- About politics and optimization - 1 Update
- Here is my political model - 1 Update
rami17 <rami17@rami17.net>: Apr 09 12:32PM -0400 Hello........ How to transcend the divide between the shiites and the sunnites in Irak? By optimization ! You have to know how to optimize economy too to be more powerful and more organized, and the prerequisites is transcendence of this kind of inferiority that lack optimization. Morality is the same , it permit us to transcend , because it gets us more organized and more efficient to better survive, and because science is part of morality, because is laws part of morality ? yes, because science also rules us with rules of optimization that has as a goal to give more quality and more happiness to the people, so this is part of good, so we have to enlarge our conception of what is morality, thus including science as a part of morality is part of the game today, this is part of the high standards of today, this view is also enforced with the fact also that thinking bigger like thinking how to be more scalable or as to be more organized world wide or as to be world order and security is an essential part of requirements of today, but it's necessary to know also that taking science alone as morality is corruption , because science with more maximization and more optimization can neglect the weakers among us , so science can be a kind of horror like the horror of nazism, so please be wiser and reread my following full text to understand better my views: About Stability and world order.. How to get stability and world order ? You have to stabilize and secure the country also, and this has to be done by searching for the rules to execute that avoid extremism and violence, this is mandatory for our democracies, so i have told you to notice that neglecting compassion and/or love and/or respect cause violence and extremism and desorder, so you have not to neglect them , and you have to know how to higher consumer confidence index to better optimize economy world wide, so for that you have to know how to avoid hate towards other people that causes problems to economy , because it hurts consumer confidence index, and you have to know to not get into communism and to avoid extremism of communism because communism is too extreme and its extremism causes violence, so you have to know how to tune those variables of compassion and respect and love and how to optimize the system, and how to do it ? by being for example more social like being social democracy and or being social Liberalism, and here is what i have said about immigration: In parallel computer programming we have to optimize, like by reducing the size of the serial part, and by reducing the cache coherence traffic etc. and this to render your software or algorithm scalable, so we are concerned by the scalability criterion.. Capitalism also wants to optimize, and capitalism says for example that even arabs are not as beautiful as white europeans, it says that arabs are tolerable, because capitalism wants to optimize economy and the society by bringing arabs immigrants that are also decent people, because today we are constrained by many factors, and optimization has been rendered by those constrains to as the following: If you are useful for something like jobs and economy or/and useful to low birth rate of white europeans or/and you are useful to higher the consumer confidence index and/or and you are useful to better the world order and security , you can be welcome to USA or other countries.. About America and the world.. Before, operating systems like OS/2 of IBM were a monolithic OSs , but as the time has gone by we have developed more sophisticated OSs like Mach 3 or Windows NT, those sophisticated OSs were more decentralized and were designed in a such a way to be more efficient and managed better, the difference between a monolithic one and not monolithic one is like programming with message passing or Object oriented programming, and we have also the tendency to decentralize the management of our societies to be more efficient, it's the same for capitalism , capitalism tries to optimize better by not being as monolithic as the old way of thinking of Hitler, so today because of constrains on optimization, usefulness is interpreted not as being as beautiful as white europeans or being as civilized as white europeans to better optimize the system economically.. it's like decentralizing to better optimize, now to not get extremist, you have to know how to tune correctly optimization to better optimize and to not cause problems to societies. And how can we be more civilized ? I have done philosophy.. We have to measure it easily to know about it.. Science in fact is part of morality, but science alone as morality is corruption of morality, because science is also performance and power that dictates to survive better, so then it dictates to neglect the weakers among us, so then this is corruption of morality that permit us to measure corruption of morality and thus to measure civilization, but i repeat that science is part of morality , because performance and power of science that solves our problems is also good, so this good is part of morality, and we can measure civilization and morality by the degree of the variable that is suffering, and you will measure morality by the Ideal of justice and ideal of happiness that are part of our essence, and that permit us to measure morality or measure civilization, And empirical moral constrain performance and power to not neglect the variables of compassion and respect and love because neglecting them causes violence and/or extremism and/or desorder, and this permit us also to measure morality or measure civilization. This is how we can measure morality and measure civilization. So we have to be careful to not repeat foolishness of the past. The ideal of justice and ideal of happiness.. If you say that this life is not fair and juste, that's not a measure, because you have to measure the degree of suffering and the degree of responsability, that means that justice must constrain happiness, but justice must be constrained by responsability too, but how can we constrain justice by responsability ? responsability can be interpreted being principales of communism or being principales of social democracy etc. so the the degree of tolerance is also a variable that influence responsability, so if we are more tolerance we can refuse the principales of communism because communism is a kind of justice that is too extreme that can cause extremism and violence, so the tolerance of social democracy or the tolerance of social Liberalism are more apt to not cause extremism and violence and social democracy or social Liberalism knows how to tune compassion and love and respect so that to be decent compassion and love and respect , and so that to not cause extremism and violence and desorder too. About the essence of corruption of morality.. It's like doing philosophy.. You will say that since life is still unjust and not fair, so how can we be still morality ? or how can you still speak of corruption of morality ? since life is a difficult job and since when we are treated unjustly and unfairly by life we have the tendency to neglect high standards of morality. This is not philosophy Sir ! this is stupidity ! Because justice has to constrain happiness.. And responsability has to constrain justice.. But responsability is influenced by the degree of suffering or or by the degree of difficulty, so since life is still a difficult job, so the variables of suffer and difficulty are important, so the higher importance that we give to suffering and to difficulty, because of life is still a difficult job, constrain responsability by making it be more morality not less morality. So stupid people have the tendency to not think correctly. About the essence of responsability.. I have said about morality that: Justice has to constrain happiness.. And responsability has to constrain justice.. But responsability is influenced by the variable of tolerance , so if we are more tolerance we can neglect reponsability and thus neglect justice and neglect morality. And if we are also a kind of tolerance we can avoid the extreme justice of communism. But this is not easy to convince communism, so to be able to convince communism, you have to say to communism that Class Struggle of communism is empirically difficult to realize because it's too much violence, and since it's too much violence, so communism must be avoided because it's too extreme justice that causes too much violence. So we have to be more wisdom to be better at tuning the variable of tolerance to better optimize responsability. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
rami17 <rami17@rami17.net>: Apr 09 12:31PM -0400 Hello........ I will add the following factor to my model: Economic integration with others and also economic investment render the world more stable and more peaceful and more secure, and because consumerism has to guide governance and consumerism is also the consequence of compassion and respect, because to not hurt consumer confidence index you have to know how to be compassion and respect. This is the solution of the problem between Israel and arab countries, they must have more economic integration and more economic investment between them to be more peace and stability. Please read again the rest of my model: With a Top-down approach i have come to an important subject: I have said that: Other than that you have to know how to tune compassion and respect to not hurt consummer confidence index internationally and locally. This is an important factor to be able to tune well the political philosophy that must guide governance, you have also to think governance by knowing how to tune investing into the third world countries, this is mandatory, to be more precise i will say that you have to know that like Fordism, consumerism has also to guide our political philosophy, and consumerism is a consequence of respect and compassion, so this is very serious, and the essence of America is constructed on this fact, so adding this principal to my model will get you on the right path, here is the rest of my model that i have enhanced: About extremist nationalism and communism.. Extremist nationalism like the far-right or neo-nazi political parties is an archaic thinking that causes violence and extremism and instability, communism is the same, so we have to be wiser and understand that this kind of extremism has also to be avoided by knowing the following: "The economic models developed by the development economists of the 1960s, based on the idea of industrializing industries, seem to be losing more and more of their unconditional supporters. The economic development of a country or a region is no longer Dependent on the development of the secondary sector or heavy industry. " by M'Fadel El Halaissi, of which our readers are familiar, is Deputy Chief Executive Officer of BMCE Bank. Please read more here(you have to translate it from french to english, because it is in french), it's from the Economist Magazine in Morocco my country: http://www.leconomiste.com/article/915791-la-conqu-te-conomique-de-l-afrique-passe-par-le-secteur-des-servicespar-m-fadel-el-ha And i have said that efficient thinking is not thinking small.. Efficient thinking is thinking bigger.. You have to think bigger to be able to survive better.. But thinking bigger is not suicidal thinking that causes suffer to the people, suicidal thinking is a nihilist thinking that is not efficient thinking that thinks bigger and that solves problems, so be capable and be responsable and be wise, being wiser is also taking into account the right variables and factors that enhance your living conditions and the living conditions of your children and the people.. So here is again my model that i have enhanced: But we can not have confidence in people, we have to enforce morality with laws, but morality is not something easy , because morality is not just a priori pure moral, morality is infered also from empirical moral that is also from power and counter-power, but we are more lucky today because empirical moral is not so bad, because i have said that: Past was the past, but today it is different, we are getting world stability from the power and the counter-power, so we not just have governance and/or democracy that is the power of people, but also we have the counter-power of the financial and banks institutions that have there rating methodology that take into account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, and we have the counter-power of the consummers confidence index, and this creates a world stability because we have to optimize our economic systems and by being responsable by being also responsable governance, other than that compassion and respect can be virility and they are like mandatory for the system, because compassion and respect gets us more organized because neglecting compassion and respect cause violence and extremism that make our society unstable and less optimized , so tuning compassion and respect right with social services and medical services and with educational services and with help to the people to avoid violence and extremisme is also more stability and more power , so this compassion and respect is virility, other than that you have to know how to tune compassion and respect to not hurt consummer confidence index internationally and locally. And about immigration: Virility and usefulness We have to do more philosophy.. There is some of you who define virility as being courageous or violent.. But this is not the right way to define virility.. You have to define it to know it: Virility is maturity and also it is intelligence and it is money and it is knowledge and it is efficiency etc. Virility is not just being violent or being courageous.. Now can we make this criterion of virility the criterion at how we have to be selected as an immigrant ? I don't think it is the right way.. Because to be accepted as an immigrant we have to be categorized by the criterion of usefulness, this is optimization of today, so to fulfil the goal of economic growth and economic efficiency and to be able to give jobs to the right persons, we have to think by the criterion of usefulness, this is how works USA and this is how works Canada too, even if we select some immigrants taking also into consideration human rights. Knowledge changes your perception.. But quality of knowledge is also very important to set it right.. To overcome many constrains you have to know how to tune some variables, like you have to know how to define usefulness, and this is the weakness of neo-nazis like ideologies, today optimization is defined by the criterion of usefulness, and usefulness is not that arabs have to be as beautiful as white europeans, this is the old way of thinking, so usefulness to conform to the standards of today that take into account efficiency of economy has been defined differently than the neo-nazis kind of thinking, so we have to adapt , because USA and Canada have to optimize there economies taking into account many constrains, because also usefulness is constrained also by contrains and this is why USA and Canada are getting more clever at defining usefulness and usefulness of immigrants to better optimize there economies, so i am calling to all of you to adapt to the reality of today, because the past was the past, and today is today, so please adapt yourself ! And more about the criterion of usefulness.. Optimization today is defined by usefulness.. But do you think that usefulness can be tuned exactly ? No Sir, usefulness is constrained by some constrains that make tuning of usefulness more an approximation than an exact calculation, this is the weakness of the far-right and neo-nazis kind of ideologies, you have to know that tuning usefulness is still an approximation, and this approximation sets optimization that sets immigration. So don't be immature and adapt yourself to today and to science ! Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment