- Plan to go to church Sunday - 3 Updates
- Using std::enable_if and std::is_trivially_copyable - 1 Update
- overloading operator== and casting - 1 Update
- "Distinguishing between maybe-null vs never-null is the important thing" - 1 Update
| Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: Feb 21 10:19PM On 21/02/2017 22:11, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: >>> If you're absolutely certain that God doesn't exist (upper-case "G"), >>> then you have nothing to worry about, Leigh. >> Yes, I am absolutely certain that God (upper-case "G") doesn't exist. [tedium snipped: tl;dr] > know for sure because you have not proven it out. You have not gone > through the steps necessary to literally prove it point-by-point, > which is what I tried to do. I do know for sure. I have "proven it out". As I know for sure that evolution is a fact I know for sure that the Abrahamic god (that's the god with a upper-case "G") doesn't exist. [more tedium snipped] /Flibble |
| Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com>: Feb 21 06:36PM -0400 Can we just kill this thread now as it has reached its shelf life. Please kill-file that one person who keeps posting non C++ stuff and the problem is solved once and for all. |
| Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: Feb 21 10:39PM On 21/02/2017 22:36, Real Troll wrote: > Can we just kill this thread now as it has reached its shelf life. > Please kill-file that one person who keeps posting non C++ stuff and the > problem is solved once and for all. I tried adding Rick to a kill file but the problem is unless everyone else does the same it isn't very effective: I still see the threads. /Flibble |
| bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net>: Feb 21 12:38PM -0500 On 02/21/2017 04:22 AM, Chris Vine wrote: > type of the class itself. That is more complicated - to use std::enable_if > for this you need a combination of SFINAE with partial specialization. > This will do that for you: Thanks! Yes, that's correct. |
| Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid>: Feb 21 12:08PM > euler.cpp|113 col 28| error: comparison between distinct pointer types > ???tree::Predicate<int, int>*??? and ???tree::Node<int>*??? lacks a cast You are comparing pointers, not values. Are you sure you didn't intend to write "*ptr1 == *ptr2" instead of "ptr1 == ptr2"? |
| Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk>: Feb 20 11:32PM On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 15:03:03 -0800 (PST) woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: [snip] > from looking into my work. Same old same old from you for years, > Chris. If you can't offer some constructive criticism, I suggest > you say nothing. That is outrageous. I have never even looked at your work (if by that you mean your serializing product), let alone attacked it. Please correct me by showing some post (any post) of mine which has referred to it, or apologize if you are man enough to do so: I suspect you are not. Your posts on this topic of "backporting" C++14/17 features to a C++11 compiler are ridiculous. But that is a separate matter. I have now become cross with you. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment