Digest for comp.programming.threads@googlegroups.com - 11 updates in 11 topics

comp.programming.threads@googlegroups.com

Google Groups

Topic digest
View all topics

• About C#... - 1 Update
• About Lazarus.. - 1 Update
• Correction about C#... - 1 Update
• What is the essence of capitalism ? - 1 Update
• Read again, i correct because i think fast and i write fast - 1 Update
• Morality is also "diversity" - 1 Update
• More smartness about morality.. - 1 Update
• Now about the right abstraction of morality - 1 Update
• Artificial intelligence is becoming "powerful" - 1 Update
• Here is one of the news of DeepMind - 1 Update
• My Scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references was updated to version 1.2 - 1 Update

About C#...

Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 10 09:35PM -0400 Hello,     About C#...   I will stop coding in C# , MonoDevelop visual designer with its GTK# is less powerful than Delphi, so i think i will continu to bring the best to Delphi and to FreePascal because also they are using a "modern" Object Pascal that is also powerful, and as you have noticed i am an inventor that has invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations and i have implemented them in Delphi and FreePascal and C++, also my Delphi projects can be used from C++Builder, also i will try to sell many of my scalable algorithms and there implementations and many of my projects to Embarcadero compagny or/and to Microsoft or/and to Google.     Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to top

About Lazarus..

Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 10 06:40PM -0400 Hello,   About Lazarus..   As you know i am coding now with Delphi and with FreePascal and with C#, and you know me more that i have invented many scalable algorithms and implemented them and ported them to Delphi and to FreePascal and to C++, i will also soon port many of my scalable algrithms and projects to C# , and i am also using Lazarus..   Speaking about modern Object Pascal of Delphi and FreePascal, read also the following about Lazarus for Cross-Platform Development that uses "modern" Object Pascal:   https://www.linuxjournal.com/magazine/lazarus-cross-platform-development     Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to top

Correction about C#...

Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 10 09:45PM -0400 Hello,     Correction about C#...   Since i speak also french here in Quebec Canada, so i have made a mistake, we don't write "compagny" in english with a "g" like in french, but we write it correctly as "company", so i correct and sorry for this little mistake because i speak and write french and english and arab, so please reread:     About C#...   I will stop coding in C# , MonoDevelop visual designer with its GTK# is less powerful than Delphi, so i think i will continu to bring the best to Delphi and to FreePascal because also they are using a "modern" Object Pascal that is also powerful, and as you have noticed i am an inventor that has invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations and i have implemented them in Delphi and FreePascal and C++, also my Delphi projects can be used from C++Builder, also i will try to sell many of my scalable algorithms and there implementations and many of my projects to Embarcadero company or/and to Microsoft or/and to Google.     Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to top

What is the essence of capitalism ?

Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 17 07:18PM -0400 Hello.....   Read this:     More about the essence of capitalism   What is the essence of capitalism ?   Capitalism wants to make money and want us to be "usefulness" that makes money, and it is like an "optimization" in mathematics, it is prioritizing and saying that usefulness that makes money or attract more money is a "high" priority, because money is really important in life ! this is why USA wants to be rich ! USA is not as neo-nazism , because neo-nazism wants to prioritize by giving a high priority to white europeans "race" ! but capitalism such as the one of USA doesn't accept neo-nazism because it is as it is not pragmatism , because pragmatism of capitalism dictates that we have to attract "useful" immigrants such as arab immigrants(it is called usefulness Sir!) even they are not white europeans because the "high" priority of capitalism is to be rich ! so don't be stupid like neo-nazism or nationalism, this is why morality has to understand the pragmatism of capitalism and it has to know how to gives it priority taking into account the priority of security, we call it prioritizing to be able to succeed ! and we have to be pragmatic Sir.   Read the rest of my thoughts:   Follow with me because it is very important, because it is the base of morality that i am talking about:   I said also that:   Morality is also "diversity"   I said it to be able to be more correct abstraction, i give you an example: if you say like neo-nazism that "all" of us that are not handicaped have to work "hard" to not be a parasite of the system, i think that's lack of maturity that doesn't recognize that there is also "constrains" that we have to deal with, and saying like neo-nazism that all that are not handicaped have to work hard to not be a parasite is also an "idealism" that is not correct morality, this is why you have to be more "maturity" that is pragmatism, that means that is realistic to be able to be an appropriate morality, today because of our world is not a perfect world, competitiveness and prioritization dictate that high IQ individuals can group together (like Google) and make "much" "much" more money than the less smart individuals, and also because of Risks and competitiveness we are allowing the Banks to make more and more money, this is also morality that takes into account the constrains, but how in this context can we take more money from the rich and give it to the poorer ? i think that capitalism such as the one of USA knows also about pragmatism, because capitalism of USA is a policeman that doesn't want capitalism to be changed in more favor of the poorer because it fears imperfections of humans and it fears the "mess" of socialism and it fears the "mess" of communism and it fears the mess of other ideologies like neo-nazism or nationalism, this is why capitalistic systems are "conservatism" of there capitalism.   Please read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:   More smartness about morality..   Like Philosopher Sir Immanuel Kant you can define morality as being a composition of a priori pure moral inferred from reason and of empirical moral inferred from experience.   You will say that this definition is a "general" definition.   Now what about my definitions of morality ?   We have to be more smart..   I think that morality can not be morality if it is not good for us ! i think this is inherent to morality, and you will notice that this "good for us" can be "not" yet absolute "perfection", but we have to speak about a constraint over morality, that morality can not be called morality if the living conditions are too bad ! so this will abstract more correctly the definition of morality, so now we can say that my definition of morality as being performance and reliability is correct, also empiricism tells us that the essence of our life shows us that to be able to "survive" we have to be also this performance and this reliability, and when i say reliability is inherent to my definition of morality, that means it is the "right" reliability because it is also inherent to it, so my definition is also correct, and this apllies also to my other definitions of morality that i think are correct. So i think my logical proof is valid, so reread my following thoughts to understand better:     I am a white arab and a more serious computer programmer that has invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations and i will sell some of them to Microsoft or to Google or to Embarcadero.   Now about the right abstraction of morality   What is it a more correct abstraction of morality ?   This is a good question in philosophy !   It is like mathematics , you have to be more "logical" and be more "measure" and be more "precise", and being more logical and more measure and more precise is like doing mathematics !   Why have you seen me defining and explaining to you what is morality ?   It is a very serious subject, and you have to be smart to understand it !   Because philosophy, like the philosophy of the philosopher that is Sir Immanuel Kant, must be a philosophy that is more "precise" calculations with logic and measure that has as a goal to make us understand what is all about morality ! this is what also i am doing ! and i will continu to do it in front of your eyes..   So my question of today is:   What is it a more correct abstraction of morality ?   A more correct abstraction of morality is first a definition of morality that is sufficient and necessary to be able to see more the big picture of what is morality, and if you are like the philosopher Sir Immanuel Kant, you will define morality as being a composition of a priori pure moral inferred from reason and of empirical moral inferred from experience, but i think that this definition is too much abstraction that doesn't show us the big picture of what is morality, so we have to be more smart , this is why you have seen me thinking more smartly to find what is morality, and you have noticed that my first definition of morality was that morality is: Performance and reliability or is by just one word reliability, and i have also defined morality by saying that it is: perfection and strongness , and i have finally explained and give another definition of morality that is: morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, this abstraction is more correct also , i explain:   So when i said that morality is: performance and reliability, is it a correct definition ?   It is like philosophy that i am doing..   So notice that i have proved it this way:   ==   From where can we infer that "performance" is inherent to morality ?   Philosophically we can say that the essence of organization is: we are organizing because of our weaknesses to transcend our weaknesses, so from this we can feel the essence of our humanity and we can feel our essence , because the essence of humanity that is perfection and strongness is dictated by survival too ! and is dictated by the fact that we must transcend our living conditions towards a better world ! so this is part of morality, so then we can say that performance is inherent to morality.   So my way of thinking and proving shows better what must be the conception of our organization as a society, it must also be based on "performance".   ===     So as you have noticed that this proves the part of my definition of morality that it is also "performance", now the second part of the definition of morality is that morality is also "reliability", and i have "proved" it like this:   ==   What is the essence of reliability ?   What is reliability ?   We can simply say that we measure reliability by the fact that the "reference" of measure is the fact that we want to solve and it is also the fact that what we have do solve or not, if it solves that's the measure that permit us to say that it is reliable, so being the right "perfection" that solves our problems is also "reliability", and being this right perfection is also "morality", and being this right perfection is dependent also on the standard of quality, so to be a correct morality we have to be high standards of quality to be able to solve and to succeed, and as i said Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality,so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like mathematics.   ==   So now you are seeing more the big picture of what is morality, because the essence of reliability is solving problems and the essence of perfection is also the same , it is solving problems, and "performance" is inherent to the concept of reliability , because to be able to solve problems, reliability must be also performance or strongness, this is why i said that the definition of morality can be also only: RELIABILITY , or it can be also Performance and reliability or it can be perfection and strongness, but we have to be more precise with a more correct "abstraction" this is why you have seen me speaking about "idealism" in my previous post, and i have said with a more correct abstraction that morality is also "darkness" and it is also "diversity", because perfection is not only light but it is also darkness and it is also diversity, read all my following thoughts as my proof of what i am saying to be able to understand my smartness:   About the wisdom of my poems..   You will notice that my poems are like "wisdom", or like philosophy, also because i am in reality a "gentleman" type of person, and i am in reality like a "wise" type of person, and my poems are "smart" ! so i continu to explain to you my poems, as you have notice i have posted one of my poem in my last post and i have explained it to you more, you can read it bellow, you will notice also that this poem is smart, because like my wisdom bellow it get "out" you from "idealism" without getting into pessimism and violence, because i have talked about idealism of racism of neo-nazism or idealism of socialism and i have explained that they are "not" correct morality, and i have explained to you what is morality also, so thus notice in my poem bellow that i am saying that "perfection" that has an essence "solving" problems, because i think we say we are perfection and reliable if we can solve problems, and if we are xcapable of solving all the problems we wsay that we are absolute perfection or complete realiability, so morality also is contineous perfection as i have explained, so notice with me that in my poem bellow i said that perfection is also "diversity" or perfection is also "darkness" of weakness or suffering, and i said that perfection is also the strong that needs the weak and weak that needs the strong, and i said also also in my poem that:   "But the weak becomes better Because our civilization is not a decoy"     So as you have noticed my poem is smart because in my poem i am getting out of idealism without being pessimism and violence, this is why i have said the following on one of my previous post:     My wisdom of today..   A better politics..   Now you know me more by my writings, and now i will give you an important wisdom:   One of my previous important wisdom in politics was:   Today we have to know how to get out from "idealism" without being pessimistic or without getting into pessimism and violence.   My other wisdom of today is:   A better martial art in politics is to avoid at best "brute" force and to know how with a minimum brute force to score and to succeed.     This is why i told you before another wisdom by saying the following:   Violence is "easy" today, so destruction is easy, but "wisdom" is to know how to transcend our living conditions by being discipline of technology and science and by being sophistication of technology and science and by being wisdom that knows how to guide our world and humanity in the right and wise way.   This wisdom looks like my above one that says:   A better martial art in politics is to avoid at best "brute" force and to know how with minimum brute force to score and to succeed.   So you have to be smart , this is what i am learning with my writings.       So here is my poem and read it again:   Here is the explanation bellow of my following poem, you have to be smart to understand it correctly ! here it is and read my explanation of it bellow:     We are past and present   Because time is like a balance   Because time is perfection   Because perfection is the scale   But how perfection can be only light ?   Perfection is also darkness   Because we are strong and weak   Even silence is strong and weak   Eventhough silence is divine   Because even love is effervescence   Bees know about time   That time is relativity   And relativity is diversity   But what is perfection?   Perfection is also diversity   Diversity is also immensity   Because time is relativity   The weak needs the strong   And the strong needs the weak   But the weak becomes better   Because our civilization is not a decoy   Since diversity is the seed   Since the scale creates consciousness   Because the scale creates abundance   Since diversity is also seasons   Who creates wisdom and reason   So hello to you my dear and beautiful   With your lovely pretty eyes   You carry me on the wind and the Rainbow   To drive us to a beautiful island   Like our love and tenderness   Rather for goods never I leave you!   My sweet and beautiful goddess   My sweet spring and my sweet princess   Our hearts finally beat in unison   Like a nice thrill and a nice song   I do not want to hurt you   Because you are like the pretty flower that can not die!   As if both of us were as one   Let's be the flower and the perfum!   And may infinity and depth bring us together   Since our destiny is infinite   Since our destiny has understood   That the pretty fir is not cursed   Because Christmas is divine   As silence is a pretty parfum   Because in the depth of your pretty eyes   Who reminds me of our beautiful raft   Who defies storms and seasons   Since life is not a gift   And because destiny and reason are our passion   Because beauty reminds us   That she can not be violence and hatred   Since relativity of time is like a mason   Since the weather is seasons that brings reason   So, hello to you man of reason!     Amine Moulay Ramdane.   ===     First to understand better, you have to understand that rationalism alone is not enough, and empiricism alone is not enough, so you have to be both rationalism and empiricism to be better and to understand my poem, this is also the "fondation" of my poem, because my poem is also like "philosophy", and it is like a Labyrinth , you have to be smart to find its meaning, so i start to explain:   When i say in my poem the following:   "We are past and present Because time is like a balance"   When i say we are past and present it must be measured by my overall poem, you can not measure it alone, so my poem is about life , that it is both weak and strong and it is both beautiful and not beautiful and it is suffering and not suffering, and this conditions of living of suffering and not beautifulness and weakness are also like "inherited" from the "past", so they contains savagery etc. of the past, this is the meaning in the "context" of my overall poem of: "We are past and present"   And now about the following part of my poem:   "Because time is like a balance"   I mean that "time" needs "causality", thus the consequences need the causes, this is why time is like a balance.

Back to top

Read again, i correct because i think fast and i write fast

Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 17 06:58PM -0400 Hello..   Read this:   Read again, i correct because i think fast and i write fast     Follow with me because it is very important, because it is the base of morality that i am talking about:   I said also that:   Morality is also "diversity"   I said it to be able to be more correct abstraction, i give you an example: if you say like neo-nazism that "all" of us that are not handicaped have to work "hard" to not be a parasite of the system, i think that's lack of maturity that doesn't recognize that there is also "constrains" that we have to deal with, and saying like neo-nazism that all that are not handicaped have to work hard to not be a parasite is also an "idealism" that is not correct morality, this is why you have to be more "maturity" that is pragmatism, that means that is realistic to be able to be an appropriate morality, today because of our world is not a perfect world, competitiveness and prioritization dictate that high IQ individuals can group together (like Google) and make "much" "much" more money than the less smart individuals, and also because of Risks and competitiveness we are allowing the Banks to make more and more money, this is also morality that takes into account the constrains, but how in this context can we take more money from the rich and give it to the poorer ? i think that capitalism such as the one of USA knows also about pragmatism, because capitalism of USA is a policeman that doesn't want capitalism to be changed in more favor of the poorer because it fears imperfections of humans and it fears the "mess" of socialism and it fears the "mess" of communism and it fears the mess of other ideologies like neo-nazism or nationalism, this is why capitalistic systems are "conservatism" of there capitalism.   Please read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:   More smartness about morality..   Like Philosopher Sir Immanuel Kant you can define morality as being a composition of a priori pure moral inferred from reason and of empirical moral inferred from experience.   You will say that this definition is a "general" definition.   Now what about my definitions of morality ?   We have to be more smart..   I think that morality can not be morality if it is not good for us ! i think this is inherent to morality, and you will notice that this "good for us" can be "not" yet absolute "perfection", but we have to speak about a constraint over morality, that morality can not be called morality if the living conditions are too bad ! so this will abstract more correctly the definition of morality, so now we can say that my definition of morality as being performance and reliability is correct, also empiricism tells us that the essence of our life shows us that to be able to "survive" we have to be also this performance and this reliability, and when i say reliability is inherent to my definition of morality, that means it is the "right" reliability because it is also inherent to it, so my definition is also correct, and this apllies also to my other definitions of morality that i think are correct. So i think my logical proof is valid, so reread my following thoughts to understand better:     I am a white arab and a more serious computer programmer that has invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations and i will sell some of them to Microsoft or to Google or to Embarcadero.   Now about the right abstraction of morality   What is it a more correct abstraction of morality ?   This is a good question in philosophy !   It is like mathematics , you have to be more "logical" and be more "measure" and be more "precise", and being more logical and more measure and more precise is like doing mathematics !   Why have you seen me defining and explaining to you what is morality ?   It is a very serious subject, and you have to be smart to understand it !   Because philosophy, like the philosophy of the philosopher that is Sir Immanuel Kant, must be a philosophy that is more "precise" calculations with logic and measure that has as a goal to make us understand what is all about morality ! this is what also i am doing ! and i will continu to do it in front of your eyes..   So my question of today is:   What is it a more correct abstraction of morality ?   A more correct abstraction of morality is first a definition of morality that is sufficient and necessary to be able to see more the big picture of what is morality, and if you are like the philosopher Sir Immanuel Kant, you will define morality as being a composition of a priori pure moral inferred from reason and of empirical moral inferred from experience, but i think that this definition is too much abstraction that doesn't show us the big picture of what is morality, so we have to be more smart , this is why you have seen me thinking more smartly to find what is morality, and you have noticed that my first definition of morality was that morality is: Performance and reliability or is by just one word reliability, and i have also defined morality by saying that it is: perfection and strongness , and i have finally explained and give another definition of morality that is: morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, this abstraction is more correct also , i explain:   So when i said that morality is: performance and reliability, is it a correct definition ?   It is like philosophy that i am doing..   So notice that i have proved it this way:   ==   From where can we infer that "performance" is inherent to morality ?   Philosophically we can say that the essence of organization is: we are organizing because of our weaknesses to transcend our weaknesses, so from this we can feel the essence of our humanity and we can feel our essence , because the essence of humanity that is perfection and strongness is dictated by survival too ! and is dictated by the fact that we must transcend our living conditions towards a better world ! so this is part of morality, so then we can say that performance is inherent to morality.   So my way of thinking and proving shows better what must be the conception of our organization as a society, it must also be based on "performance".   ===     So as you have noticed that this proves the part of my definition of morality that it is also "performance", now the second part of the definition of morality is that morality is also "reliability", and i have "proved" it like this:   ==   What is the essence of reliability ?   What is reliability ?   We can simply say that we measure reliability by the fact that the "reference" of measure is the fact that we want to solve and it is also the fact that what we have do solve or not, if it solves that's the measure that permit us to say that it is reliable, so being the right "perfection" that solves our problems is also "reliability", and being this right perfection is also "morality", and being this right perfection is dependent also on the standard of quality, so to be a correct morality we have to be high standards of quality to be able to solve and to succeed, and as i said Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality,so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like mathematics.   ==   So now you are seeing more the big picture of what is morality, because the essence of reliability is solving problems and the essence of perfection is also the same , it is solving problems, and "performance" is inherent to the concept of reliability , because to be able to solve problems, reliability must be also performance or strongness, this is why i said that the definition of morality can be also only: RELIABILITY , or it can be also Performance and reliability or it can be perfection and strongness, but we have to be more precise with a more correct "abstraction" this is why you have seen me speaking about "idealism" in my previous post, and i have said with a more correct abstraction that morality is also "darkness" and it is also "diversity", because perfection is not only light but it is also darkness and it is also diversity, read all my following thoughts as my proof of what i am saying to be able to understand my smartness:   About the wisdom of my poems..   You will notice that my poems are like "wisdom", or like philosophy, also because i am in reality a "gentleman" type of person, and i am in reality like a "wise" type of person, and my poems are "smart" ! so i continu to explain to you my poems, as you have notice i have posted one of my poem in my last post and i have explained it to you more, you can read it bellow, you will notice also that this poem is smart, because like my wisdom bellow it get "out" you from "idealism" without getting into pessimism and violence, because i have talked about idealism of racism of neo-nazism or idealism of socialism and i have explained that they are "not" correct morality, and i have explained to you what is morality also, so thus notice in my poem bellow that i am saying that "perfection" that has an essence "solving" problems, because i think we say we are perfection and reliable if we can solve problems, and if we are xcapable of solving all the problems we wsay that we are absolute perfection or complete realiability, so morality also is contineous perfection as i have explained, so notice with me that in my poem bellow i said that perfection is also "diversity" or perfection is also "darkness" of weakness or suffering, and i said that perfection is also the strong that needs the weak and weak that needs the strong, and i said also also in my poem that:   "But the weak becomes better Because our civilization is not a decoy"     So as you have noticed my poem is smart because in my poem i am getting out of idealism without being pessimism and violence, this is why i have said the following on one of my previous post:     My wisdom of today..   A better politics..   Now you know me more by my writings, and now i will give you an important wisdom:   One of my previous important wisdom in politics was:   Today we have to know how to get out from "idealism" without being pessimistic or without getting into pessimism and violence.   My other wisdom of today is:   A better martial art in politics is to avoid at best "brute" force and to know how with a minimum brute force to score and to succeed.     This is why i told you before another wisdom by saying the following:   Violence is "easy" today, so destruction is easy, but "wisdom" is to know how to transcend our living conditions by being discipline of technology and science and by being sophistication of technology and science and by being wisdom that knows how to guide our world and humanity in the right and wise way.   This wisdom looks like my above one that says:   A better martial art in politics is to avoid at best "brute" force and to know how with minimum brute force to score and to succeed.   So you have to be smart , this is what i am learning with my writings.       So here is my poem and read it again:   Here is the explanation bellow of my following poem, you have to be smart to understand it correctly ! here it is and read my explanation of it bellow:     We are past and present   Because time is like a balance   Because time is perfection   Because perfection is the scale   But how perfection can be only light ?   Perfection is also darkness   Because we are strong and weak   Even silence is strong and weak   Eventhough silence is divine   Because even love is effervescence   Bees know about time   That time is relativity   And relativity is diversity   But what is perfection?   Perfection is also diversity   Diversity is also immensity   Because time is relativity   The weak needs the strong   And the strong needs the weak   But the weak becomes better   Because our civilization is not a decoy   Since diversity is the seed   Since the scale creates consciousness   Because the scale creates abundance   Since diversity is also seasons   Who creates wisdom and reason   So hello to you my dear and beautiful   With your lovely pretty eyes   You carry me on the wind and the Rainbow   To drive us to a beautiful island   Like our love and tenderness   Rather for goods never I leave you!   My sweet and beautiful goddess   My sweet spring and my sweet princess   Our hearts finally beat in unison   Like a nice thrill and a nice song   I do not want to hurt you   Because you are like the pretty flower that can not die!   As if both of us were as one   Let's be the flower and the perfum!   And may infinity and depth bring us together   Since our destiny is infinite   Since our destiny has understood   That the pretty fir is not cursed   Because Christmas is divine   As silence is a pretty parfum   Because in the depth of your pretty eyes   Who reminds me of our beautiful raft   Who defies storms and seasons   Since life is not a gift   And because destiny and reason are our passion   Because beauty reminds us   That she can not be violence and hatred   Since relativity of time is like a mason   Since the weather is seasons that brings reason   So, hello to you man of reason!     Amine Moulay Ramdane.   ===     First to understand better, you have to understand that rationalism alone is not enough, and empiricism alone is not enough, so you have to be both rationalism and empiricism to be better and to understand my poem, this is also the "fondation" of my poem, because my poem is also like "philosophy", and it is like a Labyrinth , you have to be smart to find its meaning, so i start to explain:   When i say in my poem the following:   "We are past and present Because time is like a balance"   When i say we are past and present it must be measured by my overall poem, you can not measure it alone, so my poem is about life , that it is both weak and strong and it is both beautiful and not beautiful and it is suffering and not suffering, and this conditions of living of suffering and not beautifulness and weakness are also like "inherited" from the "past", so they contains savagery etc. of the past, this is the meaning in the "context" of my overall poem of: "We are past and present"   And now about the following part of my poem:   "Because time is like a balance"   I mean that "time" needs "causality", thus the consequences need the causes, this is why time is like a balance.     And about the other parts of my poem, we read this:   "Because time is perfection Because perfection is the scale"     Here again you have to be smart to understand the meaning, it is like rationalism and empiricism , you can not understand the meaning by just being rationalism ! you have to be both rationalism and empiricism to understand, so when you are both you will understand by empiricism, that time is perfection, because the "small" cause of the Big Bang has given the "immensity" of the Universe that is perfection, and life also has started from "small" to "much" bigger that is perfection, and when i say that: "Because perfection is the scale", that means that for example the Universe and life have been perfected and it is the scale, because the Universe has balanced more and life has balanced more to be perfection.   Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:   "But how perfection can be only light ? Perfection is also darkness"     I mean that perfection needs the weak also, because we notice it in our lives that the strong needs the weak, and life needs suffering, this is why it is also "darkness".

Back to top

Morality is also "diversity"

Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 17 06:41PM -0400 Hello,   Read this:   Follow with me because it is very important, because it is the base of morality that i am talking about:   I said also that:   Morality is also "diversity"   I said it to be able to be more correct abstraction, i give you an example: if you say like neo-nazism that "all" of us have to work "hard" to not be a parasite of the system, i think that's lack of maturity that doesn't recognize that there is also "constrains" that we have to deal with, and saying like neo-nazism that all have to work hard to not be a parasite is also an "idealism" that is not correct morality, this is why you have to be more "maturity" that is pragmatism, that means that is realistic to be able to be an appropriate morality, today because of our world is not a perfect world, competitiveness and prioritization dictate that high IQ individuals can group together (like Google) and make "much" "much" more money than the less smart individuals, and also because of Risks and competitiveness we are allowing the Banks to make more and more money, this is also morality that takes into account the constrains, but how in this context can we take more money from the rich and give it to the poorer ? i think that capitalism such as the one of USA knows also about pragmatism, because capitalism of USA is a policeman that doesn't want capitalism to be changed in more favor of the poorer because it fears imperfections of humans and it fears the "mess" of socialism and it fears the "mess" of communism and it fears the mess of other ideologies like neo-nazism or nationalism, this is why capitalistic systems are "conservatism" of there capitalism.   Please read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:   More smartness about morality..   Like Philosopher Sir Immanuel Kant you can define morality as being a composition of a priori pure moral inferred from reason and of empirical moral inferred from experience.   You will say that this definition is a "general" definition.   Now what about my definitions of morality ?   We have to be more smart..   I think that morality can not be morality if it is not good for us ! i think this is inherent to morality, and you will notice that this "good for us" can be "not" yet absolute "perfection", but we have to speak about a constraint over morality, that morality can not be called morality if the living conditions are too bad ! so this will abstract more correctly the definition of morality, so now we can say that my definition of morality as being performance and reliability is correct, also empiricism tells us that the essence of our life shows us that to be able to "survive" we have to be also this performance and this reliability, and when i say reliability is inherent to my definition of morality, that means it is the "right" reliability because it is also inherent to it, so my definition is also correct, and this apllies also to my other definitions of morality that i think are correct. So i think my logical proof is valid, so reread my following thoughts to understand better:     I am a white arab and a more serious computer programmer that has invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations and i will sell some of them to Microsoft or to Google or to Embarcadero.   Now about the right abstraction of morality   What is it a more correct abstraction of morality ?   This is a good question in philosophy !   It is like mathematics , you have to be more "logical" and be more "measure" and be more "precise", and being more logical and more measure and more precise is like doing mathematics !   Why have you seen me defining and explaining to you what is morality ?   It is a very serious subject, and you have to be smart to understand it !   Because philosophy, like the philosophy of the philosopher that is Sir Immanuel Kant, must be a philosophy that is more "precise" calculations with logic and measure that has as a goal to make us understand what is all about morality ! this is what also i am doing ! and i will continu to do it in front of your eyes..   So my question of today is:   What is it a more correct abstraction of morality ?   A more correct abstraction of morality is first a definition of morality that is sufficient and necessary to be able to see more the big picture of what is morality, and if you are like the philosopher Sir Immanuel Kant, you will define morality as being a composition of a priori pure moral inferred from reason and of empirical moral inferred from experience, but i think that this definition is too much abstraction that doesn't show us the big picture of what is morality, so we have to be more smart , this is why you have seen me thinking more smartly to find what is morality, and you have noticed that my first definition of morality was that morality is: Performance and reliability or is by just one word reliability, and i have also defined morality by saying that it is: perfection and strongness , and i have finally explained and give another definition of morality that is: morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, this abstraction is more correct also , i explain:   So when i said that morality is: performance and reliability, is it a correct definition ?   It is like philosophy that i am doing..   So notice that i have proved it this way:   ==   From where can we infer that "performance" is inherent to morality ?   Philosophically we can say that the essence of organization is: we are organizing because of our weaknesses to transcend our weaknesses, so from this we can feel the essence of our humanity and we can feel our essence , because the essence of humanity that is perfection and strongness is dictated by survival too ! and is dictated by the fact that we must transcend our living conditions towards a better world ! so this is part of morality, so then we can say that performance is inherent to morality.   So my way of thinking and proving shows better what must be the conception of our organization as a society, it must also be based on "performance".   ===     So as you have noticed that this proves the part of my definition of morality that it is also "performance", now the second part of the definition of morality is that morality is also "reliability", and i have "proved" it like this:   ==   What is the essence of reliability ?   What is reliability ?   We can simply say that we measure reliability by the fact that the "reference" of measure is the fact that we want to solve and it is also the fact that what we have do solve or not, if it solves that's the measure that permit us to say that it is reliable, so being the right "perfection" that solves our problems is also "reliability", and being this right perfection is also "morality", and being this right perfection is dependent also on the standard of quality, so to be a correct morality we have to be high standards of quality to be able to solve and to succeed, and as i said Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality,so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like mathematics.   ==   So now you are seeing more the big picture of what is morality, because the essence of reliability is solving problems and the essence of perfection is also the same , it is solving problems, and "performance" is inherent to the concept of reliability , because to be able to solve problems, reliability must be also performance or strongness, this is why i said that the definition of morality can be also only: RELIABILITY , or it can be also Performance and reliability or it can be perfection and strongness, but we have to be more precise with a more correct "abstraction" this is why you have seen me speaking about "idealism" in my previous post, and i have said with a more correct abstraction that morality is also "darkness" and it is also "diversity", because perfection is not only light but it is also darkness and it is also diversity, read all my following thoughts as my proof of what i am saying to be able to understand my smartness:   About the wisdom of my poems..   You will notice that my poems are like "wisdom", or like philosophy, also because i am in reality a "gentleman" type of person, and i am in reality like a "wise" type of person, and my poems are "smart" ! so i continu to explain to you my poems, as you have notice i have posted one of my poem in my last post and i have explained it to you more, you can read it bellow, you will notice also that this poem is smart, because like my wisdom bellow it get "out" you from "idealism" without getting into pessimism and violence, because i have talked about idealism of racism of neo-nazism or idealism of socialism and i have explained that they are "not" correct morality, and i have explained to you what is morality also, so thus notice in my poem bellow that i am saying that "perfection" that has an essence "solving" problems, because i think we say we are perfection and reliable if we can solve problems, and if we are xcapable of solving all the problems we wsay that we are absolute perfection or complete realiability, so morality also is contineous perfection as i have explained, so notice with me that in my poem bellow i said that perfection is also "diversity" or perfection is also "darkness" of weakness or suffering, and i said that perfection is also the strong that needs the weak and weak that needs the strong, and i said also also in my poem that:   "But the weak becomes better Because our civilization is not a decoy"     So as you have noticed my poem is smart because in my poem i am getting out of idealism without being pessimism and violence, this is why i have said the following on one of my previous post:     My wisdom of today..   A better politics..   Now you know me more by my writings, and now i will give you an important wisdom:   One of my previous important wisdom in politics was:   Today we have to know how to get out from "idealism" without being pessimistic or without getting into pessimism and violence.   My other wisdom of today is:   A better martial art in politics is to avoid at best "brute" force and to know how with a minimum brute force to score and to succeed.     This is why i told you before another wisdom by saying the following:   Violence is "easy" today, so destruction is easy, but "wisdom" is to know how to transcend our living conditions by being discipline of technology and science and by being sophistication of technology and science and by being wisdom that knows how to guide our world and humanity in the right and wise way.   This wisdom looks like my above one that says:   A better martial art in politics is to avoid at best "brute" force and to know how with minimum brute force to score and to succeed.   So you have to be smart , this is what i am learning with my writings.       So here is my poem and read it again:   Here is the explanation bellow of my following poem, you have to be smart to understand it correctly ! here it is and read my explanation of it bellow:     We are past and present   Because time is like a balance   Because time is perfection   Because perfection is the scale   But how perfection can be only light ?   Perfection is also darkness   Because we are strong and weak   Even silence is strong and weak   Eventhough silence is divine   Because even love is effervescence   Bees know about time   That time is relativity   And relativity is diversity   But what is perfection?   Perfection is also diversity   Diversity is also immensity   Because time is relativity   The weak needs the strong   And the strong needs the weak   But the weak becomes better   Because our civilization is not a decoy   Since diversity is the seed   Since the scale creates consciousness   Because the scale creates abundance   Since diversity is also seasons   Who creates wisdom and reason   So hello to you my dear and beautiful   With your lovely pretty eyes   You carry me on the wind and the Rainbow   To drive us to a beautiful island   Like our love and tenderness   Rather for goods never I leave you!   My sweet and beautiful goddess   My sweet spring and my sweet princess   Our hearts finally beat in unison   Like a nice thrill and a nice song   I do not want to hurt you   Because you are like the pretty flower that can not die!   As if both of us were as one   Let's be the flower and the perfum!   And may infinity and depth bring us together   Since our destiny is infinite   Since our destiny has understood   That the pretty fir is not cursed   Because Christmas is divine   As silence is a pretty parfum   Because in the depth of your pretty eyes   Who reminds me of our beautiful raft   Who defies storms and seasons   Since life is not a gift   And because destiny and reason are our passion   Because beauty reminds us   That she can not be violence and hatred   Since relativity of time is like a mason   Since the weather is seasons that brings reason   So, hello to you man of reason!     Amine Moulay Ramdane.   ===     First to understand better, you have to understand that rationalism alone is not enough, and empiricism alone is not enough, so you have to be both rationalism and empiricism to be better and to understand my poem, this is also the "fondation" of my poem, because my poem is also like "philosophy", and it is like a Labyrinth , you have to be smart to find its meaning, so i start to explain:   When i say in my poem the following:   "We are past and present Because time is like a balance"   When i say we are past and present it must be measured by my overall poem, you can not measure it alone, so my poem is about life , that it is both weak and strong and it is both beautiful and not beautiful and it is suffering and not suffering, and this conditions of living of suffering and not beautifulness and weakness are also like "inherited" from the "past", so they contains savagery etc. of the past, this is the meaning in the "context" of my overall poem of: "We are past and present"   And now about the following part of my poem:   "Because time is like a balance"   I mean that "time" needs "causality", thus the consequences need the causes, this is why time is like a balance.     And about the other parts of my poem, we read this:   "Because time is perfection Because perfection is the scale"     Here again you have to be smart to understand the meaning, it is like rationalism and empiricism , you can not understand the meaning by just being rationalism ! you have to be both rationalism and empiricism to understand, so when you are both you will understand by empiricism, that time is perfection, because the "small" cause of the Big Bang has given the "immensity" of the Universe that is perfection, and life also has started from "small" to "much" bigger that is perfection, and when i say that: "Because perfection is the scale", that means that for example the Universe and life have been perfected and it is the scale, because the Universe has balanced more and life has balanced more to be perfection.   Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:   "But how perfection can be only light ? Perfection is also darkness"     I mean that perfection needs the weak also, because we notice it in our lives that the strong needs the weak, and life needs suffering, this is why it is also "darkness".   Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:   "Because we are strong and weak Even silence is strong and weak

Back to top

More smartness about morality..

Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 17 05:33PM -0400 Hello....   Read this:     More smartness about morality..   Like Philosopher Sir Immanuel Kant you can define morality as being a composition of a priori pure moral inferred from reason and of empirical moral inferred from experience.   You will say that this definition is a "general" definition.   Now what about my definitions of morality ?   We have to be more smart..   I think that morality can not be morality if it is not good for us ! i think this is inherent to morality, and you will notice that this "good for us" can be "not" yet absolute "perfection", but we have to speak about a constraint over morality, that morality can not be called morality if the living conditions are too bad ! so this will abstract more correctly the definition of morality, so now we can say that my definition of morality as being performance and reliability is correct, also empiricism tells us that the essence of our life shows us that to be able to "survive" we have to be also this performance and this reliability, and when i say reliability is inherent to my definition of morality, that means it is the "right" reliability because it is also inherent to it, so my definition is also correct, and this apllies also to my other definitions of morality that i think are correct. So i think my logical proof is valid, so reread my following thoughts to understand better:     I am a white arab and a more serious computer programmer that has invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations and i will sell some of them to Microsoft or to Google or to Embarcadero.   Now about the right abstraction of morality   What is it a more correct abstraction of morality ?   This is a good question in philosophy !   It is like mathematics , you have to be more "logical" and be more "measure" and be more "precise", and being more logical and more measure and more precise is like doing mathematics !   Why have you seen me defining and explaining to you what is morality ?   It is a very serious subject, and you have to be smart to understand it !   Because philosophy, like the philosophy of the philosopher that is Sir Immanuel Kant, must be a philosophy that is more "precise" calculations with logic and measure that has as a goal to make us understand what is all about morality ! this is what also i am doing ! and i will continu to do it in front of your eyes..   So my question of today is:   What is it a more correct abstraction of morality ?   A more correct abstraction of morality is first a definition of morality that is sufficient and necessary to be able to see more the big picture of what is morality, and if you are like the philosopher Sir Immanuel Kant, you will define morality as being a composition of a priori pure moral inferred from reason and of empirical moral inferred from experience, but i think that this definition is too much abstraction that doesn't show us the big picture of what is morality, so we have to be more smart , this is why you have seen me thinking more smartly to find what is morality, and you have noticed that my first definition of morality was that morality is: Performance and reliability or is by just one word reliability, and i have also defined morality by saying that it is: perfection and strongness , and i have finally explained and give another definition of morality that is: morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, this abstraction is more correct also , i explain:   So when i said that morality is: performance and reliability, is it a correct definition ?   It is like philosophy that i am doing..   So notice that i have proved it this way:   ==   From where can we infer that "performance" is inherent to morality ?   Philosophically we can say that the essence of organization is: we are organizing because of our weaknesses to transcend our weaknesses, so from this we can feel the essence of our humanity and we can feel our essence , because the essence of humanity that is perfection and strongness is dictated by survival too ! and is dictated by the fact that we must transcend our living conditions towards a better world ! so this is part of morality, so then we can say that performance is inherent to morality.   So my way of thinking and proving shows better what must be the conception of our organization as a society, it must also be based on "performance".   ===     So as you have noticed that this proves the part of my definition of morality that it is also "performance", now the second part of the definition of morality is that morality is also "reliability", and i have "proved" it like this:   ==   What is the essence of reliability ?   What is reliability ?   We can simply say that we measure reliability by the fact that the "reference" of measure is the fact that we want to solve and it is also the fact that what we have do solve or not, if it solves that's the measure that permit us to say that it is reliable, so being the right "perfection" that solves our problems is also "reliability", and being this right perfection is also "morality", and being this right perfection is dependent also on the standard of quality, so to be a correct morality we have to be high standards of quality to be able to solve and to succeed, and as i said Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality,so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like mathematics.   ==   So now you are seeing more the big picture of what is morality, because the essence of reliability is solving problems and the essence of perfection is also the same , it is solving problems, and "performance" is inherent to the concept of reliability , because to be able to solve problems, reliability must be also performance or strongness, this is why i said that the definition of morality can be also only: RELIABILITY , or it can be also Performance and reliability or it can be perfection and strongness, but we have to be more precise with a more correct "abstraction" this is why you have seen me speaking about "idealism" in my previous post, and i have said with a more correct abstraction that morality is also "darkness" and it is also "diversity", because perfection is not only light but it is also darkness and it is also diversity, read all my following thoughts as my proof of what i am saying to be able to understand my smartness:   About the wisdom of my poems..   You will notice that my poems are like "wisdom", or like philosophy, also because i am in reality a "gentleman" type of person, and i am in reality like a "wise" type of person, and my poems are "smart" ! so i continu to explain to you my poems, as you have notice i have posted one of my poem in my last post and i have explained it to you more, you can read it bellow, you will notice also that this poem is smart, because like my wisdom bellow it get "out" you from "idealism" without getting into pessimism and violence, because i have talked about idealism of racism of neo-nazism or idealism of socialism and i have explained that they are "not" correct morality, and i have explained to you what is morality also, so thus notice in my poem bellow that i am saying that "perfection" that has an essence "solving" problems, because i think we say we are perfection and reliable if we can solve problems, and if we are xcapable of solving all the problems we wsay that we are absolute perfection or complete realiability, so morality also is contineous perfection as i have explained, so notice with me that in my poem bellow i said that perfection is also "diversity" or perfection is also "darkness" of weakness or suffering, and i said that perfection is also the strong that needs the weak and weak that needs the strong, and i said also also in my poem that:   "But the weak becomes better Because our civilization is not a decoy"     So as you have noticed my poem is smart because in my poem i am getting out of idealism without being pessimism and violence, this is why i have said the following on one of my previous post:     My wisdom of today..   A better politics..   Now you know me more by my writings, and now i will give you an important wisdom:   One of my previous important wisdom in politics was:   Today we have to know how to get out from "idealism" without being pessimistic or without getting into pessimism and violence.   My other wisdom of today is:   A better martial art in politics is to avoid at best "brute" force and to know how with a minimum brute force to score and to succeed.     This is why i told you before another wisdom by saying the following:   Violence is "easy" today, so destruction is easy, but "wisdom" is to know how to transcend our living conditions by being discipline of technology and science and by being sophistication of technology and science and by being wisdom that knows how to guide our world and humanity in the right and wise way.   This wisdom looks like my above one that says:   A better martial art in politics is to avoid at best "brute" force and to know how with minimum brute force to score and to succeed.   So you have to be smart , this is what i am learning with my writings.       So here is my poem and read it again:   Here is the explanation bellow of my following poem, you have to be smart to understand it correctly ! here it is and read my explanation of it bellow:     We are past and present   Because time is like a balance   Because time is perfection   Because perfection is the scale   But how perfection can be only light ?   Perfection is also darkness   Because we are strong and weak   Even silence is strong and weak   Eventhough silence is divine   Because even love is effervescence   Bees know about time   That time is relativity   And relativity is diversity   But what is perfection?   Perfection is also diversity   Diversity is also immensity   Because time is relativity   The weak needs the strong   And the strong needs the weak   But the weak becomes better   Because our civilization is not a decoy   Since diversity is the seed   Since the scale creates consciousness   Because the scale creates abundance   Since diversity is also seasons   Who creates wisdom and reason   So hello to you my dear and beautiful   With your lovely pretty eyes   You carry me on the wind and the Rainbow   To drive us to a beautiful island   Like our love and tenderness   Rather for goods never I leave you!   My sweet and beautiful goddess   My sweet spring and my sweet princess   Our hearts finally beat in unison   Like a nice thrill and a nice song   I do not want to hurt you   Because you are like the pretty flower that can not die!   As if both of us were as one   Let's be the flower and the perfum!   And may infinity and depth bring us together   Since our destiny is infinite   Since our destiny has understood   That the pretty fir is not cursed   Because Christmas is divine   As silence is a pretty parfum   Because in the depth of your pretty eyes   Who reminds me of our beautiful raft   Who defies storms and seasons   Since life is not a gift   And because destiny and reason are our passion   Because beauty reminds us   That she can not be violence and hatred   Since relativity of time is like a mason   Since the weather is seasons that brings reason   So, hello to you man of reason!     Amine Moulay Ramdane.   ===     First to understand better, you have to understand that rationalism alone is not enough, and empiricism alone is not enough, so you have to be both rationalism and empiricism to be better and to understand my poem, this is also the "fondation" of my poem, because my poem is also like "philosophy", and it is like a Labyrinth , you have to be smart to find its meaning, so i start to explain:   When i say in my poem the following:   "We are past and present Because time is like a balance"   When i say we are past and present it must be measured by my overall poem, you can not measure it alone, so my poem is about life , that it is both weak and strong and it is both beautiful and not beautiful and it is suffering and not suffering, and this conditions of living of suffering and not beautifulness and weakness are also like "inherited" from the "past", so they contains savagery etc. of the past, this is the meaning in the "context" of my overall poem of: "We are past and present"   And now about the following part of my poem:   "Because time is like a balance"   I mean that "time" needs "causality", thus the consequences need the causes, this is why time is like a balance.     And about the other parts of my poem, we read this:   "Because time is perfection Because perfection is the scale"     Here again you have to be smart to understand the meaning, it is like rationalism and empiricism , you can not understand the meaning by just being rationalism ! you have to be both rationalism and empiricism to understand, so when you are both you will understand by empiricism, that time is perfection, because the "small" cause of the Big Bang has given the "immensity" of the Universe that is perfection, and life also has started from "small" to "much" bigger that is perfection, and when i say that: "Because perfection is the scale", that means that for example the Universe and life have been perfected and it is the scale, because the Universe has balanced more and life has balanced more to be perfection.   Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:   "But how perfection can be only light ? Perfection is also darkness"     I mean that perfection needs the weak also, because we notice it in our lives that the strong needs the weak, and life needs suffering, this is why it is also "darkness".   Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:   "Because we are strong and weak Even silence is strong and weak Eventhough silence is divine"     I mean by silence that it is complete silence of our thoughts , so complete silence is not having consciousness, it is like a piece of paper, a piece of paper is also complete silence, because it is not consciousness, so a piece of paper is like divine, because it is very "strong" because it doesn't feel suffering and it doesn't have difficulties , but it is also weak if we take the measure and the reference as being it much much less complex than other very complex objects.   Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:   "And relativity is diversity"   You need both empiricism and rationalism to understand it, i mean the overall "set" contains empiricism, so from experience we can say that: "And relativity is diversity".   Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:   "Perfection is also diversity Diversity is also immensity Because time is relativity"   Here again, you need both empiricism and rationalism to understand it, i mean the overall "set" contains empiricism, so from experience we can say the above.   And i think that now it is more easy to understand all my poem above.       thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to top

Now about the right abstraction of morality

Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 17 04:38PM -0400 Hello...   Read this:     I am a white arab and a more serious computer programmer that has invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations and i will sell some of them to Microsoft or to Google or to Embarcadero.   Now about the right abstraction of morality   What is it a more correct abstraction of morality ?   This is a good question in philosophy !   It is like mathematics , you have to be more "logical" and be more "measure" and be more "precise", and being more logical and more measure and more precise is like doing mathematics !   Why have you seen me defining and explaining to you what is morality ?   It is a very serious subject, and you have to be smart to understand it !   Because philosophy, like the philosophy of the philosopher that is Sir Immanuel Kant, must be a philosophy that is more "precise" calculations with logic and measure that has as a goal to make us understand what is all about morality ! this is what also i am doing ! and i will continu to do it in front of your eyes..   So my question of today is:   What is it a more correct abstraction of morality ?   A more correct abstraction of morality is first a definition of morality that is sufficient and necessary to be able to see more the big picture of what is morality, and if you are like the philosopher Sir Immanuel Kant, you will define morality as being a composition of a priori pure moral inferred from reason and of empirical moral inferred from experience, but i think that this definition is too much abstraction that doesn't show us the big picture of what is morality, so we have to be more smart , this is why you have seen me thinking more smartly to find what is morality, and you have noticed that my first definition of morality was that morality is: Performance and reliability or is by just one word reliability, and i have also defined morality by saying that it is: perfection and strongness , and i have finally explained and give another definition of morality that is: morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, this abstraction is more correct also , i explain:   So when i said that morality is: performance and reliability, is it a correct definition ?   It is like philosophy that i am doing..   So notice that i have proved it this way:   ==   From where can we infer that "performance" is inherent to morality ?   Philosophically we can say that the essence of organization is: we are organizing because of our weaknesses to transcend our weaknesses, so from this we can feel the essence of our humanity and we can feel our essence , because the essence of humanity that is perfection and strongness is dictated by survival too ! and is dictated by the fact that we must transcend our living conditions towards a better world ! so this is part of morality, so then we can say that performance is inherent to morality.   So my way of thinking and proving shows better what must be the conception of our organization as a society, it must also be based on "performance".   ===     So as you have noticed that this proves the part of my definition of morality that it is also "performance", now the second part of the definition of morality is that morality is also "reliability", and i have "proved" it like this:   ==   What is the essence of reliability ?   What is reliability ?   We can simply say that we measure reliability by the fact that the "reference" of measure is the fact that we want to solve and it is also the fact that what we have do solve or not, if it solves that's the measure that permit us to say that it is reliable, so being the right "perfection" that solves our problems is also "reliability", and being this right perfection is also "morality", and being this right perfection is dependent also on the standard of quality, so to be a correct morality we have to be high standards of quality to be able to solve and to succeed, and as i said Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality,so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like mathematics.   ==   So now you are seeing more the big picture of what is morality, because the essence of reliability is solving problems and the essence of perfection is also the same , it is solving problems, and "performance" is inherent to the concept of reliability , because to be able to solve problems, reliability must be also performance or strongness, this is why i said that the definition of morality can be also only: RELIABILITY , or it can be also Performance and reliability or it can be perfection and strongness, but we have to be more precise with a more correct "abstraction" this is why you have seen me speaking about "idealism" in my previous post, and i have said with a more correct abstraction that morality is also "darkness" and it is also "diversity", because perfection is not only light but it is also darkness and it is also diversity, read all my following thoughts as my proof of what i am saying to be able to understand my smartness:   About the wisdom of my poems..   You will notice that my poems are like "wisdom", or like philosophy, also because i am in reality a "gentleman" type of person, and i am in reality like a "wise" type of person, and my poems are "smart" ! so i continu to explain to you my poems, as you have notice i have posted one of my poem in my last post and i have explained it to you more, you can read it bellow, you will notice also that this poem is smart, because like my wisdom bellow it get "out" you from "idealism" without getting into pessimism and violence, because i have talked about idealism of racism of neo-nazism or idealism of socialism and i have explained that they are "not" correct morality, and i have explained to you what is morality also, so thus notice in my poem bellow that i am saying that "perfection" that has an essence "solving" problems, because i think we say we are perfection and reliable if we can solve problems, and if we are xcapable of solving all the problems we wsay that we are absolute perfection or complete realiability, so morality also is contineous perfection as i have explained, so notice with me that in my poem bellow i said that perfection is also "diversity" or perfection is also "darkness" of weakness or suffering, and i said that perfection is also the strong that needs the weak and weak that needs the strong, and i said also also in my poem that:   "But the weak becomes better Because our civilization is not a decoy"     So as you have noticed my poem is smart because in my poem i am getting out of idealism without being pessimism and violence, this is why i have said the following on one of my previous post:     My wisdom of today..   A better politics..   Now you know me more by my writings, and now i will give you an important wisdom:   One of my previous important wisdom in politics was:   Today we have to know how to get out from "idealism" without being pessimistic or without getting into pessimism and violence.   My other wisdom of today is:   A better martial art in politics is to avoid at best "brute" force and to know how with a minimum brute force to score and to succeed.     This is why i told you before another wisdom by saying the following:   Violence is "easy" today, so destruction is easy, but "wisdom" is to know how to transcend our living conditions by being discipline of technology and science and by being sophistication of technology and science and by being wisdom that knows how to guide our world and humanity in the right and wise way.   This wisdom looks like my above one that says:   A better martial art in politics is to avoid at best "brute" force and to know how with minimum brute force to score and to succeed.   So you have to be smart , this is what i am learning with my writings.       So here is my poem and read it again:   Here is the explanation bellow of my following poem, you have to be smart to understand it correctly ! here it is and read my explanation of it bellow:     We are past and present   Because time is like a balance   Because time is perfection   Because perfection is the scale   But how perfection can be only light ?   Perfection is also darkness   Because we are strong and weak   Even silence is strong and weak   Eventhough silence is divine   Because even love is effervescence   Bees know about time   That time is relativity   And relativity is diversity   But what is perfection?   Perfection is also diversity   Diversity is also immensity   Because time is relativity   The weak needs the strong   And the strong needs the weak   But the weak becomes better   Because our civilization is not a decoy   Since diversity is the seed   Since the scale creates consciousness   Because the scale creates abundance   Since diversity is also seasons   Who creates wisdom and reason   So hello to you my dear and beautiful   With your lovely pretty eyes   You carry me on the wind and the Rainbow   To drive us to a beautiful island   Like our love and tenderness   Rather for goods never I leave you!   My sweet and beautiful goddess   My sweet spring and my sweet princess   Our hearts finally beat in unison   Like a nice thrill and a nice song   I do not want to hurt you   Because you are like the pretty flower that can not die!   As if both of us were as one   Let's be the flower and the perfum!   And may infinity and depth bring us together   Since our destiny is infinite   Since our destiny has understood   That the pretty fir is not cursed   Because Christmas is divine   As silence is a pretty parfum   Because in the depth of your pretty eyes   Who reminds me of our beautiful raft   Who defies storms and seasons   Since life is not a gift   And because destiny and reason are our passion   Because beauty reminds us   That she can not be violence and hatred   Since relativity of time is like a mason   Since the weather is seasons that brings reason   So, hello to you man of reason!     Amine Moulay Ramdane.   ===     First to understand better, you have to understand that rationalism alone is not enough, and empiricism alone is not enough, so you have to be both rationalism and empiricism to be better and to understand my poem, this is also the "fondation" of my poem, because my poem is also like "philosophy", and it is like a Labyrinth , you have to be smart to find its meaning, so i start to explain:   When i say in my poem the following:   "We are past and present Because time is like a balance"   When i say we are past and present it must be measured by my overall poem, you can not measure it alone, so my poem is about life , that it is both weak and strong and it is both beautiful and not beautiful and it is suffering and not suffering, and this conditions of living of suffering and not beautifulness and weakness are also like "inherited" from the "past", so they contains savagery etc. of the past, this is the meaning in the "context" of my overall poem of: "We are past and present"   And now about the following part of my poem:   "Because time is like a balance"   I mean that "time" needs "causality", thus the consequences need the causes, this is why time is like a balance.     And about the other parts of my poem, we read this:   "Because time is perfection Because perfection is the scale"     Here again you have to be smart to understand the meaning, it is like rationalism and empiricism , you can not understand the meaning by just being rationalism ! you have to be both rationalism and empiricism to understand, so when you are both you will understand by empiricism, that time is perfection, because the "small" cause of the Big Bang has given the "immensity" of the Universe that is perfection, and life also has started from "small" to "much" bigger that is perfection, and when i say that: "Because perfection is the scale", that means that for example the Universe and life have been perfected and it is the scale, because the Universe has balanced more and life has balanced more to be perfection.   Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:   "But how perfection can be only light ? Perfection is also darkness"     I mean that perfection needs the weak also, because we notice it in our lives that the strong needs the weak, and life needs suffering, this is why it is also "darkness".   Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:   "Because we are strong and weak Even silence is strong and weak Eventhough silence is divine"     I mean by silence that it is complete silence of our thoughts , so complete silence is not having consciousness, it is like a piece of paper, a piece of paper is also complete silence, because it is not consciousness, so a piece of paper is like divine, because it is very "strong" because it doesn't feel suffering and it doesn't have difficulties , but it is also weak if we take the measure and the reference as being it much much less complex than other very complex objects.   Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:   "And relativity is diversity"   You need both empiricism and rationalism to understand it, i mean the overall "set" contains empiricism, so from experience we can say that: "And relativity is diversity".   Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:   "Perfection is also diversity Diversity is also immensity Because time is relativity"   Here again, you need both empiricism and rationalism to understand it, i mean the overall "set" contains empiricism, so from experience we can say the above.   And i think that now it is more easy to understand all my poem above.       thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to top

Artificial intelligence is becoming "powerful"

Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 17 02:10PM -0400 Hello...   Read this:     Artificial intelligence is becoming "powerful" because we are now capable of "general" artificial intelligence, read carefully what follows, it said that:   "Artificial intelligence up to now, including DeepMind's AlphaGo, have been limited to perform well only for a specific task - hence the term 'narrow artificial intelligence.' But researchers are beginning to embrace the arrival of artificial general intelligence, an AI that can perform any task that a human can. In their recent paper, Google DeepMind proposes a method into training AGI by using genetic algorithm."   And:   "So how well does PathNet perform in action? DeepMind's experiments show that PathNet is faster than fine-tuning, and does positively transfer trained knowledge in supervised learning classification tasks and reinforcement learning tasks - successfully addressing the three requirements of an AGI."   Read more here to notice it:   http://www.deepbio.co.kr/2017/03/20/Weekly-paper-DeepMinds-PathNet.html     And read about the following other important step that is Generative Adversarial Network:   What's a Generative Adversarial Network? Leading Researcher Explains   Read more here:   https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2017/05/17/generative-adversarial-network/         Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to top

Here is one of the news of DeepMind

Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 17 02:07PM -0400 Hello,   Read this:     Here is one of the news of DeepMind:   Measuring abstract reasoning in neural networks   Read more here:   https://deepmind.com/blog/measuring-abstract-reasoning/       Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to top

My Scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references was updated to version 1.2

Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 17 01:24PM -0400 Hello..   Read this:     My Scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references was updated to version 1.2   My new scalable algorithm was enhanced to ensure that it is thread-safe, i have also benchmarked it and it is really amazing ! because it is really fast and it is "scalable"(on NUMA systems and multicores).   As you have noticed Embarcadero company that actually sells its Delphi product has pushed to adopt the ARC memory manager despite it being not the right choice for highly parallel applications, so i have decided to invent a "scalable" reference counting with efficient support for weak references that is suited also for "highly" parallel applications and i have implemented it in Delphi and FreePascal, and you will not find it on C++ or Rust or Delphi, here is my "invention" and read about it and download it from bellow:   Scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references version 1.2   Author: Amine Moulay Ramdane   Description:   I have enhanced my scalable algorithm and now it is much powerful, now my scalable algorithm implementation works also as a "scalable" counter that supports both "increment" and "decrement" using two scalable counting networks, please take a look at my new scalable algorithm implementation inside the source code..   This is my scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references, and since problems that cannot be solved without weak references are rare, so this library does scale very well, this scalable reference counting is implemented using scalable counting networks that eliminate completely false sharing , so it is fully scalable on multicore processors and manycore processors and this scalable algorithm is optimized, and this library does work on both Windows and Linux (x86), and it is easy to port to Mac OS X.   I have modified my scalable algorithm, now as you will notice i am not using decrement with support for antitokens in the balancers of the scalable counting networks, i am only using an "increment", please look at my new scalable algorithm inside the zip file, i think it is working correctly. Also notice that the returned value of _Release() method will be valid if it is equal to 0.   I have optimized it more, now i am using only tokens and no antitokens in the balancers of the scalable counting networks, so i am only supporting increment, not decrement, so you have to be smart to invent it correctly, this is what i have done, so look at the AMInterfacedObject.pas file inside my zip file, you will notice that it uses counting_network_next_value() function, counting_network_next_value() increments the scalable counting network by 1, the _AddRef() method is simple, it increment by 1 to increment the reference to the object, but look inside the _Release() method it calls counting_network_next_value() three times, and my invention is calling counting_network_next_value(cn1) first inside the _Release() method to be able to make my scalable algorithm works, so just debug it more and you will notice that my scalable algorithm is smart and it is working correctly, i have debugged it and i think it is working correctly.   I have to prove my scalable reference counting algorithm, like with mathematical proof, so i will use logic to prove like in PhD papers:   You will find the code of my scalable reference counting inside AMInterfacedObject.pas inside the zip file here:   If you look inside the code there is two methods, _AddRef() and _Release() methods, i am using two scalable counting networks, think about them like counters, so in the _AddRef() method i am executing the following:   v1 := counting_network_next_value(cn1);   cn1 is the scalable counting network, and counting_network_next_value() is a function that increment the scalable counting network by 1.   In the _Release() method i am executing the following:   v2 := counting_network_next_value(cn1); v1 := counting_network_next_value(cn2); v1 := counting_network_next_value(cn2);   So my scalable algorithm is "smart", because the logical proof is that i am calling counting_network_next_value(cn1) first in the above, so this allows my scalable algorithm to work correctly, because we are advancing cn1 by 1 to obtain the value of cn1, so the other threads are advancing also cn1 by one inside _Release() , it is the last thread that is advancing cn1 by 1 that will make the reference counter equal to 0 , and _AddRef() method is the same and it is easy to reason about, so this scalable algorithm is working. Please look more carefully at my algorithm and you will notice that it is working as i have just logically proved it.   Please read also the following to understand better:   Here is the parameters of the constructor:   First parameter is: The width of the scalable counting networks that permits my scalable refererence counting algorithm to be scalable, this parameter must be 1 to 31, it is now at 4 , this is the power, so it is equal to 2 power 4 , that means 2^4=16, and you have to pass this counting networks width to the n of following formula:   (n*log(n)*(1+log(n)))/4   The log of the formula is in base 2   This formula gives the number of gates of the scalable counting networks, and if we replace n by 16, this will equal 80 gates, that means you can scale the scalable counting networks to 80 cores, and beyond 80 cores you will start to have contention.   Second parameter is: a boolean that tells if reference counting is used or not, it is by default to true, that means that reference counting is used.   About the weak references support: the Weak<T> type supports assignment from and to T and makes it usable as if you had a variable of T. It has the IsAlive property to check if the reference is still valid and not a dangling pointer. The Target property can be used if you want access to members of the reference.   Note: the use of the IsAlive property on our weak reference, this tells us whether the referenced object is still available, and provides a safe way to get a concrete reference to the parent.   I have ported efficient weak references support to Linux by implementing efficient code hooking, look at my DSharp.Core.Detour.pas file for Linux that i have written to see how i have implemented it in the Linux library. Please look at the example.dpr and test.pas demos to see how weak references work etc.   Call _AddRef() and _Release() methods to manually increment or decrement the number of references to the object.   Weak references support is done by hooking the TObject.FreeInstance method so every object destruction is noticed and if a weak reference for that object exists it gets removed from the internal dictionary where all weak references are stored. While it works I am aware that this is hacky approach and it might not work if someone overrides the FreeInstance method and does not call inherited.     You can download it from:   https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references   - Platform: Windows and Linux(x86)   Language: FPC Pascal v3.1.x+ / Delphi 2007+:   http://www.freepascal.org/   Required FPC switches: -O3 -Sd   -Sd for delphi mode....   Required Delphi switches: -$H+ -DDelphi   For Delphi XE versions and Delphi Tokyo use the -DXE switch   The defines options inside defines.inc are:   {$DEFINE CPU32} for 32 bit systems   {$DEFINE CPU64} for 64 bit systems       Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to top

You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.