- My other thoughts on politics - 1 Update
- About neo-nazis and supremacists... - 1 Update
- About America... - 1 Update
- About an important subject in philosophy... - 1 Update
- Reread i correct - 1 Update
- About technical matters... - 1 Update
| Ramine <toto@toto.net>: Feb 19 05:22PM -0500 Hello, I am a white arab... About political philosophy of the world order.. How can you construct the the world order ? We must not be childish and think that that world order is constructed by just thinking America , because the variables of compassion and respect are also the cause of world order and the cause of more optimization of the economy.. so we have not to be irresponsable and think Europe without the rest of the world, or think America without the rest of the world.. Also i have said that: I have noticed that many here are seing Donald Trump like a powerful man, like a King or something like that , but you have not to commit an error and think that it's Donald Trump that will make America great again, because Donald Trump is only just one person , it's America and the world that will make America great again, because how can we imagine America alone without the rest of the world !? the rest of the world is also important for the variable of security and for economy that will make America great again. About Machism and politics.. Donald Trump is a more machist man.. But we have to be not childish.. Machism causes lack of compassion and lack of respect, because machism is more violent, so how can machism bring world order and more security !? how by thinking just America can we solve our problems !? you have to be more moderate than Donald Trump to make America more responsable, because responsability by the standards of today is also compassion and respect that cause order and security and cause more optimization or better economy.. so being more machist without constraining machism with wisdom and compassion and respect is a big mistake ! About the essence of machism.. America has chosen a more machist man called Donald Trump.. Why then can we choose a more machist man that is more narcissistic and more violent ? Power is a characteristic that comes more often with machism So then America has thought that it has chosen a more powerful man that brings more power to America, because power is a characteristic that comes more often with machism, Hitler also was a more machist man that was thought to be more powerful and then was thought to solve the problems of Germany, but this kind of thinking comes with a defect, because i am a software programmer , and i say that more machist man like Donald Trump bring more violence like bringing more extremist nationalism around the world and thus it hurts the variable of security , thus it hurts the world order and can also hurt the economy, because economy is not saying: "we will think from now on America first", like is saying Donald Trump, because this is a machist thinking, because you have not to say it like that to others and the rest of the world, because others will hate you for saying that, and thus this will or can hurt economy also. So we have not to be childish and think smart. I am a white arab.. Our beloved jews... Why i am saying our beloved jews ? It's like you have not to say: "from now on we will only think America first", like is saying Donald Trump.. Because you have to be smart.. Because you have to construct from now on your tomorrow and your future, and our tomorrow and our future , and our tomorrow and future has to be thought by thinking that more extremist nationalism like the Likud in Israel and more extremist nationalism like that of Donald Trump, must be moderated more, to not cause more extremist nationlism around the world, because this will hurt economy and this will hurt security and this will hurt the world order philosophy. This is why i am saying our beloved jews, to moderate more the Likud of Israel that i think are commiting a big mistake by being more extremist with there more extremist nationalism. So be wiser and be smart people ! Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Ramine <toto@toto.net>: Feb 19 05:20PM -0500 Hello....... About neo-nazis and supremacists... They are getting stupid, because neo-nazis type of ideologies have attracted more violent white europeans type of people, but the defect is that they are getting less and less science or no science, so they are wasting our time, because less and less science or no science is like being an homosexual that is interpreted like lacking wisdom, and wisdom is also more science and science, and more science and science and more logic and measure is all more maturity and more virility, so i don't think that the interpretation of neo-nazis type of ideologies that lack science and lack logic and measure is correct because that's there living conditions because they are just doing affirmations that jews are animals and arabs are animals without giving rigorous scientific proofs, and that's waste of our time, so we have to think twice and consider the living conditions of neo-nazis type of people like being inferiority, thus this inferiority is like being a negro, so think twice and be wiser and smarter. Being a homosexual.. Being a homosexual is also interpreted as being less wisdom, this is why you are seing many on soc.culture.israel calling neo-nazis: homosexuals, it is not that they are homosexuals, it is because that being more science and being more logic and measure is also more maturity and more virility, so when you lack science and you lack logic and measure it is as you are an homosexual, this is why you are seing some jews of soc.culture.israel calling neo-nazis of soc.culture.israel homosexuals, because they lack science and logic and measure. My advice that is a wisdom too... You have to consider being more science and being more logic and measure to be more virility and more maturity, this requirement is the basis of doing philosophy, you can not do political philosophy without this prerequisite, because it is the essence of quality that dictates it, look for example at Hitler, he was not a scientist and he was not a technical software programmer, so he was lacking on his morality, because the basis of morality is also understanding, and understanding does come with a price that is more intellectual effort and more effort , and more intellectual effort and more effort must be also science or more science.. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Ramine <toto@toto.net>: Feb 19 04:31PM -0500 Hello....... I am a white arab.. America and Israel are tempted to believe and they believe and follow that maximization and optimization is power, and power is capable, we are tempted to believe it as that, i understand America and i don't think that America is evil for that, but America has to think twice and read my following thoughts: About an important subject in philosophy... We have to be smart, America is more oriented towards optimization and maximization and performance, but is it a good philosophy ? I think that this subject is one of the most important philosophical subject... Morality is composed of a priori pure moral and empirical moral.. But if you are mostly oriented towards a priori pure moral that is constructed by reason , so you will lack efficiency, because reason alone can not solve our problems, that means that the supporters of maximization and optimization philosophy are not in the right way, if you say for example: 2*x + 2*x = 4*x, that's also mathematics and that's also more efficiency but optimization and maximization of mathematics is not sufficient, because science must take into account the variables of love and respect and compassion to better optimize the system, it's like programming safe critical systems, because neglecting the variables of love and respect and compassion causes desorder and causes violence and causes extremism. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Ramine <toto@toto.net>: Feb 19 03:40PM -0500 Hello.... I am a white arab.. About an important subject in philosophy... We have to be smart, America is more oriented towards optimization and maximization and performance, but is it a good philosophy ? I think that this subject is one of the most important philosophical subject... Morality is composed of a priori pure moral and empirical moral.. But if you are mostly oriented towards a priori moral that is constructed by reason , so you will lack efficiency, because reason alone can not solve our problems, that means that the supporters of maximization and optimization philosophy are not in the right way, if you say for example: 2*x + 2*x = 4*x, that's also mathematics and that's also more efficiency but that's not sufficient, because science must take into account the variables of love and respect and compassion to better optimize the system, it's like programming safe critical systems, because neglecting the variables of love and respect and compassion causes desorder and causes violence and causes extremism. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Ramine <toto@toto.net>: Feb 19 02:25PM -0500 Hello....... I am a white arab, and i am a computer programmer and i have a diploma in Microelectronics and informatics and i have also studied and succeeded one year of mathematics at university level.. Please read this: "Just as with normal thread pool usage, the main program thread may create Tasks that will get queued on the global queue (e.g. Task1 and Task2) and threads will grab those Tasks typically in a FIFO manner. Where things diverge is that any new Tasks (e.g. Task3) created in the context of the executing Task (e.g. Task2) end up on a local queue for that thread pool thread." Read more here: http://www.danielmoth.com/Blog/New-And-Improved-CLR-4-Thread-Pool-Engine.aspx You will notice that there is a contention on the global queue from the producer threads and from the consumer threads on the Microsoft CLR Threadpool engine, so that's not good. But please look at the source code of my Threadpool engine that scales well, it does eliminate the contention on the consumer threads side by using technics such as lock striping and other technics.. And my efficient threadpool that scales well supports the following: - Now it can use processor groups on windows, so that it can use more than 64 logical processors and it scales well. The following have been added to my efficient Threadpool engine: - The worker threads enters in a wait state when there is no job in the concurrent FIFO queues - for more efficiency - - You can distribute your jobs to the worker threads and call any method with the threadpool's execute() method. - It uses work-stealing to be more efficient. - You can configure it to use stacks or FIFO queues , when you use stacks it will be cache efficient. - Now it can use processor groups on windows, so that it can use more than 64 logical processors and it scales well. - Now it distributes the jobs on multiple FIFO queues or stacks so that it scales well. - You can wait for the jobs to finish with the wait() method. - It's NUMA-aware and NUMA efficient. You can download it from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-that-scales-awell And you can download my efficient Threadpool engine with priorities that scales well from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-well Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Ramine <toto@toto.net>: Feb 19 02:21PM -0500 Hello.... I am a white arab, and i am a computer programmer and i have a diploma in Microelectronics and informatics and i have also studied and succeeded one year of mathematics at university level.. Please read this: "Just as with normal thread pool usage, the main program thread may create Tasks that will get queued on the global queue (e.g. Task1 and Task2) and threads will grab those Tasks typically in a FIFO manner. Where things diverge is that any new Tasks (e.g. Task3) created in the context of the executing Task (e.g. Task2) end up on a local queue for that thread pool thread." Read more here: http://www.danielmoth.com/Blog/New-And-Improved-CLR-4-Thread-Pool-Engine.aspx You will notice that there is a contention on the global queue from the producer threads and from the consumer threads on the Microsoft CLR Threadpool engine, so that's not good. But please look at the source code of my Threadpool engine that scales well, it does eliminate the contention on the consumer threads side by using technics such as lock-striping and other technics.. And my efficient threadpool that scales well supports the following: - Now it can use processor groups on windows, so that it can use more than 64 logical processors and it scales well. The following have been added to my efficient Threadpool engine: - The worker threads enters in a wait state when there is no job in the concurrent FIFO queues - for more efficiency - - You can distribute your jobs to the worker threads and call any method with the threadpool's execute() method. - It uses work-stealing to be more efficient. - You can configure it to use stacks or FIFO queues , when you use stacks it will be cache efficient. - Now it can use processor groups on windows, so that it can use more than 64 logical processors and it scales well. - Now it distributes the jobs on multiple FIFO queues or stacks so that it scales well. - You can wait for the jobs to finish with the wait() method. - It's NUMA-aware and NUMA efficient. You can download it from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-that-scales-well And you can download my efficient Threadpool engine with priorities that scales well from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-well Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment