Friday, March 17, 2017

Digest for comp.lang.c++@googlegroups.com - 12 updates in 10 topics

"Öö Tiib" <ootiib@hot.ee>: Mar 17 04:26PM -0700

On Friday, 17 March 2017 03:22:42 UTC+2, Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
> The noise level in clc++ is increasing again.
 
Here are people who like to shit into well from what others drink.
Perhaps it is punishment but the point of it will remain forever
missing for me. Why does Rick C. Hodgin shit into drinking well?
Why does Amine Moulay Ramdane? It is proof that here exists no God.
It can't be that some God made such pointless, annoying people.
Ramine <toto@toto.net>: Mar 17 06:44PM -0400

Hello,
 
About C++ and Object Pascal..
 
I have programmed with Object Pascal(with Delphi and FreePacal
compilers) since 1996, and what i have found that Object Pascal is more
beautiful language than C++ and it's powerful, this is why i love to
program in Delphi or FreePascal, but i have learned fast C++ and i have
found that C++ is good also because i was already an experienced
programmer, also i have noticed that when you compile a header in C++
and you don't use all your functions from the header, C++ compiler will
not compile all the header, Delphi and Freepascal are better because
when you compile a unit they will compile all the unit.
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Ramine <toto@toto.net>: Mar 17 06:52PM -0400

On 3/17/2017 6:44 PM, Ramine wrote:
> and you don't use all your functions from the header, C++ compiler will
> not compile all the header, Delphi and Freepascal are better because
> when you compile a unit they will compile all the unit.
 
 
I have said that Delphi and FreePascal are better at compiling units
because they compile all the unit and they compile very fast, much
faster than C++..
 
 
Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: Mar 17 11:19PM

On 17/03/2017 22:52, Ramine wrote:
 
> I have said that Delphi and FreePascal are better at compiling units
> because they compile all the unit and they compile very fast, much
> faster than C++..
 
As a general rule the faster a programming language takes to compile the
slower the resulting executable will be when run.
 
C++ allows complexity to be pulled from run-time to compile-time
(traditionally with templates but now with constexpr).
 
/Flibble
Ramine <toto@toto.net>: Mar 17 07:12PM -0400

Hello,
 
Another deficiency of C++ compilers..
 
When you compile your projects you have to include the static libraries
in the makefile for example, but in Delphi and FreePascal you don't need
to because they will link them automaticaly for you.
 
Delphi and FreePascal compilers are newer than C++ compilers,
but C++ compilers have inherited deficiencies of the past.
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Ramine <toto@toto.net>: Mar 17 07:00PM -0400

Hello,
 
 
I have noticed that C++ compilers have inherited deficiencies of the
past, because you can not change the memory manager easily and
efficiently, but in Delphi and FreePascal it is easy to do it.
 
Look at my nedmalloc interfaces for Delphi and Delphi XE versions and
FreePascal:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/nedmalloc-interfaces-for-delphi-and-delphi-xe-versions-and-freepascal
 
 
It's easy to install this scalable memory manager in Delphi and
FreePascal compilers and it's efficient to install it, but in C++
compilers it's not.
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Ramine <toto@toto.net>: Mar 17 05:38PM -0400

Hello....
 
 
I think that nationalism like neo-nazism is a bad idea, because read this:
 
"The economic models developed by the development economists of the
1960s, based on the idea of industrializing industries, seem to be
losing more and more of their unconditional supporters. The economic
development of a country or a region is no longer Dependent on the
development of the secondary sector or heavy industry. "
by M'Fadel El Halaissi, of which our readers are familiar, is Deputy
Chief Executive Officer of BMCE Bank.
 
 
Please read more here(you have to translate it from french to english,
because it is in french), it's from the Economist Magazine in Morocco
my country:
 
http://www.leconomiste.com/article/915791-la-conqu-te-conomique-de-l-afrique-passe-par-le-secteur-des-servicespar-m-fadel-el-ha
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard): Mar 17 09:06PM

[Please do not mail me a copy of your followup]
 
*PLONK*
 
If you would just stop replying, those of us with proper filtering
wouldn't even see you bitching.
 
So, since you also have no impulse control, welcome to my KILL file.
 
It's been getting pretty damned big in this group. So pathetic.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals-wiki.org>
The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org>
Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>
Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: Mar 17 08:15PM

Colour emojis implemented in "neoGFX" my C++ GUI/game library:
 
http://neogfx.org/temp/emoji.png
 
/Flibble
Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com>: Mar 18 08:29AM +1300

On 03/18/17 07:41 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:
 
> Rick is in my killfile but people still reply to his posts and those
> replies aren't blocked by my killfile.
 
Change your Thunderbird filter to "ignore sub-thread".
 
--
Ian
Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee>: Mar 17 09:27PM +0200

On 17.03.2017 17:39, David Brown wrote:
 
> I believe you are correct there.
 
> Certainly it is rarely a good idea to modify the variable you are
> looping over from within the loop.
 
In this particular code snippet there is nothing suspicious, there are
no iterators whose values are preserved over the erase() call.
 
I bet the problems are in the code the OP has not shown.
Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee>: Mar 17 09:21PM +0200

On 17.03.2017 17:59, Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
 
> I think you misunderstand.
 
> Manfred is not talking about the usual elision but about the
> `std::vector`'s choice about what to call.
 
I just wanted to stress than for a sanely written program there would be
no difference (other than performance-wise, potentially) what
std::vector decides to call or not to call when resizing the buffer.
 
Maybe I should expand my opinion a bit more: any program whose semantics
depend on the copy or move constructors called or not called, or having
exception-throwing move constructors or destructors, is extremely fragile.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)