- Read again i correct about political philosophy - 1 Update
- About political philosophy ? - 1 Update
- About a philosophical problem - 1 Update
- Now I will give my explanation of what is consciousness... - 1 Update
- The essence of Science - 1 Update
- Cross Platform FIFO Queue - 1 Update
| Ramine <toto@toto.net>: Feb 22 05:28PM -0500 Hello........ About political philosophy... You know me more that i am a white arab, and i am a computer programmer that has a diploma in Microelectronics and informatics and i have succeeded one year of mathematics at university level, and i have learned english fast in about 5 months to be able to write here about my thoughts, and now i speak arab and english and french.. What is also political philosophy ? I am an experienced programmer in parallel programming, and in parallel programming there is an important criterion that is scalability, so you have to scale more the system, i have taken a lot of care to make many of my software programs scalable on multicore systems, politics also is the same, you have to know how to prove using logic and measure to make the others believe you and follow you, this is also about scalability, this is why you have seen me taking care of some variables to better optimize the system, you have to understand that compassion and respect and love is also optimization of the system and it's also more efficiency. So it is also more power and more virility, but if you think that love and compassion and respect have to come with feelings , you are not correct, you have to know how to execute rules like executing software instructions to be able to output a result of compassion and/or respect and/or love without the need of feelings, that's what you have to understand about optimization, this is why you are seing me proving to you that the variables of compassion and love and respect are mandatory by standards of today to be better optimized and to better survive. Doing philosophy, the real philosophy is learning how to be organized, because the real philosophy is based on rationality and logic, and rationality and logic is more science, and more science is in fact more organization and more organization is the cause of power and power is the cause of better survival... But walking your way in the real philosophy you will learn that politics must be treated like programming safe critical systems, so this prerequisite will push you towards more maturity doing more science, because science is also the light and you have to love the light.. If you are not organized like this, you will risk weakness and degenerescence, this is why before i have written to you my thoughts i have done more philosophy.. You can let it as it is, but becareful of your animal instincts, but what is animal instincts? if you are not objective it is also like animal instincts, if you are not logic and rationality, it is also like animal instincts, weakness is also like animal instincts, so you have to be wise and know how to avoid the weakness of those animal instincts , this is why you will notice that i am taking care of my thoughts, please reread my following thoughts carefully to be able to notice it: What is doing philosophy ? I think doing philosophy, the real philosophy has as a goal to know the essence of things.. Doing philosophy is like learning how to walk and how to talk and how to construct.. Doing philosophy is understanding the weakness of your animal instincts.. Doing philosophy is an act also of feeling what is science , because philosophy has participated to the construction of the mathematical tool that is logic. Doing philosophy is feeling better the essence of life and the essence of things, this permits you to transcend better your living conditions.. So doing philosophy is a noble act that you have to treat with respect by constraining it with rationality and wisdom.. Doing philosophy has one of the requirement of science, it is that you have to be patiant in searching for the truth and you have to be patiant to not hurt or harm.. This is what i have learned about philosophy, please reread my following thoughts that i have corrected to understand better the essence of science: The essence of Science.. I am a computer programmer that has a diploma in Microelectronics and informatics and i have succeeded one year of mathematics at university level, and i have learned english fast in about 5 months to be able to write here about my thoughts, and now i speak arab and english and french.. Science is the tool by excellence to attain a higher degree of quality. Science is not maximization of profit, or saying that arabs are less beautiful than white europeans and starting to discriminate them, this is intellectual inferiority that must be dealt with with wisdom, and wisdom is also using science as a tool to attain a higher degree of quality, you have to relearn how to know about the basic requirements and prerequisites to better survive and to better the system, i think some of you here are still immature and are not wisdom and they are not science and they are less disciplined in there thinking, but why science and why wisdom ? you will say that our living conditions are not still well enough to be capable of respecting correctly the requirements and the prerequisites, but this is inferiority, because even if we are not still happy over this planet, a lesser requirement is to not degenerate also towards destruction and stupid violence, this is like programming safe critical systems, and it needs those high standards, so responsability does come with a price, that is more intellectual effort and more effort.. About a mandatory requirement... In philosophy and science there is a mandatory requirement, it is that we have to analyse better and we have to search better and we have to be patiant to not hurt or harm the system.. this is also a prerequisite requirement to be able to program safe critical systems.. If you say that arabs are less beautiful than white europeans and you start to discriminate them, this is not the high standards of science, our world is interconnected and you have to be more disciplined to avoid to hurt and harm the economy or hurt and harm the security, and better security and better economy are caused by many variables such as outsourcing and economic integration and economic investments and by compassion and by love and by respect, this is why you have to be more disciplined and know how to execute rules that output respect and/or compassion and/or love towards arabs , to be more optimized and to better the system. And about the essence of life... Why do you think i am here ? I am disciplined and internet for me is a tool that i have also to respect by making it more valuable, so i am treating politics like programming safe critical systems, so it is why you are seing me getting serious about some variables, being compassion can be virility and efficiency, and compassion is not just a feeling , it is also executing rules that gives an output of compassion, but for a narrow view it is not, so you have to set your mindset correctly, you have to learn how to program safe critical systems as i have more learned to be able to think more correctly, you will notice for example that i am constructing incrementally my thoughts and finally it results in a more consistent posts , because strongness and more quality don't come from the sky, it can be constructed incrementally layer by layer as we are doing it we computer programmers, also when you are progamming safe critical systems it's like the high standards of science, you have to know how to be patiant to not hurt or harm the system, it is a prerequisite of science, this wisdom is a prerequisite for the standards of today , yesterday was yesterday , but today is today , so you have to be wiser and more disciplined because discipline is a prerequisite to be more organized and to be more organized is a prerequisite to be more power that knows how to survive better and knows how to solve our problems, so about the essence of discipline and organization here is what i have written: Do you think stupid violence is discipline and organization ? Surviving better must be guided better by optimizing better and this a mandatory requirement, it is mandatory for reason, but stupid violence is not reason, so we have to treat it like foolishness ! do you think i am stupid to talk as i am talking ? when i say to you love and respect and compassion you will answer that we can not love easily or we can not be compassion easily or we can not be respect easily, because of our difficult living conditions, but this is not wisdom and this is not intelligence, even though love and respect and compassion is not easy, you have to know that Love and respect and compassion can emerge also from a disciplined acts that execute rules like executing instructions of a software, the result and the output is love and compassion and respect, this is how i am disciplined, this is why you have seen me calling Ray Kurzweil a director at Google our beloved and beautiful jew, i am not following individual egoism or following stupidly nationalism, i am following rationality and logic to better optimize and to better optimize my thinking, and i think that my thoughts were rationality and logic also, this is why i am following them and i am not neglecting the variables of love and compassion and respect. So be wiser and smart.. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Ramine <toto@toto.net>: Feb 22 05:20PM -0500 Hello, About political philosophy... You know me more that i am a white arab, and i am a computer programmer that has a diploma in Microelectronics and informatics and i have succeeded one year of mathematics at university level, and i have learned english fast in about 5 months to be able to write here about my thoughts, and now i speak arab and english and french.. What is also political philosophy ? I am an experienced programmer in parallel programming, and in parallel programming there is an important criterion that is scalability, so you have to scale more the system, i have taken a lot of care to make many of my software programs scalable on multicore systems, politics also is the same, you have to know how to prove using logic and measure to make the others believe you an follow you, this is also about scalability, this is why you have seen me taking care of some variables to better optimize the system, you have to understand that compassion and respect and love is also optimization of the system and it's also more efficiency. so it is also more poser and more virility, but if you think that love and compassion and respect have to come with feeling , you are not correct, you have to know how to execute rules like executing software instructions to be able to output a result of compassion and/or respect and/or love without the need of feelings, that's what you have to understand about optimization, this is why you are seing me proving to you the variables of compassion and love and respect are mandatoy by standards of today to be better optimized and to better survive. Doing philosophy, the real philosophy is learning how to be organized, because the real philosophy is based on rationality and logic, and rationality and logic is more science, and more science is in fact more organization and more organization is the cause of power and power is the cause of better survival... But walking your way in the real philosophy you will learn that politics must be treated like programming safe critical systems, so this prerequisite will push you towards more maturity doing more science, because science is also the light and you have to love the light.. If you are not organized like this, you will risk weakness and degenerescence, this is why before i have written to you my thoughts i have done more philosophy.. You can let it as it is, but becareful of your animal instincts, but what is animal instincts? if you are not objective it is also like animal instincts, if you are not logic and rationality, it is also like animal instincts, weakness is also like animal instincts, so you have to be wise and know how to avoid the weakness of those animal instincts , this is why you will notice that i am taking care of my thoughts, please reread my following thoughts carefully to be able to notice it: What is doing philosophy ? I think doing philosophy, the real philosophy has as a goal to know the essence of things.. Doing philosophy is like learning how to walk and how to talk and how to construct.. Doing philosophy is understanding the weakness of your animal instincts.. Doing philosophy is an act also of feeling what is science , because philosophy has participated to the construction of the mathematical tool that is logic. Doing philosophy is feeling better the essence of life and the essence of things, this permits you to transcend better your living conditions.. So doing philosophy is a noble act that you have to treat with respect by constraining it with rationality and wisdom.. Doing philosophy has one of the requirement of science, it is that you have to be patiant in searching for the truth and you have to be patiant to not hurt or harm.. This is what i have learned about philosophy, please reread my following thoughts that i have corrected to understand better the essence of science: The essence of Science.. I am a computer programmer that has a diploma in Microelectronics and informatics and i have succeeded one year of mathematics at university level, and i have learned english fast in about 5 months to be able to write here about my thoughts, and now i speak arab and english and french.. Science is the tool by excellence to attain a higher degree of quality. Science is not maximization of profit, or saying that arabs are less beautiful than white europeans and starting to discriminate them, this is intellectual inferiority that must be dealt with with wisdom, and wisdom is also using science as a tool to attain a higher degree of quality, you have to relearn how to know about the basic requirements and prerequisites to better survive and to better the system, i think some of you here are still immature and are not wisdom and they are not science and they are less disciplined in there thinking, but why science and why wisdom ? you will say that our living conditions are not still well enough to be capable of respecting correctly the requirements and the prerequisites, but this is inferiority, because even if we are not still happy over this planet, a lesser requirement is to not degenerate also towards destruction and stupid violence, this is like programming safe critical systems, and it needs those high standards, so responsability does come with a price, that is more intellectual effort and more effort.. About a mandatory requirement... In philosophy and science there is a mandatory requirement, it is that we have to analyse better and we have to search better and we have to be patiant to not hurt or harm the system.. this is also a prerequisite requirement to be able to program safe critical systems.. If you say that arabs are less beautiful than white europeans and you start to discriminate them, this is not the high standards of science, our world is interconnected and you have to be more disciplined to avoid to hurt and harm the economy or hurt and harm the security, and better security and better economy are caused by many variables such as outsourcing and economic integration and economic investments and by compassion and by love and by respect, this is why you have to be more disciplined and know how to execute rules that output respect and/or compassion and/or love towards arabs , to be more optimized and to better the system. And about the essence of life... Why do you think i am here ? I am disciplined and internet for me is a tool that i have also to respect by making it more valuable, so i am treating politics like programming safe critical systems, so it is why you are seing me getting serious about some variables, being compassion can be virility and efficiency, and compassion is not just a feeling , it is also executing rules that gives an output of compassion, but for a narrow view it is not, so you have to set your mindset correctly, you have to learn how to program safe critical systems as i have more learned to be able to think more correctly, you will notice for example that i am constructing incrementally my thoughts and finally it results in a more consistent posts , because strongness and more quality don't come from the sky, it can be constructed incrementally layer by layer as we are doing it we computer programmers, also when you are progamming safe critical systems it's like the high standards of science, you have to know how to be patiant to not hurt or harm the system, it is a prerequisite of science, this wisdom is a prerequisite for the standards of today , yesterday was yesterday , but today is today , so you have to be wiser and more disciplined because discipline is a prerequisite to be more organized and to be more organized is a prerequisite to be more power that knows how to survive better and knows how to solve our problems, so about the essence of discipline and organization here is what i have written: Do you think stupid violence is discipline and organization ? Surviving better must be guided better by optimizing better and this a mandatory requirement, it is mandatory for reason, but stupid violence is not reason, so we have to treat it like foolishness ! do you think i am stupid to talk as i am talking ? when i say to you love and respect and compassion you will answer that we can not love easily or we can not be compassion easily or we can not be respect easily, because of our difficult living conditions, but this is not wisdom and this is not intelligence, even though love and respect and compassion is not easy, you have to know that Love and respect and compassion can emerge also from a disciplined acts that execute rules like executing instructions of a software, the result and the output is love and compassion and respect, this is how i am disciplined, this is why you have seen me calling Ray Kurzweil a director at Google our beloved and beautiful jew, i am not following individual egoism or following stupidly nationalism, i am following rationality and logic to better optimize and to better optimize my thinking, and i think that my thoughts were rationality and logic also, this is why i am following them and i am not neglecting the variables of love and compassion and respect. So be wiser and smart.. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Ramine <toto@toto.net>: Feb 22 02:42PM -0500 Hello, I am a white arab... I have explained with 2 + 2 = 4 that the "consciousness" And "consequence" of "understanding", then once that you build a hierarchy of ideas and Logical relations and by also measure, then you will be able to understand mathematical equality Of 2 + 2 = 4, and once you understand that, at this very precise moment that you understand mathematical equality 2 + 2 = 4, then you will be ultimately conscious Of the mathematical equality of 2 + 2 = 4, that is why I have said that the process of consciousness is much simpler than the process of intelligence in action, so I hope that my argumentation is clear. Now there remains something to be explained is that even if the process of intelligence in action has not been easy for humanity, the fact that a human being understands the mathematical equality of 2 + 2 = 4, then this understanding will greatly reduce complexity and let us see the "truth" as it really is, a child who tries initially to understand the the mathematical equality of 2 + 2 = 4 will see this process as being "difficult", but is that really "truth"? I do not believe because the understanding of the essence of what is "truth" tells us that truth can only be reached when there is complete comprehension of a process or a thing, then the perception of the child who sees in the beginning of the process of understanding the mathematical equality of 2 + 2 = 4 as being "difficult" is not the truth, it is rather the perception of the one who understood "completely" the mathematical equality of 2 + 2 = 4 and which tells us that equality is easy which is the truth. I have spoken of the understanding of the very essence of what is the truth, for example, when you look at the door of a car, can you say that it's a car ? I do not think, it's who looks and understands everything that is Car that can say it's a car! do you understand ? Then, in my opinion, it can be inferred that it is understanding of a process or thing that greatly reduce or erase "complexity" and which reveals to us the truth, It is like this for the mathematical equality of 2 + 2 = 4 If a child in the beginning tries to understand this equality, he will say that the mathematical equality is "difficult", but is that the truth? I think no, because it's like the example of the car which I have just given you, it is once the understanding of equality is complete that it will greatly reduce or erase the "complexity" and will confirm that the equality is truly "easy", and This is the truth and that is the veridic perception and this is the very essence of truth. So if you have understood what I'm trying to explain, Is that we could say that mathematics is easy and simple, our universe is easy and simple and any thing or process is easy and simple, But it is because we are limited intellectually or physically that we do not understand it, i see this as in an axis of reality, i mean that the complexity of mathematics and knowledge of mathematics is 0.1 on a scale of 100, and we are still weaker at 0.001 on a scale of 100 , even though knowledge of the universe and mathematics is easy, we feel this as difficult. But my point of view is not complete, I will present my other reasoning: We can say, for example, that to define what a car is, we have to "understand" what a car is, then we can therefore affirm that the completeness of knowledge of the car brings us to understand in a perfect way what is a car .. now the important question in logic is: is it possible to state the same thing about the variable of the "complexity" of comprehension, that is to say: perfect knowledge leads us to understand the very nature of the complexity of knowledge, as in the case of the car i have just given you above, because it is the one who really knows the car who can define the car, can we say the same thing about the complexity of understanding? does it is the one who really knows knowledge that can say what is the complexity of the understanding of this knowledge? Do you understand my problem that use logic effectively to solve this problem? As in the problem of the car, above, what can we say about the heaviness or the size of the car which characterizes the car, we can say that it is the one who has knowledge about the car and who understands the car that can accurately state what the heaviness or the size of the car, but can we say the same thing about the characteristic which is called the "Complexity" of understanding? I mean that by analogy, if complexity is the characteristic of the size of the car and if comprehension is the understanding of the car, can we say the same thing and say that the completeness of understanding can be defined only when there is more complete understanding and that greatly reduce or erase complexity because when you understand more fully this leads us to say that understanding is easy? I think that to solve this problem it is necessary to look that in the case of the car, the size and the heaviness are not of the variables of the "comprehension" function, whereas in the case of complexity, comprehension is, on the other hand, a variable of the complexity of comprehension, so these are two different problems, so that the nature of the complexity of Comprehension is relative to comprehension, since comprehension is a variable of the complexity of comprehension, so the problem is better solved in this way and complexity should be seen as a function of comprehension, and more there is comprehension and more there is understand and more there is less complexity of understanding. And now here is my definitive proof and solution to this problem: As you noted in my second reasoning, I have concluded that understanding is a variable of complexity of understanding, for the more there is comprehension the more there is less complexity of understanding. The problem is not resolved as we can assert that understanding is the theoretical representation of the car example that i have given above, but since the more we understand theoretically the car, the more there is less complexity of understanding, so we can say that the theoretical representation of the understanding of the car system is easy, but this is not true because, first of all, there is a contradiction, since two theoretical systems, one which is more complex and another that is less complex system, can both become as easy when there is definitive understanding, and since the mechanism of awareness of the theoretical understanding of the understanding of the car system rely on the speed of our brain, that means that when you remember an understanding in your brain, the brain is quick in its computation to do it, and This rapidity of computation of the brain makes us see comprehension as easy, for example, when you look at an equality of 2 + 2 = 4, your brain has already understood this equality before when you were still a child, but when you look at this equality now, the brain brings back the understanding of this equality and it does so quickly , and this is what does our brain, you do not have to understand the equality yet again, no, the brain makes a quick computation and brings you back the understanding of this equality quickly, that's what makes it easy to understand the theoretical representation of the understanding of the car system, since the theoretical representation of the understanding of the system of a car is brought back quickly by the brain in the form of an understanding of the parts of the theoretical system of the car, as in the case of 2 + 2 = 4, and this shows us the theoretical representation of understanding of the system of the car as being easy, it is the brain that is fast and which facilitates because of its speed of computation as in the case of 2 + 2 = 4.. so the ease of understanding is a consequence of the speed of computation of the brain, so it is not the theoretical representation of the understanding of the car system that is easy. Thus I believe that the problem is definitely resolved by my logical and effective reasoning. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Ramine <toto@toto.net>: Feb 22 02:38PM -0500 Hello...... I am a white arab... Now I will give my explanation of what is consciousness... I hope that in my previous messages you have understood my explanation of how the consciousness of time is generated by our brain, I have said that the brain has a sense of direction that makes it possible to say that one object is left or on the right and back or front etc., and the brain is also able to see space in 3 dimensions with the sense of the gaze for example, that is to say to give coordinates as cartesian or polar in three dimensions to objects in the space of reality, and also the brain by means of the sense of touch and the eye is capable of the sense of the measurement of the magnitudes in the space of reality, these are ingredients of the brain which gives birth to the consciousness of time, for consciousness of time means that for two objects that follow each other, we are able to feel the existence in space of the back of the first object (by the sens of the orientation of the brain) Which is for example "nothing", and that one also feels the existence in the space of the back of the second object which is the first object, and that we are therefore able to associate the back of the second object to the word "before", and this is how the consciousness of time is engendered ... now i come to a question even more important, but what is consciousness really? i start with an example so that you can understand what it really is: when you touch your hands with water very hot, you are able to feel the pain and to say that it is you who feel the pain, so the meaning of touch is closely linked to the consciousness of the "I", but Let us return, if you like, to the experiences of a child, you will notice that a necessary condition for the child to be able to learn and understand is to be able to ask the question of "what is", but you see this question has as a necessary condition the consciousness of the self, for when the child arises, question of "what is" is that it would mean: "I would like to know what it is", and the "I would like to know" demonstrates the presence of a consciousness of the pre-ego which guide the questioning of the child, but then what is this awareness of the pre-ego that guides the questioning that makes a consciousness too? Here is my answer: I believe that as in the case of the sense of touch which is in close relationship with the consciousness of the ego, the act of reflection is also a sens as the sens of touch that is able to make us feel that we exist and feel the space in three dimensions, as for touching the very warm water that allows us to feel that the feeling of hot water hurts us ... what would I like to say? that the sens of touch and the sens of smell for example are adjoined to space-time to give a better consciousness of space-time, that is, the ideas we have of space-time are not , for example, just rules of logic, but also are recorded with sensations of touch and other sensations to give a better consciousness, so the act of reflection is not just able to logically reason with simple rules of logic for building more complex logic rules etc. But it is also capable of associating space-time sensations with objects that are displaced in a 3-dimensional world, and therefore my theory makes us see the act of thought as also being also another sens that resembles the sens of touch , this is my explanation of how the consciousness and consciousness of the ego is engendered by the brain. When you say in mathematical logic: A or B How do you think you understand this logical rule? You must go back to your childhood when you were to learn it, you were told for example there are two balls, and you had to take just one and give it back, and the teacher made us understand for example the following: when you want to take two balls you are informed with gestures that it is NO, And when you just take one and turn the ball back, you get to know that it is YES, therefore I affirm that it is thanks to the existence of space-time which is also a consequence of our interior sensation of the space-time which gives the consciousness of space-time, I mean you are able for example with your brain to feel and understand what BEFORE or BEHIND Or LEFT or RIGHT, and you are able to feel the space and to say that it exists and what it is, so you are able to feel the space-time, and this sensation in our brain that we have of space-time helps us to understand the logical rule of: A or B, or the logical rule of: A and B. So let us return to the following theorem in mathematical logic: If A then B, and if B then C, then A then C. So how do you understand the: If A then B? As in my explanation above, you can not understand this rule without being conscious and without feeling space-time, because even if you are a blind person, you can feel your individuality and your singularity which is the consciousness of the ego, and this self-consciousness is a consequence of the sensation in our brain of space-time that allows us to feel that the object which is "WE" is different from other objects etc. Then what makes even the blind man feels the space-time and is capable to say that this object is before that object in time, So it is able to understand the logical rule of: If A then B, and since he is capable of doing so, he is capable, thanks to the sensation of the space-time that we have in our brain, that permit us to understand The following theorem: If A then B, and if B then C, then A then C. This is my evidence based on the empirical facts and this proves that mathematical logic is also a consequence of the sensation that we have in our brain of space-time, without this sensation we can not, in my opinion, understand mathematical logic, and since the machine is incapable of feeling like a human being space-time, then we can not say that artificial intelligence Is capable of achieving the emergence of consciousness. thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Ramine <toto@toto.net>: Feb 22 02:19PM -0500 Hello, Doing philosophy, the real philosophy is learning how to be organized, because the real philosophy is based on rationality and logic, and rationality and logic is more science, and more science is in fact more organization and more organization is the cause of power and power is the cause of better survival... But walking your way in the real philosophy you will learn that politics must be treated like programming safe critical systems, so this prerequisite will push you towards more maturity doing more science, because science is also the light and you have to love the light.. If you are not organized like this, you will risk weakness and degenerescence, this is why before i have written to you my thoughts i have done more philosophy.. You can let it as it is, but becareful of your animal instincts, but what is animal instincts? if you are not objective it is also like animal instincts, if you are not logic and rationality, it is also like animal instincts, weakness is also like animal instincts, so you have to be wise and know how to avoid the weakness of those animal instincts , this is why you will notice that i am taking care of my thoughts, please reread my following thoughts carefully to be able to notice it: What is doing philosophy ? I think doing philosophy, the real philosophy has as a goal to know the essence of things.. Doing philosophy is like learning how to walk and how to talk and how to construct.. Doing philosophy is understanding the weakness of your animal instincts.. Doing philosophy is an act also of feeling what is science , because philosophy has participated to the construction of the mathematical tool that is logic. Doing philosophy is feeling better the essence of life and the essence of things, this permits you to transcend better your living conditions.. So doing philosophy is a noble act that you have to treat with respect by constraining it with rationality and wisdom.. Doing philosophy has one of the requirement of science, it is that you have to be patiant in searching for the truth and you have to be patiant to not hurt or harm.. This is what i have learned about philosophy, please reread my following thoughts that i have corrected to understand better the essence of science: The essence of Science.. I am a computer programmer that has a diploma in Microelectronics and informatics and i have succeeded one year of mathematics at university level, and i have learned english fast in about 5 months to be able to write here about my thoughts, and now i speak arab and english and french.. Science is the tool by excellence to attain a higher degree of quality. Science is not maximization of profit, or saying that arabs are less beautiful than white europeans and starting to discriminate them, this is intellectual inferiority that must be dealt with with wisdom, and wisdom is also using science as a tool to attain a higher degree of quality, you have to relearn how to know about the basic requirements and prerequisites to better survive and to better the system, i think some of you here are still immature and are not wisdom and they are not science and they are less disciplined in there thinking, but why science and why wisdom ? you will say that our living conditions are not still well enough to be capable of respecting correctly the requirements and the prerequisites, but this is inferiority, because even if we are not still happy over this planet, a lesser requirement is to not degenerate also towards destruction and stupid violence, this is like programming safe critical systems, and it needs those high standards, so responsability does come with a price, that is more intellectual effort and more effort.. About a mandatory requirement... In philosophy and science there is a mandatory requirement, it is that we have to analyse better and we have to search better and we have to be patiant to not hurt or harm the system.. this is also a prerequisite requirement to be able to program safe critical systems.. If you say that arabs are less beautiful than white europeans and you start to discriminate them, this is not the high standards of science, our world is interconnected and you have to be more disciplined to avoid to hurt and harm the economy or hurt and harm the security, and better security and better economy are caused by many variables such as outsourcing and economic integration and economic investments and by compassion and by love and by respect, this is why you have to be more disciplined and know how to execute rules that output respect and/or compassion and/or love towards arabs , to be more optimized and to better the system. And about the essence of life... Why do you think i am here ? I am disciplined and internet for me is a tool that i have also to respect by making it more valuable, so i am treating politics like programming safe critical systems, so it is why you are seing me getting serious about some variables, being compassion can be virility and efficiency, and compassion is not just a feeling , it is also executing rules that gives an output of compassion, but for a narrow view it is not, so you have to set your mindset correctly, you have to learn how to program safe critical systems as i have more learned to be able to think more correctly, you will notice for example that i am constructing incrementally my thoughts and finally it results in a more consistent posts , because strongness and more quality don't come from the sky, it can be constructed incrementally layer by layer as we are doing it we computer programmers, also when you are progamming safe critical systems it's like the high standards of science, you have to know how to be patiant to not hurt or harm the system, it is a prerequisite of science, this wisdom is a prerequisite for the standards of today , yesterday was yesterday , but today is today , so you have to be wiser and more disciplined because discipline is a prerequisite to be more organized and to be more organized is a prerequisite to be more power that knows how to survive better and knows how to solve our problems, so about the essence of discipline and organization here is what i have written: Do you think stupid violence is discipline and organization ? Surviving better must be guided better by optimizing better and this a mandatory requirement, it is mandatory for reason, but stupid violence is not reason, so we have to treat it like foolishness ! do you think i am stupid to talk as i am talking ? when i say to you love and respect and compassion you will answer that we can not love easily or we can not be compassion easily or we can not be respect easily, because of our difficult living conditions, but this is not wisdom and this is not intelligence, even though love and respect and compassion is not easy, you have to know that Love and respect and compassion can emerge also from a disciplined acts that execute rules like executing instructions of a software, the result and the output is love and compassion and respect, this is how i am disciplined, this is why you have seen me calling Ray Kurzweil a director at Google our beloved and beautiful jew, i am not following individual egoism or following stupidly nationalism, i am following rationality and logic to better optimize and to better optimize my thinking, and i think that my thoughts were rationality and logic also, this is why i am following them and i am not neglecting the variables of love and compassion and respect. So be wiser and smart.. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| b.ozerkins@gmail.com: Feb 22 11:00AM -0800 On Tuesday, March 23, 2010 at 5:28:48 PM UTC+2, Peter Olcott wrote: > the front of the FIFO queue. The only web-servers that I am > currently considering have source code available. > I would like suggestions for implementing this architecture. Or you could simply use http://stormmq.com/ or https://www.justfuse.org/ as a service. And don't bother ^^ |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment