this period of economic Crisis of Covid-19: More of my philosophy about the Keynesian economics and more.. I invite you to look at the following new video about how the governments of Europe and USA are "spending" more in the economy and are following the Keynesian economics in this period of economic Crisis of Covid-19, since i think that Keynesian economics even if not followed all the time, has still its "advantage" in this kind of economic crisis, and the macroeconomic theories and models of Keynesian economics is about how aggregate demand (total spending in the economy) strongly influences economic output and inflations, so i invite you to look at the following new video so that to understand the how of it: The EU's New Plan to Transform the Economy - VisualPolitik EN https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2-HqLZJIhU More of my philosophy about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and about my philosophy.. You have to understand my contributions as a philosopher by reading my philosophy, but one of my contribution of my philosophy is also related to the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, since the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche articulated ethical dilemma as a tension between the master vs. slave morality; the former in which we make decisions based on the assessment of consequences, and the latter in which we make decisions based on our conception of good vs. evil, but you have to understand my contribution of my philosophy about morality, since the first of my contribution about morality is that i am giving a kind of logical proof that morality is "universal", but not only that but i have invented quickly a proverb that abstract much more correctly morality so that you understand more, so read it below, so i think from my thoughts below of my contribution to philosophy, that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not so smart, since you will understand from my thoughts below of my philosophy that morality of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is an Elitist morality called in his philosophy the morality of the master, but notice that he is not so smart, since the morality of the master in his philosophy has the "tendency" to be great "performance" of perfection, so this is why it can be morality that oppresses people, so we can then say that morality of philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is the not correct morality, since here again you are noticing that Democracy is a tool that permit to avoid such oppression of the morality of the master of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, so i invite you to read again some of my contributions to philosophy about morality in my following thoughts, but first i invite you to read my following thoughts of my philosophy about Utilitrianism so that to understand more that morality of the master of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not the correct one: More of my philosophy about Democracy and Utilitarianism and more.. I think i am a wise type of person, and i will also make you understand another very important thing, and it is that my redefinition of Utilitarianism below make the rule of Utilitarianism "valid" and "true", since the rule of Utilitarianism that is maximizing happiness and well-being for all affected individuals is also ruled by the future consequences, so since our future consequences must be that we have to be a kind of order in a Democracy that permits Democracy to work, so then we have to "introduce" like a kind of randomness such by logical analogy as randomness of Evolutionary algorithms in artificial |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Dec 23 01:30PM -0800 Hello, More of my philosophy about making paper from trees and about deforestation and more.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I invite you to read the following article about the environmental footprint of paper vs. electronic books: https://www.anthropocenemagazine.org/2020/08/the-environmental-footprint-of-paper-vs-electronic-books/ And as you notice that the above article is just speaking about how much green house emissions we have with footprint of paper vs. electronic books, but i think that deforestation doesn not only cause green house emissions, but i think we has to take into account the the other following disadvantages: The disadvantages to deforestation are an increased amount of carbon dioxide emissions and soil erosion as well as the destruction of forest habitat and the loss of biological diversity of both plants and animals. Also 24 trees makes around one ton of paper, which is about around 200,000 sheets, and you may use a piece of paper one or two times, but it can be recycled five to seven times. Recycling one ton of paper saves 17 trees. If it's recycled seven times, it saves 117 trees, but i think that it is not enough and it is not enough to recycle (Read in the following article so that to notice it: https://www.sciencefocus.com/science/is-recycling-paper-bad-for-the-environment/), so it is why i think that reading digital or electronic ebooks on computers is better than using paper books, and of course i am actually programming with HTML and CSS and Javascript so that to easy the job of creating a sophisticated digital or electronic books with HTML and CSS and Javascript with dynamically configurable HTML and CSS fonts. And i invite you to read the following articles: How Useful Is Recycling, Really? Read more here: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/01/recycling-wont-solve-climate-change/617851/ How do people make paper out of trees, and why not use something else? Read more here: https://theconversation.com/how-do-people-make-paper-out-of-trees-and-why-not-use-something-else-156625 Your Web Use Leaves A Carbon Footprint, Here's How You Can Reduce It Read more here: https://www.forbes.com/sites/neilyeoh/2017/07/26/your-web-use-leaves-a-carbon-footprint-heres-how-you-can-reduce-it/?sh=414bea159401 More of my philosophy about relativism and about morality and more.. I have just read the following article of white supremacists and neo-nazis of a white supremacist website called National Vanguard: Ancient Admixture: Death Blow to Racialism? — part 1 https://nationalvanguard.org/2021/12/ancient-admixture-death-blow-to-racialism-part-1/ So notice carefully on the above article how it is starting by saying: "And some of these discoveries do undermine old-fashioned racialism. But they do not undermine the higher racialism — the true understanding — held by us in the National Alliance.." So notice how it is saying: "The true understanding — held by us in the National Alliance" So as you are noticing it is not correct thinking, since I will say that "relativism" is a major disruptor of our mental immune system, but objective standards of right and wrong are our main defences against bad ideas. If we lose those standards, then anything goes, so this is why i say that saying in the above article of white supremacists: "the true understanding held by us in the National Alliance..." is too much certainty, since by reading the above article you will notice that it tries to prove that there is human genetical differences between ethnic groups like the ethnic groups of white and blacks etc., but notice that i am not saying races, since there is only one human race called the human race, but notice carefully that the above certainty of those white supremacists doesn't understand correctly how to introduce the right "randomness" like in Evolutionary algorithms so that to not get stuck in a local minimum and so that to converge towards the global optimum, so i think that this randomness like in Evolutionary algorithms that must be introduced is also allowing a certain level of Genetic mixture to happen inside a group or population, like 25% or so, like allowing Genetic mixture between arabs and white europeans etc. so that to ensure a kind of "diversity" that ensures genetical resilience or resilience. So this why i just said the following: I think i am a wise type of person, and from my thoughts below about morality, i will say that morality is like mathematics, since morality is universal as i am explaining below, but so that to be this abstraction of morality that i call "perfection at best", it must be thought really efficiently systemically, so then you notice that it must come with a kind of right patience or right tolerance so that to not be mistakes in the process codification of morality, so morality is in abstraction universal, but so that to be universal in reality it must be thought really efficiently and systemically. Also the white supremacists and others have to take into account my following thoughts so that to understand correctly: And read carefully my following thoughts about Nanotechnology and about Exponential Progress and about genetics: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ And read my following thoughts: More of my philosophy about capitalism and about Class Struggle and more.. Today i will discuss more about an important subject, so first i invite you to read my following previous thoughts: -- "Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ? I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also comes from the fact that we are genetically predisposed to being smart or having a good memory efficiency etc. so this gives much more "chance" to those that have this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich and successful, so this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism, since i think we have to have some kind Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions." -- So as you are noticing in my above thoughts that i just said the following: "But i will say that the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings resilience" And here is how i will explain it more, look at Financial sector, so you can understand more capitalism and the mechanism of diversity that brings "resilience" and that needs a good allocation of resources in capitalism by reading my following thoughts: The biggest benefit of finance, is to provide opportunities to people, in the sense that in a world where there is no finance, the only way to start a company is to be born rich or to have saved for a long time. In a world where finance works well, the people with talent can actually start firms and reach their dreams without waiting to either have saved the money, or be lucky and receive it from their parents, and once you create this opportunity, you will have the most talented people take advantage of those opportunities, which favors growth, which favors a good allocation of resources and, ultimately, innovation. But we have to know what is the problem with finance, and here it is, read the following so that to understand: One last chance to fix capitalism Read more here: https://hbr.org/2020/03/one-last-chance-to-fix-capitalism So i invite you to look at the following video about capitalism: How to Improve Capitalism https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOaJe68C-bU So as you notice in the above video that you can also fix capitalism by giving voting rights and tax advantages to long-term shareholders and not by raising taxes, and you need to have sovereign wealth funds and national pension funds representative of the long term collective interests etc, so i invite you to look the above video of "How to improve capitalism" so that to understand more. And if you want to know more about my views on capitalism, read them here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/cf3Wa4z8Xmc More of my philosophy about the "assets" of the central Bank of European Union and more.. I have just looked at the following video of Olivier Berruyer , born on October 26 , 1975 in Bron that is a French blogger and actuary by profession, and you can read about him more here: https://fr-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Olivier_Berruyer?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en And here is the video of him: NOTRE SYSTÈME FINANCIER VA S'EFFONDRER https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BknDh30qnTI So i think i am smart and i will say that Olivier Berruyer the actuary by profession in the above video is not so smart, since he is for example giving a graphic of the "assets" of the central Bank of European Union between years 1999 and 2021, and he is also explaining why it is problematic and he is also saying that the negative interest rate of the central Bank of European Union is something really problematic and that it must not be so, but i think that he is not so smart, since you can look at the graphic in the above video of the "assets" of the central of the Bank of European Union between years 1999 and 2021, and you can notice that it is not so problematic, since the time where this fast growth has happened is not too long and he is not saying that the very important thing to know is that this fast growth of the assets of central Bank of European Union also "coincides" with the crisis of Covid-19 and we have to know that negative interest rates are typically seen during weak economies and/or periods of deflation such as in period of the crisis of Covid-19, and you can read that even in Canada there can also be negative interest rates, read here so that to notice it: What would negative interest rates mean for Canadians? https://financialpost.com/moneywise/what-would-negative-interest-rates-mean-for-canadians-3 And it is also related to my following thoughts: And here is also how i have just explained why the governments of Europe and USA are "spending" more in the economy and are following the Keynesian economics in this period of economic Crisis of Covid-19: More of my philosophy about the Keynesian economics and more.. I invite you to look at the following new video about how the governments of Europe and USA are "spending" more in the economy and are following the Keynesian economics in this period of economic Crisis of Covid-19, since i think that Keynesian economics even if not followed all the time, has still its "advantage" in this kind of economic crisis, and the macroeconomic theories and models of Keynesian economics is about how aggregate demand (total spending in the economy) strongly influences economic output and inflations, so i invite you to look at the following new video so that to understand the how of it: The EU's New Plan to Transform the Economy - VisualPolitik EN https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2-HqLZJIhU More of my philosophy about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and about my philosophy.. You have to understand my contributions as a philosopher by reading my philosophy, but one of my contribution of my philosophy is also related to the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, since the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche articulated ethical dilemma as a tension between the master vs. slave morality; the former in which we make decisions based on the assessment of consequences, and the latter in which we make decisions based on our conception of good vs. evil, but you have to understand my contribution of my philosophy about morality, since the first of my contribution about morality is that i am giving a kind of logical proof that morality is "universal", but not only that but i have invented quickly a proverb that abstract much more correctly morality so that you understand more, so read it below, so i think from my thoughts below of my contribution to philosophy, that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not so smart, since you will understand from my thoughts below of my philosophy that morality of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is an Elitist morality called in his philosophy the morality of the master, but notice that he is not so smart, since the morality of the master in his philosophy has the "tendency" to be great "performance" of perfection, so this is why it can be morality that oppresses people, so we can then say that morality of philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is the not correct morality, since here again you are noticing that Democracy is a tool that permit to avoid such oppression of the morality of the master of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, so i invite you to read again some of my contributions to philosophy about morality in my following thoughts, but first i invite you to read my following thoughts of my philosophy about Utilitrianism so that to understand more that morality of the master of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not the correct one: More of my philosophy about Democracy and Utilitarianism and more.. I think i am a wise type of person, and i will also make you understand another very important thing, and it is that my redefinition of Utilitarianism below make the rule of Utilitarianism "valid" and "true", since the rule of Utilitarianism that is maximizing happiness and well-being for all affected individuals is also ruled by the future consequences, so since our future consequences must be that we have to be a kind of order in a Democracy that permits Democracy to work, so then we have to "introduce" like a kind of randomness such by logical analogy as randomness of Evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence, since to not |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment