- Your eternal soul is at stake - 5 Updates
- Best way to use enum with classes - 3 Updates
- Hertz constants in my code - 1 Update
| "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Oct 24 01:26PM -0700 Melzzzzz wrote: > "Rick C. Hodgin" wrote: > > Jesus Christ is truth. > No. It's just a name. What does the Bible say? http://biblehub.com/kjv/john/14-6.htm 6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. http://biblehub.com/kjv/john/18-37.htm 37 Pilate therefore said unto him, Art thou a king then? Jesus answered, Thou sayest that I am a king. To this end was I born, and for this cause came I into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth. Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice. "Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice." > > The universe He [built] is founded upon Him, so > > it is founded upon truth. > What are you on? Even Bible does not says that. What does the Bible say? http://biblehub.com/kjv/john/1.htm 1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 The same was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. That's the universe. But who is "the Word"? What does the Bible say? 14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. 15 John [the Baptist] bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me. 16 And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace. 17 For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ. 18 No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him. "The Word" is Jesus Christ. He is the living Word given to us for this purpose which, after Pentecost, now dwells within us through the born again nature. It's why you cannot understand it ... it is spiritually discerned. But if you set your sights on the truth, you will come to know it (if it is a true and honest seeking of the truth): http://biblehub.com/kjv/john/15-26.htm 26 But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me: The very nature of God is truth. Everything He creates is founded upon truth. It is the perversion of His Creation by sin that introduces falseness. ----- If the rest of your Bible knowledge is as errant as you've indicated, you would do yourself a service to study to show yourself approved, a workman who need not be ashamed rightly dividing the word of truth: http://biblehub.com/kjv/2_timothy/2-15.htm 15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. There is power in knowledge, and in knowledge of the things of Jesus Christ there is life eternal. Best regards, Rick C. Hodgin |
| Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com>: Oct 24 11:13PM +0200 On Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:26:46 -0700 (PDT) > "The Word" is Jesus Christ. He is the living Word given to us for this > purpose which, after Pentecost, now dwells within us through the born > again nature. What are you on? You interpret metaphors as they are description of creation of universe ;) Gospel of course emphasizes Jesus, but he is not even mentioned in Old Testament ;) -- press any key to continue or any other to quit |
| Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com>: Oct 24 10:02PM +0200 On Mon, 24 Oct 2016 05:23:06 -0700 (PDT) > searching the truth, and God flipping that inner switch which allowed > me to then know the truth. And when I asked forgiveness for my sin > and was born again, the change occurred within me. In other words you were sober now you are drunk... -- press any key to continue or any other to quit |
| "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Oct 24 03:20PM -0700 Melzzzzz wrote: > What are you on? You interpret metaphors as they are description > of creation of universe ;) Gospel of course emphasizes Jesus, > but he is not even mentioned in Old Testament ;) The Messiah is the entire focus of the Bible. He is mentioned through- out the Old Testament, and is identified in the New Testament as Jesus. These progressive revelations fill in missing information from the times before. We now know details which were not provided to man before Jesus was made flesh. These revelations are for us now, whereas those before went only by what they had. Your interpretation of scripture and your lack of knowledge on the Bible is causing you tremendous loss. And your teaching of falseness is causing others to stumble, and will bring you even more loss. You need to be teaching people rightly, otherwise you only heap damnation increasing upon yourself. Best regards, Rick C. Hodgin |
| "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid>: Oct 24 03:56PM -0700 On 10/21/2016 9:00 AM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > Your eternal soul is at stake. Your choices in this world determine where > you'll go for all eternity. [...] > God is perfect and holy and righteous and He does not allow sin to dwell in > His presence. Then why would you be allowed to be in God's presence for infinity? You, as you say, are full of sin! Oh yeah, you are born again and have so sin... What a joke. |
| David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>: Oct 24 10:42PM +0200 On 24/10/16 19:52, Jerry Stuckle wrote: > Only pedantic trolls would bring up wavelengths when discussing voltages > along a wire. And that pedantic troll just proved once again he has no > idea what he's talking about. Let me quote you: > 0.097ns per cycle. In copper, this is a wavelength of just over one > inch - which means on a 100' cable, about 4800 bits would be transmitted > before the first one was received at the destination. So we have 4800 bits going along the 100 foot cable before the first bit arrives. (I haven't bothered to check your arithmetic - even if it is wrong, the numbers will do here.) How exactly do you expect this to work without there being different voltages at different places along the cable? And which "troll" was it that first mentioned wavelengths? (Hint - look at the quotation above.) Not that I think referring to wavelengths in this context is trollish - it is a relevant point when discussing how the signal passes along the wire. People /do/ discuss the different voltages at different points on a wire when they are relevant - such as on a transmission line. If I had actually wanted to be pedantic, I would point out that any wire, superconductor or not, will have the same voltage at all points if no current is flowing - because the resistive loses are zero with zero current. |
| Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>: Oct 24 05:52PM -0400 On 10/24/2016 4:42 PM, David Brown wrote: > wrong, the numbers will do here.) How exactly do you expect this to > work without there being different voltages at different places along > the cable? As I said - only a pedantic troll would consider this to be multiple voltages on a wire. Educated people - including engineers, know when you are talking about voltage on a wire, you are talking about the instantaneous voltage at a specific point on the wire. If you want to talk wavelengths, etc., then you use different terminology. > the signal passes along the wire. People /do/ discuss the different > voltages at different points on a wire when they are relevant - such as > on a transmission line. Yes, I did - to identify the term you are referring to in your trolling. And when discussing a transmission line, when you are discussing voltage, once again you are referring to the voltage at a specific point and time. > wire, superconductor or not, will have the same voltage at all points if > no current is flowing - because the resistive loses are zero with zero > current. No, you're just being your usual pedantic trollish self. And by definition, if there is no current, there is no voltage, since voltage is current times resistance. If current is zero, so much be voltage. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle jstucklex@attglobal.net ================== |
| David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>: Oct 25 12:19AM +0200 On 24/10/16 23:52, Jerry Stuckle wrote: > No, you're just being your usual pedantic trollish self. And by > definition, if there is no current, there is no voltage, since voltage > is current times resistance. If current is zero, so much be voltage. Tell that to a battery. There may be no current flowing, but there is a voltage across the terminals. |
| Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid>: Oct 24 09:21PM +0100 On 24/10/2016 20:05, Scott Lurndal wrote: > When looking at CPU performance, IPC (instructions per cycle) is the > interesting metric. Given that and the cycle time, one can derive > the mean instructions-per-second count. Only if the architectures are the same. Different architectures require different numbers of instructions to do the same work. Traditionally CISC architectures run fewer instructions that each do more work compared to RISC. Andy |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment