Friday, March 31, 2017

Digest for comp.lang.c++@googlegroups.com - 5 updates in 4 topics

Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se>: Mar 31 06:32PM

On Thu, 2017-03-30, Richard wrote:
 
>>> That sounds to me like you haven't tried to do what you suggest
 
>>What do I suggest?
 
> Do you not even know what you posted or can't read it above?
 
(I don't think you mean "copying the source code", since we have tools
like rsync to do that quickly these days.)
 
I suggested using a Makefile, but if you insinuate that I haven't
tried that, that's trivially false. Of course I have tried it; I use
make for all my projects. I've also used it to speed up and clarify
other projects' build processses, too. I remember speeding up one
build from 20 minutes to around twelve seconds.
 
I'm active looking for valid, technical reasons to use something else,
but haven't found any so far. Modulo the "I'm not Linus" bit;
projects like the Linux kernel definitely need something else.
 
/Jorgen
 
--
// Jorgen Grahn <grahn@ Oo o. . .
\X/ snipabacken.se> O o .
woodbrian77@gmail.com: Mar 31 03:52PM -0700

On Friday, March 31, 2017 at 1:33:02 PM UTC-5, Jorgen Grahn wrote:
 
> I'm active looking for valid, technical reasons to use something else,
> but haven't found any so far. Modulo the "I'm not Linus" bit;
> projects like the Linux kernel definitely need something else.
 
Make works reasonably well for me now that I've put more
work into it. It's kind of a pain to have one makefile
for BSD/Linux/etc and another for Windows, but I've put
up with that for years.
 
My build takes around 14 seconds on my laptop and that's
doing a
 
make all example
 
I'm not sure if it would be better to include the example
target in all or leave it separate.
 
 
Brian
Ebenezer Enterprises
http://webEbenezer.net
"Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid>: Mar 30 10:50PM -0700

On 3/25/2017 8:29 AM, fir wrote:
 
>>> This is why i am not seeking at discussing C++ with you on this forum.
 
>> Why are you here?
 
> ramine idiot is here to spam - to make advertisments of his idiot state to everybody
 
Damn.
Jeff-Relf.Me @.: Mar 30 08:21PM -0700

bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net>: Mar 30 08:46PM -0400

On 03/30/2017 09:49 AM, bitrex wrote:
> struct is placed in it via placement new. Then another class wraps that,
> and using the CRTP ensures that each child class has its own copy of the
> buffer (rather than one being shared among all the subclasses.)
 
<snip>
 
Disregard, this code's all wrong.
 
Lemme get back to you...
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

No comments: