- Here is my political model - 1 Update
- Read again my more precise post - 1 Update
rami17 <rami17@rami17.net>: Apr 09 12:31PM -0400 Hello........ I will add the following factor to my model: Economic integration with others and also economic investment render the world more stable and more peaceful and more secure, and because consumerism has to guide governance and consumerism is also the consequence of compassion and respect, because to not hurt consumer confidence index you have to know how to be compassion and respect. This is the solution of the problem between Israel and arab countries, they must have more economic integration and more economic investment between them to be more peace and stability. Please read again the rest of my model: With a Top-down approach i have come to an important subject: I have said that: Other than that you have to know how to tune compassion and respect to not hurt consummer confidence index internationally and locally. This is an important factor to be able to tune well the political philosophy that must guide governance, you have also to think governance by knowing how to tune investing into the third world countries, this is mandatory, to be more precise i will say that you have to know that like Fordism, consumerism has also to guide our political philosophy, and consumerism is a consequence of respect and compassion, so this is very serious, and the essence of America is constructed on this fact, so adding this principal to my model will get you on the right path, here is the rest of my model that i have enhanced: About extremist nationalism and communism.. Extremist nationalism like the far-right or neo-nazi political parties is an archaic thinking that causes violence and extremism and instability, communism is the same, so we have to be wiser and understand that this kind of extremism has also to be avoided by knowing the following: "The economic models developed by the development economists of the 1960s, based on the idea of industrializing industries, seem to be losing more and more of their unconditional supporters. The economic development of a country or a region is no longer Dependent on the development of the secondary sector or heavy industry. " by M'Fadel El Halaissi, of which our readers are familiar, is Deputy Chief Executive Officer of BMCE Bank. Please read more here(you have to translate it from french to english, because it is in french), it's from the Economist Magazine in Morocco my country: http://www.leconomiste.com/article/915791-la-conqu-te-conomique-de-l-afrique-passe-par-le-secteur-des-servicespar-m-fadel-el-ha And i have said that efficient thinking is not thinking small.. Efficient thinking is thinking bigger.. You have to think bigger to be able to survive better.. But thinking bigger is not suicidal thinking that causes suffer to the people, suicidal thinking is a nihilist thinking that is not efficient thinking that thinks bigger and that solves problems, so be capable and be responsable and be wise, being wiser is also taking into account the right variables and factors that enhance your living conditions and the living conditions of your children and the people.. So here is again my model that i have enhanced: But we can not have confidence in people, we have to enforce morality with laws, but morality is not something easy , because morality is not just a priori pure moral, morality is infered also from empirical moral that is also from power and counter-power, but we are more lucky today because empirical moral is not so bad, because i have said that: Past was the past, but today it is different, we are getting world stability from the power and the counter-power, so we not just have governance and/or democracy that is the power of people, but also we have the counter-power of the financial and banks institutions that have there rating methodology that take into account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, and we have the counter-power of the consummers confidence index, and this creates a world stability because we have to optimize our economic systems and by being responsable by being also responsable governance, other than that compassion and respect can be virility and they are like mandatory for the system, because compassion and respect gets us more organized because neglecting compassion and respect cause violence and extremism that make our society unstable and less optimized , so tuning compassion and respect right with social services and medical services and with educational services and with help to the people to avoid violence and extremisme is also more stability and more power , so this compassion and respect is virility, other than that you have to know how to tune compassion and respect to not hurt consummer confidence index internationally and locally. And about immigration: Virility and usefulness We have to do more philosophy.. There is some of you who define virility as being courageous or violent.. But this is not the right way to define virility.. You have to define it to know it: Virility is maturity and also it is intelligence and it is money and it is knowledge and it is efficiency etc. Virility is not just being violent or being courageous.. Now can we make this criterion of virility the criterion at how we have to be selected as an immigrant ? I don't think it is the right way.. Because to be accepted as an immigrant we have to be categorized by the criterion of usefulness, this is optimization of today, so to fulfil the goal of economic growth and economic efficiency and to be able to give jobs to the right persons, we have to think by the criterion of usefulness, this is how works USA and this is how works Canada too, even if we select some immigrants taking also into consideration human rights. Knowledge changes your perception.. But quality of knowledge is also very important to set it right.. To overcome many constrains you have to know how to tune some variables, like you have to know how to define usefulness, and this is the weakness of neo-nazis like ideologies, today optimization is defined by the criterion of usefulness, and usefulness is not that arabs have to be as beautiful as white europeans, this is the old way of thinking, so usefulness to conform to the standards of today that take into account efficiency of economy has been defined differently than the neo-nazis kind of thinking, so we have to adapt , because USA and Canada have to optimize there economies taking into account many constrains, because also usefulness is constrained also by contrains and this is why USA and Canada are getting more clever at defining usefulness and usefulness of immigrants to better optimize there economies, so i am calling to all of you to adapt to the reality of today, because the past was the past, and today is today, so please adapt yourself ! And more about the criterion of usefulness.. Optimization today is defined by usefulness.. But do you think that usefulness can be tuned exactly ? No Sir, usefulness is constrained by some constrains that make tuning of usefulness more an approximation than an exact calculation, this is the weakness of the far-right and neo-nazis kind of ideologies, you have to know that tuning usefulness is still an approximation, and this approximation sets optimization that sets immigration. So don't be immature and adapt yourself to today and to science ! Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
rami17 <rami17@rami17.net>: Apr 07 09:06PM -0400 Hello... Read again my more precise post: From where you get world stability ? Past was the past, but today it is different, we are getting world stability from the power and the counter-power, so we not just have governance and/or democracy that is the power of people, but also we have the counter-power of the financial and banks institutions that have there rating methodology that take into account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, and we have the counter-power of the consummers confidence index, and this creates a world stability because we have to optimize our economic systems and by being responsable by being also responsable governance, and about racism i have just said that: To the neo-nazis and far-right political parties.. You have to know that the financial and banks institutions do take into account the Political Risk factor, and they do take into account economic conditions of the state and the country, here is an example of some of the rating methodology of Moody's: https://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_186998 So you have to know that racism of political parties like far-rights parties or neo-nazis like parties does influence the rating of those Banks and financial institutions that make loans to the countries, because racism causes that researchers and engineers and intellectuals will boycott the country and the State , so they will not come to the country that exhibit a governance that is racist, so this will impact negatively economy, so financial and banks institutions do take into account this factor and they will rate low this behavior, and racism that exhibit a neo-nazi or far-right kind of governance has a greater negative impact on the consummers confidence index and this also will have a greater negative impact on economy, so financial and banks institutions do take also into account this factor and they will rate very very low this behavior, so this is very very bad for the country that behave like this. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment